Home Page
Louisiana Anthology

Zebulon Montgomery Pike
“The Expeditions of Zebulon Montgomery Pike”

Notes to next group

  1. Finish proofreading -- some words have gotten pushed together. Stopped after STOPPED HERE. Note - Please read over the reading to be sure no mistakes were made during proofreading
    (original document should be original document)
  2. Lines 5801-9559 have not been proofread.

In presuming to claim your protection and patronage for the following production, I feel less diffidence, knowing that thievery institution of the society will plead in my favor, it being avowedly formed for the promotion of military knowledge.

The work is merely a volume of details, and if it should be found that in the relation I have delivered myself with perspicuity and exactitude, it is the highest meed of praise that I claim. When I touched on abstract subjects, or presumed to hypothesize, I have merely suggested doubts without conclusions, which, if deemed worthy, may hereafter be analyzed by men of genius and science. It being a work which has arisen from the events of youthful military exertions, the author, perhaps, haste most just and well-founded ground for a hope that it may receive the solicited approbation of your honorable institution.

I am, gentlemen, with the greatest respect and high consideration,

Your obedient servant,

Z. M. PIKE,

Major 6th Regt. Infantry,
M. U. S. M. P. Society.

CONTENTS OF VOL I.


PAGES
Original Preface, i-iv
New Preface, v-xviii*
Memoir of Zebulon Montgomery Pike, xix-cxiv
PART I.
The Mississippi Voyage.
CHAPTER I.
Itinerary: St. Louis to St. Paul, August 9th-September21st, 1805, 1-81
CHAPTER II.
Itinerary, Continued: St. Paul to Leech Lake, September 22d, 1805-January 31st, 1806, 82-151
CHAPTER III.
Itinerary, Concluded: Leech Lake to St. Louis, February 1st-April 30th, 1806, 152-215
CHAPTER IV.
Weather Diary of the Mississippi, 216-220
CHAPTER V.
Correspondence and Conferences, 221-273
CHAPTER VI.
Commerce of the Mississippi, 274-286
CHAPTER VII.
Geography of the Mississippi, 287-336
CHAPTER VIII.
Ethnography of the Mississippi, 337-354
CHAPTER IX.
Vocabulary of Mississippian Place-names, 355, 356

PREFACE TO THE ORIGINAL EDITION.


To the Public:

Books of travels, journals, and voyages have become so numerous, and are so frequently impositions on the public, that the writer of the following sheets feels under an obligation to explain, in some measure, the original circumstances that led to the production of this volume. Soon after the purchase of Louisiana by an enlightened administration, measures were taken to explore the then unknown wilds of our western country — Measures founded on principles of scientific pursuits, combined with a view of entering into a chain of philanthropic arrangements for ameliorating the condition of the Indians who inhabit those vast plains and deserts. His Excellency, Meriwether Lewis, then a captain of the first regiment of infantry, was selected by the President of the United States, in conjunction with Captain C. Clarke [Wm. Clark], to explore the then unknown sources of the Missouri, and I was chosen to trace the Mississippi to its source, with the objects in view contemplated by my instructions; to which I conceived my duty as a soldier should induce me to add an investigation into the views of the British traders in that quarter as to trade, and an inquiry into the limits of the territories of the United States and Great Britain. As a man of humanity and feeling, I made use of the name of my government to stop the savage warfare which had forages been carried on by two of the most powerful nations of aborigines in North America. Why I did not execute the power vested in me by the laws of the country, to ruin the British traders and enrich myself, by seizing on the immense property of the North West Company, which I found in the acknowledged boundary of the United States, will be explained by my letter to Hugh M’Gillis, Esq., to whom I own eternal gratitude for his polite and hospitable treatment of myself and party.

In the execution of this voyage I had no gentleman to aid me, and I literally performed the duties (as far as my limited abilities permitted) of astronomer, surveyor, commanding officer, clerk, spy, guide, and hunter; frequently preceding the party for miles in order to reconnoiter, and returning in the evening, hungry and fatigued, to sit down in the open air, by fire light, to copy the notes and plot the courses of the day.

On my return from the Mississippi voyage, preparations were making for a second, which was to be conducted by another gentleman of the army; but General Wilkinson solicited as a favor that which he had a right to command, viz., that I would agree to take charge of the expedition. The late dangers and hardships I had undergone, together with the idea of again leaving my family in a strange country, distant from their connections, made me hesitate; but the ambition of a soldier, and the spirit of enterprise which was inherent in my breast, induced me to agree to his proposition. The great objects in view by this expedition, as I conceived in addition to my instructions, were to attach the Indians to our government, and to acquire such geographical knowledge of the southwestern boundary of Louisiana as to enable our government to enter into a definitive arrangement for a line of demarcation between that territory and North Mexico.

In this expedition I had the assistance of Lieutenant James [D.] Wilkinson, and also of Dr. John H. Robinson, a young gentleman of science and enterprise, who volunteered his services. I also was fitted out with a complete set of astronomical and mathematical instruments, which enabled me to as certain the geographical situation of various places to a degree of exactitude that would have been extremely gratifying to all lovers of science, had I not been so unfortunate as to lose the greater part of my papers by the seizure of the Spanish government.

With respect to the great acquisitions which might have been made to the sciences of botany and zoölogy, I can only observe that neither my education nor taste led me to the pursuit; and if they had, my mind was too much engrossed in making arrangements for our subsistence and safety to give time to scrutinize the productions of the countries over which we traveled, with the eye of a Linnæus or Buffon; yet Dr. Robinson did make some observations on those subjects, which he has not yet communicated. With respect to the Spanish part, it has been suggested to me by some respected friends that the picture I drew of the manners, morals, etc., of individuals generally of New Spain, if a good likeness, was certainly not making a proper return for the hospitality and kindness with which those people honored me. Those reasons have induced me to omit many transactions, and draw a veil over various habits and customs which might appear in an unfavorable point of view, at the same time that I have dwelt with delight on their virtues.

There have not been wanting persons of various ranks who have endeavored to infuse the idea into the minds of the public that the last voyage was undertaken through some sinister designs of General Wilkinson; and although this report has been amply refuted by two letters from the Secretary of War, published with this work, yet I cannot forbear, in this public manner, declaring the insinuation to be a ground less calumny, arising from the envenomed breasts of persons who, through enmity to the general, would, in attempting his ruin, hurl destruction on all those who, either through their official stations or habits of friendship, ever had any connection with that gentleman.

As a military man — As a soldier from the time I was able to bear arms — It cannot be expected that a production of my pen can stand the test of criticism; and I hope, by this candid appeal to the justice and indulgence of the learned,to induce them to spare their censure if they cannot award their praise.

The gentleman who prints this work knows under what a variety of disadvantages it has gone to the press.[OP-1] At a distance during its publication, and engaged in my professional duties, it was impossible to give to it that attention which, in order to reach its proper degree of correctness, such a work necessarily would require.

Z. M. Pike.

PREFACE TO THE NEW EDITION.


Pike’s expeditions were the first military and the second governmental explorations which were pushed to any considerable extent in our then newly acquired territory of Louisiana. The name and fame of the brilliant young soldier who impersonated the authority of the United States over all the ground between British and Spanish possessions are thus inseparably linked with those of Lewis and Clark in the beginning of our history of the Great West — a West so great that it reached from the Mississippi to the Pacific. The two movements were similar in scope and plan; both were in the nature of claiming possession of property; they were a like fruitful of permanent good results; but they differed entirely in the circumstances under which each was devised, and to a marked degree in their respective purposes. Lewis and Clark’s enterprise originated with the President of the United States; and though both of the men to whom that most memorable exploration was confided were officers of the regular army, their military organization was entirely subservient to affairs of state, being simply designed to secure the most efficient discipline in the discharge of certain civilian duties. Jefferson had invested heavily in real estate; the Louisiana purchase had been made with the people’s money; he naturally wished to know what sort of a bargain he had made with Napoleon; so he sent Lewis and Clark to explore the vast extent of country he had bought. While their faces were still fixed on the setting sun, which for them still dipped behind the shining snow-caps, Pike set forth on his first journey northward; while they were homeward bound from the SouthSea by way of the mighty Missouri and the rugged Roche Jaune, he was pressing on his second way toward the Mexican mountains. Both his expeditions originated with the commander-in-chief of the army; both were as strictly military in method as in purpose. Pike was the simon-pure and simple soldier. South Seaad been ordered by his general to carry our flag among British traders and Sioux, Ojibways, and other Indians of the Northwest, in the first instance; in the second place, to display that emblem of authority among the Osages, Pawnees, and Comanches, and plant that standard of the republic on the still disputed boundary ofNew Spain in the Southwest. All else that he accomplished was incidental to Wilkinson’s main aim. How daring werePike’s exploits, these volumes testify. Their moral effect was enormous; their results proved far-reaching; and some of these are still in evidence of intrepid adventure pushed to successful issue.

If the record of Pike’s expeditions be overshadowed by the history of still greater and partly prior achievement, we may remember that its luster is dimmed only in comparison with the incomparable story of Lewis and Clark. If this witness of arduous duty ardently done in the service of his country stand dumb before that startling tragedy which set the seal of sacrifice upon a devoted life, we may reflect that such a consummation of noble aspirations but capped the climax of unswerving patriotism and unwavering fidelity to lofty ideals when it transfigured the already celebrated explorer into a national hero and a popular idol. Pike’s personality is not less picturesque than is hiof newer unique; our interest in his character becomes vivid as we study its manifestations, and perhaps even outgrows that regard we may bestow upon those of his achievements which have passed into permanent history. The present volumes tell his own story, in his own way; they are autobiographical in all that relates to the principal incidents and most stirring scenes of his life, before that final catastrophe which turned the tide of international warfare. If the narrative neverhalted at the point of an unaccustomed pen it would not be Pike’s, and it would lack a certain quality which not even aBiddle could impart to the more polished and finished history of Lewis and Clark. It now seems probable that both books will endure, side by side, so long as any interest in the beginnings of our Great West finds a place in the hearts of the people.

Pike anticipated Lewis and Clark by about four years in bringing the results of his partly simultaneous explorations before the public. Since the first appearance of his work, there has never been a time when it has not been cited by scholars as an original authority in the many matters of historical, geographical, ethnological, and related interests of which it treats. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that Pike has never been so widely or so well known as he deserves to be in his double character of traveler and author. The soldier could hardly desire greater fame than fell to the happy lot of the hero of York, victorious in death; but what of his life? Who was this General Pike before that — Who was Lieutenant or Captain Pike? where did he go exploring? what did he discover? how should we know? In searching contemporaneous records of the War of 1812 for biographical data in the preparation of the Memoir which introduces these volumes, it was always the great soldier — General Pike — whom I found, with scant recognition, if anything more than mere mention, of the still greater explorer — the youthful, the dashing and winning, the ardent and enthusiastic lieutenant, who dreamed of glory till his dream came true. The fact would seem to be that Pike’s death on the field of battle, under exceptionally thrilling circumstances, obscured rather than accentuated those earlier exploits which set his title to fame in the clearest and truest light. Probably no good general would have failed in what Pike accomplished on the day of his death; but how many subalterns in their twenties have won imperishable renown by achievements in the field of exploration — One purpose I had in view in preparing a new editionof this work will have been subserved if I have succeeded in eliminating a certain popular aberration, in calculating aright the parallax of Pike as viewed from different standpoints, and in thus placing his name in proper historical perspective.

Nearly or quite all that an editor might be expected to say in his preface concerning the subject-matter of his author will be found to have been said already in one place or another in the course of the extensive and minute commentary which appears upon almost every page of the present edition. Nevertheless, so few are the persons who have any clear or coherent ideas on the subject of Pike’s performances, that it will be to cons ult the convenience of most readers who may take up this book to give here a brief statement of his journeyings.

Pike conducted two entirely separate and distinct expeditions.One of them, in 1805-6, was from St. Louis by way of the Mississippi to the headwaters of this river, and return for the most part by the same way he went. This round trip, which I have called the "Mississippi Voyage, "forms Pt. 1 of his book. The other expedition was taken westward from St. Louis into the interior parts of the thenLouisiana, to the sources of the Arkansas river, and among the Rocky mountains of present Colorado. In so far asPike protracted this exploration of his own volition, it formsPt. 2 of his book, which I have designated the "ArkansawJourney." But at one point in the course of this journeyPike was captured by the Spaniards, and conducted against his will by a roundabout way through Mexico to the then Spanish-American boundary between Texas andLouisiana. This episode, unflattering to Pike’s sensibilities, if not wholly unforeseen by him, he saw fit to make the subject of Pt. 3 of his book; I have entitled it the"Mexican Tour."

I. In July, 1805, Pike was ordered by General Wilkinson to explore and report upon the Mississippi river from St.Louis to its source, select sites for military posts, treat with the Indians, make peace if possible between the Sioux andOjibways, and find out what he could about the British traders who still occupied posts in our newly acquired territory.Excepting these establishments of the NorthwestCompany, there were then no white settlements on or near the river beyond the village of Prairie du Chien, and our flag had never flown in that quarter. Pike navigated his boats to the vicinity of present Little Falls, but could get them no further. He there built a stockade, in which some of his men were left for the winter, and with the rest pushed on by land along the river to Lower Red Cedar Lake — Sandy lake — Grand rapids and Pokegama falls — mouth of Leech Lake river — up the latter to Leech lake — and thence to Upper Red Cedar (now Cass) lake, at the mouth of Turtle river. This was the furthest point here ached. He considered the Leech Lake drainage-area — whichI have called the Pikean source — to be the true origin of the Mississippi, and remained in ignorance of the fact that this river flowed into Cass lake from such lakes asBemidji and Itasca, though these and others were already known to some of the whites. Returning from Cass toLeech lake, and thence, by a more direct overland route than he had before taken, to the Mississippi in the vicinity of Lower Red Cedar lake, he descended the river to his stockade, picked up the men who had wintered there, and as soon as the ice broke up started in boats for St. Louis, which he reached in safety with all his party in April, 1806.

II. In July, 1806, Pike left St. Louis on his second expedition. He ascended the Missouri to the Osage, and the latter to the villages of the Indians of that name.Thence he continued westward overland, entered Kansas, and proceeded to the Pawnee village on the Republican river, near the present Kansas-Nebraska line. Turning southward, he reached the Arkansas river at the present site of Great Bend. There he dispatched his junior officer,Lieutenant Wilkinson, with a few men, to descend the Arkansas, while with the rest of his company he ascended the same river into Colorado, as far as Pueblo. From thispoint he made an unsuccessful side-trip which had for its object the ascent of the since famous peak which bears his name, and returned to his camp at Pueblo. Thence pushing up the Arkansas, he was halted by the Grand cañon, at the site of present Cañon City. He then made a detour to the right, which took him up Oil creek into South Park.He traversed this park, along the South Platte and some of its tributaries, left it by way of Trout Creek pass, and was thus again brought to the Arkansas. He pushed up this river till he viewed its sources, in the vicinity of present Leadville, turned about, and with great difficulty descend edit to the very camp he had left at Cañon City. This part of his journey was not accomplished without much hard ship, and ended in chagrin; for he had fancied himself on the headwaters of that Red river whose sources he had been pointedly instructed to discover. Nothing was known at that time, to Americans, of the origin of that great branch of the Mississippi which was called Red river lower down; nor was it known till years afterward that what the Spaniards had called high up by a name equivalent to Red river was really that main fork of the Arkansas which is now designated the Canadian river, whose sources are in the mountains not far from Santa Fé. This was the river which Pike might have found, had his search been more fortunately directed, though neither he nor any other American was aware of that fact at the time. Never the less, he determined to carry out his orders to the letter, and with more courage than discretion pushed southward from his camp at Cañon City to discover an elusive Red river.He passed up that tributary of the Arkansas which is now called Grape creek, and thus into the Wet Mountain valley. There the party suffered almost incredibly from cold and hunger; some of the men were frozen and crippled for life. But Pike managed to extricate himself and most of his companions from their perilous situation by crossing the Sangre de Cristo range through the Sand Hill pass into the San Luis valley, where he found himself on theRio Grande del Norte. He descended this river to the Rio Conejos, and there established himself in a stockade — in part at least for the purpose of tarrying while he sent a small party back for those of the men who had been left behind, both at Cañon City and in Wet Mountain valley.

The secret which underlay Pike’s ostensible instructions from General Wilkinson, and the mystery which is supposed to have enshrouded his movements on this portion of his second expedition, are fully discussed in my notes, at various points in Pike’s narrative or in my Memoir, where the subject obtrudes. Without going into any particulars here, it is to be said simply that Pike may have been ordered to proceed to Santa Fé — or as near that capital of Spanish New Mexico as he could go with the force at his command — without being informed of whatever ulterior designs the general of the army may have entertained.

III. Pike was captured in his stockade, with the few men he had left about him, by Spanish dragoons, under the orders of General Allencaster, then governor of New Mexico.The message he received from his captors was disguised under the form of a polite invitation to visit the governor at Santa Fé. On the 27th of February, 1807, he left his post as a prisoner in the hands of a half-hostile foreign power, accompanied by the remnant of his men.They were treated with great forbearance — nay, with distinguished consideration; nevertheless, Pike was brought to book before the authorities, and required to explain how he had happened to invade Spanish territory with an armed force. Governor Allencaster then ordered him to report to General Salcedo at Chihuahua; he was accordingly escorted by the military down the Rio Grande from Santa Fé to ElPaso, and thence by the usual route southward, in what was then New Biscay, to the first named city. From this capital he was conducted, still under guard, through a portion of what is now the State of Durango, around by the Bolson de Mapimi, thence northward throughout Coahuila, and so onto San Antonio. Continuing through Texas, he was finally delivered out of the hands of his Spanish hosts and captors, on crossing the river which in part bounds our present State of Louisiana; and ended his long peregrination at Natchitoches, among his own countrymen.

At this point the author’s narrative ends abruptly, so far as any itinerary of his movements is concerned. We are not even told what became of the men who did not accompany him to Natchitoches — those who were left behind when he started from the Rio Conejos, either at that point, or in the Wet Mountain valley, or on the Arkansas. It had been understood, and was fully expected, that they were all to follow him through Mexico under Spanish escort. It is probable that they did so, and that all were finally restored to the United States. But at the last word we have on the subject from Pike himself, eight persons were still detained in Mexico. (See p. 855.)

If the reader will now turn to p. xxxvi, he will find there and on some following pages an analysis of the original edition of Pike’s work, together with an exposition of the wholly exceptional editorial difficulty of reproducing such a complicated affair in anything like good book form. The author, like many another gallant soldier, versed in the arts of war, was quite innocent of literary strategy, though capable of heading an impetuous assault upon the parts of speech. He may have acquired an impression, by no means confined to his own profession, that a book is made by putting manuscript in a printing-press and stirring it about with a composing-stick, which, like a magic wand that some kind fairy waves in an enchanted castle, will transfigure the homeliness of the pen into a thing of beauty and a joy forever.Pike seems to have labored under some such delusion in preparing his copious materials for the press, and no one appears either to have advised him in these premises or to have revised the proofs. The result was innumerable errors, both of the writing and of the printing, most of which might have been eliminated with due care.

In the original edition, which has never before been reprinted in full, or in anything like its own make-up, the three separate itineraries above noted followed one another consecutively, with only the interruption of certain meteorological tables. These itineraries made about one-half of the volume in bulk, but perhaps only about one-third of the total ems. They were called "Parts," respectively enumeratedI., II., III., and were the only portions of the whole which were printed in large type, as the main "body" of the work. The greater remainder of the author’s materials were then thrown into the form of three Appendixes, one for each of the three foregoing Parts, each one being necessarily displaced from its proper connection, and all being set in small type. The contents of these Appendixes were miscellaneous and multifarious, but reducible in the main to two sorts: (1) Formal retraversing of the ground gone over in the itineraries, with reference to geography, ethnology, commerce, military and political topics, and related matters which came under Pike’s observation; (2) Letters and other documents upon a variety of subjects, representing what may be regarded as the officialities of Pike’s Expeditions.

The determination to edit Pike with the omission of nothing whatever which the work originally contained, and to preserve as far as seemed reasonably possible the shape in which it came from his own hand, involved a problem whose solution was one of no ordinary difficulty. The division of the book into three Parts was perfectly sound, and by all means to be preserved. The main departure from Pike’s plan that seemed to be required was simply to bring each Appendix into direct connection with its ownPart, and set it in uniform typography, as being of equal value and interest with the itinerary. Having made these transpositions, I found it an easy matter to introduce chapter-heads which should co-ordinate the whole of the contents.Each of the three itineraries could be conveniently divided into three chapters, covering as many stages of the several journeys; and in like manner it was found that thecontents of each of the three Appendixes could be naturally grouped under a few heads, thus carrying out the plan of chaptering the whole book. To effect this result required no change whatever in the course of the itineraries, and in the appendicial matters involved only some few unimportant transpositions, mainly for the purpose of rearranging the official correspondence in the chronological sequence of the letters and other documents of which it consisted. But even in this small matter I have been at the pains of pointing out the position which each separate piece occupied in the original edition — perhaps with needless scrupulosity. Aglance at the tables of contents of this edition will show how well or ill the remodeling has been done.

The transpositions thus effected, together with the repeatedly broken and sometimes blank pagination of the original, made it obviously impossible to indicate in this edition the former numeration of the pages. Otherwise, in editing Pike’s text, I have been guided by the same principles which I applied to my recent redaction of Lewis and Clark. I do not think that any editor may feel free to rewrite his author. It would be an unwarrantable liberty to sacrifice an author’s individuality upon the altar of literary style. And especially in the case of an old book — one whose intrinsic merits survive what are "the defects of its qualities," and thus cause it to reappear in a new guise — Is it desirable that the reader should feel sure he is offered a genuine text. At the same time, the essentials of genuineness are different from its factitious ear-marks, and may be preserved with fidelity by an editor who, nevertheless, feels free to disregard non-essentials. Pike’s is both a rare and a curious book; yet we need not venerate its abounding misprints, or burn the incense of admiration in the face of its frequently solecistic grammar, or even kowtow to its peculiar punctuation. Such things as these are assuredly among the non-essentials of a pure text, always amenable to editorial revision, and always open to the welcome attentions of a friendly printer. But for the rest, as I lately said on asimilar occasion, "I have punctiliously preserved the orthography of proper names in all their variance and eccentricity; and wherever I have amplified any statement in the text, or diverted the sense of a passage by a hair’s breadth, square brackets indicate the fact."

usr intended his words to have, thus putting myself as nearly as possible in his place, and always, as I trust, in full sympathy with him, however diverse from his views any of my own opinions may have been. Coming to such understanding of the work in hand — one whose accomplishment is now nearly a century old — my duty seemed to be to criticise the subject-matter from the standpoint of to-day, however copious might prove to be the additional information required, or to whatever extent the resulting commentary might be protracted. This part of my work is represented by the notes with which the present edition has been freighted, and which are typographically distinguished from the main text. These notes bespeak their own variety and perhaps comprehensiveness; but of their value or interest it is not for me to express any opinion.

Aside from this main exercise of an editorial function to the best of my ability, I have been induced to add another to the several good memoirs of Pike which we already possessed — notablyWhiting’s and Greely’s. In the preparation of this I have been able to avail myself of much hither to unpublished documentary material and other sources of information which have not before been utilized for this purpose. Under the circumstances of its present connection this biography could be prepared with little regard to Pike as an explorer, for these volumes cover all such ground; and thus I could dwell for the most part upon other aspects of his life and character, such as those which led up to his conspicuous adventures, and especially those of the War of 1812 which closed with his death a career of military honor and renown.

At the time when Pike first appeared in print, it was the fashion to regard an index to a book rather as an elegant superfluity, or a luxury of leisurely authorship, than as the imperative obligation and absolute necessity which we now find it to be, whenever anything else than fiction or poetry becomes a candidate for public favor. Pike has never been indexed before; and many who now see how lengthy is the list of proper names of persons, places, and other things, may for the first time become aware of the extent and variety of information of which this author’s work has proved to be either the prolific source or the pregnant occasion.

All of the plates which illustrated the original edition of Pike have been reproduced in facsimile. They consist of a portrait of the author and six maps. To these are now added a facsimile of an autograph letter, and a new map, both prepared expressly for the present edition. The letter requires no further remark than that it is believed to be the first one ever published, and that it is also printed in its proper connection in the text of my Memoir, with many other hitherto unpublished documents. The new map, which I have legended as a Historico-geographical Chart of the Upper Mississippi River, has been compiled and drawn under my direction by Mr. Daniel W. Cronin, a skillful draughts man of the U. S. Geological Survey, and is copy righted by my publisher. It is based primarily upon theMap of the Mississippi River from Lake Itasca to the Falls of St. Anthony, compiled from surveys and reconnoissances made under the direction of Major F. U. Farquhar and Captain Charles J. Allen, U. S. A., and from the U. S.Land Surveys, published in fifteen sheets, on the scale of inch to mile, by the Engineer Department of the Army, in 1881. The hydrographic data from this source are supplemented from the latest map of Minnesota published by theU. S. General Land Office, from the sectional maps of Minnesota and of the Upper Mississippi lately issued by Jewett and Son of St. Paul, and from various other sources, in protracting the branches of the main stream and locating the lakes, etc., beyond the area shown on the Engineer charts. The Jewett maps are the best ones I have seen among those published by private enterprise; the map of Minnesota for which a certain Chicago firm is responsible is the worst of all those which have appeared of late years.My corner-map of the Infant Mississippi or "CradledHercules," on a much larger scale than the rest, is reduced from Brower’s map of the Itasca State Park, with the author’s kind permission; the names given to the numerous features of the Itascan source of the Mississippi are those now officially recognized, with the addition of a few whichI have myself bestowed in the course of my notes on Pike, among other results of my recent tour of observation. In lettering the main part of this chart, my idea was, first, to illustrate Pike, by marking his camps with their dates, along the river, and also his trail, where he went overland; it is believed that this has been done with all the accuracy that a map of this scale permits, except for the route from Leech lake back to the Mississippi, which has never been — and probably never will be — ascertained with all desirable exactitude.Secondly, I intended to give the actual present names of all the natural and artificial features which are delineated; and thirdly, to add to these designations all the synonymy and other historical data which the map could conveniently carry. Though there is theoretically no endto the information of this kind which might be put upon a map, the practical limitations in any given case are obvious; and overcrowded lettering would be rather confusing than helpful to the reader. In general, the historical data which have been selected to be legended are in direct connection with and support of Pike’s text and of my commentary thereupon. Only those who have long experienced the practical difficulty of making a good printer or draughtsman misspell words in order to reproduce historical forms literally can appreciate the obstacles to complete success in such an undertaking; but I indulge the hope that this chart, whatever its imperfections may be, will be found useful enough to warrant the great pains which have been taken to approximate accuracy.

As in editing Lewis and Clark, so in working upon Pike,I have been encouraged and assisted by many friends, not all of whom have I the pleasure of knowing personally. I am under special obligations to Mr. Alfred J. Hill of St.Paul, Minn., whose knowledge of the history and geography of the Upper Mississippi region is not less accurate than extensive. Mr. Hill has been good enough to accompany me throughout Pt. 1 of the work, and give me the benefit of his close scrutiny of the press-proofs, in the form of constant suggestion and criticism, besides frequent references to other available sources of information which I might have overlooked. His valued co-operation to this extent increases very appreciably the confidence which the reader may feel in all that relates to the Mississippi Voyage.[NP-1]Mr. R. I. Holcombe, county historian of Missouri, now of the U. S. Marshal’s office in St. Paul, has criticised those pages of Pt. 2 which relate to the Osage river. The same friendly attentions have been bestowed upon the whole of Pike’s route in Colorado by Mr. Wm. M. Maguire of Denver; and upon various points concerning the pueblos of New Mexico and Arizona, by Mr. F. W. Hodge of theU. S. Bureau of Ethnology. Hon. J. V. Brower of St.Paul, Commissioner of the Itasca State Park, has made me free to use his map of the park in connection with the new historico-geographical chart of the Upper Mississippi. TheHon. the Secretaries of War and of State have granted permission to examine official archives of their respective Departments; this research, in the War Department, has been facilitated by Mr. John Tweedale, Chief Clerk, andMr. David Fitz Gerald, Librarian; in the State Department, by Mr. W. W. Rockhill, Chief Clerk; Mr. Andrew H.Allen, Chief of the Bureau of Rolls and Library, and Mr.Walter Manton of the same Bureau. Gen. A. W. Greely,Chief Signal Officer, U. S. Army; Gen. T. L. Casey, lateChief of Engineers, U. S. Army, and Mr. W. W. Winship,Chief Draughtsman of the same; Major J. W. Powell, lateDirector of the U. S. Geological Survey, and Director of the Bureau of Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution; Mr.Henry Gannett and Mr. A. H. Thompson of the sameSurvey; Prof. G. Brown Goode, Director of the U. S.National Museum, and Prof. Otis T. Mason of thatMuseum; Prof. Harry King, of the U. S. General LandOffice; Hon. D. M. Browning, Commissioner of Indian Affairs, and Mr. R. F. Thompson of the same Bureau; Mr.L. O. Howard, Chief of the Division of Entomology of the U. S. Department of Agriculture; Mr. A. R. Spofford,Librarian of Congress; Prof. N. H. Winchell, Director of the Geological Survey of Minnesota; Hon. Charles Aldrich,Curator of the Iowa State Historical Department; Mr.R. G. Thwaites, Secretary of the Historical Society of Wisconsin;Mr. D. L. Kingsbury, Acting Secretary of the Historical Society of Minnesota; Hon. C. C. James, Deputy Minister of Agriculture of Ontario, and Hon. A. Blue of the Bureau of Mines of Ontario, have each rendered valued official or personal favors, or both. I am also indebted in various ways, most of which are indicated in their respective connections in the course of my notes, to ex-President Benjamin Harrison; Mr. W. H. Harrison ofNorth Bend, O.; Mrs. B. H. Eaton of El Paso, Tex.; Governor A. W. McIntire of Colorado; R. T. Durrett, LL. D.,of Louisville, Ky.; Prof. E. D. Cope of Philadelphia; Mr.James Bain, Jr., of the Public Library of Toronto; Mr.L. P. Sylvain, Assistant Librarian of Parliament, Ottawa;Lieutenant J. R. Williams of the Third Artillery, U. S. A.;Lieutenant H. M. Chittenden of the Corps of Engineers,U. S. A.; Rev. O. S. Bunting of Trenton, N. J.; Prof. J. D.Butler of Madison, Wis.; Mr. W. P. Garrison of the NewYork Nation; Judge Thos. H. Bacon of Hannibal, Mo.;Judge Nathan Richardson of Little Falls, Minn.; Mr.Charles Hallock of Hallock, Minn.; Mr. H. D. Harrower ofNew York, N. Y.; Mr. T. H. Lewis of St. Paul, Minn.; Mr.C. H. Small of Pueblo, Col.; Mr. Geo. R. Buckman of Colorado Springs, Col.; Mr. D. Bosse of Great Bend, Kas., andMr. Luther R. Smith of Washington, D. C. Mrs. Mary B.Anderson of Washington, D. C., has taken great pains in preparing under my direction an index, of somewhat unusual extent and special difficulty, which I am led to believe will be found exceptionally accurate. Mr. Robert M.Trulan and Mr. H. E. Gore-Kelly of the Mershon Printing Company, Rahway, N. J., have read the proofs with untiring zeal as well as professional skill. Mr. Francis P. Harper has set no limit to the extent to which my editorial work might be protracted, leaving the substance of these volumes entirely to my discretion; and I have returned the compliment by deferring to his judgment in all that relates to the manufacture of a book which may be found worthy to stand by the side of Lewis and Clark.

Elliott Coues.

Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, D. C.,
June 30th, 1895.

MEMOIR OF

ZEBULON MONTGOMERY PIKE.

BY ELLIOTT COUES.


The best Life of Pike we have had is that which was prepared by Henry Whiting and published in 1845 in Jared Sparks’ Library of American Biography, vol. xv. (or new series vol. v.), pp. 217-314. This excellent memoir might be now reproduced, were it not mainly occupied with the account of those expeditions to which these volumes are devoted, and thus for the most part superfluous in the present connection. It still continues to be a main source of our information concerning the events of Pike’s life before and after those exploits of 1805-7 which immortalized his name, and is particularly valuable in all that relates to his closing career, as the biographer was himself a distinguished soldier and competent military critic.[M-1]

But I have much new matter to offer, derived from a thorough examination of the archives of the War Department, which include many original and hitherto unpublisheddocuments in Pike’s case,[M-2] from diligent search among contemporaneous records of the war of 1812-15, and from various other sources.


The Pike family resided in New Jersey for several generations. One Captain John Pike acquired his military title in Indian warfare. Zebulon Pike, the father of Zebulon Montgomery Pike, had been a captain in the Revolutionary army, and had served in the levies of 1791, when he was made a captain of infantry Mar. 5th, 1792; he was assigned to the Third sub-Legion Sept. 4th, 1792, and to the 3d Infantry Nov. 1st, 1796; he became major Mar. 21st, 1800, and was transferred to the 1st Infantry Apr. 1st, 1802; he was brevetted lieutenant-colonel July 10th, 1812, and honorably discharged June 15th, 1815. He died July 27th, 1834. His son, Zebulon Montgomery, was born at Lamberton, afterward a south part of Trenton, N. J.,Jan. 5th, 1779.[M-3]

During Zebulon Montgomery’s childhood his parents removed to a place in Bucks Co., Pa., near the Delaware river, and thence to Easton, Pa. Whiting saysthat he was remembered by some of his schoolmates who were living in 1845, "as a boy of slender form, very fair complexion, gentle and retiring disposition, but of resolute spirit. Instances are mentioned in which his combative energies were put to a test, which would reflect no discredit upon his subsequent career." He had only a common school education, which appears to have been as slight in quality as it was short in duration, though he was at onetime under the tuition of a Mr. Wall, a person of local repute in mathematics. He entered the army as a raw, shy country youth, of the most slender acquirements in any direction, whose main making of a man was ambition.

The records of young Pike’s earliest military service arevariant in some particulars not of much consequence. In one of his letters, printed beyond, p. lxv, he says that he entered the army when he was 15 years old. This would be in or about 1794, and doubtless refers to his cadetship.According to his biographer, he entered his father’s company as a cadet, date not given; was commissioned as an ensign of the 2d Infantry Mar. 3d, 1799; promoted to be a first lieutenant in the same regiment Apr. 24th, 1800, and arranged to the 1st Infantry in 1802. In Heitman’sHistorical Register[M-4] it appears that Zebulon MontgomeryPike, of New Jersey, was first appointed from New Jersey to be a second lieutenant of the 2d Infantry, Mar. 3d, 1799; was next promoted to be first lieutenant of the same regiment, Nov. 1st, 1799; and then transferred to the 1stInfantry, Apr. 1st, 1802. Whatever may have been the facts in the discrepant cases of the earlier dates, there is noun certainty from April 1st, 1802, when the name and rank became First Lieutenant Z. M. Pike, 1st Regiment ofU. S. Infantry. It was as such that this young officer was first detailed for detached service in the exploration of the Mississippi, by order of General James Wilkinson, dated from the Commanding General’s headquarters at St. Louis,Mo., July 30th, 1805.

Pike had not before been distinguished from any other meritorious and zealous subaltern, though his qualities had already attracted favorable attention. His selection byGeneral Wilkinson for this duty was the beginning of all his greatness. The letter in which the detail was made will be found elsewhere (vol. ii, pp. 842-844). The principal other dates of Pike’s brief but brilliant military career maybe conveniently given here, though in so doing I anticipate events which will come up again in their regular order: His promotion to a captaincy in his regiment occurred by routine Aug. 12th, 1806, when he was voyaging up the Osage, early in his second expedition. He became major of the 6th Infantry May 3d, 1808, in less than a year after his return from his tour in Mexico — a journey which was directly continuous with his second, or Arkansaw expedition, but one which, having been involuntarily performed, he chose to separate formally from the other, and to make known as his "third" expedition. He became the lieutenant-colonel of the 4th Infantry Dec. 31st, 1809.From Apr. 3d, 1812, to July 3d of that year, he was on duty as deputy quartermaster-general. He became the colonel of the 15th Infantry July 6th, 1812, and was appointed to be brigadier-general Mar. 12th, 1813. But before this appointment was confirmed General Pike had been killed at the head of the troops he led to the assault on York, Upper Canada, April 27th, 1813, aged 34 years, 3 months, 22 days.

I am favored by Lieutenant J. R. Williams, of the army, with the following copy of the rough draught of a hither to unpublished letter from General John R. Williams of Detroit to Major Amos Holton, giving an interesting picture of Pike, framed in his early environment:

Detroit, May 20, 1845.

Major Amos Holton,Dear Sir,

I have read your esteemed favor of the 14th April last, on the interesting subject of your contemplated publication of a Biographical memoir, illustrative of the Character and services of the late Brigadier Genl.Zebulon Montgomery Pike of the U. S. Army. The half Sheet of the Albany Argus which you designed to accompany your letter, and which gives an account of a night battle on the Champlain frontier, I regret to say, has not been received.

The period of my acquaintance with the subject of your contemplated memoir, is indeed distant and remote; and altho’ those days are still cherished in my recollection as the halcyon and pristine days of my youth and vigor, Yet, I cannot but be truly sensible that many interestingincidents have escaped my recollection in the lapse of forty-five years.

Soon after my arrival at Camp Allegheny in the month of May 1800 I became acquainted with Lieut. Zebulon Montgomery Pike of the 2d Regt. U. S. Infy, he was shortly afterwards appointed Adjutant of the Regiment, in which Capacity he served during the Years 1800 & 1801.No officer could be more attentive prompt and efficient in the execution of the several duties of his office — nor was there any more emulous to acquire a perfect knowledge of the Military profession, nor more zealous, ardent and persevering in the pursuit of scientific improvement.

It was these qualities and disposition of mind that laid the foundation of the subsequent Character and fame of Zebulon M. Pike and would probably have introduced him had he lived, to the highest honors, at least, in the military profession under the Republic.

I then understood that his only means of Education had been such as could be obtained in Garrison under the eye of his father then Major Pike at the several posts he commanded, not withstanding these disadvantages he was a tolerable good english scholar and wrote a good hand when I knew him and had also acquired by his own persevering industry a tolerably good knowledge of the french language — this I know from the fact of having frequently corrected, at his own request, several of his translations from Fenelon’s Telemachus.

Pike was very gentlemanly in his deportment — manners agreeable &polished, rather reserved in general and somewhat taciturn except when incited to conversation on some topic in which he felt interest and considered worthy of his attention he had less levity in his character than even many of his brother officers Senior to him in Years and Rank. His appearance was military yet somewhat peculiar he generally leaned or inclined his head on one side so that the tip of his Chapeau touched his right shoulder when on parade — His Stature was about five feet eight inches tolerably square and robust for his Age which I think must have been Twenty Years in 1800. His Complexion was then Ruddy, eyes blue, light hair and good features his habits were in keeping with his character, uniformly abstemious and temperate his attention to duty unremitted. At that period the most vexatious evil and obstacle that attended the maintenance of discipline in the Army was the general and extensive use of Ardent Spirits, Whiskey among the Men which was constantly being introduced in Camp by the Men & Women attached to the service and other hangers on around the Camp — On one occasion returning to Camp from Pittsburgh about ten o’clock in the evening Pike and myself being desirous of detecting the Soldiers in their Clandestine manoeuvres in the introduction of whiskey approaching the Camp silently through the bushes and occasionally halting to listen succeededin capturing several fellows with jugs & bottles of their favorite beverage, not however without a race after them. On another occasion while going down the Ohio river in flats — The flats always halted for the night at some convenient place furnishing good ground & conveniences for Bivouacking for the Night a guard being mounted and Sentinels placed at suitable points around the Camp. The Soldiers were then permitted to Land build fires and bivouac on shore if they thought proper to do so in preference to remaining in the flats crowded as they were — there was about 70 men detailed for the purpose of managing Ten flats containing the Provisions under my Charge. The Signal for embarking in theMorning was the Reveille at day break and the General immediately after. It being then about the 20 December the weather was Cold and a good deal of ice drifting in the River. The men generally preferred the Company boats where they had to labor less than in those of the Commissariat where they had to labor constantly to keep up in the line agreeably to the order regulating the movement of the troops. One morning they appeared to be desirous of escaping from the Commissariat boats to their respective Company boats in hopes of getting rid of the duty to which they were detailed and left the boats as fast as they were ordered to embark until Pike observing their disobedience seized and threw several fire brans at those in the Act of leaving the boats to which they had been detailed and called to me to assist him by which means the men were taught a lesson which was not required to be repeated the residue of the journey down the River.

This prompt and decided course on the part of Pike was not only well timed but very important as it prevented much disorder and Confusion which would inevitably have ensued had he taken the ordinary and regular but slow steps to punish the Mutineers, to bring them to a sense of duty. the moment of departure had arrived, the boats were unmoored, and those which had precedence were already under way floating down the rapid current of the Ohio; The Colonels boat particularly, to whom he would have had to Report was already at some distance — The alternative then, which he adopted as quick as lightning was not only judicious but necessary and indispensible under the Circumstances of the Case. It operated a Salutary and instantaneous effect upon the insubordinate Soldiery which at once brought them to a sense of duty and order. This circumstance in my opinion speaks volumes in favor of Pike. The quickness and decision which characterized the transaction furnishes an index to his character neither to be mistaken nor misunderstood.

After our arrival at a point equidistant between Fort Massac & the Confluence of the Ohio & Mississippi Rivers, about eighteen miles below Fort Massac the Army landed on the 5th January 1801 at a high Bluffon the right Bank of the River where they encamped cleared the ground which was covered with heavy timber laid out an encampment after the plan of Greenville built with log huts which was named Wilkinsonville.

Some time in the summer of 1801 he obtained a furlow to visit Cincinnatias it was believed, on a matrimonial expedition at which time he was married to his present relict Mrs. Pike.

During the period alluded to, the duties of the Adjutant were arduous and unremitting — especially during the encampment on the Allegheny in addition to guard and police duty — We had Battalion drill twice or thrice a week and Company drill every day; and Officer drill once or twice a week, thus you can perceive that our time was industriously appropriated to the acquisition of military knowledge — We had also the advantage of being drilled by officers that served under the gallant Genl. Wayne and who composed part of his Army at the memorable and decisive Battle of the 20th of August 1794 at the Miami Rapids —

Colonel John Francis Hamtramck[M-5] of the 1st Regt U. S. Infy acted as Brigadier Genl. under Genl. Wilkinson being the senior Colonel of theU. S. Army — his remains now lie within a stone’s throw of my Office, near the Roman Catholic Church of St Anne — As a Memorial of affection the principal Town above this City and within the County of Waynebears his name Hamtramck as he was much beloved by the inhabitants of this Country.

Allow me here to make mention of the principal Officers composing the Command at Camp Allegheny. Colo. David Strong, Commandg2d Regt Infy, Major Moses Porter with his Co. of Artillery — MajorTurner Brigade Inspector Captains Graeton, Sedgwick, Shoemaker,(Visscher, stationed at fort Fayette) Grey, Lukens, Claiborne — Lieuts.Rand, Whipple, Schiras, Hook, Meriwether Lewis, Wilson — John Wilson — Z.M. Pike, Dill — & to which was added at Wilkinsonville Lieuts.Williams, Brevoort, Hughes, Hilton Many Blue & Others together with a Battalion of the 4th Regt. under Major Butler — making in the aggregate a force of about 1000 effective men.[M-6]

During the summer and autumn we were visited by Genl. Wilkinson &his staff Composed of Lieuts Walbach & Macomb & Lieut. Colo. Williamsof the Engineer Corps.[M-7] about this period sickness among the troops and many deaths occurred in consequence of which the Troopswere removed by order of Genl. Wilkinson to Cumberland Heights[*] a season of inactivity and a prospect unfavorable to Military life prevailing — many Officers resigned and sought to obtain a livelihood by other means than the profession of arms. These and other subsequent events are matters of history and I shall therefore close these short notes by pointing to the subsequent life and services of the lamented Zebulon M.Pike.

My opportunities of acquaintance with him arose from the Circumstance of having messed with Captain Peter Shoemaker and himself about Eight Months without intermission we three being the only members of the Mess.

In conclusion, it may not be inappropriate to remark that the period alluded to was during a state of peace. Yet, whilst the prospect lastedthat the Troops might soon expect active service against the frontiers of the then possessions of Spain — The Zeal, Ardor, Enterprize and ambition of our Army could not have been surpassed; and would have sustained a comparison with the best and most glorious days of the Revolution, or of the late War with Britain, or the later achievements of our Braves against the forces of Mexico.

You are at liberty to use these notes in such manner as will meet the object you have in view.

With respectful Consideration
I am Dear Sir Your Obedt Servt
Jno. R. Williams.

Major Amos Holton
Washington City, D. C.

transmitted the foregoing by Mail Augt 26th 1846.[M-8]

[*] Mr. Jefferson having been elected President of the U. S. The policy of the Government changed instead of wresting the posts on the west bank of the Mississippi from Spain by force of Arms as was previously contemplated — They were eventually obtained by peaceable & Successful negotiation. (Orig. note.)

The "matrimonial expedition" to which the foregoing letter quaintly alludes was successful, like Pike’s other expeditions of later date and greater celebrity. The young lieutenant was married in 1801 (day of the month not ascertained)to Clarissa Brown, daughter of General John Brown of Kentucky. Whiting says that the issue of this connection was "three daughters and one son. Only one of these children reached the maturity of life, a daughter, who married Symmes Harrison, the son of General [William Henry]Harrison, and became a widow, many years since, with several children." Whiting continues with the following statements, embodying perhaps as much as has hither to been published of Pike’s domestic relations:

Mrs. Pike withdrew to the seclusion of a family residence [at NorthBend] on the Ohio River just below Cincinnati, soon after the fall of her gallant husband, where she has since lived. It is well recollected by most of the officers who served on Lake Ontario in the early part of the campaign of 1813, that he regarded her with enthusiastic sentiments, believing her to share in all his ardent longings after distinction, and willing to make any sacrifice for their fulfilment. No doubt it was with a heart strengthened by such feelings, that she parted with him on the eve of the expedition in which he fell; though she may have felt, during her long widowhood, that the sacrifice, with all its honorable alleviations, has been at times as much as that heart could bear.

There was found an interesting memorandum on one of the blank pages of a copy of "Dodsley’s Economy of Human Life,"[M-9] which GeneralPike habitually carried about with him. After affectionately alluding to his wife, and his son then living, he lays down two maxims, which he wishes may ever be present to the mind of his child, "as he rises from youth to manhood." "First: Preserve your honor free from blemish. Second: Be always ready to die for your country." This son was cut off too soon to exemplify the former in his life, or the latter in his death; but the father, in his life and in his death, exemplified them both.

On seeking for information in regard to General Pike’s daughter and her children, I first wrote to ex-President Benjamin Harrison, by whom I was favored with prompt reply, in part as follows:

674 North Delaware Street,
Indianapolis, Ind., May 24, 1894.

My Dear Sir:

I have your letter of May 21st. My uncle, Symmes Harrison, married the daughter of General Pike and left several children; but I do not think I know of but one who survives — William Henry Harrison, who lives in the neighborhood of the old Pike homestead on the Ohio River, about two and a half miles below my grandfather’s old home at NorthBend.... I cannot give you the names of General Pike’s children; I was too young to have any knowledge of them. Possibly my eldest sister,Mrs. Bettie H. Eaton, who is now residing at El Paso, Texas, may be able to give you some information about the Pike family.

Very truly yours,
[Signed] Benjamin Harrison.

Mrs. Bettie Harrison Eaton was kind enough to reply to my further inquiries, in a letter dated El Paso, Tex., July 2d, 1894, from which I quote in substance:

My cousin’s, William Henry Harrison’s, mother was a daughter of General Pike, whose maiden name was Clarissa Harlowe Pike. She was married to my uncle, John Cleves Symmes Harrison, but in what year I do not know. Indeed, I know very little about the Pike family,as I always understood that my aunt was General Pike’s only child; if he had others I never heard of them. I remember her very slightly, as I was quite a little girl when she died. Her mother, Mrs. General Pike, of whom I have a better memory, was a tall, dignified, rather austere looking woman, who always dressed in deep black, wearing always a large black Canton crape shawl and a black crape turban on her head, which to my childish eyes gave her a somewhat awe-inspiring appearance.She was a highly educated and accomplished woman, and a fine French scholar. She kept for many years a diary, which was written in French.My cousin, to whom I refer you, lives on the old Pike homestead, and could probably give you the dates you wish, as he no doubt has the family Bible, and the old graveyard where the family are buried is on the place.

On applying to William Henry Harrison of North Bend,O., I received a brief note dated Sept. 10th, 1894, in which the following information is given: "My house burned some years ago, when all General Pike’s private papers were lost. He had but one child, my mother Clara. His wife’s maiden name was Clara Brown; she was the daughter of Captain John Brown of Revolutionary fame."

With thus much — none too complete, but all that I have in hand — concerning Pike’s private life, we return to his public career. The unnumbered extant notices to which the fame that he acquired gave rise are mainly and most naturally devoted to the consideration of the Mississippian,Arkansan, and Mexican exploits which form the matter of the present volumes, but which need not occupy the present biographer, as they speak for themselves. These cover the dates of 1805-6-7; and before taking up Pike’s life in 1808, we may next consider the bibliography of the books to which his expeditions gave rise.

The earliest one of these, forerunner of the regular edition of 1810, is entitled:

An Account | of a | Voyage | up the Mississippi River, from St. |Louis to its source; | made under the orders of the War De- |partment, by Lieut. Pike, of the Uni- | ted States Army, in theYears 1805 and | 1806. Compiled from Mr. Pike’s Jour- | nal. |

Pamphlet, 8vo., pp. 1-68, no date, no author, no editor, no publisher, no printer, no place of publication; title, verso blank, pp. 1, 2; text, pp. 3-67, with colophon ("Finis."); p. 68 being "Extract of a letter from N. Boilvin [Nicholas Boivin] Indian agent, | to the Secretary of War, dated St. Louis, | Oct, 6, 1806. |"

This is an extremely rare tract. I have handled two copies, one of which I own, title page gone; the other being a perfect example in the Library of Congress at Washington. There is a third in the Ridgway Library of Philadelphia; and Sabin’s Bibl. Amer. cites a fourth, in the library of the American Antiquarian Society at Worcester,Mass. These are all that I know of, though of course others exist. The authorship and circumstances of publication remain unknown, to me at least. Sabin gives the date 1807; this is probably correct, certainly true within a year, but questionable. I adopt it, in view of its probability, and in the absence of conclusive evidence against it, though Whiting says 1808. But early in 1808 Pike was already arranging for the publication of his own book, which appeared in 1810. Pike does not even allude to this publication, either in his own book, or in any of the manuscripts I have seen in which the latter is mentioned. On consultation with Mr. A. R. Spofford over the general aspect and "make-up," no definite conclusion could be reached by that exceptionally well-versed librarian. It is supposed by some, not without plausibility, to have been a government publication; but Mr. Spofford’s ignorance of the fact, if it be such, is against this supposition; for a publication which he cannot recognize on sight as having been issued in Washington is unlikely. The tract looks as if it formed a part of something else; witness the peculiar set of the title page, the conclusion of the Pike matter on p. 67, and the appearance on p. 68 of the Boivin letter, having no obvious connection with the rest.However all this may really have been, there is no question of the genuineness of this unauthenticated narrative.Pike never penned it — he could not write so well as theanonymous author of this tract did. But whoever wrote it had Pike’s original manuscript journal or note-book before him, and followed him closely, faithfully, and accurately.Pike’s case is put in the third person by the writer, who gives in narrative form a better account of the Mississippi voyage than Pike’s slender literary attainments enabled him to write for himself. This "text of 1807," as I shall call it, when I have occasion to cite it in my commentary, is an invaluable check upon Pike’s own itinerary; he cannot have been unaware of its existence, and the friendly hand which thus first gave to the world the best account extant of the Mississippi voyage should not have been ignored when Pike came to write out his notes for publication in the princeps edition of his several expeditions, of date 1810.[M-10]

Immediately upon his escape from his Spanish captor sand hosts, and his return to his native land, Pike set about writing his book. This was finished — or at any rate so far advanced that a contract for its publication had been made — early in 1808 (see letter of May 27th, 1808, beyond, p. lxi).The original edition of his Expeditions is as follows:

[1810.] — An Account of Expeditions | to the | Sources of the Mississippi, | and through the | Western Parts of Louisiana, | to theSources of the | Arkansaw, Kans, La Platte, and Pierre | Jaun,Rivers; | performed by order of the | Government of the UnitedStates | during the years 1805, 1806, and 1807. | And a Tour through | the | Interior Parts of New Spain, | when conducted through these Provinces, | by order of | the Captain-General, | in the Year 1807. | — — | By Major Z. M. Pike. | Illustrated by maps and charts. | — — | Philadelphia: | Published by C. and A.Conrad, Co. No. 30, Chesnut Street. Somer- | vell & Conrad,Petersburgh. Bonsal, Conrad, & Co. Norfolk, | and FieldingLucas, Jr. Baltimore. | — — | John Binns, Printer......1810. |One Vol. 8vo.

CONTENTS.

Portrait of Pike, frontispiece.

Title, backed with copyright, pp. [1], [2].

To the Public, being Preface by Pike and publisher’s Apology, pp. [3]-[5];blank, p. [6].

Dedication, To the President and Members of the U. S. M. P. S., one leaf not paginated, verso blank (= pp. 7, 8).

Part I., being the Mississippi Voyage: Pike’s Itinerary, pp. 1-105; blank, p. 106; Meteorological Tables, 5 unnumbered leaves, raising pages to 116, last blank.

Part II., being the Arkansaw Journey: Instructions to Pike, pp. 107-110;Pike’s Itinerary, pp. 111-204.

Part III., being the Mexican Tour: Pike’s Itinerary, pp. 205-277; p. 278 blank; one blank leaf; Meteorological Table, one unpaged leaf.

Appendix to Part I., pp. 1-66 (last not numbered) + 2 folding Tables; contains Documents Nos. 1-18, and some others (No. 18, pp. 41-66, is Observations, etc., on the Mississippi Voyage); the folders areTables C and F (other tables being on pages), respectively to face p.40 and p. 66.

Appendix to Part II., pp. 1-53 (p. 54 blank), + 1 folding Table to face p.53; contains (No. 1) A Dissertation, etc., on the Arkansaw Journey, pp. 1-18; (No. 2) Lieut. Wilkinson’s Report on his Arkansaw Expedition, pp. 19-32; and other Documents to No. 15.

Appendix to Part III., pp. 1-87 (p. 88 blank); contains (No. 1) Geographical,Statistical, and General Observations, etc., on the MexicanTour, pp. 1-51, by far the most important thing in the book; No. 2,pp. 52, 53, a certain Vocabulary belonging to the Mississippi Voyage, and therefore to App. to Part I.; with other Documents toNo. 19.

Map, Falls of St. Anthony, page size.

Map, Mississippi river, about 29 — — — 9 inches.

Map, the First Part of Pike’s Chart of Louisiana, folding, about 17½ — — 17½ inches, called Plate I.

Map, the Second Part of Pike’s Chart of Louisiana, folding, about 17 — — 15½ inches, called Plate II.

Map, Internal Provinces of New Spain, about 18¼ — — 17¾ inches.

Map, Sketch of the Vice royalty of New Spain, about 15 — — — 12 — inches.

Total pages 8 + 278 + 10 + 4 + 66 + 54 + 88 = 508, some not paginated, a few blank; 5 sets of pagination. Inserts 1 portrait, 3 folding tables, 6 maps (5 folding) = 10. Folders all may be found in a separate vol. in some copies.

It has been said, "The pen is mightier than the sword."Pike’s pen proved mightier than his sword, and pistols too, in putting bookmaking to confusion and editors to despair.It would be hard to find a match for the disorder in which Pike’s materials were set forth in print, especially in the several Appendixes: Even the patient printer would not let it go without published apology. No editor has hither to been found expert or rash enough to reproduce anything like the original arrangement of the "Parts," "Appendixes"with their numerous pieces, folding "Tables," etc. The English editor, who first undertook to bring something like cosmos out of this chaos, created a new book by weaving as much as he could of the matter of the Appendixes into the main text, or into footnotes thereto, thereby greatly reducing the bulk of the appendicial texts. But these contained documents which proved refractory to such treatment; the plan could not be fully carried out, for there was a residuum which still called for an Appendix. In fact, the real bulk of Pike’s cargo is in these Appendixes; his Itineraries — the only portions of his book which were printed in large type, as main text — being less important, if not less interesting, than the rest of the freight. In approaching my own editorial labors, my intention was to adhere as closely as possible to the arrangement of the original. This I flatter myself I have succeeded in doing, with a few important exceptions to which attention is pointedly directed in my notes. These transpositions, with the introduction of chapter-heads,and co-ordination of all of the original book in uniform typography, have probably effected the required result.

In 1811 Pike’s work was also published, from another MS. copy, with many modifications, in a handsome quarto edition, as follows:

[1811.] — Exploratory Travels | through the | Western Territories | of | North America: | comprising a | Voyage from St. Louis, on the Mississippi, | to the | Source of that River, | and a | Journey through the Interior of Louisiana, | and the | North-eastern Provinces of New Spain. | Performed in the years 1805, 1806, 1807, by Order of the Government of the United States. | — — | By Zebulon Montgomery Pike, | Major 6th Regt. United States Infantry. | — — | London: | Printed for Longman, Hurst, Rees,Orme, and Brown, | Paternoster-Row. | — — | 1811. |

One vol., 4 to. Half-title, 1 leaf, verso blank; title, 1 leaf, verso blank; advertisement, dated Jan. 28th, 1811, and signed Thomas Rees, pp.v-ix; Congressional matters taken from the App. to Part III. of the orig. ed., pp. xi-xviii; contents, pp. xix, xx; main text, pp. 1-390;Appendix, pp. 391-436; colophon, J. G. Barnard, Printer, Skinner-street,London. The copy examined has only two maps — the Mississippi, reduced to 4 to page size; Louisiana and New Mexico, prepared by putting together two of Pike’s orig. maps and reducing the result to 10 — ; — — 13 — inches. Folding tables reset to page size.

This is the standard English edition, prepared under the careful and able editorship of Dr. Thomas Rees, from a manuscript copy transmitted to England at the time that the original manuscript went to press in America. This edition, and not the American of 1810, is the basis of the French and Dutch versions, and is also the one which was textually reprinted as the Denver edition of 1889. Dr. Reesmade Pike a much better book than the author made for himself. The very great differences from the American original, due to the English editor’s literary skill, are modestly set forth in the latter’s Advertisement. It appears from this that the MS. transmitted to England "was divided into six parts, comprising the three journals which follow, and the observations pertaining to each in a separate portion."As the appendicial matters were received "in the desultorymanner in which they were originally composed, the editor judged it for the advantage of the work to restore them, as nearly as he possibly could, in distinct paragraphs, to the places they had first occupied in the journal, thus rendering it unnecessary to lead the reader a second time over the same ground." In other words, Dr. Rees picked the helter-skelter Appendixes to pieces, and wove most of their contents into the main text, as already said. The accounts of the Indians on the Upper Mississippi, and the Observations on New Spain, he "preserved in their original state. The Notes and Appendixes, with some variation of arrangement, have been printed after the manuscripts, but a few articles have been omitted, as containing only repetitions of what had already appeared in the body of the work. With respect to the language and style of the Author, the Editor felt he had a much more delicate task to perform than in the disposal of the materials." He therefore preserved Pike’s language in substance, but corrected his grammar freely. Dr. Rees’ avowal of the trouble he had with proper names of persons and places will surprise no one who reads the present edition and sees with what extraordinary perversions of Indian, French, and Spanish names both Dr.Rees and myself had to contend. Dr. Rees speaks also of the "ignorant and careless transcriber" of the copy which reached him, and observes further: "It is mortifying to find that in America, where the Author was accessible, and might readily have elucidated any accidental obscurities in his manuscript, the work has been printed in very nearly as incorrect a state as it appeared in the present editor’s copy.The sheets of the American Edition reached here some time after his own had been in the printer’s hands, but its numerous errors, discreditable certainly to the American press, left him little to regret that they had not arrived at an earlier period." For the rest, Dr. Rees remarks that he furnished "some cursory notes, which are distinguished by the letter E," and adds: "In the account of New Spain he has subjoined the population of several places from Humboldt’srecent ’Essai Politique,’ in order to furnish the reader with the means of instant comparison. It is pleasing to observe how nearly these statements agree in the most material instances; and the circumstance affords no slight evidence of the general accuracy of Major Pike’s information." He is charitable enough to refrain from adding what else this circumstance evidences. Dr. Rees’ further introduction to his main text consists of the Congressional papers, which in the orig. ed. form a part of the App. to Pt. 3, and which are given this prominence, apparently, to authenticate the whole work in the eyes of the English public by these officialities. In the copy of the Rees edition which I have handled I find but two maps, reduced as above said.

This was followed in 1812 by a French version, the title and collation of which are here given:

[1812] — Voyage | au | Nouveau-Mexique, | a la suite a’une expéditionordonnée | par le Gouvernement des — ‰tats-Unis, | pour reconnoîtreles sources des rivières | Arkansas, Kansès, la Platte et Pierre-jaune,| dans l’intérieur de la Louisiane occidentale. | Précédé| a’une Excursion aux Sources du Mississippi, | Pendant lesannées 1805, 1806, et 1807. | Par le Major Z. M. Pike. | Traduitde l’anglais | Par M. Breton, Auteur de la Biblioth. géographique.| Orné d’une Nouvelle Carte de la Louisiane, en trois parties. |Tome Premier [Second]. | A Paris, | Chez D’Hautel, Libraire,Rue de la Harpe, no. 80, | près le Collége de Justice. | — | 1812. |

Two vols., 8vo. Vol. I., pp. i-xvi, 1-368; Vol. II., pp. 1-373, with 3maps. In Vol. I. the half title p., backed de l’imprimérie de L.Hausmann, Rue de la Harpe, No. 80, is pp. i, ii; full title p., versoblank, is pp. iii, iv; Préface du Traducteur, pp. v-xiv; sub-title,Voyage au Mississippi, backed with errata, pp. xv, xvi; Avertissement de l’auteur, pp. 1-6; Wilkinson’s instructions to Pike of July 30th, 1805, abstracted from one of the pieces of App. to Pt. 3 of the orig. ed., pp. 7, 8; main text of the Mississippi Voyage, pp. 9-236, ending Pt. 1 of the orig. ed.; thence the Arkansaw Journey, with separate sub-title, Voyage au Nouveau-Mexique, pp. 237-368, endingVol. I., with end of Pt. 2 of the orig. ed. — In Vol. II., half title p. backed blank, pp. 1, 2: full title, backed blank, pp. 3, 4; main text, pp. 5-373, beginning at date of Feb. 27th, 1807, when Pike was starting on his involuntary Mexican tour; this tour ending onp. 236, with end of the main text of Pt. 3 of the orig. ed.; thence to end of vol. various matters from the Appendixes of Pts. 2 and 3, including Lieutenant Wilkinson’s Arkansaw Report, pp. 325-363, and a piece of padding, pp. 293-324, this last being Remarques Additionelles sur le sol, les productions et les habitans de la Nouvelle-Espagne, of which the editor says that "ces détails sontex traits en partie de l’excellente histoire d’Amérique par Winterbotham,et de l’ouvrage de l’abbé Clavigéro." These 32 pages of padding have no business in the book; I suppose they were wanted to balance the bulk of the two volumes. The maps of this edition are three in number, supposed to belong in Vol. II. They are the Mississippi and the two Arkansaw maps, prepared by Antoine Nau, redrawn and re-engraved, with French names instead of English ones; the size is about the same as that of the original; the execution is rather better. The editor apologizes, Vol I., p. xiii, for not reproducing Pike’s two maps of Mexico, because he would not venture "d’attenter à la propriété de M. de Humboldt," i. e.,steal Humboldt’s thunder. For it seems that Humboldt thoughtPike had done so, and he had just previously so expressed himself in a réclamation in Le Moniteur. Humboldt compliments Pike proformâ, and proceeds to protest: "Mais les cartes du Mexique,publiées sous son [Pike’s] nom, ne sont que des réductions de magrande carte de la Nouvelle-Espagne, sur laquelle le voyageur atracé sa route de Santa-Fé par Cohahuila à Nacodolhes[Nacogdoches or Natchitoches]."

Humboldt’s direct and unqualified charge of plagiarism against Pike, which has never been answered and is probably unanswerable, is reiterated in that one of his works entitled: Personal Narrative of Travels to the Equinoctial Regions of the New Continent during the Years 1799-1804.By Alexander de Humboldt and Aimé Bonpland. Writtenin French by Alexander de Humboldt, and translated into English by Helen Maria Williams, Philadelphia, M. Carey,1 vol., 8vo, Dec. 23d, 1815, on p. xxii of which we read:"Mr. Pike displayed admirable courage in an important undertaking for the investigation of western Louisiana; but unprovided with instruments, and strictly watched on the road from Santa Fe to Natchitoches, he could do nothing towards the progress of the geography of the provincias internas. The maps of Mexico, which are annexed to thenarrative of his journey, are reduced from my great map ofNew Spain, of which I left a copy, in 1804, at the secretary of state’s office at Washington." In this connection Humboldt also makes the same well-founded charge against Arrowsmith, saying, p. xxi: "My general map of the kingdom of New Spain, formed on astronomical observations, and on the whole of the materials which existed in Mexico in 1804, has been copied by Mr. Arrowsmith, who has appropriated it to himself, by publishing it on a larger scale under the title of New Map of Mexico, compiled from original Documents, by Arrowsmith. It is very easy to recognize this map from the number of chalcographical errors with which it abounds," etc.

Of all forms of dishonesty, literary larceny is the most futile, because the surest of detection. Plagiarism is worse than a crime — it is a blunder. If the matter stolen is worths tealing, the transaction is certain to be exposed, sooner or later. The distinction between the use and misuse of the literary labors of another is so plain and simple that it cannot be misunderstood. It depends solely upon whether acknowledgment be made or not. Plagiarism acknowledged is no plagiarism — one has only to say "by your leave," to appropriate with impunity whatever he desires. But this instant formula is indispensable. Subsequent apology or explanation is impossible. Humboldt took Pike red-handed; this the present biographer deplores; but he can neither discover nor invent a defense. Pike’s senselessness in this matter aggravates the offense. To have acknowledged his indebtedness to Humboldt and Bonpland, and then utilized their work to any extent he chose, would have been shrewd policy, as well as honest conduct; for Humboldt’s was already a name to conjure with, and the hitherto nameless young writer could not have done better for himself than to cite such high authority in connection with his own work.[M-11] I have reluctantly satisfied myself thatPike’s map of New Spain is no other than Humboldt’s CarteGénérale du Royaume de la Nouvelle Espagne, with Nau’serrors and some little further modification.

The Dutch edition of Pike, 1812-13, is as follows:

[1812-13.] — Reize | naar | Nieuw-Mexico | en de Binnenlanden van| Louisiana, | Voorgegaan door eenen togt | naar de Bronnender | Mississippi, | gedaan op last van het Gouver- | nement derVereenigde Staten | in de jaren 1805, 1806 en 1807, | door denMajoor | Z. M. Pike. | — | Uit het Engelsch vertaald. | — | Eerste[Tweede] Deel. | met Kaarten. | — | Te Amsterdam, bij | C. Timmer.| MCDCCCXII [MDCCCXIII]. | Stilsteeg, No. 18. |

Two vols., 8vo. Vol. I., 1812 (notice misprint of date on title page),pp. i-viii, 1-327. Vol. II., 1813, two prel. leaves, and pp. 1-374, with three maps. Printed at Amsterdam by A. Breeman & Co.In Vol. I., title leaf, verso blank, pp. i, ii; Voorberigt van denVertaler (Translator’s Preface), pp. iii-viii, dated Amsterdam, Nov.7th, 1812; main text, pp. 1-327, of which the Mississippi voyage runs to p. 218 inclusive, and the remainder finishes the Arkansas journey, these being respectively Pt. 1 and Pt. 2 of the orig. ed. InVol. II. a half title and a full title make each one unpaged leaf, and the main text runs pp. 1-374, being Pt. 3 of the orig. ed. The three maps belong in this vol.

The general form and style of this version are most like those of the French translation, from which, however, the Dutch differs in various particulars. It appears to have been based upon the English quarto rather than upon the original Philadelphia octavo, and to have been translated independently there from, as the French also was. Both the Dutch and the French editions follow the English one in working the matter of the Appendixes into the main text — in fact, no edition that I know of has hitherto followed the awkward and exasperating form of Pike’s ownbook. The anonymous Dutch translator introduces a new preface, and a few short footnotes, not reproducing those of the French translator; the three maps are re-engraved from those prepared by Antoine Nau, as in the French edition, but with lettering of the names in Dutch instead ofFrench.

The foregoing English, French, and Dutch editions were speedily followed by a German version. This seems to be a scarce book; I have not yet been able to find a copy. I presume that, like the French and Dutch, it was modeled upon the London quarto; but with what modifications, if any, aside from translation into another language, I have no idea.

The latest and best edition of Pike which has hither to appeared in the United States, was published in 1889, as follows:

[1889.] Exploratory Travels | through the | Western Territories | of| North America: | comprising a | Voyage from St. Louis, on the Mississippi, | to the | Source of that river, | and a | Journey through the Interior of Louisiana, | and the | North-eastern Provinces of New Spain. | Performed in the years 1805, 1806, 1807,by Order of the Government of the United States. | — | By Zebulon Montgomery Pike, | Major 6th Regt. United States Infantry.| — | London: | Paternoster-Row. | — | 1811. | — | Denver:| W. H. Lawrence & Co. | 1889. |

One vol., large 4to. Engr. portrait, front is piece, answering to pp. i, ii; title, verso copyright, pp. iii, iv; introduction (new, by Wm. M.Maguire, Denver, 1889), pp. v-xii; missing, pp. xiii, xiv; Report of Committee, etc. (1808), pp. xv-xxii (abstracted from Doc. No. 6 and accompanying papers of Appendix III. of the original); contents, pp. xxiii, xxiv, or pp. 23, 24; main text, pp. 25-351; blank, p. 352; Appendix, pp. 353-394; Mississippi map, reduced, opp. p.24; 1st Louisiana map, reduced, opp. p. 146; 2d do., do., opp. p.208; maps of Falls of St. Anthony and of Mexico not found; folding tables reset to page size.

As appears from the foregoing title and collation, this is a faithful and complete reprint of the English quarto.The title page is facsimiled with the camera, down to thepublishers’ names; the text is identical throughout, barring such slight literal or punctual differences as are necessarily incident to resetting type. The only noticeable change from the London edition is that Dr. Rees’ advertisement is replaced by a new introduction, from the pen of William M. Maguire, Esq., of Denver. This is a valuable feature; my only regret is that so competent and conscientious an editor as Mr. Maguire — one familiar with much of Pike’s route, and enthusiastic on the subject — did not give the work that extended critical revision which would have forestalled my own commentary and left me to exercise my editorial wits in some other direction. As it is, I am indebted to my valued correspondent in several particulars which appear in their proper connections in the course of my notes.

It is needless to cite here the multiplied notices of Pike and of his travels or his book which appear in ordinary biographical and encyclopedic publications. But, aside from Whiting’s Memoir, already adduced, I may notice some special articles of more or less recent date.

The Pacific Railroad Reports, XI. 1855, pp. 19-22, contain a notice of Pike’s Expeditions, by the late eminent geographer,General Gouverneur Kemble Warren. The routes are traced correctly, except in the instance of sending Pike over the Continental Divide to head waters of the Colorado of the West; for General Warren says: "It appears that Lieutenant Pike has the honor of being the first American explorer that reached the sources of this large river [theArkansaw], and the second that crossed the divide between the waters of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans." The first clause of this statement is correct; in the second, the writer was misled.

"Mungo-Meri-Paike" is not the name of the celebrated Ethiopian explorer who was born at Fowlshiels, in Selkirkshire,Scotland, Sept. 20th, 1771, and became known to fame as Mungo Park, but a phonetization of the way "Montgomery Pike" reverberated in Spanish ears. Colonel JamesF. Meline’s Two Thousand Miles on Horseback, etc., New York, Hurd and Houghton, 1867, exploits Pike in an interesting manner, especially in Letter xxix, pp. 234-245.Meline’s contribution to the present biography is particularly valuable, as it gives some documentary evidence of the Spanish view of Pike’s invasion of New Mexico. Most of this we have in Pike’s book; but one of the papers which Colonel Meline presents, both in the original Spanish and in an English version, must find a place here; I give it in English, from Meline’s pp. 243-245.[M-12] It is GovernorAllencaster’s report to General Salcedo, of date Santa Fé,N. M., Apr. 1st, 1807: compare Pike at p. 607 and following pages; also, p. 809.

The Topeka Common wealth, a Kansan newspaper, during the summer and autumn of 1877 published a series of articles by Noble L. Prent is. These were afterward gathered in a volume entitled: A Kansan Abroad, what purports to be the second edition of which appeared in 1878, Topeka, Geo.W. Martin, sm. 8vo, pp. 240. One of the articles in this book, pp. 191-214, is thus described by its author, who seems to have been something of a wag: "The sketch, Pike of Pike’sPeak, was first delivered at Topeka, February 19th, 1877, under the patronage of the Kansas State Historical Society.Afterward, in the cheerful month of March, the author went around the country with his production in the form of a’lecture.’ It was not as funny as was expected, and, as a lecture, was not an overwhelming success. It now appears for the first time in print; and may it find more readers than it ever did hearers." In this wish I concur with pleasure; for Mr. Prent is evidently had read his Pike with interested attention, and his essay is one of the best short biographies of our hero that I have seen. I have occasion to cite it twice in the present memoir.

In his Explorers and Travellers, forming a volume of the Men of Achievement series, New York, Charles Scribner’sSons, 1893, Art. VI., pp. 163-193, General A. W. Greely,Chief Signal Officer, U. S. A., who himself illuminates achievement in exploration, has given an appreciative sketch of Pike’s career, in the main correct, though inaccurate in certain particulars. If I here specify two of these, it is in no spirit of detraction, but with the good feeling that General Greely reciprocated when I called his attention to them. It is said, p. 173, that "Pike visited Red Lake and passed to the north, which carried him to the drainage-basin of the Red River"; but Pike was never out of the Mississippian water shed on that voyage, his furthest point being Cass lake. This was formerly known as Red Cedar lake, whence perhaps General Greely’s misapprehension.Again, it is said, p. 183, that Pike "doubtless crossed into Middle Park [in Colorado] and saw the head-watersof the Colorado"; but Pike went directly fromSouth Park back into the valley of the Arkansaw, and never viewed a Pacific watershed. The general’s summary, p. 175, of Pike’s results on the Mississippi is judicious — a conservative estimate, colored with a generosity which none would wish to have been withheld:

Pike had more than carried out his orders to explore the sources of the great river, and did something more than give to the world the first definite and detailed information as to the upper river and its tributaries. He discovered the extent and importance of the British trade in that country, brought the foreign traders under the license and customs regulations of the United States, and broke up for all time their politicalinfluence over the Indians. He did much to restrain the unlawful sale of liquor to Indians by domestic traders, and not only inspired the Indians with respect for Americans, but also induced them to at least a temporary peace between themselves. He replaced a foreign flag by the ensign of his own country, and for the first time brought into this great territory the semblance of national authority and government.

Hon. Alva Adams of Pueblo, Col., delivered an address before the students and faculty of Colorado College, Colorado Springs, July 12th, 1894, which was published under the title: The Louisiana Purchase and its first Explorer,Zebulon Montgomery Pike, 8vo, pp. 23. This is a spirit edoration, befitting the occasion and inspiring to read. It is true that Pike’s book appeared in 1810, thus anticipating by four years the publication of Lewis and Clark; but can Governor Adams have forgotten who first explored the Louisiana Purchase, and returned from their expedition to the Pacific at noon of Sept. 23d, 1806 — At that date Pike was at the Pawnee village on the Republican river; and on the 4th of October he had the news of Lewis and Clark’s return to St. Louis. His western expedition had been in progress only since July 15th, 1806. If Governor Adams had Pike’s Mississippi voyage in mind, that does not alter the case. Lewis and Clark started up the Missouri May 24th, 1804; and when Pike began to navigate the Mississippi, Aug. 9th, 1805, Lewis and Clark were on Jefferson river, in Montana. Furthermore, Pike was preceded in exploring Louisiana, from Missourian waters to those of the Rio Grande, by James Pursley, who had himself been preceded by Jean Baptiste Lalande, as we are duly informed by Pike himself; and it is probable that French traders reached Santa Fé by the same way half a century before Pike.

The Annals of Iowa, 3d series, Vol. I. No. 7, Oct.,1894, pp. 531-36, contains an article entitled: Pike’s Explorations.This is anonymous, but was written by my much esteemed friend, Hon. Charles Aldrich, editor of the Annals and curator of the Iowa State Historical Department atDes Moines. The article is clear and concise; and it traces Pike’s several journeys with absolute accuracy.


We return from this bibliographical excursus to resume the thread of Pike’s biography — would that there had been many more years to chronicle in the gallant and patriotic, but all too brief, life of the young soldier! No longer lieutenant, but captain, since Aug. 12th, 1806, Pike was delivered out of the hands of "our friends the enemy" on the Sabine river, to which he had been escorted by his Spanish captors,June 29th, 1807; and arrived at Natchitoches about 4 p. m.,July 1st. The following letter was received at the War Department Sept. 29th, 1807; it is not included in the Appendix to Pt. 3 of the book, and has probably never been published. I print verbatim from a copy of the original now on file in the office of the secretary of war:

Natchitoches 15 July. 1807.

Sir

I arrived here a few days since with part of my command only, the ballance being yet in New Spain, but expect them daily; as the Capt. General assured me they should follow me in a short period; he detaining them I presume, to put them through an examination, when he conceived they would be more easily intimidated into some equivocal expressions; which might palliate the unjustifyable conduct of the Spanish Government with respect to the expidition which I had the honor to command.

Whatever may be the sentiments of the Executive of the United Statesas to the conduct of the Spaniards to myself and command, I am bound to submit. Yet I am conscious that our Honor and Dignity, as a nation will not permit us to tranquilly view, the violation of our Territories; infringements of Treaties; Hostile communications to our Savages; and oppression of our Citizens; in various Instances: all of which I can make manifest.

The unreasionable Ideas of the Vice Roy, & His Excelly the Capt. Genl. (the immediate representatives of his Catholic Majesty on our Spanish Frontiers) as it respects the line of Demarkation, is such that in my humble oppinion almost precludes the possibility of a thought that they can ever be amicably adjusted.

On that subject I flatter myself I have acquired some important and interesting information.

Although the Capt. Genl. seized on (what he conceived all) my papers, I yet possess by a little strategem, the whole of my Journals; courses; and distances; and many other Geographical; Historical; and Philosophical notes; which I presume will be worthy of particular notice.

I conceive by a fortuitous event, that information has been acquired of the Spanish Kingdom of New Spain, which a foreigner never yet possessed; and which in case of a rupture between the United States, and that Govt, will be of the highest importance: but should peace still continue to bless those happy climes, will afford pleaseing subjects of contemplation, for the statesmen, the philosopher; and the Soldier.

I received from Genl. Wilkinson, some Conditional Orders on my Arrival at the place [this place — Natchitoches]; to which I have replied; but as the destination of that Gentleman, was uncertain, I thought it my duty to make a short report to you: I shall remain here waiting for my men a short time longer (as I expect some important information by their hands) when I shall march by the way of Kentucky, for the City of Washington. My papers being in such a mutilated and deranged state it will require some time to arrange them & (to which object every moment shall be devoted) like wise at Washington: I can obtain some necessary assistance as it would take one person a great length of time to make fair copies, and draughts of the plans, Journals&c &c of a tour of upwards of 4000 Miles —

The Surveys of Capns Lewis & Clark; mine of the Mississippi; Osage; upper Arkensaw; L’Platte; and Kans rivers; with Lieut Wilkinson’s, &Mr. Freemans, of the lower parts, of the Red, and Arkensaw rivers; together with the notes I intend taking on my route from hence up the Mississippi; will I presume form a mass of matter; which will leave butthree, more objects, to be desired in forming a complete chart of Louisiana.

I am Sir with High Consideration

Your obl. Sert.
[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Capt.

The Honl.
Henry Dear borne
Sect. W. Dept.

While at Natchitoches, Captain Pike made it one of his first concerns to move in the matter of Captain Nolan’s men, then prisoners in Mexico: see beyond, pp. 609, 657,660, 666, 767, 811. The case is little known, and has not proved an easy one to recover. But through the kind attentions of the eminent historian, Reuben T. Durrett,LL. D., president of the Filson Club of Louisville, Ky.,I am put in possession of an article which appeared in the Natchez Herald of Aug. 18th, 1807, setting forth the factsin full. This I have the pleasure of presenting, literally according to the type-written copy which Dr. Durrett transmits,Apr. 12th, 1895:

Nachitoches, July 22, 1807.

Dear Sir — Inclosed you have a statement of the situation of the companions of the deceased Philip Nolan, and a short account of the ineffectual application I made, to rescue them from the eternal slavery, which it is to be feared, is destined for them, unless our government should be pleased to interfere in their behalf. Certainly the court of Spain would be too generous to refuse liberty to a few debilitated and half-lost wretches, who have at least expiated their crime, (if any)tenfold.

As I promised on my arrival in the United States, to give their friends an account of their situation, I could conceive no more certain and expeditious a method than through the medium of your Herald, and therefore wish you to give this communication publicity; and hope the Editors of the Gazettes of the states in which the friends of those unfortunate young men may belong, will republish it, that their connections may receive the melancholy assurances of some being in existence, and that others are beyond the power of tyranny and oppression.

I am, &c.,
[Signed] Z. M. Pike.

In a late involuntary tour which I made through part of his Catholic majesty’s dominions of New Spain, whilst at St. Affe [Santa Fé], the capitol of N. Mexico and Chihuahua, I met with a number of the poor unfortunate companions of the deceased Nolan. One of whom gave me the following cursory statement of their treatment, &c. since their being taken, and on their joint application, I addressed a letter to his excellency Nemeio [sic] Salcedo, in their favor, of which an extract is subjoined, with the verbal reply of the general.

"We crossed the Mississippi on the 1st day of November, 1800, at the Walnut hills [Nogales], and in January following arrived at the river Brassus [Brazos], in the provinces of Texus, and proceeded to build pens[for the capture of mustangs]. In March, 1801, we began to run wild horses, and having caught several hundreds of them we selected the handsomest and let the ballance go. On the 22 of March, we were attacked at break of day, by sixty regular troops, and two hundred and forty militia and Indians, with one field piece. Our commander, (Nolan)being killed, we capitulated in the evening, on the assurance that Nolanwas killed, who only was to blame, we should be conducted to Naggadoches[Nacogdoches], from whence there was no doubt, we would have permission to return to our country, as soon as the circumstances were stated to the governor of St. Antonio. We remained there under promises and daily expectations of being released until July, when we were all put in heavy irons.

"In August we were marched, in irons, to St. Antonio [Texas]; and in December through the province of Coqquella [Coahuila] and [New]Biscay, into the vice-royalty of Mexico, to the city of St. Louis Potosi, where we remained fourteen months, ironed, and in close confinement. In February, 1803, we were dispatched to Chihuahua, where after sometime, our irons were struck off. From which to the present time, we have experienced various treatment, sometimes enjoying the liberty of the town, sometimes the barracks, and for three months in irons and close confinement.

"David Fero, from near Albany, state of New York, has been alternately in irons, the guard-house, limits of the fort or procedie [presidio] — isnow confined to the limits of a fort called Cayome [sic], eight leagues distant from Chihuahua — in bad health. [See beyond, pp. 660,665, 811.]

"Simon M’Coy, of the Oppelousas, or Natchez, a carpenter by profession, has the liberty of the town of Chihuahua — in good health.

"Joseph Reed, state of Kentucky, in the province of Biscay, but in what part and how situated unknown.

"Solomon Cooley [Colly of pp. 609, 613, beyond], of the state of Connecticut, a taylor by profession, carries on his business in the town of St. Affee, which is his limits.

"William Danton, of Natchez, residence and situation unknown.

"Charles King, of Natchez, works at the carpenter’s trade, is confined by night to the quartel at Chihuahua — in good health.

"Ephriam Blackburn, of Natchez, is in some of the procedios of the province of Biscay — situation unknown.

"Joel Pears, of North Carolina, deceased at Chihuahua.

"John Waters, of Winchester, Virginia, a hatter, and carries on his business at Chihuahua, has embraced the Roman Catholic faith, after betraying a well concerted plan of his companions to effect their escape, and in which it is supposed they would have succeeded: his treachery caused them a close confinement in irons, and in a loathsome prison for three months — he is hated and despised, not only by his own countrymen but by every honest Spaniard in the place.

"Ellis Bean, of Granger county, state of Tennessee, a hatter, formerly carried on his business in the city of Chihuahua, but being detected inan intrigue with the daughter of an officer, and refusing to marry her,was in close confinement at St. Jeronime [San Jeronimo], a few leagues distant, in good health.

"Thomas House, of Jefferson county, Tennessee, blacksmith, confined to the quartel at night, but at that time was at the hospital, in a very bad state of health.

"Stephen Richards, of Natchez, has in listed in the Spanish service, was lately at Baton Rouge with his father, in the quality of a citizen — belongs to the troops at Nagadoches."

[Here follows the above-mentioned letter from Pike to his Excellency,General Salcedo, given beyond, pp. 810-812.]

This letter I presented personally, & after the general had learned its contents, through an interpreter, he observed in reply That having found those men, on his arrival from Europe, to take the command of the internal provinces of New Spain, in the dungeons of St. Louis Potosi, he had demanded them of the Vice-Roy, and brought them to Chihuahua, where their irons were struck off, and every indulgence allowed them which his responsibility would admit — that he had felt a particular desire to serve Fero, but whose haughtiness of soul would not permit him to be under any obligation to the government, further than his allowance of twenty-five cents per day. That he had reported their situation to the King, and consequently must await the orders of his majesty; that with respect to the letters, they had always been permitted to correspond through him, with their friends — but that I might use my own pleasure as to taking letters, but he thought the peculiar delicacy of my own situation, should prevent me from taking any written communication out of the country.

Thus ended the conference, and thus stands the situation of those unfortunate men at present. But as I knew some part of the general’s information to be incorrect, and especially as it related to the freedom of communication with their friends, I felt no such peculiar delicacy as to prevent my bringing out letters — but brought every one intrusted to my care.

[Signed] Z. M. Pike.

The records I have examined do not show Captain Pike’s movements for the next few months. But imagination easily forges the missing links of the return of an intrepid and successful explorer who had been a captive in foreign lands, given up by his friends as lost to them forever — a loved husband, whom domus et placens uxor awaited — ahero, whose story remained to be told to a public eager to hear of El Dorado. He was in Washington soon — most likely before the end of the year, certainly in Jan., 1808 — andalready in hot water. For he took a header into the political caldron, which perpetually boils there, but had been superheated for him in consequence of his supposed confidential relations with his military commander-in-chief.[M-13]His name came before Congress in a way which ruffled his plumes, and extorted the following mettlesome effusion:

Washington 22 Feb y 08.

Sir

The Honorable John Rowan of the House of representatives from Kentucky; has this day made some observations before that Honarable body from which a tacit inference might be drawn that my late Tour to the Westward was founded on Views intirely unknown to the Government; and connected with the nefarious plans of Aaron Burr and his associates. Had those insinuations arisen in any other quarter I should have concieved that my early choice of the military life, the many ardious and confidential duties I have performed, with the perfect knowledge which the Goverment must have of my military and political Character; would have been a sufficient justification for me to have passed over them in silence: but coming from so respectable a source. I feel it a duty to myself; my family; and my profession; to request of you a testimonial which may shut the mouth of Calumny — and strike dumb the voice of slander. I have therefore to request of you Sir! to Honor me with a communication which may be calculated to present to the Speaker of the House of representatives; or a Committee of their Body, who have been appointed to inquire whether any, or what, extra Compensationshould be made me & my Companions; for our late Voyages of Discovery, and exploration; and that I may have permission to give publicity to this letter which I have the Honor to address you, and your answer.

I am Sir with High Consideration

Your obt. Sert.
[Signed] Z. M. Pike Capt1st.
UStates Regt. Infy

The Hon.
Henry Dearborne
Sec. War. Dept.

On the same sheet of paper which has this letter, General Dearborn drafted a reply, with many interlineations and erasures, to be copied in a fair clerk’s hand and signed by himself. In its final form, as received by Captain Pike, it was published, with other papers relating to Congressional action, as a part of Document No. 6 of the App. to Pt. 3 of the orig. ed. of this work: see p. 844. Its first form is as follows:

Feb: 24. 1808, War Dept.

Sir. In answer to your letter of the 22d Inst. I with pleasure observe that alth’o the two exploring expeditions you have performed were not previously ordered by the President of the U. S. there were frequent communications on the subject of each, between Genl. Wilkinson &this Department, of which the President of the U. S. was aquainted from time to time, and it will be no more than what justice requires to say, that your conduct in each of those expeditions met the approbation of the President; and that the information you obtained and communicated to the Executive in relation to the sources of the Mississippi & the natives in that quarter and the country generally as well on the uper Mississippi as that between the Arkansas & the Missouri, and on the borders of the latter extensive river to its source, and the adjacent countries, has been considered as highly interesting in a political, geographical & historical view. And you may rest assured that your services are held in high estimation by the President of the U. S.; and if opinion of my own can afford you any satisfaction I can very frankly declare that I consider the public very much indebted to you for the enterprising persevering and judicious manner in which you have performed them.

[No signature.]

To the above Pike made reply at once:

Washington City 26 Feby 08

Sir!

Suffer me to offer through you, to the president of the United States the effusions of a Heart impress’d with Gratitude for the very honarable testimonial of his approbation received by the Medium of Your Communication of the 24 Inst.

The Confidence of the Executive, and the respect of our fellow Citizens, must be the grand desiderata of every man of Honor, who wears a sword in the republican Armies of the United States; to acquire which has been the undeviateing pursuit of the earliest part of my life, &shall mark the colour of my future actions.

Suffer me to add Sir! that I feel myself deeply impressed by the Sentiments of personal respect and consideration with which you was pleased to Honor me — and shall always be proud to be considered as one who holds for your person and character Sentiments of the Sincerest Respect& Esteem

I am Sir
Your ob Sert
[Signed] Z. M. Pike Capt

The Honl.
Hen. Dearborne
Sec War Dept.

Meanwhile Captain Pike was panting for promotion — dear to every soldiers heart, and in his case well deserved.His majority was in sight but not in hand. There appears to have been a technical obstacle in his way. We often smile at the witticism expressed in the phrase: "the United States and New Jersey." Like most such things, it is not new. Being a Jerseyman, Captain Pike was required to establish the fact that he was not an alien to the United States — not for that reason, perhaps — still he was required to produce certain evidence of citizenship, as the following curious correspondence shows:

New-Jersey. Trenton 23d March 1808.

It appears by the records of this State, that Capt. John Pike, in the Year 1666, was one of the Original purchasers of & Settlers in Woodbridge — a magistrate & member of Council under the Proprietory government. — I have been well acquainted with Major Zebulon Pike, from my Childhood and with Capt. John Brown (Lieutent. of Cavalry in the revolutionary War) also a Native of Woodbridge — and whose daughter Capt. ZM. Pike married; so that Capt Pike has good reason to claim New-Jersey, not only as his Native State, but as the residence of his family for near a Century & a half.

[Signed] Joseph Bloomfield

The above certificate of Governor Bloomfield was inclosed by Pike to the War Department with the following letter:

Washington City 4 Apl 1808

Sir!

Having received the enclosed document from Govr. Bloomfield on the 27th Ulto. — who has particularly interested himself in my promotion in the profession my inclination has induced me to persue; I should not have conceived it necessary to have laid it before you had I not understood that you expressed a doubt as to the place of my nativity; and whether, the state of Jersey, was that of which I had a right to claim a Citizenship. I had not conceived that it would be requisite for a native of America who had served his country in Arms for Years (And his forefathers before him) to establish the Locality of his birth right but the prevoy prevoyance of my respected friend His Excells Govr. Bloomfield has laid it in my power to satisfy Genl. Dear borne on that Subject — Ihope I shall be pardoned for thus intrudeing myself on the time of the Secy of War, and beg leave to offer assurances of High respect& Esteem — —

[Signed] Z. M. Pike

The Honl.
Henry Dearborne.
Secy War Dept.

Having thus proven that he was a citizen of New Jersey and of the United States, the captain could feel that the coveted majority was his. His commission as major of the 6th Infantry, of date May 3d, 1808, was acknowledged by him in the following letter, which I have also chosen as the one to be reproduced in facsimile for the present work:

Letter

Washington 5 May. 1808

Sir

I have the Honor to acknowledge the receipt of yours, notifying me of my appointment to a Majority in the 6th Regt. of Infantry in the Service of the United States. You will please Sir! to receive this as my acceptance of the same, and believe me to be

With High Consideration
Your Obt. Sert.
[Signed] Z. M. Pike

The Honl.
Henry Dearborne
Sec. War Dep.

Among other things which had engaged Major Pike’s attention was of course his book — that story of his adventures which he had fondly dreamed would immortalize his name, and respecting which his dream was realized.He had already made such progress in his literary work that he entered into official correspondence with theSecretary of War on that subject. For instance:

Washington, 14th, April 1808.

Sir: —

[A two-page letter concluding thus:]

I shall in a day or two address an unofficial letter to the President, requesting the favour of his advice, on the Subject of the publication of my Voyages, on which, he having read them, in Manuscript, will be aCompetent Judge — In this I shall speak as having the permission of your Department for the publication. —

I am Sir,
with great Consideration,
Your obt. servt.
[Signed] Z. M. Pike Captain.

The inside history of books which the world will not let die is always interesting. Here is a letter which speaks for itself:

Philadelphia 27 May. 1808.

Dr. Sir!

I have entered into an agreement with the firm of Conrad, Lucas &Co of this place to print and publish my Tours, for which I allow them 20 pr. Cent on all the sales, and pay besides the expences of printing &c. — This,with bad debts and other Casualties will leave to myself but an extreme small profit but as a soldiers views are more Generally directed to fame than interest I hope that one object will at least be accomplished. — The Work will not exceed four dollars pr. Copy but the exact price we cannot yet ascertain but hope Genl. Dearborne will give it all the patronage which he may deem it entitled to; and Signify to Messrs.Conrad and Lucas the number of Copies you will take on ac of your Department.I have taken the Liberty of enclosing under cover to you a letter addressed to Nau [the draughtsman] which the Secy can read, and if he does not wish to retain that man, in the Service of the Goverment at the present time he will be good enough to have the letter presented to him, and should the Goverment wish his services in the Autumn or after he has done my business he can return to Washington: But if he cannot be spared by the Departt. the letter can be destroyed look out for another person —

I beg leave to remind the Secy of War of the applications which have been made in favour of my friend Docr. Robinson — and hope he may yet be brought in for a Company Vice some one who did not accept.

Will Genl. Dearborne accept of my sincere acknowledgements for the many favours he has conferred on me and believe me to be with sincere respect and Esteem.

His obt Sert
[Signed] Z M Pike

The War Department proved to be a liberal subscriber; for General Dearborn indorsed the above in his own handwriting,"We will take 50 copies."

Matters thus being satisfactorily arranged for the publicationof his book, Major Pike seems to have returned at once, or very soon, to military duty in his new rank — unles she went to see his wife on leave of absence. We find himat Belle Fontaine in August of this year, as evidenced by a letter I will transcribe in part, epitomizing the rest:

Camp Belle Fontain
18 Augt. 1808.

Sir!

Col. Hunt[M-14] deceased last night at half past 12 O. C. after an illness of some weeks — He has left a distressed widow and nine children unprovided for, and unprotected. [The letter recommends military appointments for Col. Hunt’s two sons, George and Thomas; states that the command of the district has devolved on Capt. James House of the artillery; that Capt. Clemson’s company of the 1st Infantry had marched 10 days before for Fire Prairie, 25 miles up the Missouri, and Capt. Pinckney’s company was to march in about 10 days for the DesMoines r., which would leave only one company of artillery at Belle Fontaine; wishes to know when he shall have definite orders to join his battalion in New Jersey; expects to be at Pittsburgh next October; and continues:] which is my anxious wish as from appearances we shall again have to meet the European Invaders of our country and if I know myself, I feel anxious to have the honor of being amongst the first to rencounter their boasted phalanx’s and to evence to them that the sons are able to sustain the Independence handed down to us by our Fathers

[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Majr.
6th Regt Inf

Before the year closed Major Pike had come East, and found his hands full, no doubt, in presenting to Congress the claims of himself and his men to the generous consideration of that body, in the little matter of an appropriation for their benefit. Those who have ever had occasion to cool their heels in the halls of greatness, till the mercury of their hopes congealed in the bulbs of their thoroughlyrefrigerated boots, will best appreciate Pike’s plight. The novelist’s realism of little Miss Flite in Chancery is out-realized in the Bleak House on Capitol Hill, which William McGarrahan haunted for a lifetime, and from which his injured ghost may not yet be freed. The following letter was written when Pike had not lost hope:

Capitol Hill, 2 Decemr. 08.

Sir

I am informed by Mr. Montgomery that some members of the committee (on the resolutions moved in favour of my late exploreing parties) wish to have our members officially notified; and the time we were employed in each Expedition, which information you requested from General Wilkinson — In closed you have a return of the party on each tour and the commencement & expiration, but as all the intervening time between my return from the source of the Mississippi to our departure to the West we were employed in prepareing for the second tour; I submit to your Judgment whether the whole should not be engrossed — Also there being a number of men still in new Spain the time will necessarily be extended to them. [This matter makes chap. vi., pp. 840-855,beyond.]

The Committee meet to-morrow morning will Genl. Dear borne have the goodness to furnish them with the necessary information by that time — I would have waited on you personally but am this day to set on General Court Martial which convenes at 9 OC. A. M.

I am Sir with High Respect
& Esteem your ob. sert
[Signed] Z M Pike Majr.
6 Regt Infy

The Honl.
Henry Dearborne
Sec W. Dept.

Nothing came of this move. Pike was less fortunate than Lewis and Clark. The difference did not all depend upon merit; simply, he had no political "pull." His expeditions originated with General Wilkinson; they were military movements with which the President had nothing to do. Jealousy is the most nearly universal of human weaknesses, in high as well as low places; besides which, Thomas Jefferson had his own opinion of James Wilkinson. WhateverMajor Pike may have thought of it, he certainly lost little time in dancing attendance on Congress; he was not built for a lobbyist. In Dec., 1808, we find him on military duty at Fort McHenry, Md., as appears from various official letters of his before me, but which need not be transcribed, as they represent merely the routine correspondence of an army officer. At some period in 1809 he was transferred to the West; and he was on duty as military agent in New Orleans from Sept. 13th, 1809, to Mar. 10th, 1810, or later, by virtue of the following order:

Camp Terre au B — uf,
Sept. 13th. 1809 —

Sir

The Situation of the public service and the impossibility of finding a suitable Character in private life to undertake the temporary duties of Military Agent, Obliges me to impose that Office on you.... [instructions follow.]

[Signed] J. Wilkinson
Majr. Z. M. Pike

During his tour of duty in New Orleans Major Pike became lieutenant-colonel of the 4th Infantry Dec. 31st, 1809. One of Lieutenant-Colonel Pike’s letters shows that he did not forget "Baroney," his quondam companion in arms on the Arkansaw:

New Orleans
March 4th. 1810

Sir

Ensign Vasquez of the 2d Infantry who was late Interpreter on the tour of Discovery to the source of the Arkansaw &c presented himself tome at this place. After being three years in the United States service without receiving any settlement I made a statement of his accounts and gave him an advance in Cash and a draft for the balance, in order that if the form of settlement did not meet your approbation they might be corrected. He has been absent going on four years, and begs permission to return to St Louis to see his Aged parents, which I hope will be granted him by the Honl. Secretary of War. The French language is his proper one; but he speaks Spanish very well, and is beginning with the English, but very imperfectly as yet. Under those circumstances I should conceive his services would be most important on the SpanishFrontiers. As he is about to embark for the City of Washington, I shall furnish him with a duplicate of this letter, and remain Sir, with

the highest Respect & Esteem
Your Obdt. Servt.
Z. M. Pike

The Honl William Eustis
Secretary War Department

There is little to mark Lieutenant-Colonel Pike’s career in 1810-11, or until the breaking out of the war of 1812. From many letters I have seen by which he can be traced in these years, uneventful for him, I select one which show the workings of his mind at this time, as well as his readiness to ventilate the views which he entertained. Characters such as his have visions which they may freely express without carrying conviction to others. The following communication was received at the War Department from Mississippi Territory:

Cantonment, Washington June 10, 10

Sir

Although, it may be deemed unmilitary in me (a Subordinate in Command)to address myself immediately to the War Department yet the purport of this Communication being principally of a private nature, I presume it will not, be deemed a great deviation from propriety. — I entered the Army at the early age of fifteen, and have continued to pursue my profession with enthusiasm to the present time a period upwards of Sixteen years during which I have had every practical experience which the times offered of becoming a Soldier. — Together with a Careful perusal of numerous Millitary authors in the French & English languages. — But happily for my Country her Councils have been guided by Such Judicious Measures; That the opportunity which I have so long panted for, of Calling into Action, The Experience I possess, has never Occured. — Knowing that it must be the interest of the U.S to keep at peace with the world, and despairing of ever being Calld Into actual service I should some time since have resignd the sword and became a farmer, (The only proffession I can acquire) only for the unsettled state of our foreign affairs. — Fortune has at length placed me (Through the instrumentality of General Hampton) at the Head of the Compleatest body of Infantry in the US. — If this Regiment should be Consolidated and the Col. not join, I should be very happy to retain the Command and remain in this quarter. — If not I would hope to be ordered to join myRegiment in New England, a quarter of the Union I should be gratifyd.in spending some time in. — Should I remain here and be permitted to introduce the modern Discipline — into the Corps I would pledge my existance it would be equal to any in the U S. in one year. This is a subject of much diversity of Oppinion, as many gentlemen wish to Confineus to Stuben.[M-15] — The value of whose system no man appreciates more justly than myself. But the Battle of Jena but too fatally evinced to the Prusian Monarch that the mordern improvements in the Art of War had been such, as entirely to overturn the principles of manourvres of the Malboroughs — Eugenes and Fredericks. The Millitary Establishment of the United States can only be viewed as the nuclues of an Army in Case of War, from whence Could be drawn Staff Officers well versed in tactics and police — In the foregoing observations I mean to cast no reflections on my superior officers; — but Conceive at the same time the Ideas may not be deemed obtrusive On the Honl Secty of War. — Whilst makeing this unofficial Communication I think it my duty to intimate the situation in which the neighbouring province of Florida now stands. The Goverment is in a Compleat state of Lethargie. — The Citizens are forrming committees and appear to be disposed to offer their allegiance to the US. when if it should be refused, they will Make it a tender to Great Britain this would have been done some time since had they not feared the Isle of Cuba. — That Cuba is competant to keep them in Subjection by force is extremely doubtful; But what line of Conduct the U. S will persue on the Occasion is an important question. — our views should only be turned to the effect our interferance would have abroad for we haved is posible force in this territory & Orleans when joined to the Malcontents amply sufficient to secure possession of the province; But with respect to the effect this would have on Mexico is seriously to be taken into consideration Mexico including all the possessions of Spain Northof Terra Firma [Tierra Firme], must constitute ere long a great and independant power of at least seven millions of souls, with more of the precious metals than any other nation in the world will it not be an object of the first Magnitude for the U S to secure the trade, friendship and alliance of this people. They never will become a maritime or manufactoring nation they are at present pastorial and on trial will prove Warlike. I hesitate not to say they can pour forth thousands of Calvary surpass’d by none in the World. To this power we might become the Carryers and Manifactories, for which no Nation Could view with us; which would be sources of immense Wealth. — And an Augmentation of our power. — To this very important object I humby conceive a too early attention cannot be paid — On this subject I have probaly intruded my opinion on Mr. Eustis, but I could not forbear giveing those intimations which I conceived might be beneficial to my Country. — I had a brother in the Military Academy from whom I have not heard for some time should he merit the favour of his Country; — or if his Fathers Thirty Years service or my own claim some small indulgence for him, I hope he may be appointed an Ensign of Infantry and sufferd to join the Regiment to which I may be attached; the latter part of this request is not made from a desire that I may have it in my power to shew him any favour; far from it, but that, I may have him near me to Restrain the Disposition which all youths evince for irregularities. And point out to him the paths of propriety and Honor, also that he may benefit [by] the few years he can appropriate to study by the use of a variety of Millitary Authors I have collected. — Such are my reasons for wishing my brother with me. I hope this may meet the approbation of the Honbe Secrty. — Andthis letter may be attributed to its true motives, and that the Honble Secty may beleive me as I am from Duty and inclination Sincerely devoted to my Country and his obedt

Hble Sert —
[Signed] Z M Pike

STOPPED HERE

The Honl.
Wm. Eustis
Secy War Dept

Lieutenant-Colonel Pike’s "despair of ever being called into service" was of short duration. He was soon to be called upon to lay down his life for his country on the battlefield. From April 3d, 1812, to July 3d of that year he had been deputy quartermaster-general. He was promoted to the colonelcy of the 15th Infantry July 6th, 1812. The war was upon us. Colonel Pike’s qualifications for the command of a regiment may be best estimated in the terms of his military biographer, General Whiting, who says, pp. 309-311:

Probably no officer in the army, at that time, was held in higher estimation. This was not because he had seen much actual service, for he had hardly been in the presence of the enemy before the day on which he fell. It was on the promise, rather than the fulfilment, that the public mind rested his character for boldness and enterprise; and his fitness to direct and control men had been determined, to an extent that warranted much confidence, by his expeditions in the north-west and the south-west. He had there given such proofs of those qualities, as established a reputation in advance. He had exhibited, moreover, an indefatigable activity in the drill of his regiment, requiring of all under his command an unwearied devotion to duty, and an exact and prompt to obedience to orders.

His regiment became an example of zeal, discipline, and aptitude in movements; his men had an unbounded belief in his capacity, and his officers looked up to him with unusual respect and affection. He inspired that confidence in all under his orders, which is almost a certain evidence that it is merited.

At the opening of the war of 1812, we were almost without any fixed guides in tactics and discipline. The standard of the latter part of the revolution, and of subsequent times, "Old Steuben," which had been approved by Washington, and had led to some of the best triumphs of the closing years of that glorious period, had become obsolete, even before any substitute was provided. Hence, when new regiments came into service by scores in 1812, nothing was prescribed for regulation or for drill. The old regiments had their forms and customs, which preserved in them the aspect of regulars. But even these presented no uniform example. Some adopted the "nineteen manuvres" of the English; others, the ninety-and-nine manuvres of the French; while a few adhered to old Dundas; and fewer still to older Steuben.

Nothing was laid down by the proper authority; therefore all manner of things were taken up without any authority at all. Amid this confusion, or wide latitude of choice, General Pike, though brought up in the old school, was often tempted, by his ambitious desire for improvement, to run into novelties. With a prescribed rule, he would have been the most steady and uncompromising observer of it. But, in such a competition for beneficial change, he most naturally believed himself as capable as others of changing for the better.

In this spirit of innovation, the 15th regiment underwent many changes, and exhibited, even in times when novelties and singularities were no rarities, perhaps the widest departure from common standards of any regiment in service. Adopting the French system of forming in three ranks, his third rank was armed in a manner peculiar to itself, having short guns, being the ordinary musket cut off some inches, and long pikes. It was said, by the wags of the day, that his own name suggested the manner, and the regiment was often called "Pike’s regiment of pikes."

These pikes presented a formidable appearance on drill and dress parade, when the men could display their tactics with the precision of automata. They were even retained in the assault of Fort York. But at the first engagement after the fall of General Pike, the men threw them away, together with the cut-off pieces, and picked up English muskets to fight with. The experiment of putting his regiment on snow-shoes which Pike tried doubtless remembering their service ability to himself and his company on the upper Mississippi in the winter of 1805-6 — does not seem to have proven any more lasting or decided a success.

Colonel Pike’s sword was stronger than his pen, as we know; but he could sharpen either weapon on occasion, as the following spirited repulse of a newspaper attack on his regiment will show:[M-16]

Camp near Plattsburg [N. Y.], Oct. 12th, 1812.

Sir:

However incompatible it may be with the character and profession of a soldier, to enter into the party politics of the day, yet when the honor of the government, the corps he commands, and his personal fame are wantonly attacked, and attempted to be sacrificed to satiate them alignant venom of party purposes, it becomes his duty as a man, a patriot, to come forward and boldly contradict the base calumniator. The following piece "from the Connecticut Herald" and republished in the New York Herald of October 3d, is not only calculated to bring disrepute on the government, but to hold up our army as a mob wanting in discipline as well as in patriotism. The piece alluded to is as follows, viz.:

"The multiplied proof of folly, or of madness, or some worse cause, that have driven the nation into a ruinous, offensive war, are accumulating with every day’s experience. Barely to enumerate the evidence would occupy columns. Two or three facts of recent occurrence, which have come to my knowledge, are in point and worthy of record. It is then a fact (for I state it on the best authority) that either the national treasury is so miserably empty, or the proper department so deficient induty, that the army under General Dearborn, which has so long been idling away their time near Albany, was not only unpaid, but unprovided with the common necessaries of a camp; and when, a few days since, a part of these troops were ordered to the frontiers, one whole regiment(Colonel Pike’s) absolutely refused, and deliberately stacked their arms, declaring they would not move until paid. In this refusal they were justified by their colonel, and an old soldier, who admitted they ought not to march unless the government would first pay the arrears due them. It fortunately happened that Mr. Secretary Gallatin was then at Albany, and on learning the state of affairs at the encampment, he borrowed $20,000 from one of the banks on his private credit, by which means the troops were paid, and cheerfully followed their commander."

In contradiction to this statement it will be sufficient to give the following facts:

[Firstly] — That the regimental paymaster had in his hands funds to pay the whole regiment up to the 31st. And [that] within three days of the period when the troops moved, three companies were paid previous to the march and the balance so soon as the troops halted a sufficient time to give the officers an opportunity to adjust the rolls and prepare the accounts of the recruits.

Secondly — That those funds were received by the regimental paymaster from the district paymaster, Mr. Eakins, who was then at Albany, and not from Mr. Gallatin whom, it is believed, did not arrive till after the regiment moved from Greenbush.

These facts can be corroborated by every officer of the 15th Infantry, who one and all deem the paragraph published in the Herald a base calumny, a direct attack on their honor as soldiers, and declare that the author, whoever he may be, has asserted gross untruths. As for myself, I have had the honor to serve in the army from the rank of volunteer to the station I now hold, during the Administration of Gen. Washington, Mr. Adams, Mr. Jefferson, and Mr. Madison, and can affirm that I have known some troops under the three first to have been upward of a year without a payment, and under the latter for eight months. This was owing to the dispersed state of our troops on the western frontiers. But never did I hear of a corps shewing a disposition to refuse to do their duty, because they had not received their pay; nor do I believe the American army has been disgraced by an instance of the kind since the Revolutionary War. But ask any man of consideration, what time it requires to organize an army, or a corps of new ((recruits — if)), owing to the want of a knowledge of the officers to forms of returns, accounts, etc., it will not be some time before a new corps can be as well equipped, or appear as much like soldiers, as an old one — Every soldier will reply that it will require two years at least to teach both officers and men to reap the same benefit from the same supplies as old soldiers. And although at this time the 15th regiment has been as regularly supplied as any other corps with clothing, pay, arms, and accoutrements, even to watch coats to protect the sentinel against the winter storms, yet were there an old regiment laying by their side, who had received the same supplies, they would most indubitably be better equipped and make themselves more comfortable, having the saving of two or more years’ supplies on hand. But whether ill or well supplied, the soldiers and officers have too just a sense of the duty they owe their country and their own honor, ever to refuse to march against the enemy. And the colonel begs leave to assure the author of the above paragraph, that he hopes hewill forbear any future attempt to injure his reputation by praising an action which, if true, must have forever tarnished the small claim he now has to a military character.

[Signed] Z. M. Pike,
Colonel 15th U. S. Infantry.

Colonel Pike seldom had occasion to make proclamations of a politico-military character. But one such which he issued while he was in command of a district may be he recited. It is not dated, in the printed form before me, but was no doubt given out in Jan., 1813, as it appears in Niles’ Register for the week ending Jan. 30th, III. No. 22,p. 344:

To all whom it may concern. The state of hostility which exists between try and the adjacent province of Canada should be regulated on the principles which govern belligerent nations. I have had it in charge from the commanding general, Chandler [John Chandler, of New Hampshire, d. 1841]that no person should be permitted to pass in or out of Canada without his permission, or, in his absence, the permission of the commandant of the district of Champlain. This order has been communicated to the commanding officer on the lines, and will be strenuously enforced.

Some members of the community have been found so void of all sense of honor, love of country, or any other principle which has governed the virtuous of all nations and ages, as to hold correspondence with and give intelligence to our enemies. It therefore becomes my duty to put the laws in full force. The two following sections of the rules and articles of war, which are equally binding on the citizen and the soldier, are published for the information of the public, that no one may plead ignorance, as from this time hence forward they shall be enforced with the greatest severity.

"Art. 56. Whosoever shall relieve the enemy with money, victuals, or ammunition, or shall knowingly harbor or protect an enemy shall sufferdeath, or such other punishment as shall be ordered by the sentence of a court-martial.

"Art. 57. Whosoever shall be convicted of holding correspondence with, or giving intelligence to, the enemy, either directly or indirectly, shall suffer death , or such other punishment as shall be ordered by the sentence of a court-martial."

[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Col. 15th Regt. Inf.
Commanding West Lake Champlain.

During the winter of 1812-13, when the 15th regiment was stationed on the northern frontier, in view of the operations to be undertaken against the posts of the enemy on the lakes, great confidence in this well-disciplined and zealous body of troops was felt by General Henry Dearborn, formerly secretary of war, and then the senior major-general of the army, in immediate command. As we have just seen, General Pike was in charge of a military district on Lake Champlain; his command was then of about 2,500 men. Various desultory demonstrations against the enemy had proved futile, in some cases fatuous and disgraceful. The War Department determined upon a more consistent and apparently feasible plan of concerted operations, which had in view the reduction of all the British posts on the St. Lawrence River and Lake Ontario. The capture of Kingston (site of old Fort Frontenac) was a measure of first importance. The garrison was supposed to be small, and lulled in a sense of security, owing to the rigors of the season and the numerical insignificance of our troops at Sackett’s Harbor; nor was Kingston likely to be re-enforced from below, as the British forces were menaced on the Lower St. Lawrence by Pike’s troops on Lake Champlain. It was proposed to transport these in sleighs to the foot of Lake Ontario with such promptitude that the movement could not be counteracted. General Dearborn also proposed to concentrate other forces at Sackett’s Harbor, to which place his headquarters at Albany were to be moved at once. This was in Feb., 1813. But while these measures were pending, Sir George Prevost, Governor-General of the Canadas, prorogued the Parliament then in session, and moved to Kingston with re-enforcements for that place. According toGeneral Dearborn’s dispatches of Mar. 3d from Sackett’s Harbor, this demonstration seemed so alarming that operations against Kingston were suspended in favor of others which had regard to the safety of Sackett’s Harbor; though it appears in General Armstrong’s History of the War that Sir George Prevost had executed a clever ruse with few troops, and "countervailed his antagonist only by dexterous and well-timed reports," Whiting’s Pike, p. 290 seq.

The proposed attack on Kingston over the ice having been abandoned, the Secretary of War’s alternative plan of reducing in succession the several posts on and about Lake Ontario engaged General Dearborn’s attention. The Secretary indicated the order in which the successive attacks were to be made, viz.: Kingston and York on Lake Ontario; George and Erie on the Niagara river. But this sequence was not strictly regarded by General Dearborn, who determined to attack Kingston last instead of first; considering the rotation of the assaults to be of minor consequence, in view of the main features of a campaign which had for its object the reduction of all the posts named in the order of the Secretary. The general commanding, on consultation with Commodore Isaac Chauncey, concluded to make York the initial point of attack; George to come next, and then Kingston.

The prospect held out by this plan of the campaign was certainly very promising. It had all such probabilities in its favor as could be commanded by those who control only one side of the current of events. The force that could and would be brought to bear on each point of attack was ample, and left as little to hazard as prudence would suggest. The plan was founded on the best principles of strategy, and highly creditable to the general ship which dictated it. Had it been carried out with the spirit and perseverance with which it was commenced, there was every reasonable prospect of a successful issue. The causes of its failure were obvious: delays, without proper objects, after the capture of Fort George; and a change of command, wholly unnecessary and inexpedient, which led to the waste of nearly an entire season of inactivity(Whiting, p. 297).

As noted by this military critic and historian, General Dearborn was relieved from command early in July, 1813, his successor being enjoined to rest on his arms, except in the event of certain improbable contingencies which never arose, until the arrival of General Wilkinson, who did not reach Fort George until September, or resume operations until Oct. 1st; so that "nearly three months were utterly wasted by a body of 4,000 troops."

But I have digressed from the attack on Fort York, with which alone are we here concerned.

In the latter part of April, 1813, the navigation of Lake Ontario was open, and no molestation was apprehended, asit was known that Sir James Yeo’s fleet was not operative. Agreeably with the plan of the campaign above briefly noted, therefore, General Dearborn embarked on board Commodore Chauncey’s fleet, with about 1,700 troops, under the immediate command of Brigadier-General Pike, Apr. 25th.On the morning of the 27th the fleet reached York harbor,where it was intended to debark for the assault on Fort York. This military post defended the place which had been known as Toronto till 1793, and was then called York till 1834, when it resumed its aboriginal name.

The true signification of the Iroquois word which has settled in the form Toronto, after long fluctuation of all its vowels, is uncertain, or at any rate, is still questioned. It is now most frequently translated "trees in the water," or by some equivalent phrase, with reference to the formerly wooded, long, low spit of land which still encompasses the harbor of Ontario’s metropolis. Irrespective of its etymology, the various connotations of Toronto in successive historical periods are to be carefully discriminated. If we turn to old maps, we see that the present Georgian bay of Lake Huron was Toronto bay; the present Lake Simcoe was Toronto lake; present Severn river and the Humber were each of them Toronto river. In the seventeenth century, Toronto was the official designation of a region between Lake Simcoe and the Georgian bay, the country of the Huron's, on the large peninsula which intervenes between Lake Huron and Lake Ontario. The comparatively narrow neck of this peninsula offered, by means of Humber river and certain portages, a convenient way to pass between these two great lakes. It was, in fact, an Indian thoroughfare. The mouth of the Humber consequently became an Indian rendezvous, and the name of the whole region thus became best known in connection with the locality of the present city. As the southern term in us of this highway, on Lake Ontario, offered an eligible site for a trading-post, advantage was taken of such an opportunity to cut off trade from Chouagen (Oswego) by planting the original establishment of the Whites near the mouth of the Humber. Such was the French Fort Rouillé, built in 1749, and named in compliment to Antoine Louis Rouillé, Comte de Jouy, then colonial minister. This post was destroyed in 1756, to prevent it from falling into the hands of the English. It became better known as Fort Toronto than it had been by its proper French name, and later on passed into history as Old Fort Toronto, in distinction from the two other establishments to which the name was successively bequeathed. Fort Rouillé, by whatever name called, was never lost sight of entirely. Lossing’s Field Book of the War of 1812, New York, 1868, p. 593, has a cut which shows its appearance when it had been to some extent renovated in 1812-13. The exact site is now marked by a monument, lying alongside which is an inscribed stone. These memorials are pointed out to visitors, on the lakeshore, in the southwest corner of the present Exposition grounds, on the western side of the city of Toronto. After the abandonment of old Fort Rouillé the region round about remained for nearly half a century a wild whose solitude may have been only relieved by the lodges of a few Misisagas. Those Indians of Ojibwa affinities who had become members of the Iroquois confederation in 1746,three years before the fort was built. In 1791, Upper and Lower Canada were instituted by parliamentary measures which Pitt guided to success; the latter was practically the province of Quebec; the former became the province of Ontario, the refuge and future home of the United Empire Loyalists. For the capital of Ontario, a site was to be chosen in then unbroken wilds. The first provincial Parliament of the new province of Upper Canada was held in May, 1793, at Newark, the present town of Niagara, where the river of that name enters Lake Ontario. But this place was ineligible; the river became an international boundary; the guns of the United States Fort Niagara could be trained upon Newark; and in August of the same year the seat of government of the new province was transferred to the new site which had been surveyed to that end by Bouchette, and selected for the purpose by General and Governor John Graves Simcoe (b. Feb. 25th, 1752, d. Oct.6th, 1806). To this place Simcoe gave the name of York, after the duke, second son of George III. The evolution of this embryo of future greatness was slow; for many years "Little York," or "Muddy York," as it was styled by some in derision, had but a few hundred inhabitants; its maintenance was mainly due to the United Loyalists already mentioned. In April, 1813, the works by which York was defended, and which General Pike carried by assault, were those called Fort York; later they were known as Fort Toronto, or "the Fort at Toronto." The town which Simcoe had christened York did not resume the original designation of the locality till 1834, when it was incorporated as the city of Toronto.

stopped here

This magnificent metropolis, which so admirably illustrates the effect of American momentum upon English stability, is situated upon the north side of Lake Ontario, 39 miles northeast of Hamilton (which occupies the fonddu lac) and 310 miles west-southwest of Montreal; at the observatory the position is calculated to be in latitude 43°39′ 35″ N. and longitude 79° 23´ 39′´ W. of the Greenwich meridian. The city extends westward from the vicinity of the Don in the direction of the Humber, across the small stream known as Garrison creek. It thus has several miles of lake front on the south, at the bay or harbor of Toronto, partly shut off from the lake by low land which was once a peninsula, and some small islands, with an entrance only from the west; but the peninsula has been artificially cut off from the mainland. At its end stood a blockhouse, in a position known as Gibraltar point; another blockhouse stood at the mouth of the Don, on the left or east bank of that river. One now drives a few blocks from any hotel in the heart of the city to "old" Fort York, at present dismantled, but very much in evidence still of the scene of General Pike’s victory and mortal hurt. The visitor will be warned off the premises by the functionary who has these disjecta membra in charge, as lossing had been before I was; but may nevertheless keep on the main street or road through the frowning earth works, and will presently find himself on Garrison Common. This is the large level piece of ground, the middle of the lake front of which is occupied by the present barracks, or "new fort." At points included within the present garrison and parade ground were the positions of two outer defenses of old Fort York, respectively called at that time the Western and the Half Moon battery; these were the first and second obstacles for Pike to surmount in advancing upon the main defenses of York. Crossing Garrison Common in a few minutes we enter the Exposition grounds, at the further corner of which, to the left, and directly upon the lake shore, stand the Rouillé monument and inscribed cairn already mentioned, together with a historical cabin; a pier juts into the lake close by these objects. The direct distance between the Rouillé monument and old Fort York is about 6,000 feet — little over a mile by the road; the present barracks are nearly midway between those two places. Old Fort York occupies a position about the mouth of Garrison creek, between Front Street and the water’s edge, at the foot of Tecumseh Street, and close to Queen’s Wharf, in the midst of railroad tracks, freight houses, and depots. The magazine, which was exploded at the cost of many American andsome British lives, stood in a depression at or near the mouth of the creek, with its top nearly on a level with higher ground on either hand; it is said that its existence was not suspected by the enemy. It was a comparatively large structure of its kind, solidly built of heavy stonemasonry, and contained a great quantity of powder, shot, and shell. All the positions here in mention may be inspected in a leisurely drive of an hour. Those who have not been over the ground, or have not a city map at hand, will be helped to a clear understanding of the situation by the diagram given in Lossing, p. 590; together with the sketches there given of York, of Fort York, of the magazine which was blown up by General Sheaffe’s order, and often Western battery whose explosion was accidental. Of the later, the picture represents the remains as they were in 1860.

The conflicting accounts of uninformed, unconsciously biased, or willfully mendacious writers have shrouded in obsecurity, the clear and intelligible relation which can be given of the battle of York. Especially have the two explosions which occurred during the assault been confounded and falsified in history. It is necessary, at the outset, to dissociate in mind these two catastrophes, namely:(1) The accidental explosion of a portable magazine at the Western battery during the advance of the Americans upon the main works. (2) The intentional explosion of the fixed magazine during the retreat of the British from the mainworks. The latter was somewhat premature, owing to over much deal of the soldier who had been ordered to fire the train; but it was premeditated.

A diligent comparison of many different descriptions of the battle of York has satisfied me that the account in Whiting, Pike’s most formal biographer, leaves much to be desired, and that Lossing’s relation is decidedly preferable in most particulars. The latter gives, on the whole, the clearest and truest picture which any modern historian has painted. Lossing consulted the official reports of the commanders, both British and American; the accounts given by Thompson, Perkins, James, Auchinleck, Armstrong, Christy, Ingersoll, and others; Whiting’s Biography of Pike; Hough’s County histories; Roger’s Canadian History; Smith’s Canada; Cooper’s Naval History; Niles’ Register; the Portfolio; the Analectic Magazine; he had some manuscripts of actors in the scene, besides various verbal relations; and he went over the ground in person. In the following sketch I shall lean more heavily upon Lossing than upon Whiting; but for numerous particulars shall refer back of both to contemporaneous records and official reports, on both sides. I shall also adduce a certain obscure author, P. Finan, who is among those who witnessed the fight, and who describes what he saw in his little-known journal of a "Voyage to Quebec" in the year 1825, with "Recollections of Canada" during the late American War in the years 1812-13, Newry, printed by Alexander Peacock, 1828. H. A. Fay’s Collection of Official Documents, etc., 1 vol., 8vo, New York, 1817, gives General Dearborn’ and Commodore Chauncey’s reports to the Secretary of War and of the Navy, respectively, and the terms of the capitulation after the capture. "Brannan’s Official Letters", etc., 1 vol., 8vo, Washington, 1823, gives in full Pike’s vigorous and rigorous brigade order, pp. 144-146; the reports said of Dearborn and of Chauncey; and various other items. These and many other materials are also contained in earlier form in Niles’ Weekly Register, IV. Mar.-Sept.,1813. What here follows is derived mainly from the sources I have thus indicated, but also includes a certified copy of the most important one of the original Sheaffe documents in the Archives of Ontario at Ottawa.

General Pike’s brigade order for the attack on York appears as follows in Niles’ Register, IV. pp. 229, 230:

Sackett’s Harbor, April 25, 1813.

Brigade Order. When the debarkation shall take place on the enemy’s shore, Major Forsyth’s light troops, formed in four platoons, shall be first landed. They will advance a small distance from the shore, and form the chain to cover the landing of the troops. They will not fire unless they discover the approach of a body of the enemy, but will make prisoners of every person who may be passing, and send them to the general. They will be followed by the regimental platoons of the first brigade, with two pieces of Brooks’ artillery, one on the right and one on the left flank, covered by their musketry, and the small detachments of riflemen of the 15th and 16th Infantry. Then will be landed the three platoons of the reserve of the first brigade, under Major Swan.[M-17]Then Major Eustis, with his train of artillery, covered by his own musketry. Then Colonel M’Clure’s volunteers, in four platoons, followed by the 21st regiment, in six platoons. When the troops shall move incolumn, either to meet the enemy or take a position, it will be in the following order, viz.: First, Forsyth’s riflemen, with proper front and flankguards; the regiments of the first brigade, with their pieces; then three platoons of reserve; Major Eustis’ train of artillery; volunteer corps; 21st regiment; each corps sending out proper flank guards. When theenemy shall be discovered in front, the riflemen will form the chain, and maintain their ground until they have the signal (the preparative) or receive orders to retire, at which they will retreat with the greatest velocity, and form equally on the two flanks of the regiments of the first brigade, and then renew their fire. The three reserve platoons of this line under the orders of Major Swan, 100 yards in the rear of the colors, ready to support any part which may show an unsteady countenance. Major Eustis and his train will form in the rear of this reserve, ready to act where circumstances may dictate.

The second line will be composed of the 21st Infantry in six platoons, flanked by Colonel M’Clure’s volunteers, equally divided as light troops. The whole under the orders of Colonel Ripley.[M-18]

It is expected that every corps will be mindful of the honor of the American arms, and the disgraces which have recently tarnished our arms; and endeavor, by a cool and determined discharge of their duty, to support the one and wipe off the other. The riflemen in front will maintain their ground at all hazards, until ordered to retire, as will every corps of the army. With an assurance of being duly supported, should the commanding general find it prudent to withdraw the front line, he will give orders to retire by the heads of platoons, covered by the riflemen; and the second line will advance by the heads of platoons, pass the intervals, and form the line, call in the light troops, and renew the action. But the general may find it proper to bring up the second line on one or both flanks, to charge in columns, or perform a variety of man — uvres which it would be impossible to foresee. But as a general rule, whatever may be the directions of lines at the commencement ofthe action, the corps will form as before directed. If they then advance in line, it may be in parallel eschelons of platoons, or otherwise, as the ground or circumstances may dictate.

No man will load until ordered, except the light troops in front until within a short distance of the enemy, and then charge bayonets; thus letting the enemy see that we can meet them in their own weapons. Anyman firing or quitting his post without orders, must be put to instant death, as an example may be necessary. Platoon officers will pay the greatest attention to the coolness and aim of their men in the fire; their regularity and dressing in the charge. Courage and bravery in the field do not more distinguish the soldier than humanity after victory; and whatever examples the savage allies of our enemies may have given us, the general confidently hopes that the blood of an unresisting or yielding enemy will never stain the weapons of the soldiers of his column.

The unoffending citizens of Canada are many of them our own country men, and the poor Canadians have been forced into the war. Their property must therefore be held sacred, and any soldier who shall so far neglect the honor of his profession as to be guilty of plundering the inhabitants, shall, if convicted, be punished with death. But the commanding general assures the troops that, should they capture a large quantity of public stores, he will use his best endeavors to procure them a reward from his government.

This order shall be read at the head of each corps and every field officer shall carry a copy, in order that he may at any moment refer toit; and give explanations to his subordinates.

All those found in arms in the enemy’s country, shall be treated as enemies; but those who are peaceably following the pursuits of their various avocations, friends — and their property respected.

By order of Brigadier-general Z. M. Pike.
Charles G. Jones,[M-19]
Assistant aid-de-camp.

Of quite another character than the foregoing order is the next word which reaches us from General Pike — probably from the last letter he ever wrote. It is always the soldier, but now the son and not the officer who speaks in this letter addressed to his father. The extract is undated and unsigned, but was penned at Brownsville, near Sackett’s Harbor, on the day before the expedition sailed from the latter place. I cite from "Niles’ Register of Saturday", July 10th, 1813, p. 304, these affecting passages:

"I embark to-morrow in the fleet at Sackett’s Harbor, at the head of a column of 1,500 choice troops, on a secret expedition. If success attends my steps, honor and glory await my name — if defeat, still shall it be said we died like brave men, and conferred honor, even in death, on the American name.

"Should I be the happy mortal destined to turn the scale of war, will you not rejoice, O my father — MayHeaven be propitious, and smile on the cause of my country. But if we are destined to fall, may my fall bel ike Wolfe’s — to sleep in the arms of victory."

His aspiration was answered, for he turned the scale of war; his dream of glory came true, for he fell asleep, like Wolfe, in the arms of victory!

Commodore Isaac Chauncey’s fleet, which conveyed the American troops from Sackett’s Harbor to York, consisted of 14 vessels: the Madison, flagship; Oneida, Fair American, Hamilton, Governor Tompkins, Conquest, Asp, Pert, Julia, Growler, Ontario, Scourge, Lady of the Lake, and the Transport Raven.

On that fateful 27th of April, 1813, about seven o’clock in the morning, when this fleet had reached York, the intention was to land the troops at old Fort Rouillé, whence the advance to the assault of Fort York would have been only about a mile, along the lake front, over the level ground of present Garrison Common. But a strong east wind drove the boats "a considerable distance" leeward, to some wooded point in the direction of the Humber. Exactly how far this was does not appear; but there is evidence that it was not more than some fraction of a mile — probably not as far west of Fort Rouillé as the latter was west of Fort York. General Dearborn says, "about a mile and a half" from Fort York, which would be about half a mile west of Fort Rouillé; and the place called, Grenadier Point, has been named in this connection. Doubtless the whole of the troops were not landed at precisely the same spot. General Dearborn remained with the fleet, which was to bombard York after landing the troops under the command of General Pike. The former’s official report to Hon. John Armstrong, Secretary of War, dated Headquarters, York, Upper Canada, Apr. 28th, 1813, includes this passage(Brannan, p. 149):

I had been induced to confide the immediate command of the troopsin action to General Pike, from a conviction that he fully expected it, andwould be much mortified at being deprived of the honor, which he highly appreciated.

As rendered in Niles’ Register, IV. p. 179, it is to the same effect, but somewhat differently worded:

To the general I had been induced to confide the immediate attack,from a knowledge that it was his wish and that he would have been mortified had it not been given to him.

We will hear from Pike himself once more before he falls.It is before any landing has been effected. Forsyth’s boats are nearing the shore; they are fired upon from the woods,but have not yet answered a shot. Pike is standing on the deck of the flagship, surrounded by his staff, straining his eager eyes impatiently at the boats, which he sees have been driven beyond the intended point of debarkation. "’ByGod! I can’t stay here any longer!’ and addressing himself to his staff — ’Come, jump into the boat!’ which we immediately did, the commodore having reserved a boat specially for him and his suite; the little coxswain was ordered immediately to steer for the middle of the fray, and the balls whistled gloriously around; probably their number was owing to seeing so many officers in one boat; but we laughed at their clumsy efforts as we pressed forward with well-pulled oars."[M-20]

The first troops which effected a landing were Forsyth’s[M-21]Rifles, conveyed in two boats. Their debarkation was promptly resisted by a choice body of light troops fromFort York, consisting of a company of Glengary Fencibles,with some Indians, under Major Givens. From an advantageous position in the woods which had been taken up, the enemy opened a galling fire as our troops left the boats. Concerning this opening engagement I cite(Whiting, pp.300-303:

)

The riflemen were formed on the bank as promptly as possible, when the boats returned to the fleet for other troops. In the meantime, this gallant little band, assisted by some few other troops that were thrown on shore in other boats, sustained the brunt of the combat. The numbers in this initial struggle were about equal, and it became a fair and close fight, to be turned either way as re-enforcements should happen to arrive. The British light troops were choice men, and commanded by a brave officer.

Forsyth’s men were undisciplined, but had seen some desultory service on the Ogdensburg frontier, and had unbounded confidence in their leader, who was rather an extraordinary man, and regarded as a most promising partisan officer. He had peculiar notions as to the manner of training men. The common rules of discipline were looked upon by him with the utmost contempt. All he seemed to require of those under him was, that they should be good marksmen, and ready to follow him....

At the time of this expedition, Major Forsyth was a fat man, probably weighing some 200 pounds. The uniform of his men was green, and, at the time he landed, he wore a broad-skirted coat of that color, which was unbuttoned and thrown back, displaying a white vest spread over his ample chest, that afforded a mark for an enemy equal to the chalked circle of a common infantry target. He had on his head a broad-brimmed black hat. Soon after the landing, the armorer of his regiment, a favorite of both himself and his men, was killed. The skill of this manwas such as enabled him to give the rifle its most deadly character; and the efficiency of the regiment was consequently supposed, both by officers and men, to depend much upon him. When he fell, every man felt as if a deed had been perpetrated by the enemy that demanded revenge; and the whole detachment, from Major Forsyth down to the most indifferent marksman, entered into the combat with a fierce spirit of retaliation that, no doubt, contributed much to the obstinacy of the stand they made, and the unusual loss sustained by the enemy immediately opposed to them.

Taking to the woods in which the British light troops were posted, the riflemen, after their loose manner, placed themselves behind trees, and thus carried on the contest with their more concentrated, better ordered,and, therefore, more exposed opponents. It is said that Major Forsyth continued, throughout the action, to move to and fro, armed only with alight sword, immediately in the rear of his men, pointing out with a near nest solemnity that partook both of sorrow and anger, to one rifleman and another, some one of the enemy, and exclaiming that he was the man who had killed the favorite armorer. This suggestion was almost sure to be fatal to the enemy thus specially branded with the guilt of having taken off the best man of the corps. The British light troops were nearly all left on the ground they first occupied, being too strong to retreat while the landing was only partially made, and too much exposed to stand before such expertness of aim, rendered so fierce and unyielding by one of the chance shots of an opening fight.

The force under Forsyth was soon supported by MajorKing’s[M-22] battalion of the 15th Infantry, consisting of three companies — Captain John Scott’s, Captain White Youngs’, and that of Captain John Lambert Hoppock, who had been mortally wounded in the boats. When General Pike had landed with the whole body of his troops, the attacking force was represented by the 6th, 15th, 16th, and 21st Infantry, Colonel Maclure’s 3d regiment of New York Militia, and several pieces of artillery.

At the first sharp collision, as we have seen, the Britishwere defeated, not without much loss on both sides. On their retreat, the bugles sounded the advance, and the troops pressed forward along the lake shore toward FortYork, which was mean while bombarded from the fleet. One of General Pike’s staff says: "Our march was by the lake road in sections, but the route was so much intersected by streams and rivulets, the bridges over which had been destroyed by the enemy as they retreated, that we were considerably retarded in our progress. We collected logs, and by severe efforts at length contrived to pass over one field piece and a howitzer, which were placed at the head of our column, in charge of Captain Fanning[M-23] of the 3d Artillery; and thus we proceeded through a spacious wood, as we emerged from which we were saluted by a battery of 24-pounders. The general then ordered one of his aids (Fraser)and a sergeant to proceed to the right of the battery, in order to discover how many men were in the works. We did so, and reported to him the number, and that they were spiking their own guns. The general immediately ordered Captain Walworth of the 16th [sic] with his company of grenadiers to make the assault. Walworth gallantly ordered his men to trail arms and advance at the accelerated pace; but at the moment when they were ordered to recover and charge the enemy, the enemy broke in the utmost confusion, leaving several men wounded on the ground which they abandoned."

This first serious obstacle to Pike’s advance was theWestern battery already described, p. lxxvii, where the explosion occurred before Captain Walworth[M-24] could carry out the order to charge this work. This accident caused some loss of life to the defenders, but none to the assaulters. Lossing has, concerning it:

The wooden magazine of the battery, that had been carelessly left open, blew up, killing some of the men, and seriously damaging the defences. The dismayed enemy spiked their cannon and fled to the next,or Half Moon battery. Walworth pressed forward, when that, too, was abandoned, and he found nothing within but spiked cannon. She affeand his little army, deserted by the Indians, fled to the garrison near the governor’s house, and there opened fire upon the Americans. Pike ordered his troops to halt, and lie flat upon the grass, while MajorEustis,[M-25] with his artillery battery, moved to the front, and soon silenced the great guns of the enemy.

Finan is more circumstantial in describing the casualty which did so much to decide the fate of the day:

While this part of our force was contending with the enemy in the woods, an unfortunate accident occurred in the battery opposed to the fleet which proved a death blow to the little hope that might have been entertained of a successful issue to the proceedings of the day. A gun was aimed at one of the vessels, and the officers, desirous of seeing if the ball would take effect, ascended the bastion: In the meantime the artillery man,waiting for the word of command to fire, held the match behind him, as is usual under such circumstances; and the traveling magazine,a large wooden chest, containing cartridges for the great guns, beingopen just at his back, he unfortunately put the match into it and the consequence, as may be supposed, was dreadful indeed! Every man in the battery was blown into the air, and the dissection of the greater part of their bodies was inconceivably shocking! The officers were thrown from the bastion by the shock, but escaped with a few bruises;the cannons were dismounted, and consequently the battery was rendered completely useless.

I was standing at the gate of the garrison when the poor soldiers who escaped the explosion with a little life remaining, were brought in to the hospital, and a more afflicting sight could scarcely be witnessed. Their faces were completely black, resembling those of the blackest Africans;their hair frizzled like theirs, and their clothes scorched and emitting an effluvia so strong as to be perceived long before they reached one. One man in particular presented an awful spectacle: he was brought in a wheelbarrow, and from his appearance I should be inclined to suppose that almost every bone in his body was broken; he was lying in a powerless heap, shaking about with every motion of the barrow, from which his legs hung dangling down, as if only connected with his body by the skin, while his cries and groans were of the most heart-rending description.

Although Spartan valour was evinced by our little party, it proved unavailing against the numbers that pressed them upon all sides; and in consequence of the loss of the battery, and the reduction that had been made in the number of our troops, their ground was no longer tenable;but after nobly and desperately with standing their enemies for several hours, a retreat towards the garrison became inevitable, although every inch of the ground was obstinately disputed.

It is remarkable that Whiting’s relation of the attack has nothing about this marked affair; it is in fact impossible to follow the course of events in his narrative, between the conclusion of the opening engagement and the final explosion of the main magazine. Lossing, having brought our troops to a halt, when they were lying upon the grass,continues with the result of Major Eustis’ operations:

The firing from the garrison ceased and the Americans expected every moment to see a white flag displayed from the blockhouse in token of surrender. Lieut. Riddle[M-26] was sent forward to reconnoitre. GeneralPike, who had just assisted, with his own hands, in removing a wounded soldier to a comfortable place, was sitting upon a stump conversing with a huge British sergeant[M-27] who had been taken prisoner, his staff standing around him. At that moment was felt a sudden tremor of the ground,followed by a tremendous explosion near the British garrison. The enemy, despairing of holding the place, had blown up their powder magazine, situated upon the edge of the water at the mouth of a ravine,near where the buildings of the Great Western Railway stand. The effect was terrible. Fragments of timber, and huge stones of which the magazine walls were built, were scattered in every direction over a space of several hundred yards. When the smoke floated away, the scene was appalling. Fifty-two Americans lay dead, and 180 were wounded. So badly had the affair been managed that 40 of the British also lost their lives by the explosion.[M-28]

General Armstrong states, in his History of the War of 1812, that General Sheaffe said this explosion was accidental,his own soldiers having been involved in its effects.General Whiting repeats this. But both Armstrong andWhiting are clearly in error. If General Sheaffe ever said this, he said what he knew was untrue. His words — such as they may have been — may have referred to the earlier explosion at the Western battery and been mistaken toapply to the main explosion. We have his own reiterated writings, that the magazine was exploded by his order.One of these statements is made in a hurried letter, whose almost illegible handwriting betrays the state of mind to which this gentleman had been reduced. It was written while he was on his retreat to Kingston, and is addressed to his superior officer, Sir George Prevost. The published text before me reads in part as follows (italics editorial):

Haldimand, 30th April.

My Dear Sir George, — I have the mortification of reporting to you that York is in the possession of the enemy, it having on the 27th inst.been attacked by a force too powerful to resist with success. Sixteen vessels of various descriptions full of men, including their new ship thevMadison, formed their flotilla. The Grenadiers of the King’s suffered first in the action with the enemy (in which Captain W. Neale was killed), and afterwards severely, in connection with other corps, by the accidental explosion of a battery magazine, which at the same time disabled the battery. I caused our grand magazine to be blown up....

I am, my dear Sir George, your very faithfully devoted servant,
R. H. Sheaffe.

Another letter from General Sheaffe, dated Kingston,May 5th, when he had become more composed in mindthan he seems to have been during his inglorious if not disgraceful flight, gives a more coherent account and many further details. I cite it in full, from the original MS. now in the Department of Archives at Ottawa, as kindly copied and certified for me by Mr. L. P. Sylvain of the Library ofParliament:

Kingston, 5th May, 1813.

Sir,

I did myself the honour of writing to Your Excellency on my route from York to communicate the mortifying intelligence that the Enemy had obtained possession of that place on the 27th of April, and I shall now enter into a fuller detail, than I was enabled to do at the date of that letter.

In the evening of the 26th of April I received information that many Vessels had been seen from the Highlands to the Eastward of York, soon after daylight the next morning the Enemy’s Vessels were discovered lying to not far from the shore of the peninsula in front of the town; they soon afterwards, sixteen in number of various descriptions, made sail with a fresh breeze from the [p. 2] eastward, led by the Ship lately built at Sackett’s harbour, and anchored off the point where the french fort [Rouillé] formerly stood; many boats full of troops were soon discovered assembling near the Commander’s Ship, apparently with an intention of effecting a landing on the ground off which he was anchored: our troops were ordered into the Ravine in the rear of the Government Gardenand fields; Major Givens and the Indians with him were sent forward through the wood to oppose the landing of the Enemy — The Company of Glengary Light Infantry was directed to support them, and the Militia not having arrived at the Ravine, The Grenadiers of the King’s Regiment and the small portion of the Royal Newfoundland Fencibles belonging to the Garrison of York were moved on, led by Lt ColonelHeathcote of that corps, commanding the Garrison; this movement was directed to be made within the wood, [p. 3] parallel to the Lake-side, and only so far from it, as not to be discovered by the Enemy’s Vessels, several of which were not at a great distance from the shore: Captain Eustace’s company of the King’s Regiment, and some Militia that were quartered at the east end of the town, and had been left there during the night, lest the Enemy might make some attempt on that flank, were ordered, with the exception of a small party of the Militia, to join these troops — which was soon effected: while these operations were going onMajor General Shaw, Adjudant General of Militia led a portion of the Militia on a road at the back of the wood to watch our rear, and to act according to circumstances; by some mistake he led the Glengary companyaway from the direction assigned to it, to accompany this detachment,so that it came late into action, instead of being near the Indian sat its commencement; the movement of the other troops was retarded[p. 4] by the difficulty of the wood, while the Enemy being aided by the wind, rapidly gained the shore under cover of a fire from the commodore’ship and other vessels, and landed in spite of a spirited opposition from major Givens and his small band of Indians; the Enemy was shortly afterwards encountered by our handful of troops, Captain McNeal of the King’s Regiment was early killed while gallantly leading his Company which suffered severely: the troops fell back. I succeeded in rallying them several times, and a detachment of the King’s with some Militia, whom I had placed near the edge of the wood to protect our left Flankrepulsed a column of the Enemy which was advancing along the bank at the Lake side: but our troops could not maintain the contest against the greatly superior and increasing numbers of the Enemy — they retired under cover of our batteries, which were engaged with some of their Vessels, that had begun to beat up towards [p. 5] the harbour, when their troops landed, occasionally firing, and had anchored at a short distance to the westward of the line from the Barracks to Gibraltar Point; from that situation they kept up a heavy fire on our batteries, on the Block House and Barracks, and on the communications between them, some of theirGuns being thirty two pounders; to return their fire, we had two complete twelve pounders, and old condemned guns without trunnions ( — — eighteen — — pounders) which, after being proved had been stocked and mounted under the direction of Lieut. Ingouville of the Royal Newfound land Regiment, whom I had appointed Assistant Engineer; a twelve pounder of the same description was added during the Engagement;with these defective means the Enemy was kept at bay for some time,when, by some unfortunate accident, the traveling Magazine at theWestern battery blew up and killed and wounded a considerable number of men [italics editorial]; many of them belonging to the [p. 6]Grenadier Company of the King’s Regiment, the battery was crippled,the platform being torn up, and one of the eighteen pounders overturned:the Magazine was replaced and the battery restored to some order, but it was evident that our numbers and means of defence were inadequate to the task of maintaining possession of York against the vast superiority of force brought against it, though providentially little mischief had hitherto been done by the long continued cannonade of the Enemy, except to some of the buildings: the troops were withdrawn towards the town, and the grand Magazine was at the same time blown up [italics editorial], the Enemy was so near to it, that he sustained great loss, and was, for a time, driven back by the explosion; some of our own troops were not beyond the reach of fragments of thestone, though they escaped with very little injury; Captain Loring, my aide-de-camp, received a severe contusion, and [p. 7] the horse he rode was killed.

The troops were halted at a ravine not far to the westward of the ship yard, I there consulted with the Superior Officers, and it being too apparent that a further opposition would but render the result more disastrous, some of the Enemy’s vessels indicating an intention to move up the harbour, in order to co-operate with their land forces, I ordered the troops of the line to retreat on the road to Kingston, which was effected without any annoyance from the Enemy; when we had proceeded some miles we met the Light Company of the King’s Regimenton its march for Fort George, I had sent an express the preceding evening to hasten its movement, but it was at too great a distance to be able to join us at York.

The ship on the stocks and the naval stores were destroyed to prevent the Enemy from getting possession of them. [p. 8] An attempt to set fire to the Gloucester that was fitting out for purposes of transport,proved abortive; she was aground a mere hulk, her repairs not being half finished: I have been informed that the enemy succeeded in getting her off, and putting her into a state to be towed away; a number of shipwrights having arrived from Sackett’s harbour with the expectation of employing them in a similar task on our new ship.

The accounts of the number of the Enemy landed vary from eighteen hundred and ninety to three thousand [!], our force consisted of a Bombardier and twelve Gunners of the Royal Artillery to assist whom men were drawn from other corps, two companies of the 8th or King’s Regiment,one of them, the Grenadiers, being on its route for Fort George,about a company in number, of the Royal [p. 9] Newfoundland regiment,and one of the Glengary Light Infantry, and about three hundredMilitia and Dock Yard men; the quality of some of these troops was of so superior a description, and their general disposition so good, that under less unfavourable circumstances we might have repulsed the Enemy in spite of his numbers, or have made him pay dearly for success;as it was, according to the reports that have reached me, his loss was much greater than ours, a return of which I have the honour of transmitting, except of that of the Militia, of which a return has not yet been received; but I believe it to have been inconsiderable: Donald McLean Esqr Clerk of the House of Assembly gallantly volunteered his services with a musket, and was killed.

[p. 10] Captain Jarvis of the Incorporated Militia, a meritorious Officer, who had a share in the successes at Detroit and Queenston, had been sent with a party of Militia in three batteaux for the Militia Clothing, which had been left on the road from Kingston, he came to meduring the action to report his arrival, and soon afterwards he was severely wounded: a few of the Indians (Missasagus & Chipeways)were killed and wounded, among the latter were two chiefs.

Thinking it highly probable that the Enemy would pay an early visit to York, I had remained there long beyond the period I had originally assigned for my departure to fort George, in order to expedite the preparations which the means in my power enabled me to make for the defence of the place; Your [p. 11] Excellency knows that I had intended to place Colonel Myers, Acting Quarter Master General, in the command there, at least for a time; I afterwards learnt that Colonel Young was in movement towards me with the 8th or King’s Regt. I then decided to give him the Command to avoid the inconvenience of seperating (sic) the head of a department from me, and being informed that he was to move up by himself as speedily as possible, I was for some time in daily expectation of seeing him; at length, having reason to believe that he was to accompany one of the divisions of his Regiment, I wrote to him both by the land and by the water route to come to me without delay; about the 25th of April I received certain intelligence, of what had been [p. 12] before rumoured, that he was detained at Kingston by a severe illness, and on the 26th I learnt that Colonel Myers was to leave Fort George that day for York, I therefore determined to wait for his arrival, and to leave him in the command until Colonel Young might be in a state to relieve him; it was in the evening of the same day that I heard of the approach of the Enemy: I have thought it proper to enter into this explanation, as Your Excellency may have expected that I had returned to Fort George before the period atwhich the attack was made on York. I propose remaining here until I shall have received Your Excellency’s Commands.

I have the honour to be,
With great respect,
Your Excellency’s
Most obedient
humble servant
[Signed] R. H. Sheaffe.
M. Gen. Command.

His Excellency
Sir. George Prevost. Bt
et. et. et.

Certified a true copy of the original letter in the Department ofArchives, Ottawa.
[Signed] L. P. Sylvain, Assist. Libr., Nov. 2d, 1894.

Here is the clear and intelligible testimony of the British commanding general to the facts that there were two explosions,one of which was accidental and destructive to hisown men, the other designed and executed by his own command.It is believed to have been a little premature, in the confusion of an evacuation that was nothing short of a rout, before the defenders were quite out of reach of its effects; but that they suffered little from what wrought such havoc with the Americans, is incontestable. The ethics of the catastrophe I leave to be discussed by professional military critics; but it seems to me that General Sheaffe was justified in inflicting the utmost possible injury upon the enemy, and that he would have been chargeable with culpable neglect of duty if he had allowed valuable munitions of war to fall into their hands.

Before resuming the main thread of this painful narration I will introduce two accounts, both by eye-witnesses.

One of these is contained in an extract of a letter from a field officer in the force which landed at York, name not given, to the War Department, as published in Niles’ Register, IV. p. 193. It is explicit regarding both explosions, though loose in statement of numbers killed by each, and in some other respects:

The column of attack consisted of the 6th, 15th, 16th, and 21st regiments of infantry, and a detachment of the light and heavy artillery. Major Forsyth’s corps of riflemen, and Lieut. Col. M’Clure’s corps of volunteers acted on the flanks. There was a long piece of woods to go through, which offered many obstructions to our heavy ordnance. As was expected, we were there annoyed on our flanks by a part of theBritish and Indians, with a six-pounder and two howitzers. One of the enemies batteries [the Western] accidentally blew up, by which they lost 50 men of the 8th regiment. A part of our force was detached from our column, as it came into the open ground, who carried the second battery by storm. The troops were halted a few minutes to bring up the heavy artillery to play on the blockhouse. General Sheaffe, despairing of holding the town, ordered fire to be put to the magazine, in which there were 500 barrels of powder, many cart loads of stone, and an immense quantity of iron, shells and shot. The explosion was tremendous. The column was raked from front to rear. General Pike and his three aids,and 250 officers and men were killed or wounded in the column. Not withstanding this calamity and the discomfiture that might be expected to follow it, the troops gave three cheers, instantly formed the column,and marched on toward the town. General Sheaffe fled and left his papers and baggage behind him.[M-29]

Finan gives a vivid picture of what he saw of the catastrophe.It must be taken with some allowance, perhaps,for the force of the impression which the terrible scene made upon him at the moment, and the subsequent insistencewith which his memory dwelt upon such a spectacle;but it can hardly be much overdrawn:

The governor’s house, with some smaller buildings, formed a square,at the center battery, and under it the grand magazine, containing a large quantity of powder, was situated. As there were only two or three gun sat this battery, and it but a short distance from the garrison, the troops did not remain in it, but retreated to the latter. When the Americans commanded by one of their best generals, Pike, reached this smallbattery, instead of pressing forward, they halted, and the general sat down on one of the guns; a fatal proceeding — for, in a few minutes, his advance guard, consisting of about 300 men and himself, were blown into the air by the explosion of the grand magazine.

Some time before this horrible circumstance took place, the vessels had commenced firing upon the garrison, which obliged the females, and children, &c. to leave it; we therefore retired into the country, to the house of an officer of the militia, where we remained a short time;but feeling anxious to know the fate of the day, I left the house without the knowledge of my mother, and was proceeding toward the garrison when the explosion took place. I heard the report, and felt a tremendous motion in the earth, resembling the shock of an earthquake; and, looking towards the spot, I saw an immense cloud ascend into the air. I was not aware at the moment what it had been occasioned by, but it had an awfully grand effect; at first it was a great confused mass of smoke,timber, men, earth, &c. but as it rose, in a most majestic manner, it assumed the shape of a vast balloon. When the whole mass had ascended to a considerable height, and the force by which the timber,&c. were impelled upwards became spent, the latter fell from the cloud and spread over the surrounding plain. I stopped to observe the cloud,which preserved its round shape while it remained within my view. I then advanced towards the garrison, but had not proceeded much farther until I discovered our little party collected in a close body between the town and that place, which latter they had been obliged to evacuate.

It is said, "Death loves a shining mark." One of the missiles that hurtled down on that devoted band sought out their heroic leader with fatal effect. A piece of rock fell onGeneral Pike’s back, and "broke in upon the very springs of life," to use Whiting’s words. A sadly realistic memento of the speedily fatal injury reaches us from one of his aids,who was by his side and was himself gravely wounded.Lieutenant Fraser says, in a private letter he wrote byPike’s special injunction, which appeared in the Aurora, and afterward in Niles’ Register, IV. p. 225: "Without the honor of a personal acquaintance, I address you at the particular order of the late General Pike. After he had been mortally wounded, his words were exactly these: ’...I am mortally wounded — my ribs and back are stove in — write my friend D... and tell him what you know of the battle — and to comfort my ....’ Some things elsehe said, on which I shall again write you; and many thing she said for your ear have escaped me through the severity of my own bruises."

The dying general was carried to a boat at the lake side and conveyed to the Pert, whence he was taken aboard the flagship Madison. Some recorded words of his last moments need not be scanned with critical eye. When those who bore their fallen leader reached the boat the huzza of the troops fell upon his ears. "What does it mean — " he feebly asked. "Victory!" was the reply; "theUnion Jack is coming down, General — the Stars and Stripesare going up!" The dying hero’s face lighted up with as mile of ecstasy. His spirit lingered a few hours. Before the end came, the British flag was brought to him. He made a sign to place it under his head; and thus he expired.[M-30]

Military history hardly furnishes a closer parallel than that between the death of Pike before York and of Wolfe before Quebec. Each led to the assault; each conquered; each fell in the arms of victory; each is said to have pillowed his head on the stricken colors of the defenders. On the other hand, no contrast could be more obtrusive than that between the fall of Brock before QueenstownHeights and the conduct of his successor, Sheaffe, at York. The latter fled on the heels of disaster across the Don and on toward Kingston; even his personal baggage and papers fell into the hands of his enemy; the very terms of the surrender of York were agreed upon by others, in the absence of its late defender. But it is needless to pursue this subject. General Sheaffe has by none been more severely criticised than by British writers.

When General Pike fell, the command devolved by seniorityupon Colonel Pearce,[M-31] of the 16th Infantry, until GeneralDearborn arrived upon the scene. Lieutenant Riddle’s detachment was so near the place of explosion that it escaped the deadly shower; but the Americans scattered in dismay at the catastrophe. They were rallied by Brigade-Major Hunt and Lieutenant-Colonel Mitchell of the 3d Artillery. The column was formed again and led into the captured town without further resistance. Colonel Pearce sent a flag, demanding immediate and unconditional surrender — and surrender it was, with the single stipulation that private property should be respected. As soon as practicable General Dearborn left the fleet for York, where he was in command before night fell. His first dispatch to the Secretary of War appears as follows in the text of Fay’sCollection, p. 81, and is substantially the same in Niles’Register, IV. p. 178:

Headquarters, York, Capital of U. C.
April 27, 1813 — 8 o’clock, P. M.

Sir — We are in full possession of this place, after a sharp conflict, in which we lost some brave officers and soldiers. General Sheaffe commanded the British troops, militia, and Indians, in person. — We shall be prepared to sail for the next object of the expedition, the first favourable wind. I have to lament the loss of the brave and active Brig. Gen.Pike.

I am, &c.
H. Dearborn.

Hon. J. Armstrong.

The official reports of General Dearborn and of CommodoreChauncey to their respective Secretaries of War and of the Navy appear in full in Niles’ Register, IV. pp. 178-180;in Brannan’s Official Letters, pp. 146-149, and in Fay’s Collectionof Official Documents, pp. 81-85. The text of Dearborn’sin Niles is in greater part as follows:

Headquarters, York, Capital of Upper Canada,
April 28, 1813.

Sir:

After a detention of some days by adverse winds, we arrived at this place yesterday morning, and at eight o’clock commenced landing the troops, about three miles westward from the town, and one mile and a half from the enemy’s works. The wind was high and in unfavorable direction for the boats, which prevented the landing of the troops at a clear field, the site of the ancient French fort Toronto [Rouillé]. It prevented, also, many of the armed vessels from taking positions which would have most effectually covered our landing, but everything that could be done was effected.

The riflemen under Major Forsyth first landed, under a heavy fire from the Indians and other troops. General Sheaffe commanded in person. He had collected his whole force in the woods near the point where the wind compelled our troops to land. His force consisted of 700 regulars and militia, and 100 Indians. Major Forsyth was supported as promptly as possible; but the contest was sharp and severe for nearly half an hour, and the enemy were repulsed by a number far inferior to theirs. As soon as General Pike landed with 700 or 800 men and the remainder of the troops were pushing for the shore, the enemy retreated to their works. Our troops were now formed on the ground originally intended for their landing, advanced through a thick wood, and after carrying one [the Western] battery by assault, were moving in columns toward the main work; when within 60 rods of this, a tremendous explosion took place from a magazine previously prepared, which threw out such immense quantities of stone as most seriously to injure our troops.I have not yet been able to collect the returns of the killed and wounded; but our loss will I fear exceed 100 [see p. xci]; and among those I have to lament the loss of that brave and excellent officer,Brigadier-General Pike, who received a concussion from a large stone,which terminated his valuable life within a few hours. His loss will be severely felt.

Previously to this explosion the enemy had retired into the town,excepting a party of regulars, to the number of 40, who did not escape the effects of the shock....

General Sheaffe moved off with the regular troops and left the commanding officer of the militia to make the best terms he could. In the mean time all further resistance on the part of the enemy ceased, and the outlines of a capitulation were agreed on....

I have the honor to be, Sir, &c.,
[Signed] Henry Dearborn.

Hon. Gen. John Armstrong,
Secretary of War, Washington.

The "Terms of capitulation entered into on the 27th of April, 1813, for the surrender of the town of York, in Upper Canada, to the Army and Navy of the United States, under the command of Major-General Dearborn and CommodoreChauncey," appear as follows, in Niles’ Register, IV. p.180 — omitting the clauses which relate to the disposition of individuals as prisoners of war:

That the troops, regular and militia, at this post, and the naval officers and seamen, shall be surrendered prisoners of war. The troops, regular and militia, to ground their arms immediately, on parade, and the naval officers and seaman to be immediately surrendered.

That all public stores, naval and military, shall be immediately given up to the commanding officers of the army and navy of the United States.That all private property shall be guaranteed to the citizens of the town of York.

That all papers belonging to the civil officers shall be retained by them. That such surgeons as may be procured to attend the wounded of the British regulars and Canadian militia shall not be considered prisoners of war.

These articles bear the signatures of: Lieutenant-ColonelG. E. Mitchell,[M-32] 3d U. S. Artillery; Major S. S. Conner,[M-33]aid-de-camp to General Dearborn; Major William King,15th U. S. Infantry; Lieutenant Jesse D. Elliott, U. S.Navy; Lieutenant-Colonel W. Chewitt, commanding 3d regiment of York Militia; Major W. Allen (or Allan), of the same; and F. Gaurreau, "lieut. M. Dpt." — the last name perhaps misprinted.

General Pike’s body was prepared at York and conveyed to Sackett’s Harbor for interment. It was first buried atFort Tompkins, at a little distance from the ship house,together with that of his aid-de-camp, Captain Nicholson,[M-34]who had been mortally wounded by his side. Among the defenses of Sackett’s Harbor was one named Fort Pike,which stood on Black River bay. A view of this work, as it was in 1855, is given by Lossing. Madison Barracks was built close by Fort Pike, soon after the war, and in the burying-ground there were deposited the remains of several officers, to whose memories a simple wooden monument was erected in 1819. Lossing figures this, p. 617, as it was when he examined it in July, 1855, "more leaning than the Pisa tower." In 1860 it was rapidly crumbling into dust;the urn which had surmounted it was gone, and the inscription was illegible. A part of the legend on the west panel,copied by Lossing at his previous visit, had been: "In memory of Brigadier General Z. M. Pike, killed at York,U. C. 27th April, 1813."

A tablet to the memory of General Pike has for many years been set in St. Michael’s church, at Trenton, N. J. For a description of this object and a copy of the inscription I am indebted to the courteous attentions of the rector,Rev. O. S. Bunting. It consists of a marble slab, about 36 inches high by 20 inches wide, inserted in the outer wall of the church on the east side, the base being about two feet from the ground. On this slab is carved in relief an urn, which occupies the whole surface, as nearly as the shape of an urn can fill a rectangle; and on the urn is engraven the following inscription:

Sacred
to the memory of
GEN. Z. M. PIKE,
of the U. S. Army,
who fell in defence
of his country
on the 27th April
A. D. 1813,
at York
Upper Canada.

On the base is inscribed: "This small tribute of respect is erected by his friend, Z. R." The stone is in a good state of preservation, and its position affords considerable security.Mr. Bunting has no particulars of the erection of the tablet, and does not identify "Z. R."

Upon the fall of York, the press of the whole country teemed with jubilant notices of the auspicious event — the first signal success of our arms after a period of defeat, doubt, and almost despair. The death of Pike was on every tongue, in terms of affection for the man and honor to his name, coupled with expressions of horror and detestation of the manner in which he and so many of his companions had met their fate. The feeling in the latter regard was spontaneous and natural under the circumstances — it appears differently in the cold gray light of history. Among uncounted tributes to Pike’s memory, a few may be selected for reproduction in the present biography.

The editor of Niles’ Register was in the habit of dedicating a completed volume. The fourth volume, from Mar.to Sept., 1813, is inscribed: "In Testimony of Respect to the Memory of Zebulon Montgomery Pike, Brigadier-General:who fell gloriously before York, in Upper Canada.And James Lawrence, Captain in the Navy: Killed on board the Chesapeake frigate, fighting the Shannon. This volume of the Weekly Register, is dedicated. The former happily expired on the conquered flag of the foe, the latter died exclaiming, ’Don’t give up the ship.’"

The same volume prints the following tribute in No. 14, for the week ending June 5th, 1813, pp. 228, 229:

It has been the lot of few men, unassisted by many adventitious circumstances to acquire and possess that high confidence and respect of all classes of his fellow-citizens, the late General Pike so happily enjoyed. Without the splendor of achievement that surrounds the fortunate hero,and commands the applause of the populace, the lamented man forced his way into the public affection by the power of his virtues and strength of his talents alone. Careless of popularity, a great and good name was "buckled on him" by a discriminating people. He was anæg is of the army; and the soldiery looked upon him with admiration and reverence; love, mixed with the fear of offending his nice ideas of right, governing them all. He was a severe disciplinarian; but had the felicity to make his soldiers assured that his strictness had for its object their glory — their ease — their preservation and safety. With a mind conscious of its own rectitude, he was not easily diverted from his purpose; and difficulty only invigorated exertion. To all the sweetness of a familiar friend, he added a strength of remark and pungency of observation, that delighted all around him. Though the camp was his delight, he was fitted for any company; and could make himself agreeable on every proper occasion. His courage was invincible, for it was the result of his reason; and his death is a proof of it. The pride of his countrymen in arms, the pattern for a military life, he fell, at the moment of victory, on the first opportunity that had been afforded to reduce to practice the perfection of his theory — "but he fell like a man."His transcendent qualities were opening to the view; but they were nipped in the bud by the base stratagem of a beaten foe.[M-35] His name is unperishable; and will descend to posterity with the Warrens, Montgomerys and Woosters, of the other war. Though dead, he shall yet speak to the army of the United States. His scheme of tactics andpractice of discipline shall be the criterion of the soldier’s worth. He has left behind him many accomplished scholars, who, "while memory holds her seat," shall teach his rules to others, and sacredly preserve them as landmarks whereby to govern themselves. The labors of the illustrious dead are not lost. His body has descended to the tomb, and the gallant spirit taken its flight to Him that gave it — but his virtues shall live, and be with us, many generations.

Mr. Niles’ eulogy concludes with a dramatic incident which commends itself for insertion here, in further illustration of the strong hold General Pike acquired upon public sentiment:

It may not be amiss, perhaps, to notice a humble mark of respect offered by the managers of the Baltimore theatre, a few evenings ago, to the memory of the general. The house was crowded in consequence of several spectacles designed in honor of the day (the review of the Baltimore brigade). Between the second and third acts of the play the curtain slowly, but unexpectedly, rose to solemn music, and exhibited a lofty obelisk on which was inscribed "Z. M. Pike, Brigadier General — Fell gloriously before York — March [April] 27, 1813." On the left hand of the monument was that elegant actress, Mrs. Green, in character asColumbia, armed, kneeling on one knee, and pensively pointing with her spear to the name of the hero. Her dress was uncommonly splendid and very appropriate to the idea [she] designed to sustain. On the other side was a lady, an elegant figure, dressed in the deepest mourning,gracefully leaning against the pedestal, immovably fixed, "in all the solemn majesty of woe." The curtain being fairly raised, a death-like silence for a considerable time reigned in the house, the music excepted;which did not interrupt the pleasing melancholy by any ill-timed boisterousness:but soon the feelings of the people burst forth in one unanimous expression of applause, such has been rarely witnessed, certainly never surpassed in any country, on a similar occasion.

In the House of Representatives of the national Congress,on Tuesday, July 27th, 1813, the following resolution was submitted by Mr. Nelson:

Resolved, That a committee be appointed to examine and report on the propriety of conferring public honors on the memory of JamesLawrence, late of the U. States frigate Chesapeake, and of Zebulon M.Pike, late a brigadier-general in the armies of the U. States, whose distinguished deaths in the service of their country add lustre to the characterof the American nation; the propriety of adopting, as the peculiar children of the Republic, the sons of those distinguished heroes; and the propriety of making provision for the support and comfort of the families of these deceased officers.

Among the many measures which were adopted to honor General Pike’s name and fame, there is perhaps none more marked than the action of the officers of the regiment of which he was the colonel. We have a glimpse of the hearts that still beat for him in the proceedings recorded in the Register of May 14th, 1814, VI.p. 176:

Burlington, April 29, 1814.

At a meeting of the Board of Honor of the 15th, or Pike’s regiment held on the 24th inst., it was resolved, that the following articles of the constitution governing said Board be carried into effect. — "Article 2d. Each succeeding 27th April, the day on which the immortal Pike fell;the standard will be dressed in mourning; each officer to wear crape,and all unnecessary duties dispensed with during the day, as a token of respect for our departed friend and commander," and that captain Vandalsem, captain Barton, and lieutenant Goodwin be a committee of arrangement for the day.[M-36]

Agreeably to the above resolution, the regiment formed at eleven o’clock a. m. on the grand parade, and proceeded in funeral order through town, to the court house square, and from thence through Pearl street, to the cantonment, where by the request of the commanding officer, lieutenant Goodwin delivered the following pertinent address:

Fellow soldiers — Thus far have we solemnized this day in commemoration of the immortal father of our regiment, our beloved Pike. When our political horizon was darkened by the confusion that pervaded the whole world, he was among the first that advanced to meet our barbarous and unjust enemy. Stimulated by a love of country, and a thirst for glory, he solicited with ardor, the honor of facing the enemy’s batteries on all occasions, he panted to invade in the just cause of hiscountry, and lived with the lively hope of perpetuating our freedom and handing it down unpolluted to future generations.

As an officer, the remotest corners of our country are filled with his fame. Let the learned record his deeds, and let us improve the principle she has left imprinted in our minds, and like him live but "for honor and happiness in this life, and fame after death." Nor let us confound him with the list of ordinary heroes. He will compare with [Joseph]Warren and [Richard] Montgomery, for like them he fell at the head of his column, bravely fighting in his country’s cause.

With body shattered by an inhuman and unequalled explosion, he smiled in death, while our flag waved triumphant in his sight, and expired without regret, on a pillow purchased with his life.

May the omnipotent hand which directs all things, cause his spirit to hover around our councils in the field, and at all times be with his beloved regiment.

After which the regiment fired three vollies and retired to their quarters.

White Youngs,[M-37] capt 15th inf.
President of the Board, pro tem.
Danl. E. Burch,[M-38] lt. 15th inf.
Secretary of the Board, pro tem.

Within some months, probably, of General Pike’s death,a man-of-war was named in his honor. The Register for Aug. 7th, 1813, p. 374, describes it: "The General Pike isa strong, stout, and well built vessel. Length on deck 140 feet, beam 37 feet, burthen about 900 tons — has 14 ports on a side, and carries on the main deck long 24’s — has also long24’s on the forecastle and poop, (one each), moving on acircle, and four guns on her top gallant forecastle; in all 34 guns." General A. W. Greely, who interested himself to procure the information, tells me that this frigate, a twin ship with the Madison, was built in 63 days and launched onLake Ontario, at Sackett’s Harbor, where she barely escaped destruction by fire, owing to the mistaken zeal of an officer who applied the torch, supposing the American victory to be a defeat; and that it does not appear that the vessel was ever brought into action.

I have already alluded to the Fort Pike on Lake Ontario. There was another Fort Pike, the name of which still finds place in current gazetteers. This was a military post onPetites Coquilles island, in Orleans parish, Louisiana, 35 miles E. N. E. of New Orleans. While it is not probable that all the counties, towns, etc., called "Pike" were named for our hero, certainly most of them bear his own name,alone or in combination or composition. There is a Pike county in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana,Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.There are about 20 Pike townships in different counties of Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Pike is the name of several small places in Illinois, New York,North Carolina, and Ohio. Pike City is a village in SierraCo., Cal. Pike Creek is a township of Shannon Co., Mo.,and another township, of Morrison Co., Minn., besides designating the stream itself which flows through the latter:see beyond, pp. 104, 123, 316. Pike Five Corners is a hamlet of Wyoming Co., N. Y. Pikeland is a station on the Pickering Valley R. R., in Chester Co., Pa. Pike Mills is a hamlet in Pike township, Potter Co., Pa. Pike rapidsare those in the Mississippi, otherwise Knife rapids: see pp.100, 104, 122. Pike’s bay is the gulf at the southern part ofCass lake: see pp. 157, 158, 324. Pike’s fork of the Arkansaw river, is present Grape creek: see pp. 463, 482. Pike’s island, in the Mississippi at the mouth of the Minnesota river, is historic: see pp. 76, 197, 239. Pike’s mountain is the range of bluffs opposite Prairie du Chien: see p. 37.Pike’s Peak is not only the famous mountain so called,but a hamlet in Brown Co., Ind., a hamlet in WayneCo., Mich., and a mining-camp in Deer Lodge Co.,Mont. Pike Station is a village in Wayne Co., O.Piketon is a hamlet in Stoddard Co., Mo., and a village in Pike Co., O. Piketon or Pikeville is the capital of PikeCo., Ky. Pikesville or Pikeville is a village in BaltimoreCo., Md.; a hamlet in Pike township, Berks Co.,Pa.; the capital of Marion Co., Ala.; a post-office ofPike Co., Ind.; a hamlet in Pikeville township, WayneCo., N. C.; a village in Darke Co., O.; and the capital ofBledsoe Co., Tenn. Some of these places are no doubt named for other persons of the same surname; some are called for the pike, a fish, as is the case with several Pike rivers, creeks, or ponds not included in the above list; and some may refer to a turnpike road, or have yet another implication.

To those of the foregoing geographical and political names which commemorate our hero is to be added the designation of "Pikes" as an epithet of the "Forty-niners"and later emigrants who navigated the great plains with their "prairie schooners." Thus Mr. Prentis, in the address already cited, says, pp. 193, 194:

To these people thus described, and to all who bore to them a family resemblance, and who in 1849 and in subsequent years crossed the Plains to California, came to be applied, by whom I know not, the general name of"Pikes." Various explanations have been given of the origin of the name.The most reasonable one is, that, there are in Missouri and Illinois two large counties named Pike, and separated from each other by the Mississippi river. In 1849 an immense emigration set in from these counties to California. In consequence, the traveler bound for the States, meeting teams, and asking the usual question, "Where are you from — "was answered frequently with, "Pike county" meaning in some cases one Pike county, in some cases the other. This led to the general impression that everybody on the road was from Pike county, or that the inhabitants of Pike had all taken the road. Hence the general name of "Pikes," as applied to emigrants, especially to those traveling from Missouri, and, generally, those migrating from southern Illinois andsouthern Indiana. Thus the popular song — the only poetry I ever heard of applied to this class of "movers," commences:

"My name it is Joe Bowers,

I’ve got a brother Ike;

I’m bound for Californy,

And I’m all the way from Pike."

Pike County, Ill., and Pike County, Mo., are certainly both named for the general, and I have no doubt that Mr.Prentis’ explanation of "Pikes" is correct. With the above doggerel compare the slang phrase noted beyond, p. 454,and duly legended as the head-line of p. 457.

Another curious word, to which Pike has given rise indirectly, is "Peaker," as a designation of persons who came to the vicinity of Pike’s Peak. Thus, we read inColonel Meline’s book, p. 89: "Most of the people who have settled on these farms [between Colorado Springs andDenver] were disappointed ’Peakers’ — either those who had thrown down the shovel to take up the plough, or those who, with exhausted means, found a long mountain journey still before them after they had reached the Peak."

There is a sameness about the many published portraits of Pike which shows that they were probably all taken from one original painting. Lossing’s cut looks a little different from the rest, as it faces the other way, but it is the same picture reversed in copying, no doubt with the cameralucida. There is no mistaking the extremely long, large nose, above the full compressed lips, denoting the forceful character which Pike displayed conspicuously throughout his career, whether in leading a handful of men through an unbroken wilderness, or in heading the columns which assaulted an intrenched foe. The same uniform coat, with its epaulets, its high standing, embroidered collar, unbuttoned across the breast and the flap turned down on one side,appears in all these likenesses. Such are inserted in some of the editions of Pike’s work; one of the reproductions forms the frontispiece of an early popular history of thewar, and is called "a striking likeness" on the title page.They are all doubtless traceable to the painting which has long hung and still hangs in the historical gallery of IndependenceHall at Philadelphia, alongside the portraits ofMeriwether Lewis, William Clark, and many other noblemen who loved and lived for their country. The painting which hangs in one of the rooms of the Minnesota HistoricalSociety at St. Paul is believed to be a copy of this,though it differs in the introduction of a spirit hand, extended from an invisible arm, holding a wreath over the head — an attempt at symbolism in which the unknown artist has not been very successful. This portrait is dimand much cracked. I am informed by Mr. William M.Maguire of Denver, that a prominent citizen of Colorado has recently executed a bronze bust of Pike, to be placed inManitou. Facsimiles of Pike’s signature are seldom seen in print; Lossing gives one with the portrait on p. 586 of his Field Book. I am not aware that any facsimile of a letter in Pike’s handwriting has hitherto been published.That one which is given in the present volume was selected from among many I have examined in the archives of theWar Department, both for its intrinsic historical interest,and for the unusually well-formed signature it bears — that of one who died, as he had lived, for his country — of one whose fame that country will never permit to perish.

PIKE’S EXPEDITIONS.


Part I.

THE MISSISSIPPI VOYAGE.


CHAPTER I.

ITINERARY: ST. LOUIS TO ST. PAUL, AUGUST 9TH-SEPTEMBER21ST, 1805.

Sailed from my encampment, near St. Louis, at 4p. m., on Friday, the 9th of August, 1805, with one sergeant,two corporals, and 17 privates, in a keel-boat 70 feet long, provisioned for four months. Water very rapid. Encampedon the east side of the river, at the head of an island.[I-1]

Aug. 10th. Embarked early; breakfasted opposite themouth of the Missouri, near Wood creek.[I-2] About 5 p. m.a storm came on from the westward; the boat lay-to. Having gone out to march with two men behind a cluster of islands, one of my soldiers swam a channel in the night, to inform me that the boat had stopped during the storm. I remained on the beach all night. Distance 28½ miles.[I-3]

Sunday, Aug. 11th. In the morning the boat came up andstopped opposite the Portage De Sioux.[I-4] We here spread out our baggage to dry; discharged our guns at a target,and scaled out our blunderbusses. Dined at the cave below the Illinois, at the mouth of which river we remained sometime. From the course of the Mississippi, the Illinois[I-5]might be mistaken for a part of it. Encamped on thelower point of an island,[I-6] about six miles above the Illinois;were much detained by passing the east side of some islands above the Illinois; and were obliged to get into the water and haul the boat through.

Aug. 12th. In the morning made several miles to breakfast;about 3 o’clock p. m. passed Buffaloe [Cuivre or Copperriver] or riviere au B — uf, about five miles above which commences a beautiful cedar cliff. Having passed this, the river expands to nearly two miles in width, and has four islands, whose lowest points are nearly parallel; these we called the Four Brothers. Encamped on the point of the east one. It rained very hard all night. Caught one catfish.Distance 29¾ miles.[I-7]

Aug. 13th. Late before we sailed; passed a vast number of islands; left one of our dogs on shore; were much detained by sand-bars, and obliged to haul our boat over severalof them; observed several [Indian] encampments which had been lately occupied. Rained all day. Distance 27 miles.[I-8]

Aug. 14th. Hard rain in the morning; but a fine wind springing up, we put off at half-past six o’clock. Passed ac amp of Sacs, consisting of three men with their families.They were employed in spearing and scaffolding a fish,[I-9]about three feet in length, with a long flat snout; they pointed out the channel, and prevented us from taking the wrong one. I gave them a small quantity of whisky and biscuit; and they, in return, presented me with some fish.Sailed on through a continuation of islands for nearly 20miles; met a young gentleman, Mr. Robedoux,[I-10] by whomI sent a letter to St. Louis; encamped on an island; caught 1,375 small fish. Rained all day. Distance 28 miles.[I-11]

Aug. 15th. Still raining in the morning. From the continued series of wet weather, the men were quite galledand sore. Met a Mr. Kettlet as of N. Y., who gave me a line to Mr. Fisher of the Prairie Des Chein [du Chien]. Passeda small [elsewhere named Bar] river to the W., with a sand-barat its entrance; also, passed Salt [elsewhere calledOahahah] river, which I do not recollect having seen on any chart; it is a considerable stream, and at high water is navigable for at least 200 miles. Left another dog. Distance 26 miles.[I-12]

Aug. 16th. Embarked early, but were so unfortunate as to get fast on a log; and did not extricate ourselves until past eleven o’clock, having to saw off a log under the water.At three o’clock arrived at the house of a Frenchman, situate on the W. side of the river, opposite Hurricane island.His cattle appeared to be in fine order, but his corn in abad state of cultivation. About one mile above his house,on the W. shore, is a very handsome hill, which he informed me was level on the top, with a gradual descent on either side, and a fountain of fine water. This man likewise told me that two men had been killed on the Big Bay, or ThreeBrothers; and desired to be informed what measures had been taken in consequence thereof. Caught three catfish and one perch. Encamped four miles above the house.Distance 18 miles.[I-13]

Aug. 17th. Embarked and came on remarkably well; at ten o’clock stopped for breakfast, and in order to arrange our sail; when the wind served, we put off and continued under easy sail all day. Passed three batteaux. Distance 39 miles.[I-14]

10-12

Sunday, Aug. 18th. Embarked early; about eleven o’clock passed an Indian camp, on the E. side. They firedseveral guns; but we passed without stopping. Very hardhead winds part of the day. Caught six fish. Distance 23 miles.[I-15]

Aug. 19th. Embarked early and made fine way; but at nine o’clock, in turning the point of a sand-bar, our boat struck a sawyer. At the moment, we did not know it had injured her; but, in a short time after, discovered her to be sinking; however, by thrusting oakum into the leak and bailing, we got her to shore on a bar, where, after entirely unloading, we with great difficulty keeled her sufficiently to cut out the plank and put in a new one. This at the timeI conceived to be a great misfortune; but upon examination we discovered that the injury resulting from it was greater than we were at first induced to believe; for upon inspection we found our provisions and clothing considerably damaged. The day was usefully and necessarily employed in assorting, sunning, and airing those articles.One of my hunters, Sparks, having gone on shore to hunt,swam the river about seven miles above and killed a deer;but finding we did not come, he returned down the river,and joined us by swimming. Whilst we were at work at our boat on the sand-beach, three canoes with Indianspassed on the opposite shore. They cried, "How-do-you-do — "wishing us to give them an invitation to come over;but receiving no answer they passed on. We then put our baggage on board and put off, designing to go where the young man had killed the deer; but after dark we became entangled among the sand-bars, and were obliged to stop and encamp on the point of a beach. Caught two fish.Distance 14 miles.[I-16]

Aug. 20th. Arrived at the foot of the rapids De Moyen[I-17]at seven o’clock. Although no soul on board had passed them, we commenced ascending them immediately. Our boat being large and moderately loaded, we found great difficulty.The river all the way through is from three-quarters to a mile wide. The rapids are 11 miles long, with successive ridges and shoals extending from shore to shore.The first has the greatest fall and is the most difficult to ascend. The channel, a bad one, is on the east side in passing the two first bars; then passes under the edge of the third; crosses to the west, and ascends on that side, all theway to the Sac village. The shoals continue the whole distance.We had passed the first and most difficult shoal,when we were met by Mr. Wm. Ewing,[I-18] who I understand is an agent appointed to reside with the Sacs to teach them the science of agriculture, with a French interpreter, four chiefs and 15 men of the Sac nation, in their canoes, bearing a flag of the United States. They came down to assist me up the rapids; took out 14 of my heaviest barrels, and put two of their men in the barge to pilot us up. Arrived at the house of Mr. Ewing, opposite the village, at dusk.The land on both sides of the rapids is hilly, but a rich soil.Distance 16 miles.[I-19]

Aug. 21st. All the chief men of the village came over to my encampment, where I spoke to them to the following purport:

"That their great father, the president of the UnitedStates, wishing to be more intimately acquainted with the situation, wants, &c., of the different nations of the red people, in our newly acquired territory of Louisiana, had ordered the general to send a number of his young warriors in different directions, to take them by the hand, and make such inquiries as might afford the satisfaction required.

"That I was authorized to choose situations for their trading establishments; and wished them to inform me if that place would be considered by them as central.

"That I was sorry to hear of the murder which had been committed on the river below; but, in consideration of their assurances that it was none of their nation, and the anxiety exhibited by them on the occasion, I had written to the general and informed him of what they had said on the subject.

"That in their treaty they engaged to apprehend all traders who came among them without license; for that time, I could not examine their traders on this subject; but that, on my return, I would make a particular examination.

"That if they thought proper they might send a young man in my boat, to inform the other villages of my mission," etc.

I then presented them with some tobacco, knives, and whisky. They replied to the following purport:

"That they thanked me for the good opinion I had of their nation, and for what I had written the general. That themselves, their young warriors, and the whole nation,were glad to see me among them.

"That as for the situation of the trading-houses, they could not determine, being but a part of the nation. With respect to sending a young man along, that if I would wait until to-morrow, they would choose one out. And finally,that they thanked me for my tobacco, knives, and whisky."

Not wishing to lose any time, after writing to the general[I-20] and my friends, I embarked and made six milesabove the village. Encamped on a sand-bar. One canoe of savages passed.

Aug. 22d. Embarked at 5 o’clock a. m. Hard headwinds. Passed a great number of islands. The river very wide and full of sand-bars. Distance 23 miles.[I-21]

Aug. 23d. Cool morning. Came on 5¼ miles, where,on the west shore, there is a very handsome situation fora garrison. The channel of the river passes under the hill,which is about 60 feet perpendicular, and level on the top;400 yards in the rear there is a small prairie of 8 or 10 acres,which would be a convenient spot for gardens; and on the east side of the river there is a beautiful prospect over a large prairie, as far as the eye can extend, now and then interrupted by groves of trees. Directly under the rock is a limestone spring, which, after an hour’s work, would afford water amply sufficient for the consumption of a regiment.The landing is bold and safe, and at the lower part of the hill a road may be made for a team in half an hour. Black and white oak timber in abundance. The mountain continues about two miles, and has five springs bursting from it in that distance.

Met four Indians and two squaws; landed with them;gave them one quart of made whisky [i. e., about three-fourths water], a few biscuit, and some salt. I requested some venison of them; they pretended they could not understand me; but after we had left them they held up two hams, and hallooed and laughed at us in derision.Passed nine horses on shore, and saw many signs of Indians.Passed a handsome prairie on the east side, and encamped at its head.[I-22]

Three batteaux from Michilimackinac stopped at our camp. We were told they were the property of Mr. MyersMichals. We were also informed that the largest Sac village was about 2½ miles out on the prairie; and that this prairie was called halfway from St. Louis to the prairie DesCheins.

Aug. 24th. In the morning passed a number of islands.Before dinner, Corporal Bradley and myself took our guns and went on shore; we got behind a savannah, by following a stream we conceived to have been a branch of the river,but which led us at least two leagues from it.[I-23] My two favorite dogs, having gone out with us, gave out in the prairie, owing to the heat, high grass, and want of water;but, thinking they would come on, we continued our march.We heard the report of a gun, and supposing it to be from our boat, answered it; shortly after, however, we passed anIndian trail, which appeared as if the persons had been hurried, I presume at the report of our guns; for with this people all strangers are enemies. Shortly after we struck the river, and the boat appeared in view; stayed some time for my dogs; two of my men volunteered to go in search of them. Encamped on the west shore, nearly opposite a chalk bank. My two men had not yet returned, and it wasextraordinary, as they knew my boat never waited for any person on shore. They endeavored to strike the Mississippi ahead of us. We fired a blunderbuss at three different times, to let them know where we lay. Distance 23½miles.[I-24]

Sunday, Aug. 25th. Stopped on the Sand-bank prairie on the E. side [about New Boston, Ill.], from which you have a beautiful prospect of at least 40 miles down the river,bearing S. 38° E. Discovered that our boat leaked very fast; but we secured her inside so completely with oakum and tallow as nearly to prevent the leak. Fired a blunderbuss every hour, all day, as signals for our men. Passed the river Iowa. Encamped at night on the prairie markedGrant’s prairie [below Muscatine, Ia.]. The men had not yet arrived. Distance 28 miles.[I-25]

Aug. 26th. Rain, with a very hard head wind. Towedour boat about nine miles, to where the river Hills join the Mississippi. Here I expected to find the two men Ihad lost, but was disappointed. The mercury in Reamur[Réaumur] at 13°; whereas yesterday it was 26° [= 61¼ and90½ Fahr.] Met two peroques [sic[I-26]] full of Indians, who commenced hollowing [hallooing] "How do you do — " etc.They then put to shore and beckoned us to do likewise,but we continued our course. This day very severe on the men. Distance 28½ miles.[I-27]

Aug. 27th. Embarked early; cold north wind; mercury 10°; the wind so hard ahead that we were obliged to tow the boat all day. Passed one peroque of Indians; also, theRiviere De Roche [Rock river], late in the day. SomeIndians, who were encamped there, embarked in their canoes and ascended the river before us. The wind was sovery strong that, although it was down the stream, they were near sinking. Encamped about four miles above theRiviere De Roche, on the W. shore. This day passed a pole on a prairie on which five dogs were hanging.Distance 22 miles.[I-28]

Aug. 28th. About an hour after we had embarked, wear rived at the camp of Mr. James Aird,[I-29] a Scotch gentlemanof Michilimackinac. He had encamped, with some goods, on the beach, and was repairing his boat, which had been injured in crossing [descending] the rapids of theRiviere De Roche, at the foot of which we now were. He had sent three boats back for the goods left behind. Breakfasted with him and obtained considerable information.Commenced ascending the rapids. Carried away our rudder in the first rapid; but after getting it repaired, the wind raised and we hoisted sail. Although entire strangers, we sailed through them with a perfect gale blowing all the time; had we struck a rock, in all probability we would have bilged and sunk. But we were so fortunate as to pass without touching. Met Mr. Aird’s boats, which had pilots,fast on the rocks. Those shoals are a continued chain of rocks, extending in some places from shore to shore, about 18 miles in length.[I-30] They afford more water than those ofDe Moyen, but are much more rapid.

Aug. 29th. Breakfasted at the Reynard village, abovethe rapids; this is the first village of the Reynards.[I-31] I expected to find my two men here, but was disappointed.Finding they had not passed, I lay by until four o’clock,the wind fair all the time. The chief informed me, by signs, that in four days they could march to Prairie DesCheins; and promised to furnish them with mockinsons[moccasins], and put them on their route. Set sail and made at least four knots an hour. I was disposed to sail all night; but the wind lulling, we encamped on the point of an island, on the W. shore. Distance 20 miles.[I-32]

Aug. 30th. Embarked at five o’clock; wind fair, butnot very high. Sailed all day. Passed four peroques ofIndians. Distance 43 miles.[I-33]

Aug. 31st. Embarked early. Passed one peroque ofIndians; also, two encampments, one on a beautiful eminence on the W. side of the river. This place had theappearance of an old town. Sailed almost all day.Distance 31½ miles.[I-34]

Sunday, Sept. 1st. Embarked early; wind fair; arrived at the lead mines [Dubuque, Ia.] at twelve o’clock. A dysentery, with which I had been afflicted several days,was suddenly checked this morning, which I believe to havebeen the occasion of a very violent attack of fever about eleven o’clock. Notwithstanding it was very severe, I dressed myself, with an intention to execute the orders of the general relative to this place. We were saluted with a field-piece, and received with every mark of attention byMonsieur [Julien] Dubuque, the proprietor. There wereno horses at the house, and it was six miles to where the mines were worked; it was therefore impossible to make a report by actual inspection. I therefore proposed 10 queries, on the answers to which my report was founded.[I-35]

Dined with Mr. D., who informed me that the Sioux andSauteurs[I-36] were as warmly engaged in opposition as ever;that not long since the former killed 15 Sauteurs, who on the 10th of August in return killed 10 Sioux, at the entrance of the St. Peters [Minnesota river]; and that a war-party, composed of Sacs, Reynards, and Puants [Winnebagoes[I-37]], of 200 warriors, had embarked on an expedition against theSauteurs; but that they had heard that the chief, having had an unfavorable dream, persuaded the party to return,and that I would meet them on my voyage. At this placeI was introduced to a chief called Raven, of the Reynards.He made a very flowery speech on the occasion, which I answered in a few words, accompanied by a small present.

I had now given up all hopes of my two men, and was about to embark when a peroque arrived, in which they were, with a Mr. Blondeau, and two Indians whom that gentleman had engaged above the rapids of Stony [Rock] river.The two soldiers had been six days without anything to eat except muscles [mussels], when they met Mr. James Aird,by whose humanity and attention their strength and spirits were in a measure restored; and they were enabled to reach the Reynard village, where they met Mr. B. The Indian chief furnished them with corn and shoes, and showed his friendship by every possible attention. I immediately discharged the hire of the Indians, and gave Mr. Blondeau a passage to the Prairie des Cheins. Left the lead mines at four o’clock. Distance 25 miles.[I-38]

Sept. 2d. After making two short reaches, we commenced one which is 30 miles in length; the wind serving,we just made it, and encamped on the E. side [near Cassville,Wis.], opposite the mouth of Turkey river. In the course of the day we landed to shoot pigeons. The moment a gun was fired, some Indians, who were on the shore above us,ran down and put off in their peroques with great precipitation;upon which Mr. Blondeau informed me that all the women and children were frightened at the very name of anAmerican boat, and that the men held us in great respect,conceiving us very quarrelsome, much for war, and also verybrave. This information I used as prudence suggested.We stopped at an encampment about three miles below the town, where they gave us some excellent plums. They dispatched a peroque to the village, to give notice, as I supposed,of our arrival. It commenced raining about dusk,and rained all night. Distance 40 miles.[I-39]

Sept. 3d. Embarked at a pretty early hour. Cloudy.Met two peroques of family Indians; they at first askedMr. Blondeau "if we were for war, or if going to war — " I now experienced the good effect of having some person onboard who could speak their language; for they presented me with three pair of ducks and a quantity of venison,sufficient for all our crew for one day; in return, I made them some trifling presents. Afterward met two peroques,carrying some of the warriors spoken of on the 2d inst.They kept at a great distance, until spoken to by Mr. B.,when they informed him that their party had proceeded up as high as Lake Pepin without effecting anything. It is surprising what a dread the Indians in this quarter have of the Americans. I have often seen them go round islands to avoid meeting my boat. It appears to me evident that the traders have taken great pains to impress upon the minds of the savages the idea of our being a very vindictive,ferocious, and warlike people. This impression was perhaps made with no good intention; but when they find that our conduct toward them is guided by magnanimity and justice,instead of operating in an injurious manner, it will have the effect to make them reverence at the same time they fear us. Distance 25 miles.[I-40]

Sept. 4th. Breakfasted just below the Ouiscousing [Wisconsin river[I-41]]. Arrived at the Prairie des Cheins about eleven o’clock; took quarters at Captain Fisher’s, and were politely received by him and Mr. Frazer.

Sept. 5th. Embarked about half-past ten o’clock in aSchenectady boat, to go to the mouth of the Ouiscousing,in order to take the latitude [which I found to be 43° 28´ 8´´N.], and look at the situation of the adjacent hills for a post. Was accompanied by Judge Fisher, Mr. Frazer, andMr. Woods. We ascended the hill[I-42] on the west side of theMississippi, and made choice of a spot which I thought most eligible, being level on the top, having a spring in the rear, and commanding a view of the country around. A shower of rain came on which completely wet us, and were turned to the village without having ascended the Ouiscousingas we intended. Marked four trees with A. B. C.D., and squared the sides of one in the center. Wrote to the general.

Sept. 6th. Had a small council with the Puants, and a chief of the lower band of the Sioux. Visited and laid out a position for a post, on a hill called the Petit Gris [Grès],[I-43]on the Ouiscousing, three miles above its mouth. Mr.Fisher, who accompanied me, was taken very sick, in consequence of drinking some water out of the Ouiscousing,The Puants never have any white interpreters, nor have theFols Avoin [Folle Avoine (Menominee)[I-44]] nation. In mycouncil I spoke to a Frenchman and he to a Sioux, who interpreted to some of the Puants.

Sept. 7th. My men beat all the villagers jumping and hopping. Began to load my new boats.

Sept. 8th. Embarked at half-past eleven o’clock in two batteaux. The wind fair and fresh. I found myself very much embarrassed and cramped in my new boats, with provision and baggage. I embarked two interpreters, one to perform the whole voyage, whose name was Pierre Rosseau[Rousseau[I-45]]; and the other named Joseph Reinulle [Reinville[I-46]],paid by Mr. Frazer to accompany me as high as the falls of St. Anthony. Mr. Frazer[I-47] is a young gentleman,clerk to Mr. Blakely of Montreal; he was born in Vermont,but has latterly resided in Canada. To the attention of this gentleman I am much indebted; he procured for me everythingin his power that I stood in need of, dispatched his bark canoes, and remained himself to go on with me. His design was to winter with some of the Sioux bands. We sailed well, came 18 miles, and encamped on the W. bank.[I-48]

I must not omit here to bear testimony to the politenessof all the principal inhabitants of the village. There is,however, a material distinction to be made in the nature of those attentions: The kindness of Messrs. Fisher, Frazer,and Woods, all Americans, seemed to be the spontaneouse fusions of good will, and partiality to their countrymen;it extended to the accommodation, convenience, exercises,and pastimes of my men; and whenever they proved superior to the French, openly showed their pleasure. But theFrench Canadians appeared attentive rather from their natural good manners than sincere friendship; however, it produced from them the same effect that natural good will did in the others.

Sept. 9th. Embarked early. Dined at Cape Garlic, or atGarlic river; after which we came on to an island on the E.side, about five miles below the river [Upper] Iowa, and encamped.Rained before sunset. Distance 28 miles.[I-49]

Sept. 10th. Rain still continuing, we remained at our camp. Having shot at some pigeons, the report was heard at the Sioux lodges, the same to whom I spoke on the 6 that the Prairie [du Chien]; when La Fieulle [Feuille[I-50]] sentdown six of his young men to inform me "that he had waited three days with meat, etc., but that last night they had began to drink, and that on the next day he would receive me with his people sober." I returned him for answer "that the season was advanced, time was pressing,and if the rain ceased I must go on." Mr. Frazer and the interpreter went home with the Indians. We embarked about one o’clock.[I-51] Frazer, returning, informedme that the chief acquiesced in my reasons for pressing forward, but that he had prepared a pipe (by way of letter)to present me, to show to all the Sioux above, with a message to inform them that I was a chief of their new fathers, and that he wished me to be treated with friend ship and respect.

On our arrival opposite the lodges, the men were paraded on the bank, with their guns in their hands. They saluted us with ball with what might be termed three rounds;which I returned with three rounds from each boat with my blunderbusses. This salute, although nothing to soldiersaccustomed to fire, would not be so agreeable to many people; as the Indians had all been drinking, and as some of them even tried their dexterity, to see how near the boat they could strike. They may, indeed, be said to have struck on every side of us. When landed, I had my pistols in my belt and sword in hand. I was met on the bank by the chief, and invited to his lodge. As soon as my guards were formed and sentinels posted, I accompanied him. Some of my men who were going up with me I caused to leave their arms behind, as a mark of confidence. At the chief’slodge I found a clean mat and pillow for me to sit on, and the before-mentioned pipe on a pair of small crutches before me. The chief sat on my right hand, my interpreter andMr. Frazer on my left. After smoking, the chief spoke to the following purport:

"That, notwithstanding he had seen me at the Prairie[du Chien], he was happy to take me by the hand among is own people, and there show his young men the respect due to their new father [President Jefferson]. That, when at St. Louis in the spring, his father [General Wilkinson]had told him that if he looked down the river he would see one of his young warriors [Pike] coming up. He now found it true, and he was happy to see me, who knew the GreatSpirit was the father of all, both the white and the red people; and if one died, the other could not live long.That he had never been at war with their new father, and hoped always to preserve the same understanding that now existed. That he now presented me with a pipe, to show to the upper bands as a token of our good understanding, and that they might see his work and imitate his conduct.That he had gone to St. Louis on a shameful visit, to carry a murderer; but that we had given the man his life, and he thanked us for it. That he had provided something to eat, but he supposed I could not eat it; and if not, to give it to my young men."

I replied: "That, although I had told him at the Prairie my business up the Mississippi, I would again relate it tohim." I then mentioned the different objects I had in view with regard to the savages who had fallen under our protection by our late purchase from the Spaniards; the different posts to be established; the objects of these posts as related to them; supplying them with necessaries; having officer sand agents of government near them to attend to their business;and above all to endeavor to make peace between the Sioux and Sauteurs. "That it was possible on my return I should bring some of the Sauteurs down with me,and take with me some of the Sioux chiefs to St. Louis,there to settle the long and bloody war which had existed between the two nations. That I accepted his pipe with pleasure, as the gift of a great man, the chief of four bands,and a brother; that it should be used as he desired." I then eat of the dinner he had provided, which was very grateful. It was wild rye [rice — ] and venison, of which I sent four bowls to my men.

I afterward went to a dance, the performance of which was attended with many curious maneuvers. Men and women danced indiscriminately. They were all dressed in the gayest manner; each had in the hand a small skin of some description, and would frequently run up, point their skin, and give a puff with their breath; when the person blown at, whether man or woman, would fall, and appear to be almost lifeless, or in great agony; but would recover slowly, rise, and join in the dance. This they called their great medicine; or, as I understood the word, dance of religion,the Indians believing that they actually puffed something into each others’ bodies which occasioned the falling, etc.It is not every person who is admitted; persons wishing to join them must first make valuable presents to the society to the amount of $40 or $50, give a feast, and then be admitted with great ceremony. Mr. Frazer informed me that he was once in the lodge with some young men who did not belong to the club; when one of the dancers came in they immediately threw their blankets over him, and forced him out of the lodge; he laughed, but the young Indianscalled him a fool, and said "he did not know what thedancer might blow into his body."

I returned to my boat; sent for the chief and presented him with two carrots of tobacco, four knives, half a pound of vermilion, and one quart of salt. Mr. Frazer asked liberty to present them some rum; we made them up a keg between us, of eight gallons — two gallons of whisky [the rest water]. Mr. Frazer informed the chief that he dare not give them any without my permission. The chief thanked me for all my presents, and said "they must come free, as he did not ask for them." I replied that "to those who did not ask for anything, I gave freely; but to those who asked for much, I gave only a little or none."

We embarked about half-past three o’clock; came three miles, and encamped on the W. side.[I-52] Mr. Frazer we left behind, but he came up with his two peroques about dusk.It commenced raining very hard. In the night a peroque arrived from the lodges at his camp. During our stay at their camp, there were soldiers appointed to keep the crowd from my boats, who executed their duty with vigilance and rigor, driving men, women, and children back, when ever they came near my boats. At my departure, their soldiers said, "As I had shaken hands with their chief, they must shake hands with my soldiers." In which request I willingly indulged them.

Sept. 11th. Embarked at seven o’clock, although raining.Mr. Frazer’s canoes also came on until nine o’clock.Stopped for breakfast and made a fire. Mr. Frazer stayed with me; finding his peroques not quite able to keep up, he dispatched them. We embarked; came on until near six o’clock, and encamped on the W. side. Saw nothing of his peroques after they left us. Supposed to have come 16 miles this day.[I-53] Rain and cold winds, all day ahead. The river has never been clear of islands since I left Prairie DesChein. I absolutely believe it to be here two miles wide.Hills, or rather prairie knobs, on both sides.

Sept. 12th. It raining very hard in the morning, we did not embark until ten o’clock, Mr. Frazer’s peroques then coming up. It was still raining, and was very cold; passed the Racine[I-54] river; also a prairie called Le Cross [La Crosse],from a game of ball played frequently on it by the SiouxIndians. This prairie is very handsome; it has a small square hill, similar to some mentioned by Carver. It is bounded in the rear by hills similar to [those of] the PrairieDes Chein.

On this prairie Mr. Frazer showed me some holes dug by the Sioux, when in expectation of an attack, into which they first put their women and children, and then crawl themselves. They were generally round and about 10 feet in diameter; but some were half-moons and quite a breastwork.This I understood was the chief work, which was the principal redoubt. Their modes of constructing the mare: the moment they apprehend or discover an enemy on the prairie, they commence digging with their knives,tomahawks, and a wooden ladle; and in an incredibly short space of time they have a hole sufficiently deep to cover themselves and their families from the balls or arrows of the enemy. They [enemies] have no idea of taking those subterraneous redoubts by storm, as they would probably lose a great number of men in the attack; and although theymight be successful in the event, it would be considered a very imprudent action.

Mr. Frazer, finding his canoes not able to keep up, stayed at this prairie to organize one of them, intending then to overtake us. Came on three miles further.[I-55]

Sept. 13th. Embarked at six o’clock. Came on to as and-bar, and stopped to dry my things. At this place Mr.Frazer overtook me. We remained here three hours; came on to the foot of the hills, at le Montaigne qui Trompe al’Eau [sic], which is a hill situated on the river. Rain all day, except about two hours at noon. Passed Black river.Distance 21 miles.[I-56]

Sept. 14th. Embarked early; the fog so thick we could not distinguish objects 20 yards. When we breakfasted we saw nothing of Mr. Frazer’s canoes. After breakfast, at the head of an island, met Frazer’s boats. Wind coming on fair, we hoisted sail, and found that we were more on an equality with our sails than our oars. The birch canoes sailed very well, but we were able to out row them. Met the remainder of the war-party of the Sacs and Reynards before noted, returning from their expedition against theSauteurs. I directed my interpreter to ask "How manyscalps they had taken — " They replied, "None." Headed, "They were all squaws"; for which I reprimanded him. Passed the mountain which stands in the river; or, as the French term it, which soaks in the river. Came to thePrairie Le Aisle [sic[I-57]], on the west.

Mr. Frazer, Bradley, Sparks, and myself, went out to hunt. We crossed first a dry flat prairie; when we arrivedat the hills we ascended them, from which we had a mostsublime and beautiful prospect. On the right, we saw the mountains which we passed in the morning and the prairie in their rear; like distant clouds, the mountains at thePrairie Le Cross; on our left and under our feet, the valley between the two barren hills through which the Mississippi wound itself by numerous channels, forming many beautiful islands, as far as the eye could embrace the scene; and our four boats under full sail, their flags streaming before the wind. It was altogether a prospect so variegated and romantic that a man may scarcely expect to enjoy such a one but twice or thrice in the course of his life. I proposed keeping the hills until they led to the river, encamping and waiting the next day for our boats; but Mr.Frazer’s anxiety to get to the boats induced me to yield.After crossing a very thick bottom, fording and swimming three branches of the river, and crossing several morasses,we at twelve o’clock arrived opposite our boats, which were encamped on the east side. We were brought over. Saw great sign of elk, but had not the good fortune to come across any of them. My men saw three on the shore.Distance 21 miles.[I-58]

Sunday, Sept. 15th. Embarked early. Passed the riviereEmbarrass [Zumbro river], and Lean Clare [i. e., l’EauClaire; Clear, White Water, or Minneiska river], on the W.,which is navigable 135 miles. Encamped opposite the riverLe B — uf [Beef or Buffalo river], on the W. shore.[I-59] At thehead of this river the Chipeways inhabit, and it is navigable for peroques 40 or 50 leagues. Rained in the afternoon.Mr. Frazer broke one of his canoes. Came about three miles further than him. Distance 25 miles.

Sept. 16th. Embarked late, as I wished Mr. Frazer to overtake me, but came on very well. His canoes overtook us at dinner, at the grand encampment [7½ miles[I-60]] belowLake Pepin. We made the sandy peninsula on the east at the entrance of Lake Pepin, by dusk; passed the Sauteaux[Chippewa[I-61]] river on the east, at the entrance of the lake.After supper, the wind being fair, we put off with the intention to sail across; my interpreter, Rosseau, telling me that he had passed the lake twenty times, but never once in the day; giving as a reason that the wind frequently rose and detained them by day in the lake. But I believe the traders’ true reason generally is their fears of the Sauteurs,as these have made several strokes of war at the mouth of this river, never distinguishing between the Sioux and their traders. However, the wind serving, I was induced to goon; and accordingly we sailed, my boat bringing up the rear, for I had put the sail of my big boat on my batteau,and a mast of 22 feet. Mr. Frazer embarked on my boat.At first the breeze was very gentle, and we sailed with our violins and other music playing; but the sky afterward became cloudy and quite a gale arose. My boat plowed the swells, sometimes almost bow under. When we came to the Traverse [crossing-place], which is opposite Point DeSable [Sandy point], we thought it most advisable, the lake being very much disturbed and the gale increasing, to takeharbor in a bay on the east. One of the canoes and my boat came in very well together; but having made a fire on the point to give notice to our boats in the rear, they both ran on the bar before they doubled it, and were near foundering; but by jumping into the lake we brought them into a safe harbor. Distance 40 miles.[I-62]

Sept. 17th. Although there was every appearance of a very severe storm, we embarked at half-past six o’clock, the wind fair; but before we had hoisted all sail, those in front had struck theirs. The wind came on hard ahead. Thesky became inflamed, and the lightning seemed to roll down the sides of the hills which bordered the shore of the lake.The storm in all its grandeur, majesty, and horror burstupon us in the Traverse, while making for Point De Sable;and it required no moderate exertion to weather the point and get to the windward side of it. Distance three miles.[I-63]

There we found Mr. Cameron,[I-64] who had sailed from the prairie [Prairie du Chien] on the 5th; he had three bark canoes and a wooden one with him. He had been lying here two days, his canoes unloaded and turned up for the habitation of his men, his tents pitched, and himself living in all the ease of an Indian trader. He appeared to be a man of tolerable information, but rather indolent in his habits; a Scotchman by birth, but an Englishman by prejudice.He had with him a very handsome young man, by the name of John Rudsdell, and also his own son, a lad of fifteen.

The storm continuing, we remained all day. I was shown a point of rocks [Maiden Rock, 400 feet high[I-65]]from which a Sioux maiden cast herself, and was dashed into a thousand pieces on the rocks below. She had been informed that her friends intended matching her to a man she despised; having been refused the man she had chosen,she ascended the hill, singing her death-song; and before they could overtake her and obviate her purpose she took the lover’s leap! Thus ended her troubles with her life.A wonderful display of sentiment in a savage!

Sept. 18th. Embarked after breakfast. Mr. Cameron,with his boats, came on with me. Crossed the lake, sounded it, and took an observation at the upper end. I embarked in one of his canoes, and we came up to Canoe river,[I-66] wherethere was a small band of Sioux under the command ofRed Wing, the second war chief in the nation. He made me a speech and presented a pipe, pouch, and buffalo skin.He appeared to be a man of sense, and promised to accompanyme to St. Peters [the Minnesota river]; he saluted me,and had it returned. I made him a small present.[I-67]

We encamped on the end of the island, and although it was not more than eleven o’clock, were obliged to stay all night. Distance 18 miles.[I-68]

Sept. 19th. Embarked early; dined at St. Croix[I-69] river.Messrs. Frazer and Cameron having some business to dowith the savages, we left them at the encampment; but theypromised to overtake me, though they should be obliged to travel until twelve o’clock at night. Fired a blunderbuss for them at Tattoo. The chain of my watch became unhooked,by lending her to my guard; this was a very serious misfortune.[I-70]

Sept. 20th. Embarked after sunrise. Cloudy, with hard head winds; a small shower of rain; cleared up in the afternoon,and became pleasant. Encamped on a prairie on the east side, on which is a large painted stone, about eight miles below the Sioux village. The traders had not yet overtaken me. Distance 26½ miles.[I-71]

Sept. 21st. Embarked at a seasonable hour; breakfasted at the Sioux village on the east side [near St. Paul,[I-72] capital ofMinnesota]. It consists of 11 lodges, and is situated at the head of an island just below a ledge of rocks [Dayton bluff,in the city]. The village was evacuated at this time, all theIndians having gone out to the lands to gather fols avoin[folle avoine, wild rice: see note44, page 39]. About two miles above, saw three bears swimming over the river, but at too great a distance for us to have killed them; they made the shore before I could come up with them. Passed a camp of Sioux, of four lodges, in which I saw only one man, whose name was Black Soldier. The garrulity of the women astonished me, for at the other camps they never opened their lips; but here they flocked around us with all their tongues going at the same time. The cause of this freedom must have been the absence of their lords and masters. Passed the encampment of Mr. Ferrebault [Faribault[I-73]],who had broken his peroque and had encamped on the west side of the river, about three miles below St.Peters [under the bluff below Mendota]. We made our encampment on the N. E. point of the big [Pike’s] island opposite [Fort Snelling or] St. Peters.[I-74] Distance 24 miles.

The Mississippi became so very narrow this day, that I once crossed in my batteaux with forty strokes of my oars.The water of the Mississippi, since we passed Lake Pepin,has been remarkably red; and where it is deep, appears asblack as ink. The waters of the St. Croix and St. Peters appear blue and clear, for a considerable distance below their confluence.

I observed a white flag on shore to-day, and on landing,discovered it to be white silk; it was suspended over a scaffold, on which were laid four dead bodies, two inclosed in boards, and two in bark. They were wrapped up in blankets, which appeared to be quite new. They were thebodies, I was informed, of two Sioux women who had lived with two Frenchmen, one of their children, and some other relative; two of whom died at St. Peters and two at St.Croix, but were brought here to be deposited upon thisscaffold together. This is the manner of Sioux burial when persons die a natural death; but when they are killed they suffer them to lie unburied. This circumstance brought to my recollection the bones of a man I found on the hills below the St. Croix; the jaw bone I brought on board. He must have been killed on that spot.

CHAPTER II.

ITINERARY, CONTINUED: ST. PAUL TO LEECH LAKE, SEPTEMBER22D, 1805-JANUARY 31ST, 1806.

Sunday, Sept. 22d. Employed in the morning measuring the river. About three o’clock Mr. Frazer and his peroques arrived; and in three hours after PetitCorbeau, at the head of his band, arrived with 150 warriors.

They ascended the hill in the point between the Mississippi and St. Peters, and gave us a salute, a la mode savage,with balls; after which we settled affairs for the council next day. Mr. Frazer and myself took a bark canoe, and went up to the village, in order to see Mr. Cameron. We ascended the St. Peters to the village, and found his camp.He engaged to be at the council the next day, and promised to let me have his barge. The Sioux had marched on a war excursion; but, hearing by express of my arrival, they returned by land. We were treated very hospitably, and hallooed after to go into every lodge to eat. Returned to our camp about eleven o’clock, and found the Sioux and my men peaceably encamped. No current in the river.[II-1]

Sept. 23d. Prepared for the council, which we commenced about twelve o’clock. I had a bower or shade, made of my sails, on the beach, into which only my gentlemen(the traders) and the chiefs entered. I then addressed them in a speech, which, though long and touching on many points, had for its principal object the granting of land at this place, falls of St. Anthony, and St. Croix [river], and making peace with the Chipeways. I was replied to by LeFils de Pinchow, Le Petit Corbeau, and l’Original Leve.They gave me the land required, about 100,000 acres, equal to $200,000, and promised me a safe passport for myself and any [Chippewa] chiefs I might bring down; but spoke doubtfully with respect to the peace. I gave them presents to the amount of about $200, and as soon as the council wasover, I allowed the traders to present them with some liquor, which, with what I myself gave, was equal to 60 gallons. In one half-hour they were all embarked for their respective villages.

The chiefs in the council were: Le Petit Corbeau, who signed the grant; Le Fils de Pinchow, who also signed;Le Grand Partisan; Le Original Leve, war-chief; gave him my father’s [General Wilkinson’s] tomahawk, etc.; Le DemiDouzen, war-chief; Le Beccasse; Le B — uf que Marche.

It was somewhat difficult to get them to sign the grant, as they conceived their word of honor should be taken for the grant without any mark; but I convinced then it was not on their account, but my own, that I wished them to sign it.[II-2]

Sept. 24th. In the morning I discovered that my flag was missing from my boat. Being in doubt whether it had been stolen by the Indians, or had fallen overboard and floated away, I sent for my friend, Original Leve, and sufficiently evinced to him, by the vehemence of my action,by the immediate punishment of my guard (having inflicted on one of them corporeal punishment), and by sending down the shore three miles in search of it, how much I was displeased that such a thing should have occurred. I sent a flag and two carrots of tobacco, by Mr. Cameron, to theSioux at the head of the St. Peters; made a small draft of the position at this place; sent up the boat I got from Mr.Fisher to the village on the St. Peters, and exchanged her for a barge with Mr. Duncan. My men returned with the barge about sundown. She was a fine light thing; eight men were able to carry her. Employed all day in writing.

Sept. 25th. I was awakened out of my bed by Le PetitCorbeau, head chief, who came up from his village to see if we were all killed, or if any accident had happened to us.This was in consequence of their having found my flagfloating three miles below their village, 15 miles hence, from which they concluded some affray had taken place, and that it had been thrown overboard. Although I considered this an unfortunate accident for me, I was exceedingly happy at its effect; for it was the occasion of preventing much bloodshed among the savages. A chief called OutardBlanche[II-3] had his lip cut off, and had come to PetitCorbeau and told him, "that his face was his looking-glass,that it was spoiled, and that he was determined on revenge."The parties were charging their guns and preparing for action, when lo! the flag appeared like a messenger of peace sent to prevent their bloody purposes. They were all astonished to see it. The staff was broken. Then PetitCorbeau arose and spoke to this effect: "That a thing so sacred had not been taken from my boat without violence;that it would be proper for them to hush all private animosities,until they had revenged the cause of their eldest brother; that he would immediately go up to St. Peters, to know what dogs had done that thing, in order to take steps to get satisfaction of those who had done the mischief."They all listened to this reasoning; he immediately had the flag put out to dry, and embarked for my camp. I was much concerned to hear of the blood likely to have beenshed, and gave him five yards of blue stroud, three yards of calico, one handkerchief, one carrot of tobacco, and one knife, in order to make peace among his people. He promised to send my flag by land to the falls, and make peace with Outard Blanche. Mr. Frazer went up to the village. We embarked late, and encamped at the foot of the rapids. In many places, I could scarce [almost] throw a stone over the river. Distance three miles.[II-4]

Sept. 26th. Embarked at the usual hour, and after much labor in passing through the rapids, arrived at the foot of the falls [of St. Anthony, in the city of Minneapolis], about three or four o’clock; unloaded my boat, and had the principal part of her cargo carried over the portage. With the other boat, however, full loaded, they were not able to get over the last shoot, and encamped about 600 yards below. I pitched my tent and encamped above the shoot. The rapids mentioned in this day’s march might properly be called a continuation of the falls of St. Anthony, for they are equally entitled to this appellation with the falls of the Delaware and Susquehanna. Killed one deer. Distance nine miles.[II-5]

Sept. 27th. Brought over the residue of my lading this morning. Two men arrived from Mr. Frazer, on St. Peters,for my dispatches. This business of closing and sealing appeared like a last adieu to the civilized world. Sent a large packet to the general, and a letter to Mrs. Pike, with a short note to Mr. Frazer. Two young Indians brought my flag across by land; they arrived yesterday, just as we came in sight of the falls. I made them a present for their punctualityand expedition, and the danger they were exposed to from the journey. Carried our boats out of the river as far as the bottom of the hill.

Sept. 28th. Brought my barge over, and put her in the river above the falls. While we were engaged with her,three-quarters of a mile from camp, seven Indians, painted black, appeared on the heights. We had left our guns at camp, and were entirely defenseless. It occurred to methat they were the small party of Sioux who were obstinate,and would go to war when the other part of the bands came in. These they proved to be. They were better armed than any I had ever seen, having guns, bows, arrows,clubs, spears, and some of them even a case of pistols.I was at that time giving my men a dram, and giving the cup of liquor to the first, he drank it off; but I was more cautious with the remainder. I sent my interpreter to camp with them to wait my coming, wishing to purchase one of their war-clubs, which was made of elk-horn, and decorated with inlaid work. This, and a set of bows and arrows, I wished to get as a curiosity. But the liquor I had given him beginning to operate, he came back for me; refusing to go till I brought my boat, he returned, and (I suppose being offended) borrowed a canoe and crossed the river. In the afternoon we got the other boat near the top of the hill,when the props gave way, and she slid all the way down to the bottom, but fortunately without injuring any person.It raining very hard, we left her. Killed one goose and a raccoon.

Sunday, Sept. 29th. I killed a remarkably large raccoon.Got our large boat over the portage, and put her in the river, at the upper landing. This night the men gave sufficient proof of their fatigue, by all throwing themselves down to sleep, preferring rest to supper. This day I had but 15 men out of 22; the others were sick.

This voyage could have been performed with great convenience if we had taken our departure in June. But the proper time would be to leave the Illinois as soon as the ice would permit, when the river would be of a good height.

Sept. 30th. Loaded my boat, moved over, and encamped on the island. The large boats loading likewise, we went over and put on board. In the meantime I took a survey of the Falls, Portage, etc. If it be possible to pass the fall sat high water, of which I am doubtful, it must be on the east side, about 30 yards from shore, as there are three layers of rocks, one below the other. The pitch off eitheris not more than five feet; but of this I can say more on my return. (It is never possible, as ascertained on my return.)

Oct. 1st. Embarked late. The river at first appeared mild and sufficiently deep; but after about four miles the shoals commenced, and we had very hard water all day;passed three rapids. Killed one goose and two ducks.This day the sun shone after I had left the falls; but whilst there it was always cloudy. Distance 17 miles.[II-6]

Oct. 2d. Embarked at our usual hour, and shortly after passed some large islands and remarkably hard ripples.Indeed the navigation, to persons not determined to proceed,would have been deemed impracticable. We waded nearly all day, to force the boats off shoals, and draw them through rapids. Killed three geese and two swans. Much appearance of elk and deer. Distance 12 miles.[II-7]

Oct. 3d. Cold in the morning. Mercury at zero. Came on very well; some ripples and shoals. Killed three geese andone raccoon [Procyon lotor]; also a brelaw,[II-8] an animal I had never before seen. Distance 15½ miles.[II-9]

Oct. 4th. Rained in the morning; but the wind serving,we embarked, although it was extremely raw and cold.Opposite the mouth of Crow river [present name] we found a bark canoe cut to pieces with tomahawks, and the paddles broken on shore; a short distance higher up we saw five more, and continued to see the wrecks until we found eight. From the form of the canoes my interpreter pronounced them to be Sioux; and some broken arrows to be the Sauteurs. The paddles were also marked with theIndian sign of men and women killed. From all these circumstances we drew this inference, that the canoes had been the vessels of a party of Sioux who had been attacked and all killed or taken by the Sauteurs. Time may develop thistransaction. My interpreter was much alarmed, assuring me that it was probable that at our first re encounter with the Chipeways they would take us for Sioux traders, and fire on us before we could come to an explanation; that they had murdered three Frenchmen whom they found on the shore about this time last spring; but notwithstanding his information,I was on shore all the afternoon in pursuit of elk. Caught a curious little animal on the prairie, which my Frenchman[Rousseau] termed a prairie mole,[II-10] but it is very different from the mole of the States. Killed two geese, one pheasant[ruffed grouse, Bonasa umbellus], and a wolf. Distance 16 miles.[II-11]

Oct. 5th. Hard water and ripples all day. Passed several old Sioux encampments, all fortified. Found five litters in which sick or wounded had been carried. At this place a hard battle was fought between the Sioux and Sauteurs in the year 1800. Killed one goose. Distance 11 miles.[II-12]

Sunday, Oct. 6th. Early in the morning discovered four elk; they swam the river. I pursued them, and wounded one, which made his escape into a marsh; saw two droves of elk. I killed some small game and joined the boats near night. Found a small red capot hung upon a tree; this my interpreter informed me was a sacrifice by some Indians to the bon Dieu. I determined to lie by and hunt next day.Killed three prairie-hens [pinnated grouse, Tympanuchusamericanus] and two pheasants. This day saw the first elk.Distance 12 miles.[II-13]

Oct. 7th. Lay by in order to dry my corn, clothing, etc.,and to have an investigation into the conduct of my sergeant[Kennerman], against whom some charges were exhibited. Sent several of my men out hunting. I went toward evening and killed some prairie-hens; the hunter were unsuccessful. Killed three prairie-hens and six pheasants.

Oct. 8th. Embarked early and made a very good day’smarch; had but three rapids to pass all day. Some oakwood land on the W. side, but the whole bottom covered with prickly-ash. I made it a practice to oblige every man to march who complained of indisposition, by which meansI had some flankers on both sides of the river, who were excellent guards against surprises; they also served as hunters. We had but one raccoon killed by all. Distance 20 miles.[II-14]

Oct. 9th. Embarked early; wind ahead; barrens and prairie. Killed one deer and four pheasants. Distance 3 miles. [Camp between Plum creek and St. Augusta.]

Oct. 10th. Came to large islands and strong water early in the morning. Passed the place at which Mr. [Joseph]Reinville and Mons. Perlier [ — ] wintered in 1797. Passeda cluster of more than 20 islands in the course of four miles; these I called Beaver islands, from the immense sign of those animals; for they have dams on every island and roads from them every two or three rods. I would hereattempt a description of this wonderful animal, and its admirable system of architecture, were not the subject already exhausted by the numerous travelers who have written on this subject. Encamped at the foot of theGrand [Sauk] Rapids. Killed two geese, five ducks, and four pheasants. Distance 16½ miles.[II-15]

Oct. 11th. Both boats passed the worst of the rapids by eleven o’clock, but we were obliged to wade and lift the mover rocks where there was not a foot of water, when at times the next step would be in water over our heads. In consequence of this our boats were frequently in imminent danger of being bilged on the rocks. About five miles above the rapids our large boat was discovered to leak so fast as to render it necessary to unload her, which we did. Stopped the leak and reloaded. Near a war-encampment I found a painted buckskin and a piece of scarlet cloth, suspended by the limb of a tree; this I supposed to be a sacrifice toMatcho Maniton [sic], to render their enterprise successful;but I took the liberty of invading the rights of his diabolical majesty, by treating them as the priests of old have often done — that is, converting the sacrifice to my own use.Killed only two ducks. Distance 8 miles.[II-16]

Oct. 12th. Hard ripples in the morning. Passed a narrow rocky place [Watab rapids], after which we had good water. Our large boat again sprung a leak, and we were again obliged to encamp early and unload. Killed one deer,one wolf, two geese, and two ducks. Distance 12½ miles.[II-17]

Sunday, Oct. 13th. Embarked early and came on well.Passed [first a river on the right, which we named Lake river (now called Little Rock river) and then] a handsome little river on the east, which we named Clear river [nowPlatte]; water good. Killed one deer, one beaver, two minks, two geese, and one duck. Fair winds. Discovered one buffalo sign. Distance 29 miles.[II-18]

Oct. 14th. Ripples a considerable [part of the] way. My hunters killed three deer, four geese, and two porcupines.When hunting discovered a trail which I supposed to have been made by the savages. I followed it with much precaution,and at length started a large bear feeding on thecarcass of a deer; he soon made his escape. Yesterday we came to the first timbered land above the falls. Made the first discovery of bear since we left St. Louis, excepting what we saw three miles below St. Peters. Distance 17 miles.[II-19]

Oct. 15th. Ripples all day. In the morning the large boat came up, and I once more got my party together; they had been detained by taking in the game. Yesterday and this day passed some skirts of good land, well timbered,swamps of hemlock, and white pine. Water very hard. The river became shallow and full of islands. We encamped on a beautiful point on the west, below a fall [Fourth, Knife, orPike rapids] of the river over a bed of rocks, through which we had two narrow shoots to make our way the next day.Killed two deer, five ducks, and two geese. This day’s march made me think seriously of our wintering ground and leaving our large boats. Distance five miles.[II-20]

Oct. 16th. When we arose in the morning found thats now had fallen during the night; the ground was covered,and it continued to snow. This indeed was but poor encouragement for attacking the rapids, in which we were certain to wade to our necks. I was determined, however, if possible,to make la riviere de Corbeau [now Crow Wing river], the highest point ever made by traders in their bark canoes.We embarked, and after four hours’ work became sobenumbed with cold that our limbs were perfectly useless.We put to shore on the opposite side of the river, about two-thirds of the way up the rapids. Built a large fire; and then discovered that our boats were nearly half-full of water, both having sprung such large leaks as to oblige me to keep three hands bailing. My Sergeant Kennerman, one of the stoutest men I ever knew, broke a blood-vessel and vomited nearly two quarts of blood. One of my corporals, Bradley, also evacuated nearly a pint of blood when he attempted to void his urine. These unhappy circumstances, in addition to the inability of four other men, whom we were obliged to leave on shore, convinced me that if I had no regard for my own health and constitution, I should have some for those poor fellows, who were killing themselves to obey my orders.After we had breakfasted and refreshed ourselves, we went down to our boats on the rocks, where I was obliged to leave them. I then informed my men that we would return to the camp, and there leave some of the party and our large boats. This information was pleasing, and the attempt to reach the camp soon accomplished.

My reasons for this step have partly been already stated.The necessity of unloading and refitting my boats, the beauty and convenience of the spot for building huts, the fine pine trees for peroques, and the quantity of game, were additional inducements. We immediately unloaded our boats and secured their cargoes. In the evening I went out upon a small but beautiful creek [i. e., Pine creek of Pike,now Swan river[II-21]] which empties into the falls [on the W.side], for the purpose of selecting pine trees to make canoes.Saw five deer, and killed one buck weighing 137 pounds.By my leaving men at this place, and from the great quantities of game in its vicinity, I was insured plenty of provision for my return voyage. In the party [to be] left behind was one hunter, to be continually employed, who would keep our stock of salt provisions good. Distance 233½[about 111] miles above the falls of St. Anthony.

Oct. 17th. It continued to snow. I walked out in the morning and killed four bears, and my hunter three deers.Felled our trees for canoes and commenced working on them.

Oct. 18th. Stopped hunting and put every hand to work.Cut 60 logs for huts and worked at the canoes. This, considering we had only two felling-axes and three hatchets,was pretty good work. Cloudy, with little snow.

Oct. 19th. Raised one of our houses and almost completed one canoe. I was employed the principal part of this day in writing letters and making arrangements whichI deemed necessary, in case I should never return.

Sunday, Oct. 20th. Continued our labor at the houses and canoes; finished my letters, etc. At night discovered the prairie on the opposite side of the river to be on fire:supposed to have been made by the Sauteurs. I wished much to have our situation respectable [defensible] here, orI would have sent next day to discover them.

Oct. 21st. Went out hunting, but killed nothing, not wishing to shoot at small game. Our labor went on.

Oct. 22d. Went out hunting. About 15 miles up the[Pine] creek saw a great quantity of deer; but from the dryness of the woods and the quantity of brush, only shot one through the body, which made its escape. This day my men neglected their work, which convinced me I must leave off hunting and superintend them. Miller and myself lay out all night in the pine woods.

Oct. 23d. Raised another blockhouse; deposited all our property in the one already completed. Killed a number of pheasants and ducks, while visiting my canoe-makers.Sleet and snow.

Oct. 24th. The snow having fallen one or two inches thick in the night, I sent out one hunter, Sparks, and went out myself; Bradley, my other hunter, being sick. Each of us killed two deer, one goose, and one pheasant.

Oct. 25th. Sent out men with Sparks to bring in his game. None of them returned, and I supposed them to be lost in the hemlock swamps with which the country abounds.My interpreter, however, whom I believe to be a coward,insisted that they were killed by the Sauteurs. Made arrangements for my departure.

Oct. 26th. Launched my canoes and found them verysmall. My hunter killed three deer. Took Miller and remained out all night, but killed nothing.

Sunday, Oct. 27th. Employed in preparing our baggage to depart.

Oct. 28th. My two canoes being finished, launched, and brought to the head of the rapids, I put my provision,ammunition, etc., on board, intending to embark by day.Left them under the charge of the sentinel; in an hour one of them sunk, in which was the ammunition and my baggage;this was occasioned by what is called a wind-shock.[II-22]This misfortune, and the extreme smallness of my canoes,induced me to build another. I had my cartridges spread out on blankets and large fires made around them. At that time I was not able to ascertain the extent of the misfortune,the magnitude of which none can estimate, save only those in the same situation with ourselves, 1,500 miles from civilized society; and in danger of losing the very means of defense — nay, of existence.

Oct. 29th. Felled a large pine and commenced another canoe. I was at work on my cartridges all day, but did not save five dozen out of 30. In attempting to dry the powder in pots I blew it up, and it had nearly blown up a tent and two or three men with it. Made a dozen new cartridges with the old wrapping-paper.

Oct. 30th. My men labored as usual. Nothing extraordinary.

Oct. 31st. Inclosed my little work completely with pickets. Hauled up my two boats, and turned them over on each side of the gateway, by which means a defense was made to the river. Had it not been for various political reasons, I would have laughed at the attack of 800 or 1,000 savages, if all my party were within. For, except accidents,it would only have afforded amusement, the Indians having no idea of taking a place by storm. Found myself powerfullyattacked with the fantastics of the brain called ennui,at the mention of which I had hitherto scoffed; but my books being packed up, I was like a person entranced, and could easily conceive why so many persons who had been confined to remote places acquired the habit of drinking to excess and many other vicious practices, which have been adopted merely to pass time.

Nov. 1st. Finding that my canoe would not be finished in two or three days, I concluded to take six men and go down the river about 12 miles [vicinity of Buffalo cr. (TwoRivers)], where we had remarked great sign of elk and buffalo. Arrived there about the middle of the afternoon.All turned out to hunt. None of us killed anything butSparks, one doe. A slight snow fell.

Nov. 2d. Left the camp with the fullest determination to kill an elk, if it were possible, before my return. I never had killed one of those animals. Took Miller, whose obliging disposition made him agreeable in the woods.I was determined, if we came on the trail of elk, to follow them a day or two in order to kill one. This, to a person acquainted with the nature of those animals, and the extent of the prairies in this country, would appear, what it really was, a very foolish resolution. We soon struck where a herd of 150 had passed. Pursued and came in sight about eight o’clock, when they appeared, at a distance, like an army of Indians moving along in single file; a large buck,of at least four feet between the horns, leading the van, and one of equal magnitude bringing up the rear.We followed until near night, without once being able to get within pointblank shot. I once made Miller fire at them with his musket, at about 400 yards’ distance;it had no other effect than to make them leave us about five miles behind on the prairie. Passed several deer in the course of the day, which I think we could have killed,but did not fire for fear of alarming the elk. Finding that it was no easy matter to kill one, I shot a doe through thebody, as I perceived by her blood where she lay down inthe snow; yet, not knowing how to track, we lost her.Shortly after saw three elk by themselves near a copse of woods. Approached near them and broke the shoulder of one; but he ran off with the other two just as I was about to follow. Saw a buck deer lying on the grass; shot him between the eyes, when he fell over. I walked up to him,put my foot on his horns, and examined the shot; immediately after which he snorted, bounced up, and fell five steps from me. This I considered his last effort; but soon after, to our utter astonishment, he jumped up and ran off.He stopped frequently; we pursued him, expecting him to fall every minute; by which we were led from the pursuit of the wounded elk. After being wearied out in this unsuccessful chase we returned in pursuit of the wounded elk,and when we came up to the party, found him missing from the flock. Shot another in the body; but my ball being small, he likewise escaped. Wounded another deer; when,hungry, cold, and fatigued, after having wounded three deer and two elk, we were obliged to encamp in a point of hemlock woods, on the head of Clear [Platte] river. The large herd of elk lay about one mile from us, in the prairie. Our want of success I ascribe to the smallness of our balls, and to our inexperience in following the track after wounding the game, for it is very seldom a deer drops on the spot you shoot it.

Sunday, Nov. 3d. Rose pretty early and went in pursuit of the elk. Wounded one buck deer on the way. We made an attempt to drive them into the woods; but their leader broke past us, and it appeared as if the drove would have followed him, though they had been obliged to run over us. We fired at them passing, but without effect.Pursued them through the swamp till about ten o’clock,when I determined to attempt to make the river, and for that purpose took a due south course. Passed many droves of elk and buffalo, but being in the middle of an immense prairie, knew it was folly to attempt to shoot them.Wounded several deer, but got none. In fact, I knewI could shoot as many deer as anybody; but neither myself nor company could find one in ten, whereas one experienced hunter would get all. Near night struck a lake about five miles long and two miles wide. Saw immense droves of elk on both banks. About sundown saw a herd crossing the prairie toward us. We sat down. Two bucks, more curious than the others, came pretty close. I struck one behind the fore shoulder; he did not go more than 20 yards before he fell and died. This was the cause of much exultation,because it fulfilled my determination; and, as we had been two days and nights without victuals, it was very acceptable. Found some scrub oak. In about one mile made a fire, and with much labor and pains got our meat to it; the wolves feasting on one half while we were carrying away the other. We were now provisioned, but were still in want of water, the snow being all melted. Finding my drought very excessive in the night, I went in search of water, and was much surprised, after having gone about a mile, to strike the Mississippi. Filled my hat and returned to my companion.

Nov. 4th. Repaired my mockinsons, using a piece of elk’s bone as an awl. We both went to the Mississippi and found we were a great distance from the camp. I left Miller to guard the meat and marched for camp. Having strained my ankles in the swamps, they were extremely sore, and the strings of my mockinsons cut them and made them swell considerably. Before I had gone far I discovered a herd of 10 elk; approached within 50 yards and shot one through the body. He fell on the spot; but rose again and ran off.I pursued him at least five miles, expecting every minute to see him drop. I then gave him up. When I arrived atClear [Platte] river, a deer was standing on the other bank.I killed him on the spot, and while I was taking out the entrails another came up. I shot him also. This was my last ball, and then only could I kill! Left part of my clothes at this place to scare the wolves. Arrived at my camp at dusk, to the great joy of our men, who had beento our little garrison to inquire for me, and receiving no intelligence, had concluded we were killed by the Indians,having heard them fire on the opposite bank. The same night we saw fires on the opposite shore in the prairie; this was likewise seen in the fort, when all the men moved into the works.

Nov. 5th. Sent four of my men with one canoe, loaded with the balance of nine deer that had been killed; with the other two, went down the river for my meat. Stopped for the deer, which I found safe. Miller had just started to march home, but returned to camp with us. Found all the meat safe, and brought it to the river, where we pitched our camp.

Nov. 6th. At the earnest entreaties of my men, and with a hope of killing some more game, I agreed to stay and hunt. We went out and found that all the elk and buffalo had gone down the river from those plains the day before,leaving large roads to point out their course. This would not appear extraordinary to persons acquainted with the nature of those animals, as the prairie had unluckily caught fire. After Miller left the camp for home, Sparks killed two deer, about six miles off; and it being near the river,I sent the three men down with the canoe, to return early in the morning. It commenced snowing about midnight,and by morning was six inches deep.

Nov. 7th. Waited all day with the greatest anxiety for my men. The river became nearly filled with snow, partly congealed into ice. My situation can more easily be imagined than described. Went down the river to where I understood the deer were killed; but discovered nothing of my men. I now became very uneasy on their account, forI was well aware of the hostile disposition of the Indians to all persons on this part of the Mississippi, taking them to be traders — and we had not yet had an opportunity of explaining to them who we were. Snow still continued falling very fast, and was nearly knee-deep. Had great difficulty to procure wood sufficient to keep up a fire all night. Ice in the river thickening.

Nov. 8th. My men not yet arrived. I determined to depart for the garrison, and when the river had frozen, to come down on the ice with a party, or, if the weather became mild, by water, with my other peroques, to search for my poor men. Put up about ten pounds of meat, two blankets, and a bearskin, with my sword and gun, which made for me a very heavy load. Left the meat in as good a situation as possible. Wrote on the snow my wishes, and put my handkerchief up as a flag. Departed. My anxiety of mind was so great that, notwithstanding my load and the depth of the snow, I made into the bottom, above our former hunting-camp, a little before night. Passed several deer and one elk, which I might probably have killed; but not knowing whether I should be able to secure the meat if I killed them, and bearing in mind that they were created for the use and not the sport of man, I did not fire at them.While I was endeavoring to strike fire I heard voices, and looking round, observed Corporal Meek and three men passing. Called them to me, and we embarked together.They were on their march down to see if they could render us any assistance in ascending the river. They were much grieved to hear my report of the other men, CorporalBradley, Sparks, and Miller.

Nov. 9th. Snowed a little. The men carried my pack.I was so sore that it was with difficulty I carried my gun;fortunately they brought with them a pair of mockinsons,sent me by one of my soldiers, Owings, who had rightly calculated that I was bare-foot; also a phial of whisky, sent by the sergeant; were both very acceptable to me. They brought also some tobacco for my lost men. We experienced difficulty in crossing the river, owing to the ice.Moved into the post my command, who were again encamped out, ready to march up the river. Set all hands to making sleds, in order that the moment the river closed I might descend, with a strong party, in search of my lost men. Issued provisions, and was obliged to use six venison hams, being part of a quantity of elegant hams I had preserved115to take down, if possible, to the general and some other friends. Had the two hunters not been found, I must have become a slave to hunting in order to support my party.The ice still ran very thick.

Sunday, Nov. 10th. Continued making sleds. No news of my hunters. Ice in the river very thick and hard. Raised my tent with puncheons, and laid a floor in it.

Nov. 11th. I went out hunting. Saw but two deer.Killed a remarkably large black fox. Bradley and Miller arrived, having understood the writing on the snow, and leftSparks behind at the camp to take care of the meat. Their detention was owing to their being lost on the prairie the first night, and not being able to find their deer.

Nov. 12th. Dispatched Miller and Huddleston to the lower hunting-camp, and Bradley and Brown to hunting in the woods. Made my arrangements in camp. Thawing weather.

Nov. 13th. Bradley returned with a very large buck,which supplied us for the next four days.

Nov. 14th. It commenced raining at 4 o’clock a. m.;lightning and loud thunder. I went down the river in one of my canoes, with five men, in order to bring up the meat from the lower camp; but after descending about 13 miles,found the river blocked up with ice. Returned about two miles and encamped in the bottom where I had my hunting-camp on the 1st inst. Extremely cold toward night.

Nov. 15th. When we meant to embark in the morning,found the river full of ice and hardly moving. Returned to camp and went out to hunt, for we had no provision with us. Killed nothing but five prairie-hens, which afforded us this day’s subsistence; this bird I took to be the same as grouse. Expecting the ice had become hard, we attempted to cross the river, but could not. In the endeavor one man fell through. Freezing.

Nov. 16th. Detached Corporal Meek and one private to the garrison, to order the sleds down. No success in hunting,except a few fowl. I began to consider the life of a huntera very slavish life, and extremely precarious as to support;for sometimes I have myself, although no hunter, killed 600 weight of meat in one day; and I have hunted three days successively without killing anything but a few small birds,which I was obliged to do to keep my men from starving.Freezing.

Sunday, Nov. 17th. One of my men arrived; he had attempted to make the camp before, but lost himself in the prairie, lay out all night, and froze his toes. He informed us that the corporal and the men I sent with him had their toes frost-bitten, the former very badly; that three men were on their way down by land, the river above not being frozen over. They arrived a few hours before night. Freezing.

Nov. 18th. Took our departure down the river on the ice, our baggage on the sled. Ice very rough. Distance 12 miles. Freezing.

Nov. 19th. Arrived opposite our hunting-camp about noon. Had the meat, etc., moved over. They had a large quantity of meat. I went out and killed a very large buck.Thawing.

Nov. 20th. Departed to return to the stockade, part of our meat on the sled and part in the little peroque, the river being open in the middle. Killed four deer. Thawing.Distance five miles.

Nov. 21st. Marched in the morning. Came to a place where the river was very narrow, and the channel blocked up. Were obliged to unload our peroque and haul her over. The river having swelled a good deal at this place the ice gave way with myself and two men on it. We seized the sled that stood by us, with some little baggage on it, and by jumping over four cracks, the last two feet wide, providentially made our passage good without losing an individual thing. Encamped opposite Clear[Platte] river. Killed one deer and one otter. Freezing.

Nov. 22d. Were obliged to leave our canoe at Clear river,the river being closed. Made two trips with our sled.Killed one deer. Distance five miles.

Nov. 23d. Having seen a great deal of buffalo sign, I determined to kill one the next day — forgetting the elk chase. Encamped nearly opposite our camp of the 15th and 16th. Thawing. Distance four miles.

Sunday, Nov. 24th. Took Miller and Boley and went in pursuit of buffalo. Came up with some about ten o’clock.In the afternoon wounded one. Pursued them until night,and encamped on the side of a swamp. Thawing.

Nov. 25th. Commenced again the pursuit of the buffalo,and continued till eleven o’clock, when I gave up the chase.Arrived at the camp about sundown, hungry and weary,having eaten nothing since we left it. My rifle carried too small a ball to kill buffalo; the balls should not be more than 30 to the pound — an ounce ball would be still preferable — and the animal should be hunted on horse-back.I think that in the prairies of this country the bow and arrow could be used to more advantage than the gun;for you might ride immediately alongside, and strike them where you pleased, leaving them to proceed after others.Thawing.

Nov. 26th. Proceeded up the river. The ice getting very rotten, the men fell through several times. Thawing.Distance five miles.

Nov. 27th. Took one man and marched to the post.Found all well. My hunter, Bradley, had killed 11 deer since my departure. Sent all the men down to help the party up. They returned, accompanied by two Indians,who informed me they were two men of a band who resided on Lake Superior, called the Fols Avoins, but spoke the language of the Chipeways. They informed me that Mr.Dickson’s[II-23] and the other trading-houses were establishedabout 60 miles below, and that there were 70 lodges ofSioux on the Mississippi. All my men arrived at the post.We brought from our camp below the balance of 17 deer and 2 elk.

Nov. 28th. The Indians departed, much pleased with their reception. I dispatched Corporal Meek and one private down to Dickson with a letter, which would at least have the effect of attaching the most powerful tribes in this quarter to my interest.

Nov. 29th. A Sioux, the son of a warrior called the Killeur Rouge,[II-24] of the Gens des Feuilles, and a Fols Avoin,came to the post. He said that having struck our trail below and finding some to be shoe-tracks, he conceived it to be the establishment of some traders, took it, and came to the post. He informed me that Mr. Dickson had told the Sioux "that they might now hunt where they pleased, as I had gone ahead and would cause the Chipeways,wherever I met them, to treat them with friendship; that I had barred up the mouth of the St. Peters, so that no liquor could ascend that river; but that if they came on the Mississippi they should have what liquor they wanted;also, that I was on the river and had a great deal of merchandise to give them in presents." This information of Mr. Dickson to the Indians seemed to have self-interest and envy for its motives; for, by the idea of my having prevented liquor from going up the St. Peters he gave the Indians to understand that it was a regulation of my own,and not a law of the United States; by assuring them he would sell to them on the Mississippi, he drew all theIndians from the traders on the St. Peters, who had adhered to the restriction of not selling liquor; and should any of them be killed the blame would all lie on me, as he had without authority assured them they might hunt insecurity. I took care to give the young chief a full explanation of my ideas on the subject. He remained all night. Killed two deer.

Nov. 30th. I made the two Indians some small presents.They crossed the river and departed. Detached Kennerman with 11 men to bring up the two canoes.

STOPPED HERE

Sunday, Dec. 1st. Snowed a little in the middle of the day. Went out with my gun, but killed nothing.

Dec. 2d. Sparks arrived from the party below, and informed me they could not kill any game, but had started up with the little peroque; also, that Mr. Dickson and a Frenchman had passed my detachment about three hours before. He left them on their march to the post. Sparks arrived about ten o’clock at night.

Dec. 3d. Mr. Dickson, with an engagee and a youngIndian, arrived at the fort. I received him with every politeness in my power, and after a serious conversation with him on the subject of the information given me on the 29th ult., was induced to believe it in part incorrect. He assured me that no liquor was sold by him, or by any houses under his direction. He gave me much useful information relative to my future route, which gave me great encouragement as to the certainty of my accomplishing the object of my voyage to the fullest extent. He seemed to be a gentleman of general commercial knowledge, possessing much geographical information of the western country,and of open, frank manners. He gave me many assurances of his good wishes for the prosperity of my undertaking.

Dec. 4th. My men arrived with one canoe only. Calculated on returning them two days later.

Dec. 5th. Mr. Dickson, with his two men, departed for their station [in the vicinity of Thousand Islands, below St.Cloud], after having furnished me with a letter for a young man of his house on Lake de Sable [Sandy lake], andcarte blanche as to my commands on him. Weather mild.

Dec. 6th. I dispatched my men down to bring up the other peroque with a strong sled on which it was intended to put the canoe about one-third, and to let the end drag on the ice. Three families of the Fols Avoins arrived and encamped near the fort; also, one Sioux, who pretended to have been sent to me from the Gens des Feuilles, to inform me that the Yanctongs and Sussitongs,[II-25] two bands of Sioux from the head of the St. Peters and the Missouri, and the most savage of them, had commenced the war-dance and would depart in a few days; in which case he conceived it would be advisable for the Fols Avoins to keep close under my protection; that making a stroke on the Chipeways would tend to injure the grand object of my voyage, etc.Some reasons induced me to believe he was a self-created envoy; however, I offered to pay him, or any young Sioux,who would go to those bands and carry my word. Hepromised to make known my wishes upon his return. My men returned in the evening without my canoe, having been so unfortunate as to split her in carrying her over the rough hilly ice in the ripples below. So many disappointments almost wearied out my patience; notwithstanding,I intended to embark by land and water in a few days.

Dec. 7th. An Indian by the name of Chien Blanche,[II-26]of the Fols Avoin tribe, with his family and connections, arrived and encamped near the stockade. He informed me that he had wintered here for ten years past; that the sugar-camp near the stockade was where he made sugar. He appeared to be an intelligent man. I visited his camp in the afternoon, and found him seated amidst his children and grandchildren, amounting in all to ten. His wife, although of an advanced age, was suckling two children that appeared to be about two years old. I should have taken them to bet wins, had not one been much fairer than the other. Upon inquiry, however, I found that the fairest was the daughter of an Englishman, by one of the Indian’s daughters, lately deceased; since whose death the grandmother had taken it to the breast. His lodge was made of rushes plaited into mats, after the manner of the Illinois. I was obliged to give some meat to all the Indians who arrived at the stockade,at the same time explaining our situation. The Chien Blanche assured me it should be repaid with interest in the course of the winter, but that at that time he was without anything to eat. In fact, our hunters having killed nothing for several days, we were ourselves on short allowance.

Dec. 8th. An invalid Sioux arrived with the information that the bands of the Sussitongs and Yanctongs had actually determined to make war on the Chipeways, and that they had formed a party of 150 or 160 men; but that part of the Sussitongs had refused to go to war, and would be here on a visit to me the next day. This occasioned meto delay crossing the river immediately, on my voyage toLake Sang Sue [Leech lake], as it was possible that by having a conference with them I might still prevent the stroke intended to be made against the Chipeways.

Dec. 9th. Prepared to embark. Expecting the Sioux, I had two large kettles of soup made for them. Had a shooting-match with four prizes. The Sioux did not arrive, and we ate the soup ourselves. Crossed the river and encamped above the [Knife or Pike] rapids.[II-27] Wind changed and it grew cold.

Dec. 10th. After arranging our sleds and peroque we commenced our march. My sleds were such as are frequently seen about farmers’ yards, calculated to hold two barrels or 400 weight, in which two men were geared abreast.The sleds on the prairie and the peroque were towed by three men. Found it extremely difficult to get along, the snow being melted off the prairie in spots. The men who had the canoe were obliged to wade and drag her over the rocks in many places. Shot the only deer I saw; it fell three times, and then made its escape. This was a great disappointment,for upon the game we took now we depended for our subsistence. This evening disclosed to my men the real danger they had to encounter. Distance five miles.[II-28]

Dec. 11th. It having thawed all night, the snow had almost melted from the prairie. I walked on until ten o’clock,and made a fire. I then went back to look for the peroque,and at a remarkable [Little Elk] rapid in the river, opposite a high piny island, made a fire and waited for them to come up, when we partly unloaded. I returned and met the sleds. When we arrived at the place pitched on for our camp, I sent the men down to assist the peroque. In the afternoon, from about three o’clock, we heard the report of not less than 50 guns ahead, and after dusk much shooting on the prairie. I was at a loss to know who they could be,unless they were Sauteaux, and what could be their objectin shooting after dark. Kept a good lookout. Distance five miles.[II-29]

Dec. 12th. The snow having almost entirely left the prairie, we were obliged to take on but one sled at a time and treble man it. In the morning my interpreter came tome with quite a martial air, and requested that he might be allowed to go ahead to discover what Indians we heard fire last evening. I gave him permission and away he went.Shortly after, I went out with Corporal Bradley and a private,and in about an hour overtook my partizan, on a bottom close to the river; he was hunting raccoons, and had caught five. We left him; and after choosing an encampment and sending the private back to conduct the party to it, the corporal and myself marched on, anxious to discover theIndians. We ascended the river about eight miles; saw no Indians, but discovered that the river was frozen over.This pleased me more, for we would now be enabled to walk three times our usual distance in a day.

I was much surprised that we saw no Indians. After our return to camp I was told that a Fols Avoin Indian had met my party and informed them that in the rear of the hills that bordered the prairie there were many small lakes which by portages communicated with Lake Superior; that in one day’s march on that course we would find English trading-houses;that the Chipeways were there hunting; that theSioux who had visited my camp on the 29th ult., on hearingthe firing, had prudently returned with his companions to the west side of the Mississippi, agreeably to my advice.How persons unacquainted with the searching spirit of trade and the enterprise of the people of the northwest would be surprised to find people who had penetrated from LakeSuperior to lakes little more than marshes! It likewise points out the difficulty of putting a barrier on their trade.

All my sleds and peroques did not get up until half-past ten o’clock. Saw a very beautiful fox, with red back, whitetail and breast. My interpreter called them reynard d’argent[silver fox]. I had no opportunity of shooting him.Killed six raccoons and one porcupine [Erethizon dorsatum].Fine day. Distance seven miles.[II-30]

Dec. 13th. Made double trips. Embarked at the upper end of the ripples. It commenced snowing at three o’clock.Bradley killed one deer, another man killed one raccoon.Storm continued until next morning. Distance five miles.[II-31]

Dec. 14th. We departed from our encampment at the usual hour, but had not advanced one mile when the foremost sled, which happened unfortunately to carry my baggage and ammunition, fell into the river. We were all inthe river up to our middle in recovering the things. Halted and made a fire. Came to where the river was frozen over.Stopped and encamped on the west shore, in a pine wood["Pine camp" of Mar. 4th, 1806]. Upon examining my things, found all my baggage wet and some of my books materially injured; but a still greater injury was, that all my cartridges and four pounds of double battle Sussex powder which I had brought for my own use, were destroyed.Fortunately my kegs of powder were preserved dry, and some bottles of common glazed powder, which were so tightly corked as not to admit water. Had this not been the case, my voyage must necessarily have been terminated,for we could not have subsisted without ammunition. During the time of our misfortune, two Fols Avoin Indians came to us, one of whom was at my stockade on the 29th ult., in company with the Sioux. I signified to them by signs the place of our encampment, and invited them to come and encamp with us. They left me and both arrived at my camp in the evening, having each a deer which they presented me; I gave them my canoe to keep until spring,and in the morning at parting made them a small present.Sat up until three o’clock drying and assorting my ammunition,baggage, etc. Killed two deer. Distance four miles.

Sunday, Dec. 15th. Remained at our camp making sleds.Killed two deer. Crossed and recrossed several Indian trails in the woods.

Dec. 16th. Remained at the same camp, employed as yesterday. Killed three deer. I wounded a buffalo in the shoulder, and by a fair race overtook him in the prairie and gave him another shot; but it being near night left him till morning.[II-32]

Dec. 17th. Departed from our agreeable encampment a tan early hour. Found our sleds to be very heavily loaded.Broke one sled-runner and were detained by other circumstances.Bradley, Rosseau the interpreter, and myself killed four deer and wounded five others. Having 11 on hand already, I found it necessary to leave behind some of my other lading. At night we dug a hole, four feet deep, three feet wide, and six feet long, in which we put one barrel of pork and one barrel of flour, after wrapping them up in seven deerskins to preserve them from the damp; we then filled up the hole and built our fire immediately over it.[II-33]

Dec. 18th. Did not get off until eight o’clock, from the delay in bringing in our meat. Ice tolerably good. Began to see the Chipeway encampments very frequently, but had not entirely left the Sioux country on the western shore.Beautiful pine ridges.

Dec. 19th. Were obliged to take to the prairie, from the river’s being open: but the snow was frozen hard and the sleds did not sink deep, so that we made a pretty good day’sjourney. Killed one deer and two otters. River still open.Distance 10 miles.[II-34]

Dec. 20th. Traveled part of the day on the prairie and on the ice. Killed one deer. Heard three reports of guns just at sunset, from the opposite side of the river. Deposited one barrel of flour. Distance seven miles.[II-35]

Dec. 21st. Bradley and myself went on ahead and overtook my interpreter, who had left camp very early in hopes that he would be able to see the river De Corbeau, where he had twice wintered. He was immediately opposite a large island [ — — le de Corbeau[II-36]], which he supposed to havegreat resemblance to an island opposite the mouth of the above river; but finally he concluded it was not the island and returned to camp. But this was actually the [Rivièrede Corbeau or Crow Wing] river, as we discovered when we got to the head of the island, from which we could seethe river’s entrance. This fact exposes the ignorance and inattention of the French and traders, and, with the exception of a few intelligent men, what little confidence is to be placed on their information. We ascended the Mississippi about five miles above the confluence; found it not frozen,but in many places not more than 100 yards over, mild and still; it had indeed all the appearance of a small river of a low country. Returned and found that my party, having broken sleds, etc., had only made good three miles, whileI had marched 35.

Sunday, Dec. 22d. Killed three deer. Owing to the many difficult places we had to pass, made but 4½ miles.

Dec. 23d. Never did I undergo more fatigue, performing the duties of hunter, spy, guide, commanding officer, etc.,sometimes in front, sometimes in the rear, frequently in advance of my party 10 or 15 miles. At night I was scarcely able to make my notes intelligible. Killed two raccoons.From our sleds breaking down, and having to make so many portages on the road, made but four miles.[II-37]

Dec. 24th. Took the latitude of the Isle de Corbeau, and found it to be in 45° 49´ 50´´ N. [It is above 46°.] TheMississippi becomes very narrow above the river De Corbeau;and, as if it were the forks, changes its direction from hardW. [read N.] to N. E. generally.[II-38] Distance 10½ miles.[II-39]

Dec. 25th. Marched, and encamped at eleven o’clock.Gave out two pounds of extra meat, two pounds of extra flour, one gill of whisky, and some tobacco per man, in order to distinguish Christmas Day. Distance three miles. [Not quite to Brainerd yet.]

Dec. 26th. Broke four sleds, broke into the river four times, and had four carrying-places, since we left the riverDe Corbeau. The timber was all yellow and pitch pine, of which there were scarcely any below. Distance three miles.[II-40]

Dec. 27th. After two carrying-places we arrived where the river was completely closed with ice; after which weproceeded with some degree of speed and ease. Killed one bear. The country on both sides presented a dreary and barren prospect of high rocks, with dead pine timber. Snow.Distance 10 miles.[II-41]

Dec. 28th. Two sleds fell through the ice. In the morning passed a very poor country with bare knobs on each side; but toward evening the bottoms became larger and the pine ridges better timbered. Bradley and myself marched 10 miles beyond the sleds. Killed one deer.Distance 12 miles.[II-42]

Sunday, Dec. 29th. Cold, windy day. Met with no material interruptions; passed some rapids. The snow blew from the woods on to the river. The country was full of small lakes, some three miles in circumference. Distance 21 miles.[II-43]

Dec. 30th. The snow having drifted on the ice retarded the sleds. Numerous small lakes and pine ridges continued.A new species of pine, called the French sap pine. Killed one otter [Lutra canadensis]. Distance 12 miles.[II-44]

Dec. 31st. Passed Pine[II-45] river about eleven o’clock. At its mouth there was a Chipeway’s encampment of 15 lodges;this had been occupied in the summer, but was now vacant.By the significations of their marks we understood that they had marched a party of 50 warriors against the Sioux, and had killed four men and four women, which were represented by images carved out of pine or cedar. The four men were painted and put in the ground to the middle,leaving above ground those parts which are generally concealed; by their sides were four painted poles, sharpened at the end to represent the women. Near this were poles with deerskins, plumes, silk handkerchiefs, etc.; also, a circular hoop of cedar with something attached, representing a scalp.Near each lodge they had holes dug in the ground, and boughs ready to cover them, as a retreat for their women and children if attacked by the Sioux.

Wednesday, Jan. 1st, 1806. Passed on the bank of the river [1 m. above Dean brook] six very elegant bark canoes,which had been laid up by the Chipeways; also, a camp which we conceived to have been evacuated about ten days.My interpreter came after me in a great hurry, conjuring me not to go so far ahead, and assured me that the Chipeways,encountering me without an interpreter, party, or flag,would certainly kill me. Notwithstanding this I went on several miles further than usual, in order to make any discoveries that were to be made; conceiving the savages not so barbarous or ferocious as to fire on two men (I had one with me) who were apparently coming into their country,trusting to their generosity; and knowing that if we met only two or three we were equal to them, I having my gunand pistols and he his buck-shot. Made some extra presents for New Year’s Day.

Jan. 2d. Fine warm day. Discovered fresh sign ofIndians. Just as we were encamping at night, my sentinel informed us that some Indians were coming full speed upon our trail or track. I ordered my men to stand by their guns carefully. They were immediately at my camp, and saluted the flag by a discharge of three pieces; when fourChipeways, one Englishman, and a Frenchman of theN. W. Company, presented themselves. They informed us that some women, having discovered our trail, gave the alarm, and not knowing but it was their enemies, they had departed to make a discovery. They had heard of us and revered our flag. Mr. [Cuthbert — ] Grant, the Englishman,had only arrived the day before from Lake De Sable [Sandylake], from which he had marched in one day and a half.I presented the Indians with half a deer, which they received thankfully, for they had discovered our fires some days ago, and believing it to be the Sioux, they dared not leave their camp. They returned, but Mr. Grant remained all night.

Jan. 3d. My party marched early, but I returned with Mr. Grant to his establishment on [Lower] Red CedarLake, having one corporal with me. When we came insight of his house I observed the flag of Great Britain flying. I felt indignant, and cannot say what my feelings would have excited me to do, had he not informed me that it belonged to the Indians. This was not much more agreeable to me. After explaining to a Chipeway warrior called Curly Head [Curleyhead in text of 1807, p. 33[II-46]] theobject of my voyage, and receiving his answer that he would remain tranquil until my return, we ate a good breakfast for the country, departed, and overtook my sleds just at dusk. Killed one porcupine. Distance 16 miles.[II-47]

Jan. 4th. We made 28 points[II-48] in the river; broad, good bottom, and of the usual timber. In the night I was awakened by the cry of the sentinel, calling repeatedly to the men; at length he vociferated, "G — d d — n your souls,will you let the lieutenant be burned to death — " This immediately aroused me. At first I seized my arms, but looking round I saw my tents in flames. The men flew to my assistance and we tore them down, but not until they were entirely ruined. This, with the loss of my leggins,mockinsons, socks, etc., which I had hung up to dry, was not rivial misfortune, in such a country and on such a voyage.But I had reason to thank God that the powder, three small casks of which I had in my tent, did not take fire; if it hadI must certainly have lost all my baggage, if not my life.

Sunday, Jan. 5th. Mr. Grant promised to overtake me yesterday, but has not yet arrived. I conceived it would be necessary to attend his motions with careful observation.Distance 27 miles.[II-49]

Jan. 6th. Bradley and myself walked up 31 points, in hopes to discover Lake De Sable [Sandy lake]; but finding a near cut of 20 yards for 10 [two — ] miles, and being fearful the sleds would miss it, we returned 23 points before we found our camp. They had made only eight points. Met two Frenchmen of the N. W. Company with about 180[qu. 80 — ] pounds on each of their backs, with rackets [snowshoes]on; they informed me that Mr. Grant had gone on with the Frenchman. Snow fell all day and was three feet deep. Spent a miserable night.

Jan. 7th. Made but 11 miles, and then were obliged to send ahead and make fires every three miles; notwithstanding which the cold was so intense that some of the men hadtheir noses, others their fingers, and others their toes frozen,before they felt the cold sensibly. Very severe day’s march.

Jan. 8th. Conceiving I was at no great distance fromSandy Lake, I left my sleds, and with Corporal Bradley took my departure for that place, intending to send him back the same evening. We walked on very briskly until near night,when we met a young Indian, one of those who had visited my camp near [Lower] Red Cedar Lake. I endeavored to explain to him that it was my wish to go to Lake De Sable that evening. He returned with me until we came to a trail that led across the woods; this he signified was a near course. I went this course with him, and shortly after found myself at a Chipeway encampment, to which I believe the friendly savage had enticed me with an expectation thatI would tarry all night, knowing that it was too late for us to make the lake in good season. But upon our refusing to stay, he put us in the right road. We arrived at the place where the track left the Mississippi, at dusk, when we traversed about two leagues of a wilderness, without any very great difficulty, and at length struck the shore of Lake De Sable,over a branch of which our course lay. The snow having covered the trail made by the Frenchmen who had passed before with the rackets, I was fearful of losing ourselves on the lake; the consequence of which can only be conceived by those who have been exposed on a lake, or naked plain,a dreary night of January, in latitude 47° and the thermometer below zero. Thinking that we could observe the bank of the other shore, we kept a straight course, some time after discovered lights, and on our arrival were not a little surprised to find a large stockade. The gate being open,we entered and proceeded to the quarters of Mr. Grant,where we were treated with the utmost hospitality.

Jan. 9th. Marched the corporal [back] early, in order that our men should receive assurances of our safety and success. He carried with him a small keg of spirits, a present from Mr. Grant. The establishment of this place was formed 12 years since by the N. W. Company, and was formerly under the charge of a Mr. Charles Brusky [Bousquai[II-50]].It has attained at present such regularity as to permit the superintendent to live tolerably comfortable. They have horses procured from Red river of the Indians; raise plenty of Irish potatoes; catch pike, suckers, pickerel, andwhite-fish in abundance. They have also beaver, deer, and moose; but the provision they chiefly depend upon is wild oats, of which they purchase great quantities from the savages,giving at the rate of about $1.50 per bushel. But flour, pork, and salt are almost interdicted to persons not principals in the trade. Flour sells at 50 cts.; salt, $1; pork,80 cts.; sugar, 50 cts.; coffee, — — , and tea, $4.50 per pound. The sugar is obtained from the Indians, and is made from the maple tree.

Jan. 10th. Mr. Grant accompanied me to the Mississippi to mark the place for my boats to leave that river. This was the first time I marched on rackets. I took the course of [Sandy] Lake river, from its mouth to the lake. Mr.Grant fell through the ice with his rackets on, and could not have got out without assistance.

Jan. 11th. Remained all day within quarters.

Sunday, Jan. 12th. Went out and met my men about 16 miles. A tree had fallen on one of them and hurt him very much, which induced me to dismiss a sled and put the lading on the others.

Jan. 13th. After encountering much difficulty, we [the main party] arrived at the establishment of the N. W. Company on Lake de Sable, a little before night. The ice being very bad on [Sandy] Lake river, owing to the many springs and marshes, one sled fell through. My men had an excellent room furnished them, and were presented with potatoes and fille (cant term for a dram of spirits). Mr. Grant had gone to an Indian lodge to receive his credits.

Jan. 14th. Crossed the lake to the north side, that I might take an observation; found the lat. 46° 9´ 20´´ N. [it is about 46° 46´]. Surveyed that part of the lake. Mr. Grant returned from the Indian lodges. They brought a quantity of furs and 11 beaver carcases.

Jan. 15th. Mr. Grant and myself made the tour of the lake, with two men whom I had for attendants. Found it to be much larger than could be imagined at a view. My men sawed stocks for the sleds, which I found it necessaryto construct after the manner of the country. On our march met an Indian coming into the fort; his countenance expressed no little astonishment when told who I was and whence I came; for the people in this country themselves acknowledge that the savages hold the Americans in greater veneration than any other white people. They say of us,when alluding to warlike achievements, that we "are neitherFrenchmen nor Englishmen, but white Indians."

Jan. 16th. Laid down Lake De Sable, etc. A young Indian whom I had engaged to go as a guide to Lake SangSue [Leech Lake], arrived from the woods.

Jan. 17th. Employed in making sleds, or traineaux deglace, after the manner of the country. Those sleds are made of a single plank turned up at one end like a fiddle head,and the baggage is lashed on in bags and sacks. Two other Indians arrived from the woods. Engaged in writing.

Jan. 18th. Busy in preparing my baggage for my departure for Leech Lake, reading, etc.

Sunday, Jan. 19th. Employed as yesterday. Two men of the N. W. Company arrived from Fond du Lac Superior with letters, one of which was from their establishment inAthapuscow [Athapasca], and had been since last May on the route. While at this post I ate roasted beavers, dressed in every respect as a pig is usually dressed with us; it was excellent. I could not discern the least taste of Des Bois[i. e., of the wood on which beavers feed]. I also ate boiled moose’s head: when well boiled, I consider it equal to the tail of the beaver; in taste and substance they are much alike.

Jan. 20th. The men with the sleds took their departure about two o’clock. Shortly after I followed them. We encamped at the portage between the Mississippi and LeechLake [i. e., Willow[II-51]] river. Snow fell in the night.

Jan. 21st. Snowed in the morning, but we crossed [Willowportage] about nine o’clock. I had gone on a few points when I was overtaken by Mr. Grant, who informed me that the sleds could not get along, in consequence of water being on the ice [of Willow river]; he sent his men forward. We returned and met the sleds, which had scarcely advanced one mile. We unloaded them and sent eight men back to the post [on Sandy lake] with whatever might be denominated extra articles; but in the hurry sent my salt and ink. Mr. Grant encamped with me and marched early in the morning [of the 22d].

Jan. 22d. Made a pretty good day’s journey. My Indian came up about noon. Distance 20 miles.

Jan. 23d. Marched about 18 miles. Forgot my thermometer,having hung it on a tree; sent Boley back five miles for it. My young Indian and myself killed eight partridges; took him to live with me.

Jan. 24th. At our encampment this night Mr. Grant had encamped on the night of the same day he left me; it was three days’ march for us. In the evening the father of his girl came to my camp and stayed all night; he appeared very friendly and was very communicative; but having no interpreter, we made but little progress in conversation. It was late before the men came up.

Jan. 25th. Traveled almost all day through the lands,and found them much better than usual. Boley lost theSioux pipe stem which I carried along for the purpose of making peace with the Chipeways; I sent him back for it;he did not return until eleven o’clock at night. It was very warm; thawing all day. Distance 44 points.

Sunday, Jan. 26th. I left my party in order to proceed to a house or lodge of Mr. Grant’s on the Mississippi [oppositeGrand Rapids], where he was to tarry until I overtook him. Took with me my Indian, Boley, and some trifling provision; the Indian and myself marched so fast that we left Boley on the route about eight miles from the lodge.Met Mr. Grant’s men on their return to Lake De Sable,they having evacuated the house this morning, and Mr.Grant having marched [thence] for Leech Lake. TheIndian and I arrived before sundown [at Grant’s house[II-52]].Passed the night very uncomfortably, having nothing to eat,not much wood, nor any blankets. The Indian slept sound.I cursed his insensibility, being obliged to content myself over a few coals all night. Boley did not arrive. In the night the Indian mentioned something about his son, etc.

Monday, Jan. 27th. My Indian rose early, mended his mockinsons, then expressed by signs something about his sonand the Frenchman we met yesterday. Conceiving that he wished to send some message to his family, I suffered him to depart. After his departure I felt the curse of solitude,although he truly was no company. Boley arrived about ten o’clock. He said that he had followed us until some time in the night; when, believing that he could not overtake us, he stopped and made a fire; but having no ax to cut wood, he was near freezing. He met the Indians, who made him signs to go on. I spent the day in putting my gun in order,mending my mockinsons, etc. Provided plenty of wood;still found it cold, with but one blanket.

I can only account for the gentlemen of the N. W. Company contenting themselves in this wilderness for 10, 15,and some of them for 20 years, by the attachment they contract for the Indian women. It appears to me that the wealth of nations would not induce me to remain secluded from the society of civilized mankind, surrounded by a savage and unproductive wilderness, without books or other sources of intellectual enjoyment, or being blessed with the cultivated and feeling mind of a civilized fair [one].

Tuesday, Jan. 28th. [My party joined Boley and myself at Grant’s house to-day. Wednesday, Jan. 29th.[II-53] TookMiller and proceeded ahead of my party; reached Pakagama falls about one o’clock; proceeded to three desertedChipeway lodges; found a fine parcel of firewood split;cut down three sap pines and wove the branches into one of the lodges to protect ourselves from the storm; had a tolerable night. Thursday, Jan. 30th. Miller and myself]left our encampment at a good hour; unable to find any trail, passed through one of the most dismal cypress swampsI ever saw, and struck the Mississippi at a small lake. ObservedMr. Grant’s tracks going through it; found his mark of a cut-off, agreed on between us; took it, and proceeded very well until we came to a small lake where the trail was entirely hid. But after some search on the other side, found it; when we passed through a dismal swamp, on the other side of which we found a large lake at which I was entirely at a loss; no trail was to be seen. Struck a [White Oak[II-54]]point about three miles, where we found a Chipeway lodge of one man, his wife, five children, and one old woman.They received us with every mark that distinguished theirbarbarity, such as setting their dogs on ours, trying to thrust their hands into our pockets, etc. But we convinced them that we were not afraid, and let them know we were Chewockomen[II-55](Americans), when they used us more civilly.

After we had arranged a camp as well as possible, I went into the lodge; they presented me with a plate of dried meat. I ordered Miller to bring about two gills of liquor, which made us all good friends. The old squaw gave me more meat, and offered me tobacco, which, not using, I did not take. I gave her an order upon my corporal for one knife and half a carrot of tobacco. Heaven clothes the lilies and feeds the ravens, and the same almightyProvidence protects and preserves these creatures. After I had gone out to my fire, the old man came out and proposed to trade beaver-skins for whisky; meeting with a refusal, he left me; when presently the old woman came out with a beaver-skin; she also being refused, he returned to the charge with a quantity of dried meat, which, or any other,I should have been glad to have had. I gave him a peremptory refusal; then all further application ceased. It really appeared that with one quart of whisky I might have bought all they possessed. Night remarkably cold; was obliged to sit up nearly the whole of it. Suffered much with cold and from want of sleep.

Friday, Jan. 31st. Took my clothes into the Indian’s lodgeto dress, and was received very coolly; but by giving him adram unasked, and his wife a little salt, I received fromthem directions for my route. Passed the lake or morass,and opened on meadows through which the Mississippiwinds its course of nearly 15 miles long. Took a straightcourse through them to the head, when I found we hadmissed the river; made a turn of about two miles andregained it. Passed a fork which I supposed to be [thatcoming from] Lake Winipie [or Winipeque, i. e., themain Mississippi river coming from Lake Winnibigoshish],making the course N. W. The branch we took was LeechLake branch, course S. W. and W. Passed a very largemeadow or prairie, course W.[II-56] The [Leech Lake branchof the] Mississippi is only 15 yards wide. Encampedabout one mile below the traverse of the meadow.

Saw a very large animal which, from its leaps, I supposed to have been a panther; but if so, it was twice as large as those on the lower Mississippi. He evinced some dispositionto approach. I lay down (Miller being in the rear) in order to entice him to come near, but he would not. The night was remarkably cold. Some spirits which I had in a small keg congealed to the consistency of honey.

CHAPTER III.

ITINERARY, CONCLUDED: LEECH LAKE TO ST. LOUIS,FEBRUARY 1ST-APRIL 30TH, 1806.

Saturday, Feb. 1st. Left our camp pretty early.Passed a continued train of prairie, and arrived atLake La Sang Sue [Leech lake] at half-past two o’clock. I will not attempt to describe my feelings on the accomplishment of my voyage, for this is [what was then mistaken to be] the main source of the Mississippi.[III-1] The Lake Winipiebranch is navigable thence to [Upper] Red Cedar [nowCass] lake, for the distance of five leagues, which is [very far from being] the extremity of the navigation. Crossed the lake 12 miles to the establishment of the N. W. Company,where we arrived about three o’clock [10 o’clock,p. m.]; found all the gates locked, but upon knocking were admitted, and received with marked attention and hospitality by Mr. Hugh M’Gillis. Had a good dish of coffee,biscuit, butter, and cheese for supper.

Sunday, Feb. 2d. Remained all day within doors. In the evening sent an invitation to Mr. [George] Anderson, who was an agent of Dickson, and also for some young Indian sat his house, to come over and breakfast in the morning.

Feb. 3d. Spent the day in reading Volney’s Egypt,[III-2]proposing some queries to Mr. Anderson, and preparing my young man [Miller] to return with a supply of provisions to my party.

Feb. 4th. Miller departed this morning. Mr. Anderson returned to his quarters. My legs and ankles were so much swelled that I was not able to wear my own clothes and was obliged to borrow some from Mr. M’Gillis.

Feb. 5th. One of Mr. M’Gillis’ clerks [Roussand or Boussant[III-3]] had been sent to some Indian lodges and expected to return in four days, but had now been absent nine. Mr. Grant was dispatched in order to find out what had become of him.

Feb. 6th. My men arrived at the fort about four o’clock.[III-4]Mr. M’Gillis asked if I had any objections to his hoisting their [British] flag in compliment to ours. I made none, asI had not yet explained to him my ideas. In making a traverse of the lake, some of my men had their ears, some their noses, and others their chins frozen.

Feb. 7th. Remained within doors, my limbs being still very much swelled. Addressed a letter to Mr. M’Gillis on the subject of the N. W. Company trade in this quarter.[III-5]

Feb. 8th. Took the latitude and found it to be 47° 16´ 13´´.Shot with our rifles.

Sunday, Feb. 9th. Mr. M’Gillis and myself paid a visit toMr. Anderson, an agent of Mr. Dickson of the Lower Mississippi,who resided at the west end of the lake.[III-6] Foundhim eligibly situated as to trade, but his houses bad. I rode in a cariole for one person, constructed in the following manner: Boards planed smooth, turned up in front about two feet, coming to a point, and about 2½ feet wide behind; on which is fixed a box covered with dressed skins painted; this box is open at the top, but covered in front about two-thirds of the length. The horse is fastened between the shafts. The rider wraps himself up in a buffalo-robe and sits flat down, having a cushion to lean his back against. Thus accoutered, with a fur cap, etc., he may bid defiance to the wind and weather. Upon our return we found that some of the Indians had already returned from the hunting-camps; also, Monsieur Roussand [Mr. M’Gillis’clerk of Feb. 5th], the gentleman supposed to have been killed by the Indians. His arrival with Mr. Grant diffused a general satisfaction through the fort.

Feb. 10th. Hoisted the American flag in the fort. TheEnglish yacht [Jack] still flying at the top of the flagstaff,I directed the Indians and my riflemen to shoot at it.They soon broke the iron pin to which it was fastened, and brought it to the ground. Reading Shenstone, etc.

Feb. 11th. The Sweet, Buck, Burnt, etc., arrived, all chiefs of note, but the former in particular, a venerable old man.[III-7] From him I learned that the Sioux occupied thisground when, to use his own phrase, "he was a made man and began to hunt; that they occupied it the year that theFrench missionaries were killed at the river Pacagama."The Indians flocked in.

Feb. 12th. Bradley and myself, with Mr. M’Gillis and two of his men, left Leech Lake at ten o’clock, and arrived at the house at [Upper] Red Cedar [now Cass[III-8]] Lake, atsunset, a distance of 30 miles. My ankles were very muchswelled and I was very lame. From the entrance of theMississippi to the streight is called six miles, S. W. course.Thence to the south end, S. 30 E. four miles. The bay atthe entrance extends nearly E. and W. six miles; it is about2½ from the north side to a large point. This may becalled the upper source of the Mississippi, being 15 miles above Little Lake Winipie [i. e., Lake Winnibigoshish];and the extent of canoe navigation only two leagues to some of the Hudson’s Bay waters.

Feb. 13th. Were favored with a beautiful day. Took the latitude, and found it to be 47° 42´ 40´´ N. At this place itwas that Mr. Thompson[III-9] made his observations in 1798,from which he determined that the source of the Mississippiwas in 47° 38´. I walked about three miles back in the country, at two-thirds water. One of our men marched toLake Winepie [i. e., Lake Winnibigoshish] and returned by one o’clock, for the stem of the Sweet’s pipe, a matter ofmore consequence in his affairs with the Sioux than the diploma of many an ambassador. We feasted on whitefish[Coregonus sp.], roasted on two iron grates fixed horizontally in the back of the chimney; the entrails left in the fish.

Feb. 14th. Left the house at nine o’clock. It becomes me here to do justice to the hospitality of our hosts: oneRoy, a Canadian, and his wife, a Chipeway squaw. They relinquished for our use the only thing in the house that could be called a bed, attended us like servants, nor could either of them be persuaded to touch a mouthful until we had finished our repasts. We made the [Leech Lake] garrison about sundown, having been drawn at least 10 miles in a sleigh by two small dogs. They were loaded with 200 pounds, and went so fast as to render it difficult for the men with snowshoes to keep up with them. The chiefs asked my permission to dance the calumet-dance, which I granted.

Feb. 15th. The Flat Mouth,[III-10] chief of the Leech Lakevillage, and many other Indians arrived. Received a letterfrom Mr. M’Gillis.[III-11] Noted down the heads of my speech,and had it translated into French, in order that the interpreter should be perfectly master of his subject.

Sunday, Feb. 16th. Held a council with the chiefs and warriors of this place and of Red Lake; but it required much patience, coolness, and management to obtain the objects I desired, viz.: That they should make peace with the Sioux; deliver up their [British] medals and flags; and that some of their chiefs should follow me to St. Louis.[III-12]As a proof of their agreeing to the peace, I directed that they should smoke out of the [Sioux chief] Wabasha’s pipe,which lay on the table; they all smoked, from the head chief to the youngest soldier. They generally delivered up their flags with a good grace, except Flat Mouth, who said he had left both at his camp, three days’ march, and promised to deliver them up to Mr. M’Gillis to be forwarded.With respect to their returning with me, old Sweet thought it most proper to return to the Indians of Red lake, Red river, and Rainy Lake river. Flat Mouth said it was necessary for him to restrain his young warriors, etc. The other chiefs did not think themselves of sufficient consequence to offer any reason for not following me to St. Louis, a journeyof between 2,000 and 3,000 miles through hostile tribes ofIndians. I then told them, "that I was sorry to find that the hearts of the Sauteurs of this quarter were so weak;that the other nations would say, ’What! were there no soldier sat Leech, Red, and Rainy Lakes who had the hearts to carry the calumet of their chief to their father — ’" This had the desired effect. The Bucks and Beaux [sic — both pl.],two of the most celebrated young warriors, rose and offered themselves to me for the embassy; they were accepted,adopted as my children, and I was installed their father.Their example animated the others, and it would have been no difficult matter to have taken a company; two, however,were sufficient. I determined that it should be my care never to make them regret the noble confidence placed in me; for I would have protected their lives with my own.Beaux is brother to Flat Mouth. Gave my new soldiers a dance and a small dram. They attempted to get more liquor, but a firm and peremptory denial convinced them I was not to be trifled with.

Feb. 17th. The chief of the land[III-13] brought in his flag and delivered it up. Made arrangements to march my party the next day. Instructed Sweet how to send the parole to the Indians of Red river, etc. Put my men through the manual, and fired three blank rounds, all of which not a little astonished the Indians. I was obliged to give my two new soldiers each a blanket, pair of leggins,scissors, and looking-glass.

Feb. 18th. We[III-14] marched for [Lower] Red Cedar Lake about eleven o’clock, with a guide provided for me by Mr.M’Gillis; were all provided with snowshoes. Marched off amid the acclamations and shouts of the Indians, who generally had remained to see us take our departure. Mr.Anderson promised to come on with letters; he arrived about twelve o’clock and remained all night. He concluded to go down with me to see Mr. Dickson.

Feb. 19th. Bradley, Mr. L’Rone [ — ], the two youngIndians [Buck and Beau], and myself, left Mr. M’Gillis’ at ten o’clock; crossed Leech Lake in a S. E. direction 24 miles. Mr. M’Gillis’ hospitality deserves to be particularly noticed; he presented me with his dogs and cariole, valued in this country at $200. One of the dogs broke out of his harness, and we were not able during that day to catch him again; the other poor fellow was obliged to pull the whole load — at least 150 pounds. This day’s march was from lake to lake.[III-15]

Feb. 20th. I allowed my men to march at least three hours before me; notwithstanding which, as it was cold and the road good, my sleigh dogs brought me ahead of all by one o’clock. Halted for an encampment at half past two o’clock. Our courses this day were S. E. six miles, thenS. 18 miles, almost all the way over lakes, some of which were six miles across. Encamped on the bank of a lake called Sandy Lake.[III-16] Indians were out hunting.

Feb. 21st. Traveled this day generally S. Passed but two lakes; Sandy Lake, which is of an oblong form, N. andS. four miles, and one other small one. The Indians, at the instigation of Mr. L’Rone, applied for him to accompany us. I consented that he should go as far as [Lower] RedCedar Lake. I then wrote a note to M’Gillis upon the occasion.After Reale had departed with it, L’Rone disclosed to me that it was his wish to desert the N. W. Company entirely, and accompany me. To have countenanced for a moment anything of this kind, I conceived would have been inconsistent with every principle of honor; I therefore obliged him to return immediately. We then had no guide,our Indians not knowing the road. Our course was through woods and bad brush, 15 miles.

Feb. 22d. Our course a little to the S. of E., through woods not very thick. Arrived at White Fish Lake[III-17] at eleven o’clock, and took an observation. My party crossed this lake and encamped between two lakes. This may be called the source of Pine river. At this place has been one of the N. W. Company’s establishments at the N. E. andS. side. It was a square stockade of about 50 feet, but at this time nearly all consumed by fire. Also one standing over the point on the E. side.

Sunday, Feb. 23d. My two Indians, Boley, and myself,with my sleigh and dogs, left the party under an idea that we should make [Lower] Red Cedar lake. We marched hard all day, without arriving at the Mississippi. Our coursewas nearly due east until near night, when we changed more south. Took no provision or bedding. My Indians killed 15 partridges, some nearly black, with a red mark over their eyes, called the savanna partridge [Canada grouse or spruce partridge, Dendragapus canadensis]. Overtaken about noon by two of Mr. Anderson’s men, named Brurie and[Blank], Mr. Anderson himself not being able to come.Distance 30 miles.

Feb. 24th. We started early, and after passing over one of the worst roads in the world, found ourselves on a lake about three o’clock; took its outlet [Dean creek] and struck the Mississippi about one mile below the [Chippewa]canoes mentioned on Jan. 1st, by which I knew where we were. Ascended the Mississippi about four miles, and encamped on the west side [about the mouth of Hay creek[III-18]].Our general course this day was nearly S., when it shouldhave been S. E. My young warriors were still in good heart, singing and showing every wish to keep me so. The pressure of my racket-strings brought the blood through my socks and mockinsons, from which the pain I marched in may be imagined.

Feb. 25th. We marched and arrived at [Lower Red] Cedar lake before noon; found Mr. Grant and De Breche, chief ofSandy lake [Chippewas[III-19]] at the house. This gave me much pleasure, for I conceive Mr. Grant to be a gentleman of as much candor as any with whom I made an acquaintance in this quarter, and the chief, De Breche, is reputed to be a man of better information than any [other] of the Sauteurs.

Feb. 26th. Sent one of Mr. Grant’s men down with a bag of rice to meet my people; he found them encamped onthe Mississippi. Wrote a letter[III-20] to Mr. Dickson on the subject of the Fols Avoins [Folle Avoine or MenomoneeIndians]; also, some orders to my sergeant [Kennerman, at the stockade on Swan river]. This evening I had a long conversation with De Breche; he informed me that a string of wampum had been sent among the Chipeways, he thought by the British commanding officer at St. Joseph. He appeared to be a very intelligent man.

Feb. 27th. The chief called the White Fisher and sevenIndians arrived at the house. My men also arrived about twelve o’clock.

Feb. 28th. We left [Lower] Red Cedar lake about eleveno’clock, and went to where the canoes were [near Deancreek], mentioned in my journal of Jan. 1st. My young Indians[Buck and Beau] remained behind under the pretense of waiting for the chief De Breche, who returned to SandyLake for his [British] flag and medals, and was to render himself at my post with Mr. Grant about the 15th of the following month.

Mar. 1st. Departed early. Passed our encampment ofDec. 31st at nine o’clock. Passed Pine river at twelve o’clock. Passed our encampment of Dec. 30th at three o’clock. Passed our encampment of Dec. 29th just before we came to our present, which we made on the point of thePine Ridge below. Distance 43 miles.[III-21]

Sunday, Mar. 2d. Passed our encampment of Dec. 28 that ten o’clock, that of Dec. 27th at one o’clock, and encamped at that of Dec. 26th [Brainerd]. Found wood nearly sufficient for our use. This morning dispatched Bradley to the last place we had buried a barrel of flour [Dec. 20th, a short distance below Crow Wing river], to thaw the ground and hunt. This day a party of Indians struck the river behindBradley and before us, but left it 10 miles above Raven[Crow Wing] river.

Mar. 3d. Marched early; passed our Christmas encampment at sunrise. I was ahead of my party in my cariole.Soon afterward I observed a smoke on the W. shore.I hallooed, and some Indians appeared on the bank. I waited until my interpreter came up; we then went to the camp. They proved to be a party of Chipeways, who had left the encampment the same day we left it. They presented me with some roast meat, which I gave my sleigh dogs. They then left their camp and accompanied us down the river. We passed our encampment of Dec. 24that nine o’clock, of the 23d at ten o’clock, and of the 22d at eleven o’clock; here the Indians crossed over to the W.shore; arrived at the encampment of Dec. 21st at twelve o’clock, where we had a barrel of flour [cached Dec. 20th,short of Crow Wing river].

I here found Corporal Meek and another man from the post [on Swan river], from whom I heard that the men were all well; they confirmed the account of a Sioux having fired on a sentinel; and added that the sentinel had first made him drunk and then turned him out of the tent; upon which he fired on the sentinel and ran off, but promised to deliver himself up in the spring. The corporal informed me that the sergeant [Kennerman] had used all the elegant hams and saddles of venison which I had preserved to present to the commander-in-chief and other friends; that he had made away with all the whisky, including a keg I had for my own use, having publicly sold it to the men, and a barrel of pork; that he had broken open my trunk and sold some things out of it, traded with the Indians, gave them liquor, etc.; and this, too, contrary to my most pointed and particular directions. Thus, after I had used in going up the river with my party the strictest economy,living upon two pounds of frozen venison a day, in order that we might have provision to carry us down in the spring,this fellow was squandering the flour, pork, and liquor during the winter, while we were starving with hunger and cold. I had saved all our corn, bacon, and the meat of six deer, and left it at Sandy Lake, with some tents, my mess-boxes,salt, tobacco, etc., all of which we were obliged to sacrifice by not returning the same route we went; we had consoled ourselves at this loss by the flattering idea that we should find at our little post a handsome stock preserved — how mortifying the disappointment!

We raised our barrel of flour and came down to the mouth of the little [Nokasippi] river, on the E., which we had passed on Dec. 21st. The ice covered with water.

Mar. 4th. Proceeded early. Passed our encampment ofDec. 20th at sunrise. Arrived at that of the 19th [read 17th] at nine o’clock; here we had buried two barrels.[III-22]Made a large fire to thaw the ground. Went on the prairie and found Sparks, one of my hunters, and brought him to the river at the Pine Camp [of Dec. 14th, 15th, 16th, vicinity of Olmsted’s bar]. Passed on opposite our encampment of Dec. 13th [at or near Topeka], and encamped whereSparks and some men had an old hunting-camp, and whereFresaie, a Chipeway chief, surrounded them.

Mar. 5th. Passed all the encampments [Dec. 12th, 11th,10th, 9th] between Pine creek and the post, at which we arrived about ten o’clock.[III-23] I sent a man on ahead toprevent the salute I had before ordered by letter [of Feb.28th]; this I had done from the idea that the Sioux chiefs would accompany me. Found all well. Confined my sergeant.About one o’clock Mr. Dickson arrived, with KilleurRouge, his son, and two other Sioux men, with two women who had come up to be introduced to the Sauteurs they expected to find with me. Received a letter from[Joseph] Reinville.

Mar. 6th. Thomas [Carron[III-24]], the Fols Avoin’s first chief, arrived with ten others of his nation. I made a serious and authoritative expostulative representation to him of my opinion of the conduct of Shawonoe, another chief of his nation, who had behaved ill. Had also a conference with Killeur Rouge and his people. At night wrote to Messrs. Grant, M’Gillis, and Anderson.

Mar. 7th. Held conversations with the Indians. Thomas[Carron], the Fols Avoin chief, assured me that he would interest himself in obliging the Puants to deliver up the men who had recently committed murders on the Ouiscousing and Rock rivers; and if necessary he would make it a national quarrel, on the side of the Americans. ThisThomas is a fine fellow, of a very masculine figure, noble and animated delivery, and appears to be very much attached to the Americans. The Sioux informed me that they would wait until I had determined my affairs in this country, and then bear my words to the St. Peters.

Mar. 8th. The Fols Avoin chief presented me with his pipe to give to the Sauteurs on their arrival, with assurances of their safety on their voyage, and his wish for them to descend the river. The Fils de Killeur Rouge also presented me with his pipe to present to the Sauteur Indians on theirarrival, to make them smoke, and assure them of his friendly disposition, and that he would wait to see them at Mr.Dickson’s. Thomas made a formal complaint against aFrenchman, by name Greignor,[III-25] who resided in Green bay,and who he said abused the Indians, beat them, etc., without provocation. I promised to write to the commanding officer or Indian agent at Michilimackinac upon the occasion.The Indians with Mr. Dickson all took their departure.Hitched my dogs in the sleigh, which drew one of theIndian women down the ice, to the no little amusement of the others. Went some distance down the river in order to cut a mast. Cut a pine mast 35 feet long for my big boat at the prairie [Prairie du Chien]. This day my little boy broke the cock of my gun; few trifling misfortunes could have happened which I should have regretted more, as the wild fowl just began to return on the approach of spring.

Sunday, Mar. 9th. I examined into the conduct of my sergeant, and found that he was guilty; punished him by reduction, etc. Visited the Fols Avoin lodges and received a present of some tallow. One of my men arrived from the hunting-camp with two deer.

Mar. 10th. Was visited by the Fols Avoin chief and several others of his nation. This chief was an extraordinary hunter; to instance his power, he killed 40 elk and a bear in one day, chasing the former from dawn to eve. We were all busied in preparing oars, guns, mast, etc., by the time the ice broke up, which was opening fast.

Mar. 11th. In a long conversation with a Reynard, he professed not to believe in an hereafter; but he believed that the world would all be drowned by water at some future period; he asked how it was to be repeopled. In justice tohis nation, however, I must observe that his opinion was singular.[III-26]

Mar. 12th. Made preparations; had a fine chase with deer on the ice; killed one. Since our return I have received eight deer from our camp.

Mar. 13th. Received two deer from my hunting-camp.Went out with my gun on the opposite side of the river.Ascended the mountain which borders the prairie. On the point of it I found a stone on which the Indians had sharpened their knives, and a war-club half finished. From this spot you may extend the eye over vast prairies with scarcely any interruption but clumps of trees, which at a distance appeared like mountains, from two or three of which the smoke rising in the air denoted the habitation of the wandering savage, and too often marked them out as victims to their enemies; from whose cruelty I have had the pleasure in the course of the winter and through a wilderness of immense extent to relieve them, as peace has reigned through my mediation from the prairie Des Cheins to the lower Red river. If a subaltern with but 20 men, at so great a distance from the seat of his government, could effect so important a change in the minds of those savages,what might not a great and independent power effect, if,instead of blowing up the flames of discord, they exerted their influence in the sacred cause of peace —

When I returned to the fort, I found the Fols Avoinchief, who intended to remain all night. He told me that near the conclusion of the Revolutionary War his nation began to look upon him as a warrior; that they received a parole from Michilimackinac, on which he was dispatched with 40 warriors; and that on his arrival he was requested to lead them against the Americans. To which he replied:"We have considered you and the Americans as one people.You are now at war; how are we to decide who has justice on their side — Besides, you white people are like the leaves on the trees for numbers. Should I march with my 40 warriors to the field of battle, they with their chief would be unnoticed in the multitude, and would be swallowed up as the big water embosoms the small rivulets which discharge themselves into it. No, I will return to my nation, where my countrymen may be of service against our red enemies, and their actions renowned in the dance of our nation."

Mar. 14th. Took the latitude by an artificial horizon,and measured the river. Received one deer and a half from my hunting-camp. Ice thinner.

Mar. 15th. This was the day fixed upon by Mr. Grant and the Chipeway warriors for their arrival at my fort. I was all day anxiously expecting them, for I knew that should they not accompany me down, the peace partially effected between them and the Sioux would not be on a permanent footing. Upon this I take them to be neither so brave or generous as the Sioux, who in all their transactions appear to be candid and brave, whereas the Chipeways are suspicious, consequently treacherous and of course cowards.

Sunday, Mar. 16th. Received three deer from our hunting-camp.Examined trees for canoes.

Mar. 17th. Left the fort with my interpreter [Rousseau]and [Private Alexander] Roy, in order to visit Thomas, theFols Avoin chief, who was encamped, with six lodges of his nation, about 20 miles below us, on a little [Wolf creek ofPike, now Spunk] river which empties into the Mississippi on the W. side, a little above Clear river [of Pike, now thePlatte]. On our way down killed one goose, wounded another, and a deer that the dogs had driven into an air-hole;hung our game on the trees. Arrived at the creek;took out on it; ascended three or four miles on one bank,and descended on the other [missing Carron’s camp both ways]. Killed another goose. Struck the Mississippi below[Spunk river]. Encamped at our encampment of the [13th]of October, when we ascended the river. Ate our goose for supper. It snowed all day, and at night a very severe storm arose. It may be imagined that we spent a very disagreeable night without shelter, and but one blanket each.

Mar. 18th. We marched [up Spunk river], determined to find the [Menomonee] lodges. Met an Indian whose track we pursued through almost impenetrable woods for about 2½ miles to the camp. Here there was one of the finest sugar-camps I almost ever saw, the whole of the timber being sugar-tree. We were conducted to the chief’s lodge,who received us in patriarchal style. He pulled off myleggings and mockinsons, put me in the best place in his lodge, and offered me dry clothes. He then presented us with syrup of the maple to drink, and asked whether I preferred eating beaver, swan, elk, or deer; upon my giving the preference to the first, a large kettle was filled by his wife,in which soup was made; this being thickened with flour, we had what I then thought a delicious repast. After we had refreshed ourselves, he asked whether we would visit his people at the other lodges, which we did, and in each were presented with something to eat; by some, with a bowl of sugar; by others, a beaver’s tail, etc. After making this tour we returned to the chief’s lodge, and found a berth provided for each of us, of good soft bearskins nicely spread,and on mine there was a large feather pillow.

I must not here omit to mention an anecdote which serves to characterize more particularly their manners.This in the eyes of the contracted moralist would deform my hospitable host into a monster of libertinism; but by a liberal mind would be considered as arising from the hearty generosity of the wild savage. In the course of the day, observing a ring on one of my fingers, he inquired if It was gold; he was told it was the gift of one with whomI should be happy to be at that time; he seemed to think seriously, and at night told my interpreter, "That perhaps his father" (as they all called me) "felt much grieved for the want of a woman; if so, he could furnish him with one."He was answered that with us each man had but one wife,and that I considered it strictly my duty to remain faithful to her. This he thought strange, he himself having three,and replied that "He knew some Americans at his nation who had half a dozen wives during the winter." The interpreter observed that they were men without character; but that all our great men had each but one wife. The chiefacquiesced, but said he liked better to have as many as he pleased. This conversation passing without any appeal tome, as the interpreter knew my mind on those occasions and answered immediately, it did not appear as an immediaterefusal of the woman. Continued snowing very hard all day. Slept very warm.

Mar. 19th. This morning purchased two baskets of sugar, for the amount of which I gave orders on Mr. Dickson.After feasting upon a swan, took our leave for [theSwan river] camp; still snowing. Finding my two companions[the interpreter and Private Roy] unable to keep up, I pushed on and arrived at the [Mississippi] river.When I arrived at the place where I had hung up my first goose [Mar. 17th], I found that the ravens and eagles had not left a feather; and feasting upon the deer was a band sufficient to have carried it away, which had picked its bones nearly clean; what remained I gave my dogs. Stopped at the place where I expected to find the last goose, but could see nothing of it; at length I found it hid under the grass and snow, where some animal had concealed it, after eating off its head and neck. I carried it to the fort, whereI arrived about an hour before sundown. Dispatched immediately two men with rackets to meet the interpreter and Le Roy [Private A. Roy]. They arrived about two hours after dark. Some men also arrived at [from — ] the hunting-camp with three deer. The snow ceased falling about one hour after dark; it was nearly two feet deep on a level, the deepest that had fallen so low down this winter.

Mar. 20th. Dispatched nine men to my hunting-camp,whence received two deer. Cloudy almost all day; but the water rose fast over the ice.

Mar. 21st. Received a visit from the Fols Avoin chief called the Shawonoe, and six young men. I informed him without reserve of the news I had heard of him at [Lower]Red Cedar Lake, and the letter I wrote to Mr. Dickson.He denied it in to to, and on the contrary said that he presented his flag and two medals to the Chipeways, as an inducement for them to descend in the spring; and gave them all the encouragement in his power. His party was much astonished at the language I held with him. But from his firm protestations we finally parted friends. Heinformed me that a camp of Sauteurs were on the river,waiting for the chiefs to come down; from which it appeared they were still expected. At night, after the others had gone, Thomas arrived and stayed all night. We agreed upon a hunting-party; also promised to pay old Shawonoea visit. He informed me that he set out the other day to follow me, but finding the storm so very bad returned to his wigwam. The thermometer lower than it has been at any time since I commenced my voyage.

Mar. 22d. Ten of my men arrived from the hunting-camp with 4½ deer. Thomas departed; I sent a man with him to his camps, from which he sent me two beavers.

Sunday, Mar. 23d. Agreeably to promise, after breakfastI departed with Miller and my interpreter to pay a visit to the old chief Shawonoe. We arrived at his camp in about two hours. On our way we met the Fols Avoin calledChein Blanche [Chien Blanc], who had visited my post[Dec. 7th] previously to my starting up the river, and at whose house we stopped when passing. We were received by old Shawonoe at his lodge with the usual Indian hospitality,but very different from the polite reception given us by Thomas.

Charlevoix and others have all borne testimony to the beauty of this nation. From my own observation, I had sufficient reason to confirm their information as respected the males; for they were all straight and well-made, about the middle size; their complexions generally fair for savages, their teeth good, their eyes large and rather languishing;they have a mild but independent expression of countenance, that charms at first sight; in short, they would be considered anywhere as handsome men. But their account of the women I never before believed to be correct.In this lodge there were five very handsome women when we arrived; and about sundown a married pair arrived,whom my interpreter observed were the handsomest couple he knew; and in truth they were, the man being about 5 feet 11 inches, and possessing in an eminent manner allthe beauties of countenance which distinguish his nation.His companion was 22 years old, having dark brown eyes,jet hair, an elegantly proportioned neck, and her figure by no means inclined to corpulency, as they generally are after marriage. He appeared to attach himself particularly tome, and informed that his wife was the daughter of anAmerican who, passing through the nation about 23 years before, remained a week or two possessed of her mother,and that she was the fruit of this amour; but his name they were unacquainted with. I had brought six biscuits with me, which I presented her on the score of her being my countrywoman; this raised a loud laugh, and she was called "the Bostonian"[III-27] during the rest of my stay.

I found them generally extremely hard to deal with.My provision being only a little venison, I wished to procure some bear’s oil, for a few gallons of which I was obliged to pay $1 per gallon, and then they wanted to mix tallow with the oil. They also demanded $10 for a bearskin,the most beautiful I ever saw, which I wanted to mount a saddle. Indeed I was informed that traders in this country sometimes give as much as $16 [apiece] for bearskins, for they are eminently superior to anything of the kind on the lower Mississippi, and sell in Europe for double the price.In the evening we were entertained with the calumet and dog dance; also the dance of the — — . Some of the men struck the post and told some of their war exploits;but as they spoke in Menomene, my interpreter could not explain it. After the dance, we had the feast of the dead,as it is called, at which each two or three were served with a pan or vessel full of meat, and when all were ready there was a prayer, after which the eating commenced. Then it was expected we should eat up our portion entirely, being careful not to drop a bone, but to gather all up and put them in the dish. We were then treated with soup. After the eating was finished the chief again gave an exhortation,which finished the ceremony. I am told they then gather up all the fragments, and throw them in the water, lest the dogs should get them. Burning them is considered as sacrilegious. In this lodge were collected at one time 41 persons, great and small, 17 of whom were capable of bearing arms, besides dogs without number.

Mar. 24th. Rose early and with my dog-sled arrived at the fort before ten o’clock. In the afternoon Mr. Grant arrived with De Breche [Brèche-dent] and some of his young men. Saluted him with 14 rounds. Found my two young warriors [Buck and Beau] of Leech Lake were brave enough to return to their homes. Mr. Grant and myself sat up late talking.

Mar. 25th. Sent an Indian to Thomas’ lodge, and a letter to Mr. Dickson. It snowed and stormed all day. Gave the chief the news.

Mar. 26th. Thomas, the Fols Avoin chief, arrived with seven of his men, and old Shawonoe and six of his party. I had them all to feed as well as my own men. At night I gave them leave to dance in the garrison, which they did until ten o’clock; but once or twice told me that if I was tired of them the dance should cease. Old Shawonoe andWhite Dog [Chien Blanc] of the Fols Avoins told their exploits,which we could not understand; but De Breche arose and said, "I once killed a Sioux and cut off his head with such a spear as I now present to this Winebago" — at the same time presenting one to a Winebago present, with whom the Chipeways were at war; this was considered by the former as a great honor. My hunters went out but killed nothing.

Mar. 27th. In the morning the Chipeway chief made a speech and presented his peace pipe to me to bear to theSioux, on which were seven strings of wampum, as authority from seven bands of the Chipeways either to conclude peace or to make war. As he had chosen the former, he sent his pipe to the Sioux and requested me to inform them that he and his people would encamp at the mouth of theRiviere De Corbeau the ensuing summer, where he would see the United States flag flying. As a proof of his pacific disposition, the Fols Avoin chief then spoke and said: "His nation was rendered small by its enemies; only a remnant was left, but they could boast of not being slaves; for that always in preference to their women and children being taken, they themselves killed them. But that their father(as they called me) had traveled far, and had taken much pains to prevent the Sioux and Chipeways from killing one another; that he thought none could be so ungenerous as to neglect listening to the words of their father; that he would report to the Sioux the pacific disposition of the Sauteurs,and hoped the peace would be firm and lasting." I then ina few words informed De Breche "that I would report tothe Sioux all he had said, and that I should ever feelpleased and grateful that the two nations had laid aside the tomahawk at my request. That I thanked the Fols Avoin chief for his good wishes and parole which he had given theSauteurs." After all this, each chief was furnished with a kettle of liquor, to drink each other’s health; and DeBreche’s flag which I had presented him was displayed in the fort. The Fols Avoins then departed, at which I was by no means displeased; for they had already consumed all the dry meat I had laid aside for my voyage, and I was apprehensive that my hunters would not be able to lay up another supply.

Mar. 28th. Late in the afternoon Mr. Grant and theSauteurs took their departure, calculating that the Sioux had left the country. Took with me one of my soldiers and accompanied them to the Fols Avoins lodge, called theShawonese, where we ten stayed all night. The Fols Avoins and Sauteurs had a dance, at which I left them and went to sleep. Feasted on elk, sugar, and syrup. Previously to the Indians’ departing from my post, I demanded the chief’s medal and flags; the former he delivered, but with a bad grace; the latter he said were in the lands when I leftLake De Sable (as instructed by the traders I suppose), and that he could not obtain them. It thundered and lightened.

Mar. 29th. We all marched in the morning, Mr. Grant and party for Sandy Lake, and I for my hunting-camp. I gave him my spaniel dog. He joined me again after we had separated about five miles. Arrived at my hunting-camp about eight o’clock in the morning, and was informed that my hunters had gone to bring in a deer; they arrived with it, and about eleven o’clock we all went out hunting.Saw but few deer, out of which I had the good fortune to kill two. On our arrival at camp found one of my men at the garrison with a letter from Mr. Dickson. The soldier informed me that one Sioux had arrived with Mr. Dickson’s men. Although much fatigued, as soon as I had eaten somethingI took one of my men and departed for the garrison one hour before sundown. The distance was 21 miles, and the ice very dangerous, being rotten, with water over it nearly a foot deep; we had sticks in our hands, and in many places ran them through the ice. It thundered and lightened,with rain. The Sioux, not finding the Sauteurs, had returned immediately.

Sunday, Mar. 30th. Wrote to Mr. Dickson, and dispatched his man. Considerably stiff from my yesterday’s march. Calked our boats, as the ice had every appearance of breaking up in a few days. Thus while on the wing of eager expectation, every day seemed an age. Received 2½deer from our hunting-camp.

Mar. 31st. Finished calking my boats; the difficulty then was with me, what I should get to pitch the seams.We were all this day and next as anxiously watching the ice as a lover would the arrival of the priest who was tounite him to his beloved. Sometimes it moved a little, but soon closed. An Indian and his woman crossed it when the poles which they held in their hands were forced through in many places. The provision to which I was obliged to restrict myself and men, viz., two pounds of fresh venison per day, was scarcely sufficient to keep us alive. Though I had not an extraordinary appetite, yet I was continually hungry.

[Apr. 1st. No entry.]

Apr. 2d. Went out and killed one deer and two partridges.The ice began to move opposite the fort at the foot of the rapids, but dammed up below. Received half a dozen bears from my hunting-camp. Launched our canoe and brought her down.

Apr. 3d. Sent one man down to see the river, another to the camp, and took two men myself over the hills on the other side of the Mississippi to hunt. In the course of the day I killed a swan and a goose, and we certainly would have killed one or two elk had it not been for the sleigh-dogs;for we lay concealed on the banks of Clear river when four came and threw themselves into it opposite, and were swimming directly to us when our dogs bounced into the water, and they turned. We then fired on them, but they carried off all the lead we gave them, and we could not cross the river unless we rafted (it being bank-full), which would have detained us too long a time. In the evening it became very cold, and we passed rather an uncomfortable night.

Apr. 4th. Took our course home. I killed one large buck and wounded another. We made a fire and ate breakfast.Arrived at the fort at two o’clock. Was informed that the river was still shut below, at the cluster of [Beltrami’sArchipelago, Pike’s Beaver, and now the Thousand]islands. Received some bear-meat and one deer from the camp.

Apr. 5th. In the morning dispatched two men down the river in order to see if it was open. My hunters arrived from the camps. Tallowed my boats with our candles andlaunched them; they made considerable water. The young[son of] Shawonoe arrived in my canoe from above, with about 1,000 lbs. of fur, which he deposited in the fort. The men returned and informed me that the river was still shut about 10 miles below.

Sunday, Apr. 6th. Sailed my peroque with SergeantBradley [promoted, vice Kennerman reduced] and two men,to descend the river and see if it was yet open below. They returned in the afternoon and reported all clear. I had previously determined to load and embark the next day, and hoped to find it free by the time I arrived. The Fols Avoincalled the Shawonoe arrived and encamped near the stockade.He informed me that his nation had determined to send his son down in his place, as he declined the voyage toSt. Louis. All hearts and hands were employed in preparing for our departure. In the evening the men cleared out their room, danced to the violin, and sang songs until eleven o’clock,so rejoiced was every heart at leaving this savage wilderness.

Apr. 7th. Loaded our boats and departed at 40 minutes past ten o’clock. At one o’clock arrived at Clear river,where we found my canoe and men. Although I had partly promised the Fols Avoin chief to remain one night, yet time was too precious, and we put off; passed the Grand [Sauk]Rapids, and arrived at Mr. Dickson’s[III-28] just before sun-down.We were saluted with three rounds. At night he treated allmy men with a supper and a dram. Mr. Dickson, Mr.Paulier, and myself sat up until four o’clock in the morning.

Apr. 8th. Were obliged to remain this day on account of some information to be obtained here. I spent the day in making a rough chart of St. Peters, notes on the Sioux, etc.,and settling the affairs of the Indian department with Mr.Dickson, for whose communications and those of Mr. PaulierI am infinitely indebted. Made every necessary preparation for an early embarkation.

Apr. 9th. Rose early in the morning and commenced my arrangements. Having observed two Indians drunk during the night, and finding upon inquiry that the liquor had been furnished by a Mr. Greignor or Jennesse [La Jeunesse], I sent my interpreter to them to request they would not sell any strong drink to the Indians; upon which Mr. Jennesse demanded the restrictions in writing, which were given to him.[III-29]On demanding his license it amounted to no more than merely a certificate that he had paid the tax required by a law of the Indiana territory on all retailers of merchandise,and was by no means an Indian license; however, I did not think proper to go into a more close investigation. Last night was so cold that the water was covered with floating cakes of ice, of a strong consistence. After receiving every mark of attention from Messrs. Dickson and Paulier, I took my departure at eight o’clock. At 4 p. m. arrived at the house of Mr. Paulier, 25 leagues, to whose brother I had a letter. Was received with politeness by him and a Mr.Veau [Vean of 1807 text, p. 56] who had wintered alongside of him, on the very island at which we had encamped on the night of the [4th — ] of October in ascending.

After having left this place some time, we discovered a bark canoe ahead; we gained on it for some time, when it turned a point about 300 yards before, and on our turning it also, it had entirely disappeared. This excited my curiosity;I stood up in the barge, and at last discovered it turned up in the grass of the prairie; but after we had passed a good gunshot, three savages made their appearance from under it,launched it in the river, and followed, not knowing of my other boats, which had just turned the point immediately upon them. They then came on; and on my stopping for the night at a vacant trading-house, they also stopped, and addressed me, "Saggo, Commandant," or "Your servant,Captain." I directed my interpreter to inquire their motives for concealing themselves. They replied that their canoe leaked, and that they had turned her up to discharge the water. This I did not believe; and as their conduct was equivocal I received them rather sternly; I gave them, however,a small dram and piece of bread. They then re-embarked and continued down the river.

Their conduct brought to mind the visit of Fils de Pinchow to Mr. Dickson, during the winter; one principal cause of which was that he wished to inform me that the seven men, whom I mentioned to have met [Sept. 28th]when crossing the portage of St. Anthony, had since declared that they would kill him for agreeing to the peace between the Sioux and the Sauteurs; me for being instrumentalin preventing them from taking their revenge for relations killed by Sauteurs in August, 1805; and Thomas,the Fols Avoin chief, for the support he seemed disposed to give me. This information had not made the impression it ought to have made, coming from so respectable a source as the first chief of the village; but the conduct of those fellows put me to the consideration of it. And I appeal toGod and my country, if self-preservation would not have justified me in cutting those scoundrels to pieces whereverI found them — This my men would have done, if ordered,amid a thousand of them, and I should have been supported by the chiefs of the St. Peters, at the mouth of which were 300 warriors, attending my arrival; also [I should have been justified in cutting to pieces], the rascal who fired on my sentinel last winter [see Mar. 3d, p. 178]. I dreaded the consequences of the meeting, not for the present, but for fear the impetuosity of my conduct might not be approved of by my government, which did not so intimately know the nature of those savages.

This day, for the first time, we saw the commencement of vegetation; yet the snow was a foot deep in some places.

Apr. 10th. Sailed at half past five o’clock; about seven passed Rum river, and at eight were saluted by six or seven lodges of Fols Avoins, among whom was a Mr. [Blank],a clerk of Mr. Dickson’s. Those people had wintered onRum river, and were waiting for their chiefs and traders to descend in order to accompany them to the Prairie DesChiens. Arrived at the Falls of St. Anthony at ten o’clock.Carried over all our lading and the canoe to the lower end of the portage, and hauled our boats up on the bank. I pitched my tents at the lower end of the encampment,where all the men encamped except the guard, whose quarters were above.

The appearance of the Falls was much more tremendous than when we ascended; the increase of water occasioned the spray to rise much higher, and the mist appeared likeclouds. How different my sensations now, from what theywere when at this place before! At that time, not having accomplished more than half my route, winter fast approaching,war existing between the most savage nations in the course of my route, my provisions greatly diminished and but a poor prospect of an additional supply, many of my men sick and the others not a little disheartened, our success in this arduous undertaking very doubtful, just upon the borders of the haunts of civilized men, about to launch into an unknown wilderness — for ours was the first canoe that had ever crossed this portage — were reasons sufficient to dispossess my breast of contentment and ease. But now we have accomplished every wish, peace reigns throughout the vast extent, we have returned thus far on our voyage without the loss of a single man, and hope soon to be blessed with the society of our relations and friends.

The river this morning was covered with ice, which continued floating all day; the shores were still barricaded with it.

Apr. 11th. Although it snowed very hard, we brought over both boats and descended the river to the [Pike’s] island at the entrance of the St. Peters. I sent to the chiefs and informed them I had something to communicate to them.Fils de Pinchow immediately waited on me, and informed me that he would provide a place for the purpose. About sundown I was sent for and introduced into the council-house,where I found a great many chiefs of the Sussitongs,Gens des Feuilles, and Gens du Lac. The Yanctongs had not yet come down. They were all waiting for my arrival.There were about 100 lodges, or 600 people; we were saluted on our crossing the river with ball, as usual. The council-house was two large lodges, capable of containing 300 men.In the upper were 40 chiefs, and as many pipes set against the poles, alongside of which I had the Sauteur’s pipes arranged. I then informed them in short detail of my transactions with the Sauteurs; but my interpreters were not capable of making themselves understood. I was thereforeobliged to omit mentioning every particular relative to therascal who fired on my sentinel, and to the scoundrel who broke the Fols Avoins’ canoes and threatened my life. The interpreters, however, informed them that I wanted some of their principal chiefs to go to St. Louis; and that those who thought proper might descend to the prairie [Prairie duChien], where we would give them more explicit information.They all smoked out of the Sauteurs’ pipes, excepting three, who were painted black and who were some of those who lost their relations last winter. I invited Fils de Pinchow and the son of Killeur Rouge to come over and sup with me; when Mr. Dickson and myself endeavored to explain what I intended to have said to them, could I have made myself understood; that at the Prairie we would have all things explained; that I was desirous of making a better report of them than Capt. [Meriwether] Lewis could do from their treatment of him. The former of those savages was the person who remained around my post all last winter,and treated my men so well; they endeavored to excuse their people, etc.

Apr. 12th. Embarked early. Although my interpreter had been frequently up the river, he could not tell me where the cave spoken of by Carver could be found; we carefully sought for it, but in vain.[III-30] At the Indian village a fewmiles above [read below: see note72, p. 74] St. Peters we were about to pass a few lodges, but on receiving a very particular invitation to come on shore, we landed and were received in a lodge kindly; they presented us sugar, etc. I gave the proprietor a dram, and was about to depart, when he demanded a kettle of liquor; on being refused, and afterI had left the shore, he told me that he did not like the arrangements and that he would go to war this summer. I directed the interpreter to tell him that if I returned to theSt. Peters with the troops I would settle that affair with him. On our arrival at the St. Croix, I found Petit Corbeau[Little Raven: see note2, p. 85] with his people, andMessrs. Frazer and Wood. We had a conference, whenPetit Corbeau made many apologies for the misconduct of his people; he represented to us the different manners inwhich his young warriors had been inducing him to go to war; that he had been much blamed for dismissing his party last fall, but that he was determined to adhere as far as lay in his power to our instructions; that he thought it most prudent to remain here and restrain the warriors. He then presented me with a beaver robe and pipe, and his message to the general, that he was determined to preserve peace,and make the road clear; also, a remembrance of his promised medal. I made him a reply calculated to confirm him in his good intentions, and assured him that he should not be the less remembered by his father, although not present.

I was informed that not withstanding the instruction of his license and my particular request, Murdoch Cameron[see note64, p. 66] had taken liquor and sold it to the Indians on the river St. Peters, and that his partner below had been equally imprudent. I pledged myself to prosecute them according to law; for they have been the occasion of great confusion and of much injury to the other traders.

This day we met a canoe of Mr. Dickson’s loaded with provision, under the charge of Mr. Anderson, brother ofMr. [George] Anderson at Leech Lake. He politely offered me any provision he had on board, for which Mr. Dickson had given me an order; but not now being in want I did not accept of any. This day, for the first time, I observed the trees beginning to bud, and indeed the climate seemed to have changed very materially since we passed the Falls of St. Anthony.

Sunday, Apr. 13th. We embarked after breakfast.Messrs. Frazer and Wood accompanied me. Wind strong ahead. They out rowed us — the first boat or canoe we met with on the voyage able to do it; but then they were double-manned and light. Arrived at the band of AileRouge [Red Wing: see note67, p. 69] at two o’clock, where we were saluted as usual.

We had a council, when he spoke with more detestation of the conduct of the rascals at the mouth of the St. Peters than any man I had yet heard. He assured me, speakingof the fellow who had fired on my sentinel and threatened to kill me, that if I thought it requisite, he should be killed;but as there were many chiefs above with whom he wished to speak, he hoped I would remain one day, when all theSioux would be down, and I might have the command of a thousand men of them; that I would probably think it no honor, but that the British used to flatter them they were proud of having them for soldiers. I replied in general terms, and assured him it was not for the conduct of two or three rascals that I meant to pass over all the good treatment I had received from the Sioux nation; but that in general council I would explain myself. That as to the scoundrel who fired at my sentinel, had I been at home the Sioux nation would never have been troubled with him, for I would have killed him on the spot; but that my young men did not do it, apprehensive that I would be displeased.I then gave him the news of the Sauteurs, etc.;that as to remaining one day, it would be of no service;that I was much pressed to arrive below, as my general expected me, my duty called me, and the state of my provision demanded the utmost expedition; that I would be happy to oblige him, but my men must eat. He replied that, Lake Pepin being yet shut with ice, if I went on and encamped on the ice it would not get me provision; that he would send out all his young men the next day; and that if the other bands did not arrive he would depart the day after with me. In short, after much talk, I agreed to remain one day, knowing that the lake was closed and that we could proceed only nine miles if we went.

This appeared to give general satisfaction. I was invited to different feasts, and entertained at one by a person whose father had been enacted a chief by the Spaniards.At this feast I saw a man called by the French RomanNose [Nez de Corbeau[III-31]], and by the Indians Wind thatWalks, who was formerly the second chief of the Sioux;but being the cause of the death of one of the traders, seven years since, he voluntarily relinquished that dignity, and has frequently requested to be given up to the whites. But he was now determined to go to St. Louis and deliver himself up, where he said they might put him to death. His long repentance and the great confidence of the nation in him would perhaps protect him from a punishment which the crime merited. But as the crime was committed long before the United States assumed its authority, and as no law of theirs could affect it, unless it were ex post facto and had a retrospective effect, I conceived it would certainly be dis punishable[III-32] now. I did not think proper, however, to so inform him. I here received a letter from Mr. Rollett,[III-33]partner of Mr. Cameron, with a present of some brandy,coffee, and sugar. I hesitated about receiving those articles from the partner of the man I intended to prosecute: their amount being trifling, however, I accepted of them, offering him pay. I assured him that the prosecution arose from a sense of duty, and not from any personal prejudice. Mycanoe did not come up, in consequence of the head wind.Sent out two men in a canoe to set fishing-lines; the canoe overset, and had it not been for the timely assistance of the savages, who carried them into their lodges, undressed them, and treated them with the greatest humanity and kindness, they must inevitably have perished. At this place I was informed that the rascal spoken of as having threatened my life had actually cocked his gun to shoot me from behind the hills, but was prevented by the others.

Apr. 14th. Was invited to a feast by Roman Nose. His conversation was interesting, and shall be detailed hereafter.The other Indians had not yet arrived. Messrs. Wood,Frazer, and myself ascended a high hill called the Barn [orLa Grange; see note68, p. 70], from which we had a view ofLake Pepin, of the valley through which the Mississippi by numerous channels wound itself to the St. Croix, the Cannon river, and the lofty hills on each side.

Apr. 15th. Arose very early and embarked about sunrise,much to the astonishment of the Indians, who were entirely prepared for the council when they heard I had put off.However, after some conversation with Mr. Frazer, they acknowledged that it was agreeably to what I had said, thatI would sail early, and that they could not blame me. I was very positive in my word, for I found it by far the best way to treat the Indians. Aile Rouge had a beaver robe and pipe prepared to present, but was obliged for the present to retain it. Passed through Lake Pepin with my barges; the canoe being obliged to lie by, did not come on.Stopped at a prairie on the right bank, descending about nine miles below Lake Pepin. Went out to view some hills which had the appearance of the old fortifications spoken of [by Carver: see note of the Grand Encampment, p.59]; but I will speak more fully of them hereafter. In these hollows I discovered a flock of elk; took out 15 men,but we were not able to kill any. Mr. Frazer came up and passed on about two miles. We encamped together.Neither Mr. Wood’s nor my canoe arrived. Snowed considerably.

Apr. 16th. Mr. Frazer’s canoes and my boats sailed about one hour by the sun. We waited some time, expecting Mr.Wood’s barges and my canoe; but hearing a gun fired just above our encampment, we were induced to make sail.Passed Aile Prairie [Winona: note57, p. 54], also La Montagnequi Trompe a [Trempe à] L’eau, the prairie De Cross [LaCrosse], and encamped on the W. shore [at Brownsville], a few hundred yards below where I had encamped on the[11th] day of September, in ascending. Killed a goose flying.Shot at some pigeons at our camp, and was answered from behind an island with two guns; we returned them,and were replied to by two more. This day the trees appeared in bloom. Snow might still be seen on the sides of the hills. Distance 75 miles.

Apr. 17th. Put off pretty early and arrived at Wabasha’sband at eleven o’clock, where I [was] detained all day for him [at Upper Iowa river]; but he alone of all the hunters remained out all night. Left some powder and tobacco for him. The Sioux presented me with a kettle of boiled meat and a deer. I here received information that thePuants had killed some white men below. Mr. Wood’sand my canoe arrived.

Apr. 18th. Departed from our encampment very early.Stopped to breakfast at the Painted Rock. Arrived atPrairie Des Cheins at two o’clock, and were received by crowds on the bank. Took up my quarters at Mr. Fisher’s.My men received a present of one barrel of pork fromMr. Campbell, a bag of biscuit, 20 loaves of bread, and some meat from Mr. Fisher. A Mr. Jearreau, from Cahokia,is here, who embarks to-morrow for St. Louis. I wrote toGeneral Wilkinson by him.[III-34] I was called on by a number of chiefs, Reynards, Sioux of the Des Moyan [Des Moinesriver], etc. The Winebagos were here intending, as I wasinformed, to deliver some of the murderers to me. Received a great deal of news from the States and Europe, both civil and military.

Apr. 19th. Dined at Mr. Campbell’s in company withMessrs. Wilmot, Blakely, Wood, Rollet, Fisher, Frazer, andJearreau. Six canoes arrived from the upper part of St.Peters, with the Yanctong chiefs from the head of that river.Their appearance was indeed savage, much more so than any nation I have yet seen. Prepared my boat for sail.Gave notice to the Puants that I had business to do with them the next day. A band of the Gens Du Lac arrived.Took into my pay as interpreter Mr. Y. [read J.] Reinville.

Sunday, Apr. 20th. Held a council with the Puant chiefs,and demanded of them the murderers of their nation;[III-35]they required till to-morrow to consider it. I made a written demand of the magistrates to take depositions concerning the late murders.[III-36] Had a private conversation withWabasha.

This afternoon they had a great game of the cross on the prairie, between the Sioux on the one side, and the Puants and Reynards on the other. The ball is made of some hard substance and covered with leather; the cross-sticks are round and net-work, with handles of three feet long. The parties being ready, and bets agreed upon, sometimes to the amount of some thousand dollars, the goals are set upon the prairie at the distance of half a mile. The ball is thrown up in the middle, and each party strives to drive it to the opposite goal; when either party gains the first rubber,which is driving it quick round the post, the ball is again taken to the center, the ground changed, and the contest renewed; and this is continued until one side gains four times, which decides the bet. It is an interesting sight tosee two or three hundred naked savages contending on theplain who shall bear off the palm of victory; as he who drives the ball round the goal is much shouted at by his companions. It sometimes happens that one catches the ball in his racket, and depending on his speed endeavors to carry it to the goal; when he finds himself too closely pursued he hurls it with great force and dexterity to an amazing distance, where there are always flankers of both parties ready to receive it; it seldom touches the ground, but is sometimes kept in the air for hours before either party can gain the victory. In the game which I witnessed the Sioux were victorious — more, I believe, from the superiority of their skill in throwing the ball than by their swiftness,for I thought the Puants and Reynards the swiftest runners.

Apr. 21st. Was sent for by La Feuille, and had a long and interesting conversation with him, in which he spoke of the general jealousy of his nation toward their chiefs;and said that although he knew it might occasion some of the Sioux displeasure, he did not hesitate to declare that he looked on Nez Corbeau [otherwise Raven Nose andRoman Nose] as the man of most sense in their nation, and he believed it would be generally acceptable if he was reinstated in his rank. Upon my return I was sent for byRed Thunder,[III-37] chief of the Yanctongs, the most savage band of the Sioux. He was prepared with the most elegant pipes and robes I ever saw, and shortly declared, "That white blood had never been shed in the village of theYanctongs, even when rum was permitted; that Mr. MurdochCameron arrived at his village last autumn; that he invited him to eat, gave him corn as a bird; that Cameron informed him of the prohibition of rum, and was the only person who afterward sold it in the village." After this I had a council with the Puants. Spent the evening with Mr.Wilmot, one of the best informed and most gentlemanly men in the place.

Apr. 22d. Held a council with the Sioux and Puants,the latter of whom delivered up their [British] medals and flags. Prepared to depart to-morrow.

Apr. 23d. After closing my accounts, etc., at half past twelve o’clock we left the Prairie; at the lower end of it were saluted by 17 lodges of the Puants. Met a barge, by which I received a letter from my lady. Further on met one batteau and one canoe of traders. Passed one trader’scamp. Arrived at Mr. Dubuque’s at [mouth of CatfishCreek, at] ten o’clock at night; found some traders encamped at the entrance with 40 or 50 Indians; obtained some information from Mr. D., and requested him to write me on certain points. After we had boiled our victuals, I divided my men into four watches and put off, wind ahead. Observed for the first time the half-formed leaves on the trees.

Apr. 24th. In the morning we used our oars until ten o’clock, and then floated while breakfasting. At this time two barges, one bark, and two wooden canoes passed us under full sail; by one of which I sent back a letter to Mr.Dubuque that I had forgotten to deliver. Stopped at dark to cook supper; after which, rowed under the windward shore, expecting we could make headway with four oars;but were blown on the lee shore in a few moments, when all hands were summoned, and we again with difficulty made to windward, came-to, placed one sentry on my bow,and all hands beside went to sleep. It rained, and before morning the water overflowed my bed in the bottom of the boat, having no cover or any extra accommodations, as it might have retarded my voyage. The wind very hard ahead.

Apr. 25th. Obliged to unship our mast to prevent its rolling overboard with the swell. Passed the first Reynardvillage [near head of Rock River rapids on the Iowan side]at twelve o’clock; counted 18 lodges. Stopped at the prairie in descending on the left, about the middle of therapids, where there is a beautiful cove or harbor [Watertown,Rock Island Co., Ill.]. There were three lodges ofIndians here, but none of them came near us. Shortly after we had left this, observed a barge under sail, with theUnited States flag, which upon our being seen put to shore on the Big [now Rock] Island, about three miles aboveStony [Rock] river, where I also landed. It proved to beCapt. Many[III-38] of the Artillerists, who was in search of someOsage prisoners among the Sacs and Reynards. He informed me that at the [large Sac] village of Stony Point[near the mouth of Rock river] the Indians evinced a strong disposition to commit hostilities; that he was met at the mouth of the river by an old Indian, who said that all the inhabitants of the village were in a state of intoxication,and advised him to go up alone. This advice, however,he had rejected. That when they arrived there they were saluted by the appellation of the bloody Americans who had killed such a person’s father, such a person’smother, brother, etc. The women carried off the guns and other arms, and concealed them. That he then crossed the river opposite the village, and was followed by a number of Indians with pistols under their blankets. That they would listen to no conference whatever relating to the delivery of the prisoners, but demanded insolently why he wore a plume in his hat, declared that they looked on it asa mark of war, and immediately decorated themselves with their raven’s feathers, worn only in cases of hostility. We regretted that our orders would not permit of our punishingthe scoundrels, as by a coup de main we might easily havecarried the village. Gave Capt. Many a note of introduction to Messrs. Campbell, Fisher, Wilmot, and Dubuque,and every information in my power. We sat up late conversing.

Apr. 26th. Capt. Many and myself took breakfast and embarked; wind directly ahead, and a most tremendous swell to combat, which has existed ever since we left the prairie. Capt. Many under full sail. Descended by all the sinuosity of the shore, to avoid the strength of the wind and force of the waves. Indeed I was confident I could sail much faster up than we could possibly make down.Encamped on Grant’s prairie, where we had encamped Aug.25th when ascending. There was one Indian and family present, to whom I gave some corn.

Sunday, Apr. 27th. It cleared off during the night. We embarked early and came from eight or ten leagues above the river Iowa to the [U. S. agricultural] establishment at the lower Sac village [at Nauvoo, Ill., see Aug. 20th,1805] by sundown, a distance of nearly 48 leagues. HereI met with Messrs. Maxwell and Blondeau; took the deposition of the former on the subject of the Indians’intoxication at this place, for they were all drunk. They had stolen a horse from the establishment, and offered to bring him back for liquor, but laughed at them when offered a blanket and powder. Passed two canoes and two barges. At the establishment received two letters fromMrs. Pike. Took with us Corporal Eddy and the other soldier whom Capt. Many had left. Rowed with four oars all night. A citizen took passage with me.

Apr. 28th. In the morning passed a wintering-ground where, from appearance, there must have been at least seven or eight different establishments. At twelve o’clock arrived at the French house [Hurricane Settlement] mentioned in our voyage up, Aug. 16th [see note13, that date].Here we landed our citizen; his name was [Blank], and he belonged to the settlement on Copper river. He informed me there were about 25 families in the settlement.

Stopped at some islands [note12, Aug. 15th] about ten miles above Salt river, where there were pigeon-roosts, and in about 15 minutes my men had knocked on the head and brought on board 298. I had frequently heard of the fecundity of this bird [Ectopistes migratorius[III-39]], and never gave credit to what I then thought inclined to the marvelous;but really the most fervid imagination cannot conceive their numbers. Their noise in the woods was like the continued roaring of the wind, and the ground may be said to have been absolutely covered with their excrement. The young ones which we killed were nearly as large as the old;they could fly about ten steps, and were one mass of fat; their craws were filled with acorns and the wild pea. They were still reposing on their nests, which were merely small bunches of sticks joined, with which all the small trees were covered.

Met four canoes of the Sacs, with wicker baskets filled with young pigeons. They made motions to exchange them for liquor, to which I returned the back of my hand.Indeed those scoundrels had become so insolent, through the instigation of the traders, that nothing but the lenity of our government and humanity for the poor devils could have restrained me on my descent from carrying some of their towns by surprise, which I was determined to have done had the information of their firing on Capt. Many proved to have been correct.

Put into the mouth of Salt river to cook supper, after which, although raining, we put off and set our watches;but so violent a gale and thunderstorm came on about twelve o’clock that we put ashore. Discovered that one of my sleigh-dogs was missing.

Apr. 29th. In the morning still raining, and wind up the river; hoisted sail and returned to the mouth of the river,but neither here nor on the shore could we find my dog.This was no little mortification, as it broke the match,whose important services I had already experienced, after having brought them so near home. We continued on until twelve o’clock, when it ceased raining for a little time, and we put ashore for breakfast. Rowed till sundown, when I set the watch. Night fine and mild.

Apr. 30th. By daylight found ourselves at the Portagede Sioux. I here landed Captain Many’s two men, and ordered them across by land to the cantonment [Belle Fontaine,on the Missouri]. As I had never seen the village, I walked up and through it; there are not more than 21 houses at furthest, which are built of square logs. Met Lieut.Hughes[III-40] about four miles above St. Louis,[III-41] with morethan 20 Osage prisoners, conveying them to the cantonmenton the Missouri; he informed me my friends were all well.Arrived about twelve o’clock at the town, after an absence of eight months and 22 days.

CHAPTER IV.

WEATHER DIARY OF THE MISSISSIPPI.[IV-1]

Meteorological Observations made by Lieutenant Pike, on theMississippi, in 1805 and 1806.

Note. — These observations are very imperfect, my mode of traveling being such as to prevent my making regular references to the thermometer; and during the intense cold which prevailed some part of the winter, the mercury of the barometer sank into the bulb. I was also frequently obliged to be absent from my party, when it was impossible for me to carry instruments. Those different circumstances occasioned the omissions which appear in the table. The instrument employed was Reaumer’s, but the observations made have been adapted to the scale of Fahrenheit. — Z. M. Pike, 1st lieutenant.

Date. Thermometer
(degrees).
Sky. Wind. N. Lat. W. Long. Var. Barometer
(inches).
sunrise. 3 p.m. sunset. Course. Force.
Aug.
6 .... .... .... clear S S E fresh 39° 1´ 15° 20´ Ph. 7° 54´ 28.5
7 .... 90 .... thunderstorm N W very hard .... .... .... 28
8 .... 75 .... rain N W do. .... .... .... 28.5
9 .... 83 .... cloudy S by E light .... .... .... 28.8
10 .... 97 .... flying clouds W squally .... .... .... 28
11 .... 108½ .... do. W by S .... .... .... .... 20
12 .... 101¾ .... rain S by W fresh .... .... .... 29.2
13 .... 83¾ .... hard rain N W do. .... .... .... ....
14 .... 81½ .... do. S by E do. .... .... .... 28.5
15 .... 88¼ .... rainy N W do. 40° 31´ 16° 41´ .... 29
16 .... 90½ .... clear N W gentle .... .... .... 30
17 .... 88¼ .... do. S E do. .... .... .... 30.2
18 .... 81½ .... cloudy N W strong .... .... .... 28.5
19 .... 99½ .... clear N W gentle .... .... .... 30
20 .... 90½ .... do. E do. .... .... .... 30
21 .... 88¼ .... cloudy S E fresh 40° 32´ 12´´ .... .... 29
22 .... 90½ .... clear N by W strong .... .... .... 29.5
23 .... 106¼ .... do. .... .... .... .... .... 30
24 .... 82¾ .... clear .... .... .... .... .... 30
25 .... 81¼ .... cloudy N by W strong .... .... .... 2
26 61¼ 72½ .... rain N by W gale .... .... .... ....
27 54½ 63½ .... do. N by W do. .... .... .... ....
28 52¼ 61¼ .... do. S by E hard .... .... .... ....
29 52¼ 72½ .... cloudy S by E fresh .... .... .... 28.5
30 61¼ 88¼ .... clear S by W do. .... .... .... 28
31 .... 92¾ .... do. S by W gentle .... .... .... 28.5
Sept.
1 .... 88¼ .... clear S E fresh .... .... .... 30
2 .... 95 .... do. S gentle .... .... .... 29.3
3 .... 79¼ .... cloudy N W do. .... .... .... 28.8
4 .... 77 .... do. S W do. 43° 44´ 8´´ .... .... 29
5 .... 88¼ .... rain S W fresh .... .... .... 27
6 .... 95 .... clear S by E do. .... .... .... 27
7 .... 86 .... cloudy S by E do. .... .... .... 28
8 .... 99½ .... do. S by E do. .... .... .... 29.5
9 .... 92¾ .... do. S gentle .... .... .... 28.8
10 .... 72½ .... rain N by W fresh .... .... .... ....
11 .... 59 .... do. N by E hard .... .... .... ....
12 .... 52¼ .... do. N by E do. .... .... .... ....
13 .... 50 .... do. N gentle .... .... .... ....
14 .... 43¼ .... clear S E do. .... .... .... ....
15 .... 65¾ .... rain S E do. .... .... .... 28
16 .... 77 .... rising clouds S E fresh .... .... .... 28.5
17 .... 65¾ .... rain N W hard .... .... .... ....
18 .... 77 .... cloudy N W gentle 45° 44´ 8´´ .... .... ....
19 .... 65¾ .... do. S E fresh .... .... .... ....
20 .... 72½ .... clear N W do. .... .... .... 28.5
21 41 77 .... do. S E gentle .... .... .... 29
22 .... 77 .... do. N W fresh .... .... .... ....
23 .... 81½ .... cloudy N W do. .... .... .... 28.5
24 .... 86 .... do. N W do. .... .... .... ....
25 .... 77 .... flying clouds N W do. .... .... .... ....
26 .... 65¾ .... cloudy S E do. .... .... .... ....
27 .... 65¾ .... do. S E .... .... .... .... ....
28 .... 65¾ .... rain S by E hard .... .... .... 28
29 .... 72½ .... cloudy S by E fresh, hard .... .... .... ....
30 .... 65¾ .... do. N E .... .... .... .... ....
Oct.
1 50 65¾ .... cloudy N W fresh 45° .... .... 28.5
2 50 72½ .... rain N W ... .... .... .... 28
3 32 50 .... clear N W   .... .... .... 28.4
4 32 50 .... cloudy, hail N W   .... .... .... 29
5 32 23 .... clear N W hard .... .... .... 29.5
6 32 23 .... do. N W do. .... .... .... 29.5
7 36½ 50 .... do. N W do. .... .... .... 29
8 26 50 .... do. S E fresh .... .... .... 29.5
9 41 54½ .... do. W by N .... .... .... .... 29.5
10 50 88¼ 65¾ do. S by W do. .... .... .... 29.5
11 36½ 65¾ 54½ do. N by W do. .... .... .... 29
12 36½ 59 36½ do. N by W hard .... .... .... 29.5
13 36 72½ 59 do. S by W fresh .... .... .... 36.2
14 36 65¾ 50 do. N W gentle .... .... .... 29
15 43¼ 54½ 41 cloudy, rain N by W fresh .... .... .... 28.5
16 50 65¾ 54½ snow do. do. 45° 33´ 3´´ .... .... 28.5
17 41 50 52 do. do. do. .... .... .... 28
18 43¼ 54½ 50 cloudy S by W do. .... .... .... 29.5
19 45½ 59 54½ clear, cloudy do. gentle .... .... .... 29.8
20 43¼ 54 43¼ do. do. do. .... .... .... 29.5
21 23 14 20 clear do. do. .... .... .... 29
22 29 45 32 cloudy, snow N by W do. .... .... .... 28.5
23 20 27 23 do. N W do. .... .... .... 29.3
24 20 27 23 do. N W do. .... .... .... 29
25 16 23 43 cloudy .... do. .... .... 9° 10´ 29
26 11 20 32 clear W do. .... .... .... 29.5
27 20 32 43¼ do. W do. .... .... .... 30
28 20 43 47 do. N E do. 45° 33´ 3´´ .... 9° 10´ S 29.5
29 27 50 43 cloudy, rain N E do. .... .... .... 29
30 50 52 50 do. N E do. .... .... .... 28.5
31 32 43 47 cloudy N do. .... .... 9° 10´ S 28
Nov.
1 36 .... .... rain .... .... 45° 33´ 3´´ .... .... 28
2 .... .... .... snow .... .... .... .... .... ....
3 .... warm .... fair .... .... .... .... .... ....
4 .... fresh .... do. N E gentle .... .... .... ....
5 .... warm .... do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
6 .... cool .... snow N W .... .... .... .... ....
7 .... warm .... hail, rain do. .... .... .... .... ....
8 .... do. .... light snow do. .... .... .... .... ....
9 .... cold 27 do. do. .... .... .... .... ....
10 14 20 20 clear N W gentle .... .... .... 28
11 20 25 25 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
12 27 25 27 cloudy S W do. .... .... .... 28.5
13 38 36 38 do. .... do. .... .... .... 28.5
14 41 .... .... rain .... .... .... .... .... ....
15 47 38 41 cloudy .... .... .... .... .... ....
16 54 36 47 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
17 47 36 32 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
18 36 34 32 clear .... .... .... .... .... ....
19 38 36 23 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
20 38 36 41 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
21 41 36 45 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
22 41 36 38 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
23 41 32 27 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
24 38 34 32 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
25 41 38 38 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
26 38 32 34 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
27 38 38 34 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
28 29 43 41 clear N W fresh .... .... .... ....
29 23 32 36 do. N gentle .... .... .... ....
30 16 27 25 do. N by W do. .... .... .... ....
Dec.
1 25 32 32 snow S W gentle 45° 33´ 9´´ .... .... ....
2 7 27 16 clear S E do. .... .... .... ....
3 16 32 20 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
4 20 32 27 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
5 23 32 32 cloudy S E do. .... .... .... ....
6 25 32 32 clear S E do. .... .... .... ....
7 20 27 25 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
8 16 25 27 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
9 20 25 23 do. N E fresh .... .... .... ....
10 23 27 29 cloudy N W do. .... .... .... ....
11 27 .... 43 do. S E gentle .... .... .... ....
12 29 .... 32 do. N W fresh .... .... .... ....
13 38 .... 32 snow N W hard .... .... .... ....
14 29 .... 7 .... N W do. .... .... .... ....
15 7 .... 11 cloudy N W do. .... .... .... ....
16 9 .... 43 clear S gentle .... .... .... ....
17 20 .... 32 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
18 36 .... 36 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
19 36 .... 25 cloudy SE, NW fresh .... .... .... ....
20 25 .... 32 do. N E gentle .... .... .... ....
21 18 .... 27 do. N E do. .... .... .... ....
22 2 .... 5 clear N E do. .... .... .... ....
23 2 .... 32 do. N E do. .... .... .... ....
24 5 .... 27 do. N E do. 45° 49´ 50´´ .... .... ....
25 27 .... 27 cloudy N W do. .... .... .... ....
26 23 .... 29 do. N E do. .... .... .... ....
27 23 .... 29 snow E do. .... .... .... ....
28 23 .... 32 cloudy S W do. .... .... .... ....
29 20 .... 11 clear N W hard .... .... .... ....
30 9 .... 11 do. W do. .... .... .... ....
31 9 .... 20 do. W do. .... .... .... ....
Jan.
1 17-4/10 .... 11 cloudy, snow N E fresh .... .... .... ....
2 2 .... 20 clear E do. .... .... .... ....
3 20 .... 25 do. W .... .... .... .... ....
4 23 .... 25 do. W .... .... .... .... ....
5 33-5/10 .... 20 do. E .... .... .... .... ....
6 20 .... 9 snow W hard 46° 9´ 20´´ .... .... ....
7 15-2/10 .... 1 clear .... .... .... .... .... ....
8 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
9 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
10 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
11 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
12 .... .... 2 clear S E .... .... .... .... ....
13 28-5/10 .... 6 do. .... .... 46° 9´ 20´´ 22° 13´ .... ....
14 24 | .... 1 do. N .... 46° 9´ 20´´ .... 3° 41´ W ....
15 33-5/10 .... 6 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
16 19-8/10 .... 5 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
17 6 23 20 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
18 9 25 20 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
19 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
20 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
21 .... .... 23 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
22 14 .... 27 clear N W .... .... .... .... ....
23 27 | .... 27 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
24 27 29 32 cloudy S by E .... .... .... .... ....
25 .... 27 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
26 .... 5 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
27 .... 5 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
28 4 2 5 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
29 5 14 11 .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
30 1 14 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
31 8 14 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
Feb.
1 10 7 5 clear .... .... 47° 16´ 13´´ .... .... ....
2 5 9 14 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
3 7 27 23 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
4 1 9 1 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
5 10 14 7 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
6 5 27 11 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
7 2 23 20 do. W fresh .... .... .... ....
8 8 1 9 do. W hard .... .... .... ....
9 17-5/10 1 8 snow .... .... .... .... .... ....
10 17-5/10 1 5 do. N E gentle .... .... .... ....
11 1 7 1 clear S E .... .... .... .... ....
12 5 16 1 do. N E .... .... .... .... ....
13 23 36 32 hail, clouds S by E fresh .... .... .... ....
14 11 36 32 clear N W .... .... .... .... ....
15 5 20 16 do. N W .... .... .... .... ....
16 2 23 16 do. S W .... .... .... .... ....
17 5 32 32 sleet, snow .... .... .... .... .... ....
18 14 32 .... clear .... .... .... .... .... ....
19 .... .... 20 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
20 1 .... 27 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
21 14 .... 27 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
22 16 .... 27 do. .... .... 46° 32´ 32´´ .... .... ....
23 14 .... 23 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
24 16 .... 20 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
25 11 .... 25 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
26 23 .... 36 do. S W .... .... .... .... ....
27 16 .... 11 .... N W .... .... .... .... ....
28 16 .... .... .... N W .... .... .... .... ....
Mar.
1 16 .... 16 clear S E .... .... .... .... ....
2 16 .... 20 cloudy S E .... .... .... .... ....
3 20 .... 43 clear E .... .... .... .... ....
4 20 .... 27 do. E .... .... .... .... ....
5 25 .... 29 do. .... .... 45° 33´ 3´´ .... .... ....
6 36 .... 27 do. .... .... .... .... .... ....
7 29 41 27 clear, warm .... .... .... .... .... ....
8 29 25 23 cloudy S E hard .... .... .... ....
9 36 43 41 clear S E .... .... .... .... ....
10 25 25 27 do. N E .... .... .... .... ....
11 32 36 38 cloudy S E fresh .... .... .... ....
12 34 47 38 clear N W do. .... .... .... ....
13 33 43 27 do. N W .... 45° 14´ 8´´ .... .... ....
14 38 43 34 do. N W fresh .... .... .... ....
15 50 41 36 do. N do. .... .... .... ....
16 38 43 36 do. E do. .... .... .... ....
17 32 32 32 snow N W do. .... .... .... ....
18 32 32 32 do. N do. 43° 44´ 8´´ .... .... ....
19 32 32 29 do. N E do. .... .... .... ....
20 29 38 29 cloudy N by E do. .... .... .... ....
21 9 32 20 clear N W do. .... .... .... ....
22 1 9 14 do. N E do. .... .... .... ....
23 7 32 32 do. E do. .... .... .... ....
24 5 25 32 cloudy N E .... .... .... .... ....
25 25 32 32 snow S E .... .... .... .... ....
26 11 25 27 clear E fresh .... .... .... ....
27 38 54 43 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
28 36 41 43 do. S W do. .... .... .... ....
29 29 70 54 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
30 52 56 43 cloudy N E do. .... .... .... ....
31 32 61 43 clear N E .... .... .... .... ....
Apr.
1 29 61 43 clear N E fresh .... .... .... ....
2 34 74 63 do. S hard .... .... .... ....
3 45 70 43 do. N E do. .... .... .... ....
4 20 45 41 do. N E do. .... .... .... ....
5 29 45 38 cloudy N E do. .... .... .... ....
6 27 43 36 do. N E do. .... .... .... ....
7 23 .... 32 snow N E .... .... .... .... ....
8 41 .... 34 cloudy N .... .... .... .... ....
9 5 18 32 clear N E .... .... .... .... ....
10 5 54 25 do. N E .... .... .... .... ....
11 18 32 32 snow S E .... .... .... .... ....
12 10 54 43 clear S E .... .... .... .... ....
13 32 50 45 do. S E hard .... .... .... ....
14 38 50 45 cloudy, rain S E .... .... .... .... ....
15 34 52 32 snow S E .... .... .... .... ....
16 34 50 41 do. N W fresh .... .... .... ....
17 34 70 43 clear N W do. .... .... .... ....
18 45 92 63 do. N W do. .... .... .... ....
19 50 99 81 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
20 59 95 79 do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
21 54 92 63 cloudy N W .... .... .... .... ....
22 43 63 52 clear N W fresh .... .... .... ....
23 36 72 63 do. S E .... .... .... .... ....
24 43 70 61 cloudy S E hard .... .... .... ....
25 43 54 47 cloudy, rain S E do. .... .... .... ....
26 43 50 .... do. S E do. .... .... .... ....
27 43 95 77 clear N E gentle .... .... .... ....
28 43 81 72 cloudy S E do. .... .... .... ....
29 38 59 .... rain N W .... .... .... .... ....

Remarks.

CHAPTER V.

CORRESPONDENCE AND CONFERENCES.[V-1]

Art. 1. Letter, Pike to Wilkinson. (Orig. No. 1, pp. 1, 2.)

Head of the Rapids de Moyen, Aug. 20th, 1805.

Dear General:

I arrived here this day, after what I have considered as rather an unfortunate voyage, having had a series of rainy weather for the first six days, by which means all our biscuit was more or less damaged, they being in very bad and open barrels; and our having got twice so fast on forked sawyers or old trees as to oblige me partly to unload, and staving in a plank on another [sawyer], which nearly sunk our boat before we got on shore and detained us one whole day. These all occasioned unavoidable detentions of two days, and the innumerable islands and sand-bars which,without exaggeration, exceed those of the river below theOhio, have been the cause of much unexpected delay. ButI calculate on getting to Prairie de Chien in at least the same time I was in coming [from St. Louis] here.

We were met yesterday on the Rapids by Mr. William Ewing, who is sent here by the government of the UnitedStates to teach the savages agriculture; and who, I perceive in Governor Harrison’s instructions, is termed an agent of the United States, under the instructions of P. Choteau,with, he says, a salary of $500 per annum. I conceived you did not know of this functionary, else you would have mentioned him to me. He was accompanied by Monsieur LouisTisson Houire [Tesson Honoré[V-2]], who informed me he had calculated on going with me as my interpreter; he said that you had spoken to him on the occasion, and appeared much disappointed when I told him I had no instructions to that effect. He also said he had promised to discover mines,etc., which no person knew but himself; but, as I conceive him much of a hypocrite, and possessing great gasconism, I am happy he was not chosen for my voyage. They brought with them three peroques of Indians, who lightened my barge and assisted me up the Rapids. They expressed great regret at the news of two men having been killed on the river below, which I believe to be a fact, as I have it from various channels, and were very apprehensive they would be censured by our government as the authors [of these murders], though from every inquiry they conceive it not to be the case, and seem to ascribe the murders to the Kickapoos. They strongly requested I would hear what they had to say on the subject; this, with an idea that this place would be a central position for a trading establishment for the Sacs, Reynards, Iowas of the de Moyen, Sioux from the head of said [Des Moines] river, and Paunte [Puants]of the de Roche [Rock river], has induced me to halt part of the day to-morrow. I should say more relative to Messrs.Ewing and Houire, only that they propose visiting you with the Indians who descend, as I understand by your request, in about 30 days, when your penetration will give you le tout ensemble of their characters [note18, p. 15].

I have taken the liberty of inclosing a letter to Mrs. Piketo your care. My compliments to Lieutenant Wilkinson,and the tender of my highest respects for your lady, with the best wishes for your health and prosperity.

I am, General,
Your obedient servant,
[Signed] Z. M. Pike.

General Wilkinson.


Art. 2. Letter, Pike to Wilkinson. (Orig. No. 2, pp. 2-4.)

Prairie du Chien, Sept. 5th, 1805.

Dear General:

I arrived here day before yesterday, and found my interpret ergone in the employ of Mr. Dickson. I then endeavored to gain information relative to crossing the falls; and amidst the ignorance of the Canadians, and all the contradiction in the world, I have learned it is impossible to carry my large barge round the shoot [chute]. I have therefore hired two Schenectady barges, in which I shall embark day after to-morrow, with some expectation and hope of seeing the head of the Mississippi and the town of St. Louis yet this winter.

I have chosen three places for military establishments.The first is on a hill about 40 miles above the river deMoyen rapids, on the W. side of the river, in about 41° 2´N. latitude. The channel of the river runs on that shore;the hill in front is about 60 feet perpendicular, nearly level on the top; 400 yards in the rear is a small prairie fit for gardening; over on the E. side of the river you have an elegant view on an immense prairie, as far as the eye can extend, now and then interrupted by clumps of trees; and,to crown all, immediately under the hill is a limestonespring, sufficient for the consumption of a regiment. The landing is good and bold, and at the point of the hill a road could be made for a wagon in half a day. This place I conceive to be the best to answer the general’s instructions relative to an intermediate post between Prairie de Chien and St. Louis; but if its being on the W. bank is a material objection, about 30 miles above the second Sac village at the third yellow bank on the E. side is a commanding place,on a prairie and most elegantly situated; but it is scarce of timber, and no water but that of the Mississippi. When then thinking of the post to be established at the Ouiscousing[mouth of Wisconsin river], I did not look at the general’s instructions. I therefore pitched on a spot on the top of the hill on the W. side of the Mississippi [at or near McGregor, Clayton Co., Ia.], which is — — feet high, level on the top, and completely commands both rivers, the Mississippi being only one-half mile wide and the Ouiscousing about 900 yards when full. There is plenty of timber in the rear, and a spring at no great distance on the hill. If this position is to have in view the annoyance of any European power who might be induced to attack it with cannon, it has infinitely the preference to a position called the PetitGris on the Ouiscousing, which I visited and marked the next day. This latter position is three miles up the Ouiscousing, on a prairie hill on the W. side, where we should be obliged to get our timber from the other side of the river, and our water out of it; there is likewise a small channel which runs on the opposite side, navigable in high water, which could not be commanded by the guns of the fort, and a hill about three-quarters of a mile in the rear, from which it could be cannonaded.These two positions I have marked by blazing trees, etc. Mr. Fisher of this place will direct any officer who may be sent to occupy them. I found the confluence of the Ouiscousing and Mississippi to be in lat. 43° 28´ 8´´ N.

The day of my arrival at the lead mines, I was taken with a fever which, with Monsieur Dubuque’s having no horses about his house, obliged me to content myself with proposing to him the inclosed queries [Art. 3]; the answers seem to carry with them the semblance of equivocation.

Messrs. Dubuque and Dickson were about sending a number of chiefs to St. Louis, but the former confessing he was not authorized, I have stopped them without in the least dissatisfying the Indians.

Dickson is at Michilimackinac. I cannot say I have experienced much spirit of accommodation from his clerks,when in their power to oblige me; but I beg leave tore commend to your attention Mr. James Aird, who is now in your country, as a gentleman to whose humanity and politeness I am much indebted; also Mr. Fisher of this place, the captain of militia and justice of the peace.

A band of Sioux between here and the Mississippi have applied for two medals, in order that they may have their chiefs distinguished as friends of the Americans: if the general thinks proper to send them here to the care of Mr.Fisher, with any other commands, they may possibly meet me here, or at the falls of St. Anthony, on my return.

[Lacuna here, indicating suppression of certain Spanish privacies.]

The above suggestion would only be acceptable under the idea of our differences with Spain being compromised;as should there be war, the field of action is the sphere foryoung men, where they hope, or at least aspire, to gather laurels or renown to smooth the decline of age, or a glorious death. You see, my dear general, I write to you like a person addressing a father; at the same time I hope you will consider me, not only in a professional but a personal view, one who holds you in the highest respect and esteem.My compliments to Lieutenant Wilkinson, and my highest respects to your lady.

I am, General,
Your obedient servant,
[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Lt.

General Wilkinson.


Art. 3. The Dubuque Interrogation.[V-3] Queries proposed toMr. Dubuque, with his answers.

1. What is the date of your grant of the mines from the savages —

Ans. The copy of the grant is in Mr. [Antoine Pierre]Soulard’s [Surveyor-general’s] office at St. Louis.

2. What is the date of the confirmation by the Spaniards —

Ans. The same as to query first.

3. What is the extent of your grant —

Ans. The same as above.

4. What is the extent of the mines —

Ans. Twenty-eight or twenty-seven leagues long, and from one to three broad.

5. Lead made per annum —

Ans. From 20,000 to 40,000 pounds.

6. Quantity of lead per cwt. of mineral —

Ans. Seventy-five per cent.

7. Quantity of lead in pigs —

Ans. All we make, as we neither manufacture bar, sheet-lead,nor shot.

8. If mixed with any other mineral —

Ans. We have seen some copper, but having no person sufficiently acquainted with chemistry to make the experiment properly, cannot say as to the proportion it bears to the lead.

[Signed] Z. M. Pike.

Dubuque Lead Mines, Sept. 1st, 1805.


Art. 4. Speech, Pike to the Sioux[V-4] (Part of Orig. No. 3, pp.6-8), delivered at the entrance of the river St. Peter’s,Sept. 23d, 1803.

Brothers: I am happy to meet you here at this council fire, which your father has sent me to kindle, and to takeyou by the hands as our children, we having lately acquired from the Spanish [read French] the extensive territory ofLouisiana. Our general has thought proper to send out a number of his young warriors to visit all his red children, to tell them his will, and to hear what request they may have to make of their father. I am happy the choice has fallen on me to come this road; as I find my brothers, the Sioux,ready to listen to my words.

Brothers: It is the wish of our government to establish military posts on the Upper Mississippi, at such places as may be thought expedient. I have therefore examined the country, and have pitched on the mouth of the St. Croix, this place [mouth of the Minnesota river], and the Falls of St. Anthony. I therefore wish you to grant to the United States nine miles square at St. Croix; and at this place,from a league below the confluence of St. Peter’s and the Mississippi to a league above St. Anthony, extending three leagues on each side of the river. As we are a people who are accustomed to have all our acts written down, in order to have them handed down to our children, I have drawn up a form of an agreement which we will both sign in the presence of the traders now present. After we know the terms we will fill it up, and have it read and interpreted to you.

Brothers: Those posts are intended as a benefit to you. The old chiefs now present must see that their situation improves by communication with the whites. It is the intention of the United States to establish factories at those posts, in which the Indians may procure all their things at a cheaper and better rate then they do now, or than your traders can afford to sell them to you, as they are single men who come far in small boats. But your fathers are many and strong; they will come with a strong arm, in large boats. There will also be chiefs here, who can attend to the wants of their brothers, without your sending or going all the way to St. Louis; they will see the traders that go up your rivers, and know that they are good men.

Brothers: Another object your father has at heart, is to endeavor to make peace between you and the Chipeways.You have now been a long time at war, and when will you stop — If neither side will lay down the hatchet, your paths will always be red with blood; but if you will consent to make peace, and suffer your father to bury the hatchet between you, I will endeavor to bring down some of the Chipeway chiefs with me to St. Louis, where the good work can be completed under the auspices of your mutual father. I am much pleased to see that the young warriors have halted to hear my words this day; and as I know it is hard for a warrior to be struck and not strike again, I will send word to the chiefs by the first Chipeway I meet, that, if they have not yet felt your tomahawk, it is not because you have not the legs or the hearts of men, but because you have listened to the voice of your father.

Brothers: If their chiefs do not listen to the voice of their father, and continue to commit murders on you and our traders, they will call down the vengeance of the Americans;for they are not like a blind man walking into the fire. They were once at war with us, and joined to all the northern Indians; they were defeated at Roche De Boeuf,and were obliged to sue for peace; that peace we granted them. They know we are not children, but, like all wise people, are slow to shed blood.

Brothers: Your old men probably know that about 30 years ago we were subject to and governed by the king of the English; but he not treating us like children, we would no longer acknowledge him as father; and after ten years’ war, in which he lost 100,000 men, he acknowledged us a free and independent nation. They know that not many years since we received Detroit, Michilimackinac, and all the posts on the lakes from the English; and now — but the other day — Louisiana from the Spanish [French]; so that we put one foot on the sea at the east and the other on the sea at the west; and if once children, are now men. Yet, I think the traders who come from Canada are bad birds amongst the Chipeways, and instigate them to make war on their red brothers the Sioux, in order to prevent our traders from going high up the Mississippi. This I shall inquire into, and if it be so, shall warn those persons of their ill conduct.

Brothers: Mr. Choteau was sent by your father to the Osage nation, with one of his young chiefs.[V-5] He sailed some days before me, and had not time to procure the medals which I am told he promised to send up; but they will be procured.

Brothers: I wish you to have some of your head chiefs ready to go down with me in the spring. From the head of the St. Pierre also, such other chiefs as you may think proper,to the number of four or five. When I pass here on my wayI will send you word at what time you will meet me at the Prairie des Chiens.

Brothers: I expect that you will give orders to all your young warriors to respect my flag, and its protection whichI may extend to the Chipeway chiefs who may come down with me in the spring; for were a dog to run to my lodge for safety, his enemy must walk over me to hurt him.

Brothers: Here is a flag, which I wish to send to the Gens de Feuilles, to show them they are not forgotten by their father. I wish the comrade of their chief to take it on himself to deliver it with my words.

Brothers: I am told that hither to the traders have made a practice of selling rum to you. All of you in your right senses must know that it is injurious, and occasions quarrels, murders, etc., amongst yourselves. For this reason your father has thought proper to prohibit the traders from selling you any rum. Therefore, I hope my brothers the chiefs, when they know of a trader who sells an Indian rum,will prevent that Indian from paying his [that trader’s] credit. This will break up the pernicious practice and oblige your father. But I hope you will not encourage your young men to treat our traders ill from this circumstance, or from a hope of the indulgence formerly experienced; but make your complaints to persons in this country, who will be authorized to do you justice.

Brothers: I now present you with some of your father’s tobacco and other trifling things, as a memorandum of my good will; and before my departure I will give you some liquor to clear your throats.


Art 5. The Sioux Treaty[V-6] of Sept. 23d, 1805. (Part ofOrig. No. 3, pp. 8, 9.)

Whereas, at a conference held between the United States of America and the Sioux nation of Indians: lieutenant Z. M. Pike, of the army of the United States, and the chiefs and the warriors of said tribe, have agreed to the following articles, which, when ratified and approved of by the proper authority, shall be binding on both parties.

Art. 1. That the Sioux nation grant unto the UnitedStates, for the purpose of establishment of military posts, nine miles square at the mouth of the St. Croix,[*] also from below the confluence of the Mississippi and St. Peters up the Mississippi to include the falls of St. Anthony, extending nine miles on each side of the river, that the Sioux nation grants to the United States the full sovereignty and power over said district for ever.

[*]My demand was one league below: their reply was " from below." — I imagine (without iniquity) they may be made to agree. [Orig. Note.]

Art. 2. That, in consideration of the above grants, theUnited States shall pay (filled up by the senate with 2000dollars.)

Art. 3. The United States promise, on their part, to permit the Sioux to pass and repass, hunt, or make other use of the said districts as they have formerly done without any other exception than those specified in article first.

In testimony whereof we, the undersigned,have hereunto set our hands and seals, at the mouth of the river St. Peters, on the23d day of September, 1805.

Z. M. Pike, 1st lieut.
and agent at the above conference.
(L. S.)
Le Petit Corbeau,   his
X
mark
(L. S.)
Way Ago Enagee,   his
X
mark
(L. S.)


Art. 6. Letter, Pike to Wilkinson. (Orig. No. 4, pp. 9-13.)

St. Peters, Nine Miles below the Falls
of St. Anthony
, Sept. 23d, 1805.

Dear General:

I arrived here two days since, but shall not be able to depart before day after to-morrow. Three of my men have been up to view the falls, but their reports are so contradictory that no opinion can be formed from them.

All the young warriors of the two villages of Sioux near this place, and many chiefs, had marched against the Chipeways,to revenge a stroke made on their people, the very day after their return from their visit to the Illinois; ten persons were then killed on this ground. I yesterday saw the mausoleum in which all their bodies are deposited, and which is yet daily marked with the blood of those who swear to revenge them. But a runner headed them, andyesterday they all arrived — about 250 persons, in company with those who were in the ponds gathering rice. Amidstthe yelling of the mourners and the salutes of the warriorsthere was a scene worthy the pen of a Robertson [qu. Rev.Wm. Robertson, the Scottish historian, b. 1721, d. 1793 — ]

To-day I held a council on the beach, and made them aspeech, in which I touched on a variety of subjects; but the principal points were, obtaining the lands as specified in the within articles,[V-7] making peace with the Chipeways, and granting such [Chipeway] chiefs as might accompany me down to visit you a safe conduct through their [Sioux]country. These ends were accomplished. You will perceive that we have obtained about 100,000 acres for a song. You will please to observe, General, that the 2d article, relative to consideration, is blank. The reasons for it were as follows: I had to fee privately two of the chiefs, and beside that to make them presents at the council of articles which would in this country be valued at $200, and the others about $50; part of these things were private property purchased here, such as a few scarlet shrouds [strouds], etc. These I was not furnished by the United States; and although the chiefs in the council presented me with the land,yet it is possible your Excellency may think proper to insert the amount of those articles as the considerations to be specified in Article 2d. They have bound me up to many assurances that the posts shall be established; also, that if the Chipeways are obstinate, and continue to kill the Indians who bear our flags (the Chipeways on the Upper Mississippi bearing the English flag) and our traders, we will take them in hand and teach them to lay down the hatchet,as we have once already done. This I was the rather induced to say, as there were some persons present who,although trading under your licenses, I know to be British subjects. A chief by the name of Elan Levie [ — ‰lan Levé[V-8]], then told me to look round on those young warriors on the beach; that not only they, but those of six villages more, were at our command. If possible, I will endeavor to note down their several speeches, and show them you on my return.

I have not a doubt of making Lake Sable [Sandy lake] in pretty good season; but they inform me the source of the river is in Lake La Sang Sue [Leech lake], about 60 leagues further. This I must also see, and hope the General approves of my determination. At those two lakes there are establishments of the N. W. Company. These are both in our country, and time and circumstances only can determine in what manner I shall conduct myself toward them.[*]Mr.[Hugh] M’ Gillis, whose father was a refugee and had his estate confiscated by the Americans, has charge of those factories. He, they say, is a sworn enemy of the UnitedStates. This was told me by a man who I expect was a friend of the N. W. Company; but it had quite a contrary effect to what he intended it to have, as I am determined,should he attempt anything malicious toward me — open force he dare not — to spare no pains to punish him. In fact, the dignity and honor of our government requires that they should be taught to gather their skins in quiet, but even then not in a clandestine manner. Added to this, they are the very instigators of the war between the Chipeways and Sioux, in order that they may monopolize the trade of the Upper Mississippi.

[*] Incorrect — he being a Scotchman, a gentleman, and a man of honor; but this was the information I received at the St. Peters. [Orig. Note.]

The chiefs who were at Saint Louis this spring gave up their English medals to Mr. Chouteau. He promised them to obtain American medals in return, and send them up by some officer. They applied to me for them, and said they were their commissions — their only distinguishing mark from the other warriors. I promised them that I would write you on the occasion, and that you would remedy the evil. The chiefs were very loath to sign the articles relative to the land, asserting that their word of honor for the giftwas sufficient, that it was an impeachment of their probity to require them to bind themselves further, etc. This is a small sample of their way of thinking.

I must mention something to your Excellency relative to the man recommended to me by Mr. Chouteau as interpreter.At the time he solicited this employ he was engaged to Mr. [Robert] Dickson, and on my arrival at the Prairie [du Chien] was gone up the St. Peters. I understand he is to be recommended for the appointment of interpreter to the United States in this quarter. On the contrary, I beg leave to recommend for that appointment Mr. Joseph Reinville,who served as interpreter for the Sioux last spring at the Illinois, and who has gratuitously and willingly, by permission of Mr. [James] Frazer, to whom he is engaged,served as my interpreter in all my conferences with theSioux. He is a man respected by the Indians, and I believe an honest one. I likewise beg leave to recommend to your attention Mr. Frazer, one of the two gentlemen who dined with you, and was destined for the Upper Mississippi. He waited eight or ten days at Prairie [du Chien] for me,detained his interpreter, and thenceforward has continued to evince a zeal to promote the success of my expedition by every means in his power. He is a Vermonter born, and,although not possessing the advantages of a polished education,inherits that without which an education serves but to add to frivolity of character — candor, bravery, and that amorpatria which distinguishes the good of every nation, from Nova Zembla to the [Equatorial] line.

Finding that the traders were playing the devil with their rum, I yesterday in council informed the Indians that their father had prohibited the selling of liquor to them, and that they would oblige him and serve themselves if they would prevent their young men from paying the credits of any trader who sold rum to them, at the same time charging the chiefs to treat them well; as their father, although good,would not again forgive them, but punish with severity any injuries committed on their traders. This, I presume, General, is agreeable to the spirit of the laws. Mr. Frazer immediately set the example, by separating his spirits from the merchandise in his boats, and returning it to the Prairie, although it would materially injure him if the other traders retained and sold theirs. In fact, unless there are some persons at our posts here, when established, who have authority effectually to stop the evil by confiscating the liquors, etc., it will still be continued by the weak and malevolent.

I shall forbear giving you a description of this place until my return, except only to observe that the position for this post is on the point [where Fort Snelling now stands],between the two rivers, which equally commands both; and for that at the St. Croix, on the hill on the lower side of the entrance, on the E. bank of the Mississippi [now Prescott,Pierce Co., Wis.]. Owing to cloudy weather, etc., I have taken no observation here; but the head of Lake Pepin is in 44° 58´ 8´´ N., and we have made very little northing since. The Mississippi is 130 yards wide, and the St. Peters 80 yards at their confluence.

Sept. 24th. This morning Little Corbeau came to see me from the village, he having recovered an article which I suspected had been taken by the Indians. He told me many things which the ceremony of the council would not permit his delivering there; and added, he must tell me that Mr.Roche, who went up the river St. Peters, had in his presence given two kegs of rum to the Indians. The chief asked him why he did so, as he knew it was contrary to the orders of his father, adding that Messrs. Mareir and Tremer[V-9] had left their rum behind them, but that he alone had rum, contrary to orders. Roche then gave the chief 15 bottles of rum,as I suppose to bribe him to silence. I presume he should be taught the impropriety of his conduct when he applies for his license next year.

Above the Falls of St. Anthony, Sept. 26th.

The cloudy weather still continues, and I have not been able to take the latitude. Mr. Frazer has been kind enough to send two of his people across from the Sioux town on theSt. Peters for my dispatches, and the place being dangerous for them, I must haste to dispatch them. Of course, General,the following short sketch of the falls will merely be from le coup d’ — uil. The place where the river falls over the rocks appears to be about 15 feet perpendicular, the sheet being broken by one large island on the E. and a small one on the W., the former commencing below the shoot and extending 500 yards above; the river then falls through a continued bed of rocks, with a descent of at least 50 feet perpendicular in the course of half a mile. Thence to theSt. Peters, a distance of 11 miles by water, there is almost one continued rapid, aggravated by the interruption of 12 small islands. The carrying-place has two hills, one of 25 feet, the other of 12, with an elevation of 45°, and is about three-fourths of a mile in length. Above the shoot, the river is of considerable width; but below, at this time, I can easily cast a stone over it. The rapid or suck continues about half a mile above the shoot, when the water becomes calm and deep. My barges are not yet over, but my trucks are preparing, and I have not the least doubt of succeeding.

The general, I hope, will pardon the tautologies and egotisms of my communications, as he well knows Indian affairs are productive of such errors, and that in a wilderness,detached from the civilized world, everything, even if of little import, becomes magnified in the eyes of the beholder. When I add that my hands are blistered inworking over the rapids, I presume it will apologize for the manner and style of my communications.

I flatter myself with hearing from you at the Prairie, on my way down.

I am, General,
Your obedient servant,
[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Lt.

General Wilkinson.


Art. 7.[V-10] Instructions, Pike to Sergeant Henry Kennerman.(Orig. No. 16, pp. 33, 34.)

Pine Creek Rapids, Oct. 1st, 1805.

You are to remain here with the party under your command,subject to the following instructions: Your guards to consist of one non-commissioned officer and three privates,yourself mounting in regular rotation, making one sentinel by day and by night; until your position is inclosed by pickets, every man is to be employed on that object;after which Sparks is to be employed in hunting; but this will by no means excuse him from his tour of guard at night when in the stockade, but he must be relieved during the day by another man.

Should any Indians visit you previous to having your works complete, divide your men between the two blockhouses,and on no conditions suffer a savage to enter the one where the stores are, and not more than one or two into the other; but should you be so fortunate as not to be discovered until your works are completed, you may admit three, without arms, and no more, to enter at once, at the same time always treating them with as much friendship as is consistent with your own safety.

You are furnished with some tobacco to present them with, but on no condition are you ever to give them one drop of liquor; inform them that I have taken it all with me.From the arrangements I have made with the Sioux it is presumable they will treat you with friendship; but the Chipeways may be disposed to hostilities, and, should you be attacked, calculate on surrendering only with your life. Instruct your men not to fire at random, nor ever, unless the enemy is near enough to make him a point-blank shot. This you must particularly attend to, and punish the first man found acting in contradiction thereto. The greatest economy must be used with the ammunition and provisions. Of the latter I shall furnish Sparks his proportion; and at anytime should a man accompany him for a day’s hunt, furnish him with four or five balls and extra powder, and on his return take what is left away from him. The provisions must be issued agreeably to the following proportion: For four days N. 80 lbs. of fresh venison, elk, or buffalo, or 60 lbs. fresh bear meat, with one quart of salt for that period.The remainder of what is killed keep frozen in the open air as long as possible, or salt and smoke it, so as to lay up meat for my party and us all to descend the river with. If you are obliged, through the failure of your hunter, to issue out of our reserved provisions, you will deliver, for four days, 18 lbs. of pork or bacon, and 18 lbs. of flour only. This will be sufficient, and must in no instance be exceeded. No whisky will be issued after the present barrel is exhausted, at half a gill per man per day.

Our boats are turned up near your gate. You will make a barrel of pitch, and give them a complete repairing to be ready for us to descend in.

I have delivered to you my journals and observations to this place, with a letter accompanying them to his Excellency,General James Wilkinson, which, should I not return by the time hereafter specified, you will convey to him and deliver personally, requesting his permission to deliver the others committed to your charge.

You will observe the strictest discipline and justice in your command. I expect the men will conduct themselves in such a manner that there will be no complaints made on my return, and that they will be ready to account to a higher tribunal. The date of my return is uncertain; but let no information or reports, except from under my own hand,induce you to quit this place until one month after the ice has broken up at the head of the river; when, if I am not arrived, it will be reasonable to suppose that some disastrousevents detain us, and you may repair to St. Louis. You are taught to discriminate between my baggage and UnitedStates’ property. The latter deliver to the assistant military agent at St. Louis, taking his receipts for the same; the former, if in your power, to Mrs. Pike.

Your party is regularly supplied with provisions, to include the 8th of December only, from which time you are entitled to draw on the United States.

[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Lt.


Art. 8. Letter, Pike to Hugh M’Gillis. (Orig. No. 5,pp. 14-16.)

N. W. Establishment on Leech Lake,Feb. [6th], 1805.

Sir:

As [you are] a proprietor of the N. W. Company and director of the Zond [Fond] du Lac department, I conceive it my duty as an officer of the United States, in whose territory you are, to address you solely on the subject of the many houses under your instructions. As a member of the greatest commercial nation in the world, and of a company long renowned for their extent of connections and greatness of views, you cannot be ignorant of the rigor of the laws of the duties on imports of a foreign power.

Mr. Jay’s treaty, it is true, gave the right of trade with the savages to British subjects in the United States territories,but by no means exempted them from paying the duties,obtaining licenses, and subscribing unto all the rules and restrictions of our laws. I find your establishments at every suitable place along the whole extent of the south side ofLake Superior to its head, thence to the source of the Mississippi,and down Red River, and even extending to the center of our newly acquired territory of Louisiana, in which it will probably yet become a question between the two governments,whether our treaties will authorize British subjects to enter into the Indian trade on the same footing asin the other parts of our frontiers, this not having been an integral part of the United States at the time of said treaty.Our traders to the south, on the Lower Mississippi, complain to our government, with justice, that the members of the N. W. Company encircle them on the frontiers of ourN. W. territory, and trade with the savages upon superior terms to what they can afford, who pay the duties on their goods imported from Europe, and subscribe to the regulations prescribed by law.

These representations have at length attracted the attention of our government to the object in question, and, with an intention to do themselves as well as citizens justice, they last year took some steps to ascertain the facts and make provision against the growing evil. With this, and also with some geographical and local objects in view, was I dispatched with discretionary orders, with a party of troops, to the source of the Mississippi. I have found, Sir, your commerce and establishments extending beyond our most exaggerated ideas; and in addition to the injury done our revenue by evasion of the duties, other acts done which are more particularly injurious to the honor and dignity of our government.The transactions alluded to are the presenting medals of his Britannic Majesty, and flags of the said government,to the chiefs and warriors resident in the territory of the United States. As political subjects are strictly prohibited to our traders, what would be the ideas of the executive to see foreigners making chiefs, and distributing flags,the standard of an European power — The savages being accustomed to look on that standard, which was the only prevailing one for years, as that which alone has authority in the country, it would not be in the least astonishing to see them revolt from the United States’ limited subjection which is claimed over them by the American government, and thereby be the cause of their receiving a chastisement which, although necessary, yet would be unfortunate, as they would have been led astray by the policy of the traders of your country.

I must likewise observe, Sir, that your establishments, if properly known, would be looked on with an eye of dissatisfaction by our government, for another reason, viz., there being so many furnished posts, in case of a rupture between the two powers the English government would not fail to make use of those as places of deposit of arms, ammunition,etc., to be distributed to the savages who joined their arms,to the great annoyance of our territory, and the loss of the lives of many of our citizens. Your flags, Sir, when hoisted in inclosed works, are in direct contradiction of the law of nations, and their practice in like cases, which only admits of foreign flags being expanded on board of vessels, and at the residences of ambassadors or consuls. I am not ignorant of the necessity of your being in such a position as to protect yourself from the sallies of drunken savages,or the more deliberate plans of intending plunderers;and under those considerations have I considered your stockades.

You, and the company of which you are a member, must be conscious from the foregoing statement that strict justice would demand, and I assure you that the law directs, under similar circumstances, a total confiscation of your property,personal imprisonment, and fines. But having discretionary instructions and no reason to think the above conduct to be dictated through ill-will or disrespect to our government,and conceiving it in some degree departing from the character of an officer to embrace the first opportunity of executing those laws, I am willing to sacrifice my prospect of private advantage, conscious that the government looks not to its interest, but to its dignity in the transaction. I have therefore to request of you assurances on the following heads which, setting aside the chicanery of law, as a gentleman you will strictly adhere to:

1st. That you will make representations to your agents,at your headquarters on Lake Superior, of the quantity of goods wanted the ensuing spring for your establishments in the territory of the United States, in time sufficient (or asearly as possible) for them to enter them at the C. H. of Michilimackinac, and obtain a clearance and license to trade in due form.

2d. That you will give immediate instructions to all the posts in said territory under your direction, at no time and under no pretense whatever to hoist, or suffer to be hoisted,the English flag. If you conceive a flag necessary, you may make use of that of the United States, which is the only one which can be admitted.

3d. That you will on no further occasion present a flag or medal to an Indian, or hold councils with any of them on political subjects, or others foreign from that of trade;but that, on being applied to on those heads, you will refer them to the American agents, informing them that these are the only persons authorized to hold councils of a political nature with them.

There are many other subjects, such as the distribution of liquor, etc., which would be too lengthy to be treated of in detail. But the company will do well to furnish themselves with our laws regulating commerce with the savages,and regulate themselves in our territories accordingly.

I embrace this opportunity to acknowledge myself and command under singular obligations to yourself and agents for the assistance which you have rendered us, and the polite treatment with which we have been honored. With sentiments of high respect for the establishment and yourself,

I am, Sir,
Your obedient servant,
Z. M. Pike.

Hugh M’Gillis, Esq.,
Proprietor and Agent of the N. W. Company
established at Zond [Fond] Du Lac.


Started Here - Strickland

Art. 9. Letter, Hugh M’Gillis to Pike. (Orig. No. 6,pp. 17-19.)

Leech Lake, Feb. 15th, 1806.

Sir:

Your address presented on the 6th inst. has attracted my most serious consideration to the several objects of duties on importations; of presents made to, and our consultations with, Indians; of inclosing our stores and dwelling-houses;and finally, of the custom obtaining to hoist the British flag in the territory belonging to the United States of America. I shall at as early a period as possible present the agents of the N. W. Company with your representations regarding the paying duties on the importation of goods to be sent to our establishments within the bounds of the territory of the United States, as also their being entered at the custom house of Michilimackinac; but I beg to be allowed to present for consideration, that the major part of the goods necessary to be sent to the said establishments for the trade of the ensuing year, are now actually in our store sat Kamanitiguia, our headquarters on Lake Superior, and that it would cause us vast expense and trouble to be obliged to convey those goods back to Michilimackinac to be entered at the custom-house office. We therefore pray that the word of gentlemen with regard to the quantity and quality of the said goods, to be sent to said establishment,may be considered as equivalent to the certainty of a custom-house register. Our intention has never been to injure your traders, paying the duties established by law. We hope those representations to your government respecting our concerns with the Indians may have been dictated with truth, and not exaggerated by envy to prejudice our interests and to throw a stain on our character which may require time to efface from the minds of a people to whom we must ever consider ourselves indebted for that lenity of procedure of which the present is so notable a testimony. The inclosures to protect our stores and dwelling-houses from theinsults and barbarity of savage rudeness, have been erected for the security of my property and person in a country,till now, exposed to the wild will of the frantic Indians. We never formed the smallest idea that the said inclosures might ever be useful in the juncture of a rupture between the two powers, nor do we now conceive that such poor shifts will ever be employed by the British government in a country overshadowed with wood so adequate to every purpose. Forts might in a short period of time be built far superior to any stockades we may have occasion to erect.

STOPPED HERE ENGL 303

We were not conscious, Sir, of the error I acknowledgewe have been guilty of committing, by exhibiting to viewon your territory any standard of Great Britain. I will pledge myself to your government, that I will use myutmost endeavors, as soon as possible, to prevent the futuredisplay of the British flag, or the presenting of medals, orthe exhibiting to public view any other mark of Europeanpower, throughout the extent of territory known to belongto the dominion of the United States. The custom has long been established and we innocently and inoffensively,as we imagined, have conformed to it till the presentday.

Be persuaded that on no consideration shall any Indian be entertained on political subjects, or on any affairs foreign to our trade; and that reference shall be made to the American agents, should any application be made worthysuch reference. Be also assured that we, as a commercialcompany, must find it ever our interests to interfere as littleas possible with affairs of government in the course oftrade, ignorant as we are in this rude and distant countryof the political views of nations.

We are convinced that the inestimable advantages arisingfrom the endeavors of your government to establish a more peaceful course of trade in this part of the territory belonging to the United States are not acquired through the mereliberality of a nation, and we are ready to contribute to theexpense necessarily attending them. We are not averse topaying the common duties established by law, and will everbe ready to conform ourselves to all rules and regulationsof trade that may be established according to commonjustice.

I beg to be allowed to say that we have reason to hopethat every measure will be adopted to secure and facilitate the trade with the Indians; and these hopes seem to be confirmed beyond the smallest idea of doubt, when we seea man sent among us who, instead of private considerationsto pecuniary views, prefers the honor, dignity, and lenity ofhis government, and whose transactions are in every respectso conformable to equity. When we behold an armedforce ready to protect or chastise as necessity or policy maydirect, we know not how to express our gratitude to thatpeople whose only view seems to be to promote the happinessof all, the savages that rove over the wild confines oftheir domains not excepted.

It is to you, Sir, we feel ourselves most greatly indebted, whose claim to honor, esteem, and respect will ever be heldin high estimation by myself and associates. The dangerand hardships, by your fortitude vanquished and by yourperseverance overcome, are signal, and will ever be preservedin the annals of the N. W. Company. Were it solely fromconsideration of those who have exposed their lives in along and perilous march through a country where they hadevery distress to suffer, and many dangers to expect, — andthis with a view to establish peace in a savage country, — weshould think ourselves under the most strict obligation toassist them. But we know we are in a country where hospitalityand gratitude are to be considered above everyother virtue, and therefore have offered for their relief whatour poor means will allow: and, Sir, permit me to embracethis opportunity to testify that I feel myself highly honoredby your acceptance of such accommodations as my humbleroof could afford.

With great consideration and high respect for the governmentof the United States, allow me to express my esteemand regard for yourself.

I am, Sir,
Your obedient humble servant,
[Signed] H. M’Gillis,
Of N. W. Company

Lieut. Pike,
1st. Regt. United States Infantry.


Art. 10. Speech, Pike to the Sauteaux, in a Council at LeechLake, Feb. 16th, 1806. (Orig. No. 7, pp. 19-22.)

Brothers: A few months since the Spaniards shut up the mouth of the Mississippi, and prevented the Americans from floating down to the sea. This your father, the Presidentof the United States, would not admit of. He thereforetook such measures as to open the river, remove theSpaniards from both sides of the Mississippi to a great distanceon the other side of the Missouri, and open the roadfrom the ocean of the east to that of the west. The Americansbeing then at peace with all the world, your greatfather, the President of the United States, began to lookround on his red children, in order to see what he could doto render them happy and sensible of his protection. Forthat purpose he sent two of his Captains, Lewis and Clark,up the Missouri, to pass on to the west sea, in order to seeall his new children, to go round the world that way, andreturn by water. They stayed the first winter at the Mandane’s[V-11]village, where you might have heard of them. Thisyear your great father directed his great war-chief (GeneralWilkinson) at St. Louis, to send a number of his youngwarriors up the Missouri, Illinois, Osage River, and othercourses, to learn the situation of his red children, to encouragethe good, punish the bad, and make peace between themall by persuading them to lay by the hatchet and follow theyoung warriors to St. Louis, where the great war-chief willopen their ears that they may hear the truth, and their eyes,to see what is right.

Brothers: I was chosen to ascend the Mississippi, tobear to his red children the words of their father; and theGreat Spirit has opened the eyes and ears of all the nationsthat I have passed to listen to my words. The Sauks andReynards are planting corn and raising cattle. The Winnebagoscontinue peaceable, as usual, and even the Sioux havelaid by the hatchet at my request. Yes, my brothers,the Sioux, who have so long and so obstinately waged waragainst the Chipeways, have agreed to lay by the hatchet,smoke the calumet, and become again your brothers, as theywere wont to be.[V-12]

Brothers: You behold the pipe of Wabasha as a proofof what I say. Little Corbeau, Tills [Fils] De Pinchow, andL’Aile Rouge had marched 250 warriors to revenge theblood of their women and children, slain last year at the St.Peters. I sent a runner after them, stopped their march,and met them in council at the mouth of the St. Peters,where they promised to remain peaceable until my return;and if the Ouchipawah [Chippewa] chiefs accompanied me,to receive them as brothers and accompany us to St. Louis,there to bury the hatchet and smoke the pipe in the presenceof our great war-chief; and to request him to punishthose who first broke the peace.

Brothers: I sent flags and a message up the St. Petersto the bands of Sioux on that river, requesting them toremain quiet, and not to go to war. The People of theLeaves [Gens des Feuilles] received my message and sentme word that they would obey; but the Yanctongs andSussitongs had left the St. Peters previous to my messagearriving, and did not receive it. When I left my fort theyhad appointed a day for 50 of their chiefs and warriors tocome and see me, but I could not wait for them; so that,as to their dispositions for peace or war, I cannot answerpositively.

Brothers: I have therefore come to fetch some of your approved chiefs with me to St. Louis.

Brothers: In speaking to you I speak to brave warriors.It is therefore not my intention to deceive you. Possiblywe may meet with some bad people who may wish to do usill; but if so, we will die together, certain that our fathers,the Americans, will settle with them for our blood.

Brothers: I find you have received from your traders English medals and flags. These you must deliver up, andyour chiefs who go with me shall receive others from theAmerican government, in their room.

Brothers: Traders have no authority to make chiefs; and in doing this they have done what is not right. It isonly great chiefs, appointed by your fathers, who have thatauthority. But at the same time you are under considerableobligations to your traders, who come over large waters,high mountains, and up swift falls, to supply you withclothing for your women and children, and ammunition foryour hunters, to feed you, and keep you from perishing withcold.

Brothers: Your chiefs should see your traders done justice, oblige your young men to pay their credits, andprotect them from insults; and your traders, on their part,must not cheat the Indians, but give them the value oftheir skins.

Brothers: Your father is going to appoint chiefs of hisown to reside among you, to see justice done to his whiteand red children, who will punish those who deserve punishment,without reference to the color of their skin.

Brothers: I understand that one of your young men killed an American at Red Lake last year, but the murderer is far off. Let him keep so — send him where wenever may hear of him more; for were he here I would be obliged to demand him of you, and make my young men shoot him. My hands on this journey are yet clear of blood — maythe Great Spirit keep them so!

Brothers: We expect, in the summer, soldiers to cometo the St. Peters. Your chiefs who go with me may eithercome up with them, or some traders who return sooner.They may make their selection.

Brothers: Your father finds that the rum with whichyou are supplied by the traders is the occasion of quarrels,murders, and bloodshed; and that, instead of buyingclothing for your women and children, you spend your skinsin liquor, etc. He has determined to direct his youngwarriors and chiefs to prohibit it, and keep it from amongyou. But I have found the traders here with a great dealof rum on hand. I have therefore given them permissionto sell what they have, that you may forget it by degrees,against next year, when none will be suffered to come in thecountry.


Art. 11. Speeches, Chippewa Chiefs[V-13] to Pike, at Leech Lake,Feb. 16th, 1806. (Orig. No. 8, pp. 22, 23.)

1st. Sucre of Red lake (Wiscoup).

My father: I have heard and understood the words ofour great father. It overjoys me to see you make peaceamong us. I should have accompanied you had my familybeen present, and would have gone to see my father, thegreat war-chief.

My father: This medal I hold in my hands I receivedfrom the English chiefs. I willingly deliver it up to you.Wabasha’s calumet, with which I am presented, I receivewith all my heart. Be assured that I will use my bestendeavors to keep my young men quiet. There is my calumet.I send it to my father the great war-chief. Whatdoes it signify that I should go to see him — Will not mypipe answer the same purpose —

My father: You will meet with the Sioux on yourreturn. You will make them smoke my pipe, and tell themthat I have let fall my hatchet.

My father: Tell the Sioux on the upper part of theriver St. Peters to mark trees with the figure of a calumet,that we of Red Lake who may go that way, should we seethem, may make peace with them, being assured of theirpacific disposition when we see the calumet marked on thetrees.

2d. The Chief de la Terre of Leech lake (Obigouitte).

My father: I am glad to hear that we and the Siouxare now brothers, peace being made between us. If I havereceived a medal from the English traders, it was not asa mark of rank or distinction, as I considered it, but merelybecause I made good hunts and paid my debts. Had Sucrebeen able to go and see our father, the great war-chief,I should have accompanied him; but I am determined togo to Michilimackinac next spring to see my brothers theAmericans.

3d. Geuelle Platte of Leech lake (Eskibugeckoge).

My father: My heart beat high with joy when I heardthat you had arrived, and that all the nations through whichyou passed had received and made peace among them.

My father: You ask me to accompany you to meet ourfather, the great war-chief. This I would willingly do, butcertain considerations prevent me. I have sent my calumetto all the Sauteaux who hunt round about, to assemble toform a war-party; should I be absent, they, when assembled,might strike those with whom we have made peace, andthus kill our brothers. I must therefore remain here toprevent them from assembling, as I fear that there aremany who have begun already to prepare to meet me. Ipresent you with the medal of my uncle here present. Hereceived it from the English chiefs as a recompense for hisgood hunts. As for me, I have no medal here; it is at mytent, and I will cheerfully deliver it up. That medal wasgiven me by the English traders, in consideration of somethingthat I had done; and I can say that three-fourths ofthose here present belong to me.

My father: I promise you, and you may confide inmy word, that I will preserve peace; that I bury myhatchet; and that even should the Sioux come and strikeme, for the first time I would not take up my hatchet; butshould they come and strike me a second time, I would digup my hatchet and revenge myself.


Art. 12. Extract of a letter, Pike to Robert Dickson, LowerRed Cedar Lake, Feb. 26th, 1806. (Orig. No. 9, pp. 23, 24.)

Mr. Grant was prepared to go on a trading voyage amongthe Fols Avoins; but that was what I could not by anymeans admit of, and I hope that, on a moment’s reflection,you will admit the justice of my refusal. For what couldbe a greater piece of injustice than for me to permit you tosend goods, illegally brought into the country, down intothe same quarter, to trade for the credits of men who havepaid their duties, regularly taken out licenses, and in otherrespects acted conformably to law — They might exclaimwith justice, "What! Lt. Pike, not content with sufferingthe laws to slumber when it was his duty to have executedthem, has now suffered the N. W. Company’s agents to comeeven here to violate them, and injure the citizens of theUnited States — certainly he must be corrupted to admit this."

This, Sir, would be the natural conclusion of all persons.


Art. 13. Letter, Pike to La Jeunesse. (Orig. No. 10, p. 24.)

Grand Isle, Upper Mississippi, Apr. 9th, 1806.

Sir:

Being informed that you have arrived here with an intentionof selling spirituous liquors to the savages of thisquarter, together with other merchandise under your charge,I beg leave to inform you that the sale of spirituous liquorson the Indian territories, to any savages whatsoever, is contraryto a law of the United States for regulating trade withthe savages and preserving peace on the frontiers; and thatnotwithstanding the custom has hitherto obtained on theUpper Mississippi, no person whatsoever has authoritytherefor. As the practice may have a tendency to occasionbroils and dissensions among the savages, thereby occasioningbloodshed and an infraction of the good understandingwhich now, through my endeavors, so happily exists, I have,at your particular request, addressed you this note in writing,informing you that in case of an infraction I shall conceiveit my duty, as an officer of the United States, to prosecuteaccording to the pains and penalties of the law.

I am, Sir,
With all due consideration,
Your obedient servant,
[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Lt.

Mr. La Jennesse.


Art. 14. Letter, Pike to Wilkinson. (Orig. No. 11, pp. 25, 26.)

Prairie De Chien, Apr. 18, 1806.

Dear General:

I arrived here within the hour, and as Mr. Jearreau, ofCahokia, embarks for St. Louis early to-morrow morning, Iembrace this opportunity to give a slight sketch of theevents of my expedition. Being obliged to steal the hoursfrom my repose, I hope the General will pardon the concisenessof my epistle.

I pushed forward last October with all eagerness, in hopesto make Lake De Sable, and return to St. Louis in theautumn. The weather was mild and promising until themiddle of the month, when a sudden change took place andthe ice immediately commenced running. I was then consciousof my inability to return, as the falls and other obstacleswould retain me until the river would close. I thenconceived it best to station part of my men, and push mydiscovery with the remainder on foot. I marched with 11soldiers and my interpreter, 700 miles, to the source of theMississippi, through (I may without vanity say) as manyhardships as almost any party of Americans ever experienced,by cold and hunger. I was on the communication of Redriver and the Mississippi, the former being a water of Hudson’sbay.[V-14] The British flag, which was expanded on somevery respectable positions, has given place to that of theUnited States wherever we passed; likewise, we have thefaith and honor of the N. W. Company for about $13,000duties this year; and by the voyage peace is establishedbetween the Sioux and Sauteurs. These objects I havebeen happy enough to accomplish without the loss of oneman, although once fired on. I expect hourly the Sussitongs,Yanctongs, Wachpecoutes, and three other bands ofSioux; some are from the head of the St. Peters, and somefrom the plains west of that river. From here I bring withme a few of the principal men only, agreeably to your orders;also, some chiefs of the Fols Avoins or Menomones, andWinebagos, the latter of whom have murdered three mensince my passing here last autumn. The murderers I shalldemand, and am in expectation of obtaining two, for whomI now have irons making, and expect to have them with meon my arrival. Indeed, Sir, the insolence of the savages inthis quarter is unbounded; and unless an immediate exampleis made, we shall certainly be obliged to enter into ageneral war with them.

My party has been some small check to them this winter,as I was determined to preserve the dignity of our flag, ordie in the attempt.

I presume, General, that my voyage will be productive ofmuch new, useful, and interesting information for our government,although detailed in the unpolished diction of asoldier of fortune.

The river broke up at my stockade, 600 miles above here,on the 7th inst., and Lake Pepin was passable for boats onlyon the 14th. Thus you may perceive, Sir, I have not beenslow in my descent, leaving all the traders behind me.From the time it will take to make my arrangements, andthe state of the water, I calculate on arriving at the cantonment[Belle Fontaine] on the 4th of May; and hope myGeneral will be assured that nothing but the most insurmountableobstacles shall detain me one moment.

N. B. I beg leave to caution the General against attendingto the reports of any individuals relating to this country,as the most unbounded prejudices and party rancor pervadealmost generally.

I am, dear Sir,
With great consideration,
Your obedient servant,
[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Lt.


Art. 15.[V-15] Speech, Pike to the Puants at Prairie Du Chien,Apr. 20th, 1806. (Part of Orig. No. 12, pp. 26, 27.)

Brothers: When I passed here last autumn I requestedto see you on my return. I am pleased to see you havelistened to my words. It pleased the Great Spirit to openthe ears of all the nations through which I passed, to hearand attend to the words of their father. Peace has beenestablished between two of the most powerful nations inthis quarter.

Not withstanding all this, some of your nation have beenbold enough to kill some of the white people. Not contentwith firing on the canoes descending the Ouiscousing lastautumn, they have killed a man on Rock river, when sittingpeaceably in his tent. They have also recently murdered ayoung man near this place, without any provocation whatever.As an officer of the United States, it is my duty todemand the murderers; and I do now demand them.

Brothers: In this action I am not influenced or urgedby any individual of this place, or the people generally; nomore than as it is my duty to give all our citizens all theprotection in my power. I will not deceive you. If theprisoners are delivered to me, I shall put them in irons,under my guards, and in all instances treat them as menguilty of a capital crime; on their arrival below, they willbe tried for their lives; and if it be proved they have killedthese people without provocation, in all probability theywill be put to death. If, on the contrary, it is proved thatthe whites were the aggressors, and it was only self-defence,it will be deemed justifiable, and they will be sent back totheir nation.

It becomes you to consider well whether in case of arefusal you are sufficiently powerful to protect these menagainst the power of the United States, which have always,since the treaty of 1795, treated all the savages as theirchildren; but if they are obliged to march troops to punishthe many murders committed on their citizens, then theinnocent will suffer with the guilty.

My demand will be reported in candor and truth below;when the general will take such steps as he may deemproper. But I hope, for the sake of your innocent womenand children, you will do us and yourselves justice. I wasdirected to invite a few chiefs down with me to St. Louis.Many of different bands are about to descend with me. Inow give an invitation to two or three of your principalmen to descend with me. Whatever are your determinations,I pledge the faith of a soldier for a safe conduct backto your nation. At present, I am not instructed to act byforce to procure those men, therefore you will consideryourselves as acting without restraint, and under free deliberations.

They replied that they thanked me for the generous andcandid manner in which I had explained myself, and thatthey would give me an answer to-morrow.


Art. 16. Further Conferences with Indians at Prairie duChien, Apr. 21st, 1806. (Part of Orig. No. 12, pp. 27-29.)

The Puants met me in council, agreeably to promise.Karamone, their chief, addressed me, and said they hadcome to reply to my demand of yesterday. He requestedthat I, with the traders, would listen. A soldier calledLittle Thunder then arose and said: "The chiefs were forgiving up the murderer present; but it was the opinion ofthe soldiers that they should themselves take him with theothers to their father. But if I preferred their taking onedown now, they would do it; if, on the contrary, I expectedall three, they would immediately depart in pursuit of theothers, and bring them all together to their father. That ifhe did not bring them he would deliver himself up to theAmericans." I replied: "He must not attempt to deceive.That I had before told him that I was not authorized toseize their men by force of arms, but that I wished to knowexplicitly the time when we might expect them at St. Louis,in order that our general should know what steps to takein case they did not arrive. That the consequence of a non-compliancewould be serious to themselves and their children.Also that they had recently hoisted a British flagnear this place which, had I been here, I should have prevented.I advised them to bring their British flags andmedals down to St. Louis, to deliver them up, and receiveothers in exchange." Their reply was: "In ten days to thePrairie, and thence to St. Louis in ten days more."

Held a council with the Sioux, in which the chiefs of theYanctongs, Sussitongs, Sioux of the head of the De Moyen,and part of the Gens Du Lac were present. Wabasha firstspoke, in answer to my speech, wherein I had recapitulatedthe conduct of the Sauteurs, their desire and willingness forpeace, their arrangements for next summer, the pipes theyhad sent, etc. Also, the wish of the general for some ofthe chiefs to descend below. Recommended the situationand good intentions of the young chiefs at the mouth ofthe St. Peters, to the others; and that they should givethem assistance to keep the bad men in awe.

They all acquiesced in the peace with the Sauteurs, butsaid generally they doubted their bad faith, as they hadexperienced it many a time. Nez Corbeau said he had beenaccused of being hired to kill Mr. Dixon [Dickson], but hehere solemnly denied ever having been instigated to anysuch action.

Tonnere Rouge then arose and said: Jealousy was in agreat measure the principal cause of his descending. Thatif any trader ever had cause to complain of him, now lethim do it publicly. That last year an officer went up theMissouri, gave flags and medals, made chiefs, and playedthe devil and all. That this year liquor was restricted [forbidden]to the Indians on the Louisiana side, and permittedon this. He wished to know the reason of those arrangements.

I replied that the officer who ascended the Missouri wasauthorized by their father; and that to make chiefs of them,etc., was what I now invited them down for. As to liquor,it was too long an explanation to give them here, but itwould be explained to them below; and that in a very shorttime liquor would be restricted on both sides of the river.

The Puants in the evening came to the house, and Macraragah,alias Merchant, spoke: That last spring he hadembarked to go down to St. Louis; but at De Buques[Dubuque’s] the Reynards gave back. That when he sawme last autumn he gave me his hand without shame; butsince it had pleased the father of life to cover them withshame, they now felt themselves miserable. They imploredme to present their flags and medals to the general, as aproof of their good intentions; and when I arrived at St.Louis, to assure the general they were not far behind. Thechiefs and the soldiers would follow with the murderers;but begged I would make their road clear, etc. Deliveredhis pipe and flag.

Karamone then spoke, with apparent difficulty; assuredme of the shame, disgrace, and distress of their nation, andthat he would fulfill what the others had said; said that hesent by me the medal of his father, which he consideredhimself no longer worthy to wear — putting it around myneck, trembling — and begged me to intercede with thegeneral in their favor, etc.

I assured him that the American was a generous nation,not confounding the innocent with the guilty; that whenthey had delivered up the three or four dogs who hadcovered them with blood, we would again look on them asour children; advised them to take courage that, if theydid well, they should be treated well; said that I would tellthe general everything relative to the affair; also, theirrepentance, and determination to deliver themselves andthe murderers, and that I would explain about their flagsand medals.


Art. 17. Letter, Pike to Campbell and Fisher. (Orig. No. 13,pp. 29, 30.)

(Notice to Messrs. Campbell and Fisher, for taking depositionsagainst the murderers of the Puant nation.)

Prairie des Chiens, Apr. 20th, 1806.

Gentlemen:

Having demanded of the Puants the authors of the lateatrocious murders, and understanding that it is their intentionto deliver them to me, I have to request of you, asmagistrates of this territory, that you will have all thedepositions of those facts taken which it is in your powerto procure; and if at any future period, previous to the finaldecisions of their fate, further proofs can be obtained, thatyou will have them properly authenticated and forwardedto his Excellency, General Wilkinson.

I am, Gentlemen,
With respect,
Your obedient servant,
[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Lt.


Art. 18. Letter, Pike to Wilkinson. (Orig. No. 14,pp. 30, 31.)

Fort St. Louis, May 26th, 1806.

Dear Sir:

I have hitherto detained the medals and flags, intendingto present them to you at the final conclusion of myvouchers on the subject of my correspondence with thesavages. But in order that the general might know ofwhom I had obtained medals and flags, I gave him a memorandumwhen I handed in my vouchers on the subject ofthe N. W. Company. Now I have thought proper to sendthem by the bearer, marked with the names of the chiefsfrom whom I obtained them.

I also send you a pipe and beaver robe of Tonnere Rouge,as they are the handsomest of any which I received on thewhole route. I have several other pipes, two sacks, and onerobe; but as they bore no particular message, I conceivedthe general would look on it as a matter of no consequence;indeed, none except the Sauteurs’ [presents] were accompaniedby a talk, but just served as an emblem of the goodwill of the moment. I likewise send the skins of the lynxand brelaw [badger], as the general may have an opportunityto forward them.

Some gentlemen have promised me a mate for my dog;if I obtain him, the pair, or the single one with the sleigh,is at the general’s service, to be transmitted to the States aswe determined on doing. I mentioned in my memorandumsthe engagements I was under relative to the flags or medals,and should any early communications be made to thatcountry, I hope the subject may not be forgotten. I havelabeled each article with the name of those from whomI obtained them; also the names of the different animals.

I am, sir,
With esteem and high consideration,
Your obedient servant,
[Signed] Z. M. Pike, Lt.

General James Wilkinson.

My faith was pledged to the savage chiefs for the replacingof the medals and flags of the British government whichthey surrendered me, by others of the same magnitude ofthe United States; but owing to the change of agents, anda variety of circumstances, it was never fulfilled. This hasleft a number of the Sioux and Sauteur chiefs without theirdistinguishing marks of dignity, and has induced them tolook on my conduct toward them as a premeditated fraud.This would render my life in danger should I ever returnamongst them, and the situation of any other officer whoshould presume to make a similar demand extremely delicate;besides, it has compromitted with those savage warriorsthe faith of our government, which, to enable anygovernment ever to do good, should be held inviolate.[V-16]


Art. 19. Letter,[V-17] Pike to Wilkinson. (Orig. No. 15,pp. 31-33.)

Bellefontaine, July 2d, 1806.

Dear Sir:

I have at length finished all my reports, observations, andjournals, which arose from my late voyage to the source ofthe Mississippi, and hope they may prove interesting, fromthe information on different subjects which they contain.

I perceive that I differ materially from Captain Lewis[V-18] inmy account of the numbers, manners, and morals of theSioux. But our reception by that nation at the first interviewbeing so different, it no doubt left an impression onour minds, which may have, unknown to ourselves, givena cast to our observations. I will not only vouch for theauthenticity of my account as to numbers, arms, etc., frommy own notes, but from having had them revised and correctedby a gentleman[V-19] of liberal education, who has resided18 years in that nation, speaks their language, and for someyears past has been collecting materials for their natural andphilosophical history.

I have not attempted to give an account of nations ofIndians whom I did not visit, except the Assinniboins, whom,from their intimate connection with the Sioux, in a linealpoint of view, it would have been improper to leave out ofthe catalogue.

The correctness of the geographical parts of the voyageI will vouch for, as I spared neither time, fatigue, nordanger, to see for myself every part connected with myimmediate route.

As the general already knows, at the time I left St. Louisthere were no instruments proper for celestial observations,excepting those which he furnished me, which were inadequateto taking the longitude; neither had I the propertables or authors to accomplish that object, though it can nodoubt be ascertained by various charts at different points ofmy route. Nor had I proper time-pieces or instruments formeteorological observations. Those made were from animperfect instrument which I purchased in the town of St.Louis.

I do not possess the qualifications of the naturalist, andeven had they been mine, it would have been impossibleto gratify them to any great extent, as we passed withrapidity over the country we surveyed, which was coveredwith snow six months out of the nine I was absent. Andindeed, my thoughts were too much engrossed in makingprovision for the exigencies of the morrow to attempt ascience which requires time, and a placidity of mind whichseldom fell to my lot.

The journal in itself will have little to strike the imagination,being but a dull detail of our daily march, andcontaining many notes which should have come into thegeographical part; others of observations on the savagecharacter, and many that were never intended to be includedin my official report.

The daily occurrences written at night, frequently by firelight,when extremely fatigued, and the cold so severe as tofreeze the ink in my pen, of course have little claim to eleganceof expression or style; but they have truth to recommendthem, which, if always attended to, would strip thepages of many of our journalists of their most interestingoccurrences.

The general will please to recollect also, that I hadscarcely returned to St. Louis before the [Arkansaw] voyagenow in contemplation was proposed to me; and that, aftersome consideration my duty, and inclination in some respects,induced me to undertake it. The preparations formy new voyage prevented the possibility of my paying thatattention to the correction of my errors that I should otherwisehave done. This, with the foregoing reasons, will, Ihope, be deemed a sufficient apology for the numerouserrors, tautologies, and egotisms which will appear.

I am, dear General,
With great respect,
Your obedient servant,
[Signed] Z. M. Pike,
Lt. 1st Regt. Infty.

General James Wilkinson.

CHAPTER VI.

COMMERCE OF THE MISSISSIPPI.[VI-1]

Observations on the trade, views, and policy of the NorthWest Company, and the national objects connected withtheir commerce, as it interests the Government of theUnited States.[VI-2]

The fur-trade in Canada has always been considered anobject of the first importance to that colony, and hasbeen cherished by the respective governors of that provinceby every regulation in their power, under both the Frenchand English administrations. The great and almost unlimitedinfluence the traders of that country acquired over thesavages was severely felt, and will long be remembered bythe citizens on our frontiers. Every attention was paid bythe cabinet of St. James, in our treaty with Great Britain, tosecure to their Canadian subjects the privilege of the Indiantrade within our territories, and with what judgment theyhave improved the advantages obtained by the mothercountry, time will soon unfold.

In the year 1766, the trade was first extended fromMichilimackinac, to the northwest, by a few desperateadventurers, whose mode of life on the voyage, and shortresidence in civilized society, obtained for them the appellationof Coureurs des Bois. From those trifling beginningsarose the present North West Company, who, notwithstandingthe repeated attacks made on their trade, havewithstood every shock, and are now, by the coalition of thelate X. Y. Company, established on so firm a basis as tobid defiance to every opposition which can be made byprivate individuals.

They, by a late purchase of the king’s posts in Canada,extend their line of trade from Hudson’s Bay to the St.Lawrence, and up that river on both sides to the Lakes;thence to the head of Lake Superior, at which place theNorth West Company have their headquarters; thence tothe source of Red river and all its tributary streams throughthe country to the Missouri; through the waters of LakeWinipie to the Saskashawin; on that river to its source;up Elk river to the Lake of the Hills; up Peace river tothe Rocky mountains; from the Lake of the Hills [Lac desButtes, old French name of Lake Athapasca] up Slave riverto Slave Lake. This year they have dispatched a Mr. [(notSir) Alexander] Mackenzie on a voyage of trade and discoverydown Mackenzie’s river to the north sea; and also a Mr.M’Coy,[VI-3] to cross the Rocky mountains and proceed to thewestern ocean with the same objects in view.

They have had a gentleman by the name of [David]Thompson[VI-4] making a geographical survey of the northwestpart of the continent; who, for three years, with an astonishingspirit of enterprise and perseverance, passed over allthat extensive and unknown country. His establishment,although not splendid, the mode of traveling not admittingit, was such as to admit of unlimited expenses in everythingnecessary to facilitate his inquiries; and he is now engagedin digesting the important results of his enterprise.

I find from the observations and suggestions of Mr. Thompson,when at the [Julian] source of the Mississippi, that itwas his opinion the line of limits between the United Statesand Great Britain must run such a course from the head ofthe Lake of the Woods as to touch the source of the Mississippi;and this I discovered to be the opinion of the NorthWest Company, who, we may suppose or reasonably conclude,speak the language held forth by their government.The admission of this pretension will throw out of ourterritory all the upper part of Red river, and nearly two-fifthsof the territory of Louisiana. Whereas, if the line berun due west from the head of the Lake of the Woods, itwill cross Red river nearly at the entrance of Reed river,and, it is conjectured, strike the western ocean at Birch Bay,in Queen Charlotte Sound. Those differences of opinion, itis presumed, might be easily adjusted between the twogovernments at the present day; but it is believed thatdelays, by unfolding the true value of the country, mayproduce difficulties which do not at present exist.

The North West Company have made establishments atseveral places on the south side of Lake Superior, and onthe head waters of the Sauteaux and St. Croix, which dischargeinto the Mississippi. The first I met with on thevoyage up was at Lower Red Cedar Lake, about 150 milesabove Isle de Corfeau [Corbeau], on the east side of theriver, and distant therefrom six miles. It is situated on thenorth point of the lake, and consists of log buildings, flankedby picketed bastions on two of its angles. The next establishmentI met with was situated on Sandy Lake: for adescription of which, see document [herewith] marked A.Midway between Sandy Lake and Leech Lake is a smallhouse not worthy of notice [Grant’s: see note52 p. 144].On the southwest side of the latter lake, from the outlet ofthe Mississippi, stand the headquarters of the Fond du Lacdepartment: for information relative to which, have referenceto document marked B. Here resides the director ofthis department. In document C is a recapitulation of thespecific articles of 115 packs of peltry, which will give anidea of the whole, amounting per said voucher to 233 packsper annum in the Fond du Lac department. Document Dwill explain the relative price of goods in that district; butthe trading prices are various, according to situations andcircumstances. Voucher E shows the number of men,women, and children in the service of the North WestCompany in the district aforesaid, with their pay per annum,etc. This department brings in annually 40 canoes; fromwhich, by a calculation made by a gentleman [GeorgeAnderson] of veracity and information, who has been 18years in the Indian trade and in the habit of importinggoods by Michilimackinac, it appears that the annualamount of duties would be about $13,000. The LowerRed river, which I conceive to be within our territory, wouldyield about half that sum, $6,500, and the Hudson BayCompany’s servants, who import by the way of LakeWinipie, $6,500 more.

Thus is the United States defrauded annually of about$26,000. From my observations and information, I think itwill be an easy matter to prevent the smuggling of the Fonddu Lac department, by establishing a post with a garrisonof 100 men, and an office of the customs, near the mouth ofthe St. Louis, where all goods for the Fond du Lac departmentmust enter. This is at present the distributing point,where the company have an establishment, and where thegoods, on being received from Kamanitiquia, are embarkedfor their different destinations. That point also commandsthe communication with Lake de Sable, Leech Lake, RedLake, etc. I am also of opinion that the goods for RedRiver, if it be within our boundary, would enter here, inpreference to being exposed to seizure. It is worthy ofremark that the charter of the Hudson’s Bay Companyextends to all its waters: and if the British government conceivedthey had authority to make such a grant, they certainlywould claim the country therein specified, whichwould extend far south of the west line from the head of theLake of the Woods.

The North West Company were about to push their tradedown the Mississippi until they would have met the tradersof Michilimackinac; but I gave them to understand thatit could not be admitted, as appears per letter to Mr.Dickson.

A. Description of the N. W. Company’s Fort at Sandy Lake.

The fort at Sandy Lake is situated on the S. side, nearthe W. end, and is a stockade 100 feet square, with bastionsat the S. E. and N. W. angles, pierced for small-arms. Thepickets are squared on the outside, round within, about onefoot diameter, and 13 feet above ground. There are threegates: the principal one fronts the lake on the N., and is10 — — 9 feet; the one on the W. 6 — — 4 feet; and the one on theE. 6 — — 5 feet. As you enter by the main gate you have onthe left a building of one story, 20 feet square, the residenceof the superintendent. Opposite this house on the left ofthe E. gate, is a house 25 — — 15 feet, the quarters of the men.On entering the W. gate you find the storehouse on theright, 30 — — 20 feet, and on your left a building 40 — — 20 feet,which contains rooms for clerks, a workshop, and provisionstore.

On the W. and N. W. is a picketed inclosure of about fouracres, in which last year they raised 400 bushels of Irishpotatoes, cultivating no other vegetables. In this inclosureis a very ingeniously constructed vault to contain the potatoes,and which likewise has secret apartments to concealliquors, dry goods, etc.

B. Description of the N. W. Company’s Fort at Leech Lake.

The fort is situated on the W. side of the lake, in lat.47° 16´ 13´´ N. It is built near the shore, on the declivityof a rising ground, having an inclosed garden of about 5acres on the N. W. It is a square stockade of 150 feet, thepickets being 16 feet in length, 3 feet under and 13 feetabove the ground, bound together by horizontal bars each10 feet long. Pickets of 10 feet are likewise driven into theground on the inside of the work, opposite the aperturesbetween the large pickets. At the W. and E. angles aresquare bastions, pierced for fire-arms.

The main building in the rear, fronting the lake, is 60 — — 25feet, 1½ story high; the W. end of this is occupied by thedirector of the Fond du Lac department. He has a hall 18feet square, bed-room, and kitchen, with an office. Thecenter is a trading shop of 12½ feet square, with a bedroomin the rear, of the same dimensions. The E. end is alarge store 25 — — 20 feet, under which is an ice-house wellfilled. The loft extends over the whole building, and containsbales of goods, packs of peltries; also, chests with 500bushels of wild rice. Beside the ice-house, there are cellarsunder all the other parts of the building. The doors andwindow-shutters are musket-proof.

On the W. side is a range of buildings 54 — — 18 feet, frontingthe parade, the N. end of which is a cooper’s shop 18 — — 14feet, with a cellar; joining to which is a room called theIndian hall, expressly for the reception of Indians, and inwhich the chiefs who met me in council were entertained.In this hall are two closed bunks for interpreters; itsdimensions are 22 — — 18 feet. Adjoining this is a room 18feet square for the clerks, in which my small party werequartered. Under both of the latter rooms are cellars.

On the E. side is a range of buildings 50 — — 18 feet, whichhas one room of 20 feet and one of 15 feet, for quarters forthe men; also, a blacksmith’s shop of 15 feet, which isoccupied by an excellent workman. On the left of themain gate, fronting the river, is the flag-staff, 50 feet inheight.

They intended building a small blockhouse over the maingate, fronting the lake, to place a small piece of artillery in.There are likewise gates on the N. and E. flanks, of about10 — — 8 feet.

D. The price of goods in exchange with the Indians.

Blankets, 3 and 2½ point, each, [VI-5]plus 4 $8
Blankets, 2 point, each, 2 4
Blankets, 1½ point, each, 1 2
Blue strouds, per fathom, 4 8
Scarlet cloth, 8-6, 6 12
Worsted binding, per piece, 4 8
Vermilion, per pound, 4 8
Molten [glass beads], blue and white, per fathom, 2 4
Gunpowder, per half-pint, 1 2
Balls, per 30, 1 2
Shot of all sorts, per handful, 1 2
Tobacco, per carrot, 4 8
Twist tobacco, per fathom, 1 2
Beaver-traps, each, 4 8
Half-axes, each, 2 4
Castites, 1 2
N. W. guns, each, 10 20
Knives, each, 1 2

For wampum and silver works, as well as rum, there is no regulation; butthe real price of goods here, in exchange for peltry, is about 250 per cent. on theprime cost.

Geo. Anderson.

C. — Recapitulation of Furs and Peltries, North West Company, 1804-5,Fond du Lac Department; Marks and Numbers as per margin.

LEGEND

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X
N. W. L. L. [Leech Lake.] 1 92                 45                        
  2 92                 47                        
  3 93                 47                        
  4 91                 45                        
  5 90                 47                        
  6 91                 47                        
  7 92                 39                        
  8 87                 40                        
  9 92                 38                        
  10 91                 38                        
  11 92                 38                        
  12 87                 38                        
  13 90                 44                        
  14 92                 39                        
  15 93                 35                        
  16 93                 40                        
  17 99                 40                        
  18 88                 35                        
  19 96                 2                     655  
  20 95                 2                     607  
  21 90     68     90                              
  22 89     66     89                              
  23 92     64     92                              
  24 92     71     92                              
  25 92     68     92                              
  26 92     65     92                              
  27 91     73     91                              
  28 89     75     89                              
  29 90     75     90                              
  30 90     85     90                              
  31 91     61     91                              
  32 92     60     92                              
  33 91     67     91                              
  34 91     74     91                              
  35 91 5                                 60      
  36 99 4               2                 60      
  37 92 18                                        
  38 93 4               3   22 25           22      
  39 92 6                   11 4   2       16 1 94  
  40 87 6             1 2 1 11   5 21         27 144  
  41 92 6   29     20     7   1 1   5       16 10 58  
  42 93     66     93                              
  43 93     79     93                              
  44 90     70     93                              
  45 93 2           1   12   3   14 2 13     7 — 2 9  
  46 91       79     91                            
  47 90       89     90                            
  48 91       69     91                            
  49 91       73     91                            
  50 87 2             1 2   12 1 3 15 4     45      
  51 104 2   36           1   2 2   2 2     10 1 137  
  52 127 1   46               4   4 3 2     11 2 117  
N. W. R. [Red Lake.] 1 94       57 9 94                              
  2 91       51 14 91                              
  3 92       50 22 92                              
  4 92       49 19 92                              
  5 92       54 31 92                              
  6 92       59 6 62                              
  7 95 7 1   2               3     11       3    
  8 92       2                               672  
  9 92               1 1   15           1 67     1
  10 90       1         1     3     11            
  11 90 8 2   2           1 3 7 37 24 5         3  
  12 95       45 8           2             11 13    
  13 93 4 4                 11   7 19 9 1   1 3 58  
  14 93 2 2   13 9           7   1 1 11     6 4 6  
  15 92       3 6 14             2 1   2 8 1   1  
N. W. S. [Sandy Lake.] 1 86                 14 1 18   3 7       25 7    
  2 91                 6                     500  
  3 88       40 29 88                              
  4 91       37 32 91                              
  5 91       37 30 91                              
  6 90       31 37 90                              
  7 89       38 26 89                              
  8 92       41 33 92                              
  9 86       43 17 86                              
  10 87       32 40 87                              
  11 88       41 28 88                              
  12 90       44 22 90                              
  13 87       35 38 87                              
  14 92       43 23 92                              
  15 95                 5   22             63      
  16 92                 25   6 3 15 14         16    
  17 86                 32                        
  18 90                 31                        
  19 91                 29                        
  20 95                 33                        
  21 87 7 1   30   43     6                        
  22 83       38 33 83                              
  23 93       34 42 93                              
  24 87       34 43 87                              
  25 89       36 37 89                              
  26 92       57 14 92                              
  27 94 16 1                                      
  28 94 4               2   11             58      
  29 90                 2                     600  
  30 91                     5 1 43 22 1 11     10    
  31 93                 39                        
  32 93                 43                        
  33 90                 43                        
  34 91                 35                        
  35 99                 41                        
  36 86                 44                        
  37 72                 7         2 13 1   1   55  
  38 92 1     35 33       5           1     5      
F. L. [Fond du Lac.] Summr. Nos.   1     7   12         1     3   1   4   162  
                                               
  1 91       2   4                           615  
  2 93       51 14 93                              
  3 92       45 24 92                              
  4 93       44 25 93                              
  5 88       41 34 88                              
  6 95 5                       199 40 8            
  7 95 5                   16       6     35      
  8 95 4                           1         472  
  9 93 9 4             2 1   3     6     6 6 49  
  10 98   1   30 19       1           2   2        
  A. Pacton         11   15             2   2     3      

Amount of the above returns, 115 Packs.

Different establishments not included, 34 Packs.

Amount of the E. of the X. Y. Company, 84 Packs.

Total amount, 233 Packs.

E. Return of men employed in the N. W. Company’s Departmentof Fond du Lac, for 1805, with the amount of theirwages per annum, etc.

Accountants,   3
Clerks, and men receiving interpreters’ wages,   19
Interpreters,   2
Canoe-men,   85
Total,   109
Women and Children belonging to the Establishment.
Women,   29
Children,   50
Total,   79
Livres.
Sum of the wages per annum of the above 109 men, 63,913  
Average wages of each man, 586 7
Due by the N. W. Company, 38,566 8
Due to the N. W. Company, 24,326 16

N. B. The above women are all Indians, there not beinga single white woman N. W. of Lake Superior.

CHAPTER VII.

GEOGRAPHY OF THE MISSISSIPPI.[VII-1]

Observations on the Soil, Shores, Quarries, Timber, Islands,Rapids, Confluent Streams, Highlands, Prairies, and Settlementson the Mississippi,[VII-2] from St. Louis to its Source.

From St. Louis to the mouth of the Missouri, on the eastis a rich sandy soil, timbered with buttonwood, ash,cottonwood, hackberry, etc. The west side is highlands fora short distance above the town; then it is bordered by asmall prairie, after which is bottom-land, with the sametimber as on the east. The current is rapid, and the navigationin low water obstructed by sand-bars.

Immediately on the peninsula formed by the confluenceof the Mississippi and Missouri rivers is a small Kickapoosettlement, occupied in summer only. On the west shore isa rich prairie, with small skirts of woods; and on the eastshore is generally high hills, from 80 to 100 feet, extendingto the mouth of the Illinois. The current of the Mississippi,above the entrance of the Missouri, is quite mild until youarrive at the mouth of the Illinois; where, owing to thelarge sand-bars and many islands, it is extremely rapid.

The Illinois River is about 450 yards wide at its mouth,and bears from the Mississippi N. 75° W. The currentappears not to exceed 2½ miles per hour. The navigationand connecting streams of this river are too well known torequire a description at the present day. From the Illinoisto Buffalo river the E. shore is hills, but of easy ascent.On the W. is continued the prairie, but not always borderingon the river. The timber on both sides is generallyhackberry, cottonwood, and ash. Buffalo [Cuivre] rivercomes in on the W. shore, and appears to be about 100yards wide at its mouth; it bears from the Mississippi S. 30°W. From the Illinois to this river the navigation is by nomeans difficult, and the current mild.

Thence to Salt or Oahahah river, the east shore is eitherimmediately bounded by beautiful cedar cliffs, or the ridgesmay be seen at a distance. On the W. shore there is a richlow soil, and two small rivers which increase the waters ofthe Mississippi. The first [Buffalo creek] called Bar river,about 20 yards in width. The second [now Noir[VII-3] or Bearcreek] is about 15 yards. Salt river bears from the MississippiN. 75° W., and is about 100 or 120 yards wide at its entrance,and when I passed appeared to be perfectly mild,with scarcely any current. About one day’s sail up theriver there are salt springs, which have been worked for fouryears; but I am not informed as to their qualities or productions.In this distance the navigation of the Mississippiis very much obstructed by bars and islands; indeed to sucha degree as to render it in many places difficult to find theproper channel. The shores are generally a sandy soil, timberedwith sugar-maple, ash, pecan, locust, and black walnut.The E. side has generally the preference as to situationsfor buildings.

From this to the river Jaustioni [Jauflione, Jeffrion, orNorth Two Rivers: see note14, pp. 10, 11], which is ourboundary between the Sac nation and the United States onthe west side of the Mississippi, we have hills on the W.shore, and lowlands on the E., the latter of which is timberedwith hickory, oak, ash, maple, pecan, etc.; the formerthe same, with an increase of oak. The E. is a rich sandy soil,and has many very eligible situations for cultivation. Aboutseven miles below the Jaustioni a Frenchman is settledon the W. shore. He is married to a woman of the Sacnation, and lives by a little cultivation and the Indian trade.The [North] river before mentioned is about 30 yards wideat its mouth, and bears from the Mississippi about S. W.In this part of the river the navigation is good.

From this to the Wyaconda river [at La Grange, LewisCo., Mo.] the navigation is easy, with very few impediments;and the soil on both sides pretty good. This river pays itstribute to the Mississippi by a mouth 100 yards wide, andbears from the latter nearly due W. Just below its entranceis [Durgan’s creek] a small stream 15 yards wide, which dischargesinto the Mississippi. Between this river and theRiver de Moyen [Des Moines] there is one small [Fox]river emptying into the Mississippi on the W., about 55yards in width, and bearing S. by W. The first part of thedistance is obstructed by islands, and the river expands to agreat width, so as to render the navigation extremely difficult;but the latter part affords more water and is lessdifficult. The timber is principally oak and pecan; the soilas on the river below. For a description of de Moyen,see the chart herewith; and for that of the rapids [nearKeokuk] see my diary of Aug. 20th.

Above the rapid de Moyen, on the W. bank of the Mississippi[at Montrose, Lee Co., Ia.], is situated the first Sacvillage, consisting of 13 lodges; and immediately oppositeis the establishment of Mr. Ewing,[VII-4] the American agent atthat place. Whence to a large prairie on the E. side, onwhich [and on Henderson river] is situated the second Sacvillage; the E. side of the river is beautiful land, principallyprairie. The W. is in some part highland; both sides aretimbered with oak, ash, etc. The navigation is by no meansdifficult.

Thence to the Iowa river the navigation is much obstructedwith islands. In ascending Iowa river 36 milesyou come to a fork, the right branch of which is called RedCedar river, from the quantity of that wood on its banks;this is navigable for batteaux nearly 300 miles, where itbranches out into three forks, called the Turkey’s foot.Those forks shortly after lose themselves in Rice lakes.

The Iowa river bears from the Mississippi S. W. and is150 yards wide at its mouth. The E. shore of the Mississippiis high prairie, with yellow clay banks, and in someplaces red sand. On the W. is prairie also, but bounded onthe shore by skirts of woods. About 10 miles up the Iowariver, on its right bank, is a village of the Iowas.

From this place to Rock river we generally had beautifulprairies on the W., but in some places very rich land, withblack walnut and hickory timber. Stony [Rock] river isa large river which takes its source near Green bay ofLake Michigan more than 450 miles from its mouth, and isnavigable upward of 300 miles; it empties into the Mississippion the E. shore, and is about 300 yards wide at itsmouth. It bears from the Mississippi almost due E.About three miles up this river, on the S. bank [Milan,Rock Island Co., Ill.], is situated the third town of the Sacnation, which, I was informed by Mr. James Aird, wasburned in the year 1781 or 1782, by about 300 Americans,although the Indians had assembled 700 warriors to givethem battle. For a description of the rapids of Stonyriver, see my diary of Aug. 28th.

Between Iowa river and Turkey river, on the W., youfind Wabisipinekan river. It coasts along Red Cedar riverin a parallel direction, with scarcely any wood on its banks.The next water is the Great Macoketh, and 20 leagues higheris the little river of the same name. These two riversappear to approach each other, and have nothing remarkableexcepting lead mines, which are said to be in their banks.

A little above the rapids of Rock river, on the W. side ofthe Mississippi, is situated the first Reynard village; it consistsof about 18 lodges [Le Claire, Scott Co., Ia.]. Fromthis place to the lead mines [Dubuque, Ia.] the Mississippievidently becomes narrower; but the navigation is therebyrendered much less difficult. The shores are generallyprairie, which, if not immediately bordering on the river,can be seen through the skirts of forests which border theriver. The timber is generally maple, birch, and oak, andthe soil very excellent. To this place we had seen onlya few turkeys and deer, the latter of which are prettynumerous from the river de Moyen up. For a descriptionof the lead mines, see my report from the prairie des Chiensof Sept. 5th.[VII-5]

From the lead mines unto Turkey river the Mississippicontinues about the same width; and the banks, soil, andproductions are entirely similar. Turkey river empties onthe W., bears from the Mississippi about S. W., and is about 100 yards wide at its mouth. Half a league up thisriver, on the right bank, is the third village of the Reynards,at which place they raise sufficient corn to supply all thepermanent and transient inhabitants of the Prairie desChiens. Thence to the Ouiscousing the high hills are perceptibleon both sides, but on the W. almost border theriver the whole distance. The Ouiscousing at its entranceis nearly half a mile wide, and bears from the Mississippinearly N. E.

This river is the grand source of communication betweenthe lakes and the Mississippi, and the route by which all thetraders of Michilimackinac convey their goods for the tradeof the Mississippi from St. Louis to the river de Corbeau,and the confluent streams which are in those boundaries.

The voyage from Michilimackinac to the Prairie desChiens, by the Ouiscousing and Fox rivers, is as follows:[VII-6]

"The distance between Michilimackinac and the settlementat the bottom of Green bay is calculated to be 80leagues. On leaving Michilimackinac there is a traverse offive miles to Point St. Ignace [in Mackinac Co., Mich.], whichis the entrance into Lake Michigan. Four leagues fromMichilimackinac is an island of considerable extent, namedSt. Helens [or Helena], which may be seen from that placeon a clear day. The shore [of Lake Michigan] from Michilimackinacto Point du Chene [Pointe au Chêne, Oak Point],which is a league distant from the island, is rocky; and fromthis point to the island of Epouvette, which is a very smallone near the banks of the lake, is high and covered withpine; the soil is very barren. From this island to the riverMino Cockien [Milakokia] is five leagues. Two smallislands are on the way, and a river where boats and canoesmay take shelter from a storm. The river Mino Cockien islarge and deep, and takes its rise near Lake Superior.From this to Shouchoir [Pointe Seul Choix, in SchoolcraftCo., Mich.] is ten leagues. The shore [along by PointsPatterson, Scott, and Hughes] is dangerous, from thenumber of shoals that extend a great way into the lake.This rock [or point], called Shouchoir, is an excellentharbor for canoes, but its entrance, when the wind blowsfrom the lake, is difficult; but when once in, canoes andboats may lie during any storm without unlading. A customprevails here among the voyagers for everyone tohave his name carved on the rocks the first time he passes,and pay something to the canoe-men. From this to theriver Manistique [Monistique, at Epsport, Schoolcraft Co.,Mich.] is five leagues. This is a large river; the entranceis difficult, from a sand-bank at its mouth, and the wavesare very high when the wind blows from the lake. At certainseasons sturgeon are found here in great numbers. Thebanks of this river are high and sandy, covered with pine.It takes its rise [in part] from a large lake [of the samename], and nearly communicates with Lake Superior.From this to the Detour [Pointe de Tour (Turning Point),end of the peninsula in Delta Co., between Baie de Nocand Lake Michigan] is 10 leagues [passing Point Wiggins,Pointe au Barque, and Portage bay]. The shore is rocky,flat, and dangerous. Here begins the Traverse, at themouth of Green bay. The first island is distant from themainland about a league, and is called the Isle au Detour[now Big Summer island]; it is at least three leagues incircumference. There are generally a few Sauteaux lodgesof Indians on this island during the summer months.From this to Isle Brule [Gravelly island] is three leagues.There are two small [Gull] islands from these to Isle Verte[St. Martin’s island], and it is two leagues to Isle de Pou[Washington island], called so from the Poutowatomieshaving once had a village here, now abandoned. In themonths of May and June there is a fishery of trout [Salmo(Cristivomer) namaycush], and they are taken in greatquantities by trolling. There are also whitefish [Coregonusclupeiformis] in vast numbers. The ship channel is betweenthis island and Isle Verte. Thence to Petit D’Etroit[Détroit] to the mainland is three leagues, where somelodges of Ottawas and Sauteaux raise small quantities ofcorn; but their subsistence, during the summer months,chiefly depends upon the quantities of sturgeon [Acipenserrubicundus] and other fish, with which the lake hereabounds. From Petit D’Etroit [the strait between Washingtonisland and the mainland of Door Co., Wis., in whichare Detroit, Plum, and Pilot islands] to the mainland isthree leagues, and is called the Port de Mort [Porte desMorts], from a number of Reynard canoes having beenwrecked at this place, where everyone perished. The shoreis bold and rocky [Hedgehog Harbor, Death’s Door Bluffs,Sister Bluffs, etc.]. From this it is four leagues to the IsleRacro [Horseshoe island, in Eagle bay], which is a safeharbor, inaccessible to all winds. From this to Sturgeonbay is eight leagues. The shore is bold and rocky [EagleBluff, Egg Harbor, etc.], and several large [Chambers,Green, and the small Strawberry, and Hat] islands lie a fewmiles distant. A few Sauteaux families raise corn here andreside during the summer season. Trout and sturgeon arehere in great numbers. Sturgeon’s bay is two miles acrossand about four leagues in length, and communicates by aportage [now a canal] with Lake Michigan, near Michilimackinac.Distant from the lake about two leagues is theIsle Vermillion [off Little Sturgeon bay]. Here were a fewyears ago a number of Fols Avoin inhabitants, who wereaccustomed to raise corn; but for what reasons they haveleft this place I cannot learn. From this is 13 leagues tothe entrance of Fox river. On leaving Isle Vermillion,the woods and general appearance of the country begin tochange, and have a very different aspect from the morenorthern parts of this lake [i. e., Green bay]. A small rivercalled Riviere Rouge [Red river, and town of same name,in Kewaunee Co.] falls into the lake [Green bay], abouthalfway between Isle Vermillion and La Baye [La Baie;[VII-7]location of Green Bay, seat of Brown Co.]. On approachingLa Baye, the water of the latter [lake, i. e., Green bay]assumes a whiter appearance, and becomes less deep. Achannel which winds a good deal may be found for vesselsof 50 and 60 tons burden; loaded vessels of these dimensionshave gone up Fox river to the French settlement [ofLa Baie, site of Depere], opposite which is the Fols Avoinvillage [present site of Nicollet], which consists of 10 or 12bark lodges. A great number of Sauteaux, and someOttawas, come here in the spring and fall. Three leaguesfrom La Baye [present Green Bay] is a small village [belowpresent Little Kaukauna] of the same nation; and there isanother three leagues higher, at the portage of Kakalin[Little Rapids[VII-8]]. This portage is a mile long; the groundeven and rocky. There is a fall of about ten feet, which obstructsthe navigation. For three leagues higher are almostcontinual rapids, until the fall of Grand Konimee [vicinityof present Kaukauna], about five feet high. Above this, theriver opens into a small lake, at the end of which is a strongrapid, called Puant’s rapid [now Winnebago rapids], whichissues from a lake of that name [i. e., Lake Winnebago, inWinnebago Co.[VII-9]]. This lake is 10 leagues long, and fromtwo to three wide. At its entrance [where are nowMenasha and Neenah, Winnebago Co.] is another Puantvillage, of about the same number of lodges, and at thisend is a small river, which, with the interval of a fewportages, communicates with Rock river [of Wisconsin andIllinois]. About midway between the two Puant villages isa Fols Avoin village, on the south [-east] side of the lake [inCalumet Co.], of 50 or 60 men. Five leagues from theentrance of the lake, on the north [-west] side, Fox riverfalls in [at Oshkosh, Winnebago Co.], and is about 200yards wide. Ascending two leagues higher, is a small FolsAvoin village, where is a lake [Lac Butte des Morts] morethan two leagues long; and about a league above this lakethe river de Loup [Wolf river, after flowing through Poyganlake] joins Fox river near a hill [and town] called the Butde Mort [Butte des Morts], where the Fox nation werenearly exterminated by the French and Confederate Indians.The rivers and lakes are, at certain seasons, full of wild rice.The country on the borders of this [Fox] river is finelydiversified with woods and prairies. Any quantity of haymay be made, and it is as fine a country for raising stock asany in the same latitude through all America. From theBut de Mort to the Lac a Puckway[VII-10] is 28 leagues. Hereis another Puant village, of seven or eight large lodges.This lake is three leagues long; four leagues above it Lacde B — uf [Buffalo lake] begins, which is also four leagueslong; this is full of wild rice, and has a great many fowl intheir season. From Lac de B — uf to the forks [confluenceof the Necha river with Fox river], which is five leaguesfrom the portage of the Ouiscousing, and 10 leagues abovethe forks [ — — ], is a very small lake, called Lac Vaseux[Muddy lake], so choked with wild rice as to render italmost impassable. The [Fox] river, although very winding,becomes more and more serpentine on approaching theportage, and narrows so much as almost to prevent the use ofoars. The length of the portage to the Ouiscousing [river,at present town of Portage, Columbia Co.] is two miles;but when the waters are high, canoes and boats pass overloaded. Here the waters at that time separate, one partgoing to the Gulf of Mexico, and the other to that of St.Lawrence. In wet seasons the portage road is very bad,the soil being of a swampy nature. There is for nearly halfwaya kind of natural canal, which is sometimes used, andI think a canal between the two rivers might be easily cut[Wis. Cent., and C., M., and St. P. R. R. to Portage now].The expense at present attending the transport is one-thirdof a dollar per cwt.; for a canoe $5 and a boat $8; this isnot cash, but in goods at the rate of 200 per cent. on thesterling. There are at present two white men who haveestablishments there; they are much incommoded by thePuants of Rock river, who are troublesome visitors. TheOuiscousing is a large river; its bottom sandy, full ofislands and sand-bars during the summer season. The navigationis difficult even for canoes, owing to the lowness ofthe water. From the portage to its confluence with theMississippi is 60 leagues [about 40 leagues — 112 miles].The Saques and Reynards formerly lived on its banks,but were driven off by the Sauteaux. They were accustomedto raise a great deal of corn and beans, the soilbeing excellent. Opposite the Detour de Pin, halfwayfrom the portage, on the south side, are lead mines, said tobe the best in any part of the country, and to be wroughtwith great ease. Boats of more than four tons are improperfor the communication between the Mississippi andMichilimackinac." ([Colonel Robert] Dickson.)

The present village of Prairie des Chiens was first settledin the year 1783, and the first settlers were Mr. Giard, Mr.Antaya, and Mr. Dubuque. The old village is about amile below the present one, and existed during the timethe French were possessed of the country. It derives itsname from a family of Reynards who formerly lived there,distinguished by the appellation of Dogs. The presentvillage was settled under the English government, and theground was purchased from the Reynard Indians. It issituated about one league above the mouth of the Ouiscousingriver. On the E. bank of the river there is a smallpond or marsh which runs parallel to the river in the rear ofthe town, which, in front of the marsh, consists of 18 dwelling-houses,in two streets; 16 in Front Street and two inFirst Street. In the rear of the pond are eight dwelling-houses;part of the houses are framed, and in place ofweatherboarding there are small logs let into mortises madein the uprights, joined close, daubed on the outside withclay, and handsomely whitewashed within. The insidefurniture of their houses is decent and, indeed, in those ofthe most wealthy displays a degree of elegance and taste.

There are eight houses scattered round the country, atthe distance of one, two, three, and five miles: also, on theW. side of the Mississippi [now Bloody Run, on which isN. McGregor, Clayton Co., Ia.] three houses, situated on asmall stream called Giards [or Giard’s] river, making, in thevillage and vicinity, 37 houses, which it will not be toomuch to calculate at 10 persons each. The populationwould thus be 370 souls; but this calculation will not answerfor the spring or autumn, as there are then, at least, 500 or600 white persons. This is owing to the concourse of tradersand their engagees from Michilimackinac and other parts,who make this their last stage previous to launching intothe savage wilderness. They again meet here in the spring,on their return from their wintering-grounds, accompanied by300 or 400 Indians, when they hold a fair; the one disposesof remnants of goods, and the others reserved peltries. It isastonishing that there are not more murders and affrays atthis place, where meets such an heterogeneous mass to trade,the use of spirituous liquors being in no manner restricted;but since the American has become known, such accidentsare much less frequent than formerly. The prairie on whichthe village is situated is bounded in the rear by high baldhills. It is from one mile to three-quarters of a mile fromthe river, and extends about eight miles from the Mississippi,to where it strikes the Ouiscousing at the Petit Grey,which bears from the village S. E. by E.

If the marsh before spoken of were drained, which mightbe easily done, I am of the opinion it would render healthythe situation of the prairie, which now subjects its inhabitantsto intermitting fevers in the spring and autumn.

There are a few gentlemen residing at the Prairie desChiens, and many others claiming that appellation; but therivalship of the Indian trade occasions them to be guilty ofacts at their wintering-grounds which they would blush tobe thought guilty of in the civilized world. They possessthe spirit of generosity and hospitality in an eminent degree,but this is the leading feature in the character of frontierinhabitants. Their mode of living has obliged them to havetransient connection with the Indian women; and what wasat first policy is now so confirmed by habit and inclinationthat it is become the ruling practice of the traders, withfew exceptions; in fact, almost one-half the inhabitantsunder 20 years have the blood of the aborigines in theirveins.

From this village to Lake Pepin we have, on the W. shore[Iowa and Minnesota], first Yellow river [present name; atits mouth Council Hill, Allamakee Co., Ia.], of about 20yards wide, bearing from the Mississippi nearly due W.;second, the [Upper] Iowa river, about 100 yards wide, bearingfrom the Mississippi about N. W.; third, the Racine[Root] river, about 20 yards wide, bearing from the Mississippinearly W., and navigable for canoes 60 miles; fourth,the rivers Embarra [Embarras, or Zumbro] and Lean Claire[l’Eau Claire, now White Water or Minneiska], which jointheir waters just as they form a confluence with the Mississippi,are about 60 yards wide, and bear nearly S. W.

On the E. shore [Wisconsin], in the same distance, is the river de la Prairie la Cross [La Crosse river], which emptiesinto the Mississippi at the head of the prairie of that name.It is about 20 yards wide, and bears N. N. W. We thenmeet with the Black [present name] river, a very considerablestream about 200 yards wide at its mouth, on which thetraders frequently winter with the Puants and Fols Avoins.Next we pass the river of the Montaigne qui Trompes dansl’Eau [Rivière de la Montagne qui Trempe à l’Eau, nowTrempealeau river], a small stream in the rear of the hill ofthat name. Then we find the Riviere au B — uf [Buffalo river],about 30 yards wide, bearing N. by W. At the entrance ofLake Pepin, on the E. shore, joins the Sauteaux [Chippewa]river, which is at least half a mile wide, and appears to be adeep and majestic stream. It bears from the Mississippinearly due N. This river is in size and course, for somedistance up, scarcely to be distinguished from the Ouiscousing;it has a communication with Montreal river by ashort portage, and by this river with Lake Superior.[VII-11] Theagents of the N. W. Company supply the Fols Avoin Sauteauxwho reside at the head of this river; and those ofMichilimackinac, the Sioux who hunt on its lower waters.

In this division of the Mississippi the shores are morethan three-fourths prairie on both sides, or, more properlyspeaking, bald hills which, instead of running parallel withthe river, form a continual succession of high perpendicularcliffs and low valleys; they appear to head on the river, andto traverse the country in an angular direction. Thosehills and valleys give rise to some of the most sublime andromantic views I ever saw. But this irregular scenery issometimes interrupted by a wide extended plain whichbrings to mind the verdant lawn of civilized life, and wouldalmost induce the traveler to imagine himself in the centerof a highly cultivated plantation. The timber of this divisionis generally birch, elm, and Cottonwood; all the cliffsbeing bordered by cedar.

The navigation unto [Upper] Iowa river is good, butthence to the Sauteaux river is very much obstructed byislands; in some places the Mississippi is uncommonly wide,and divided into many small channels which from the cliffsappear like so many distinct rivers, winding in a parallelcourse through the same immense valley. But there arefew sand-bars in those narrow channels; the soil being rich,the water cuts through it with facility.

La Montaigne qui Trompe dans l’Eau stands in the Mississippinear the E. shore, about 50 miles below the Sauteauxriver, and is about two miles in circumference, with an elevationof 200 feet, covered with timber. There is a small[Trempealeau: see note56, pp. 52-54] river which emptiesinto the Mississippi in the rear of the mountain, which Iconceive once bounded the mountain on the lower side, andthe Mississippi on the upper, when the mountain wasjoined to the main by a neck of low prairie ground, whichin time was worn away by the spring freshets of theMississippi, and thus formed an island of this celebratedmountain.

Lake Pepin, so called by the French, appears to be onlyan expansion of the Mississippi. It commences at the entranceof the Sauteaux, and bears N. 55° W. 12 miles to Pointde Sable, which is a neck of land making out about onemile into the lake from the W. shore, and is the narrowestpart of the lake. From here to the upper end the course isnearly due W. about 10 miles, making its whole length 22miles, and from 4 to 1½ miles in width; the broadest partbeing in the bay below Point de Sable. This is a beautifulplace; the contrast of the Mississippi full of islands, and thelake with not one in its whole extent, gives more force tothe grandeur of the scene. The French, under the governmentof M. Frontenac, drove the Reynards or Ottaquamies[Outagamas, etc.] from the Ouiscousing, pursued them upthe Mississippi, and, as a barrier, built a stockade [FortBeauharnois — ] on Lake Pepin on the W. shore, just belowPoint de Sable. As was generally the case with that nation,they blended the military and mercantile professions, bymaking their fort a factory for the Sioux. The lake, at theupper end, is three fathoms deep; but this, I am informed,is its shoalest part. From [Upper] Iowa river to the headof Lake Pepin, elk are the prevailing species of wild game,with some deer, and a few bear.

From the head of Lake Pepin for about 12 miles, toCannon river, the Mississippi is branched out into manychannels, and its bosom covered with numerous islands.There is a hill on the W. shore [at Red Wing], about sixmiles above the lake, called the Grange [la Grange, the Barn],from the summit of which you have one of the most delightfulprospects in nature. When turning your face to the E.you have the river winding in three [South, Middle, andNorth] channels at your feet; on your right the extensivebosom of the lake, bounded by its chain of hills; in front,over the Mississippi, a wide extended prairie; on the leftthe valley of the Mississippi, open to view quite to the St.Croix; and partly in your rear, the valley through whichpasses Riviere au Canon. When I viewed it, on one of theislands below appeared the spotted lodges of Red Wing’sband of Sioux. The white tents of the traders and mysoldiers, and three flags of the United States waving on thewater, gave a contrast to the still and lifeless wildernessaround and increased the pleasure of the prospect.

From Cannon river to the St. Croix, the Mississippi evidentlybecomes narrower, and the navigation less obstructedby islands. St. Croix river joins the Mississippi on the E.,and bears from the latter almost due N. It is only 80 yardswide at its mouth, but 500 yards up commences [Lower]Lake St. Croix, which is from 1½ to 3 miles wide, and 36long. This river communicates with Lake Superior by theBurnt river, by a portage of half a mile only, and in its wholeextent has not one fall or rapid worthy of notice.[VII-12] This,with the mildness of its current, and its other advantages,render it by far the most preferable communication whichcan be had with the N. W. from this part of our territories.Its upper waters are inhabited by the Fols Avoins and Sauteaux,who are supplied by the agents of the North WestCompany; and its lower division, by the Sioux and theirtraders.

The Mississippi from Cannon river is bounded on the E.by high ridges, but the left is low ground. The timber isgenerally ash and maple, except the cedar of the cliffs.From the St. Croix to the St. Peters the Mississippi is collectedinto a narrow compass; I crossed it at one place with40 strokes of my oars,[VII-13] and the navigation is very good.The E. bank is generally bounded by the river ridges, butthe W. sometimes by timbered bottom or prairie. Thetimber is generally maple, sugar-tree, and ash. About 20miles below the entrance of the St. Peters, on the E. shore,at a place called the Grand Morais [Marais, Big Marsh, nowPig’s Eye marsh or lake], is situated Petit Corbeau’s villageof 11 log houses. For a description of the St. Peters seethe chart herewith.

From the St. Peters to the Falls of St. Anthony theriver is contracted between high hills, and is one continualrapid or fall, the bottom being covered with rocks which inlow water are some feet above the surface, leaving narrowchannels between them. The rapidity of the current islikewise much augmented by the numerous small, rockyislands which obstruct the navigation. The shores havemany large and beautiful springs issuing forth, which formsmall cascades as they tumble over the cliffs into the Mississippi.The timber is generally maple. This place we notedfor the great quantity of wild fowl.

As I ascended the Mississippi, the Falls of St. Anthonydid not strike me with that majestic appearance which I hadbeen taught to expect from the descriptions of former travelers.On an actual survey I find the portage to be 260poles; but when the river is not very low, boats ascendingmay be put in 31 poles below, at a large cedar tree; thiswould reduce it to 229 poles. The hill over which the portageis made is 69 feet in ascent, with an elevation at thepoint of debarkation of 45°. The fall of the water betweenthe place of debarkation and reloading is 58 feet; the perpendicularfall of the shoot is 16½ feet. The width of theriver above the shoot is 627 yards; below, 209. For theform of the shoot, see a rough draught herewith.[VII-14] In highwater the appearance is much more sublime, as the greatquantity of water then forms a spray, which in clear weatherreflects from some positions the colors of the rainbow, andwhen the sky is overcast covers the falls in gloom andchaotic majesty.

From the Falls of St. Anthony to Rum river, the Mississippiis almost one continual chain of rapids, with the eddiesformed by winding channels. Both sides are prairie, withscarcely any timber but small groves of scrub oak. Rumriver is about 50 yards wide at its mouth, and takes itssource in Le Mille Lac,[VII-15] which is but 35 miles S. of LowerRed Cedar Lake. The small Indian canoes ascend thisriver quite to the lake, which is considered as one of thebest fur hunting-grounds for some hundreds of miles, andhas been long a scene of rencounters between the hunting-partiesof the Sioux and Sauteaux. Last winter a numberof Fols Avoins and Sioux, and some Sauteaux wintered inthat quarter. From Rum river to Leaf river, called [not] byFather Hennipin and [but by] Carver the river St. Francis,[VII-16]and which was the extent of their travels, the prairies continuewith few interruptions. The timber is scrub-oak, withnow and then a lonely pine. Previous to your arrival atLeaf river, you pass Crow [Carver’s Goose] river on the W.,about 30 yards wide, which bears from the Mississippi S. W.Leaf river is only a small stream of not more than 15 yardsover, and bears N. by W.

The elk begin to be very plenty; there are also somebuffalo, quantities of deer, raccoons, and on the prairie afew of the animals called by the French brelaws [blaireaux,badgers].

Thence to Sac [or Sauk] river, a little above the GrandRapids [Sauk Rapids, St. Cloud, etc.], both sides of the riverare generally prairie, with skirts of scrub-oak. The navigationis still obstructed with ripples, but with some intermissionsof a few miles.

At the Grand Rapids the river expands to about ¾ of amile in width, its general width not being more than — of amile, and tumbles over an unequal bed of rocks for abouttwo miles, through which there cannot be said to be anychannel; for, notwithstanding the rapidity of the current,one of my invalids who was on the W. shore waded to theE., where we were encamped. The E. bank of these rapidsis a very high prairie; the W. scrubby wood-land. The Sacriver is a considerable stream, which comes in on the W.and bears about S. W., and is 200 yards wide at its mouth.

The quantity of game increases from Sac river to Pinecreek [now Swan river], the place where I built my stockadeand left part of my party; the borders are prairie, withgroves of pine on the edge of the bank; but there are someexceptions, where you meet with small bottoms of oak, ash,maple, and lynn [linden, basswood or whitewood, Tiliaamericana — bois blanc of the voyageurs].

In this distance there is an intermission of rapids forabout 40 miles, when they commence again, and are fully asdifficult as ever. There are three small creeks[VII-17] emptyingon the W. scarcely worthy of notice, and on the E. are twosmall rivers called Lake and Clear Rivers; the former, quitea small one [now called Little Rock], bears N. W., and isabout 15 yards wide at its mouth; about three miles fromits entrance is a beautiful small [Little Rock] lake, aroundwhich resort immense herds of elk and buffalo. Clear river[now called Platte river] is a beautiful little stream of about80 yards in width, which heads in some swamps and smalllakes [Platte, Ogechie, etc.] on which the Sauteaux of LowerRed Cedar Lake and Sandy Lake frequently come to hunt.The soil of the prairies from above the falls is sandy, butwould raise small grain in abundance; the bottoms are rich,and fit for corn or hemp.

Pine creek [now Swan river] is a small stream whichcomes in on the W. shore, and bears nearly W. It is borderedby large groves of white and red pine.

From Pine creek to the Isle De Corbeau, or river of thatname [now called Crow Wing], two small rivers come in onthe W. shore. The first [now Pike creek] is of little consequence;but the second, called Elk [or as now Little Elk]river, is entitled to more consideration, from its communicationwith the river St. Peters. They first ascend it to asmall lake, cross this, then ascend a small stream [LongPrairie river, a branch of Crow Wing river] to a large [Osakis]lake; from which they make a portage of four miles W.and fall into the Sauteaux [or Chippewa[VII-18]] river, which theydescend into the river St. Peters. On the E. side is onesmall stream [Nokasippi river], which heads toward LowerRed Cedar Lake, and is bounded by hills.

The whole of this distance is remarkably difficult to navigate,being one continued succession of rapid shoals andfalls; but there is one [fall which] deserves to be more particularlynoticed, viz.: The place called by the French LeShute de la Roche Peinture [La Chute de la Roche Peinte,Rapids of the Painted Rock, now Little falls], which is certainlythe third obstacle in point of navigation which I metwith in my whole route. The shore, where there is not prairie,is a continued succession of pine ridges. The entranceof the river De Corbeau is partly hid by the island of thatname, and discharges its waters into the Mississippi aboveand below it; the lowest channel bearing from the MississippiN. 65° W., the upper due W. This, in my opinion, shouldbe termed the Forks of the Mississippi, it being nearly ofequal magnitude, and heading not far from the same source,although taking a much more direct course to their junction.It may be observed on the chart that, from St. Louis to thisplace, the course of the river has generally been N. to W.and that from here it bears N. E.

This river affords the best and most approved communication with the Red river; and the navigation is as follows:You ascend the river De Corbeau 180 miles, to theentrance of the river Des Feuilles [now Leaf river], whichcomes from the N. W. This you ascend 180 miles also;then make a portage of half a mile into Otter Tail Lake,[VII-19]which is a principal source of Red river. The other [LongPrairie] branch of the river De Corbeau bears S. W. and approximateswith the St. Peters. The whole of this river israpid, and by no means affording so much water as the Mississippi.Their confluence is in latitude 45° 49´ 50´´ N. Inthis division the elk, deer, and buffalo were probably ingreater quantities than in any other part of my whole voyage.

Thence to Pine river [present name: not to be confounded with Pike’s Pine creek, now Swan river] the Mississippicontinues to become narrower, and has but fewislands. In this distance I discovered but one rapid, whichthe force of the frost had not entirely covered with ice. Theshores in general presented a dreary prospect of high barrennobs, covered with dead and fallen pine timber. To thisthere were some exceptions of ridges of yellow and pitch-pine;also some small bottoms of lynn, elm, oak, and ash.The adjacent country is at least two-thirds covered withsmall lakes, some of which are three miles in circumference.This renders communication impossible in summer, exceptwith small bark canoes.

In this distance we first met with a species of pine [fir]called the sap pine [French sapin, balsam-fir, Abies balsamea].It was equally unknown to myself and all myparty. It scarcely ever exceeds the height of 35 feet, and isvery full of projecting branches. The leaves are similar toother pines, but project out from the branches on each sidein a direct line, thereby rendering the branch flat. Thisformation occasions the natives and voyagers to give it thepreference on all occasions to the branches of all other treesfor their beds, and to cover their temporary camps; but itsgreatest virtue arises from its medicinal qualities. The rindis smooth, with the exception of little protuberances ofabout the size of a hazel-nut; the top of which being cut,you squeeze out a glutinous substance of the consistence ofhoney. This gum or sap gives name to the tree, and is usedby the natives and traders of that country as a balsam forall wounds made by sharp instruments, or for parts frozen,and almost all other external injuries which they receive.My poor fellows experienced its beneficial qualities by theapplication made of it to their frozen extremities in variousinstances.

Pine river bears from the Mississippi N. 30° E., althoughit empties on that which has been hitherto termed theW. shore. It is 80 yards wide at its mouth, and has anisland immediately at the entrance. It communicates withLake Le Sang Sue [Leech lake] by the following course ofnavigation: In one day’s sail from the confluence, youarrive at the first part of White Fish Lake [present name],which is about six miles long and two wide. Thence youpursue the river about two miles, and come to the secondWhite Fish Lake, which is about three miles long and onewide; then you have the river three miles to the third lake,which is seven miles long and two in width. This I crossedon my return from the head of the Mississippi on the [20th]of February; it is in 46° 32´ 32´´ N. lat. Thence you followthe river a quarter of a mile to the fourth lake, which is a circularone of about five miles in circumference. Thence youpursue the river one day’s sail to a small lake; thence twodays’ sail to a portage, which conveys you to another lake;whence, by small portages from lake to lake, you make thevoyage to Leech Lake. The whole of this course liesthrough ridges of pines or swamps of pinenet [épinette[VII-20]],sap pine, hemlock, etc. From the river De Corbeau to thisplace the deer are very plenty, but we found no buffaloor elk.

From this spot to [Lower] Red Cedar Lake, the pineridges are interrupted by large bottoms of elm, ash, oak, andmaple, the soil of which would be very proper for cultivation.From the appearance of the ice, which was firm andequal, I conceive there can be but one ripple in this distance.[Lower] Red Cedar lake lies on the E. side of theMississippi, at the distance of six miles from it, and is nearequally distant from the river De Corbeau and Lake DeSable [Sandy lake]. Its form is an oblong square, andmay be 10 miles in circumference. From this to Lake DeSable, on the E. shore, you meet with Muddy [now Rice]river, which discharges itself into the Mississippi by amouth 20 yards wide, and bears nearly N. E. We thenmeet with Pike [now Willow: see note49, p. 127] river, onthe W., about 77 [air-line about 15] miles below Sandy lake,bearing nearly due N.; up which you ascend with canoesfour days’ sail, and arrive at a Wild Rice lake, which youpass through and enter a small stream, and ascend it twoleagues; then cross a portage of two acres into a [Big Rice]lake seven leagues in circumference; then two leagues of a[Kwiwisens or Little Boy] river into another small lake.Thence you descend the current N. E. into Leech lake.The banks of the Mississippi are still bordered by pines ofdifferent species, except a few small bottoms of elm, lynn,and maple. The game is scarce, and the aborigines subsistalmost entirely on the beaver, with a few moose, andwild rice or oats.

Sandy Lake River, the discharge of said lake, is large, butonly six [about two] miles in length from the lake to itsconfluence with the Mississippi. Lake De Sable is about25 miles in circumference, and has a number of small riversrunning into it. One of those is entitled to particularattention: the Savanna, which by a portage of 3¾ milescommunicates with the river [Fond Du Lac or] St. Louis,which empties into Lake Superior at Fond Du Lac, and isthe channel by which the N. W. Company bring all theirgoods for the trade of the Upper Mississippi. Game isvery scarce in this country.

In ascending the Mississippi from Sandy Lake, you firstmeet with the Swan river [still so called: not to be confoundedwith the other of the same present name] on theeast, which bears nearly due E., and is navigable for barkcanoes for 90 miles to Swan Lake. You then meet withthe Meadow [or Prairie] River, which falls in on the E.,bears nearly E. by N., and is navigable for Indian canoes100 miles. You then in ascending meet with a very strongripple [Grand rapids], and an expansion of the river whereit forms a small lake. This is three miles below the Fallsof Packegamau [Pokegama], and from which the noise ofthat shoot might be heard. The course of the river is N.70° W.; just below, the river is a quarter of a mile in width,but above the shoot not more than 20 yards. The waterthus collected runs down a flat rock, which has an elevationof about 30 degrees. Immediately above the fall is a smallisland of about 50 yards in circumference, covered with sappine. The portage, which is on the E. (or N.) side, is nomore than 200 yards, and by no means difficult. Thosefalls, in point of consideration as an impediment to thenavigation, stand next to the Falls of St. Anthony, fromthe source of the river to the Gulf of Mexico. The banksof the river to Meadow river have generally either beentimbered by pine, pinenett [épinette], hemlock, sap pine[sapin or balsam-fir], or aspen tree. Thence it windsthrough high grass meadows or savannas, with pine swampsappearing at a distance to cast a deeper gloom on theborders. From the falls in ascending, you pass Lake Packegamauon the W., celebrated for its great production ofwild rice; and next meet with Deer river [present name]on the E., the extent of its navigation unknown. Younext meet with the Riviere Le Crosse[VII-21] [Rivière à la Crosse]on the E. side, which bears nearly N., and has only a portageof one mile to pass from it into the Lake WinipequeBranch of the Mississippi [through Little Lake Winnibigoshish].

We next come to what the people of that quarter callthe forks of the Mississippi, the right fork of which bearsN. W., and runs eight leagues to Lake Winipeque [Winnibigoshish[VII-22]],which is of an oval form, and about 36 miles incircumference. From Lake Winipeque the river continuesfive leagues to Upper Red Cedar [now Cass] Lake, whichmay be termed the Upper Source of the Mississippi. The[other fork or] Leech Lake Branch bears from the forks S.W., and runs through a chain of meadows. You pass Muddy[or Mud] lake, which is scarcely anything more than an extensivemarsh of 15 miles in circumference; the river bearsthrough it nearly N., after which it again turns W. Inmany places this branch is not more than 10 or 15 yardsin width, although 15 or 20 feet deep. From this to LeechLake the communication [through Leech Lake river] isdirect and without any impediment. This is rather consideredas the main source, although the Winipeque Branch isnavigable the greatest distance.

To this place the whole face of the country has an appearanceof an impenetrable morass or boundless savanna. Buton the borders of the lake is some oak, with large groves ofsugar-maple, from which the traders make sufficient sugarfor their consumption the whole year. Leech Lake communicateswith the river De Corbeau by seven portages,and with the river Des Feuilles; also, with the Red river,by the Otter Tail Lake on the one side, and by [Upper] RedCedar Lake and other small lakes to Red Lake on the other.Out of these small lakes and ridges rise the upper watersof the St. Lawrence, Mississippi,[VII-23] and Red river, the latterof which discharges itself into the ocean by Lake Winipie,Nelson’s River, and Hudson’s Bay. All those waters havetheir upper sources within 100 miles of each other, which Ithink plainly proves this to be the most elevated part of theN. E. continent of America. But we must cross what iscommonly termed the Rocky Mountains, or a Spur of theCordeliers [Cordilleras], previous to our finding the waterswhose currents run westward and pay tribute to the westernocean.

In this quarter we find moose, a very few deer andbear, but a vast variety of fur animals of all descriptions.

CHAPTER VIII.

ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE MISSISSIPPI.[VIII-1]

The first nation of Indians whom we met with in ascendingthe Mississippi from St. Louis were the Sauks,who principally reside in four villages. The first at thehead of the rapids De Moyen on the W. shore, consisting of13 log lodges; the second on a prairie on the E. shore,about 60 miles above; the third on the Riviere De Roche,about three miles from the entrance; and the fourth on theriver Iowa.

They hunt on the Mississippi and its confluent streams,from the Illinois to the river Des Iowa; and on the plainswest of them, which border the Missouri. They are so perfectlyconsolidated with the Reynards[VIII-2] that they scarcelycan be termed a distinct nation; but recently there appearsto be a schism between the two nations, the latter not approvingof the insolence and ill-will which has marked theconduct of the former toward the United States on manylate occurrences. They have for many years past, underthe auspices of the Sioux, made war on the Sauteaux,Osages, and Missouries; but as recently a peace has beenmade between them and the nations of the Missouri throughthe influence of the United States, and by the same meansbetween the Sioux and Sauteaux, their principal allies, it appearsthat it would by no means be a difficult matter toinduce them to make a general peace, and pay still greaterattention to the cultivation of the earth; as they now raisea considerable quantity of corn, beans, and melons. Thecharacter that they bear with their savage brethren is thatthey are much more to be dreaded for their deceit andinclination for stratagem than for their open courage.

The Reynards reside in three villages. The first is on theW. side of the Mississippi, six miles above the rapids of theRiver De Roche; the second is about 12 miles in the rear ofthe lead mines; and the third is on Turkey river, half aleague from its entrance. They are engaged in the samewars and have the same alliances as the Sauks, with whomthey must be considered as indissoluble in war or peace.They hunt on both sides of the Mississippi from the Iowa,below Prairie Des Chiens to a river of that name [UpperIowa], above said village. They raise a great quantity ofcorn, beans, and melons; the former of those articles in suchquantities as to sell many hundred bushels per annum.

The Iowas reside on the De Moyen and Iowa rivers in twovillages. They hunt on the W. side of the Mississippi, theDe Moyen, and westward to the Missouri; their wars andalliances are the same as those of the Sauks and Reynards,under whose special protection they conceive themselves tobe. They cultivate some corn, but not so much in proportionas the Sauks and Reynards. Their residence being onthe small streams in the rear of the Mississippi, out of thehighroad of commerce, renders them less civilized thanthose nations.

The Sauks, Reynards, and Iowas, since the treaty of thetwo former with the United States [in 1804], claim theland from the entrance of the Jauflioni [see note14, p. 11],on the W. side of the Mississippi, up the latter river to theDes Iowa, above Prairie Des Chiens, and westward to theMissouri; but the limits between themselves are undefined.All the land formerly claimed by those nations E. of theMississippi is now ceded to the United States; but theyhave reserved to themselves the privilege of hunting andresiding on it, as usual.

By killing the celebrated Sauk chief Pontiac, the Illinois,Cahokias, Kaskaskias, and Piorias kindled a war with theallied nations of Sauks and Reynards, which has been thecause of the almost entire destruction of the former nations.

The Winebagos or Puants are a nation who reside on therivers Ouiscousing, De Roche, Fox, and Green Bay, in sevenvillages, which are situated as follows: 1st, at the entranceof Green Bay; 2d, at the end of Green Bay; 3d, at Wuckan[Lake Poygan], on Fox river; 4th, at Lake Puckway; 5th,at the portage of the Ouiscousing; 6th and 7th, on Rocheriver.

Those villages are so situated that the Winebagos canembody the whole force of their nation, at any one point oftheir territory, in four days. They hunt on the Ouiscousingand Rock rivers, and E. side of the Mississippi, from Rockriver to Prairie Des Chiens; on Lake Michigan, Black river,and in the country between Lakes Michigan, Huron, andSuperior. From the tradition amongst them, and theirspeaking the same language as the Otos of the RivierePlatte, I am confident in asserting that they are a nationwho have emigrated from Mexico to avoid the oppressionof the Spaniards; and the time may be fixed at about 1½centuries past, when they were taken under the protectionof the Sioux, to whom they still profess to owe faith, and atleast brotherly attention. They have formerly been at warwith the nations west of the Mississippi, but appear recentlyto have laid down the hatchet. They are reputed brave,but from every circumstance their neighbors distinguishtheir bravery as the ferocity of a tiger, rather than the deliberateresolution of a man; and recently their conduct hasbeen such as to authorize the remark made by a chief of aneighboring nation, that "a white man never should liedown to sleep without precaution in their villages."

The Menomene or Fols Avoins, as they are termed by theFrench, reside in seven villages, situated as follows: 1st, atthe Menomene river, 15 leagues from Green Bay, on the northside of the lake; 2d, at Green Bay; 3d, at Little Kakalin;4th, at portage of Kakalin; 5th, on Stinking Lake [Winnebago];6th, at the entrance of a small lake [Lac Butte desMorts] on Fox river; and 7th, behind the Bank of theDead [Butte des Morts]. Their hunting-grounds are similarto those of the Winebagos; only that, owing to thevery high estimation in which they are held both by Siouxand Chipeways, they are frequently permitted to hunt nearRaven river on the Mississippi, which may be termed thebattle-ground between those two great nations. The languagewhich they speak is singular, for no white man hasever yet been known to acquire it; but this may probablybe attributed to their understanding the Algonquin, in whichthey and the Winebagos transact all conferences with thewhites or other nations; and the facility with which thatlanguage is acquired is a further reason for its prevalence.

The Fols Avoins, although a small nation, are respectedby all their neighbors for their bravery and independentspirit, and esteemed by the whites as their friends and protectors.When in the country I heard their chief assert incouncil with the Sioux and Chipeways, that although theywere reduced to few in number, yet they could say, "wenever were slaves," as they had always preferred that theirwomen and children should die by their own hands, to theirbeing led into slavery by their enemies. The boundary oftheir territory is uncertain. The Sauks, Reynards, Puants,and Menomenes all reside, when not at their villages, inlodges in the form of an ellipsis; some are from 30 to 40 feetin length by 14 or 15 wide, and are sufficiently large toshelter 60 people from the storm, or for 20 to reside in.Their covering is rushes plaited into mats, and carefullytied to the poles. In the center are the fires, immediatelyover which is a small vacancy in the lodge, which in fairweather is sufficient to give vent to the smoke; but in badweather you must lie down on the ground to prevent beingconsiderably incommoded by it.

We next come to that powerful nation the Sioux, thedread of whom is extended over all the Savage nations, fromthe confluence of the Mississippi and Missouri to Ravenriver on the former, and to the Snake [Shoshone] Indianson the latter. But in those limits are many nations whomthey consider as allies, on a similar footing with the allies ofancient Rome, i. e., humble dependents. But the Chipewaynation is an exception, who have maintained a long contestwith them, owing to their country being intersected by numeroussmall lakes, water-courses, impenetrable morasses, andswamps; and have hitherto bid defiance to all the attacks oftheir neighbors. It is necessary to divide the Sioux nationinto the different bands, as distinguished amongst themselves,in order to have a correct idea of them.

Agreeably to this plan, I shall begin with the MinowaKantong [Mdewakantonwans] or Gens De Lac, who extendfrom Prairie Des Chiens to La Prairie du Francois [vicinityof Shakopee, Chaska, etc.], 35 miles up the St. Peters. Thisband is again subdivided into four divisions, under differentchiefs. The first of these most generally reside at their villageon the Upper Iowa river, above Prairie Des Chiens, andare commanded by Wabasha, a chief whose father was consideredas the first chief of all the Sioux nation. This subdivisionhunts on both sides of the Mississippi and its confluentstreams, from Prairie Des Chiens to the riviere duB — uf. The second subdivision resides near the head of LakePepin, and hunts from the riviere du B — uf to near the St.Croix. Their chief’s name is Tantangamani — a very celebratedwar-chief. The third subdivision resides between theriviere au Canon and the entrance of the St. Peters, headedby Chatewaconamani. Their principal hunting-ground is onthe St. Croix. They have a village [Kapoja] at a placecalled Grand Marais [Pig’s Eye lake], 15 miles below the entranceof the St. Peters. It is situated on the east bank ofthe Mississippi, and consists of 11 log huts. The fourthsubdivision is situated from the entrance of the St. Petersto the Prairie Des Francois; they are headed by a chiefcalled Chatamutah, but a young man, Wyaganage, hasrecently taken the lead in all the councils and affairs of stateof this sub-band. They have one village, nine miles up theSt. Peters, on the N. side. This band (Minowa Kantong)are reputed the bravest of all the Sioux, and have for yearsbeen opposed to the Fols Avoin Sauteurs, who are reputedthe bravest of all the numerous bands of Chipeways.

The second band of Sioux are the Washpetong [Waqpetonwan]or Gens Des Fieulles [Feuilles], who inhabit thecountry from the Prairie De Francois to near Roche Blanche,on the St. Peters. Their first chief is Wasonquianni. Theyhunt on the St. Peters, also on the Mississippi, up Rumriver, and sometimes follow the buffalo on the plains. Theirsubdivisions I am unacquainted with.

The third band are the Sussitongs [Sisitonwans or Sissetons];they extend from the Roche Blanche [White Rock]to Lac de Gross Roche [Big Stone or Inyantonka lake], onthe river St. Peters; they are divided into two subdivisions.The first, called the Cawrees [Kahras], are headed by thechief called Wuckiew Nutch or Tonnere Rouge [Red Thunder].The second, the Sussitongs proper, are headed byWacantoe or Esprit Blue [Blue Spirit]. These two sub-bandshunt eastward to the Mississippi, and up that riveras far as the Riviere De Corbeau.

The fourth great band are the Yanctongs [Ihanktonwansor Yanktons], who are dispersed from the Montaignes[Coteau] De la Prairie, which extends from St. Peters to theMissouri, to the De Moyen. They are divided into twogrand divisions, generally termed Yanctongs of the North,and Yanctongs of the South [Yanktonnais and Yanktons].The former are headed by a chief called Muckpeanutah orNuage Rouge [Red Cloud]; and those of the Prairie, by Petessung. This band are never stationary, but with the Titongs are the most erratic of all the Sioux, sometimes tobe found on the borders of the Lower Red River, sometimeson the Missouri, and on those immense plains whichare between the two rivers.

The fifth great band are the Titongs [Titonwans, commonlycalled Tetons], who are dispersed on both sides ofthe Missouri; on the north, principally from the river Chienne[Cheyenne] up; and on the south, from the Mahas[Omahas] to the Minetares, or Gross Ventres [Hidatsas].They may be divided into the Titongs of the North andSouth; but the immense plains over which they rove withthe Yanctongs renders it impossible to point out their placeof habitation.

Stopped Here - Strickland , Started Here - Smith

The sixth, last, and smallest band of the Sioux are the Washpecoute [Waqpekute or Wahkpakotoan], who reside generally on the lands west of the Mississippi, between that river and the Missouri. They hunt most generally on the head of the De Moyen. They appeared to me tobe the most stupid and inactive of all the Sioux.

The Minowa Kantongs are the only band of Sioux whouse canoes, and by far the most civilized, being the only ones who have ever built log huts, or cultivated any species of vegetables, and among those only a very small quantity of corn and beans; for, although I was with them in September or October, I never saw one kettle of either,they always using wild oats for bread. This production nature has furnished to all the most uncultivated nations of the N. W. continent, who may gather in autumn a sufficiency which, when added to the productions of the chase and the net, insures them a subsistence through all the seasons of the year. This band is entirely armed with firearms, but is not considered by the other bands as anything superior on that account, especially on the plains.

The Washpetong are a roving band; they leave the St.Peters in the month of April, and do not return from the plains until the middle of August. The Sussitongs of Roche Blanche have the character of being the most evil-disposed Indians on the St. Peters. They likewise follow the buffaloin the spring and summer months. The Sussitongs of Lacde Gross Roche [Big Stone Lake], under Tonnere Rouge, have the character of good hunters and brave warriors, which may principally be attributed to their chief, Tonnere Rouge, who at the present day is allowed by both white people and the savages of the different bands to be (after their own chiefs) the first man in the Sioux nation. The Yanctongs andTitongs are the most independent Indians in the world; they follow the buffalo as chance directs, clothing themselves with the skins, and making their lodges, bridles, and saddles of the same materials, the flesh of the animal furnishing their food. Possessing innumerable herds of horses, they are here this day, 500 miles off ten days hence, and find themselves equally at home in either place, moving witha rapidity scarcely to be imagined by the inhabitants of the civilized world.

The trade of the Minowa Kantongs, Washpetongs, Sussitongs, and part of the Yanctongs, is all derived from the traders of Michilimackinac; and the latter of those two bands supply the Yanctongs of the North and Titongs with the small quantities of iron works [hardware] which they require. Firearms are not in much estimation with them. The Washpecoute trade principally with the people of Prairie Des Chiens; but for a more particular explanation of this subject, please to refer to the table.[VIII-3]

Abstract of the Nations of Indians on the Mississippi and itsconfluent streams from St. Louis, Louisiana, to its source, includingRed Lake and Lower Red River.

Names. Warriors. Women. Children. Villages. Probable Souls. Lodges of Roving Bands. Fire Arms. Primitive Language. Traders or Bands with whom they traffic. Annual Consumption of Merchandise. Annual return of Peltry in packs. Species of Peltry.
English. Indian. French.
I. Sauks Sawkee Saque 700 750 1400 3 2850   700 Sauk Michilimackinac, St. Louis, people of Prairie des Chiens 15000 600 Deer, some bear, a few otter, beaver, racoon.
II. Foxes Ottagaumie Reynards 400 500 850 3 1750   400 Sauk, with a small difference in the idiom do. 8500 400 Deer, a few bear, with a small proportion more of furs.
III. Iowas Aiowais Ne Perce 300 400 700 2 1400   250 Missouries Michilimackinac 10000 300 Deer, bear, otter, beaver, mink, racoon, gray fox, muskrat.
IV. Winebagos Ochangras Puants 450 500 1000 7 1950   450 Missouries, or Zoto do. 9000 200 Same as the Fox’s.
V. Menomenes Menomene Fols Avoin 300 350 700 7 1350   300 Menomene do. 9000 250 Beaver, marten, gray fox, mink, muskrat, otter, deer, elk, &c.
    [Total of the above] 2150 2500 4650 22 9300   2100          
VI. Sues Narcotah Sioux                        
1. People of the Lakes Minowa Kantong Gens du Lac 305 600 1200 3 2105 125 305 Narcotah do. 13500 230 Deer, a few bear, some beaver, racoon, &c.
2. People of the Leaves Washpetong Gens des Feuilles 180 350 530   1060 70 160 do. do. 6000 115 Deer, a few buffalo-robes, some beaver, otter, mink, &c.
3. Sissitons Sussitongs Sussitongs 360 700 1100   2160 155 260 do. do. 12500 160 Deer, many buffalo-robes, furs from Raven river.
4. Yanktons Yanctong Yanctong 900 1600 2700   4300 270 350 do. do. 8000 130 Principally buffalo-robes.
5. Tetons Titong Titong 2000 3600 6000   11600 600 100 do. Yanktongs and some Sussitongs     Buffalo-robes.
6. People of the Leaves detached[*] Washpecoute[*] Gens des Feuilles tirees[*] 90 180 270   450 50 90 do. People of Prairies des Chiens and on head of de Moyen 2000 50 Deer, beaver, otter, bear &c.
    [Total Sioux] 3835 6433 11800 3 21675 1270 1270          
VII. Chipeways Ouchipawah Sauteurs                        
1. Leapers   Sauteurs proper                        
  Of Sandy Lake[+]   45 79 224   345 24   Algonquin N. W. Company[++]     Beaver, muskrats, otter, marten, black and silver fox &c.
  Of Leech Lake[+]   150 280 690   1120 65   do. do.     do.
  Of Red Lake[+]   150 260 610   1020 64   do. do.     do.
2. Of St. Croix and Chipeway r.     104 165 420   689 50   do. do.     do.
3. Of the other bands generally     1600 2400 4000   8000 400   do. N. W. Co. and others Uncertain   Unknown.
    Total Chippewas 2049 3184 5944   11177 630 2049          
    [Grand total] 8034 12114 22394 25 45152 1873 5414          

Names (English.) Best Positions for Trading-posts. With Whom at war. With whom at peace, or in alliance. Names of Chiefs or Principal Men. Remarks.
Indian. French. English.
I. Sauks Head of rapid de Moyen Chipeways Reynards, Puants, Sioux, Osage, Potowatomies, Fols Avoins, Ioways, all nations of the Missouri Washione      
Pockquinike Bras Casse Broken Arm  
II. Foxes Giard’s river, nearly opp. Prairie des Chiens, confluence of Miss. and Ouiscousing do. do. Olopier     First Chief
Pecit Petit Corbeau Little Raven  
Akaque Peau Blanche White Skin Killed the Osage on their way to St. Louis; now raising a war-party tostrike the Sauteaux
III. Iowas Rivers de Moyen and Iowa do. do.        
IV. Winebagos Portage de Cockalin (on Fox river) or at Grand Calumet Since the peace between Osages, Sauks and Reynards, Puants have tacitly ceased war on the former In alliance with Sauks, Reynards, Sioux, Fols Avoins, &c., at peace with all others New Okat     First chief; commissioned as such
Sansamani      
Chenoway’s Son     Commissioned
Karamone     do.
Du Quarre     do.
Macraragah     do.
V. Menomenes Portage des Perre, on Fox river None In alliance with Ottoway, Chipeway, Ochangras Tomaw Thomas Carron Thomas Carron First chief; received commission as such, and flag
Shawonoe      
Neckech      
VI. Sues       Wabasha La Feuille The Leaf Literally translated; first chief of the nation; received a commission and a flag
1. People of the Lakes Entrance St. Croix Recently, Chipeways; now at peace; at war with Assinniboins and some nations on the Missouri Sauks, Reynards, Ioways, Fols Avoins Talangamane Aile Rouge Red Wing do.
Chatewaconamani Petit Corbeau Little Raven Received commission and flag
Tahamie Orignal Leve Rising Moose Literally translated
Tatamane Nez Corbeau Raven Nose Literally Wind that Walks; commissioned
2. People of the Leaves Little Rapids, St. Peters do. do. Wasonquianni Araignee Jaune Yellow Spider First chief of the nation
Wukunsna Tonnerre qui Sonne Rolling Thunder Literally translated
Houho Otah Le Noyeau Stone of Fruit Received a commission and flag
3. Sissitons Lac de Gross Roche, St. Peters do. do. Wacanto Esprit Bleu Blue Spirit First chief of his band
Waminisabah Killieu Noir Black Eagle Literally translated
Itoye Gross Calumet Big Pipe  
Wuckiew Nutch Tonnerre Rouge Red Thunder Literal translation; first chief of all the Sioux
4. Yanktons       Petessung Vache Blanche White Buffalo Literally translated
Muckpeanutah Nuage Rouge Red Cloud Literally translated; first chief of the nation
Champanage      
5. Tetons   Various nations of the Missouri do. Chantaoeteka C — ur Mauvais Bad Heart Bois Brulle
Shenouskar Couverte Blanche White Blanket Okandanda
6. People of the Leaves detached Prairie des Chiens do. do. Wamaneopenutah C — ur du Killeur Rouge Heart of the Red Eagle  
Tantangashatah B — uf qui Joue Playing Buffalo Literal translation
Kachiwasigon Corbeau Francois French Raven do.
VII. Chipeways
1. Leapers
  Sandy Lake Recently, Sioux; now at peace; at war with Sauks, Foxes, Iowas Fols Avoins, all nations of Canada Catawabata De Breche Broken Teeth First chief of his band
  Leech Lake do. do. Eskibugeckoge Geuelle Platte Flat Mouth do.
Obigouitte Chef de la Terre Chief of the Land  
Oole La Brule The Burnt  
  Red Lake do. do. Wiscoup Le Sucre The Sweet do.
2. Of St. Croix and Chipeway r. South side of Lake Superior do. do.        
3. Of the other bands generally       Necktame Preinier [Premier] Head Chief Resides on Lac La Pluir river.

N. B. — Wyaganage, or Fils de Pinchow, a chief of Gens du Lac, and head of village at entrance of St. Peters, omitted; hasreceived flag and commission. [Z. M. P.]

[N. B. — Total of Sacs, Foxes, Iowas, Winnebagoes, and Menomonees, and GrandTotal, embodied from the "Recapitulation," which was on separate leaf (unpaged p. 66) of orig. ed. — E. C.]

[*] This is merely a band of vagabonds, formed by refugees from all other bands, which they left for some bad deed.

[+] From actual estimate.

[++] See my Reports on the trade of the N. W. Company.

The claims of limits of the Sioux nation are allowed byall their neighbors to commence at Prairie Des Chiens, andascend the Mississippi on both sides to the Riviere De Corbeau;up that river to its source; thence to the source of the St. Peters; thence to the Montaigne De La Prairie;thence to the Missouri; down that river to the Mahas, bearing thence N. E. to the source of the De Moyen; and thenceto the place of beginning. They also claim a large territory south of the Missouri, but how far it extends is uncertain.The country E. of the Mississippi, from Rum river to the Riviere De Corbeau, is likewise in dispute between them and the Chipeways, and has been the scene of many a sharp encounter for near 150 years past.

From my knowledge of the Sioux nation, I do not hesitateto pronounce them the most warlike and independentnation of Indians within the boundaries of the United States, their every passion being subservient to that of war; at the same time that their traders feel themselves perfectly secure of any combination being made against themselves, it is extremely necessary to be careful not to injure the honor or feelings of an individual, which is certainly the principal cause of the many broils which occur between them. But never was a trader known to suffer in the estimation of the nation by resenting any indignity offered him, even if it went to taking the life of the offender. Their guttural pronunciation, high cheek bones, their visages, and distinct manners, together with their own traditions, supported by the testimony of neighboring nations, puts it in my mind beyond the shadow of a doubt that they have emigrated from the N. W. point of America, to which they have come across the narrow streight which in that quarter divides the two continents, and are absolutely descendants of a Tartarean tribe.

The only personal knowledge which I have of the Chipewaynation is restricted to the tribes on the south side of Lake Superior, on the headwaters of the Chipeway and the St. Croix; and to those who reside at Sandy Lake, Leech Lake, Rainy Lake, Red Lake, and the heads of the rivers Rouge, Mississippi, and De Corbeau. They are divided, like the Sioux, into many bands, the names of only seven of which I am acquainted with.

[1st.] I shall begin with those who reside on the southside of Lake Superior, and on Lakes De Sable and SangSue, with the adjacent country. They are generally denominated by the traders by the name of Sauteuxs,but those of the headwaters of the Chipeway and St.Croix rivers are called Fols Avoin Sauteurs. I am unacquaintedwith the names of their chiefs. Those of Sandy Lake are headed by a chief called Catawabata, or De Breche [Brèche-dent]. They hunt on Mille Lacs, Red Lake, the east bank of the Mississippi from Rum river up to the Des Corbeau, and thence on both sides ofthe Mississippi to Pine river; on that river also, up the Mississippi to Lake De Sable, and about 100 miles above that lake. Those of Leech Lake hunt on its streams, Lake Winipie [Winnibigoshish], Upper Red Cedar Lake, OtterTail Lake, head of the De Corbeau, and the upper part of Lower Red river. Their chief is Le Gieulle [La Gueule]Platte, or Eskibugeckoge [Flat Mouth].

2d. The Crees reside on Red lake, and hunt in its vicinityand on Red river. Their first chief’s name is Wiscoup, orLe Sucre.

3d. The Nepesangs reside on Lake Nippising and Lake St. Joseph.

4th. The Algonquins reside on the Lake of the two Mountains, and are dispersed along the north sides of Lakes Ontario and Erie. From this tribe the language of the Chipeways derives its name, and the whole nation is frequently designated by that appellation.

5th. The Otoways [Ottawas] reside on the N. W. side of Lake Michigan and Lake Huron; and hunt between those lakes and Lake Superior.

6th. The Iroquois Chipeways are dispersed along the banks of all the Great Lakes, from Ontario to the Lake ofthe Woods.

7th. The Muscononges reside on the waters of Lower Redriver, near to Lake Winipie [Winnipeg], and are the furthest band of Chipeways.

The Chipeways were the great and almost natural enemiesof the Sioux, with whom they had been waging a war of extermination for near two centuries. On my arrival among them I succeeded in inducing both sides to agree to a peace, and no blood was shed from Sept., 1805, to Apr., 1806, whenI left the country. This object had frequently been in vain attempted by the British government, who often brought the chiefs of the two nations together at Michilimackinac, made them presents, etc. But the Sioux, still haughty and overbearing, spurned the proffered calumet, and returned torenew the scenes of slaughter and barbarity. It may then be demanded, how could a subaltern with 20 men, and no presents worthy of notice, effect that which the governors of Canada, with all the immense finances of the Indian department,had attempted in vain, although they frequently and urgently recommended it — I reply that it is true theBritish government requested, recommended, and made presents — but all this at a distance; and when the chiefs returned to their bands, their thirst for blood soon obliterated from their recollection the lectures of humanity which they had heard in the councils of Michilimackinac. Butwhen I appeared amongst them the United States had lately acquired jurisdiction over them, and the names of the Americans as warriors had frequently been sounded in their ears; when I spoke to them on the subject I commandedthem, in the name of their great father, to make peace; offered them the benefit of the mediation and guarantee of the United States; and spoke of the peace, not as a benefitto us, but a step taken to make themselves and their childrenhappy. This language, held up to both nations withthe assistance of the traders, was a happy coincidence ofcircumstances; and (may I not add — ) the assistance of the Almighty effected that which had long been attempted in vain. But I am perfectly convinced that, unless troops aresent up between those two nations, with an agent whose business it would be to watch the rising discontents and check the brooding spirit of revenge, the weapons of death will again be raised, and the echoes of savage barbarity will resound through the wilderness.[VIII-4]

The Chipeways are uncommonly attached to spirituous liquors; but may not this be owing to their traders, who find it much to their [own] interest to encourage their [theChipeways’] thirst after an article which enables them [thetraders] to obtain their [the Chipeways’] peltries at so low arate as scarcely to be denominated a consideration, and have reduced the people near the establishments to a degreeof degradation unparalleled —

The Algonquin language is one of the most copious andsonorous languages of all the savage dialects in North America; and is spoken and understood by the various nations, except the Sioux, from the Gulf of St. Lawrence toLake Winipie [Winnipeg].

This nation is much more mild and docile than the Sioux,and if we may judge from unprejudiced observers, morecool and deliberate in action. But the latter possess a much higher sense of the honor of their nation: the others planfor self-preservation. The Sioux attacks with impetuosity; the other defends with every necessary precaution. But the superior numbers of the Sioux would have enabled them to annihilate the Chipeways long since had it not been forthe nature of their [the Chipeways’] country, which entirely precludes the possibility of an attack on horseback. Thisalso gives them a decided advantage over an enemy halfarmed with arrows, as the least twig of a bush will turnthe shaft of death out of its direction; whereas, the whizzing bullet holds its course nor spends its force short of the destined victim. Thus we generally have found that when engaged in a prairie the Sioux came off victorious; but if in the woods, even if not obliged to retreat, the carcasses oftheir slaughtered brethren showed how dearly they purchased the victory.

The Sioux are bounded on the N. E. and N. by these two powerful nations, the Chipeways and Knisteneaux[Crees], whose manners, strength, and boundaries are ably described by Sir Alexander McKenzie. The Assinniboins, or Stone Sioux, who border the Chipeways on the N. W.and W., are a revolted band of the Sioux, who have maintained war with the parent nation for about a century, andhave rendered themselves their most violent enemies. They extend from the Red river W. nearly to the Rocky Mountains, and are computed at 1,500 warriors. They reside on the plains, and follow the buffalo; consequently they have very little occasion for traders or European productions.

CHAPTER IX.

VOCABULARY OF MISSISSIPPIAN PLACE-NAMES.[IX-1]

English. French. Indian.
Natural Meadow Prairie
Buffalo river Riviere au B — uf
Salt river Riviere au Sel Oahaha
River of Means Riviere de Moyen
Iowa river Riviere de Ayoua
Stony, or Rock river Riviere des Rochers
Turkey river Riviere au Dindon
Dog’s meadow Prairie Des Chien
    Ouiscousing
Raven river Riviere de Corbeau
Yellow river Riviere Jaune
Root river Riviere aux Racines
River of Embarrassments Riviere d’Embarras
Clear Water river Riviere l’Eau Clair
River of the Prairie of Cross Riviere de la Prairie de Crosse
Chipeway river Riviere Sauteaux Ouchipewa Sippi
The Mountain which soaks in the Water La Montaigne qui trempe dans l’Eau
River of do Riviere de do
Sandy point Point de Sable
The Barn La Grange
Cannon River Riviere a Canon
River St. Peters Riviere St. Pierre
Falls of St. Anthony Shute de St. Antoine
Rum river Prairie l’Eau de Vie
Leaf river Riviere aux Feuilles
Sauk river Riviere aux Saukes
Big Falls Grand rapid
Lower Red Cedar lake Le Bas Lac du Cedre Rouge
Raven island Isle de Corbeau
Pine river Riviere au Pin
Leech lake Lac Sang Sue
Sandy lake Lac de Sable
Pike river Riviere du Brochet
Bottom of the lake Fond du Lac
Swan river Riviere a Cigue
Falls of Packegamaw Petite Shute Packegamaw
Upper Red Cedar lake Le Haut Lac de Cedre Rouge
Red lake Lac Rouge
Green bay La Baye Verde
St. Ignatius St. Ignace
Oak Point Point au Chene
    Meno Cockien
The Turn La Detour
Island of the Turn Isle du Detour
Burnt island Isle Brule
Potowatomies island Isle des Poux
Little Streight Petit Detroit
Port of the Dead Port des Morts
Vermillion island Isle Vermilion
Red river Riviere Rouge
Stinking rapid Puant Rapid
Wolf river Riviere des Loups
Hillock of the dead Butte des Morts
    Lac Puckway
Muddy lake Lac Vaseux
STOPPED HERE

FOOTNOTES

[OP-1] The publisher owes it to truth, and to Colonel Pike, to state that he verymuch doubts whether any book ever went to press under so many disadvantagesas the one now presented to the public. Some of those disadvantages must beobvious to every man who reads the work; but there are many others of anature not sufficiently interesting for publication, yet of sufficient magnitude toretard the work, embarrass the publisher, and impose more anxiety than has fallen to his lot in the various books which he has published. It is, however, confidently believed that, not withstanding all those circumstances, the Journal and its Appendixes will be found particularly interesting and pregnant with important information.

[NP-1] Since these words were penned Mr. Hill has made the long portage, alas!His death occurred at St. Paul, on the 15th inst.

[M-1] Henry Whiting of Massachusetts entered the army as a cornet of LightDragoons Oct. 29th, 1808; he became a second lieutenant Sept. 15th, 1809,and a first lieutenant Aug. 20th, 1811; was transferred to the 5th InfantryMay 17th, 1815; promoted to be captain Mar. 3d, 1817; and transferred to the 1st Artillery June 1st, 1821. He became major and quartermaster Feb. 23d,1835; lieutenant-colonel and deputy quartermaster-general, July 7th, 1838; colonel and assistant quartermaster-general, Apr. 21st, 1846. He was repeatedly brevetted for faithful and meritorious service, and on Feb. 23d, 1847, received the brevet of brigadier-general for gallantry in the battle of Buena Vista. General Whiting died Sept. 16th, 1851.

[M-2] Access to these records was given in the following terms:

War Department,
Washington, D. C.,
January 29, 1894.

Sir:

As requested in your letter of the 22nd instant, I take pleasure in advising you that you will be afforded an opportunity at such time as you may call at the Department to examine for historical purposes such records as are on file covering the expedition of Z. M. Pike, a publication of whose travels you state firstappeared in 1810.

Very respectfully,
[Signed] Daniel S. Lamont,
Secretary of War.

Dr. Elliott Coues,
Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, D. C.

[M-3] See beyond, p. lix, for a document bearing on the Pike family, in connection with a letter of Zebulon M. Pike, both introduced in their proper chronological order in this memoir. But I find no better place than this for a letter from his father, which has never been published before and will be read with interest:

Indiana Territory
Dear born County
July 15th 1807

Sir

I have taken the liberty of making out my accounts of Pay Forrage and Subsistance from the 1t of January to the 31t inst and forwarded them to the PayMaster for payment which I pray may meet your approbation

Permit me to request the Honor of a few lines informing if Z. M. Pike received orders for His Government on His late exploring expedition, from The President, Yourself, or Genl Wilkinson, and if any or how late the last informationor communications from Him. I need not mention how disagreeable a stateof Suspense is, nor, to move your sympathy, to say more than that the anxiety and concern, exhibited for His safety, by an affectionate Mother and Wife, is Great.By way of consolation to the former, I have thought proper to extend the probable Period of His return, untill this month; Mrs Pike is now begining tolose confidence in my opinion, consequently my consolating influence is daily lesening, and Her afflictions increasing — —

I decline in Strength as regular as Time paseth and However Painfull the reflection, It is by the Bounty of my Country Life is rendered Tolerable

Be assured I write in Pain as well that I am

Your Very Obedt. Servt.
Zebn Pike — —

Henry Dear born
Secretary of War — —

This letter is endorsed in General Dearborn’s handwriting: "Tell him hisson is safe, and is probably at Natchitoches" — where Captain Pike had in factarrived July 1st, 1807. The Secretary of War at the same time ordered attentionto the matter of Major Pike’s pay and allowances, mentioned in the letter.

[M-4] Historical Register of the United States Army, from its Organization, September29th, 1789, to September 29th, 1889. By F. B. Heitman, Clerk, AdjutantGeneral’s office, War Department, Washington, D. C., 1890, 1 vol., large 8vo,pp. 890. I make a point throughout Pike of identifying as far as possible theofficers whose names appear in his text, giving in brief their official records, anddoing the same for those who are mentioned in my own writing. I am indebtedto Heitman’s invaluable work for most such matter.

[M-5] This officer was a native of Canada, appointed to the army from New York. He had served as a captain in the Revolutionary Army when he was commissionedas a major of Infantry Sept. 29th, 1789; he was assigned to the 1stInfantry Mar. 3d, 1791, and arranged to the Second sub-Legion Sept. 4th,1792; he became lieutenant-colonel commandant of the First sub-Legion Feb.18th, 1793, and colonel of the 1st Infantry Apr. 1st, 1802; his death occurredApr. 11th, 1803. (Another John Francis Hamtramck, of Indiana, was asergeant in the 1st Infantry before he became a cadet at West Point, wherehe was graduated in 1819, continued to be an officer of the army till 1848, anddied in 1858.)

[M-6] The time when these officers were together at Camp Alleghany must have been prior to Aug. 19th, 1801, when Lieutenant-Colonel David Strong died.He was from Connecticut; entered the army as a captain of Infantry Sept. 29th,1789; became major of the 2d Infantry Nov. 4th, 1791; was arranged to theSecond sub-Legion Sept. 4th, 1792; promoted to be lieutenant-colonel Feb.19th, 1793, and held that rank in the 2d Infantry from Nov. 1st, 1796. — MosesPorter, of Massachusetts, had served in the Revolutionary Army whenhe became a lieutenant of Artillery Sept. 29th, 1789; he was promoted to becaptain Nov. 4th, 1791; major May 26th, 1800, and colonel Mar. 12th, 1812;brevetted brigadier-general Sept. 10th, 1813, for distinguished services, anddied April 14th, 1822. — Edward D. Turner, of Massachusetts, entered thearmy as an ensign of the 2d Infantry Mar. 4th, 1791; became a lieutenantJuly 13th, 1792; captain, Nov. 11th, 1793, and was brigade inspector fromNov. 1st, 1799, to April 1st, 1802; he resigned Nov. 30th, 1805. — RichardHumphrey Greaton (not "Graeton"), of Massachusetts, was made a lieutenantin the 2d Infantry Mar. 4th, 1791; became captain Feb. 18th, 1793, and was honorably discharged June 1, 1802. — Theodore Sedgwick, of Massachusetts,became an ensign of the 2d Infantry Mar. 4th, 1791; lieutenant, July 30th,1792; captain, Dec. 29th, 1793, and was honorably discharged June 1st, 1802. — PeterShoemaker, of Pennsylvania, appointed ensign in the 2d Infantry Apr.11th, 1793; became lieutenant Mar. 3d, 1793; captain, Mar. 3d, 1799, andwas honorably discharged June 1st, 1802. — Nanning John Visscher, of NewYork, entered the army as an ensign in the 2d Infantry Mar. 16th, 1792;became lieutenant May 1st, 1794, and captain Nov. 1st, 1799; he was honorablydischarged June 1st, 1802; was afterward made a captain of Rifles Apr.26th, 1809; resigned Nov. 30th, 1812, and died Dec. 12th, 1821. — ArchibaldGray (not "Grey"), of Virginia, was made an ensign of Infantry Mar. 7th,1792; lieutenant, May 1st, 1794; was assigned to the 2d Infantry Nov. 1st,1796; became captain Nov. 1st, 1799, and resigned July 1st, 1801. — JesseLukens, of Pennsylvania, was appointed an ensign in the Second sub-LegionFeb. 23d, 1793; became lieutenant Oct. 1st, 1793; was assigned to the 2dInfantry Nov. 1st, 1796; promoted to be captain Mar. 3d, 1799, and died May21st, 1801. — Ferdinand Leigh Claiborne, of Virginia, was made an ensign ofthe First sub-Legion Feb. 23d, 1793; lieutenant, June 30th, 1794; assigned tothe 1st Infantry Nov. 1st, 1796; promoted to be captain Oct. 23d, 1799, andresigned Jan. 1st, 1802; he was afterward a colonel and brigadier-general ofVolunteers in the war of 1812-14, and died in February, 1815. — Benjamin Rand,of Massachusetts, became ensign in the Second sub-Legion May 12th, 1794;was assigned to the 2d Infantry as such Nov. 1, 1796; became lieutenantMar. 10th, 1797, and resigned Dec. 29th, 1800. — John Whipple became anensign in the 2d Infantry July 10th, 1797; a lieutenant Mar. 2d, 1799;was transferred to the 1st Infantry April 1st, 1802; made captain Apr. 11th,1803, and resigned Jan. 31st, 1807. — Peter Shiras (not "Schiras"), of Pennsylvania,was commissioned a second lieutenant of the 2d Infantry Mar. 3d,1799; promoted to be first lieutenant Nov. 22d, 1799, and honorably dischargedJune 1, 1802. — Moses Hook, of Massachusetts, was commissioned as a secondlieutenant of the 1st Infantry Mar. 3d, 1799; became first lieutenant Oct.23d, 1799; captain, Mar. 13th, 1805, and resigned Jan. 20th, 1808. (MerriwetherLewis intended to take this officer with him, in the event of WilliamClark’s declination of his invitation: on this point, see Lewis and Clark, ed.1893, pp. xxiv, lxx.) — John Wilson, of Pennsylvania, was a second lieutenantof the 2d Infantry from Mar. 3d, 1799, to Nov. 22d, 1799, when hebecame first lieutenant; he was honorably discharged June 1st, 1802. — JamesDill, of Pennsylvania, was made a second lieutenant of the 2d Infantry Mar.3d, 1799; a first lieutenant Nov. 1st, 1799, honorably discharged June15th, 1800. — The above named Lieut. Williams is not fully identified. — HenryB. Brevoort, of New York, was commissioned a second lieutenant of the 3dInfantry Feb. 16th, 1801, and retained as an ensign in the 2d Infantry May7th, 1802 ( — ); was second lieutenant of the same July 1st, 1802; first lieutenantNov. 30th, 1805; captain May 1st, 1811; major in the 45th Infantry Apr.15th, 1814, and honorably discharged June 15th, 1815. — Daniel Hughes, ofMaryland, was made an ensign of the 9th Infantry Jan. 8th, 1799; a secondlieutenant Mar. 3d. 1799, and honorably discharged June 15th, 1800; he wasreappointed second lieutenant of the 2d Infantry Feb. 16th, 1801, andtransferred to the 1st Infantry Apr. 1st, 1802; became first lieutenant Mar.23d, 1805; captain, Dec. 15th, 1808; major of the 2d Infantry Feb. 21st,1814 and was honorably discharged June 15th, 1815. — The Lieutenant"Hilton" is probably an error. — For James B. Many see note38, p. 210. — UriahBlue, of Virginia, was commissioned as a second lieutenant ofthe 8th Infantry July 12th, 1799, and honorably discharged June 15th,1800; reappointed as a second lieutenant in the 2d Infantry Feb. 16th,1801, and honorably discharged again June 1st, 1802; reappointed as first lieutenant of the 7th Infantry May 3d, 1808; became captain May9th, 1809; major of the 39th Infantry Mar. 13th, 1814; was honorablydischarged June 15th, 1815, and reinstated Dec. 2d, 1815, as a captain in the8th Infantry, to rank as such from May 9th, 1809, and with brevet of majorfrom Mar. 13th, 1814; he resigned Dec. 3d, 1816, and died in May, 1836. — EdwardButler, of Pennsylvania, had been a captain in the levies of 1791,when he was made a captain of Infantry Mar. 5th, 1792, and arrangedto the Fourth sub-Legion Sept. 4th, 1792; acted as adjutant and inspectorfrom July 18th, 1793, to May 13th, 1794; was assigned to the 4th InfantryNov. 1st, 1796, and transferred to the 2d Infantry April 1st, 1802; died May9th, 1803. (For Williams and "Hilton" see these names in Index.)

[M-7] John De Barth Walbach was a native of Germany, who was commissioned from Pennsylvania as a lieutenant of Light Dragoons Jan. 8th, 1799, and honorablydischarged June 15th, 1800. He re-entered the service as a lieutenantof the 2d Artillerists and Engineers Feb. 16th, 1801, and was retained in theArtillerists April 1st, 1802; he became captain Jan. 31st, 1806, and was transferredto the Corps of Artillery May 12th, 1814. During the war he served invarious capacities, with ranks of major and colonel, and was among thoseretained as captain of Artillery May 17th, 1815. He became major Apr. 25th,1818, and was transferred to the 1st Artillery June 1st, 1821; promoted to belieutenant-colonel May 30th, 1832, and to be colonel of the 4th ArtilleryMarch 19th, 1842. He was repeatedly brevetted for gallant, meritorious,and faithful services; his latest brevet being that of brigadier-general Nov.11th, 1823. General Walbach died June 10th, 1857. An unpublished letterbefore me, from General Wilkinson to the Secretary of War, dated St. Louis,Nov. 26th, 1805, refers to Lieutenant Walbach in the following terms: "Inevery cavalry arrangement I must beg leave to call Walbach to your recollection,as the ablest horse officer in America, not only in the choice of animals, but inequipping, training, forming, and heading them to action."

Alexander Macomb was commander-in-chief of the army from May 29th,1828, to his death, June 25th, 1841. He was brevetted major-general Sept.11th, 1814, and received the thanks of Congress Nov. 3d, 1814, for distinguishedand gallant conduct at Plattsburgh, N. Y. General Macomb enteredthe army as a cornet of Light Dragoons Jan. 10th, 1799; attained the rank ofbrigadier-general in 1814, and major-general in 1828.

Jonathan Williams, of Massachusetts, was appointed from Pennsylvania a major of the 2d Artillerists and Engineers Feb. 16th, 1801; he served as inspector of fortifications from Dec. 14th, 1801, to June 1st, 1802, and wasretained as major of Engineers April 1st, 1802. He resigned June 20th, 1803;was made lieutenant-colonel and chief engineer Apr. 19th, 1805, and promotedto be colonel Feb. 23d, 1808. He resigned again July 31st, 1812,and died May 20th, 1815.

[M-8] Note by Lieutenant J. R. Williams, May 19th, 1894: "The foregoing is a literal copy of the rough draft of John R. Williams’ letter to Major Holton.The fair copy of course is not in my possession, but I have reason to believethe fair copy must contain several of the peculiar errors of the writer, whoseearly education was wholly French, so that he never, as far as I know, capitalizedthe initial letters of such words as English and French. John R. Williams,writer of this letter, entered the 2d U. S. Infantry as a cadet early in 1800, butappears to have resigned in about six months. He was subsequently connectedwith the same regiment for about a year in the capacity of agent of the contractorfor commissary supplies. The title of general, by which he is wellremembered in Detroit, was acquired by his connection with the militia ofMichigan for about 40 years, as adjutant-general and major-general."

[M-9] This is a remarkable book, which has had a very exceptional career, theend of which is not even yet. Robert Dodsley, b. 1703, d. Sept. 23d, 1764,was in early life a menial in the service of Hon. Mrs. Lowther, but became byhis natural talents a wealthy publisher, as well as a prolific author. In thelatter capacity he was scarcely rated as more than a hack writer in his lifetime,during which he was probably never suspected of having written an immortalbook. Whether this was a stroke of his own genius or not is questionable;but he should have the full credit of the book, until an extraneous source of hisinspiration can be instanced. The — conomy of Human Life was first publishedanonymously in a collection of miscellanies, in 1745, and soon acquiredgreat repute, in part at least due to the fact that it was commonly attributed toLord Chesterfield. It ran through many editions in various styles, some ofthem finely illustrated. The earlier ones all preserved the author’s anonymity,and in more than one reprint of very late years his incognito is formally preserved.An anonymous edition of 1806, which I have handled, consists only ofBook I, Parts i-vii, entitled as follows: The | — conomy | of | Human Life, |translated from an | Indian Manuscript, | written by an Ancient Bramin | — |London: | printed for W. Gardiner, Pall-Mall; and | Vernor, Hood, andSharpe, Poultny. | 1 vol., 12mo, pp. i-x, 1 leaf, pp. 1-116, and many engr.head- and tail-pieces. Another, of 1809, with the authorship avowed, is asfollows: The | Economy | of | Human Life. | In Two Books. | — | By RobertDodsley. | — | With six elegant engravings by Mackenzie, | from designs byCraig and Unwins. | — | London: | [etc., 4 lines of printers’ names] | — |1809. 1 vol., 16mo, 1 prel. leaf, vignette title, pp. i-xviii, 5-188; portrait andmemoir of Dodsley, and 5 full-page engravings; said to have been pub.Jan. 31st, 1809. The copy Pike had was most probably one of the cheapAmerican reprints which appeared about this time. Dodsley’s book consists ofphilosophical and moral reflections or aphorisms in curt, sententious style, ofdistinctly Oriental flavor; it is feigned to be based upon manuscripts ofimmense antiquity, discovered in the capital of Tibet by an emissary of theemperor of China, and in some occult manner received in England and translated.I liked the thing so much that I lately brought out a new edition myself,preserving the author’s feigned origin of the book and his own incognito, transposingsome of the pieces, adding a new "foreword" in antique style, andmodifying the title to — Kuthumi: The True and Complete — conomy ofHuman Life, etc. In this guise Dodsley’s book forms No. 5 of my BiogenSeries, Boston, Estes and Lauriat, 1886; 1 vol., small square 8vo, pp. i-x,1-123.

[M-10] Another good editorial version of Pike’s Mississippi itinerary appeared inthe tract entitled: Materials for the Future History of Minnesota, etc., thesame being Part V. of the publications of the Minn. Hist. Soc., 8vo, St. Paul,1856, pp. about 142. The five separately issued Parts, dating 1850-56, were in1872 collectively republished in a second edition, forming Vol. I. of the Collectionsof the Minn. Hist. Soc., 8vo, pp. 1-519. In this reprint the article isentitled: Pike’s Explorations in Minnesota, 1805-06, and occupies pp. 368-416,or 48 pages, being thus about as extensive as the text of 1807. The editorsays that his aim was "to make judicious extracts" from Pike’s journal; andhe certainly succeeded in this intention. The editor’s name does not appear;but as the footnotes which explain or amplify various points in the text aresigned "W.," an initial of Mr. J. Fletcher Williams, who was secretary of thesociety and editor of its publications for many years, the work is presumablyhis, being thus an authentic as well as a genuine account of the Mississippivoyage. This publication therefore ranks side by side with the originalunknown editor’s performance, though the two are separated by an interval ofhalf a century.

[M-11] Thomas W. Field, Essay towards an Indian Bibl., etc., 1873, p. 313,throws the mantle of charity in the following terms: "Captain Pike could becharged with no association in this misdemeanor, as the work was edited andpublished in his absence on duty." This is true only in so far as the forerunnerof the Mississippi voyage is concerned (see above, p. xxxiii,) and conveys anerroneous impression regarding Pike’s princeps edition, in which the plagiarismoccurs. For Pike wrote this book himself, and necessarily knew everythingthere was in it. See beyond, p. lxi, where the circumstances under which it wasprepared are adduced from hitherto unpublished documents.

[M-12]"REPORT OF A LATE OCCURRENCE IN THIS PROVINCE OF NEW MEXICO.

"On the 15th of February last two Indians of the Ute tribe arrived and brought into my presence an Anglo-American, a young man of genteel appearance[joben de presencia fina, as Dr. Robinson appeared to be], whose statementI heard, and even invited him to dine with me, in order to satisfy myselfhe was what I supposed him to be as to intelligence and good breeding.

"I did not believe him, and suspecting the truth of his statement as to thenature of his escort, I sent out a small regular detachment and some provincial troops to reconnoitre, who not only fell in with a first lieutenant with sixsoldiers in an excellent fort built on the Conejos not far from its junction withthe Del Norte, two days’ journey from the capital of this province, towards thesame direction [acia el mismo rumbo], but overcoming the obstacles of deepsnows, succeeded in finding the sergeant [Meek] and corporal [meaning PrivateMiller] belonging to the detachment, making a total of thirteen soldiers, two ofthem [Dougherty and Sparks] with frozen feet, and having lost nearly all theirfingers. [Compare p. 510, beyond.]

"On the 2d of March last, the above-mentioned lieutenant, whose name is Mungo-Meri-Paike, came in with six men of his detachment, and on the 18th the remainder of his men. Without any resistance they acquiesced in the notificationmade them, that being in my territory it was absolutely necessary thatthey should appear before me.

"They did so, with their arms, and I assured them that in no respect should they be treated as prisoners, saving only that, in accordance with the orders ofthe general commanding, it was necessary that they should appear before himand fully explain the objects of their mission.

"Paike showed me his instructions from General Wilkinson, his journal, and a rough sketch of a chart of all the rivers and countries he had explored.

"Placing all which papers in a trunk, of which I requested him to retain the key, I delivered the same to the officer [Capitan Antonio D’Almansa: see p. 611]commanding his escort — not to be opened save in presence of the aforesaidgeneral commanding.

"From all which circumstances, from what I gathered from Robinson and from the above named officer, I conclude distinctly that the expedition of July [last — 1806] was specially designed to conciliate two Indian tribes in behalf ofthe U. S. Government, to make them liberal presents, and drawing them intofriendship, treaty, and commerce, to place them under the Anglo-American protection — allthis referring especially to the Comanche tribe, the most powerfulof our allies.

"Furthermore, that the Anglo-American government considers as included within the boundaries of Louisiana all the rivers that empty into the Mississippi, and all the territories that extend to the head waters of the Rio Colorado [meaningthat Red r. which is the branch of the Arkansaw now called the Canadian r.as Meline explains in a footnote], which rises a few leagues from the puebloof Taos further to the north in this province; that it is their intention this yearor the next to establish forts or settlements on all these rivers, in order to monopolizeall the trade and commerce carried on by a large number of tribes in theprovince.

"The detachment of Anglo-American troops referred to, went to Chihuahuato appear before the commanding general, guarded by an escort, being allowed to carry their arms and ammunition on account of the danger of hostile Apacheson the route.

"All of which is submitted to the general commanding, reminding him of there presentation made in my communication of the 4th of January last year, concerning the necessity of placing this province on a respectable footing, and of having frontier posts and positions thrown out to oppose the ambitious views ofthe aforesaid Anglo-American government, exposing also the wretchedly defenseless condition actually existing, and so found for years past by whomsoever hasbeen in command.

"Santa Fé, April 1st, 1807."

[M-13] The reputation of General Wilkinson for honor and patriotism went undera cloud, from which it has never been cleared, in connection with the Burr conspiracy. He was technically acquitted, from lack of evidence to convict;but the proof that he was a mercenary traitor subsequently appeared. GeneralWinfield Scott is reported to have called him an "unprincipled imbecile."Governor Adams has lately put the case bluntly, but as I believe truthfully,Address, July 12th, 1894, p. 20: "General Wilkinson, then in command of thewestern army, has been proven by recently discovered documents to have been’a rascal through and through.’ He was in sympathy and perhaps in the confidenceof Burr. Wearing the uniform and sword of an American officer, hewas in the pay of Spain, and conspired to create out of the colonies west of themountains a Spanish empire. It was Wilkinson who sent Pike west; but nomatter how guilty may have been his superior in command, Pike certainly hadno knowledge of his schemes. Pike was innocent of any stain. He was apatriot as pure and sincere as Wilkinson was a traitor base and ungrateful."While there is no question of Pike’s perfervid patriotism, we may doubt that hislamb’s-wool was as white as all that; in fact, Governor Adams himself goes onto say: "It is not entirely clear that Pike was as innocent as he professed of hiswhereabouts when captured in the San Luis valley. Some believe he knew hewas upon the Rio Grande, and not upon the Red [river], as he pretended tobelieve. But had it been the Red instead of the Rio Grande, what right had heto be on the south [i. e., west] side of the river, his rude fort being several milessouth [west] of the stream and under an abeyance treaty upon forbidden ground — The Spaniards believed that Pike carried secret orders to intrude upon theirterritory."

This belief of the Spaniards was well founded: compare my notes at p. 499,p. 504, p. 563, and p. 571. Colonel Meline corroborates the general tenor andpurport of these observations, in the following terms, p. 313 of his work alreadycited:

"Wilkinson’s bulky and diffuse published memoirs may be searched in vainfor any information concerning Pike’s expedition, and his silence on the subject is, to say the least, suggestive.

"Of his complicity with Burr but little doubt is now entertained and proofs are not wanting of the existence of his designs upon Mexico, from the period of his note in cypher to Governor Gayoso de Lemas (February, 1797), and hisdealings with [Captain Philip] Nolan, down to the conspiracy of 1806.

"It has been stated that Wilkinson himself planned the exploring expeditionof Pike, in order to obtain for his own purposes a more perfect knowledge of the country, and that he availed himself of his official authority to have it ordered by the Government. [See note2, p. 564.]

"The Mississippi Herald of September 15th, 1807, published the affidavit of Judge Timothy Kibby, of the Louisiana Territory, acting Chief Justice of theCourt of Common Pleas for the district of St. Charles.

"The affidavit sets forth —

"’That in confidential conversation the general (Wilkinson) speaking of Pike’s Expedition, upon inquiry, replied, smiling, that it was of a secretnature, and that Lieutenant Pike himself was not apprised of the ultimateobject of the expedition, but that his destination was Santa Fé, treating withthe Indians as he advanced.

"’He (Wilkinson) intimated that Lieutenant Pike had been dispatched byhis orders; that the plan was his own, not emanating from the Government, but assented to.’"

With these pertinent particulars I could — but need not — forbear to couplethe racy characterization given by Mr. Prentis, p. 198 of his Kansan Abroad:

"The military officer in charge of the western country at that time [1806]was General James Wilkinson, a restless, bombastic, fussy old gentleman, with arare faculty for getting into difficulties. As an officer in the Revolutionary army, he was concerned in the [Thomas] Conway cabal, a plot to supplant Washington,and place in his stead General Gates, an officer who afterwards got beautifullythrashed by the British at Camden. He turned up in the army, after being fora while a merchant at Lexington, Kentucky, in 1791; received Louisiana fromthe French in 1803, and contrived to get mixed up in the Burr business to suchan extent that nobody knows to this day, I believe, which side he was on. Hewas investigated, court-martialed, and acquitted; went into the war of 1812;served on the Canadian frontier; was a conspicuous failure; was court-martialedagain [subjected to a court of inquiry], and again acquitted; and finally, therebeing in those days no chance to enter the lecture field, he wrote his memoirs[1816], and retired to the City of Mexico, where he died.

"General James Wilkinson in his day was probably the subject of more uncomplimentary remarks than any man of his caliber in the country, and I deem it no more than justice to say for him, that, with all his faults, he was thesteadfast friend of Zebulon M. Pike."

I may add, that left-hand compliments to this notorious individual have been current from that day to this, and are still in order. One of the keenest of them is attributed to a distinguished contemporary who, it is said, favored his appointment to the command of the army as the only way of "keeping him out ofmischief"!

The following is the formal official record of General Wilkinson: Of Maryland, appointed from that State colonel and adjutant-general in Gates’ armyduring the Revolutionary war with brevet of brigadier-general from Nov. 6th,1777; lieutenant-colonel commanding the 2d Infantry Oct. 22d, 1791;brigadier-general March 5th, 1792; commander-in-chief of the army from Dec. 15th, 1796, to July 13th, 1798, and from June 15th, 1800, to Jan. 27th,1812; brevet major-general, July 10th, 1812; major-general, Mar. 2d, 1813;honorably discharged June 15th, 1815; died Dec. 28th, 1825.

[M-14] Thomas Hunt of Massachusetts had been a captain in the Revolutionary Army when he was made a captain of the 2d Infantry Mar. 4th, 1791; he was assigned to the Second sub-Legion Sept. 4th, 1792; was promoted to a majority Feb. 18th, 1793; was in the 1st Infantry Nov. 1st, 1796; made a lieutenant-colonel Apr. 1st, 1802, and colonel April 11th, 1803; he died Aug. 18th, 1808,and it fell to the part of Pike to announce his death to the War Department.

[M-15] Baron Friedrich Wilhelm August Heinrich Ferdinand von Steuben, the Prussian-American general, b. Magdeburg, Nov. 17th, 1730, d. New York, Nov. 28th, 1794. He entered the Prussian military service in 1744, rising tothe rank of adjutant-general and staff officer, 1762; was distinguished atPrague, Rossbach, Kunersdorf, 1757-1759, and at the siege of Schweidnitz; and later, in 1764, was grand marshal to the Prince of Hohenzollern. In 1777 he came to the United States, reaching Portsmouth, N. H., Dec. 1st; was appointed by Washington inspector-general, with the rank of major-general,May 5th, 1778; and reorganized the army. He served at Monmouth and Yorktown, and was a member of the court-martial on André in 1780. Hismanual for the army was approved by Congress in 1779; in 1790 he was votedby that body a life-annuity of $2,500; and New York State gave him 16,000acres near Utica. Various places are named Steuben or Steubenville. Life byF. Bowen in Sparks’ Amer. Biogr. Life by F. Kapp, N. Y., 1860.

[M-16] Cited from Hezekiah Niles’ Weekly Register, III. No. 9, pp. 133, 134,Oct. 31st, 1812, into which it was copied from the Philadelphia Aurora, headed"15th Regiment. To the editor of the Aurora." I copy literally from the Register, but with modern punctuation, as I shall do in subsequent extracts from the same source.

[M-17] William Swan appears in Heitman’s Register as major of the "2 inf" in1813. On the supposition that this is a typographical error for 21st Infantry, which was engaged at York, the record may be given as that of the above-named Major Swan: Of Massachusetts, appointed from that State a first lieutenant of the 15th Infantry Jan. 8th, 1799; honorably discharged June 15th, 1800; reappointed first lieutenant in the 1st Infantry Feb. 16th, 1801; captain Nov.15th, 1807; deputy-quartermaster-general April 3d, 1812; major "2 inf" i. e.21st Infantry, Jan. 20th, 1813; colonel and quartermaster-general from Aug.7th, 1813, to June 9th, 1814; lieutenant-colonel 20th Infantry March 13th, 1814; transferred to the 4th Infantry Apr. 30th, 1814; resigned June 9th, 1814; died June 12th, 1872.

[M-18] Eleazar Wheelock Ripley, b. Hanover, N. H., Apr. 15th, 1782, appointed from Massachusetts lieutenant-colonel 21st Infantry Mar. 12th, 1812; colonel of that regiment Mar. 12th, 1813; brigadier-general Apr. 15th, 1814; and brevet major-general July 25th, 1814, for gallantry at the battle of Niagara Falls. On the 3d of November, 1814, he was by resolution of Congress givena gold medal in testimony of appreciation of his conduct at the battles of Chippewa, Niagara, and Erie. He resigned Feb. 1st, 1820; was Democratic memberof Congress from Louisiana 1835-39: and d. in that State Mar. 2d, 1839.

[M-19] Of New York, appointed a captain of the 29th Infantry Mar. 24th, 1813;resigned Mar. 14th, 1814.

[M-20] From the narrative of Lieutenant Fraser, one of Pike’s staff officers, who was wounded by his side; it was published in the Philadelphia Aurora, and copied into Niles’ Register of Saturday, June 5th, 1813, IV. pp. 225, 226, from which I quote.

[M-21] Benjamin Forsyth of North Carolina originally entered the army as asecond lieutenant of the 6th Infantry Apr. 24th, 1800, but was very soon honorably discharged. He was reappointed as a captain of Rifles July 1st, 1808;became major Jan. 20th, 1813, and was brevetted lieutenant-colonel for distinguished services Feb. 6th, 1813. He was killed in action at Odelltown,N. Y., June 28th, 1814. "The death of this officer was in harmony with his character. After the taking of York, finding that the official account of the action gave him little credit for the conspicuous share he had in it, he becamesick and inactive, and kept himself in sullen seclusion among his own men, apparently determined that no services should be rendered, either by himself orhis men, since they were so inadequately rewarded, or so unduly estimated. He did little or nothing the residue of that campaign. Having been promoted beforethe following campaign, he, on the Champlain frontier, was put in command ofan advanced party, which was to engage the enemy and then fall back, in order to draw him into an ambush. Lieutenant-Colonel Forsyth was the last man whowas likely to fulfill such a plan. As soon as he opened the fight with the enemy, his instructions to fall back were either forgotten or ignored. Hisspirit could not brook a retreat, even for an ultimate advantage. He rushed onand fell, and lost, with his life, all the success that would probably have followedmore prudence, or strict obedience to orders." (Whiting, l. c.)

[M-22] William King of Delaware was appointed from Maryland a second lieutenant of the 5th Infantry May 3d, 1808; became first lieutenant Sept. 30th, 1810;captain, 15th Infantry, July 2d, 1812; major, Mar. 3d, 1813. He was made colonel of the 3d Rifles Feb. 21st, 1814; was transferred to the 4th Infantry May17th, 1815; honorably discharged June 1st, 1821; and died Jan. 1st, 1826.

Two officers named John Scott, both of New Jersey, both of the 15th Infantry,appear in Heitman’s Register. The captain above said was appointed as suchMar. 12th, 1812, resigned Aug. 15th, 1813, and died in 1839. The other John Scott did not rise above the rank of a subaltern. Possibly a single record in this case appears as those of two different persons. For Captain White Youngs, seenote37, p. cix. Captain Hoppock’s name appears as "Hopsock" in some places.

[M-23] Alexander C. W. Fanning of Massachusetts was appointed to a cadet ship at West Point April 14th, 1809; he was made a first lieutenant of the 3d Artillery Mar. 12th, 1812, and promoted to be a captain Mar. 13th, 1813; transferred tothe corps of artillery May 12th, 1814, and to the 2d Artillery June 2d, 1821;became major of the 4th Artillery Nov. 3d, 1832, and lieutenant-colonel Sept.16th, 1838; he was transferred to the 2d Artillery May 24th, 1841. On Aug.15th, 1814, he was brevetted major for gallant conduct at Fort Erie; on Aug.15th, 1824, he was brevetted lieutenant-colonel for 10 years’ faithful service inone grade; and on Dec. 31st, 1834, he was brevetted colonel for gallant andmeritorious conduct in battle near the Withlachoochee under General Clinchand in defending Fort Mellon, Florida; he died Aug. 18th, 1846.

[M-24] John Walworth of New York was appointed from that State first lieutenant of the 6th (sic — Heitman) Infantry Dec. 12th, 1808; was made captain Jan. 1st,1810; major of the 33d Infantry May 1st, 1814, and honorably discharged June 15th, 1815.

[M-25] Abram Eustis of Virginia, appointed from Massachusetts a captain of light artillery May 3d, 1808, became major of the same Mar. 15th, 1810. He wastransferred to the 4th Artillery June 1st, 1821; became lieutenant-colonel of the 2d Artillery May 8th, 1822; was transferred to the 4th Artillery Aug. 2d, 1822;became colonel of the 1st Artillery Nov. 17th, 1834, and brigadier-general June30th, 1834; he died June 27th, 1843.

[M-26] David Riddle of Pennsylvania, who had been appointed a second lieutenantof the 15th Infantry, was at that time a first lieutenant, ranking as such from Mar. 13th, 1813. He was transferred to the 8th Infantry May 17th,1815, and became captain Dec. 3d, 1816, when he had already been twice brevetted, for distinguished services at the battle of Niagara Falls, and forgallant conduct in the sortie from Fort Erie.

[M-27] Lossing says elsewhere that one of the officers told him his own life was probably saved by the bulk of this sergeant, who was blown against him. This officer was Lieutenant Fraser, one of Pike’s aids, whose own words on the subjectare given in Niles’ Register, IV. p. 226: "The general had just aided in removing a wounded man with his own hands, and sat down on a stump with a British sergeant we had taken prisoner, whom the general, with Captain Nicholson and myself, were examining, when the explosion took place. The general, Captain Nicholson, and the British sergeant, were all mortally wounded, and I was so much bruised in the general crash, that it is surprising how I survived; probably I owe my escape to the corpulency of the Britishser jeant, whose body was thrown upon mine by the concussion."

[M-28] The figures, vary, as usual. The official report gives our loss as 38 killed and 222 wounded by the explosion; which, added to 14 killed and 32 wounded in battle gives a total of 306 army casualties on our side in the whole affair; to which add 3 killed and 11 wounded of the navy, making 320 in all. Whiting’sfigures for killed and wounded, on the American side, are 320; on the British, in killed, wounded, and taken, "about 500." The tabular exhibit inNiles’ Register, IV. p. 238, is as follows:

Killed in battle — 1 subaltern, 2 sergeants, 1 corporal, 2 musicians,8 privates 14
Killed by the explosion — 1 captain, 4 sergeants, 4 corporals, 29privates 38
Total killed 52
Wounded in battle — 2 captains (one since dead), 1 subaltern, 3 sergeants,4 corporals, 22 privates 32
Wounded by the explosion — 1 brig. gen. (since dead), 1 aid-de-camp,1 acting aid, 1 volunteer aid, 6 captains, 6 subalterns, 11 sergeants,9 corporals, 1 musician, 185 privates 222
Total wounded 254
Total killed and wounded 306
Of the navy — 2 midshipmen and 1 seaman killed, 11 seamen wounded 14
Total killed and wounded 320

[M-29] The statement that General Sheaffe’s retreat was so precipitate that he losthis papers is confirmed by General Dearborn in a letter to the Secretary of War, dated Niagara, May 3d, 1813 (Niles’ Register, ibid.): "York was a magazine for Niagara, Detroit, etc., and not withstanding the immense amount which was destroyed by them, we found more than we could bring off. Gen.Sheaffe’s baggage and papers fell into my hands; the papers are a valuable acquisition. A scalp was found in the executive and legislative council chamber,suspended near the speaker’s chair in company with the mace, etc."

This "scalp incident," as it came to be known, and as I may remark in passing,became the probably groundless pretext for a storm of abuse of British methods of warfare. In the feverish state of public opinion which the startling climax of the battle of York excited almost to frenzy, it was regarded as adding insult to injury, and furthermore taken as a proof that our dead and wounded would be handed over by the British to their Indian allies, to be dealt with according to the customs of savage warfare. Thus, the usually temperate and judicious editor of the Register could permit himself to say: "The ’mace’is the emblem of authority, and the scalp’s position near it is truly symbolical ofthe British power in Canada. Horrible and infamous wretches! But thereign of the murderers is nearly at an end," p. 190. And again, p. 259, with"scalp" in large capitals, and various other typographical methods of relievinghis state of mind: "British humanity. When major-general Dearbornstated that a SCALP had been found in the government-house of Upper Canada,suspended near the mace, the emblem of power, many persons affected to doubt the fact; but most men believed, not only because General Dearborn hadstated the circumstance, but because it was strictly characteristic of the Britishgovernment, which is as base and deliberately wicked as any other in the civilized world. But the horrible fact is further and conclusively established by commodore Chauncey, whose testimony will not be disputed, openly, by those who pretended to disbelieve gen. Dearborn. Let us hear no more of ’Britishhumanity and religion’ — nor permit these great attributes to be lavished upon murderous villains. It is fact, horrible fact, that the legislature of ’unoffendingCanada’ did sanction (by hanging up in their hall, in evidence of their authority, a human scalp) the murders of our people by the savages. GreatHeaven!" This senseless outburst concludes with the following letter:

U. S. Ship Madison, Sackett’s Harbor, 4th June, 1813.

Sir — I have the honor to present to you by the hands of lieutenant Dudley, the British standard taken at York on the 27th of April last, accompanied by the mace, over which hung a human SCALP. — Those articles were taken from theparliament house by one of my officers and presented to me. The scalp I caused to be presented to general Dearborn, who I believe still has it in his possession. I also send by the same gentleman, one of the British flags taken at Fort George on the 27th of May.

I have the honor to be, very respectfully, sir, your most obedient humble servant,

[Signed] Isaac Chauncey.

Honorable Wm. Jones,
Secretary of the Navy, Washington.

It may be here added that the practice of scalping is by no means confined to the aborigines of North America. Among white Americans, it has never been too uncommon to excite remark, still less reprobation; and though it may not have been a regularly recognized and practiced incident of our warfare with Indians of late years, one has only to read any of the chronicles of our earlier warrings with Indian, English, or French foes, to perceive the entire reciprocity of the custom. It fell into desuetude, on our part, less from any disreputethan from sheer indifference. Instances are not lacking during the lastcentury, of our skinning whole Indians, tanning their hides, and manufacturing the leather into various articles of use or joy; and when we ceased to scalpas a rule, it was simply because scalps were no longer worth the trouble oftaking. I am myself no stranger to reeking Apache scalps, taken both by citizensand soldiery. I knew a young officer of our army who, in a spirit ofbravado, fastened an Apache scalp to each of his spurs, and wore them with the long black hair trailing at his heels during one of his hunts for Indians inArizona. The legislature of one of our Territories passed a bill offering a reward of a certain sum of money for every "buck" Indian’s scalp which should be produced, and a certain other sum for the scalp of "anything in the shapeof an Indian," i. e., woman or child. The British general, Henry Hamilton,while lieutenant-governor at Detroit, had a regular tariff of prices both for prisoners and for scalps which he purchased from Indians and from white renegades,thus acquiring the soubriquet of "the hair-buying general," applied to him by George Rogers Clark. Honors are so easy on this score that they do not count in the game of war which the British played with their American cousins.

[M-30] "A distinguished officer who was in the battle at York states that, as hepassed the general, after he was wounded, he cried, ’Push on, my brave fellows,and avenge your general.’ As he was breathing his last the British standard was brought to him; he made a sign to have it placed under his head, and died without a groan."

[M-31] Cromwell Pearce of Pennsylvania. He had been appointed from his Statea first lieutenant of the 10th Infantry May 3d, 1799, and honorably discharged June 15th, 1800. His colonelcy of the 16th Infantry dated from April 25th,1813; he was honorably discharged June 15th, 1815, and died April 2d, 1852.

[M-32] George E. Mitchell of Maryland became major of the 3d Artillery May 1st,1812, and lieutenant-colonel Mar. 3d, 1813; he was brevetted colonel May 5th,1814, for gallant conduct in repelling the attack of British forces on Fort Oswego, N. Y.; transferred to corps of Artillery May 12th, 1814, and to 3dArtillery June 1st, 1821; he resigned the same day, and died June 28th, 1832.

[M-33] Samuel S. Conner of New Hampshire was appointed from Massachusetts major of the 21st Infantry, Mar. 12th, 1812; became lieutenant-colonel of the13th Infantry Mar. 12th, 1813; resigned July 14th, 1814, and died Dec. 17th,1820.

[M-34] Benjamin Nicholson of Maryland, who languished of his wounds till May 13th. He had been appointed a first lieutenant of the 14th InfantryMar. 12th, 1812, and promoted to be captain Mar. 3d, 1813.

[M-35] This is but a mild sample of the epithets by which Sheaffe’s firing of the magazine was stigmatized in phrases current at a time when invective was invoked till language was exhausted. In the cooling of overheated passions a sense of humor stole in to the relief of surcharged feelings, and execration of the shocking catastrophe subsided from the sublime to the ridiculous. "And it was notuntil after the capture of Fort George," says Whiting, p. 306, "that this explosion ceased to haunt, like a dreadful spectre, the American army. While preparing for that capture, it seemed to be a settled conviction in the mind of the commander-in-chief, that explosions were to be the ordinary means of warfarewith the British. On the point opposite Fort Niagara, and not far from Fort George, stood a lighthouse, which was made of stone. The common impression was, that these stones were to be discharged upon our heads whenever we made the attempt to land; it being taken for granted that we should land between that and a neighboring wood, as the open grounds there were completely commandedby the guns of our fort. Many British deserters came over during themonth which elapsed between the capture of York and Fort George. The question asked of each was, whether the lighthouse were mined. No answer intimated that it was; still it was determined to land at a safe distance from it, though the point chosen afforded the enemy an excellent cover, where his batteries could be silenced only by our vessels. After the landing had been effected, the lighthouse was approached by stragglers with much caution, until someone, more hardy or more curious than the rest, entering into it, found within its recesses, instead of a Guy Fawkes, some women and children, whohad taken shelter there from the dangers of the day."

[M-36] Henry H. Van Dalsem of New Jersey became a captain of the 15th Infantry Mar. 12th, 1812, and resigned June 15th, 1815.

Joseph L. Barton of New Jersey was appointed a first lieutenant of the 15thInfantry Mar. 12th, 1812, promoted to be captain July 30th, 1812, and honorably discharged June 15th, 1815.

Abraham Godwin of New Jersey was appointed a second lieutenant of the15th Infantry Mar. 12th, 1812, became first lieutenant May 13th, 1813, andwas honorably discharged June 15th, 1815.

[M-37] White Youngs of New York was made a captain of the 15th InfantryMar. 12th, 1812; transferred to the 8th Infantry May 17th, 1815; brevettedmajor Sept. 11th, 1814, for gallant conduct at Plattsburgh, N. Y.; resignedMar. 8th, 1819, and died Dec. 8th, 1822.

[M-38] Daniel E. Burch of New Jersey was appointed from that State ensign in the 15th Infantry Oct. 7th, 1812; became third lieutenant Mar. 13th, 1813,and second lieutenant Aug. 15th, 1813: he was regimental paymaster fromMar. 12th, 1814, to June 15th, 1815, and honorably discharged June 15th, 1815.He re-entered the service as second lieutenant of the 7th Infantry Jan. 5th,1817; became first lieutenant June 7th, 1817, and captain June 30th, 1820;acted as assistant quartermaster from Oct. 25th, 1822, to June 27th, 1831;resigned Apr. 30th, 1833, and died May 8th, 1833.

[I-1] Roster of the party: 1. Lieutenant Z. M. Pike, 1st lieut. 1st regt. U. S.Infantry, comdg. — 2. Non-comm. officers: (1) Sergeant Henry Kennerman;(2) Corporal Samuel Bradley; (3) Corporal William E. Meek. — 3. Privates: (1)John Boley; (2) Peter Branden; (3) John Brown; (4) Jacob Carter; (5) ThomasDougherty; (6) William Gorden; (7) Solomon Huddleston; (8) Jeremiah Jackson;(9) Hugh Menaugh; (10) Theodore Miller; (11) John Mountjoy; (12)David Owings; (13) Alexander Roy; (14) Patrick Smith; (15) John Sparks;(16) Freegift Stoute; (17) David Whelply. This detail for detached servicewas made July 1st, 1805; returned Apr. 30th, 1806, without change, exceptingBradley promoted, vice Kennerman reduced to the ranks. Voyage of the9th was between St. Louis Co., Mo., and Madison Co., Ill., past Caberet’sisl. to camp on Illinois side at head of Chouteau’s isl.

The above roster of the Mississippi Expedition is derived from the Return ofPersons, etc., which formed a part of one of the Papers accompanying a Congressional Committee Report which was given as No. 6, pp. 64-68 of theAppendix to Part 3 of the orig. ed. of this work. It appears in full, in itsproper connection, at or near the end of the main text of the present edition.

The letter of instructions from General Wilkinson, dated St. Louis, July30th, 1805, in obedience to which Lieutenant Pike proceeded upon the Mississippi Expedition, likewise formed one of the Papers accompanying the sameCongressional Committee Report. It was given nowhere else in the orig.ed. of this book; though the corresponding instructions Pike received for hissecond (Arkansaw) Expedition were prefixed to the main text of his narrative.The Mississippi order appears in full, in its original position, near the end ofthe main text of the present edition.

[I-2] Or Du Bois r., Madison Co., Ill., notable in history as that at whosemouth Lewis and Clark had their winter camp of 1803-4, whence their expeditionstarted May 14th, 1804. At this date it was said to be opp. the mouth ofthe Missouri; it is now opp. the large Mobile isl. and the Missouri enters 2 m.below Wood r., through the Amazon bend.

[I-3] In undertaking to follow a traveler, the first thing to ascertain is his "personalequation" — i. e., the probable error of his mileages. Pike traveled entirelyby his watch, and all his distances are guesses based upon rate of progress — somany hours, so many miles. The way to approximate accuracy in thismatter is to take him between two fixed points whose actual distance apart isascertained, see what he makes of this, and adjust him accordingly. From St.Louis to Keokuk, by the present usual steamboat channel of the Miss. r., is202¼ m.; say to the foot of Des Moines rapids, roundly 200 m. Pike’s figures,as nearly as these can be got at, make this distance about 250 m. Hencewe must discount his mileages 20 per cent., or one-fifth, as a rule. Taking onething with another — changes in the channel in the course of the century, goodor bad water, Pike’s own feelings, errors of manuscript or print, etc., we shallfind this deduction to work well; with the aid of such topographical data as wehave, it will enable us to set most of his camps pretty closely. On the 10th,Pike gets left to bivouac on the bank at a point in Jersey Co., Ill., oppositePortage des Sioux, Mo., his barge being storm-bound somewhere above Alton,Ill., perhaps in the vicinity of Clifton or Randolph. The distance betweenAlton, first notable point above the Mo. r., and Grafton, last notable point belowthe Illinois r., is 16 m. Besides Alton and Clifton, places passed on the N.side are Shields’ branch, Hop Hollow, Falling Rock cr., and Piasa cr. — some ofthe present isls. above Mobile isl. are Maple, Ellis, Search’s, Piasa, and Eagle’sNest — the latter off Portage des Sioux.

[I-4] Portage des Sioux (or de Sioux) is that place in St. Charles Co., Mo., wherethe Mo. r. comes nearest to the Miss. r. before their confluence. It was thesite of an early settlement on the S. bank of the Miss. r., one François Saucierhaving first built on the spot, 1769 or 1770; the village was already therein Pike’s time, and still perpetuates the old F. name of the hostile Sioux’s crossing-place(ca. 1780) between the two great rivers, also called Sioux Portage orPortage of the Sioux: see Beck’s Gaz.; or Wetmore’s, p. 254.

[I-5] First great tributary of the Miss. r. above the Mo. r., falling in at Calhounpt., Calhoun Co., Ill., opp. Camden, Jersey Co., Ill.; Mason’s isl. the largestone of several more in the Miss. r. just below the mouth of the Ill. r. In comingS. the Miss. r. makes a great bend E. and then nearly N. to the confluence,whence it turns again to a course approx. coincident with that which the Ill. r.holds; hence Pike’s remark that the one might be mistaken for a part of theother. The river has had many names; the present is in form a French plural,sc. Rivière des Illinois, sc. of the people who lived on it — Illin, Illini, Illinoct,Illinoac, Illinoet, Illiniwek, Illeni, Illenois, Ilinois, Islinois, Islenois, etc.Pike’s map has Illenois; Franquelin’s, 1688, R. des Ilinois. Another aboriginalname, Theakiki, Teakiki, etc., whence Kankakee, was applied to one ofthe branches of this river. The Ill. r. sometimes shared the name St. Louiswith the Mississippi and the Ohio. It was called R. de Seignelay by Hennepin,in compliment to the marquis of that name; and once known as the Divine r.The importance of this river as a water-way from the Great Lakes to the Mississippiis second only to that of the Wisconsin, and would be first if the longprojected connection of St. Louis with Chicago by water were made. The useof these two rivers for this purpose was originally almost simultaneous; forJoliet and Marquette reached the Miss. r. from Green bay by the Wisc. r. June15th or 17th, 1673, came down the Miss. r. past the mouth of the Ill. r. in Julythat year, continued down to or near the Arkansaw, turned up the Miss. r. July17th, reached the Ill. r., and went up the latter to L. Michigan, Aug.-Sept.,1673. One of Joliet’s maps, 1674, clearly shows the Wis. r. and Ill. r. connectionsof the Miss. r. with L. Michigan and Green bay respectively. MichaelAccault’s party, consisting of himself, Antoine Auguelle, and L. Hennepin,dispatched by La Salle from Fort Crêvec — ur on the Ill. r., Feb. 29th, 1680,reached its mouth Mar. 7th, 1680; La Salle did the same himself Feb. 6th,1682. The latter — one of the very greatest men in the early history of Americandiscovery and exploration — came upon the Ill. r. in Dec., 1679, and madethe first French establishment on Lower Mississippian waters in Jan., 1680, atthe Illinois village Pimetoui, close to present Peoria.

[I-6] Among the islands (or their modern representatives) past which Pike struggledmay be named Perry, Squaw, Enterprise, and Iowa; the present channelis W. of all these excepting Squaw, taking through Hatchet chute to Rock ldg.and Milan, Calhoun Co., Ill. That island whose foot is now nearest 6 m. fromthe Illinois r. is Dardenne; but camp was more probably a mile short of this,where is now Bolter’s isl., as it is called — properly Boulder’s.

[I-7] About 21 m., Bolter’s isl. to the Four Brothers, at Cap au Grès. The presentrun of the principal islands is: Dardenne, Two Branch, Criminal, Peruque,Sweden, all below the mouth of Buffalo, Copper or Cuivre r. Dardenne cr.falls in on the left hand going up, right bank, opp. the island of that name; itappears as Dardonne on Owen’s map. Peruque cr. occupies a correspondingposition opp. Peruque and Sweden isls.; Nicollet’s map has Perruque. R.au Cuivre or aux B — ufs of the French, Copper and Buffalo r. of others("Quiver" r. of Lewis and Clark’s map, 1814), is a large stream whichcourses from Montgomery into Lincoln Co., Mo., and then, with its Big cr.branch, separates the latter from St. Charles Co.; it falls into Cuivre slough,which cuts off Cuivre isl., 3 m. long. At the upper end of this slough isthe mouth of the creek mapped by Nicollet as McLean’s, now as Bob, Bobb,Bobs, Bobbs, etc., cr. Some of the named places along the river are Brock’s,Dixon’s, Fruitland, Thomason’s, Beck’s, Two Branch, Martin’s, Hastings,Beech’s, and Bogtown — all insignificant, mostly mere landings, and all in CalhounCo., Ill., excepting Beck’s. Pike’s Four Brothers are represented byislands Nos. 499, 500, 501, and 502, of late surveys, not now abreast; all aresmall, and the largest one is called Sarah Ann. Pike’s "beautiful cedar cliff"is Cap au Grès rock, opposite a hamlet of the same name in Lincoln Co., Mo.;Dogtown, Ill., is under the cliff. The phrase is commonly rendered Cap auGre or Cap au Gris, by mistaking F. grès, a noun, meaning sandstone, for F.gris, adj., gray. Long of 1817, as pub. 1860 and again 1890, has a Little CapeGris; Beltrami, II. p. 196, renders Great Cape Gray. The exact distance tothis place from Grafton is 27 m.; from Alton, 43 m.; from St. Louis 66 m.

[I-8] Cap au Grès to Hamburg, Calhoun Co., Ill., 22 m.; river crooked, andchannel still more so; late start and much obstruction; Pike may hardly havereached Hamburg, but was in that vicinity, and we may set him there, in theabsence of any datum for greater precision. The "vast" number of islands hepassed have their modern representatives in such as: Sandy, 2½ m. long, withTurner’s near it; Stag and Maple, abreast; Sterling; Westport, 3½ m. long,with Kickapoo and Kelly’s alongside it. Along this whole way, on the lefthand going up, in Lincoln Co., Mo., runs a long slough approx. parallel withthe river. This is the discharge of Bryant’s cr., which approaches the riveropp. Hamburg, gets from the hills and runs in the bottom down to Sandy isl.;it is called Bayou au Roi on some maps, Bayou Roy on others. Nicollet chartsit with his usual accuracy, but without name. The principal places passed arethe villages of Sterling and Westport, Lincoln Co., Mo.; Gilead, back up onthe hill, in Calhoun Co., Ill.; lesser ones are the landings, wood-piles, or what-not,called Asbury, Turner’s, Hogtown, and Red’s. The St. L., Keok. andN. W. R. R. runs in the bottom along the bayou; stations Foley, Apex, Elsberry,and Dameron.

[I-9] Polyodon spatula, or Spatularia spatula, the paddlefish, also called spoon-billedcat or duck-billed cat, common in Mississippian waters. It sometimesattains a length of 5 or 6 feet; the shape resembles that of the sturgeon, butthe skin is scaleless, like a cat’s. One of the Relations ascribed to Hennepin,and pub. 1697, speaks of this fish as the "long-beaked sturgeon," and says itwas spawning Apr. 24th. Hennepin doubtless became acquainted with it whenhe was first on the Mississippi, under Accault, in 1680: see, e. g., Shea’s Tr.of Henp., 1880, p. 359.

[I-10] Doubtless one of the brothers mentioned in Lewis and Clark: see ed. 1893,pp. 1209, 1236, 1243.

[I-11] From Hamburg to Clarksville is 14½ m., Louisiana or Louisianaville, 24½;Pike went about 20, say to Krider’s bend, and his camp was on an island whichwe may take to be that now called Krider’s, 6 m. above Clarksville, 4 m. belowLouisiana. The "continuation of islands" is now the following in ascendingseries, omitting about a dozen small ones; Mosier’s or Mozier’s, and Howard’s,together, the former 1¾ m. long; Tilden’s; McCoy’s or Cock; Slim andGrimes, the former 3¼ m. long; Coon, 1 m.; Carroll’s or Carle’s, 1¾; Amaranth,small; Eagle, 1 m.; Clarksville, 2 m., opposite the town; Pharr’s, 1¾ m.;and Krider’s, 1 m. Above Mosier’s isl. and ldg., on the E., is the outlet ofHamburg bay, 3½ m. above the town; Bay cr. falls into it. Behind Slim isl.is the chute of that name, into which falls the large creek called Guin’s, Guinn’s,Gwin’s, etc.; and at the head of the island is the mouth of Ramsey’s cr.,another large one. These streams are both in Pike Co., Mo.; and as soon asPike passes opposite Clarksville he has Pike Co., Ill., on his right, so that hesails many miles with a county of his own on each side. Clarksville, Mo., issomething of a town, on the edge of the river, under the hill around whichCalumet cr. comes to fall in just above; and 3 m. higher comes Little Calumetcr. on the same side. Opposite Clarksville is the lower opening of that immenseslough whose character is not less remarkable than its name. This runsfor more than 30 m. alongside the river, clear through Pike Co., Ill., and intoAdams Co., forming a maze of channels which intersect one another and thuscut off various islands, besides opening into the Mississippi at several places;some of these lesser sloughs are called Spring Lake, Atlas, Cocklebur, Swift,Coon, Mud, Five Points, Crooked, Running, and Swan. This collateral water-coursealso receives a series of creeks, among which are those called Big or BigStew, Six Mile, Honey or Hadley, Ashton or Fall, and Harkness. This wholeaffair is commonly called the Snicarty or Sny Carte; it is Suycartee Slough onOwen’s map, and has other variants too numerous to recount. All these wordsor phrases are perversions of F. Chenal — ‰carté, lit. cut-off channel. For thisand the corresponding formation of the name Sniabar or Snibar, given to acreek and town in Missouri, see my note, N. Y. Nation, Jan. 19th, 1893, andLewis and Clark, ed. 1893, p. 29. The embankment built to defend theriver from the slough is known as the Sny levee.

[I-12] About 20 m., setting Pike in the vicinity of Cincinnati, Pike Co., Ill.;camp perhaps a little beyond this town, but just about opposite the boundarybetween Pike Co., Mo., and Ralls Co., Mo. On the Illinois side we have nothingworthy of note but the snaky Snicarty, back of which are the villages Atlasand Rockport. But the Missouri side offers some interesting things. On decampingfrom Krider’s isl., Pike passes in quick succession two creeks, Louisiana andSalt river, all on his left, all within 6 m. 1. Pike elsewhere cites both these creeks,and says the first of them is the one he calls Bar r.; this is now Buffalocr., falling in 2 m. below Louisiana; the bar at its mouth, whence the name,is present Buffalo isl. 2. The next creek is that immediately above, whosemouth is Louisiana; this is called Noir cr. on most of the maps before me, butBear cr. on the latest G. L. O. map; which name the natives prefer I am notinformed. 3. Louisiana is quite a town, which dates back to Nicollet’s time,at least, as he marks it on the beautiful map he made before 1840. The Chic.and Alton R. R. bridges the river at the mouth of Noir or Bear cr. Thiswas built 1872-73 (Act of Congr., Mar. 3d, 1871); the town or station Pike is onthe Illinois side, opp. Louisiana. The C. B. and Q. R. R. sends a branchhere; the St. L., Keok. and N. W. R. R. also runs through Louisiana. 4.Next is Salt r., which Pike elsewhere calls Oahahah, and others Auhaha, 2 m.above Louisiana. This seems to have been known long before the time Pike’sremark would suggest; if I mistake not, it is laid down on some maps before1700. It is a large river; the French were along here in 1680-90, and Ican put my finger on an old F. Rivière au Sel. Salt r., with its branches, isbig enough to water five or six modern counties, before it falls in through PikeCo. Present islands in Pike’s course of to-day, from Salt r. upward, areAngle, South, and North Fritz between Hickory chute and Scott’s ldg., Atlas,Blackbird, and Denmark, between a couple of Snicarty openings and Mundy’sldg. or Ashburn sta.; then the very large Gilbert’s isl., 2½ m. long, which liesbetween Gilbert’s and Tompkins’ ldg. on the Missouri side, and Cincinnati ldg.on the other. A good deal of engineering work was done at this bad place toclose Gilbert’s chute and throw the main channel over against the Illinois side.

[I-13] Cincinnati Landing, Pike Co., Ill., to Hannibal, Marion Co., Mo., 12 m.direct, and not much more by river, as its course is quite straight. The Frenchman’shouse, 4 m. beyond which Pike went to camp, was a germ of Hannibal,sown under the handsome hill, just above a little run which Nicollet and Owenboth map as Bear cr., opposite Hurricane isl. This place is mapped by Pikeas Hurricane Settlement; he speaks of it again under date of Apr. 26th, 1806.It is now a notable railroad center; the Wabash R. R. built the bridge in 1871(Act of Congr., July 25th, 1866). On the Illinois side there was a place calledDouglasville, which seems to have been a forerunner of the town or stationShepherd; while Hannibal itself has also the St. L., Keok. and N. W. R. R.skirting the Miss. r., the Hann. and St. Jo., the St. L. and Hann., andthe Mo., Kas. and Tex. To reach this then French embryo, Pikeproceeded with present Pike Co., Ill., on his right the whole way, but withRalls Co. on his left, to past Saverton in the latter county, and so on toMarion Co., Mo. He passed the positions of the islands now called Taylor’s,Cottel’s, King’s, and Glasscock’s; and after he had interviewed the Frenchman hewent on past the present position of the mouth of Bayou St. Charles, off whichare Turtle, Glaucus, and other islands, to camp in Marion Co., Mo., aboutwhere the present boundary between Pike and Adams cos., Ill., strikes theriver — that is to say, opposite Armstrong isl., near the beginning of the Snicarty.The St. Charles or Charles is old in history; I have seen the name ascribed toHennepin, 1680, but have not myself so found it. Pike’s Hurricane isl. isprobably not now determinable, if existent, unless he means a large tract ofbottom-land opposite Hannibal, isolated by the Snicarty. Glasscock’s isl. is nowor was lately the only well-founded island on the river near the mouth of Bearcr. It is said in Holcombe’s Hist. Marion Co., 1884, p. 902, that an islandopposite the mouth of Bear cr. disappeared in 1849. Judge Thos. W. Bacon,who came to Hannibal in 1847, informs me in lit. Mar. 21st, 1894, that heremembers no such island; "there was a sand-bar visible at low water justabove the mouth of Bear cr., and it disappeared long ago, but no suchfugitive formation could properly be termed an island. Along the N. front ofthe site of Hannibal was once an incipient island — a sand-bar with growingwillows extending from the N. end almost to the mainland. This graduallydisappeared except at the lower end, where it prolonged and merged into agranite gravel bed or bar visible at low water, which was dredged away by thegovernment." Pike is probably mistaken in using the name Hurricane inthe present connection. There were a Hurricane ldg., isl., and cr. lowerdown, in Lincoln Co.; but Judge Bacon informs me he never heard the nameapplied to Hannibal. Nor is it true that this town was ever called Stavely’sldg., except as a piece of fugitive sarcasm in the newspapers of a rival town,arising in the habit of one John W. Stavely, a saddler of Hannibal, who used tohaunt the landing when steamers arrived. It could not well have been firstknown as a "landing," because the first steamer to arrive there, the Gen.Putnam, Moses D. Bates, master, came in 1825, while Hannibal was platted in1819 by its present name, shortly after Pike Co. was organized (Dec. 14th, 1818).The classical term is said to be traceable to Antoine Soulard, surveyor-general,who is also said to have named Fabius r. for the great Roman cunctator. Butthis is dubious; old forms Fabas and Fabbas suggest Sp. fabas beans. Bay St.Charles was called Scipio r., as attested by the hamlet of Port Scipio at its mouth.

[I-14] This stretch of "39" m. needs to be warily discussed. The whole distancefrom Hannibal to Keokuk by the river channel is only 61 m. Pikemakes it from his camp of the 16th to that of the 19th 39 + 23 + 4 = 76 m.;he also started from a little above Hannibal on the 17th, and did not quitemake Keokuk on the 19th; for he only got to the foot of the Des Moines rapidsafter breakfast on the 20th. The whole way would have been about 80 ofhis miles against say 60 of actual travel, or the proportion of 4:3, as alreadynoted, p. 2; and we may confidently set him down on the 17th halfwaybetween Hannibal and Keokuk. Now from Hannibal to La Grange is 30m. and from La Grange to Keokuk is 31 m.; La Grange, Lewis Co., Mo.,at the mouth of Wyaconda r., is the required location of camp of the 17th.This is 10 m. above Quincy, the seat of Adams Co., Ill., one of the best knowncities on the river, though not as old as some of them. The C. B. and Q.R. R. bridged the river just above the city in 1867-68; a West Quincy grew upon the Missouri side, and the present importance of the place requires no comment.A very short distance above Quincy Pike passes from Marion intoLewis Co., Mo. But the most important point of this day’s voyage is oneto which the above text does not even allude. Pike elsewhere speaks of acertain Jaustioni river, as the then boundary between the U. S. and the Sacnation, 7 m. above the Frenchman’s house at Hurricane Settlement, on theW. side; and he traces this river on his map by the name Jauflione. Nowthere are five large streams which enter the Miss. r. on the W. within 3 m. ofone another, by four separate mouths, in Marion Co., say 2 to 5 miles belowW. Quincy, and the proportionate distance above Hannibal. They arenow known as (1) South Two Rivers; (2) North Two Rivers; (3) a branchof the latter — these three emptying practically together, just below Fabiusisl.; (4) South Fabius; and (5) North Fabius rivers, which fall intoa slough whose two mouths are opposite Orton’s isl. Pike has left usno data to decide which of these he means by Jaustioni or Jauflione,especially as the positions of the several outlets have no doubt changedsince 1805. They are all at present, or were very recently, considerablymore than the "seven" miles above Hannibal, being entirely beyond theBayou St. Charles, itself about 7 m. long. Pike’s queer names, Justionior Jaustioni, and Jauflione (latter in early text, 1807, p. 4, and on map), arefound also as Jeffreon, and usually as Jeffrion. Some form of the name, themeaning of which I have never learned, endured for many years; thus Jauflioner. appears in Morse’s Univ. Gaz., 3d ed. 1821, p. 350, though it had mostlydisappeared from ordinary maps of about that date. The river thus designatedhas a history which will bear looking up. Judge Thos. H. Bacon of Hannibalrefers me to certain documents bearing on French Colonial history tobe found in Amer. State Papers, VI. 1860, pp. 713-14, and 830-34, alsorepub. in Holcombe’s Hist. Marion Co., 1884. On p. 834 is: "July 10th, 1810.Board met. Present John B. C. Lucas, Clement B. Penrose, and FrederickBates, Commissioners. Charles Gratiot, assignee of Mathurin Bouvet, claiming84 arpents of land front on the Mississippi river and in depth from the riverback to the hills in the district of St. Charles.... The Board order that thisclaim be surveyed, provided that it be not situated above the mouth of theRiver Jeffrion conformably to the possession of Mathurin Bouvet," etc. AsBouvet’s claim was ultimately confirmed to Gratiot, Jeffrion r. must have beenabove Salt r. The next considerable river above Salt r. is that one of the"Two Rivers" called South r.; but this is hardly 30 m. long, and an Act ofDec. 31st, 1813, describes Jeffrion r. as over 30 m. long. The next one is NorthTwo Rivers; undoubtedly it is this one which was known as the Jeffrion inTerritorial days. When the region was first settled it was called the TwoRivers country, and the title of a certain Two Rivers Baptist Association preservesthis designation. The Governor of Louisiana Territory was requiredto divide it into districts (Act of Congr., Mar. 26th, 1804, sec. 13); Holcombe’sHist. Marion Co., p. 37, says that Governor Wm. Clark by proclamation reorganizedthe districts into counties Oct. 1st, 1812; and doubtless the Jeffrionwould be there again in mention. Bouvet’s settlement on Bay Charles isunquestionable in location; it was described as about 34 leagues above St.Louis, and was a place with which the commissioners must have been officiallyacquainted. In history B. Charles is nearly a century older than St. Louis, andit was for many years a better known locality. Present North r. is the onlyone that answers the historical and geographical requirements of the north oneof Two Rivers of early Territorial times and of the Jeffrion r. of FrenchColonial days. Holcombe, p. 148, gives an account of Kentucky prospectorson the Jeffrion in 1817. The name of the Sac chief Black Hawk occurs in connectionwith an incident on Two Rivers in 1812. But the most satisfactoryand in fact a conclusive identification of North Two Rivers with the Jauflione isderivable from the terms of our treaty with the Sacs and Foxes of 1804. Thiswill be found in Statutes at Large, VII. p. 84, seq.: A Treaty between theUnited States of America and the United Tribes of Sac and Fox Indians,made Nov. 3d, 1804, ratified Jan. 25th, 1805, and proclaimed Feb. 21st, 1805.Among the "articles of a treaty made at St. Louis in the district of Louisianabetween William Henry Harrison, governor of the Indiana territory and of thedistrict of Louisiana [etc., etc.] of the one part, and the chiefs and head menof the united Sac and Fox tribes of the other part," there is one defining theboundary thus: "Article 2. The general boundary or line between thelands of the United States and of the said Indian tribes shall be as follows, towit: Beginning at a point on the Missouri river opposite to the mouth of theGasconade river; thence in a direct course so as to strike the river Jeffreon at thedistance of thirty miles from its mouth, and down the said Jeffreon to the Mississippi,"etc., etc. In company with Mr. Robert F. Thompson of the Bureauof Indian Affairs at Washington I made a special examination of maps in hisoffice with reference to this point, and among them found one, prepared foroffice use in determining boundaries indicated in the terms of Indian treaties, onwhich the boundary in mention had been drawn from the Missouri opposite themouth of the Gasconade directly to a point supposed to be 30 m. up theNorth Two Rivers, which I had on other grounds determined the Jauflioneor Jeffreon to be. This river empties in Fabius township, in the N. W. ¼ ofSect. 3, T. 58 N., R. 5 W., Marion Co., Mo.

On this extraordinary cession see a note by L. C. D[raper] in Minn. Hist.Coll., III. Part 2, p. 143, 1874.

At the upper end of St. Charles bayou, called Bayou chute, a couple ofmiles below Two Rivers, was the site of a place that rejoiced on paper in thename of Marion City. They started a railroad there, were liable to wash-outs,and inspired Charles Dickens’ idea of his quizzical "Eden." If one would liketo see how uncounted "cities" were laid out in gaudy prints — some consisting ina hovel or two, some without even that — let him look over Featherstonhaugh’sdiverting relations of the ’30’s, when he traveled in these parts, then overrunwith a set of the neediest, greediest, and most unscrupulous landsharks thatever lived on calomel, whisky, and the gullibility of their fellows. Marion Cityis located on one of the maps before me, but not on any of the others. Alittle above it are Fabius and Orton isls., already mentioned, and oppositethese is Ward’s isl., larger than either of the other two. A couple of milesabove Quincy begins the group of Cottonwood isls., opposite a large horseshoe-shapedslough which seems to be an old cut-off of the river; it is connectedwith the Fabius r. outlets, and receives Durgan’s (i. e., Durkee’s) cr. AtQuincy is the lower outlet of a very extensive snicarty, 12 or 15 m. direct,and much more by its sinuosities; this begins at Canton (above La Grange) andconnects at various points with Canton chute, itself some 10 m. long. LaGrange, where Pike camps, was so called from the hill under which it nestled,and the English of which would be Barn hill. The original settlement wasnamed Wyaconda or Waconda, from the river at whose mouth it was made;thus Nicollet’s map marks Wiyakonda instead of La Grange, preserving theIndian name of the place. This river is a large one which, with its branches,traverses Scotland and Clark cos. before entering Lewis Co. Before settlementa certain tract of country below La Grange had been called Waconda prairie,or in some similar form of the Indian word, as Wacondaw of Maj. Thos.Forsyth, 1819; and this is what Pike’s map presents as the "Small Prairie."

[I-15] About two-thirds of the way from La Grange to Keokuk — say to Foxprairie, at the mouth of Fox r., site of Gregory’s Landing, Clark Co., Mo.The principal place passed is Canton, Lewis Co., Mo., 7 m. above La Grange,opposite the head of Canton chute. Some other places that were started, such asSatterfield, would be hard to find on a latter-day map. Tully is now practicallya part of Canton; Tully isl. exists, 3 or 4 m. above Canton, and Satterfield’screek is a branch of Fox r. Near there, one Dodd kept for some years awoodyard on the Illinois side, and the steamboat channel among the sand-barsand islands in his vicinity acquired the name of Dodd’s crossing.

[I-16] About 10 m., from Gregory’s ldg. to "the point of a beach" within thepresent city limits of Keokuk, Lee Co., Ia., immediately above the mouthof Des Moines r., which for some distance separates the States of Missouriand Iowa; opposite is Hancock Co., Ill. The place where Pike got sawyeredwas very likely between Hackley’s and Fox isls. The place is a bad one;there has been a good deal of engineering work done in damming Hackley’schute, and jettying the channel over to the other side. Fox r. (once calledR. Puante, whence also Stinking cr.) is not mentioned by Pike in the presentconnection; but he speaks of it elsewhere, and lays it down on his map withoutname, marking an Indian village on the Illinois side between its mouth andthat of Des Moines r. The present or a very recent arrangement of its dischargeis by Fox slough, a small snicarty that begins at Alexandria and runs 5m. down to Gregory’s ldg. This cuts off a piece of bottom which the railroadtraverses between the points said, besides Fox and several lesser islands.

[I-17] For the origin of this name, involving a spurious etymology by associationwith Trappist monks, see Lewis and Clark, ed. 1893, p. 20. The always carefuland accurate Nicollet made the matter quite plain: see his Rep. 1843,p. 22. Some form of the old Indian name is used by the earliest Frenchtravelers in these parts. One of the oldest maps I have seen, dressée par J. B.Franquelin dans 1688 pour être presentée à Louis XIV., letters R. des Moingana,and marks the Indian village of Moingoana. One of Joliet’s maps hasMoeng8ena. Joliet and Marquette passed its mouth going down the Miss. r. in1673, on or about June 25th; Accault, Auguelle, and Hennepin passed it goingup the Miss. r. early in 1680. Besides the many early variants of the phrasewhich settled into Des Moines, we find R. of the Outontantas, 8tantas, 8t8ntes,Otentas, etc., R. of the Peouareas, Paotes, etc., R. of the Maskoutens, etc.,Nadouessioux, etc. This is the largest river Pike has come to since he left theIllinois, and the only tributary of the Missouri which he charts with any detail;he lays it down with 20 of its branches, and marks the positions on it of oldForts Crawford and St. Louis. We observe that he calls it De Moyen; andthis gives occasion for a blunder not less amusing than to call it Trappist r.would be. For our hero was ambitious of French scholarship, and on consultinghis dictionary to find out about moyen, he set the stream down as Meansr. in his French-English vocabulary of geographical names. Another author,or his printer, got it Demon r. Beltrami, 1828, renders Le Moine andMonk r. Pike’s editor of the early text, 1807, has des Moines, p. 4. Thestream is a large and very important one, too much so to be entered upon ina mere note like this; but I may observe that it is historically less significantthan those of similar extent on the Illinois and Wisconsin side of the Mississippi,because several of the latter were highways during the seventeenthand eighteenth centuries. The mouth of the Des Moines became of coursethe scene of early settlement, but not all the places started there survived.Nicollet’s map shows three — Keokuck, Montebello, Warsaw. Owen’s, somewhatlater, has also Nassau and Churchville, immediately at the debouchure,where there came to be also a Buenavista. Publishing in 1847, but havingwritten of 1835, the always entertaining Featherstonhaugh speaks of "a sorrysettlement on the left bank, called Keokuk, after a celebrated Sauk chief,inhabited altogether by a set of desperados" — a diagnosis which will no doubtbe better relished by the Hamiltonians, Varsovians, and Alexandrians than by thepresent polished Keokukites. He should have made one exception, however,for he found there the famous George Catlin, Nov. 4th, 1835: see his book, II.p. 42. Besides Keokuk, Lee Co., Ia., at the foot of the rapids above themouth of the Des Moines, the three places which have grown into urban realityare: Hamilton, Hancock Co., Ill., directly opposite Keokuk; Warsaw, HancockCo., Ill., 2 m. below the mouth, and directly opposite this, Alexandria,Clark Co., Mo. Three States as well as three counties thus met here. Pikecontinues with Illinois on his right, but now has Iowa instead of Missouri onhis left.

Fort Edwards was a position of importance for some years. This militarypost was built on the east side of the Mississippi, 3 m. below the foot of therapids, and directly opposite the two islands which divided the outlet of theDes Moines into three channels. Half a mile S. W. from the fort was CantonmentDavis, its precursor, abandoned when the works were completed. Thelocality is practically Warsaw. A full description of this establishment, as itwas at the time of Long’s visit in August, 1817, is given in his report, asprinted in Minn. Hist. Col., II. Part 1, 1860; 2d ed. 1890, pp. 77-80. Ithad been building since June, 1816, and was not quite finished in 1817.

[I-18] Some light — at least that light in which he was regarded — is thrown onMr. Ewing by a letter before me from General James Wilkinson to GeneralHenry Dearborn, Secretary at War, dated St. Louis, Dec. 3d, 1805: "In aformer letter you have asked me who this Ewing was — I can give you nofurther Information than that I found Him in a place, which He is utterlyunqualified to fill — He is I understand placed at the River Desmoin, to teachthe Indians the Arts of Agriculture, but has I believe given but a wretchedexample — This is I think the Third visit he has made since my arrival to thisplace, and I expect his disbursements which are supplied by Mr. Chouteau mayexceed expectation — He appears to be a young man of innocence, levity &simplicity — without experience or observation."

[I-19] The rapids named from their situation above the mouth of Des Moines r.have also been known as the Lower rapids, in distinction from those higherup about the mouth of Rock r. These formidable obstacles to navigationhave been overcome by modern engineering skill, but Pike’s curt notice of thechannel is clearly recognizable. The river was bridged by the Wabash roadbetween Hamilton and Keokuk, in 1869-70 (Act of Congr., July 25th, 1866); thetown lock and chain are within a mile or so of the bridge. Then succeed theEnglish, Lamalee, and Spanish chains, and the Upper chain at the head of therapids. The distance is about 11 m. Sandusky, Ia., was located betweenthe English and Lamalee chains; Nashville, Ia., at the Spanish chain; Solferino,Ia., above the last; at or near one of these last two is Galland, Ia.; andon the Illinois side is a place called Sonora. On that side Cheney cr. falls in atHamilton, and higher up are two others, known as Golden’s and Quarry Sugar,but which used to be called Wagoner’s and Larry’s; while on the Iowan sidePrice’s cr. falls in at the middle lock, Lamalee’s at Sandusky, and severalsmaller ones at various points. The railroad and canal hug the Iowan side. Atthe head of the rapids the river makes a sharp bend; in the concavity of thisbend stands Nauvoo, Ill., originally a Mormon settlement; it used to be calledalso Commerce. This is the place where Mr. Ewing had his establishmentwhen he entertained Pike; the latter charts it as "U. S. Agricultural Estabt."The Sac village opposite was on the site of the present town of Montrose, Ia.A large creek runs through this town. There are some islands at the headof the rapids, between Nauvoo and Montrose, one of which, No. 401 of theMiss. Surv. chart, is called Montrose. At the head of the bend, still opp. Nauvoo,is the lower end of Dobson’s slough, which receives a stream charted byNicollet and Owen as Sugar cr., but later dedicated to his Satanic majestyby the name of Devil’s or Big Devil cr., called by Beltrami Manitou cr. Devil’sisl. is the name of the large tract, nearly 4 m. long, which is isolated by Dobson’sslough, certain sections of which latter are known as Big River and Potter’s.

[I-20] James Wilkinson: see elsewhere for this letter, which formed Doc. No. 1,App. to Pt. 1. of the orig. ed. of this work. Pike’s 5 or 6 m. takes himpast Dobson’s slough and Devil’s or Sugar cr. and isl., and the sand-bar onwhich he camped is now represented by Niota isl., 2½ m. long, or one ofthe small ones close by. The locality is the well-known one of the city ofMadison, or Fort Madison, seat of Lee Co., Ia. Opposite this city, in HancockCo., Ill., are two little places, one called Niota, and the other Appannose (Nicollet),Appanoose (G. L. O. map), Appanooce (Miss. Surv. chart), etc. A certaincreek which falls in by Niota and is known as Tyson’s cr. seems to be thenever-identified one which Lewis and Clark mapped in 1814 as Sand Bank cr.

A history of Lee Co., pub. Chicago, 1879, says that the city of Fort Madisonwas so called from the old fort and trading-post of that name. The authorspeaks of the tradition that this establishment was built by Zachary Taylor,when this distinguished general, afterward president of the United States, wasa lieutenant in the army; and attempts to refute this tradition by an appeal tothe War Department for the facts in the case. But unluckily, the informationhe derived from this source was erroneous; for the Hon. Geo. W. McCrary, thensecretary of war, told him that the adjutant-general of the army reported tohim (McCrary) that Fort Madison was erected by Pike in 1805. Whereas,besides imperishable renown, Pike erected nothing in 1805 but his stockade onSwan r., and various patriotic flag-poles. The difference between selecting orrecommending a site for a fort, and building one on that site, is obvious at sight.But Pike did not even select or recommend this spot for a fort, the lowest oneof several which he did pick out being at Burlington: see next note. Z. Taylorwas a 1st lieut. of the 7th Infantry in 1808, appointed from Ky.; whichfact, as far as it goes, supports the tradition. The Andreas Hist. Atl. of Ia. hasit that the fort for which the town was named was built in 1808; evacuated andburned by hostile Indians, 1813 (qu. 1812 — ). On Monday, Aug. 4th, 1817, whenLong visited the ruins of Fort Madison, there was nothing left but some oldchimneys, a covert way leading from the main garrison to some sort of anelevated outwork in the rear, and a number of fruit-trees on the ground whichhad been a garden: see Minn. Hist. Soc. II., Part 1, 1860, 2d ed. 1890, p. 75.In the fall of 1832 one Peter Williams settled on the present site of the town.The old trading-house there was called Le Moine factory. The old fort stoodclose to the river, and as I judge within a third of a mile of the present Statepenitentiary.

[I-21] About 18 m., to a position above the mouth of Skunk r., a littlebelow the Burlington bluffs; he calls it 5¼ m. to the locality he presentlydescribes with particularity, and which will be recognized as the site of Burlington,seat of Des Moines Co., Ia. After passing Madison on his left, withNiota and Appanoose on his right, he goes up by Pontoosuc and Dallas, bothin Hancock Co., Ill., and then has Henderson Co., Ill., on his right. Furtherup, on the left, Lee Co. is separated from Des Moines Co., Ia., by Skunk r.This is a large stream, whose present pleasant name translates the Indianword rendered Shikagua by Nicollet, and Shokauk by Featherstonhaugh;Lewis and Clark map it as Polecat r. Beltrami, 1828, calls it Polecat r.and River of the Bête Puante. Green Bay is a small place in Lee Co., ona sort of slough which discharges into the river behind Lead isl., and whichis called Green bay. This is connected in some way, which for me remainsoccult, with a creek called by Nicollet Lost cr.; it is a part of the intricate watersbetween Skunk r. and that stream which runs through Madison past theState penitentiary, where the bridge that was built in 1887-88 strikes the Iowaside. Jollyville was a place on the same waters, but seems to have been lostlike the creek. Some of the islands besides Lead, the present positions ofwhich Pike passed, if not these islands themselves, are now known as Dutchman,Hog, Polk, Thompson, Peel, and Twin, the latter at the mouth of Skunk r.His camp I suppose to have been about on the spot where one Sauerweinused to keep his woodyard, about halfway between Twin isls. and themouth of Spruce (or Spring) cr. This is nearly opp. the middle of the greatisland now called Burlington, formerly Big, being 7 m. long, separated fromthe Illinois mainland by Shokokon slough, on which there is or was a placecalled by this latter name. A number of creeks make into this slough, amongthem those called Dug Out, Honey (Camp cr. of Nicollet and Owen), andEllison’s. A place called Montreal started near Ellison’s cr., but does not seemto have survived. What Pike maps as "Sand bank Creek," at a place hecalls "Sand Bay," seems to be Dug Out cr., or the next one below, which fallsinto the slough behind Thompson’s isl., near Dallas City.

[I-22] This is the prairie through which meanders Henderson r., 6 m. above Burlington.The Sac village was on its north bank. The prairie and the villageare lettered on the map as per text; the river is shown there, without name;the Burlington bluffs are delineated, marked "Positions for a Fort." Thepresent city was built across the mouth of Hawkeye cr., a rivulet which makesin above the steepest part of the bluff, where the Flint hills recede a littlefrom the river; it extends to the larger Flint cr. or r., at whose mouth itmay be said to be situated. Across the Mississippi is East Burlington, Ill., atthe head of Shokokon slough; the bridge which the C., B. and Q. R. R. built in1867-68 spans the river and connects the two places. There are numerousislands above Burlington, the principal of which are O’Connell’s, Rush, andOtter. Above Henderson r. there is nothing of special note till we reachOquawka, seat of Henderson Co., Ill., reckoned 13 m. by the channel aboveBurlington. Pike omits his customary mileages to-day, but did not get beyondOquawka, which is at the head of the prairie on which he camped; for herebegin some steep banks, known before and since Pike’s day as the Yellow banks.He marks them on his map, and they are mentioned by the same name in Forsyth’snarrative of 1819.

[I-23] We are not told which side of the river this was, and the sentence is otherwiseambiguous, as all streams hereabouts are branches of the river. We knowhe means a bayou or slough, by following which he expected soon to regain theMississippi ahead of his boats, and I suppose that Huron slough, on the Iowaside, led him astray. The slough itself is not long, merely cutting off Huronand some smaller islands for four miles; but this receives Iowa slough, whichmeanders toward the river, and so would take Pike and Bradley away from theriver if they followed it up. This supposition is strengthened by Pike’s usingthe word "savannah," which with him means rather marsh or bog than prairie,and he would hardly have applied it to the better ground on the Illinois sideif he had gone there and been misled by Henderson r. Moreover, he continuesto camp on the west side, as he would naturally do after loss of the twomen who went to find his dogs; and also he expected to recover the men at theplace above where the hills first come down to the river, which is at Muscatine,Ia. He does not say who these men were; they were not recovered tillSept. 1st, at Dubuque.

[I-24] This mileage is excessive, as are all those hence to Rock Island or Davenport,the distance of which by the channel is 70 m. from Oquawka, thoughPike makes it 92. Moreover, the distance from Oquawka to New Boston,directly opposite the mouth of the Iowa r., is only 18 m., and Pikeremains below the Iowa r. to-day. What with sloughing it, losing his dogs,and waiting for his men, he did not get much beyond Keithsburg, Mercer Co.,Ill., which we may safely take as to-day’s datum-point. This is built under abank at the mouth of Pope’s cr., and so far answers the requirements ofPike’s camp opposite it. The situation is in Louisa Co., Ia., but a little distanceover the boundary of Des Moines Co. Excepting Keithsburg, no notablepoint is passed to-day. A place called Huron was started on the slough of thatname, but it never came to anything. Huron isl. is called Thieves’ isl. on somemaps. The large one (No. 355) opp. Keithsburg, and crossed by the railroad,is separated from the Iowan side by Black Hawk slough.

[I-25] Pike delineates "Sand Bank" on his map directly opposite the mouthof Iowa r. This is the site of New Boston, Mercer Co., Ill. The bankcomes immediately upon the river with a frontage of 2 m., and Edwards r.falls in at the foot of the bank, 3½ m. above Pope’s r. At New Bostonthe Mississippi turns sharply, so that the mouth of Iowa r. is rather on theS. than W.; and the bank on which is the town recedes northward, leaving lowground between itself and the Mississippi, watered by the ramifications of Sturgeonbay, Illinois slough, Swan lake, etc. This is what Pike means by his"Sand-bank prairie on the E. side." As to that "marked Grant’s prairie," Ishould observe that no such name appears on the map as published; Pike referredto his immense original draft in water-colors, now preserved in the WarDepartment, and from which the small printed map was reduced with the omissionof too many details. What he means by Grant’s prairie is the lowlands onthe Iowa side before you come to Muscatine, which is the point where the hillsfirst reach the river-side. Compare Apr. 26th, 1806. Grant’s prairie is nowknown as Muscatine isl., being virtually cut off by Muscatine slough, whoselower mouth is hardly 2 m. above the Iowa r., though the upper entrance is atMuscatine — a distance of some 18-20 m. At one point this slough dilates intoa body of water which is now called Keokuk lake, but which was charted byNicollet as "L. Maskuding or in the Prairie." Here are obviously the origin andmeaning of the name "Muscatine." The town now so called was once knownas Bloomington. I suspect that "Grant’s" prairie in Pike may be intended forGrande prairie; thus Beltrami calls it Grande Prairie Mascotin, II. p. 196,and Forsyth has Grand Mascoutin. There was a place started by the name ofPort Louisa on the Iowan side of the river, near one of the openings of Muscatineslough; but it seems to have disappeared after bequeathing the name tothe county, whose seat is now Wapello. As to Pike’s "28" miles to-day, thatis best disposed of by observing that to-morrow he drags his boat "nine miles,to where the river Hills join the Mississippi," i. e., to Muscatine. So hecamps on the Iowan side, a certain distance below Muscatine. We shall notbe far out if we set him exactly on the boundary between Louisa andMuscatine cos., opp. the lower end of Blanchard’s isl., behind the middle ofwhich Copperas or Copper cr. falls in on the Illinois side.

The great Iowa r. should not be passed without remark. For the name inits extreme fluidity, see Lewis and Clark, ed. 1893, p. 20. Some still moresingular forms of the word than those there noted reach us from the time whenthe French writers and cartographers used the figure 8 for the letters ou; so that"Iowa" was liable to appear as Ay8ay (Ayouay), or in some such form: Neillcites forms sing. and pl. as Aye8ias, Ayo8ois, Ayooues, Ayavois, Ayoois,Ayouez, Ayoes, Aaiaoua, to which I can add Aiavvi; another series of wordsflows from the introduction of J or j: thus Pike, early text, 1807, p. 5, has Jowa,and I have noticed also Ajoe, Jaway, Joway, Jowah, etc. Beltrami, 1828, hasYawoha, Yahowa, and Yawowa. This river-system waters a great portion ofthe State, on courses S., S. E., and E. Pike says elsewhere that in ascendingit 36 m. you come to a fork, the right-hand branch of which is called RedCedar r. Waiving any question of distance, this is correct; and moreover,Red Cedar is the larger of the two forks, though by a very unusual freak ofnomenclature the united stream Iowa takes the name of the lesser fork. Hefurther says that Red Cedar r. branches out 300 m. from its mouth; whichtriple forking is "called the Turkey’s foot." This term seems to have lapsed;the situation is in Black Hawk Co., above Cedar Falls, and one of the turkey’stoes is called Shell Rock r. The notable town of Cedar Rapids is lowerdown, in Linn Co. The confluence of Iowa r. proper with Red Cedar is atFredonia, Louisa Co.; Pike’s map represents this by the pitchfork-shaped object,though it is not lettered with any name. He marks a village of Iowas "about10 miles up," on the "right" bank, i. e., on the right-hand side going up, leftbank. Iowa r. presents the anomaly of a great river with nothing to speakof at its mouth (New Boston is across the Mississippi). "Iowa City" seemsnever to have got much beyond its original wood-pile, and a similar "city"which Nicollet charts by the name of Black Hawk would be hard to find now.There is, however, a little place called Toolsboro, under the hill on the leftbank, 2 m. above the mouth of the Iowa.

[I-26] Pirogues: see L. and C., ed. 1893, p. 4. Pike uses this form consistently.The most amusing variant of the word I have noticed occurs in Shea’s Hennepin’sDescr. Louisiana, Eng. tr., 1880, p. 156, where we read, "a number ofparrakeets and about eighty cabins full of Indians," and an editorial note informsus that "the French printer put peroquets, but Margry’s Relation givesthe real word, ’pirogues,’ ’canoes.’"

[I-27] The distance between Muscatine and Rock Island is 28 or 29 m. by thechannel. As Pike has 6 or 8 m. to go before reaching Muscatine, makes"28½" to-day, and "22" to-morrow, we can confidently set him down to-nighthalfway between these two places — say vicinity of Montpelier, Muscatine Co.,Ia., 4 or 5 m. below Buffalo, Ia., and Andalusia, Ill. There is no speciallynotable point in this whole stretch, after Muscatine is passed; the most of aplace is Fairport, Ia., 3 m. above Tahma or Sweetland cr. Several places thatwere started seem to have died young, if they were not stillborn; we find onolder maps such as Geneva, somewhere between Muscatine and Fairport on theIowa side, and Wyoming, apparently in the same position as Fairport now is.Between Muscatine and Fairport the river is or was recently divided into Druryslough, Wyoming slough, and Hersey chute betwixt these. Pine cr. falls in onthe Iowan side, 2½ m. above Fairport. Opposite Fairport the long Andalusia Slough opens, running down on the Illinois side all the way from Andalusia, adistance of 9 m. Pike’s camp was probably on the Iowan side (still in MuscatineCo.); across the river he has Rock Island Co., Ill.

[I-28] Actually about 16 m., to one of the most definite locations of the voyagethus far, in the heart of the present city of Davenport, seat of Scott Co., Ia., anddirectly opposite Rock Island, seat of Rock Island Co., Ill. Soon after passingpresent site of Montpelier, Pike went from Muscatine into Scott Co., Ia. Nextare the two towns directly opposite each other, of Buffalo, Ia., and Andalusia,Ill.; the former is marked N. Buffalo on Nicollet’s map; the other is calledRockport on Owen’s map, or Rockport was then where Andalusia is now.Linwood, Ia., is a small place 2 m. above Buffalo; and 3 m. above this was thesite of Rockingham, Ia. This last was started directly opposite the mouth ofRock r., but never flourished. In fact there is probably no place on theMississippi where more mushroom towns have been projected on paper byunscrupulous speculators than about the mouth of Rock r.; and we observethat they mostly had resounding names, well known in other parts of the world.A certain Stephensonville is marked on Nicollet’s map, apparently in the presentposition of the city of Rock Island. In the mouth of Rock r. is a triangularisland, dividing the two outlets, and opposite this is Credit isl. (No. 312),1½ m. long. Pike’s camp in Davenport was probably about opposite the lowerpoint of Rock isl., 2½ m. long; this is No. 307 of the Engineers’ chart, andits lower end was utilized for the bridge built in 1869-72 by the C., R. I. andP. R. R. (Act of Congr., July 26th, 1868).

La Rivière de Roche, or à la Roche, of the French, which Pike and otherscall Stoney or Stony and Rocky or Rock r., and which is now known by thelatter name, is the second largest in Illinois. It arises in Wisconsin, in theregion S. of Lake Winnebago, leaves that State at Beloit, and holds a generalS. W. course through Illinois to the Mississippi. It used to be called Kickapoor. — a name traceable to R. des Kicapous of Franquelin’s map, 1688. Pikegives its source as near Green bay of L. Michigan, and ascribes a length of 450m., 300 of them navigable. His map letters "The largest Sac Vill." on itsS. side near the mouth, about the present position of Milan, and delineates theextensive rapids of the Miss. r., above its mouth, which the text of the 28thdescribes. Rock r. afforded one of the five or six principal waterways betweenthe Great Lakes and the Miss. r., the connection being made above the Horiconmarshes by portage from the small stream which falls into L. Winnebago atFond du Lac. But this way was less eligible than the Fox-Wisconsin route.

[I-29] See Lewis and Clark, ed. 1893, pp. 1202, 1203, 1211. James Aird and hisbrother George were among the Sioux traders at the mouth of the Minnesota orSt. Pierre r. in 1803 and thereafter; others similarly engaged then and therewere Archibald Campbell, Duncan Graham, and Francis M. Dease.

[I-30] Davenport, Ia., to Le Claire, Ia., 16 m. by water; Rock Island, Ill., toPort Byron, Ill., 17 m.; actual extent of the rapids somewhat less than either ofthese distances. The chains, in ascending series, are called Lower, Moline,Duck Creek, Winnebago, Campbell’s, St. Louis, Crab Island, Sycamore, Smith’s,Upper. The principal islands are: Rock, No. 307, 2½ m. long, with the littleones called Papoose (No. 308), Benham’s, and Sylvan, alongside; Campbell’s,opp. Watertown, Ill.; Spencer’s, opp. Hampton, Ill., on the Iowan side; andFulton’s. A number of creeks make in on both sides; among them are Duck,Crow, and Spencer’s, on the Iowan side, and the one on the Illinois side whichfalls in by Watertown, name unknown to me. The rapids were formerlyguarded by Fort Armstrong, occupying an eligible site on the extreme lower endof Rock isl. A good account of this post, as it was in 1817, is found inLong’s Expedition of that year, printed in 1860 and reprinted in 1890, in Part Iof II. of the Minn. Hist. Coll., pp. 67-73. The places on the Illinois side are:Moline, 3½ m. above Rock Island; Watertown, 5 m. above Moline; Hampton,1 m. above Moline; Rapids City, 4½ m. above Hampton; Port Byron, 1m. further; land distances less than by river-channel. On the Iowan side,between Davenport and Le Claire, are places called Gilberttown or Gilbert, opp.Moline, and Valley City or Pleasant Valley, opp. Hampton. Pike does not saywhere he camped at the head of the rapids; but it was no doubt at Le Claire,as the channel ran on the Iowan side.

[I-31] This Fox Indian village is located on Pike’s map, but without name. Itwas on the Iowan side, above the rapids — not at Le Claire, but somewhatfurther up, at or near present town of Princeton, Scott Co., Ia. Forsyth in1819 speaks of "the Little Fox village, 9 miles above the rapids." A mileabove Princeton, on the Illinois side, is Cordova, marked Cordawa on Owen’smap, and Berlin on Nicollet’s.

[I-32] At 4 m. above Cordova, Pike passed on the left or Iowan side a river whosename is perhaps the most remarkable thing about it: Wabisapencun, Pike’smap; Wabisipinekan, Pike’s text, further on; Wabisapincun, Lewis andClark’s map of 1814; Wapisipinacon, Long’s; Wabezipinikan, Nicollet’s;Wabesapinica, Featherstonhaugh’s; Wapsipinicon, Owen’s and U. S. Eng’rs’;Wapsipinecon, G. L. O. No two original authors agree, and when onetries to copy another he is liable to be foiled by his printer. But the riverruns on just the same, through several Iowan counties, on a general S. E.course, approximately parallel in most of its extent with Red Cedar r. Italso does duty as the boundary between Scott and Clinton cos., Ia., alongmost of their apposed extent. There are several islands about its mouth; one ofthem is called Adams. Opposite the mouth of the W — — n r., for a spaceof about 8 m. along the Illinois side of the Mississippi, the hills recede, leavinga low place in which the body of water known as Marais d’Osier, or LakeWillowmarsh, is situated: see Pike’s map, in the interval between his "HighPrairie" (ending at Cordova) and his "Rocky Hills" (beginning about Albany).Beltrami, II. 196, calls this Marais d’Ogé, and says it was "inhabited bya savage of the same name"! Beltrami’s bosom friend, Major Long, has a stillmore startling rendition of the phrase, as Mer a Doge, in Minn. Hist. Coll.,II. Part 1, 1860, 2d ed. 1890, p. 67. It appears as Mare de Oge on anIllinois atlas before me. From Le Claire to Albany is 18 m.; Pike probablydid not get quite so far as this, but for convenience of keeping tally we willassume that he did, and set him on the lower point of the great Beaver isl.(No. 291), at the mouth of Comanche slough, directly opposite Albany,Whiteside Co., Ill.; nearest place on the other side is Comanche or Camanche,Clinton Co., Ia. Beaver isl. is 3 m. long, and extends up to Clinton, thecounty seat.

[I-33] The distance by river-channel from Albany to Dubuque is reckoned 72 m.Pike’s figures are 43 + 31½ + 25 = 99½ m. The required reduction of mileage isabout one-fourth off; applying which to the "43" m. of the 30th, we find Pikesomewhere in the vicinity of Apple r., and may most conveniently set him atits mouth. Decamping on the 30th, he first made the stretch of Beaver isl.,past Cedar and Cat-tail crs., right, and came to Clinton. The original name ofthis city, or of its site, was New York; both these terms seem to point back tothe time when Governor Dewitt C. Clinton was popular. The river wasspanned here by the bridge built by the C. and N. W. R. R. in 1864-65, utilizingisland No. 290. Two or three miles above stand, facing each other, Lyons,Clinton Co., Ia., and Fulton, Whiteside Co., Ill.; around the other side of thehill N. of Fulton, Otter cr. falls in. The line of hills on the Iowan side comesto the river a mile above Lyons, but at once recedes again, leaving along theriver-side what is called the Pomme de Terre, Potato, or Ground Apple prairie,at the head of which Elk r. or cr. falls in, 8 m. above Lyons. The recessionof the hills on the Illinois side from Fulton is much greater for a space of 16 m.,where there is low ground for some miles back from the river, sloughy thewhole way near the river, and thus making various islands, the largest of whichare called Fulton and Savanna. Near the head of Fulton isl. is a little placenamed Thompson, in Carroll Co., Ill. The line of Whiteside and Carrollcos. strikes the river about halfway between Fulton (town) and Thompson.On the Iowan side, the line of Clinton and Jackson cos. is between Elk r.and Sabula. The latter town, or its site, used to be called Charleston. Itnaturally grew after 1881, when the C., M. and St. P. R. R. built the bridgehere, under Act of Congr., Apr. 1st, 1872. The site of Sabula is called Prairiedu Frappeur, Beltrami, II. p. 196, where it is said to have been "inhabited bya savage of that name." Before crossing the river, the track ran for a coupleof miles on Savanna isl., at the head of which Plum r. falls in; and immediatelyabove this point is Savanna, Carroll Co., Ill., 2½ m. from Sabula. The highground comes close to the river at Savanna, but on the Iowan side there is sloughybottom for 4 m. above Sabula, all this lowland being known as Keller’s isl.;above this, higher ground comes to the river-side at Keller’s bar. Rush or BigRush cr. falls in on the Illinois side 5 m. above Savanna, and 2 m. further isthe mouth of La Pomme or Apple r., nearly up to the boundary betweenCarroll and Jo Daviess cos., Ill. One Arnold used to have his landing a milebelow Apple r., about where we suppose Pike to have camped.

[I-34] Whatever the exact distance represented by this mileage, we have to setthe Expedition down in a very unhealthy place to-night, as will presently appear.Soon after decamping from Apple r., — that is, in 5 miles’ distance by thechannel, Pike passes on his left a notable stream, which he elsewhere calls theGreat Macoketh. This is Makokety r. of Nicollet, Maquoketa r. of others,whose name is now usually spelled Makoqueta. This is also the designation ofthe county seat of Jackson, situated upon the river. It falls in opposite Sandprairie, about where the line between Carroll and Jo Daviess cos. strikes theriver. The "beautiful eminence on the W." which Pike observed is Leopoldhill, near Bellevue, Jackson Co., Ia. This town existed before Nicollet’s mapwas made, as he marks it by name. The locality called Chéniere by BeltramiII. 196, was hereabouts. He gives it on the W., 10 m. above his R. la Pomme.The hills begin to approach the river four or five miles below Bellevue, and socontinue with little interruption to Dubuque. The trough of the river issimilar on the Illinois side, but the hills do not hug the river so closely, leavinga stretch of sloughy bottom, especially at the delta of the Galena r. Thisis the insalubrious place of encampment. The Galena was long named, and isstill sometimes called, Fever r. The same slough by which it dischargesreceives Smallpox cr.; and on the Iowan side, opposite Harris slough, whichis the upper end of the Fever delta, a creek falls in known as Tête du Mort, orTête des Morts. It must have been a choice region of saturnine and miasmaticpoisons, as the victims of lead-palsy and ague-cake who lived onFever r. had the option of moving down on Smallpox cr. or over to Death’s-headcr. The place to avoid is pointed out to Mississippian tourists by PilotKnob, an isolated eminence on the prairie near the variolous creek, 3 m. S. ofthe city of Galena, which is about the same distance up the febrile stream. Thecranial creek is said to have been so named on account of the number of skullswhich resulted from an Indian fight there. On this point Beltrami, 1828, II.p. 160, has "a place called the Death’s-heads; a field of battle where the Foxesdefeated the Kikassias [Kaskaskias — ], whose heads they fixed upon poles astrophies of their victory. We stopped at the entrance of the river la Fièvre,a name in perfect conformity with the effect of the bad air which prevailsthere." Nor do I know what terrors may be hidden under the name ofSinsinawa cr., which makes in a mile or two higher up, on the Illinois side.Two of the sloughs at the delta are called respectively Harris’ and Spratt’s;a third is Stone slough. One Gordon established a ferry here, many years ago,and a place on the Iowan side, close to the boundary between Jackson andDubuque cos., is still known as Gordon’s ferry. Regarding the nomenclatureof Galena r., we should not omit to cite here Keating’s Long’s Exp. of1823, published 1824, I. p. 212, where it is stated that Smallpox cr. andFever r. are the same: "a small stream, called by the Indians MekabeaSepe, or Small-pox river; it is the Riviere de la Fievre, which is said to enterthe Mississippi opposite to Dubuque’s mines." Probably not much weightattaches to this observation, which Major Long only made parenthetically, andevidently at second-hand information, in speaking of a badger which his partyhad killed and cooked; though it is also quite possible that Galena r. oncerejoiced in both names, one of which was later conferred upon the small creekwhich enters its delta. That Long knew the Galena as La Fièvre r. is certain,for he uses the latter name, though without any accent, in the narrative ofhis voyage of 1817, in speaking of reaching it on Monday, July 28th, of thatyear. See Minn. Hist. Coll., II. Part 1, 1860; 2d ed. 1890, p. 66. It appearsthat Long’s MS. of his voyage of 1817 was placed in Prof. Keating’s hands whenthe latter was preparing for publication the history of Long’s Expedition of1823. This source of information was freely drawn upon; in fact, I do notsee that Prof. Keating did not fully avail himself of this opportunity to editoriallyembody in the narrative of 1823 the whole substance of the 1817 materials,in so far as Major Long went over the same ground in the two expeditions.But the earlier narrative contains considerable matter not pertinent to the laterone, inasmuch as Major Long in 1817 traversed a long section of the Mississippithat he did not retrace in 1823. On this particular account, as well as for moregeneral reasons, it was desirable and eminently fitting that Long’s Expeditionof 1817 should be published; and that was first done in long after-years by myfriend, the late Rev. Edw. D. Neill, the veteran Minnesota historian, who receivedthe MS. for this purpose from Dr. Edwin James, then of Burlington, Ia.(who d. Oct. 28th, 1861). As originally published under Dr. Neill’s carefuleditorship, the article was entitled: "Voyage in a Six-Oared Skiff to the Fallsof Saint Anthony in 1817. By Major Stephen H. Long, TopographicalEngineer United States Army," and formed Part 1 of Vol. II. of the Minn.Hist. Coll., 1860 (about 80 pages); 2d ed. 1890, half-title and introductorynote by E. D. N., one leaf; journal, pp. 9-83; map and appendix, preparedby A. J. Hill, pp. 84-88. Major Long’s movements of 1817 occupied76 days, of which the journal here printed covers the period from July 9th toAug. 15th, both inclusive, or 38 days; as it picks up Major Long after his returnto Prairie du Chien from a tour of the Fox-Wisconsin portage, takes him fromthat Prairie to the falls, and returns him to Bellefontaine, near the mouth of theMissouri. The objects of this voyage were to meander the upper Mississippi andtake its topography, with special reference to the selection of military sites. Itwas performed in a boat furnished by Governor William Clark, Superintendentof Indian Affairs at St. Louis. Its most important single result was the speedyoccupation of the mouth of St. Peter’s r. for a military post, at first calledFort St. Anthony, and in 1824 named Fort Snelling; but the narrative isreplete with matter of permanent historical and scientific interest. Major Longwas a conscientious, competent, and well-equipped explorer, as all three of hisimportant and memorable expeditions attest. The present expedition is theonly one of which we have the account from his own pen, as Dr. James andProf. Keating, respectively, were the authors of the other two. Stephen HarrimanLong, of New Hampshire, was appointed from that State a second lieutenantof Engineers Dec. 12th, 1814, and brevetted major of Topographical EngineersApr. 29th, 1816, though his actual majority in that corps was not reachedtill July 7th, 1838. He became colonel Sept. 9th, 1861, was retired June 1st,1863, and died at Alton, Ill., Sept. 4th, 1864.

[I-35] This Dubuque matter formed a part of Doc. No. 2 of App. to Part 1 of theorig. ed., p. 5, and will be found beyond: see Chap. v. Art. 3. The documentwas transmitted to General Wilkinson by Pike from Prairie du Chien.

[I-36] Chippewas, or Ojibways — of whom Pike has much to say in this volume.The French nickname he uses, found also as Saulteurs, Saulteux, Saltiaux,Sautiers, Saltiers, Soutors, Soters, etc., was not given because these Indianswere better jumpers than any others, but because the band of Chippewas whomit originally designated lived about the Sault de Sainte Marie, or St. Mary’sfalls, of Lake Superior. The term afterward became synonymous withChippewas or Ojibways in a broad sense. On the map of Champlain’s Voy.,Paris, 1632, the Sault is marked du Gaston, for the brother of Louis XIII., andthere located between Mer Douce and Grand Lac, i. e., between LakesHuron and Superior. The chute seems to have been first heard of about1616-18, from one — ‰tienne Bruslé, or Stephen Broolay. In 1669, when theJesuits reached the place, they changed the name to compliment the B. V. M.There is no doubt that Ojibwa or Ojibway is preferable to Chippewa or Chippeway,as a name of the tribe; but the latter is best established, both in officialhistory and in geography, and may be most conveniently retained. These arethe same word, etymologically, and are mere samples of the extraordinary profusionof forms in which the name exists. Very likely 50 different combinationsof letters could be produced, some of them bearing little resemblance to oneanother. The meaning of the name is in chronic dispute. The linguisticsages seem to be agreed that the word has something to do with puckering;but whether it refers to the place which is puckered up between the two lakesabove said, or to the way the moccasins of these Indians were puckered alonga peculiar seam, or to the habits of these Indians of torturing with fire till theskins of their prisoners were puckered by burning to a crisp, are questions muchagitated. The learned Anglojibway, Hon. W. W. Warren, historian of histribe, takes the latter view, saying: "The word is composed of o-jib, ’puckerup,’ and ub-way, ’to roast,’ and it means, ’to roast till puckered up.’" Mr.Warren adduces also the name Abboinug, literally Roasters, given by the Ojibwaysto the Sioux, from the same horrid practice. He says that the Ojibways,as a distinct tribe or people, denominate themselves Awishinaubay. Probablythe best account we possess of these Indians is that given in the Minn. Hist.Coll., V. of which is almost entirely devoted to the subject (pp. 1-510, 1885).This consists of Warren’s history, based on traditions, and of Neill’s, basedon documents. The two thus admirably complement each other, and are precededby a memoir of Warren, by J. Fletcher Williams.

[I-37] Our name of these Siouan Indians comes from their Algonkin appellation,which reached us through an assortment of French forms like Ouinipigou(as Vimont, Relation, 1640), etc., several of which have served as the originalsof place-names now fixed in current usage. The term Puants, meaning Stinkers,was the French nickname. It is found as Puans, Pauns, Pawns, Paunts, etc.,originated very early, and was much in vogue. On the old map cited in the foregoingnote appears the legend "La Nation des Puans," though these Indians,with their Green bay, are marked on it N. instead of S. of Lakes Superiorand Huron. The Stinkards gave occasion for a Latin synonym, as seen in thephrase "Magnus Lacus Algonquiniorum seu Lacus F — tentium" of De Creux’smap, Hist. Canada, Paris, 1664. They were also called Gens de Mer, Sea People.Jean Nicolet of Cherbourg in France, in the service of Champlain’s HundredAssociates, believed to have been the first white man to enter Green bay, inJuly, 1634, calls them by their own name of themselves, which he rendersOchunkgraw, and which later acquired a variety of forms: see note44, p. 39,and Butterfield’s Disc. N. W., 1881, passim, esp. p. 38.

[I-38] Pike did not get far from Dubuque, if he left at 4 p. m. He probablystopped at the first convenient place to camp above the bluff, in the vicinity ofLittle Makoqueta r. — perhaps on the spot where Sinipi, Sinipee, or Sinopewas started. In bringing him up to Dubuque from the Galena delta we havenot much to note: Suisinawa, Sinsinawa, or Sinsinniwa r., right; Menomoneecr., right, and Catfish cr., left, between which is Nine Mile isl.; Massey,Ia., town at Dodge’s branch; East Dubuque, Ill., rather below the large city ofDubuque. This is the oldest establishment in Iowa, as the Canadian FrenchmanJulien Dubuque came there in 1788; extinction of Indian title and permanentsettlement not till 1833; town incorporated 1837; city charter, 1840; pop.3,100 in 1850: for the rest, see any gazetteer or cyclopedia. With this day’sjourney Pike finishes Illinois, which has been on his right all the way, and takesWisconsin on that side; but Iowa continues on his left. The interstate lineruns on the parallel of 42° 30´ N., which cuts through Dubuque.

[I-39] From Dubuque to Cassville is only 30 m., and Pike was somewhat advancedbeyond Dubuque when he started. "The mouth of Turkey river,"opp. which he camped, is of course a fixed point; and this shows the requiredreduction of his "40" miles to somewhat under 30. Determinations like thesewould be proof, were any needed, of the proposition advanced at the start, thatthe set of mileages with which we have to deal require a discount of 20 to 25per cent. as a rule. In making his "two short reaches," Pike passed his LittleMacoketh, the Little Makoqueta r., on his left, and the extensive slough onhis right which receives the discharges of Platte and Grant rivers. He mapsthe former river: see the unnamed stream on the left, where "Mr. DubuquesHoufe" and "Lead Mines" are lettered. The other two rivers are not laiddown; they run in Grant Co., Wis. Beltrami, II. 196, has a locality on theW. said to be 16 m. above Dubuque’s mines, and to be called Prairie Macotche,"from the name of a savage who inhabited it." This item is no doubt imaginary;but Macotche is clearly the same word as Makoqueta. Pike’s "long reach"is the 15 m. or more where the river is straight; it begins about Specht’s Ferry(opp. which the Potosi canal was dug for an outlet of Grant r.) and extendsto Turkey r. On the left, about halfway along this stretch, is the town ofWaupeton (Wahpeton, Warpeton, etc.), at or near which the boundary betweenDubuque and Clayton cos. strikes the Mississippi; the town of Buenavista, ClaytonCo., Ia., is 3½ m. higher, between Plum and Panther crs. On the right asnicarty 11 m. long connects Grant r. with Jack Oak slough, at the head of whichCassville is situated, at the mouth of Furnace cr., and obliquely opposite themouth of Turkey r. Some places which started along the river have failed, orchanged their names; I do not now find Osceola, which maps mark near themouth of Platte r.; nor Lafayette, which started about the present site of Potosi,and is now marked by some dilapidated chimneys you will observe when theC., B. and Q. train stops at a sort of station there; nor Frenchtown and Finlay,both on the Iowan side, the latter at the mouth of a creek called Bastard on amap of 1857; nor Frankford, at or near Buenavista; nor Winchester, aboutthe mouth of Turkey r. Whether by accident or design, Grant r. is lettered"Le Grand R." on Nicollet’s map. The Fox village, whose women and childrenwere so frightened at the sight of the Americans, is marked by Pike onthe N. side of Turkey r., near its mouth, about where Winchester seems tohave stood. Present Turkey R. Junction of the C., M. and St. P. R. R. is onthe other side. This stream is "Turkies" r. of Beltrami, II. p. 196.

[I-40] Probably 19 m., Cassville to Clayton, Ia., whence he could go comfortablyfor breakfast to Wyalusing, Wis., or still nearer the Wisconsin r. Above themouth of Turkey r. the Miss. r. is divided into two courses, called the Casvilleslough on the Wisconsin side and the Guttenberg channel on the Iowanside. The latter is the broadest course, but the former is, or was some yearsago, the main channel. The two come together 10 m. above Cassville, anda mile or two above Glen Haven, Wis. Guttenberg, Ia., is 8 m. above Cassville,at the mouth of Miners, Miner’s, or Miners’ cr.; it seems to have beenformerly called Prairie La Port, as marked on Nicollet’s map. Buck or Backcr. falls in a mile above. Approaching Clayton the banks are high and abrupton the Iowan side, but on the other the hills recede, leaving a sloughy bottominto which several creeks empty, one of them Sandy cr., which comes by asort of sand-bank. In this vicinity there was a place called Cincinnati, Wis.,which seems to have disappeared, like another called Kilroy, on the Iowanside. Owen’s map marks Killroy, a Clayton Co. map of 1857 has Keleroy, andNicollet lays down the sizable creek near which it appears to have been situated,now known as the Sny Magill. The distance from Clayton to Wyalusing is3 m.; thence it is about the same to the Wisconsin r.

[I-41] R. des Ouisconsins on Hennepin’s map, 1683, and thus near the modernform, though in the plural for the Indians and with ou for the letter w that theF. alphabet lacks; in Hennepin’s text, passim, Ouscousin, Oviscousin, Onisconsin,Misconsin, etc., according to typesetter’s fancy; Ouisconsing, Misconsing,etc., in La Salle, and there also Meschetz Odeba; Miscou, Joliet on oneof his maps, Miskonsing on another; Ouisconching, Perrot; Ouisconsinc,Lahontan’s map; Ouisconsing, Franquelin’s map, 1688; Ouisconsin, Carver;variable in Pike; Owisconsin and Owisconsing in Beltrami; Wisconsan, consistently,in Long; Wisconsin in Nicollet, and most writers since his time.Were it not for La Salle’s appearance on the Illinois r. in 1680, and his sendingHennepin down it to the Mississippi, when he dispatched Michael Accaultand Antoine Auguelle from Fort Crêvec — ur to trade with the Chaas, the Wisconsinwould rank first in historical significance as a waterway to the Mississippifrom the Great Lakes; and such priority of date is offset in favor of the Wisconsinas the best and most traveled route from the lakes to points below the Falls ofSt. Anthony. It was already an Indian highway when it was first known to thewhites, and did not cease to be such when the paddle was exchanged for thepaddlewheel. A pretty full account of the Fox-Wisconsin route will be renderedbeyond in this work. There are accounts of white settlements, or at least trading-posts,at Prairie du Chien about 1755; but white men may have lived in thisvicinity, if not upon the spot, long before that, for Franquelin’s map of 1688locates a certain Fort St. Nicolas in what appears to be the position of P.du Chien, as well as I can judge. Moreover, Joliet and Marquette reachedthe Mississippi r. by way of the Fox-Wisconsin, June 15th or 17th, 1673. Ourmost definite information, however, dates from Oct. 15th, 1766, when Carvercame to the spot. He reached it by the Fox-Wisconsin route, went up theMississippi as high as the river St. Francis, wintered 1766-67 up the St. Peter,returned to P. du C. in the summer of 1767, went up the Mississippi again tothe Chippewa r., and by that river back to the Great Lakes in July, 1767. Hecalled the place Prairie le Chien; at the time of his visit it was "a large towncontaining about 300 families," with houses well built after the Indian fashion,and a great trade center for all the country roundabout. Carver also called theplace Dog Plains. This is plain as a transl. of the F., and nobody doubts whatPrairie du Chien denotes; what it connotes, however, or its actual implication,is another question which has been much mooted. Pike states elsewhere inthis work that the place — which, by the way, he seldom if ever calls Prairiedu Chien, but de Chein, des Cheins, etc. — was named for Indians who livedhere, known as Reynards, etc., and would translate this F. nickname either Fox,Wolf, or Dog; in one place he has Dog’s Plain. But Wolf or Dog does notseem to have been the name used for this tribe, which, when they were not calledOttagamies (or by some form of that word) were either the Reynards of theFrench or the Foxes of the English and Americans. Beltrami, II., p. 170, hasthat "it takes its name from an Indian family whom the first Frenchmen met there,called Kigigad or Dog." The whole weight of evidence is on the side of a personalname in the singular number. Long states that P. du C. was named afteran Indian who lived there and was called the Dog. This may bear on Pike’sstatement, and the latter may be explicable upon the understanding that it refersto certain Indians, not necessarily of the Reynard tribe, who were called DogIndians, i. e., The Dog’s Indians. Nicollet marks the Indian town by theChippewa name, Kipy Saging; Schoolcraft renders this Tipisagi, with referenceto the treaty of Prairie du Chien. At the time of Long’s 1823 visit the villagehad about 20 dwelling-houses besides the stores, most of them old and somedecaying; the pop. was about 150. He located the place as in lat. 43° 3´ 31´´ N.,long. 90° 52´ 30´´ W.; magn. var. 8° 48´ 52´´ E. Long speaks of one Mr. Brisbois,who had long resided there; of Mr. Rolette of the Am. Fur Co.; and ofAugustin Roque, a half-breed and whole-fraud, to whom we shall refer again.Fort Crawford began to be built July 3d, 1816, by the troops under the commandof Lieutenant-Colonel William S. Hamilton of North Carolina, who hadattained that rank in the 3d Rifles Feb. 21st, 1814, and who resigned from thearmy March 8th, 1817; it would hold four or five companies, but was a meanestablishment, poorly built on a bad site, too near Rousseau channel and theKipy Saging slough. Long relates that in 1822 the fort as well as the villagewas inundated, so that the water stood three or four feet deep on the paradeground and ran into the officers’ quarters and the barracks, forcing the garrisonto camp for a month on higher ground. One of the blockhouses of the fort wasbuilt on a mound which was large enough to have supported the whole establishment,though only the stockade ran up to it. Through the attentions ofWm. Hancock Clark of Detroit, Mich., I am in possession of a water-colorpicture of the fort, roughly but tellingly done by his illustrious grandfather,William Clark, who with Governor Lewis Cass effected the important treaty ofP. du C., Aug. 19th, 1825. This measures 18 — — 15 inches, and shows a part ofthe stockade straggling up to that one of the blockhouses which was on the hillor mound, as described by Long. The general effect upon the beholder is tosuggest something of a cross between a penitentiary and a stockyard, but unsafefor criminals and too small for cattle. The remains are extant, and may beobserved about 40 rods W. of the railroad track, half a mile S. of the station ofthe C., B. and Q. This Fort Crawford must not be confounded with the earlierone of the same name, built in 1812 or sooner, at the N. end of the town, closeto Rousseau channel. This site was near the positions of the two early Frenchsettlements, as distinguished from the later one that grew up S. of the site ofthe second Fort Crawford. Our actual settlement, continued on as the Prairiedu Chien of to-day, only dates from 1835 or thereabouts, after the cessation ofIndian hostilities in that quarter; the town is now the seat of Crawford Co.,Wis. It is in the very S. W. corner of the county, which is separated fromGrant Co. by the Wisconsin r. The bridge across the Mississippi to N.McGregor was built in 1873-74 and altered in 1888; C., M. and St. P. R. R.;Act of Congr. legalizing, June 6th, 1874. Notwithstanding its prominent situation,its distinguished history, and its comparative antiquity, Prairie du Chienhas never amounted to much, and probably never will. There is nothing thematter with the place — the trouble is with the people. The place to-day cuts alesser figure than it did in Pike’s time, when it was our extreme frontier post inthat direction, and it continued to be such until Fort St. Anthony (Snelling)was built. A part of the difficulty is ecclesiastical; no priest-ridden communitycan expect to keep up with the times. Prairie du Chien is an antique curio,comparing with the rest of Wisconsin very much as Quebec does with Ontario — andfor similar reasons.

[I-42] The bluff W. bank of the Miss. r., opp. P. du C., was later called Pike’smountain; which, says Long’s MSS. of 1817, No. I, fol. 37, as cited by Keating,1824, received its name from having been recommended by the late GeneralPike, in his journal, "as a position well calculated for the construction of amilitary post to command the Mississippi." But this recommendation is nowheremade in Pike’s journal: it is made in a letter which Pike wrote to GeneralWilkinson from P. du C., this date of Sept. 5th, as the above text says,and which formed in the orig. ed. Doc. No. 2 of the App. to Part I — the samethat covered the Dubuque report. The particular hill that Pike picked out doesnot differ from the general range of bluffs which extend on that side of the riverfor several miles, all of about the same elevation. But to be particular, it wasthat hill which stands between McGregor and N. McGregor. The original settlementof McGregor was called in the first instance McGregor’s landing. Thiswas 1½ mile below N. McGregor, built at the mouth of the creek that comesdown by Pike’s mountain. This stream used to be known as Giard or Gayardr. (latter on Pike’s map), and these were common spellings of the name of aperson otherwise known as Gaillard, of mixed French-Indian blood, said tohave been, with Antaya and Dubuque, one of the three first white settlers atPrairie du Chien, and by Long to have died suddenly during the latter’s expeditionup the Wisconsin r. The present name of the creek is Bloody Run,which may easily have acquired if it did not deserve the designation in some oneor more of the uncounted fierce collisions of this blood-brued region. But tradition,if not authentic history, ascribes the origin of the sanguinary title to theNimrodic exploits of the celebrated Captain Martin Scott, a mighty hunter whoused to kill so much game in that vicinity that he was said to have made thisstream literally run with blood. But so much used to be told about CaptainScott — on whom was fathered in those parts the story of the coon which promisedto come down if he would not shoot, elsewhere connected with the nameof Davy Crockett — that the legends concerning him may pass for what theymay be worth. The mouth of this creek is 3 m. below that of Yellow r., andthe boundary between Clayton and Allamakee cos. strikes the Mississippibetween the two, though very near the mouth of the latter.

[I-43] See note anteà, p. 5, where the phrase Cap au Grès is mentioned. Pike’sterm Petit Gris, elsewhere Petit Grey, would be preferably rendered Petit Capau Grès, in the peculiar system of phonetics which our Parisian friends are wontto enjoy. This Little Sandstone bluff extends up the Wisconsin in the directionof Bridgeport. A small creek which comes down a break in the bluff, andempties into the N. side of the Wisconsin a mile above its mouth, is also namedPetit Gris or Grès. There was also a Grand Grès in that vicinity — to judgefrom a creek I find on some maps by the name of Grandgris — perhaps thebranch of the Wisconsin now known as Kickapoo r. Pike’s recommendationof the Petit Grès as a military site was never acted upon.

[I-44] I think Pike never once hits what a grammarian would consider the properway to write this phrase. Wherever he happens upon it, the gender or thenumber gets awry. The hitch in pluralizing seems to be because the first s issounded before the initial vowel of the next word, but the last s is silent, becausethe French seldom articulate their letters at par. Folle avoine, literally"fool oat" — a phrase also reflected in the Latin term avena fatua — is theCanadian French name of the plant known to botanists as Zizania aquatica,and to us common folks as wild rice, wild oats, water-rice, water-oats, Indian orCanadian rice or oats, etc. My friend Prof. Lester F. Ward, whom I desiredto prepare the botanical definitions for the Century Dictionary, and who didwrite them, with the assistance of Mr. F. H. Knowlton, after the lamenteddeath of Prof. Sereno Watson, Prof. Asa Gray’s successor at Cambridge, definesZizania as "a genus of grasses, of the tribe Oryzeæ. It is characterizedby numerous narrow unisexual spikelets in a long, loose androgynous panicle,each spikelet having two glumes and six stamens or two more or less connatestyles." This would be news to the Menominees, though these Indians subsistedso largely upon the seeds of the plant that the French called them lesFolles Avoines, and the English knew them as the Rice-eaters. This ricegrows in profusion in all the lacustrine regions of the N. W., and is regularlyharvested by all the Indians of that country, to be sold or bartered as well aseaten by them. Its great size, its purplish spike-like heads when ripe, and itsomnipresence, render it one of the most conspicuous products of the region.The Indians do not cut the stalk as we reap our cereals, because the loose grainsfall so readily that the easiest way to gather them is to simply shake or beat theminto a canoe. As to the polyglot council which Pike held with the Puants, wemay hope without believing that the Winnebagoes were deeply impressed by thecombination of New Jersey and Canadian French which fell upon their earsthrough the Dakotan tongue. It is true that the Winnebagoes come of Siouanstock, and so have some linguistic affinity with the Sioux; but the dialect theyacquired is conceded by all philologists to be peculiar to themselves, and peculiarlydifficult to utter. The Winnebago spoken at this council was probably asdifferent from the Dakotan as Latin is from its cognate Greek, or even as Pike’sFrench was from that spoken in Montreal or Paris. The Winnebagoes callthemselves by a name which is rendered Otchagra by Long, Howchungera byFeatherstonhaugh, Hotcañgara by Powell; also Ochungarand, Hohchunhgrah,and in various other ways which authors prefer and printing-offices permit:see note37, p. 31. Since Charlevoix they have been known as Puans, Puants,or Stinkers — and they deserve to be. Their vernacular is noted for the predominanceof the growler or dog-letter r, litera canina of the Latin grammarians.

[I-45] Billon’s Ann. St. Louis, 1804-21, pub. 1888, p. 382, is obviously in errorin stating that Pierre Rousseau embarked with Pike at St. Louis; for here wehave him first hired at P. du C. I know nothing further of the man; but heis doubtless the one from whom Rousseau channel of the Miss. r., which runspast P. du C. on the Wis. side, as distinguished from the main steamboat channelpast McGregor on the Iowan side, derived its name.

[I-46] Joseph Reinville or Renville was the name of two persons, father and son,former French-Canadian, latter half-breed by a Sioux squaw of the village ofPetit Corbeau or Little Raven (Kaposia). Long extolls him for ability andfidelity as an interpreter, remarking that he had met with few men that appeared"to be gifted with a more inquiring and discerning mind, or with more forceand penetration," Keating, Exp. of 1823, I. p. 312. Reinville naturally acquiredgreat influence over the Indians, and when the British decided to usesuch allies in the war of 1812-14, he was selected by Colonel Robert Dicksonas the man who could be most relied upon to command the Sioux. In his militarycapacity he received the rank, pay, and emoluments of a captain in theBritish army, and distinguished himself as well by humanity as by gallantry inwar. After this he entered the service of the H. B. Co.; left it, relinquishingalso his British pension, and returned to his old trading-post near the sources ofRed r., where he established the successful Columbia Fur Co. Reinville hadthat energy and independence which enabled him to decide for himself and actupon his decisions; he therefore made bitter enemies as well as warm friends,whose judgments of his character and conduct were, of course, as diverse astheir feelings for or against him. Reinville was born at Kaposia, near St. Paul,about 1779, and died in March, 1846: see sketch of his life by Rev. E. D.Neill in Minn. Hist. Soc. Coll., I., 2d ed. 1872, pp. 196-206.

[I-47] This Frazer I do not doubt was a relative of the Robert Frazer, Frazier,Fraser, etc., who accompanied Lewis and Clark. The latter was a "GreenMountain boy," and it is highly improbable that two unrelated Frazers camefrom Vermont to the Western frontiers in the beginning of this century.But I can only conjecture what their degree of kinship was. OneJoseph Jack Frazer cut a figure in early Minnesota history, if we may judgefrom the sketches of his life and adventures which ran through the columns ofthe St. Paul Pioneer, about 1866 or 1867, from the pen of General Henry HastingsSibley. In this connection I may be permitted to note the fact, not generallyknown, that Robert Frazer was one of several annalists of that famousexpedition, who went so far as to issue a MS. prospectus of a book he was goingto publish about it, with Captain Lewis’ own sanction. But this project failedfor lack of subscribers to what any publisher would now be glad to accept,could the MSS. be found. See Prof. James D. Butler’s review of my L. andC., N. Y. Nation, Oct. 26th and Nov. 2d, 1893.

[I-48] Pike’s was luckier than Long’s boat-party of 1823, which started from P.du C. as Pike did, but did not get much above Yellow r. It consisted ofThomas Say, the subsequently distinguished naturalist; Prof. W. H. Keating;Mr. Samuel Seymour, the artist; the rascally interpreter Roque or Rocque; andLieutenant Martin Scott, the latter in command of a corporal and his squad ofeight soldiers. These men tapped a keg of liquor, and got too drunk to navigate — thecrew did, I mean, for it is well known that officers never drink. Yellowr. is present name of the stream consistently so called since it ceased to beR. Jaune of the French régime; it has been already mentioned as falling in onthe W., 3 m. above Bloody Run and N. McGregor. Three miles higher, onthe same side, is Paint cr., or Painted Rock cr., near a place full of historic interest;for at one point along the almost unbroken bluffs is the steep escarpmentwhich became known to the F. as Roche Peinte, or Rochers Peints, and whichcontinues to be called Painted Rock or Rocks, from the Indian pictographs withwhich it was adorned for ages. Beltrami gives it as Pointed Rock, II. p. 196.High places of all sorts, whether the elevation be phallic or terrene, havealways been regarded as great medicine by the untutored, from the days of thepriests of Baal, Moloch, or Jahveh, to those of the similar shamans and marvel-mongersof Lo. Such theological jugglery is reflected in the presentname of Waucon or Waukon Junction, near the mouth of Paint cr., where theChic., Dub. and Minn. R. R., meandering the river, sends the Waukon branchto Waukon, seat of Allamakee Co., Ia. A town, or something that tried to beone, by the prosaic name of Johnsonsport, is to be found on some maps at themouth of Paint cr. About 4 m. above Waukon Junction is a place calledHarper’s Ferry, suggestive of Virginian emigration. The bluffs hug the Iowanbank closely to Paint cr. The opposite side is low for some miles back,with sloughs or bayous known as Marais, Courtois, Sioux, etc., into which drainseveral creeks, among them one called Fisher’s — no doubt for the gentlemanwho entertained Pike — and another named Pickadee; both these are received inSioux bayou. But above Paint cr. the channel runs, or recently did run, onthe Wisconsin side, having an intricate snicarty on the other, whose variouscourses are known as Seaman’s slough, Big Suck-off, Gordon’s bay, Martell’slake, Center, Harper, St. Paul, Crooked, Ferry, etc., sloughs. Wherever thechannel was in Pike’s time, he says that he camped on the W. side, and I supposeat a point about opposite present town of Lynxville, Crawford Co., Wis.,which is reckoned 17 m. above P. du C. by comparatively recent hydrographers.To reach this place he passed Trout cr., which falls in on the right hand nearlyopp. Painted Rock, and the site of Viola, at the mouth of Buck cr., also on theright.

[I-49] Say Island No. 142, or head of No. 143, for a present location which exactlyfits, being on E. side, 4 or 5 m. below mouth of Upper Iowa r., andopp. De Soto, Wis., on the border of Crawford and Vernon cos. The campitself is of little consequence, in comparison with the notable points passedto reach it, at Pike’s Cape Garlic and in that vicinity. At the head of Harperand Crooked sloughs the channel runs under the Iowan bluffs to Lansing, AllamakeeCo., Ia., 12½ m. from Lynxville. On the Wisconsin side for the samedistance is a remarkably labyrinthic snicarty, whose principal run is called Winneshiekslough, upon which is Ferryville, Crawford Co., Wis., at or near themouth of Sugar cr. The series of creeks which fall into these sloughs is asfollows, in ascending order: Kettle, above Polander hollow; Copper, aboveCumming’s hollow; Buck (duplicating a name: see last note); the Sugar cr.just said; and Rush, above Ferryville. The river sweeps under the bold Iowanheadlands, two prominent points of which became known as Cape Garlic andCape Winnebago — one from the alliaceous plant growing there, and the otherfrom the incident about to be cited; while two of the four streams which fallin through four breaks on these bluffs were correspondingly called Garlic r. orCape Garlic cr., and Winnebago r. or Cape Winnebago cr. Authors differ asto which is which; I make the following determinations: 1. At the point wherethe main channel of the Mississippi divides into Crooked and Harper sloughs,8 m. below Lansing, and near where Heytman had his landing, a large creekfalls in. This is properly Garlic r. — the one on which the town of Capoli issituated. Capoli means Cape Garlic, being a perversion of the F. Cap à L’Ail — aphrase that has been peculiarly unlucky at the hands of compositors andengravers; even on Nicollet’s map it stands by accident Cap a´ Lail, though theeminent geographer himself was un Français de France, whose mother-tonguewas academic. Beltrami, II. p. 197, expands the phrase to Cape à l’Ail Sauvage.2. Three miles above the mouth of Capoli cr. a rivulet falls in between two eminences;the lower one of these is present Capoli bluff, formerly Cap Puant orCape Winnebago; the upper one is now called Atchafalaga bluff, formerly Capà l’Ail or Cape Garlic; the rivulet just said is Pike’s Garlic r. 3. At 4½m. higher, through a recess in the highlands falls in the stream now called Villagecr., which Nicollet maps as Cape Winnebago cr. This is the one onwhich the town of Village Creek is situated, 3 m. up. Its mouth is exactly amile below the mouth of Coon or Clear cr., on which Lansing is situated,under Mt. Hosmer — this "mountain" being that part of the bluffs which isisolated between the two creeks just said to fall in a mile apart. With thusmuch by way of geographical determinations, I must leave to someone morefamiliar than I am with the local traditions or actual history of the place, toidentify the exact scene of the following incident, given in Keating’s Long’s Exp.of 1823, pub. 1824, I. p. 266: "Two remarkable capes or points were observed onthe right bank of the Mississippi below Iowa river; the lower one is designatedby the name of Cape Puant, because at a time when the Sioux and Winnebagoes(Puants) were about to commence hostilities, a party of the latter set out on anexpedition to invade the territory of the Sioux and take them by surprise; butthese being informed of the design, collected a superior force and lay in ambushnear this place, expecting the arrival of their enemies. As soon as the Winnebagoeshad landed, the Sioux sallied from their hiding-places, pressed upon themas they lay collected in a small recess between the two capes, drove them intothe river, and massacred the whole party. Garlic cape, just above [italics mine]this, strikes the voyager by the singularity of its appearance. In shape it representsa cone cut by a vertical plane passing through its apex and base; its heightis about four hundred feet." I suppose the "small recess" of this recital to bethat between present Capoli (lower) and present Atchafalaga (upper) bluffs,respectively former Cape Winnebago (lower) and former Cape Garlic (upper)bluffs.

[I-50] La Feuille is a name which Pike rarely, and only by accident, spells correctly.But in writings of the period it was extremely variable, being foundeven as Lefei, Lefoi, Lefoy, La Fye, etc. This French term commonly appearsin English as The Leaf, sometimes Falling Leaf, and is conjecturally a translationof the native name of the hereditary chiefs of the Kioxa (Kiyuksa) band ofSioux. This has usually been rendered Wabasha or Wapasha, and explained asderived from wapa, leaf, and sha, red. In one place Long has Wauppaushaw.In Riggs and Pond’s Dakota dictionary the name is given as Wapahasha, andetymologized as from wapaha, a standard, and sha, red. In Minn. Hist. Coll.,I. 2d ed. 1872, p. 370, J. Fletcher Williams surmises the origination of thename in the chieftainship of the Warpekutes, otherwise Leaf Shooters — thoughwhy the tribe was so called, and whether the English term is a proper version ofthe aboriginal name, seem never to have been satisfactorily shown. Such formsof the chief’s name as Wabashaw and Wapashaw, etc., are common, besideswhich there are some odd and rare ones; e. g., Beltrami, II. p. 180, has:"The Great Wabiscihouwa, who is regarded as the Ulysses of the whole nation."Three chiefs named Wabasha are known to us in history. Wabasha I.was famous during the Revolutionary war. Wabasha II. was his son, and thelatter is the one of whom Pike, Long, Beltrami, and many others speak. Hewas already a great chief in Pike’s time, who grew in credit and renown withyears. He was seen in 1820 by General Henry Whiting, who describes him asa small man with a patch over one eye, who nevertheless impressed everyonewith respect, and whose profile was said to resemble that of the illustriousCondé. "While with us at Prairie du Chien," says Whiting, "he never moved,or was seen, without his pipe-bearer. His people treated him with reverence.Unlike all other speakers in council, he spoke sitting, considering, it was said,that he was called upon to stand only in the presence of his great father at Washington,or his representatives at St. Louis." He was not a warrior, believingthat Indians could prosper only at peace with one another and with the whites,and declared that he had never been at war with the latter, though many of hisyoung men, against his advice, had been led astray in the war of 1812. Hisson, Wabasha III., resided at the village below Lake Pepin until 1853, and in1872 was living on the Niobrara Reservation.

[I-51] To go up to the mouth of Upper Iowa r., for the conference with Leaf’sband of Sioux, who received the Expedition with almost touching warmth, asPike goes on to narrate. His map letters "Upper Iowa River," and marks"Sioux Vill." on the S. side near the mouth. Pike’s text of 1807, p. 7, hasJowa: Beltrami has Yahowa in text, Yawowa on map: for other forms seenote25, p. 22. The river is a large one which, with its tributaries, drains a N.E. portion of Iowa and some adjoining Minnesota land. The river dischargesby a set of sloughs in such intricate fashion that it is not easy to locate its principalmouth with entire precision, to say nothing of where it was at Pike’s visit;recent hydrographic surveys, on the scale of a mile to the inch, show the largestopening at a point exactly 2½ m. S. of the inter-State line between Iowa andMinnesota, which runs to the Mississippi on the parallel of 43° 30´ N., throughthe village of New Albin, on Winnebago cr., and cuts through Lost slough.Assuming this position, which is probably right within a fraction of a mile, Pikeis precisely opposite the place where was fought the decisive battle of Bad Axe,notable in history as finishing the second Black Hawk war. Black Hawk wasthe most celebrated chief during the Sac and Fox war, b. about 1768, at the Sacvill. near the mouth of Rock r. in Illinois, d. on the Des Moines, in Iowa, Oct.3d, 1838. In the campaign of 1832 the Indians were defeated on the Wisconsinr. July 21st, by Colonel Henry Dodge, and again Aug. 2d by General HenryAtkinson. Zach. Taylor had become colonel of the 1st Infantry Apr. 4th, 1832,and had his hdqrs. at Fort Crawford, P. du Chien. He moved his forces underGeneral Atkinson, and caught the Indians opposite the mouth of Upper Iowa r.,as they were preparing to cross the Mississippi; the battle of Bad Axe was fought,the hostiles were defeated, and their organization was broken up. ColonelTaylor returned to P. du Chien with the troops he commanded, and soon afterwardreceived the formal surrender of the Sac chieftain, whose sagacity was asgreat as his courage. Black Hawk was sent by Taylor, with about 60 of hispeople, as a prisoner of war to General Winf. Scott, and with some of themwas confined for a while in Fortress Monroe; released June 5th, 1833. Thefirst stream of any size, on the Wisconsin side, above the scene of action wasnamed and is still called Bad Axe. A place above Battle cr. and Battle isl., verynear the battle-field, if not actually on the spot, was started by the name ofVictory, which it still bears. This is directly on the river-bank, at the mouth ofa rivulet which makes in there, about a mile below the spot where one Tippethad his landing. Tippet’s place was nearly opposite the Iowa-Minnesota Stateline, and 1½ m. S. of the lower mouth of Bad Axe r. As the price of theirdefeat the S. and F. Inds. were obliged to surrender a large tract of land,about 9,000 sq. m., along 180 m. of the W. bank of the Mississippi, and,perhaps, 50 m. broad; this became known as the Scott or the Black Hawkpurchase, and later as the Iowa district; it was attached to the Territory ofMichigan for judicial purposes in 1834, and the separate Territory of Iowa wasmade July 4th, 1838.

[I-52] By the river channel barely over the Iowa State line into Houston Co.,Minn., obliquely opposite Tippet’s landing, and about a mile below the mouthof Bad Axe r., which falls in on the Wisconsin side. Pike continues to haveWisconsin on his right until he crosses the mouth of St. Croix r.

I suspect that the Upper Iowa r., which Pike has just left, has a longer historicalrecord than that with which it is generally credited. Franquelin, 1688,maps a large river above the Wisconsin and below Root r., thus apparentlyin the position of the Upper Iowa. He letters Indians on it as Peoueria andTapoueri. Perrot’s Ayoës r. seems to be the same, as is certainly the Ioua r. ofLewis and Clark’s map, 1814. Long has Little Ioway r. in 1817, and UpperIaway r. in 1823.

[I-53] This is not very definite — perhaps Pike forgot to wind up his watch afterthe Sioux affair. But we shall be about right to set him down at Brownsville,Houston Co., Minn.; this is below Root r., which he passes to-morrow, andwithin convenient reach of the place, 3 m. beyond La Crosse, to which he comeson that rainy day. Starting from the State line, as already said, he first roundsBad Axe bend, at the mouth of Bad Axe r., and then comes to the town ofGenoa, 8¼ m. above Victoria. Genoa used to be called Bad Axe; but they donot seem to have fancied the name, or perhaps the Victorians crowed over them,and told them stories about George Washington and his little hatchet, so it waschanged. Bad Axe r. is also found with the F. name Mauvaise Hache: e. g.,Beltrami, II. p. 178. A mile above Genoa the river divides in two courses,inclosing an irregularly oval cluster of islands 6½ m. long; that on the Minnesotaside is Raft channel, which runs part of the way under bluffs; the one onthe Wisconsin side, which is or was lately the steamboat way, is Coon, Raccoon,or Racoon slough, with a creek of these names coming in about its middle,3 and 2 m. above Britt’s and Warner’s ldgs., respectively. The hills are somemiles back on this side, with a break where Coon cr. comes in, and so continueall the way to Prairie La Crosse. Brownsville is at the mouth of WildCat cr., 1½ m. above the place where the two courses of the river reunite, orrather begin to separate; and this town is 21 m. by the river-channel aboveVictoria — for Coon slough is very crooked. Britt’s ldg. became the site of aplace called Bergen; and one by the name of Stoddard is on the slough a littleabove Coon cr., about opp. Brownsville. The Wisconsin county line betweenVernon and La Crosse comes to the river between Stoddard and Mormon creeks.

[I-54] R. aux Racines of the French; Racine or Root r., the latter name nowmost used, though in the case of a well-known Wisconsin city the F. word persistsas the name. Nicollet calls it Hokah or Root r., and so does Owen. TheFranquelin map of 1688 marks a certain R. des Arounoues, which some authorsidentify with Lahontan’s semi-mythical R. Morte or Longue, and refer both toRoot r.; but this is questionable. Long speaks (I. p. 247) of Root r. as havingits Dakotan name Hoka, and being supposed to be the same as the RivièreLong or Rivière Morte of Lahontan, I. p. 112, called by Coxe in 1741, p. 19and p. 63, Mitschaoywa and Meschaouay. He utterly discredits the Baron’s"180 leagues" of this river, as well as his fabulous nations "Eokoros,""Essanapes," and "Gnacsitares." Without prejudice to the perennial question,which it would be a pity to settle now, whether the Baron was a knave or a fool,or most likely both, it may be observed that Major Long is mistaken in supposinghis Hoka or Root r. to be the one which Lahontan represents himself tohave gone up; for if he went up any real river, that is Cannon r., as Nicolleturges, and would clinch his argument by calling it Lahontan r.: see beyond.Hokah, Racine, or Root r. — to use all three of the sure names — is a largestream which runs E. through several of the lower tier of Minnesota counties,and falls in through Houston Co., 3½ m. directly S. of La Crosse, though thedistance is more than this by the winding river-channel. Mormon cr. comesinto the slough on the Wisconsin side opposite Root r., immediately belowLa Crosse prairie. The slough on the Minnesota side above Root r. is calledBroken Arrow — and this, by the way, is connected with a certain small Targetlake; so that no doubt some actual incident gave rise to both these names.This lake is the outlet of Pine cr.

[I-55] Three of Pike’s river-miles beyond La Crosse bring him to La Crescent,Houston Co., Minn., close to the border of Winona Co. — not that he says hecamped on the W. side, but he would naturally select that side in preferenceto the other, where the various outlets of La Crosse and Black rivers make sucha snicarty. La Crescent is curiously so called, apparently in rivalry with LaCrosse, and perhaps by some individual who thought he knew what La Crossemeans, and was minded to suggest by the Turkish emblem that the star of thenew place was in the ascendant and the town bound to grow. Thus far, however,it has been more of an excrescence from La Crosse than a crescence ofitself. Crosse, in French, does not mean "cross," but the game of hockey,shinny, or bandy, and the crooked stick or racket with which it is played. Pikedescribes the game beyond, under date of Apr. 20th, 1806. The F. word for"crescent" is croissant. The beautiful Prairie à la Crosse was so called by theFrench because the Indians used to play ball there when they felt safe; andwhen the enemy appeared they could scoop holes in it and scuttle into them ina few minutes. The river which laves this ball-ground on the N. became LaRivière de la Prairie à la Crosse, which we naturally shorten into La Crosser. Pike says la Cross and le Cross, usually. I have seen it spelled Crose.Lewis and Clark’s map of 1814 letters "Prairie La Crosse R." Long has in oneplace Prairie de la Cross. Featherstonhaugh turns the phrase into Ball Game r.It was probably by accident that Long once gave it as La Croix r.; for he iscareful in his statements, and his editor, Keating, is scholarly. This slip is particularlyunlucky, as it is liable to cause confusion with St. Croix, name of thelarge river higher up on the same side. The city of La Crosse was started onthe edge of the plain, immediately over the river, and gave name to the countyof which it became the seat. Two of the islands which the city faces are Grandand La Plume, respectively 1¼ and ¾ m. long. Close above La Crosse r. — infact, connected with one of its mouths at the place where the town of North LaCrosse was planted — is Black r. This has a long history. La Salle speaks ofit as R. Noire and Chabadeba [Beaver], in his letter of Aug. 22d, 1682; R.Noire appears on Franquelin’s map, 1688; Hennepin has it under the Siouxname Chabedeba or Chabaoudeba, and the like, translated Beaver r. Franqulinlocates a certain Butte d’Hyvernement, or wintering-hill, at the mouth ofR. Noire; Menard and Guerin are said to have ascended the latter in 1661.The most remarkable things about the mouth of Black r. are the extraordinarylength of its delta and the great changes which this has experienced withincomparatively few years. The waters of Black r., though it is not a very largestream, have found their way into the Mississippi from La Crosse upward for12 m. or more. There are now a number of openings, though the principalone is the lowermost, nearest La Crosse. Nicollet, writing about 1840, givesthis as the "new mouth" of the Sappah or Black r. (Sapah Watpa of theSioux), and calls the next one Broken Gun channel. This is rendered byF. Casse-Fusils in Beltrami, II. p. 178, who recites the gun-breaking incident.This channel now opens opposite the mouth of Dakota cr., which falls in underMineral bluff, at a place called Dakota. The main former debouchment seemsto have been at a point about 12 m. direct above La Crosse, through what isnow known as Hammond’s chute. In Pike’s time the mouth was evidentlyhigh up, for he does not pass it till the 13th. The present (or recent) channelis turbid and sloughy for some miles up from its contracted opening into theMississippi, reminding one of the similar but more pronounced expansion ofSt. Croix r. above its mouth. The width of the delta, or its extent sidewaysfrom the Mississippi, averages between 3 and 4 m., inclusive of a higher pieceof ground it incloses, called Lytle’s prairie or terrace; this is 4¼ m. long and20-30 feet above high-water mark; Half Way cr. comes around its lower end.The vicissitudes of Black r. may be among the reasons why exact identification ofsome places about its mouth in the early French writers is not easy. Speakingwith reserve, and ready to stand corrected by anyone who knows more than I doabout it, I do not see why the traditional Butte d’Hyvernement may not havebeen Mt. Trempealeau. As for the extent of the Black River basin, this islong enough to begin in Taylor Co., where waters separate in various directions,and to run through Clark and Jackson cos.; thence the river separates LaCrosse from Trempealeau Co. till it reaches the town of New Amsterdam;after which the river enters its delta in La Crosse Co., and the county line runs5 or 6 m. to the Mississippi on a parallel of latitude.

[I-56] From La Crosse to the town of Trempealeau is reckoned 19 m. by thechannel; the mountain is 3 m. further by the same way. Pike was advancedbeyond La Crosse when he started from La Crescent, and his 21 m. no doubtset him snug under the famous hill whose F. name snagged him when hereached it. This is not the mountain which "deceives" (trompe) in the water,as by mirage or reflection of itself reversed; but one which rises so abruptlyfrom the water’s edge that it seems to bathe, or at least to soak its feet, in thewater, and was therefore called by the French la Montagne qui Trempe à l’Eau — aclumsy phrase which we have reduced to Mt. Trempealeau, Mt. Trombalo,and various other terms not less curious. There is a notable assortment ofnames along the river. On decamping and crossing the bounds of Houston Co.into Winona Co., Minn., Pike comes to the Rising Sun — though his course isabout N., and we are not informed whether this name advertises a certain stove-polish,or is meant to throw in the shade both the Turkish crescent and theChristian cross. E. of Rising Sun is Minnesota isl., on the Wisconsin side.A few miles further is a place in Minnesota by the Teutonic name of Dresbach,at the head of Dresbach’s isl.; 1½ m. further is a town with the Siouan nameDakota; while E. of these (across the Black r. delta in Wis.) is a place calledOnalaska, suggestive of Captain Cook’s voyage to the Aleutian isls. OneWinter used to have his ldg. on the Wis. side, 2½ m. above Dakota, and inthe vicinity of the place where Black r. debouched in Pike’s time — Winter’sldg. being a singular verbal coincidence, almost like a pun upon the old nameof hibernation (Butte d’Hyvernement), which appears on the earlier pages ofMississippian history. At 3 m. above Winter’s ldg. stands Richmond, whichwas established under Queen’s bluff on the Minn. side. Both of these namessuggest English Colonial history of the times when a certain country was namedVirginia — certainly not to quiz one of the greatest women who ever graceda crown, but to emphasize a diplomatic euphemism. The "highest hill" inthis vicinity is Queen’s bluff, also known as Spirit rock — not that called Kettlehill by Long in 1817; its elevation was determined by Nicollet to be 531 feet,but was reduced to 375 feet by later measurements. The town of Trempealeau,in the Wis. co. of that name, is midway between Richmond and themountain; but before Pike reached the latter, he passed on his left the site ofLamoille, Minn., built under the bluff, about 300 feet high, between two creekswhose names are Trout and Cedar. It is really wonderful how much history ishidden — or revealed — in mere names. Personal and local words are the mostconcrete facts of history. If, for example, those which appear in this paragraphwere set forth at full length in proper historical perspective, we should have aperfect panorama of scenes and incidents along 20 m. of the river for 200 yrs.The myrionymous molehill on the river, which has been dignified by the name ofa mountain because there are no mountains to speak of in Wisconsin or Minnesota,and which has been belittled by a set of phrases so absurd that it could notbe further ridiculed if one were to call it Mt. Trombonello, or Mt. Trump Low,or Mt. Tremble Oh, or Mt. Soak-your-feet-in-mustard-water-and-go-to-bed-oh,has not only conferred titles on a town and a county in Wisconsin, but also onthe river which washes its foot, and which is known by one of the most uniquecircumlocutory phrases to be found in geographical terminology: La Rivière dela Montagne qui Trempe à l’Eau, of the French; River of the Mountain, etc.,Pike; Mont. q. t. à l’E. r., Owen; Mountain Island r., Nicollet; BluffIsland r., Long — and so on through all the chimes that can be rung out ofparaphrase. It is now usually called Trempealeau r., and forms the boundarybetween this and Buffalo cos. The Sioux name of the mountain is renderedMinnay Chonkahah, or Bluff in the Water, by Featherstonhaugh. A morefrequent form of this is Minneshonka. The Winnebago name is given as Hay-me-ah-chanor Soaking mountain in Hist. Winona Co., 1883. The island onwhich the mountain rests has a corresponding series of names.

Pike passed to-day the place where was once situated an old French fort,which has lately been unearthed alongside the Chic., Burl. and N. R. R. Thesite is on the S. half of the S. E. quarter of Section 20, Township 18 N.,Range 9 W., 1¾ m. above the village, and 1½ m. below the mountain, ofTrempealeau. It was discovered by T. H. Lewis, July, 1885, and by himexamined in Nov., 1888, and again in Apr., 1889: see his article, Mag. Amer.Hist., Sept., 1889, and separate, 8vo. p. 5, with three cuts, and postscript datedFeb. 22d, 1890. See also T. H. Kirk, Mag. Amer. Hist., Dec., 1889, articleentitled, "Fort Perrot, Wisconsin, established in 1685, by Nicholas Perrot," withreference to the evasive Butte d’Hyvernement, or wintering-hill of the Franquelinmap, 1688. The separate of Mr. Lewis’ article is entitled, "Old FrenchPost at Trempeleau, Wisconsin." "Fort Perrot," as a name of this establishment,must not be confounded with the one often so called on Lake Pepin.

[I-57] A meaningless phrase as it stands, and one open to various rendering, asL’Aile, L’Ail, or L’ — — le. Pike’s text of 1807, p. 12, has L’aile; Long’s of 1807,as printed in Minn. Hist. Coll., II. Part 1, 2d ed. 1890, p. 175, has Aux Aisle;Beltrami’s, II. p. 180, gives aux Ailes. "The site of Winona was known tothe French as La Prairie Aux Ailes (pronounced O’Zell) or the Wing’s prairie,presumably because of its having been occupied by members of Red Wing’sband," Hist. Winona Co., 1883. It is easily recognized by Pike’s vivid description:see next note. Long, l. c., calls it "an extensive lawn," and notes thesituation on it in 1817 of an Indian village, whose chief he calls Wauppaushawby a rather unusual spelling of the native name of La Feuille. Forsyth, 1819,names it Wing prairie.

[I-58] From his camp in the vicinity of Trempealeau and Lamoille towns, a littlebelow the Mountain which, etc., Pike makes it 21 m. to-day and 25 m. to-morrowto a point opp. the mouth of Buffalo r. He is therefore to-day a littleshort of halfway between Trempealeau and Alma. From Trempealeau toFountain City is 20 m. by the channel; from Fountain City to Alma is 22 m.Pike camps to-day at Fountain City, Buffalo Co., Wis., immediately belowthe mouth of Eagle cr. The island at the head of which he breakfasted,and where Frazer’s boats came up, was No. 75, which separates the Homerchute, also called Blacksmith slough, from the rest of the Mississippi. Thoughnarrow, this is, or lately was, the steamboat channel. Opposite is town ofHomer, Winona Co., Minn., under Cabin bluff (most probably Kettle hill ofLong). At 1½ m. above Homer, on the same side, is the town of Minneopa.Here the bluffs recede from the river; here Pike left his boats for an excursionon the hills. The "Prairie Le Aisle," which he first crossed, is in Burris valley.The highest point of the hills which he ascended for his prospect is called theSugarloaf. Standing there to-day, we overlook Winona, seat of the county, andat the foot of the hills between us and the town is Lake Winona, nearly 2 m.long, discharging into Burris Valley cr. Looking E. from the Sugar-loaf,down-river, we perceive that the Mountain which, etc., is simply a point of thebluffs which stands isolated in the delta of Trempealeau r. To our left of it aswe look, and beyond it eastward, stretches the high prairie between the deltajust said and that of Black r. Rambling further along the hills back of Winonawe come to Minnesota City, at a break in the bluffs through which a rivuletfinds its way into Crooked slough. From this spot Fountain City is in fullview, 3½ air-miles off on a course N. by E., under Eagle bluff, on the otherside of the river. A portion of these bluffs is probably that called TumblingRock by Forsyth in 1819. We could keep along the hills till they strike theriver about 5 m. further. But Mr. Frazer is anxious to get back to the boats;very likely Bradley and Sparks are also. So we descend into the bottom fromMinnesota City, flounder across some sloughs, and on reaching the W. bank ofthe Mississippi, we signal to our men to come over in a canoe and ferry us toFountain City.

[I-59] Fountain City to Alma, 22 m. Camp opp. Alma, in Wabasha Co., Minn.,amid the intricacies of the Zumbro delta. For many miles above and belowthis place — from Chippewa r. down to Winona, say 40 m. — the Father ofWaters, like the father of Shem, Ham, and Japhet, if we can credit the chroniclesof that ancient mariner, gets himself in very bad form. He reels along asif he would like to take both sides of the bluffs at once. Great skill has beenshown by engineers in trying to steer him in the way he should go; much moneyhas been spent in throwing out jetties like friends at each elbow of the staggeringpatriarch, to mend his ways; some of his worst lurches have been dammedas a matter of necessity, and all of them have been otherwise objurgated asa matter of course by every steamboat captain. The late General G. K.Warren, who was intrusted with the responsible duty of surveying the riverwith reference to the improvement of navigation, makes a most accurateobservation in his preliminary Rep., Ex. Doc. No. 57, 2d Sess. 39th Congr.,p. 19: "It is often remarked, ’What a slight thing will cause a change of theriver.’ But it is erroneous to infer from this that it is easy to make it changeas we wish. Effects are often accumulating unobserved during a state ofunstable equilibrium. A slight cause then disturbs this, and marked changestake place. But it is exceedingly superficial to attribute the whole effect to thislast cause." In consequence of the great changes in the river, both naturaland artificial, since the days of Pike, we must not assume the present or quiterecent details to be those of Pike’s time; nor should we presume to speak censoriouslyregarding the identification of such things as Carver’s supposed fortificationsof 1766-67. Within the bounds of the solid, if not eternal hills, throughwhich the water has excavated its trough, we have the great river safe enough.But these bounds are some miles apart, and between them all is in the "unstableequilibrium" of which the eminent engineer just cited speaks. The result isincessant shiftiness or shiftlessness, not only as regards the sloughy bottoms andsnicarties themselves, but in respect of the sands which accumulate in variousplaces and form banks or terraces which sometimes take such shapes as to beeasily mistaken for artificial mounds. The cardinal principle of soundarchæology is to assume every mound to be a natural formation until it isproven to be the work of man. One of the most notable historical instances inpoint is that of the "fortifications" at Bon Homme, on the Missouri r., whichdeceived even so accurate an observer as Captain Clark: see L. and C., ed.1893, p. 103, seq., and pl. Some of the present or quite recent water-ways inthe vicinity of Fountain City are those known as Pap chute, Betsy, Haddock,and Rollingstone sloughs, Horseshoe bend, and Fountain City bay, into whichEagle cr. falls, under Eagle bluff. The hills then come to the river on theMinnesota side, and so continue past Mt. Vernon to Minneiska. One of theboldest of these headlands is called Chimney Rock. Some have an altitude of450 feet. On the other side the bluffs recede above Fountain City, break togive passage to Eagle c., start again about 2½ m. from the river, and thenceupward approach gradually till they strike the river at Alma. The spacebetween these hills and the river bottom is partly filled by a sand terrace forabout 9 m., with an average width of a mile. On the edge of the upper one ofthese banks is Buffalo City, 2 m. above which a place was started by the nameof Belvidere. The boundary between Winona and Wabasha cos. comes ona parallel of latitude to the river at Minneiska, a town named for the river atwhose mouth it is situated, under high bluffs, facing the lower part of Summerfieldor Summerfield’s isl., which is 4 m. long. This river is Pike’s "LeanClare," clearly by typographical error, as he elsewhere has Riviere l’Eau Clair,almost right, and correctly translates the phrase by Clear r. and Clear Water r.This is also White Water r. of Long and others, at present the usual alternativename of Minneiska r.; Miniskon r., Nicollet; Miniskah r., Owen; Minneskar., Warren; and so on with the forms of the Indian word. Clear r.comes into the bottom between the Minneiska bluffs and a certain isolated hillto the northward, in the vicinity of which Clear r. is still or was lately connectedwith one of the lowest sluices of the Zumbro r. This last is what Pikecalls riviere Embarrass (river Embaras, ed. 1807, p. 13). The French namedit Rivière aux Embarras, from the difficulty they found in attempting tonavigate it, and we have made Zumbro out of this embarrassment. Nicolletcalls it Wazi Oju r., in which he is followed by Owen and others. Its deltaextends practically from Minneiska to Wabasha, a distance of 20 m. by theMississippi channel. The opening which Pike takes as the mouth is the lowerone, as he passes it before camping opp. Alma. This delta incloses one long,narrow sand terrace, continuous for 9 m., and several similar but smaller banks,as well as an extensive system of sloughs and islands. The West Newton chuteand accompanying islands are among these; and Pike’s camp was at the headof this chute, directly opposite Alma and the mouth of Buffalo r. The historyof this river dates back to 1680 at least: R. des B — ufs, Hennepin, map, 1683;River of Wild Bulls, Hennep., Engl. transl.; B — ufs R., Lahontan, map;Buffaloe or Buffalo r., Pike, Long, Nicollet, Owen, etc.; Beef r., Warren andothers; cf. also, R. de Bon Secours of the early F. writers, whence GoodHelp r. by translation. Some connect the two names, as R. des B — ufs ou deBon Secours, as if the supply of beef had been a great relief. There wereplenty of buffaloes on this part of the Mississippi in the seventeenth andeighteenth centuries, and indeed down to some early years of our own. Butthey were exterminated or driven off soon after Fort St. Anthony (Snelling) wasbuilt in 1819. Fort St. Antoine appears in earliest connection with the river.Its own mouth has no doubt been fixed since prehistoric times by the solidAlma bluffs around which it sweeps into the Mississippi. But the delta ofChippewa r., whose main discharge is by a contracted opening 9½ directmiles above the mouth of Buffalo r., extends between these two points, and ismeandered by the intricacies of Beef slough, which such competent professionalopinion as Warren’s pronounces to have once divided the main Chippewa:Ex. Doc. No. 57, etc., p. 13. "The Chippeway river had a large lateral gorgelike that of the St. Croix to fill up before reaching the valley of the Mississippi,and it now joins the Mississippi by a very complete set of delta streams, beginningabout 15 miles above its mouth. There was a time when the mouth nowknown as Beef slough was about equal to the main Chippeway. In theirgrowth each kept along the bluffs or sides of the gorge they were filling up,raising their immediate banks and leaving a depression between them. Thebank which the present Mississippi finally put across the delta was not thenthere, and large trees grew up on this intermediate space. The delta havingfinally reached the Mississippi, the water was more rapidly raised in LakePepin. This intermediate space was closed up on its third side by the newforming bank of the Mississippi, and became a lake. The trees in it thenperished, and their submerged parts, preserved by the water, remain standingin the lake at this time [July 31st, 1865]. This place is known as Stump lake,and this name it bore among the aboriginal Sioux (Chan-poksa-m’dé). Thelower of these two delta mouths became obstructed and dammed up by the newforming banks of the Mississippi; the lower part of it then filled up, and itfinally broke through its own banks into Stump lake, so that it now issuestherefrom in several much obstructed channels, almost entirely useless tonavigation.... The Trempealeau and Black rivers repeat the operation of theChippeway on a smaller scale, the Wisconsin probably on a greater, otherstreams doing the same in proportion to their size." In this view of Beef sloughas an obstructed channel of the Chippewa, Beef or Buffalo r. is simply anaffluent of the Chippewa, precisely as the Minneiska is of the Zumbro, or LaCrosse of Black r.; and other such cases of originally distinct rivers falling intothe Mississippi as one by their deltopoetic processes could easily be cited.

[I-60] "Grand Encampment" is a phrase in use since Carver’s Travels firstappeared. Carver first came to Lake Pepin Nov. 1st, 1766. Those who wishto verify the fact will find it on p. 34 of the Phila. ed. of 1796, which is commonerand therefore more accessible than any of the earlier ones; the Londonprinceps, 1778, is a rare book; the place is p. 54 of this ed. On p. 35, Carversays the place was "some miles below Lake Pepin." This left the location in theair, especially as he does not say which side of the river; and various authorshave raised such a fog about it that we might be excused if we failed to find itanywhere. By Pike as above, the place is between Buffalo r. and Chippewar.; he starts late, noons on the spot, and gets into Lake Pepin atdusk. On his return voyage, Apr. 15th, 1806, he stops at the place; hemakes it on the right (west) bank, 9 m. below Lake Pepin. When Long comesby, in 1823, his boat-party camps opposite the mouth of Buffalo r., just asPike did yesterday; on the 30th of June they find themselves "a few miles"below L. Pepin, and much concerned to discover Carver’s "fortifications": seeKeating, I. pp. 276-78. The upshot of their long discussion is the conclusionthat Carver did really see what he says he saw, but that the works he describedwere not at the Grand Encampment, where they found no fortifications.But this is clearly a non sequitur, or a lucus a non, or a petitio principii, or anargumentum ad hominem, or whatever may be the logical definition of anillogical syllogism. It misses the point. The question is not one of identifyingCarver’s locality; the question is whether what he saw there was an artificialwork or a natural formation. The place can be pointed out with thepoint of a pin stuck through the map, provided the topography has not changedtoo much for that during the century; for the point which now points toCarver’s location is Point Teepeeota of the U. S. survey chart. The pointabove, at which Major Long’s boat-party landed an hour or two later that day,and "which appeared to correspond with the description" of Carver’s place,though "their search here was likewise unsuccessful" (p. 278), is the presentsite of Wabasha — the place where Nicholas Perrot is thought to have landedin 1683, and built a log fort, the first thing of the kind in all that country,afterward marked on some maps as Fort Perrot. Teepeeota pt. is theprojecting end of the long narrow sand-drift or sand terrace already mentionedas extending 9 m. or more in the delta of the Zumbro; it strikes theMississippi immediately below the Middle mouth of the Zumbro, and infact determines the position of that opening. Teepeeota pt. is 4½ m. directabove Alma, somewhat more than 5 m. by the channel; it is 3 m. direct belowWabasah, a little more by the channel; it is 6 m. below the upper mouth ofChippewa r., say 7 by the channel. The Indian name would be more correctlyrendered Tipiotah — tipi meaning a lodge or dwelling (such as is called "wigwam"in novels, but seldom so on the spot) and the rest of the word denotingmultitude; the paper-town there, called Tepeeotah City, went up in smoke, 1859.The island off Teepeeota pt., but a little lower down, is now called GrandEncampment isl. Of the accuracy of this identification I do not see how therecan be any question, though time has modified the contour details in the courseof nature, as well as in the course of the engineering work done there of lateyears. These fortifications of the river against its own sands are doubtless theonly ones of any magnitude that have ever been made on the spot, before orsince Carver; though there was nothing to hinder the Sioux from scoopingholes in the sand-drift and scuttling into them when the Chippewas came insight, as we know they did at Prairie La Crosse and elsewhere. Under thesecircumstances, I think the gentlemen of Major Long’s party were as unjust tothemselves in doubting their own identifications (in which they were supportedby Hart, Rolette, and others who knew about the place), as they were to Carverin saying, p. 277: "No gentleman of the party would be willing to ascribe toCarver a scrupulous adherence to truth, (personal observation having convincedthem all of the many misrepresentations contained in his work)." If this ismeant to charge Carver with willful misrepresentation, I think it is unjust aswell as ungenerous. Carver mistook a natural for an artificial work — so didWilliam Clark, to the extent of drawing one to a scale and describing it in theterms of military science — so have done many professional archæologists. Carvermade mistakes, like the rest of us; he was often loose about distances, dimensions,and such things; he believed more things that were told him than a lesshonest and more wary wayfarer would have taken to be true; but I think thathe drew a short bow for so long a journey, had no occasion to deceive anyonebut himself, and always intended to tell the truth as it seemed to him — in short,I do not see how his good faith can be seriously questioned. I accept Carver’sstatements, as I do those of Pike, Long, and other honest persons, for whatthey may prove to be worth.

[I-61] R. des Sauteurs, etc., of the French, i. e., River of the Chippewas, withall the uncounted variations of the latter word, from such forms as Ouchipouwaictzto the present Chippewa, Chippeway, or Chipeway. Pike’s 1807 texthas Sautiaux r., p. 13. Beltrami has Cypewais in text, Cypoway on map.Present usage among geographers favors two p’s and no y; the ethnologistsincline rather to Ojibwa. This one of the major tributaries of the Mississippinow falls in by its main upper mouth 1½ m. below the end of Lake Pepin, fromthe N., nearly at a right angle; it is somewhat bottle-nosed — that is, with a contractedorifice of a turgid body of water, though the dilation is not so great asin the case of the St. Croix. The general character of the delta has beenalready discussed in connection with Beef slough. Pike has this on his rightall the way from Alma to L. Pepin. On his left he passes Grand Encampmentisl. and dines near Point Teepeeota, already described as the point of that sandbankI should wish to call Carver’s Terrace. He next comes to Wabasha, seatof the Minnesota county of that name, so called from the celebrated Siouxchief of whom we read much in Long, I. p. 272, and elsewhere; his name isthere spelled Wapasha, and his village was at that time not on this spot, butlower down (Winona). The site of Wabasha duplicates the situation at PointTeepeeota; it is in the Zumbro delta, below the Upper Zumbro outlet, on thepoint of a sand-bank identical in formation with Carver’s Terrace, though muchsmaller — under 3 m. in length, and less than a mile wide. Passing Wabasha,Pike comes 2 m. to the town now called Read’s Landing, at the uppermostpoint of the Zumbro floodplain, almost opposite the mouth of Chippewa r.Nicollet marks "Roques," i. e., Augustin Rocque’s trading-house, in about theright position, i. e. at present site of Wabasha, where Rocque’s old chimney wasevidence in 1884. This person, whose last name might be spelled with a g aswell as his first, very likely lived on more than one spot in the course of hiscareer. Featherstonhaugh informs us that "Ruque’s" Indian name wasWajhustachay, and that his house stood on the edge of a high prairie, 50 feetfrom the water, at S. E. end of L. Pepin, right bank, opp. Chip. r.; which fitsin only with the site of present Read’s Landing. Here the C., M. and St. P. R.R. bridged the Miss. r. in ’82 (Act of Congr., Mar. 28th, ’82). As indicated inan earlier note, the Chippewa is one of the main waterways between the Mississippiand the Great Lakes; the connection will be more particularly noted hereafter.Carver went this way in June or July, 1867, after he had wintered up the St. Peter.For some distance from its mouth this river separates Pepin from Buffalo Co.

[I-62] Apparently a misprint: Alma to Read’s Landing, near the foot of LakePepin, 12 m. by the crooked channel; thence to Wakouta, near the head ofthe lake, is only 25 m., and Pike is not yet halfway through. He sayshimself that he made 3 m. further to Sandy pt., and then 18 m. up to Cannonr. He undoubtedly ran for shelter from the gale at or near Stockholm,Pepin Co., Wis. The channel is or has lately been along the Minnesota sideto Lake City, crossing obliquely to the other side in passing Stockholm, thenleaving for the Minn. side to reach Point No Point, and so on up this side toWakouta, Red Wing, and Cannon r. "Le lac est petit, mais il est malin":I faithfully copy this venerable Jo Miller, and am ready to agree that the lakeis not big, but bad. It is reckoned about 21 m. long, averaging about 2½ broad;thus it is merely a dilation of the Mississippi, like that of the St. Croix andsome other Mississippian tributaries, though on a larger scale. The Chippewar. was concerned in the formation of Lake Pepin, and the two have hadsome reciprocal effect. General Warren’s opinion may be here cited, Ex. Doc.No. 57, 1866-67, p. 11: "In order to better understand the formation of thepresent bottom-land valley, and comprehend the existing state of things, wemust go back to the time when, by the elevation of the continent above theocean, the present rivers, like the Wisconsin and Chippeway, began to flow intothe channel formed by the present Mississippi bluffs. As soon as the sedimentbrought down by their waters had filled up the lateral chasm by which theyjoined the Mississippi, this sediment would begin to obstruct the flow of theMississippi water, force its channel to the opposite side, and narrow and damit back till the water gained sufficient force to carry the sediment down thevalley. The continual sorting out of this sediment would leave the heavierparticles behind, so that this bar would continually increase in elevation andform a lake above. There are evidences of the effect of the Wisconsin inmaking such a dam in the neighborhood of Prairie du Chien, also by otheraffluents above their mouths, which lakes have since been filled up. In thecase of the Chippeway and Lake Pepin this effect still remains, the affluentsabove the Chippeway not having been able to fill up the lake which wasformed. It seems almost impossible to doubt that this is the origin of LakePepin, and there are evidences in the shape of the sand and boulder spits alongthe Mississippi bluffs above Lake Pepin, such as are only formed now in it andLake St. Croix, which indicate that the lake formerly extended up much higherthan now.... The river now enters Lake Pepin by three principal mouths, andthe land of the delta gently slopes down to and under the water. It hasadvanced very slowly, if at all, since first visited by white men. The largestsized cottonwood trees, dying of old age, are found on the islands withintwo miles of the head of the lake. The small willows on the low and extremepoints seem of an almost uniform size and age; and are small more, perhaps,from the unfavorable condition in which they are placed than from want oftime to grow since the land was formed. The bottom in the shoal places atthe head of Lake Pepin is composed of soft mud, and not of sand. It seemsprobable that nearly all the other islands of the Mississippi were formed insimilar lakes by advancing deltas, until finally the lakes were filled up. LakePepin has almost no current, and deepens gradually down to near the point ofentrance of the Chippeway, and then rapidly shoals and narrows to form againthe flowing river." Lake Pepin is curved on itself, more so than the old-fashionedItalic letter , there being a bend in the middle reach which is oblique betweenthe straight and approximately parallel reaches at the two ends — say W. N. W.and E. S. E., then N. and S., then nearly W. and E. The lake nearly fillsthe space between the bluffs in which it is embedded, but there are severalpieces of arable bottom-land in places where the bluffs recede, furnishing thesites of a corresponding number of settlements, mostly at points where creeksor brooks fall in between gaps in the hills. Such are Pepin and Stockholm,Pepin Co., Wis.; Maiden Rock City and Bay City, Pierce Co., Wis.; LakeCity, Wabasha Co., Minn.; Florence, Frontenac, and Wakouta or Wacouta,Goodhue Co., Minn. Maiden Rock City is under the line of bluffs, about 400feet high, to several of which the Winona legend attaches; but this town is atthe mouth of Rush cr., and thus nearly 5 m. by the railroad above that bluffto which the names of Maiden’s Rock, Maiden’s Head, and Lover’s Leap moreparticularly belong. This is directly opposite Sandy point, and only about 2 m.by rail above the village of Stockholm; being that one of the series of quitesimilar bluffs which has a remarkable vertical escarpment, at a point wherethere is little room to spare for the track between the talus at its foot and thelake shore. A good view is obtained as the cars recede from it. Rush cr. ismapped both by Pike and by Nicollet, without name; it seems to be that calledPorcupine-Quill cr. by Schoolcraft, and is perhaps Marchessau r. of Featherstonhaugh.A similar stream, also mapped by Pike and by Nicollet, withoutname, and now known as Pine or Mill Pine cr., falls in 1½ m. below Rush cr.Three other small streams, known as Bogus cr., Lost cr., and Roaring r., fall inbelow Stockholm on the Wisconsin side; on which side, near the head of thelake, at the place called Bay City, is Isabel cr. (the Clear Water cr. of Nicollet,and perhaps the Rocher Rouge r. of Featherstonhaugh). On the Minnesotaside a creek falls in below and another above Lake City; Wells cr. (the SandyPoint cr. of Pike, and the Sand Point r. of Nicollet), falls in at the pointindicated by these names, a mile or more below Frontenac; while at Wacoutawe find a stream mapped by Nicollet without name, formerly called Bullard’sand now known as Ida cr. The most prominent part of the Minnesota shore,where the channel sweeps around the convexity of the bold headland, is fittinglycalled Point No Point — as the up-bound passenger discovers when the boatrounds it. This is immediately above Frontenac, opp. Maiden Rock City, andabout the junction of the middle with the upper reach of the lake. This bodyof water is between two States and four counties. The line between Pepin andPierce cos., Wis., strikes it at or near Maiden Rock City; that between Wabashaand Goodhue, Minn., comes to the lake below Frontenac, about Lake City.

Lake Pepin is commonly said to have been "discovered by Hennepin" in1680. This statement is exactly one-third right and two-thirds wrong, anddoes a double injustice, because it ignores two of the three white men who weresimultaneously on the spot. These were: 1. Michael Accault, the bourgeoisor leader of the party, who afterward flourished under the style of Le Sieurd’Accault, d’Acau, d’Ako, Dacan, etc. 2. His man Antoine Auguelle, commonlycalled Le Picard, or Picard du Gay. 3. His ecclesiastical functionaryLouis Hennepin, a monk of the Franciscan order, whom La Salle got rid of bysending him along with Accault and Auguelle, when this Chaas trading-partystarted from Fort Crèvec — ur on the Illinois r., Feb. 29th, 1680; they reachedthe Miss. r. at the mouth of the Illinois, Mar. 7th, 1680, and came to LakePepin in June of that year. It is a pity that the reverend father’s vanity, servility,and envy prevented him from sticking to his ghostly trade; but he wasambitious of authorship, like many another religious worldling, and jealous ofLa Salle. So he set about a book for the glory of a trinity composed of LouisHennepin, Louis XIV., and God. It has made much trouble for geographersand historians, who would willingly have waited for all the information that itcontains till this should have been imparted by some less bigoted, less bombastic,and more veracious chronicler than this Recollect priest, who recollecteda good many things that never happened, and forgot some of those that didoccur. Hennepin is the able philologist who discovered that the Indians calledtheir solar deity by the name of the then King of France, and who followedup this discovery by naming the whole country Louisiana. He is the sameunscrupulous courtier who represents the king’s arms to have been cut in thebark of an oak west of Lac des Assenipoils, ca. lat. 60° N.: see his map, placemarked "Armes du Roy telle quelle sont grauée sur l’escorce d’vn Chesne alendroit marqué — A". The tree may be there yet, but the monk never was.Lahontan’s fables are entertaining, like La Fontaine’s; Hennepin’s are abore. When this little Louis is not wheedling the great Louis, he is apt to bewhining; he was troubled with gumboils, from dental caries, and did notalways remember the excellent injunction he received from Father Gabriel — viriliterage et comfortetur cor tuum; which an Englishman might freely render,"Be a man and keep your courage up." This missionary lachrymoselynamed the lake, to which Accault, Auguelle, and himself were taken by theIndians, Lac des Pleurs, a phrase which appears in Engl. transls. of his book asLake of Tears, "which we so named," as Shea’s text reads, p. 198, "becausethe Indians who had taken us, wishing to kill us, some of them wept the wholenight, to induce the others to consent to our death" — hinc illæ lacrymæ. Hennepin,by the way, says further, ibid.: "Half a league below the Lake ofTears, on the south side, is Buffalo river." This would make R. aux B — ufs =Chippewa r.: see note59, p. 58, for some bearings on the case. The obscurityof the origin of the name Lake Pepin has not been cleared up, so far as Iknow. Lesueur came here Sept. 14th, 1700, and "Pepin" is found in La Harpe’sMS. relation of Lesueur’s journey of July 12th-Dec. 13th, 1700. It isunlikely that this name, by whomever given, was bestowed with direct referenceto any person of the Carlovingian dynasty; they were all dead and goneages before the lake was discovered, when nobody but historical researcherstook any interest in those defunct monarchs. St. Croix’s and St. Pierre’srivers were certainly named for contemporaneous individuals, and so probablywas Lake Pepin. There were a number of Frenchmen by the name of Pepin,Papin, etc., in the country in later years, and some one or more of themmay have come before 1700. Carver first came here Nov. 1st, 1766; he notesthe remains of an old F. factory, "where it is said Capt. St. Pierre resided."Old Ft. St. Antoine may have been on the lake rather than at the mouth ofR. des B — ufs ou de Bon Secours; and the lake was once called Lac de BonSecours, or Bonsecours, a phrase which has been translated Lake Good Helpand Lake Relief. Fort Beauharnois was built on the lake, after Sept. 17th, 1727,when La Perriere du Boucher landed on Pointe au Sable or elsewhere; theexact site is unknown. This was an extensive and substantial structure, and wasnamed in honor of the then Governor of Canada; it included a mission-housewhich the ecclesiastical functionaries of Boucher’s outfit called St. Michael, afteran archangel of that denomination. This was the fourth French establishment;the other three having been Fort L’Huillier, 1700, built by Lesueur, on theBlue Earth r., a branch of St. Pierre’s; the fort on Isle Pelée, below Hastings,by Lesueur also, in 1695; and the fort below the foot of Lake Pepin, at or nearpresent Wabasha, built by Perrot, 1683.

[I-63] To a position 1½ m. below present Frontenac, Goodhue Co., Minn., aboutthe mouth of Sand Point r. of Nicollet, now called Wells cr.; this is below presentPoint No Point, and Frontenac is between. The county was named by theLegislative Assembly of Minnesota, in 1853, for James M. Goodhue, b.Hebron, N. H., Mar. 31st, 1810, came to St. Paul, Minn., Apr. 18th, 1849,founded the Pioneer newspaper, d. 8.30 p. m., Friday, Aug. 27th, 1852: seehis obit. by E. D. Neill, Minn. Hist. Soc. Coll., I (orig. ed. 1850-56), 2d ed.1872, pp. 245-53.

[I-64] Pike calls him Murdock Cameron on Apr. 12th: see that date; text of1807 has Mordock Cameron, p. 59 and p. 64: see also L. and C., ed. 1893,pp. 239, 1222. This is the same Cameron of whom Featherstonhaugh, CanoeVoyage, etc., I. 1847, p. 314, speaks at length, and whose death in 1811is given as follows: "Passed a place on the right bank [of St. Pierre’s r.,above the Waraju] where Milor [F.’s voyageur] buried his bourgeois, a Mr.Cameron, in 1811. He was an enterprising, sagacious Scotchman who hadamassed a good deal of property by trafficking with the Indians;... andwhilst upon one of his expeditions he was taken ill in his canoe, was landed,and died in the woods." Fgh. does not hint at foul play here; for the suspicionsin the case, see Long, as cited in my L. and C. Cameron was buriedon a bluff near Lac qui Parle, the lake where his trading-post was, and "Cameron’sgrave" has continued to be an identified spot from that day to this.Cameron’s name appears as that of one of the four witnesses to Pike’s Siouxtreaty of Sept. 23d on one of the manuscript copies of that document before me.The "Milor" mentioned here was a Canadian French half-breed who becamevery well known as a resident of Mendota, Minn., where he died about 1860,"after a long life full of adventure and daring exploits," as J. F. Williamssays, Minn. Hist. Coll., I. 2d. ed. 1872, p. 375.

[I-65] Those of a sentimental turn who may like to have the full-rounded legendof the maiden Winona will find the romance related in a scholarly yet sympatheticvein by Prof. Keating, in Long of 1823, pub. 1824, I. pp. 280-85.Beltrami, II. p. 183, calls the girl Oholoaïtha, her lover Anikigi, comparing thepair to the muse of Mitylene and Phaon. Whether the tragic event is fact orfancy is another question I see no use of raising. There is no inherent improbabilityin the case; any girl could have thrown herself over the rock withmore ease than she had climbed it for that purpose, and suicide is not lessfrequent among squaws than various other peoples of both sexes. In thecase of Indian women the most usual causes are said to be grief, anger, andrevenge, though in some cases the suicidal resolve is more deliberate, andrather a matter of social etiquette or of a religious code than of emotionalinsanity. I understand that hanging is the customary method of taking one’sself off; and that the smallest tree which will answer the purpose is preferred,because it is an article of belief that the ghost thus discarnated mustdrag the instrument of death about for a period, and a woman naturally prefersto lighten the load as much as possible. Supposing Winona to havetaken the fatal leap, it is reasonable to infer from the faith in such affairsthat she is there yet, chained to the rock like another Andromeda; for thebluff is too big for her to budge an inch, even with the assistance of a possiblePerseus. There is unimpeachable precedent for her performance inthe classics, not entirely dissociated from the name and fame of the giftedpoetical archetæra Sappho; and rocks reputed to be the scenes of lovers’ leapsabound in history and geography.

[I-66] That much-named river, whereto hangs a tale of great length. Pike herehas the right name of it, though it is now usually called Cannon r., by perversionof the French Rivière aux Canots: Cano, Canot, Canon, Canow r. ofvarious writers; Riviere au Canon, Canoe r., Cannon r., Pike, passim; Canon r.,Long’s map; Eamozindata or High Rock r., Long’s text, 1824, I. p. 263; InyanBosndata r., Natural Obelisk r., Standing Rock r., Lahontan r., Cannon r.,Nicollet, text and map. It is commonly supposed that the stream marked R.aux Raisins on Franquelin’s map of 1688 is this river, and I see no objection tothis identification; for though the name is suspiciously like a mistake for R.aux Racines, the river is laid down as above the Chippewa, and can hardly havebeen intended for Root r. The main question is whether R. Morte and R.Longue (Long r.), Lahontan, 1686-87, are names to be added to the synonymsof this stream. The Baron Lahontan, "Lord Lieutenant of the French colonyat Placentia in Newfoundland," gives an account of himself on the Miss. r. inLetter XVI. of his book, pp. 104-141 of the English ed., Lond., 1735. Thisletter is "Dated at Missilimakinac, May 28th, 1689, containing an Account ofthe Author’s Departure from, and Return to Missilimackinac. A Descriptionof the Bay of Puante, and its Villages. An Ample Description of the Beavers;followed by the journal of a remarkable Voyage upon the LongRiver, and a Map of the adjacent Country." According to this relationLahontan came by the Fox-Wisconsin route to Prairie du Chien Oct. 23d,1686, thus hard upon the heels of Accault’s party, who had Hennepin along:"On the 3d [of Nov.] we entered the Mouth of the Long River, which lookslike a lake full of Bull-rushes; we found in the middle of it a narrow Channel,"etc. He continued his journey, on paper if not on the river, and returnedto the Mississippi Mar. 2d, 1687; dropped down to the Missouri Mar. 17th;went up the Missouri to the Osage r.; down the Missouri to the Mississippiagain Mar. 25th; down the Mississippi to the Wabash, and back up to the IllinoisApr. 7th; up the Illinois to Fort Crêvec — ur Apr. 16th; arrived at"Chekakou" Apr. 24th; and made Michilimackinac soon afterward. Thewhole crux of Lahontan’s relation is in his Long r., which he professes tohave ascended a great distance to the countries of the Eororos, Esanapes, andGnacsitares, where he also got wind of equally peculiar people called Mozeemlekand Tahuglauk. The main feature of his map is the "Morte or River Longue,"represented as larger than that portion of the Mississippi which he traces, andas heading in a great lake which connects across high mountains by numerouslarge streams with another great river which runs off his map due W.De te fabula narratur. But there is nothing to forbid us to suppose thatLahontan went up to or toward, or even ascended, some such stream as Cannonr., and then simply tacked this on to St. Peter’s r. by hearsay. We mustin justice observe that all he professes to know about Long r. above the pointhe says he ascended it he acknowledges he got from the natives; and he iscareful to separate his map into two parts by a heavy line lettered "TheDivision of the Two Maps," i. e., his own and one "drawn upon Stag-skinsby ye Gnacsitares." Such a piece of patch-work would easily make hisLong r. out of Cannon or some similar stream, run on to the whole courseof St. Peter’s above the Mankato or Blue Earth r. Fortunately we havelittle to do with the Baron’s crazy-quilt, but I must here quote Nicollet,because he sees reason to believe that Lahontan really did ascend Cannonr., and has signalized his conclusion by naming it Lahontan r. on his map.Though the gentle Nicollet’s quality of mercy was never strained, yet hisjudgments, even his special pleadings, deserve always the most respectful consideration.Nicollet says, in substance, Rep. pp. 20, 21, that he was forcedto this conclusion after surveying the Undine region; that the principal statementsof the Baron "coincided remarkably well with what I have laid downas belonging to Cannon river.... His account, too, of the mouth of the riveris particularly accurate"; the objection that the Baron says that he navigatedLong r. in November and December, when it is usually frozen, is in partovercome by the fact that it is one of the last to freeze, and the last resort ofthe wild fowl; and while he must convict the Baron of "gross exaggeration ofthe length of the river," of its numerous population, and other pretendedinformation, he would conclude "that if La Hontan’s claims to discoveriesare mere fables, he has had the good fortune or the sagacity to come near thetruth." As this musty old straw has never been threshed over to find anymore grains of wheat in it than Nicollet believed he had garnered, no one elseis likely in the future to make more of it than this; and our alternative seemsto be to accept Nicollet’s results, or noll. pros. the whole case. I incline to theformer, partly from my habitual inclination to account for as many historicalnames as possible, partly because I have so much confidence in Nicollet. Itdoes not seem to have occurred to him that his view of the case would bestrengthened by the original though probably not new suggestion I have made,to the effect that fables of the St. Peter, tacked on to some facts of Cannonr., would explain Lahontan’s Long r.

[I-67] The present town of Redwing or Red Wing, Goodhue Co., Minn., commemoratesthis chieftain, and preserves the site of his village with entireexactitude. Pike’s tabular statement, bound in this work, calls him Talangamane,L’Aile Rouge, and Red Wing; his tribe, Minowa Kantong, Gens du Lac,and People of the Lakes. Beltrami, II. p. 186, makes one Tantangamani"the unnatural father of the unhappy Oholoaïtha." "Major Long arrived onthe evening of the 30th [of June, 1823] at an Indian village, which is underthe direction of Shakea, (the man that paints himself red;) the village hasretained the appellation of Redwing, (aile rouge,) by which this chief wasformerly distinguished," Keating’s Long, I. p. 251, where the name whichPike renders "Talangamane" is given as that of Red Wing’s son, Tatunkamene,and translated Walking Buffalo. "The Redwing chief is, at present[1823], very much superannuated, but he is still much respected on accountof his former distinguished achievements," ibid., p. 260. More about him tocome in Pike, beyond.

[I-68] Frontenac to Red Wing, some 13 miles by present channel, whence it is acouple of miles further to the head of the island opp. Cannon r. camp. Pikecoasts the Minnesota shore till he finishes with the lake at the mouth of Bullard’sor Ida cr., a streamlet that makes in at a town called after the chiefWakouta, Wacouta, Wakuta, etc. Here he enters one of the channels bywhich the Mississippi finds its way into the lake, no doubt the middle one,then as now the main one, which, however, soon joins the south one; thenorth channel is narrower, crookeder, shoaler, and connected with some expansionsknown as Upper and Lower lakes and Goose bay. The town of RedWing is situated on the S. side of a sharp bend the river makes in coming fromthe Cannon, on a plain under bluffs that nearly encompass the town; oneof these is specially notable as the isolated elevation forming a conspicuouslandmark on the very brink of the river. This is Barn bluff, or Barn mountain,so named by tr. of F. La Grange; it is ¾ of a mile long and 345 feetabove low water mark; "upon the highest point of the Grange. Major Long,who ascended it in 1817, observed an artificial mound, whose elevation aboveits base was about five feet," Keating, I. p. 296. Nicollet made the altitude322 feet, with commendable caution; Owen gave 350 feet, almost correctly.This word Grange is often found as Gange: thus Beltrami has in text, p. 189,mountain of the Gange, and Gange r.; latter also on map, and I supposeGanges r. could be found, even at this distance from India. About themouth of Cannon r., opp. Pike’s camp, there was a place called Remnichah;both Nicollet and Owen chart Remnicha r. or cr. as a stream falling in close tothe mouth. While Remnicha or Hhemnicha was a name of Red Wing’s village,it also covered the whole tract from Barn bluff to Cannon r. Mr. A. J. Hill informsme of "a small ravine or coulée which ran through Red Wing’s village,and in 1854, when I lived there, was called the Jordan. It only headed a few blocksback, and is now doubtless a sewer or filled up." So Nicollet’s Remnicha r. isthat now known as Hay cr., above which a certain Spring cr. makes in on the sameside. Present town of Trenton, Pierce Co., Wis., is about a mile above camp.

[I-69] Discovery of the St. Croix r. is commonly attributed to Accault’s party,already mentioned as consisting of himself, Auguelle, and Hennepin, prisonersin the hands of the Sioux at the time. The date is 1680; day in question.According to La Salle’s letter of Aug. 22d, 1682, written at Fort Frontenac,in Margry’s Relations, II. p. 245 seq., it was very shortly after the 22d of April,1680, when the Indians who were carrying them off had come up the Mississippito 8 leagues below the falls of St. Anthony, and then determined to finish theirjourney by land to their village at Mille Lacs. As the St. Croix is more than24 m. below Minneapolis, this party must have passed its mouth about thedate said. The Memoir of Le Sieur Daniel Greysolon Du Luth to the Marquisof Seignelay, 1685 (Archives of the Ministry of the Marine), states that in June,1680, he entered a river 8 leagues from the end of Lake Superior, ascended it,made a half league portage, and fell into "a very fine river," which took him tothe Mississippi r. This was the St. Croix, which Du Luth thus certainlydescended to its mouth at that time. He heard of the captivity of his countrymenwith indignation and surprise, hired a Sioux to show him where they were,and rescued them; he says that he put them in his canoes and carried them toMichelimakinak, whence, after wintering there, they set out for the settlementsMar. 29th, 1681. It is quite possible that before the great triangular duelwhich La Salle, Du Luth, and Hennepin managed to arrange among themselvesover the operations of 1680, the St. Croix was seen by the missionaryMenard, who in 1661 may have reached the Mississippi by way of the St. Croixor some other way, and was soon after lost. Marquette is not in question here, ashe came by the Wisconsin to the Mississippi and went down the latter. So withany other person who reached the Mississippi prior to 1680. Excepting theMenard matter, which is uncertain, the case narrows to Accault’s party andDu Luth, within some weeks of each other, late spring and early summer of1680; the facts appear to be that the former first passed the mouth of the St.Croix, and the latter first descended this river. Hennepin first named the riverR. de Tombeau, Descr. Louis., 1683, map; this is translated Tomb r., as,e. g., Shea’s Hennepin, 1880, p. 199, where we read: "Forty leagues above[Chippewa r.] is a river full of rapids, by which, striking northwest [read N. E.],you can proceed to Lake Condé [L. Superior], as far as Nimissakouat [inMargry Nemitsakouat, in the Nouv. Déc. Nissipikouet, being the Bois Brûlé]river, which empties into that lake. This first river is called Tomb river becausethe Issati [Sioux] left there the body of one of their warriors, killed by a rattlesnake,on whom, according to their custom, I put a blanket." Some translateGrave r. On Franquelin’s map, 1688, the St. Croix is lettered R. de la Magdelaine,though a certain Fort St. Croix appears about its head; by whom it wasfirst called Magdalene r. I am not informed. Lahontan’s map shows nothinghere; he was too full of his fabulous Long r. to concern himself much with realrivers. Next come Lesueur and his people, 1695; he had first reached theMississippi in 1683, and on this his second appearance (his third being in 1700)they built the trading-house called Fort Lesueur on Pelée isl., just below themouth of the St. Croix, as already noted. His editor, so far as this trip is concerned,is the clever carpenter Penicaut, a sensible, fair-and-square man. Justhere comes in the question of the first application of the name St. Croix. Theriver was already so called and the name in use before 1700; thus, NicolasPerrot’s prise de possession, a document dated at Fort St. Antoine, May 8, 1689,mentions the Rivière-Sainte-Croix. The Carte du Canada ou de la NouvelleFrance, par Guillame de L’Isle, Paris, 1703, traces the river and letters it "L.& R. Ste. Croix," i. e., as some have translated it, Lake and River Holy Cross;said lake being, of course, the dilation of the same bottle-nosed river, which issuesfrom a contracted orifice, but is a mile or two wide higher up. But whateverthe theological proclivity to suppose this name to have been given for the usualinstrument of the execution of Roman malefactors, later put by the EmperorConstantine on his banner, and afterward used for other purposes, it is certainthat the Christian crucifix is not directly implied in the name. It is a personaldesignation, connoting one Sainte Croix or Saint Croix, a trader named in LaHarpe’s MSS. of Lesueur’s third voyage as a Frenchman who had been wreckedthere; for we read: "September 16 he [Lesueur] passed on the east a largeriver called Sainte-Croix, because a Frenchman of that name was shipwreckedat its mouth." Hennepin names Sainte Croix as one of six men who deserted LaSalle. A letter written in June, 1684, by Du Luth to Governor De la Barre (whosucceeded Frontenac in 1682), states that the writer had met one Sieur de la Croixand his two companions. This case resembles those of La Crosse r. alreadynoted, and St. Pierre r., noted beyond. It may be summed in the statementthat St. Croix r., St. Pierre r., and Lake Pepin, were all three so named forpersons, by Lesueur or his companions, not earlier than 1683 and not laterthan 1695; best assignable date, 1689. The river has also been called Hohangor Fish r. (cf. Sioux Hogan-wanke-kin). The character of St. Croix’s r. as awaterway to the Great Lakes is elsewhere discussed. This stream now formsthe boundary between Wisconsin and Minnesota from its mouth to beyond 46° N.,where it splits up into small streams in Burnett Co., Wis. Its general course isnot far from S. — it is due S. for many miles before it falls into the Mississippi;which latter, for a great distance above their confluence, has a general bearingS. E. Immediately at the mouth of the St. Croix, on the E., is Prescott, PierceCo., Wis., the site of which was once recommended by Long for a military post;on the W. is Point Douglas, Washington Co., Minn.; and across the Mississippi,a very little higher up, is Hastings, seat of Dakota Co., Minn., at the mouth ofVermilion r. The above-mentioned dilation of the river into Lake St. Croixextends some 30 m. up from its mouth; and as far above this lake as an Indianordinarily paddled his canoe in a day was the long-noted Sioux-Chippewa boundary,at a place which became known as Standing Cedars. Thus the river didduty in Indian politics before it set bounds to our Minnesota and Wisconsin.This lake was often called Lower St. Croix l., in distinction from the sizablebody of water at the head of the river known as Upper St. Croix l. For theroute thence by Burnt r. to Lake Superior, see a note beyond.

[I-70] Especially as it leaves us in the lurch for mileage of the 19th. But wecan easily overhaul him before he gets to St. Paul, which is only 30 river-milesfrom Prescott (mouth of St. Croix r.). He did not go far above thisriver; for he makes it 26½ + 8 = 34½ m. to the Sioux village, which latter wasclose to the present city limits of St. Paul. If we must set a camp for him, itmay be assigned to Hastings, Dakota Co., Minn., 2½ m. above Prescott, PierceCo., Wis., and 18½ m. below Newport, Washington Co., Minn., in the vicinityof which he will camp to-morrow. "Tattoo," at which the blunderbuss wasfired, is not a place, as the context and capitalization might suggest, but a certainmilitary call which is habitually sounded in garrisons and camps in theevening before taps. It marks the hour when the soldiers are supposed toretire to their quarters for their devotions before the lights are put out at taps,and when the officers settle down in earnest for the night’s poker. In approachingthe St. Croix from his camp opposite Cannon r., Pike has bluffs off hisright nearly all the way, and the town of Diamond Bluff, Pierce Co., Wis., isat the point where they first reach to the river, a mile and a half above themouth of Trimbelle r., right, and 11 m. below Prescott. On the left the bluffsare off the river all the way, and for most of this distance Vermilion slough,running under the bluffs, cuts off an island 11 m. long and at its widest near3 m. broad. The lower outlet of the slough is below Trimbelle r.; the middleopening is only 3 m. below Prescott; the upper one is at Hastings. The bottom-landof the principal island has several bodies of water, one of them calledSturgeon l., discharging separately from the main slough; and is traversedlengthwise by a sand-bank 6 m. long, which may be called Lesueur’s Terrace.For this Prairie or Bald isl. is no doubt that formerly known as Isle Pelée, onwhich was built Fort Lesueur, 1695. The middle opening of Vermilion sloughis in common with a lower outlet of Vermilion r. This is Rapid r. of Long, andRivière Jaune of the French; "R. Jaune" appears on Franquelin’s map, 1688.The upper discharge of this river is at Hastings, and thus above the mouth ofthe St. Croix; Lake Isabel is a small sheet between the river and the town.The Minnesota county line between Goodhue and Dakota strikes the Mississippijust 1¼ m. below the lower mouth of Vermilion r. At the mouth of theSt. Croix the Mississippi ceases or rather begins to separate Wisconsin fromMinnesota; so that henceforth Pike proceeds in the latter State.

[I-71] Hastings to Newport, 18½ m. by the channel; camp a mile and a halfbeyond this, vicinity of present Red Rock, Washington Co., at the point onthe small strip of prairie where the Sioux had their celebrated red medicine-stone;this was the "large painted stone" Pike observed. It gave nameto Red Rock, having meanwhile become a historical object. We read in Long,I. p. 287: "a stone which is held in high veneration by the Indians on accountof the red pigment with which it is bedawbed, it is generally called the paintedstone.... It is a fragment of syenite, which is about four and a half feet indiameter.... The Indians frequently offer presents to the Great Spirit nearthis stone," etc. The party found near the stone an eagle’s feather, roots ofPsoralea esculenta, and willow sticks painted red; they secured a fragment ofthe idol for their mineralogical collection. At the time of this visit (1823) therewas an Indian burying-ground a short distance above — in sight from the spot — ifthat place can be called a burying-ground where the bodies are not buriedin the ground but scaffolded in the air; a mode of disposition of the dead whichmight be called hypsitaphy, in distinction from bathytaphy or ordinary undergroundinterment. See Pike’s remarks on Sioux burial on the 21st. To reachthe sacred spot, hallowed by association with the deepest religious emotions ofthe untutored aboriginal mind, Pike left Hastings, where the river was bridgedby the C., M. and St. P. R. R. in 1871 (Act of Minn. Legisl., Feb. 7th, 1867), andsoon passed the site of Nininger, Dakota Co., a small town built at the lowerpoint of a steep bluff which fronts the river’s edge on the S., at the mouth of therivulet which serves as the upper discharge of Lake Rebecca or King l. — in factthe whole bottom on his left is an island 2¾ m. long, extending from Hastingsto Nininger, being cut off by the slough of which King l. is a dilation. Onthe right, in Washington Co., bluffs front the river for a mile or more, tothe lower opening of Boulanger slough, which cuts off an island 2½ m. long.The immediate frontage of the Nininger bluffs on the river is less than a mile,for they recede at the lower opening of Nininger slough. The river thus windsfrom side to side of its bed, with alternation of bluffs and bottom on each side.Above Nininger slough the river makes a great loop to the left; the wholeirregular curve is subtended on the right by Grey Cloud slough, about 4 m. longdirect, and longer by its meanders, thus cutting off Grey Cloud isl., of the samelength, and over 2 m. wide in some places; town site Grey Cloud, WashingtonCo., on the river bank on this island, which also presents at its northern enda limestone rock, 50 to 75 feet above low-water mark, and a mile or more long;this is probably the Medicine Wood of Forsyth, 1819. Near the middle of theloop, on the other side, is the nominis umbra site of Pine Bend, Dakota Co.,where the river runs under the hills. This loop was formerly called Détour dePin or des Pins, whence its modern names Pine bend and Pine turn. The hillsborder the river pretty closely for 5 m. further, to Merrimac, opposite which isan island of the same name; within 1½ m. of this on the right hand, oppositean island of its own name, is Newport, Washington Co.

[I-72] Newport to St. Paul — to a steamboat ldg. about the foot of Wabasha orRobert st. — is 8½ m. by the channel, and considerably more than halfway upto Pike’s camp on the island at the mouth of St. Peter’s or the Minnesota r.Thus, though Pike calls to-day’s voyage "24 miles," it is nearer 14. One whothen swept around the bold bend of the river at St. Paul saw a germ of thatgreat metropolis in the humble Sioux village, though only prescience could havedivined what time would make of the site above it. A later account than Pike’sis given in Keating’s Long’s Exp. of 1823, pub. 1824, I. p. 289: "Passed anIndian village consisting of ten or twelve huts, situated at a handsome turn onthe river, about 10 miles below the mouth of the St. Peter; the village is generallyknown by the name of the Petit Corbeau, or Little Raven, which was theappellation of the father and grandfather of the present chief. He is calledChetanwakoamene (the good sparrow-hunter). The Indians designate this bandby the name of Kapoja, which implies that they are deemed lighter and moreactive than the rest of the nation." This was a band of MdewakantonwanSioux (the Minowa Kantong of Pike), for which, as well as for the celebratedchief himself, see notes beyond. The term which Keating renders Kapoja isnow Kaposia, as a designation of the locality of South Park, a place on the westbank of the river; but the old Sioux village was on the east bank, below Frenchman’sbar, in the low ground formerly called by the French Grand Marais, renderedby Beltrami Great March (for Great Marsh, II. p. 197), and now rejoicingin the epithet of Pig’s Eye marsh or lake. Pig’s Eye was the soubriquet of onePeter Parrant, a whisky-seller who squatted on the bottom in 1838, belowCarver’s Cave in the Dayton bluff. The whole region about the mouth of St.Peter’s r. had been a Sioux focus and stamping-ground for generations beforeany of the localities thereabouts received names from us. The curious origin ofthe name St. Paul for the present capital was in this wise: The limits of themilitary reservation about Fort Snelling were authoritatively fixed in 1839.The whisky-traders, loafers, and squatters about the place became so troublesomethat the U. S. Marshal of Wisconsin was directed to remove all suchintruders, who were given till next spring to decamp; and on May 6th, 1840,the troops were called out to complete the eviction by the destruction of cabins.In the words of E. D. Neill, Minn. Hist. Soc., II. Part 2, 1864, 2d ed. 1881,p. 142: "The squatters then retreated to the nearest point below the militaryreserve, and there they became the inglorious founders of a hamlet, which wasshortly graced with the small Roman Catholic chapel of St. Paul, the name ofwhich is retained by the thrifty capital of Minnesota, which has emerged fromthe groggeries of ’certain lewd fellows of the baser sort.’" The chapel abovementioned was built by Rev. Lucian Galtier, on what is now Catholic block; itfronted on Bench street. It was dedicated Nov. 1st, 1841. The first marriagebans were those of one Vital Guerin, described as "a resident of St. Paul;"and thus the priest named the place as well as the house, although it was alsocalled for a time St. Paul Landing, because some stores had been put up closeby, which caused steamboats to stop there. In 1848, when Minnesota acquiredTerritorial organization, and the capital was fixed at St. Paul, no such placecould be found on ordinary maps; it was some obscure settlement, supposed tobe somewhere about the mouth of St. Peter’s r., or in the vicinity of St.Anthony’s falls, perhaps at a place known as White Rock, or Iminijaska, wheresome bluffs were more easily discernible than any village. Even down to 40years ago, or a little before 1858, when Minnesota acquired statehood, St. Paulhad only replaced tepees with a sprinkling of log cabins; and people scrambledup the bluff by digging their toes into the ground. The site of the city isone which would hardly have been anticipated as such; nor would the originalfeatures of the locality be easily recognized now after all the grading and terracingthat has been done to convert the stubborn hills and intractable hollows intoa beautiful city of over 190,000 inhabitants. But all this was to be, and is wellworth all that it cost. Among the natural features which should be notedin this connection, especially as they have given rise to conflicting historicalstatements, are Carver’s Great Cave in Dayton’s bluff, and Nicollet’s New(Fountain) Cave, halfway thence to Fort Snelling; but for these, as well as fora third cave close to Carver’s, see a note beyond, at date of Apr. 12th, 1806,when Pike’s text brings the matter up.

[I-73] Jean Baptiste Faribault, b. Berthier, Lower Canada, 1774, d. Faribault,Minn., Aug. 20th, 1860, being at the time the oldest white resident of the presentState. Jean Baptiste was the youngest one of 10 children of Bartholomew(who was b. in Paris and came to Canada in 1754); he was in business inQuebec 1790-97, at the latter date entered the employ of J. J. Astor as an agentof the N. W. Co., and was engaged in the Indian trade at various points in theMississippi region for about 50 years, for the most part on his own account.One of the posts he established was at the mouth of the Minnesota r., wherePike found him. In 1814 he married a half-breed daughter of Major Hause(then Superintendent of Indian Affairs), by whom he had eight children. HisIndian name was Chahpahsintay, meaning Beaver Tail. His eldest son, Alexander,founded the present town of Faribault, Minn. Mr. J. B. Faribault"espoused the cause of the U. S. during the war of 1812, and lost many thousanddollars thereby, as well as narrowly escaping with his life on several occasions.He labored all his life to benefit the red man, teach him agriculture andthe arts of industry, and protect his interests. He had an unbounded influenceover them; his advice was never disregarded. He was prominent at all treaties,and rendered the U. S. many valuable services," says J. F. Williams, Minn.Hist. Coll., I. 2d ed. 1872, p. 377: see also ibid., p. 468. An extendedmemoir of Faribault, by General H. H. Sibley, occupies pp. 168-79 of III.of the Minn. Hist. Coll., 1874.

[I-74] The history of the discovery of St. Peter’s r., off the mouth of which Pikeis now camped, is involved in some obscurity, which modern research has notwholly cleared up, though the main facts have probably been certified. (1) Ithas been conceded since Carver’s time that Hennepin missed the river. Discoveryhas not been traced back of Lesueur’s time. Lesueur was first on theMississippi hereabouts in 1683; next in 1695, when he built on Pelée isl., justbelow the St. Croix; and again in 1700; both these rivers are noted in thetreatise of Nicolas Perrot, and before 1700 the river of St. Pierre had been sonamed. (2) Charlevoix’s account, Hist. N. Fr., Paris, 1744, IV. pp. 165, 166, isin substance: In 1700 Lesueur, sent by D’Iberville to establish himself in theSioux country and take possession of a copper-mine que le Sueur y avait découverte,had already discovered there, some time before; ascended St. Peter 40leagues to Rivière Verte (now Blue Earth r.) which comes in on the left hand asyou go up; ascended this Green r. 1 league; built a fort and wintered there,1700-1; in April, "1702," for which read 1701, went up Green r. ¾ league tohis mine and in 22 days got out over 30,000 lbs. of ore, of which 4,000 selectedlbs. were sent to France; there was a mountain of this mineral 10 leagues long,etc. (3) The Amer. Philos. Society’s copy of the MS. of Bénard de la Harpe iscarefully digested by Keating in Long’s Exp., I. pp. 317-322. This MS. is entitled:"Journal historique concernant l’établissement des Français à la Louisianne,tiré des mémoires de Messrs. d’Iberville et de Bienville, etc., par M. Bénardde la Harpe." The original of this copy was in the hands of Dr. Sibley,who certifies to the correctness of the copy in a note annexed, dated Natchitoches,Oct. 29th, 1805. Some of the contents of this MS. are: (a) Lesueur andd’Iberville, with 30 hands, reached the mouth of the Mississippi Dec., 1699.Lesueur was sent there by M. l’Huillier, fermier général, under orders to establishhimself at a place near the sources of the Mississippi, where he had previouslydiscovered a green ore, i. e., in 1695. The substance of the 1695 discovery is:Lesueur built a fort on an island (Isle Pelée, now Prairie isl.) in the Mississippiover 200 m. above the Illinois, by order of Count Frontenac; and the same yearhe went to Montreal with the Chippewa chief Chingouabé and the Sioux chiefTioscaté, the latter the first of his nation that ever was in Canada, and receivedvery kindly by the authorities in view of what they hoped to make out of hiscountry. With this Sioux chief Lesueur had intended to reascend the Mississippiin 1696; but the former died at Montreal after 33 days’ illness. Lesueur,thus released from an obligation to go back with the chief to the country wherehe had discovered the ore, determined to go to France to ask leave to openmines; this voyage he made, and had his permit in 1697. June, 1697, he embarkedat La Rochelle for Canada; was captured by the British on the Newfoundlandbanks and carried to Portsmouth; after peace, returned to Paris fora new commission, which was issued to him in 1698; went to Canada with this;various obstacles threw him back to Europe; and meanwhile part of the menwhom he had left in charge in 1695 abandoned their posts and proceeded toMontreal. Thus operations on the mines were suspended from 1695 to 1700,for Lesueur and d’Iberville, with their 30 workmen, as we have seen, onlyreached the mouth of the Mississippi in Dec., 1699. (b) The MS. we are followingstates, under date of Feb. 10th, 1702, that Lesueur was that day come tothe mouth of the Mississippi with 2000 quintaux of blue and green earth. Thishe certainly had got on his tour of Dec., 1699-Feb., 1702, from and back to themouth of the Mississippi, and he had got it from the mine he opened andworked on Rivière Verte or Blue Earth r., the principal branch of St. Peter’s.The MS. contains a narrative of this tour from July 12th to Dec. 13th, 1700.It appears that Lesueur moved as follows: July 13th, mouth of the Missouri;Sept. 1st, mouth of the Wisconsin; Sept. 14th, mouth of the Chippewa (on oneof whose branches he had found a 60-lb. mass of copper during his previousjourney); same day, Lake Pepin, so designated in the MS.; 16th, passed LaCroix r., so called from a Frenchman wrecked there; 19th, entered St. Peter’sr.; Oct. 1st had ascended this for 44¼ leagues, and then entered Blue r., socalled for the color of the earth on its banks; started an establishment at ormore probably near the mouth of Blue r., at what the MS. gives as lat. 44° 13´N.; Oct. 14th, finished the works, which were named Fort L’Huillier; Oct.26th, went to the mine with three canoes, which he loaded with colored earthtaken from mountains near which were mines of copper, samples of whichL’Huillier had assayed at Paris in 1696. Lesueur wintered there, 1700-1, and,as we have seen, was back to the mouth of the Mississippi Feb. 10th, 1702.(c) From these historical data Keating in Long, 1823, I. p. 320, infers that St.Peter’s and the Blue (Blue Earth) rivers were those streams which Lesueur hadascended in 1695, which date is consequently assigned to the discovery, withoutreference back to 1683. This inference is made "from the circumstance thatthey are mentioned as well known, and not as recently discovered; and moreespecially from the observation of la Harpe, that the eastern Sioux having complainedof the situation of the fort [L’Huillier], which they would have wished tosee at the confluence of the St. Peter and Mississippi, M. le Sueur endeavouredto reconcile them to it. ’He had foreseen,’ says la Harpe, ’that an establishmenton the Blue river would not be agreeable to the eastern Sioux, who arethe rulers of all the other Sioux, because they were the first with whom theFrench traded, and whom they provided with guns; nevertheless, as thisundertaking had not been commenced with the sole view of trading forbeavers, but in order to become thoroughly acquainted with the quality ofthe various mines which he had previously discovered there [italics Keating’s],he replied to the natives that he was sorry he had not been made sooneracquainted with their wishes, &c., but that the advanced state of the seasonprevented his returning to the mouth of the river.’ No mention is madein this narrative of the stream being obstructed with ice, a circumstance which,had it really occurred, would, we think, have been recorded by de la Harpe, whoappears to have been a careful and a curious observer, and who undoubtedlysaw le Sueur’s original narrative." (4) On the foregoing data Nicollet, Rep.1843, p. 18, has some judicious remarks in fixing Lesueur’s locality with precision:"On the left bank of the Mankato [Green, Blue, or Blue Earth r.],six miles from its mouth, in a rocky bluff composed of sandstone and limestone,are found cavities in which the famed blue or green earth, used by the Sioux astheir principal pigment, is obtained. This material is nearly exhausted, and it isnot likely that this is the spot where a Mr. Lesueur (who is mentioned in theNarrative of Major Long’s Second Expedition, as also by Mr. Featherstonhaugh)could, in his third voyage, during the year 1700, have collected his 4000 poundsof copper earth sent by him to France. I have reason to believe that Lesueur’slocation is on the river to which I have affixed his name, and which empties intothe Mankato three-quarters of a league above Fort L’Huillier, built by him andwhere he spent a winter. This location corresponds precisely with thatgiven by Charlevoix, whilst it is totally inapplicable to the former. Herethe blue earth is abundant in the steep and elevated hills at the mouthof this river, which hills form a broken country on the right side of theMankato. Mr. [J. C.] Fremont and myself have verified this fact: he, duringhis visit to Lesueur river; and I, upon the locality designated by Mr. Featherstonhaugh,where the Ndakotahs formerly assembled in great numbersto collect it, but to which they now seldom resort, as it is comparativelyscarce — at least so I was informed by Sleepy-eye, the chief of the Sissitons,who accompanied me during this excursion." (5) Featherstonhaugh’s remarks,Canoe Voyage, etc., I. p. 280 and p. 304, seem to me less judicious than likelyto make the judicious grieve; in fine, they are singularly obtuse to have comefrom so British a man and so clever a story-teller. He heads a page in caps,"The Copper-mine, a Fable;" he has in text, "finding the copper-mine tobe a fable"; again: "that either M. le Sueur’s green cupreous earth had notcorresponded to the expectations he had raised, or that the whole account of itwas to be classed with Baron Lahontan’s" fables, etc. This sort of talk wouldbefog the whole subject, were it not obvious that it has no bearing whateverupon the historico-geographical case we are discussing. The question is whereLesueur went, and when he got there — not at all what he found there. It isobtuse, I say, because unintentionally misleading, for F’gh to say that, when hereached the bluff whence the pigment had been taken, "Le Sueur’s story lostall credit with me, for I instantly saw that it was nothing but a continuation ofthe seam which divided the sandstone from the limestone ... containinga silicate of iron of a blueish-green color." In the first place, F’gh was not atexactly the right spot, which Nicollet has pointed out. Secondly, though Lesueurshould have been mistaken or mendacious about any copper-mine beingin that region — though he should not have collected 30,000 lbs. of ore in 22days, or even a gunny-sack full of anything in a year — though the mountainsshould shrink to bluffs, and the whole commercial features of the case turn intothe physiognomy of the wild-cat — that would not affect the historical and geographicalfacts, viz.: Lesueur ascended the St. Peter’s to the Mankato, and thisas far at least as its first branch, thus exploring both these rivers in 1700. Item,he had been to if not also up the river of St. Pierre in 1695; and it had beenknown since his first voyage in 1683. (6) As to the name Rivière St. Pierre, orde St. Pierre, which we have translated St. Peter, or St. Peter’s r., the formerobscurity of its origin has, I think, been almost entirely cleared up. Keating’sLong, 1824, I. p. 322, has: "We have sought in vain for the origin of thename; we can find no notice of it; it appears to us at present not unlikely thatthe name may have been given by le Sueur in 1795 [slip for 1695], in honor ofM. de St. Pierre Repantigni, to whom La Hontan incidentally alludes (I. p. 136)as being in Canada in 1789 [i. e., 1689]. This person may have accompaniedle Sueur on his expedition." Keating does not cite in this connection theremark of Carver, ed. 1796, p. 35: "Here [at Lake Pepin] I discovered theruins of a French factory, where it is said Captain St. Pierre resided, and carriedon a very great trade with the Naudowessies [Sioux], before the reductionof Canada." This person was Jacques Le Gardeur St. Pierre, who in 1737commanded the fort on Lake Pepin (Fort Beauharnois). One Fort St.Pierre was built at Rainy l. late in 1731; J. Le G. St. Pierre was there in1751: for extended notice of him, see Neill, Macalester Coll. Cont., No. 4,1890, pp. 136-40. His father was Captain Paul St. Pierre, who was sent tothe French post (Maison Françoise) at La Pointe (Chaquamegon bay) in 1718.Nicollet, Rep. 1843, p. 68, cites Carver, and states: "I have no hesitation inassigning its [the name’s] origin to a Canadian by the name of De St. Pierre,who resided for a long time thereabouts." The name appears for the first timein Perrot’s report, of the date 1689, which is also the most probable date ofnaming the St. Croix r. and Lake Pepin. The only question left is, whetherthe river was not named to compliment Pierre Lesueur himself. Whoever theSt. Pierre whose name the river bears may prove to be, the name is a personalone, which we should not have translated into English St. Peter; for it certainlyhas nothing to do with the legendary saint so styled, whose career is connectedwith the crowing of cocks three times more than with the course of any river.Had the stream been named by some priest for such a sadly overworked patronas the apocryphal first Bishop of Rome, we should have heard all about it in theJesuit Relations or elsewhere. (7) The suggestion that the name St. Pierre is aperversion of sans pierres ("without stones"), may be dismissed as too good tobe true; for it is a settled principle of sound philology that the easiest etymologiesare the most likely to have been invented to fit the case, ex post-facto. (8) Asto native names, Nicollet says, l. c.: "The name which the Sioux give to the St.Peter’s river is Mini-sotah; and to St. Peter’s, as a station [Mendota], Mdote-mini-sotah.The adjective sotah is of different translation. The Canadianstranslate it by a pretty equivalent French word, brouillé — perhaps most properlyrendered into English by blear; as, for instance, mini sotah, blear water, orthe entrance of blear water. I have entered into this explanation, because theword sotah really means neither clear nor turbid, as some authors have asserted;its true meaning being readily found in the Sioux expression ishta-sotah, blear-eyed....The Chippeways are more accurate; by them, the St. Peter’s river[is called] Ashkibogi-sibi, the Green Leaf river." It occurs to me that the distinctionNicollet draws would correspond to translucent, as distinguished on theone hand from colorless or transparent water, and on the other from opaque orturbid water. I may also refer to the old medical term, gutta serena, for formingcataract of the eye, when clear vision is obscured by a degree of opacitythat does not entirely exclude light. As applied to water, Sioux sotah may beabout equivalent to Greek — — a — — — — , Latin glaucus, variously rendered "gray,""bluish-green," etc., and Nicollet’s "blear-eyed" be equivalent to what wascalled glaucoma ( — — a — — — µa). Notice what Pike says above of the color of thewater; but it must be added that, when he speaks of the Mississippi as"remarkably red," we must understand only a reddish-yellow hue of itsshoal portions, imparted by its sands; and by "black as ink," only the darkercolor of deeper places where the sands do not show through. The name Mini-sotahas a number of variants: for example, Carver, who wintered on it Nov.,1766-Apr., 1767, has "the River St. Pierre, called by the natives the Waddapawmenesotor";with which compare Watapan Menesota of Long, Watpàmenisothéof Beltrami, and the title of Featherstonhaugh’s diverting book,"A Canoe Voyage up the Minnay Sotor," etc. It has become fixed of lateyears, since an Act of Congress, approved June 19th, 1852 (Stat. at Large, X. p.147), decreed that the noble river should bear the name of the State throughwhich it flows. (9) The Minnesota r. appears on various old maps of Louisiana(not on Hennepin’s, 1683). Franquelin’s, 1688, traces it without any name, butletters it with the name of the Indians, "Les Mascoutens Nadouescioux," i. e.,Sioux of the Prairie, Gens du Large of the French, collectively, as distinguishedfrom Gens du Lac. De L’Isle’s map, 1703, has "R. St. Pierre."

[II-1] The village which Pike visited is marked on his map on the west, upper, orleft bank of the Minnesota r., which here runs little E. of N. into the Mississippi.The hill on the point whence the Sioux saluted him so savagely was thescene of many a more warlike demonstration in after-years; for here was builtFort St. Anthony, later known as Fort Snelling, one of the most important andpermanent military establishments in the United States, and for nearly halfa century the most notable place on the Mississippi above Prairie du Chien. Itwas erected on the land which Pike secured by the transaction his text is aboutto describe, and which extended thence up the river to include the falls of St.Anthony, and thus the site of the present great city of Minneapolis, with St.Paul the twin metropolis of the Northwest. The location of Fort Snelling is inNicollet’s opinion "the finest site on the Mississippi river"; and I should bethe last to dissent from this judgment, after my enjoyable visit to the fort in1873, at the invitation of General Alexander. The bluff headland is about 105feet above the water; the two rivers separated by this rocky point are respectivelyover 300 and nearly 600 feet broad. The height of Pilot Knob, acrossthe Minnesota r., is about 250 feet. The plateau on the point of which the fortis situated stretches indefinitely S. W.; 8 m. direct N. W. are Minneapolis and thefalls. The Mississippi receives the Minnesota at the point of greatest convexityof a deep bend to the S., duplicating that bend to the N. on which St. Paul issituated, the two together forming quite a figure of s. Nothing came of Pike’srecommendation of this site for a military post till a report to the same effectwas made by Major Long, after his expedition of 1817, during which he reachedthe place at 2 p. m., Wednesday, July 16th. On Feb. 10th, 1819, the Secretaryof War, John C. Calhoun, ordered the 5th infantry to proceed to the Mississippiand establish regimental headquarters at the mouth of St. Peter’s r. Adetachment of troops, mustering 98 rank and file, under Colonel Henry Leavenworth,who had become lieutenant-colonel of that regiment Feb. 10th, 1818,was first cantoned at New Hope, near Mendota, Sept. 24th, 1819, and preparationswere begun at once for a permanent structure. The winter of 1819-20was disastrous from scurvy. On May 5th, 1820, camp was shifted to a placenear a spring, above the graveyard, and was thereupon named Camp Coldwater.In the spring of 1820 Jean Baptiste Faribault located himself in the vicinity;Governor Lewis Cass came from his exploration of the upper Mississippi duringthe summer, and Lawrence Taliaferro’s Indian agency was established as CampSt. Peter’s. As usual, the colonel commanding and the Indian agent clashed,notably in the matters of medals and whisky. In August, 1820, Colonel JosiahSnelling, who had become colonel of the regiment June 1st, 1819, arrived andrelieved Colonel Leavenworth of the command. He determined to build onthe point originally selected by Pike. The corner-stone of Fort St. Anthony issupposed to have been laid Sept. 10th, 1820; and the building was so far forwardin the autumn of 1822 that the troops moved in, though it was not completed.It is traditional that a tree on which Pike had cut his name wasordered to be spared in the process of construction; but, if so, it soon disappeared.On May 10th, 1823, the first steamboat, the Virginia, reached thefort. It brought among other notables the Chevalier Beltrami. On July 3d,1823, Major Long arrived, en route to his exploration of St. Peter’s r. In 1824General Winfield Scott visited the fort on a tour of inspection. It does notappear to have struck anybody before that the name of a professional saint ofthe Prince of Peace was absurdly inapplicable to any military establishment.General Scott very sensibly reported that the name was "foreign to all ourassociations," besides being "geographically incorrect," and recommended thepost to be named Fort Snelling, in well-deserved compliment to the distinguishedofficer who had built it. The story of Fort Snelling, from its inceptionto the end of all Indian collisions, is an integral and very prominent part of thehistory of Minnesota; it is an honorable record, of which citizens and soldierymay be equally proud — one replete with stirring scenes and thrilling episodes,which in the lapse of years tradition has delighted to set in all the glamour ofromance. But the most sober historians have found a wealth of material inthe stern actualities of Fort Snelling. The facts in the case need noembellishment. The following are some of the many references that could begiven to the early history of Fort Snelling: Occurrences in and around FortSnelling from 1819 to 1840, E. D. Neill, M. H. C., II. Part 2, 1864; 2d ed.1881, pp. 102-42. Early Days at Fort Snelling, Anon., M. H. C., I. Part 5,1856; 2d ed. 1872, pp. 420-438 (many inaccuracies in dates, etc.). Runningthe Gauntlet, ibid., pp. 439-56, Anon., believed to be by W. J. Snelling,son of Josiah Snelling. Reminiscences of Mrs. Ann Adams, 1821-29, M. H.C., VI. Part 2, 1891, pp. 93-112. Autobiography of Maj. Lawrence Taliaferro,written in 1864, M. H. C., VI. Part 2, pp. 189-255 (specially interesting,as he was Indian agent, 1819-40).

[II-2] Pike’s speech at this memorable conference, the treaty itself, and a longletter which Pike addressed to Wilkinson in this connection on the 23d, 24th,and 25th, formed Docs. Nos. 4 and 5 of the App. to Part 1 of the orig. ed.These are given in full beyond, Chap. V. Arts. 4, 5, and 6, where the text ofthe treaty is subjected to a searching criticism in the light of subsequent events.Here we may conveniently note the names of the chiefs concerned in thetransaction. The best article I have seen upon this subject is that by Dr.Thomas Foster of Duluth, in the St. Paul Daily Democrat of May 4th, 1854,as cited by J. Fletcher Williams in Minn. Hist. Coll., I. 2d ed. 1872, p. 379;this, however, requires some additions and corrections.

1. Little Crow and Little Raven are English equivalents of Petit Corbeau,which latter is a French version of the name of the hereditary chiefs of theKapoja band, borne by successive individuals through several generations.Pike’s Little Crow is said by Long to have been son of Little Crow, who washimself son of Little Crow; and Foster identifies Pike’s Little Crow "as thegrandfather of the present chief, Little Crow," i. e., of one of this name whowas chief in 1854, adding neatly that "he was the Great Crow of all," i. e.,the most celebrated of all those who bore the name. This reference wouldseem to cover five generations, from Pike’s Little Crow backward to his grandfatherand forward to his grandson. Riggs renders Pike’s Little Crow’s nameChatanwakoowamani, Who-walks-pursuing-a-hawk; says that his son’s namewas Wamdetanka, or Big Eagle, who flourished in the thirties; and adds that thedynasty became extinct with Taoyatidoota (or Towaiotadootah), who was theLittle Crow of the Sioux outbreak of 1862. He was a very black crow indeed,this last of the Corvidæ, and was killed by a Mr. Lamson in 1863. Confiningattention now to the one who seems by this reckoning to have been LittleCrow III. of the series I.-V., we find him tabulated by Pike as Chatewaconamini.We have already found him cited by Long as Chetanwakoamene, rendered GoodSparrow Hunter. Beltrami, II. p. 191, presents Chatewaconamani, or theLittle Raven, as the chief in 1823. Featherstonhaugh has a chief he callsTchaypehamonee, or Little Crow, living in 1835. Rev. Dr. Neill has in oneplace Chatonwahtooamany, Petit Corbeau. Dr. Foster gives the Dakota nameas Tchahtanwahkoowahmane, or the Hawk that Chases Walking. Pike’s LittleCrow lived many years after he "touched the quill" (signed his x mark) to thecession, and was in Washington in 1824. Schoolcraft, who held a council withthe Wahpeton Sioux at Fort Snelling, July 25th, 1832, says, Narr., etc., 1834,p. 146: "The aged chief Petite [sic] Corbeau uttered their reply. I recognizedin this chief one of the signers of the grant of land made at this place 26 yearsago, when the site of the fort was first visited by the late General Pike." Thedeath of this good man (in 1834 — ) occurred from a mortal wound he accidentallyinflicted upon himself in drawing his gun from a wagon, at his village ofKaposia. The circumstances are narrated with interesting particulars byGeneral H. H. Sibley, Minn. Hist. Coll., III. 1874, pp. 251-54.

2. The chief here and consistently throughout Pike’s book of 1810 called Filsde Pinchow appears in the 1807 text as Fils de Penichon, Penechon, or Pinechon;but nowhere are we told of whom this eminent individual was the son.The name seems to have been one to conjure with; and our curiosity is excitedto discover Pinchow I., who was such a personage that Pike’s Fils de Pinchow,or Pinchow II., needed no other title to glory. On looking up this subject,I find, first, that "Pinchow," as rendered in the above text, and the threeforms given in the 1807 print, are four variants of a word which isalso written Pinichon, Pinchon, Penition, Pinneshaw, etc., in French orEnglish; and that these are corruptions of a Dakota word. Thus Beltrami,II. p. 207, introduces us to one Tacokoquipesceni, or Panisciowa, as being in1823 chief of the old village on the St. Peter’s, three miles above its mouth.The shorter name which Beltrami uses is obviously the same as Pinchow, etc.,while the longer one he uses is the same as that Takopepeshene of which weread in Keating’s Long, I. p. 385: "Wapasha formerly lived in that [old]village, but having removed from it with the greater part of his warriors, a fewpreferred remaining there, and chose one of their number as a leader. His sonTakopepeshene, (dauntless,) now [1823] rules over them." We read further inKeating’s Long, I. p. 419, of the Nanpashene, or "Dauntless Society," as anassociation of young braves who feared nothing: see further in this matter,Lewis and Clark, ed. 1893, p. 96. So the connection of all these words isobvious, though the genetic relationships of the individuals bearing the name isnot so clear. I suppose that Pike, Beltrami, and Long all refer to one and thesame individual, i. e., to the son of that individual whom the warriors who preferredto remain at the said village chose as their leader. Dr. Foster, as abovecited, says that Pinchon, or Pinichon, etc., was the grandfather of one Good Road,and in his tribe the most noted chief of the eastern Sioux; the name conferredupon this chief being Tahkookeepayshne, or "What is he afraid of — " implyingthe affirmation that he was afraid of nothing. This having been corrupted bythe French to Pinchon, etc., and taken up in English as Pinneshaw, etc., wasreadopted by the Sioux themselves as a common noun, rather than a propername, to designate a very brave man; so that they would speak of such or sucha one as a pinneshaw. Recurring now to the individual whom Pike names Filsde Pinchow, we elsewhere find him listed by Pike under the name of Wyaganage,as a chief of the Gens du Lac and head of the village Pike visited at themouth of the St. Peter’s; this is the Way Ago Enagee whose name appearsabove as that of a signer by his x mark of the grant of land; and such appearsto be the only name by which he became officially known to us. It is spelleddifferently in every one of the several places where I have found it in print orin manuscript; but in no case irrecognizably.

3. We know no more of the Grand Partisan than this name or title. Dr.Foster supposes him to have been only a principal soldier — certainly not a chief.

4. "Le Original Leve" is decidedly original! The queer phrase stands forL’Orignal Levé, given in the text of 1807 as Le Orignal Levé, and thus nearlyright. The individual thus designated is listed on Pike’s tabular exhibit asTahamie, Orignal leve, and Rising Moose; he is also mentioned in Pike’s letterto Wilkinson of Sept. 23d-26th, 1805, as Elan Levie. There is no doubt aboutthe meaning of these phrases; for orignal, orignac, oriniac, orenac, etc., areBasque forms of a name of the moose, which animal, as well as the elk, is alsocalled élan, while levé certainly implies that the animal had arisen, and wasstanding on his legs, not that he was in the act of rising. Dr. Foster evidentlydid not know what the French phrase should be, for he presents Pike’s peculiarcacographies, and is brought to book about it by Mr. Williams; but he givesus some interesting particulars of the chief who bore these names, and Itranscribe his remarks in substance. Tah’amie, L’Orignal Levé, or StandingMoose is believed to be identical with an aged Indian whom most old Minnesotiansknew by the name of Tammahhaw, who had but one eye and alwayswore a stove-pipe hat. He used to boast that he was the only "American"Sioux — by which he meant that in the war of 1812, when the Sioux sided withthe British, and Little Crow and Joseph Reinville led a war-party against theAmericans, he refused to join them and went to St. Louis, where he entered theservice of the Americans in the employ of General William Clark. In 1854 hestill treasured a commission he had received in 1814 (or May 6th, 1816 — ) fromGeneral Clark. Dr. Foster remarks that if there is no mistake in the identity,the friendship Tahamie conceived for Pike stood the test of time, and the twofought together against our common enemies — a fact which our governmentshould not overlook. One Joseph Mojou, an old Canadian of Point Prescott,told Dr. Foster that Tamahaw was called by the voyageurs "Old Priest,"because he was such a talker on all occasions; and Dr. Foster remarks that theSioux word tamwamda, which resembles this Indian’s name, means to vociferate,reiterate, harangue, etc. Mr. E. A. C. Hatch informed Dr. Foster that whenhe traded with the Winnebagoes, and with Wabasha’s band of Sioux, he knewthe Indian and had seen the commission issued by General Clark; also, thatthe Winnebagoes, who were acquainted with this Indian, translated his nameNazeekah in their language — this being their word for the pike, a fish, andtammahhay being the Dakotan word for that fish. According to J. F. Williams,Minn. Hist. Coll., III. 1874, p. 15, Tahama or Tahamie was called by the FrenchLe Bourgne (Borgne), and by the English One-eye, or the One-eyed Sioux, andthat the loss of the eye occurred by accident in a game during his boyhood. Hewas born at Prairie à l’Aile, the present site of Winona, and died in April, 1860,"at least 85 years old, though some who knew him well place his age at nearly100." A daguerreotype likeness of him, procured at Wabasha in 1859 by Hon.C. S. Bryant, is in the possession of the Minnesota Historical Society.

5. "Le Demi Douzen" is not named elsewhere in this book, and does notappear at all in the 1807 edition. If the phrase which represents his namemeans Half Dozen, or Six, it would be better written Demie Douzaine, orDemi-douzaine; but we have seen enough of Pike’s French to be alreadysatisfied that he always saluted the letters of the French alphabet with blankcartridges. The Indian he calls Demi Douzen is thoroughly identified by Dr.Foster as the father of the present (1854) chief Little Six, and the chief of thelarge Sioux village which was situated 28 m. up the St. Peter’s, 3 or 4 m. thisside of the modern Indian village of Shakopee. The father — the one whoattended Pike’s conference — was known as Shahkpay, Half Dozen, and Six;his son as Shahkpaydan, or Little Six, the former being the second of the name,or Six II., and the latter the third of the name, or Six III.; but who was theoriginal Half Dozen, or Six I., founder of this dynasty, we are not informed.Long speaks of Six II. as Shakpa, chief of the village Taoapa; and Forsythcalls this one "Mr. Six, a good-for-nothing fellow."

6. "Le Beccasse" of the above text was a stumbling-block. In the 1807edition the term appears as Le Bucasse. It looks as if it were meant for LaBécasse, meaning Woodcock. But Dr. Foster (whose text as cited by Mr.Williams has Le Boccasse) informs us that the phrase should be written BrasCasse — by which he evidently means Bras Cassé, as he translates Broken Arm.(Pike’s tabular exhibit presents a certain Bras Casse; but this was a Saukchief, otherwise Pockquinike.) Broken Arm’s Sioux name is believed by Dr.Foster to have been Wahkantahpay; "and as late as 1825 he was still livingat his small village of Wahpaykootans, on a lake near the Minnesota [river]some five or six miles below Prairie La Fleche, now Le Sueur."

7. Le B — uf que [qui] Marche, or Walking Buffalo, as we are informed byDr. Foster, was also called Tahtawkahmahnee; "he was a kind of sub-chiefof old Wabashaw (who was not present), being also called Red Wing; and itis from him that the village at the head of Lake Pepin derives its name. Hewas the father [Hancock says uncle] of Wahkootay, the present [1854] oldchieftain of the Red Wing band." Compare note67, p. 69.

[II-3] Outard Blanche, correctly Outarde Blanche, means White Bustard. Thebustard is a very large bird, many species of which inhabit Europe, Asia, andAfrica, but none America. It may, therefore, be well to explain that outardewas a name given by the early French in America to the Canada goose (Berniclacanadensis); but that since this goose is mostly black, the phrase outarde blanchewould rather indicate the snow goose (Chen hyperboreus), which when adultis pure white excepting the tips of the wings. I remember seeing somewherea statement, the source of which I cannot now recall, to the effect that thephrase meant White Buzzard, not White Bustard; in which case the Frenchform would be Busard Blanc. Major Taliaferro speaks of White Buzzard inhis autobiography, as printed in Minn. Hist. Coll., VI. Part 2, 1891, p. 225,p. 234, etc. Major Forsyth calls him White Bustard. However this may be, itis certain that there was a chief of the name of Mahgossau, who was called OldBustard, and for many years known to the whites by the latter designation.For an account of the stabbing of this chief in a whisky-bout, in the summerof 1820, see letter of Lawrence Taliaferro, Indian agent at St. Peters, datedAug. 5th, 1820, in Minn. Hist. Coll., II. Part 2, 1864, 2d ed. 1881, p. 104.

[II-4] Setting camp close to a small stream which falls in on Pike’s left, and whichhas acquired great celebrity for its pretty little water-fall. For this is no otherthan the Minnehaha. It is a wonder Pike missed Minnehaha falls; or that, ifhe was informed of them, he did not take the trouble to go less than a mile upthe stream to see so pretty a spectacle. About 2½ m. from Fort Snelling, onthe road to Minneapolis, the stream spills over the bluff, with as clear a descentas water ordinarily makes from the nozzle of a spout. The picturesque featuresof this place may be imagined, or easily inspected by ordinary tourist travel;the poetical and sentimental are well developed by Longfellow in Hiawatha;the hydrographic are a creek 5 yards wide, falling 43 feet in an unbroken paraboliccurve. This was formerly plain Brown’s cr. and Brown’s fall; Nicolletnamed the stream Cascade cr.; but it will doubtless always be best known bythe name which Longfellow transferred from its original to a new application,to suit the exigencies of verse. This stream is the discharge of Lake Minnetonka.In its course it receives the outlet of a chain of lakes from the W.,called Bass (modern), Calhoun (Nicollet), and Harriet (Nicollet); nearer thefalls is a set of smaller lakes, whose modern names are Diamond, Pearl, Duck,Mother, Amelia, and Rice (latter, the Lake Ann of times when Fort Snellingwas Fort St. Anthony, an expansion of Brown’s cr. itself).

[II-5] The rapids Pike thus ascends to the falls, and the comparative characters ofthe two gorges, of the Mississippi and Minnesota respectively, which unite atFort Snelling, indicate that in prehistoric time the falls were located about theposition of the fort. But there has been no natural recession within the briefhistoric period — merely a momentary flash on the screen of geologic duration.The most marked alteration of the falls that we know of was the accidentalresult of an unintended interference by man. This happened from the burstingof a log-boom. "Behind the boom were thousands of logs two or three feetacross and twelve feet long. These descending by the fall probably acquired avelocity of not less than 64 feet a second, and striking endwise on the débris ofthe hard copping rock pulverized it so that the undermining of the soft sand rockwhich this débris protected went on with great rapidity," Warren, Ex. Doc.No. 57, 1866-7, p. 19. On July 5th, 1880, the Minn. Hist. Soc. celebrated thebi-centennial of the discovery of the falls, and there is no question that they werefirst seen of white men by the two companions of Accault within a few hours ofJuly 5th, 1680, if not by the light of that very day. The occasion was a buffalo-huntdown river from the great Sioux town on Lake Buade (Mille Lacs), when theIndians brought the Picard and the priest (two of their three prisoners) along.The falls were named by Hennepin Sault de St. Antoine de Padoü (so map, 1683)"in gratitude for the favors done me by the Almighty through the intercessionof that great saint whom we had chosen patron and protector of all our enterprises,"as Shea’s tr. Hennep., 1880, p. 200, puts it. What these favors were isnot evident in the light of history; according to Hennepin’s own relation, God’sgracious designs, whatever they may have been, were effectually disconcerted bythe Sioux, who took this slavish son of superstition by the nape of the neck andotherwise subjected him to dire indignities; while as to the monk Anthony,that Franciscan was born at Lisbon, Aug. 15th, 1195, died at Padua, June 13th,1231, and there is not a scintilla of evidence that he did anything whatever subsequentto this latter date. We might laugh off even so glaring an anachronism asa mere theological pleasantry which deceives no one, were it not for the injusticeit does to La Salle, who furnished the sinews of war for Accault’s, Auguelle’s,and Hennepin’s campaign, and was the only person who patronized their trip,saving the said Sioux, who turned it into a personally conducted tour like ourmodern Cook’s. "Saut St. Antoine" appears on Franquelin’s map, 1688. TheSioux called these falls Minirara, the laughing water, whence Minnehaha. InDakotan ira means to laugh, and the reduplicated form irara means to laughmuch or often; but ira is compounded of i, the mouth, and ra, to curl; and inits application to the falls rara, which is simply ra reduplicated, should betranslated curling and not laughing waters. Ungeographical transfer of Minnehahato Brown’s falls is simply poetical license. The Chip. name was Kakabikah,alluding to the severed rock. Hennepin calls the falls "something veryastonishing," indeed "terrible," more suo crasso, and exaggerated the descentof waters to 50 or 60 feet. Carver brings him to book about this, and reducesthe height to 30 feet. Pike’s figures are very close indeed, and his descriptionis the most accurate we had in 1810; Long makes the height practically thesame, but Pike’s breadth of 627 yards was reduced by Say and Calhoun in 1823to 594. In view of these good measurements it is surprising that Schoolcraftelevates the falls to 40 feet perpendicular, and narrows the width to 227 yards.He was a man of great ability and still greater industry, whose acquirementswere extensive and varied; yet he must be taken warily, for there is many aloose screw in his handiwork, and no structure is stronger than its weakest joint.The trouble with Schoolcraft is two-fold; he tried to cover too much ground togo over it thoroughly, and never emerged from the penumbra of that same theologicaloccultation which kept Hennepin’s wits in total eclipse. The naturalbeauty of this cataract was not destined to be a thing of joy forever; one’s emotions,on beholding it now, are those that might be aroused by any mill-tail ofsimilar dimensions. But the new beauty of utility has been conferred by humanskill and ingenuity in utilizing the vast water-power, to which Minneapolismeasurably owes her matchless progress and present opulence; pop. 1870,13,000; 1880, 47,000; 1885, 129,000; now or lately, 220,000; thus surpassingthe 190,000 of her elder sister, St. Paul — in fact becoming the alter ego ofthe wonderful pair. Considering the rapid building up of the fair interurbandistrict, and consequently the absorption of respective suburbs into mutualities,it is logical to infer the complete Siamization of the splendid twins, anda clutch at the laurels of Chicago or New York. By that time such scenes asthe Mississippi has here transferred to the canvas of human art will be shiftedto the Great Falls of the Missouri, where history will repeat itself in anothermagnificent metropolis. Everything begins in watery elements; the force offalling water controls the course of empire; and the conversion of gravitationalpotentialities into electrical potencies realizes dreams of destiny, without theintercession of saints or the interference of God.

[II-6] Decidedly less than this; it is only 18-20 m. by river or rail from Minneapolisto Anoka, which Pike does not reach till to-morrow night; to-day’s campbetween Casey’s isls. and Coon cr., in Anoka Co. if on the right, in HennepinCo. if on the left. The three rapids he passed raised him from 792 to 808 feetabove sea-level; one of them is known as Fridley’s bar, 5 m. above Minneapolis,1½ m. below Durnam’s isl. He had made the usual portage of the falls on theright-hand side (left bank); and soon after decamping this morning he passedon his left Bassett’s cr., which runs through the city, or recently did so — whatdisposition may have since been made of it I do not know. This was formerlycalled Falls cr., as by Nicollet, who maps it in connection with his Lakeof the Isles and two other sheets. Either this or the next above on the sameside is also traced on Pike’s map, without name. This next one is Shingle cr.,called Omini Wakan cr. by Nicollet and by Owen; it comes in on the left a mileor more below Fridley’s bar. Half a mile above Durnam’s isl., and on theright, is Rice or Manomin cr., which Nicollet calls Ottonwey r., and connectswith Mde Wakanton l. Pike also traces this one, but by no name. R. R. stationFridley is near its mouth. (See further under Fridley, in the index.)

[II-7] About 8 m., to Anoka, seat of that county, a logging town of 6,000 pop., atmouth of Rum r. Pike first passed Coon cr., right, and the most difficult rapidshe went up are those named for the same intelligent and ablutionary quadruped,Procyon lotor. Coon or Racoon cr. was formerly known as Peterah cr. Wanyecha(now Elm) cr. falls in on the left, slightly below Rum r. The latter is anotable stream, being the main discharge of Mille Lacs, and as such having acquireda long history. Carver called it Rum r.: "in the little tour I made about theFalls [of St. A.], after traveling 14 m. by the side of the Mississippi, I came to ariver nearly 20 yards wide which ran from the north east, called Rum River," hesays, p. 45, ed. 1796. This was Nov. 19th, 1767, and the river has oftenest beenso designated ever since. But here is a place where the involuntary explorationwhich the Sioux forced on Accault’s party comes in, and the Hennepiniancanonical calendar is obtruded as usual, making the following trouble:

"Eight leagues above St. Anthony of Padua’s falls on the right, you find theriver of the Issati or Nadoussiou [Sioux], with a very narrow mouth, which youcan ascend to the north for about 70 leagues to Lake Buade or of the Issati[Mille Lacs] where it rises. We gave this river the name of St. Francis,"Shea’s Henp., tr. 1880, p. 201. In French the name was R. de St. François:so Henp., map, 1683; on Franquelin’s, 1688, it is "Riviere des Francois ou desSioux," which turns it over from the saint to the French nation, possibly lesssaintly on the whole — that is, unless Franquelin intended to cover St. Francisde Sales, St. Francis d’Assisi, and St. Francis de Paola, or unless des be a mis-engravementfor de S. But Franquelin’s earlier map, 1683 or 1684, has onlyR. des François, which is there connected with R. de la Madelaine (St. Croixr.) by R. du Portage, which latter stands for present Snake r., a branch of theSt. Croix. De L’Isle’s map, 1703, avoids any such question by turning the riverentirely over to the Sioux; he letters R. de Mendeouacanion, i. e., Mdewakantonwanor Gens du Lac. A question affecting the identification of St. Franciswith Rum came up in Carver’s time, and is still mooted. Carver says, ed.cit. p. 45: "Reached the River St. Francis, near 60 miles above the Falls. Tothis river Father Hennipin gave the name," etc. He reached it Nov. 21st,1687. This is the stream next above Rum r. on the same side, now best knownas Elk r. But Pike’s map letters "Leaf R. or St. Francis of Carver & Henepen";Long has it St. Francis r.; even Nicollet gives Wichaniwa or St. Francis.Prof. N. H. Winchell remarks, Hist. Sketch Expl. and Surv. Minn., 4to,p. 15: "On modern maps the name of St. Francis is applied to the next streamabove the Rum, and that may have been the river to which Hennepin referredin his journal, since by a portage the route by it to lake Buade is much less thanthe course by the Rum river, and the Indians may have followed that route." Iquite agree with my friend the professor that the Sioux who took charge ofHennepin’s "explorations," in spite of all the saints on the calendar, may havebrought him that way from Mille Lacs to the Mississippi; but the question isnot by what river he came; the question is, Which river did he call R. de St.François and map by this name — To me Hennepin makes it perfectly clear thathe meant Rum r. Thus he fixes it 8 leagues = 23 — m. above the falls, which ismuch closer to the actual position of Rum r. than such a befogged geographeroften comes; item, he makes his St. François r. come from Mille Lacs, asRum r. does and the other one does not (at least not uninterruptedly); item, hisalternative names, r. of the Issati or Nadoussiou, point directly to Rum r.;item, for a clincher, Hennepin’s map letters R. de St. François precisely alongthe whole course of Rum r. from the Mississippi to Lac Buade, and tracesthe other river too, without any name. You seldom find a case clearer than thisseems to me to be. Carver was simply mistaken in identifying Hennepin’s St.Francis with the other river instead of with his own Rum r.; and this malidentificationon Carver’s part seems to have given later writers an unconscious biasin the wrong direction; Pike makes the same mistake further on in this book.The strongest counter-argument to my view is that I differ with Nicollet in thiscase. It is always unsafe to disagree with that model of caution and precision;but I must venture to do so in this instance. For the rest, add to the synonymsof Rum r. the aboriginal name Iskode Wabo, as given by Nicollet, and thevariants of this phrase; also, R. de l’Eau de Vie of Pike; also, Missayguani-sibiand Brandy r. of Beltrami. F. eau de vie is obviously the explanation of the"Audevies Cr." of Lewis and Clark’s map, 1814, though the stream thusdesignated looks to my eye too low down for Rum r. The source of this riveris noted beyond, where the case of Mille Lacs comes up.

[II-8] The curious word "brelaw," elsewhere "brelau," which we owe to Pike,is a corruption of F. blaireau, badger. This, of course, originally denoted theEuropean badger, Meles taxus, but was easily transferred to the generically andspecifically different American badger, Taxidea americana. Other forms ofsimilar perversity are braro, brarow, brairo, braroca, praro, prarow, etc. SeeL. and C., ed. 1893, p. 64. Pike’s original editor of 1807 had blaireau, correctly,but Pike himself seldom got any F. word or phrase exactly right.

[II-9] Less than this, as Crow r. is not yet passed, though Pike is not much shortof that point. There is little to note: pass Cloquet or Clouquet isl.; camp athead of Goodwin’s isl. or foot of Dayton rapids; a small body of water to theright called L. Itaska, not to be confounded with L. Itasca! At or near themouth of Crow r. Pike leaves both Hennepin and Anoka cos.; he then hasWright on his left and Sherburne on his right. Dayton, Hennepin Co., isat the mouth of Crow r. The crossing there was called Slater’s ferry.

[II-10] What Pierre Rousseau called a "prairie mole" was the pocket-gopher ofthis region, Thomomys talpoides. This was first made known to science by Dr.John Richardson in his paper entitled "Short Characters of a few QuadrupedsProcured on Capt. Franklin’s late Expedition," published in the ZoölogicalJournal, III. No. 12, Jan.-Apr. 1828, pp. 516-520. He named it Cricetustalpoides, taking this specific name from its mole-like appearance, and afterwardscalled it Geomys talpoides, in the Fauna Boreali-Americana, I. 1829,p. 204. Among the peculiarities of the animal, and indeed of the whole familyto which it belongs, are the strictly subterranean habits, and the possession oflarge cheek-pouches external to the mouth and lined with fur inside: seeCoues and Allen, Monographs N. A. Rodentia, 1877, p. 623. The commonmole of the United States, from which Pike saw that this gopher was very different,is Scalops aquaticus, of the mammalian order Insectivora (not Rodentia).

[II-11] To a position about halfway between Elk r., Sherburne Co., and Monticello,Wright Co. — say Baker’s ferry, at head of Dimick’s or Demick’s isl., andcompare note at date of Apr. 9th. On making Dayton rapids Pike passed themouth of Crow r., which falls in on the left above the town and below Dayton isl.This river rises in Green l., Kamdiyohi Co., and by various affluents elsewhere,flows about E. through Meeker and Wright, and then turns N. E., separating thelatter from Hennepin Co. (This must not be confounded with Crow Wing r.,much higher up the Mississippi.) It was discovered by Carver Nov. 20th, 1766,and by him called Goose r. Beltrami chose Rook’s r. Nicollet has Karishon orCrow r. This river needed an ornithologist to keep from mixing up those birdsso! Besides the three bird-names, Beltrami produced Poanagoan-sibi or Sioux r.,as he says it was called by the "Cypowais." Elk River, 41 m. from St. Paul byrail, pop. 1,500, is the seat of Sherburne Co. It is situated immediately belowthe mouth of Elk r. This is the stream charted by Pike with the legend "LeafR. or St. Francis of Carver & Henepen": see for this case note7. Pike alsocalls it R. des Feuilles. Allen had St. Francis or Parallel r. Beltrami saidKapitotigaya-sibi or Double r. Nicollet’s terms Wichaniwa and St. Francisbelong to the main (East) fork of Elk r., now commonly called the St. Francis;he names the other fork Kabitawi (which is the same word that Beltrami uses inanother form). Above Elk River is Otsego, Wright Co., with Orano’s (Jamesonand Wilson) isls. below and Davis isl. above it.

[II-12] To vicinity of Monticello, Wright Co. In the course of the hard waterstemmed to-day are Spring rapids and Battle rapids, each of which Pike marks"Ripple" on his map; the former is first above Dimick’s isl.; the latter is aboveBrown’s isl. and Houghton’s flats; and the name no doubt commemorates theIndian fight of which Pike speaks. The rise represented by the hard water isabout 25 feet, bringing the Expedition up to 898 or 900 feet above sea-level.Nicollet’s Migadiwin cr. falls in on the left, just above Monticello; this is nowknown as Otter cr. Boom isl. is just below the ferry at Monticello.

[II-13] To some obscure point about one-third of the way from Monticello to ClearWater. It is past Lane’s and Cedar isls., and above Cedar rapids, which Pikemarks "Ripple" on his map (the third such mark above his Leaf r.), and belowSilver cr.; but I cannot stick a pin in the map, as there is no named place inthe immediate vicinity; nearest probably R. R. station Lund, Wright Co.

[II-14] Vicinity of Clear Water r., a sizable stream which separates Wright fromStearns Co.; Kawakomik or Clear Water r. of Nicollet; Kawakonuk r. of Owen;Kawanibio-sibi of Beltrami; and qu. Little Lake r. of Carver’s map — Thewhole distance from Monticello to town of Clear Water at the mouth of thisriver is only 19 m., and thence to St. Cloud, 14 m. = 33 m. for which Pike allows12 + 20 + 3 + 16½ = 51½ m. This is over his average excess, and the case iscomplicated by the position assigned for the wintering station of the personsnamed on the 10th. Pike lays down Clear Water r., and his map legends, alittle below this, "Wintering Grounds of Mr. Potier, 1797; & Mr. Dickson,1805-1806." The names do not correspond exactly with the text, and as thewintering ground of the text was not passed till the 10th, when Pike was certainlyabove the Clear Water, this wintering ground is simply legended too lowon the map. Compare Apr. 7th, beyond, when Pike reaches the post of Mr.Dickson and the other person, there called Paulier, in one day’s voyage from hisstockade on Swan r. As there explained, the post in question was only 4 m.below the head of Pike’s Beaver isls., thus in the vicinity of St. Augusta, whilePike’s station of the 8th was at or near Clear Water. To reach this town andriver Pike passes Bear isl., Smiler’s rapids, and on his left two small streams.The lower one of these is Silver cr., coming from a small lake between SilverCreek Siding and a place called Hasty. The upper one of these is Bend cr. ofNicollet (discharge of Fish l.), so named from falling into what was a remarkablebend of the Mississippi, now a cut-off with a large (Boynton’s) island. Thisplace is 3 m. below Clear Water, in Sect. 6, T. 122, R. 26, 5th M.

[II-15] St. Cloud, seat of Stearns Co.; population 8,000; East St. Cloud opp.;bridges; railroads converging by five tracks; rapids of 30,000 horse-power,dammed and utilized. This is a notable place, likely to become more so. Thewhole descent from the upper part of the town of Sauk Rapids to the lowerpart of St. Cloud, a distance of some 5 m., is 24 feet; of which Sauk rapidsproper fall 17 or 18 feet in the course of a mile. Pike camps at the foot ofthese. "Grand Rapids" of the above text are mapped by Pike as "BigRapids," the term also used by Lewis and Clark; they are Nicollet’s Secondrapids. When I last saw the place it was not easy to discern the natural courseof the river, it was so jammed with logging-booms. The "more than 20islands" which Pike passed to-day are in part included in the cluster called theArchipelago by Beltrami, now known as the Thousand isls., smallest and mostnumerous in the expansion of the river just below St. Cloud and above Mosquitorapids; the latter, not bad, are between a large island on the right anda creek that makes in on the left (S. 36, T. 124, R. 28, 5th M.). A short distancebelow these islands, probably not far from Mosquito rapids, and thus somewhere about opposite St. Augusta, was the above-named wintering place.

[II-16] The whole distance by river from St. Cloud to Pike rapids, where he stopsto build his winter-quarters, is only 33 m. He makes this 8 + 12½ + 29 + 17 + 5 = 71½!As there is no possible mistake about the place we have broughthim to, or about that where we shall drop him, an error of over 100 per cent. isevident in the mileage of the 11th-15th. The text gives but one named point(his Clear r.) to consider for the required adjustment; but there are sevendefinite named rivers in this course and several rapids; so that we can checkhim at every few miles, and only need to cut down his mileage a little morethan one-half. Camp of the 11th ("8" = 4 m.) is a little above the mouth ofSauk r. On heading Sauk rapids, Pike passes the town of Sauk Rapids, seatof Benton Co., 75 m. by rail from St. Paul. It is a smaller place than St.Cloud, pop. 1,200, but enjoys the same 30,000 horse-power of the 18 feet tothe mile fall of the Miss. r. Sauk r. falls in from the W., opposite the upper partof the town; Pike elsewhere calls it R. aux Saukes, and maps it as Sack r.; sodoes Long, though he calls the Indians Sakawes and Sakawis: Nicollet’s maphas Osakis r.; other variants of the name are Sac, Sacque, Saque, Sawk, Saukee,Sawkee, Osaukee, Osauki, etc. The most elaborate way of spelling Sauk thatI have found is Sassassaouacotton. The form Ozaukee is adopted by Verwyst,Wis. Hist. Soc., XII. 1892, p. 396, where it is said that this and Sauk are corruptedfrom ozagig, meaning those who live at a river’s mouth.

[II-17] About 6 m., to a position near the mouth of Little Rock r., above Watabrapids and the town of that name in Benton Co. Pike first passes on his right,about a mile from camp, a small stream whose name has not reached me (itempties in the S. W. ¼ of Sect. 15, T. 36, R. 31, 4th M.). In another mile hepasses Little Sauk r., a stream like its namesake, but small. This is calledWatab r. by Nicollet, Owen, and Brower, Wadub r. by Schoolcraft, Wattah r.by Allen. This little river was formerly important as the most tangible part ofthe shadowy Sioux-Chippewa boundary of 1825. Starting from the Chippewar., the line cut across most rivers, at odd places the savages no doubt understood,but geographers never did. It crossed the St. Croix at "Standing Cedars"below the falls, struck near the head of Coon cr., crossed Rum r. at or near itsprincipal forks, hit a "Point of Woods" somewhere, crossed Leaf (Elk) r. lowdown, and reached the Mississippi opp. the mouth of the Little Sauk, whichit followed up, and then went N. W., passed past Swan and Little Elk rivers tothe watershed of the Red River of the North, which it followed approx. N. tothe Otter Tail and Leech l. traverse. (See Allen’s map.) The "narrow rockyplace" passed is Watab rapids, and the town of Watab is just above these, on thecreek to the right, 5 m. above Sauk Rapids. Sauk and Watab are respectively the"2nd" and "3rd" rapids of Nicollet’s map. The word watab means spruce;or, rather, as follows: "The small roots of the spruce tree afford the wattap,with which the bark [of birchen canoes] is sewed; ... Bark, some sparewattap, and gum, are always carried in each canoe," Alex. Henry, Travels,1761-66, N. Y., 8vo, 1809, p. 14. In this matter we also have the support ofthe highest possible authority; for the Century Dictionary, representing theacme of English scholarship, defines watap or watapeh as "the long slenderroots of the white spruce, Picea alba, which are used by canoe-makers in northwesternNorth America for binding together the strips of birch-bark." Cf.Baraga’s Otchipwe Dict., 1880, Pt. 2, p. 404, s. v. watab. Pike charts Watabrapids; his map, place marked "Ripple," first above his "Little Sack R."This is where his boat sprung a leak, and he did not get much further.

[II-18] Say about 14 m., to a position between Platte r. and Spunk r. Soon afterdecamping, Pike passed a river he does not mention above, but which he elsewherenames Lake r., and maps conspicuously in connection with a certainsmall sheet of water he names Elk l. These are now known as Little Rockr. and Little Rock l. The stream is laid down by Nicollet with the additionalname of Pikwabic r. It falls into a remarkable horseshoe bend of the river,which has not cut off an island since the charts I use were drawn. Oppositethis bend there is a place called Brockway, in Stearns Co. Of Clear r. as above,and also so charted by Pike, Lewis and Clark, and Allen, Pike elsewhere saysthat it "is a beautiful little stream, of about 80 yards in width, and heads insome swamps and small lakes on which the Sauteaux of Lower Red Cedar Lakeand Sandy Lake frequently come to hunt." It is Pekushino r. of Nicollet,Bekozino-sibi and Pines Tail r. of Beltrami, now commonly called Platte r., andoccasionally Flat r., as on an 1850 map of Minnesota before me; it heads in theregion about Mille Lacs. At the place where the railroad crosses Platte or Clearr. is Royalton, in Bellevue township, Morrison Co. One-third of a mile belowits mouth is the line between Stearns and Morrison cos., on first section-lineabove town-line 126-7. One of the two rivers here noted is Cold r. of Carver,1767; but I am uncertain which one. McNeal’s ferry over the Mississippi isabout a mile below the mouth of the Platte.

[II-19] Making the requisite adjustment of this, we set Pike down in the N. E. ¼of Sect. 29, T. 128, R. 29, 5th M.; this will give us 3 m. to fill the bill of the"five" to-morrow. To-day’s itinerary furnishes some nice points which wemust determine with precision — not for their intrinsic importance, but for theirsignificance in connection with Pike’s winter-quarters. The matter must beattended to here, though the text has not a word about it. But Pike elsewherespeaks of three creeks along here, above his Clear r.=Platte, and below his Pinecr.=Swan r., near which he builds his stockade. Pike’s map has four, on theleft, beginning above Clear r.: (1) Wolf cr.; (2) a creek; (3) Buffalo cr.; (4)Rocky cr. — all names of his own, none used now. Proceeding up from Platte=Clearr., we have on the left in succession: (1) Spunk r., whose mouth is inthe S. E. ¼ of Sect. 22, T. 127, R. 29, 5th M. This is the Wolf cr. of Pike’s,item of Lewis and Clark’s map, 1814; mapped, no name, Allen; Zakatagana-sibiof Beltrami; Sagatagon or Spunk r. of Nicollet; Spunk brook of various maps. The native name which we have translated means some sort of touchwoodor punk, which may be more plentiful hereabouts than elsewhere, or of better quality. (2) A rivulet for which I can find no name, not even on thelocal maps, and which is too insignificant to appear at all on most maps; Pike’straces it without name. I will call it Maple brook, because it falls in behindMaple isl., in Sect. 17 of the T., R., and M. last said. Maple isl. is sizable, andlocally well known; either this or the little round one close by is probably Beltrami’s"Island of the Sun." (3) Two Rivers, or Two r., or Twin r., as thenext stream is called, which empties about the center of Sect. 8 of the same T.,R., and M., hardly a mile above Maple brook. This is the one Pike maps by thename of Buffalo cr.; it is also Buffaloe cr. of Lewis and Clark’s map; and theKanizotygoga of Beltrami. This is a sizable stream, giving name to Two RiversTownship, and does not fall in behind any island. (4) Little Two Rivers, orTwo Rivers brook, which falls in about half a mile higher up, in the sameSection, behind an island. (5) A nameless and utterly insignificant brook, whichfalls in at McDougal’s eddy, behind an island, in the S. E. ¼ of Sect. 5 of thesame T., R., and M. I find it correctly laid down on a Morrison Co. map, ona scale of 2 inches to the mile; but it does not appear on the inch-to-mile chartsI mostly follow. (6) Hay cr., which most maps run into Little Two Rivers,but which is quite distinct, with the brook (5) intervening. Hay cr. comessouthward along the E. border of Swan River township, turns S. E. acrossSect. 31 of T. 128, R. 29, thence enters Sect. 5 of T. 127, R. 29, and falls intothe Mississippi behind the three-cornered isl. which there lies opp. some rapidsnext above McDougal’s eddy. The only question seems to be, whether Pike’sRocky cr. is Little Two Rivers or Hay cr.; but after pretty close scrutiny ofthe country thereabouts, I incline to decide in favor of Little Two Rivers, andcould give various reasons for this identification. Pike maps four rapids, inquick succession, above his Rocky cr. Two of these I suppose to be those nowknown as Blanchard’s and McDougal’s, both passed on the 14th; a third issurmounted on the 15th, but the fourth finishes Pike’s boat-voyage: see nextnote.

[II-20] Three miles, to camp at the foot of Knife or Pike rapids, W. side of theMississippi, about the S. border of Sect. 7, T. 128, R. 29, 5th M. Theseare the 4th or Knife rapids of Nicollet, apparently so called from the narrownessof the two channels into which the river is divided for most of theirextent by an island, which is what Pike’s text above means by the "two narrowshoots." The designation of Pike rapids is not recent; it occurs on the Allenmap pub. 1834, and no doubt this antedates the time that the next creek aboveSwan r. was named Pike cr., and the township next above Swan River townshipwas named Pike Creek township. The ascent is 10 or 11 feet to the mouth ofSwan r.; and this is 4 m. below the city of Little Falls. Little Falls is givenas 115 m. by the river from Minneapolis, and as 105 m. by rail from St. Paul(N. P. R. R.). We know where Pike sleeps to-night within a few rods, andshall be able to locate his stockade with a "probable error" of no yards, feet,or inches.

[II-21] "Lieut. Pikes, Block House or Post, for the Winter 1805-1806" islegended on the pub. map, and marked by a zigzag line snug up under his Pinecr. (now Swan r.). The orig. MS. map, now on file in the Engineer Office ofthe War Dept., is large enough to show the exact spot, on which is delineated astockade 36 feet square, with a blockhouse on the N. W. and another on theS. E. corner of the structure. Notwithstanding such precise indicia, the sitehas been vaguely stated by various authors, and even shifted down to Two Riversby so careful and usually correct a writer as my friend the Hon. J. V. Brower,who is clearly in error in stating that "the south branch of Two Rivers wasnamed Pine creek, and the other Second creek," Minn. Hist. Coll., VII., MississippiR. and its Source, 8vo., Minneapolis, 1893, p. 126. This is simply anobiter dictum, by inadvertence. I had satisfied myself of the true site within afew rods, when I first learned from Prof. N. H. Winchell, State Geologist ofMinnesota, that traces of the building had been discovered by Judge NathanRichardson, Mayor of Little Falls, Minn. On writing to this gentleman, I received a prompt reply, as follows:

Little Falls, Minn., Feb. 24th, 1894.

Elliott Coues, Esq., Washington, D. C.

My Dear Sir: Yours of the 21st inst. is received making inquiry about mydiscovering the location of a fort built by Zebulon M. Pike in the fall of 1805.The location is on the West bank of the Mississippi River on Government Subdivisiondescribed as Lot No. 1, Sec. No. 7, in Township No. 128 North, ofRange No. 29 West, of the 5th Principal Meridian, near the S. E. corner ofsaid Lot No. 1, and near 80 rods south from the mouth of Swan river and fourmiles south of this city. I settled at this place in 1855. I wrote a history ofthis county in 1876. Then in 1880 I revised it. Before writing the revision in1880 I looked over the books in our State Historical Society, where I found anaccount of Pike’s Expedition up into this region of country that year. Hisdescription of the location was so plain and explicit that I had no trouble infinding it. At that time there were no logs or timber left. The place wasplainly marked by a pile of stone, about the size of an ordinary haycock, of whichthe chimney or fire-place was built. The fort was built of logs. The bottomlayer was imbedded about one-half their size into the ground when built. Thegroove in the earth showed very plain when I first visited the place. As nearas I could judge the building was 40 feet square. Built just on the brink of aslight elevation, as described by Mr. Pike in his narrative. Afterward inspeaking about the location of Pike’s Fort to an old settler, Samuel Lee, nowresiding at Long Prairie in this State, he told me that he had been at the placemany years before, and when he was first at the place the bottom tier of logswere still there. I visited the spot two years ago for the purpose of getting oneof the stones that were used to build the fire-place, and took one that will weighabout 75 pounds, which I am keeping as a relic. The pile of stone is gettingscattered about; the ground has never been cleared and broken up, but is usedas a pasture. Unless something durable is put up soon to mark the location alltrace of it will be obliterated. This country commenced to settle with farmersin 1850, and has become quite well settled up. I will say before closing thatthe rapids at the foot of which he built the fort bear the name of Pike rapids, sonamed in honor of him. I will send you a copy of our extra paper [DailyTranscript, of Little Falls], issued the 1st of January. If I have omitted anythingthat you may wish to know write me again.

Yours very respectfully,
[Signed]    N. Richardson.

Judge Richardson is entitled to the credit of recovering and making known thespot in modern times. The Hist. Up. Miss. Vall., pub. Minneap. 1881, treatingMorrison Co. in Chap. cxxxviii, has on p. 586 a short notice of the location,presumably upon Judge Richardson’s data, as the publishers’ preface makesgeneral acknowledgments of indebtedness to him. In Oct., 1886, the place wasvisited by Mr. T. H. Lewis, at the instance of Mr. A. J. Hill of St. Paul, andthrough the friendly attentions of the latter I am put in possession of extractsand tracings from Mr. Lewis’ notebook, made on the spot at the date said,when he found the extant remains. Mr. Lewis identified the site upon his ownobservations, not being at the time informed of the earlier discovery. So interestinga spot should be permanently marked before all traces of it are obliterated,and I hope Judge Richardson will interest himself to see that this is done.It need not be an expensive or elaborate monument; probably the stones of theold chimney and fire-place, now scattered about, would answer the purpose ifthey were solidly piled up.

Postscript.Little Falls, Minn., Sept. 8th, 1894. — I have this day visited the spot in person, accompanied by Judge Richardson and Mrs. Coues. We have piled up the rocks in a conspicuous heap. I do not recognize any trace of theoriginal woodwork, or of the ground-plan of the structure, except the place ofthe chimney; but the site is unquestionable. To reach it, you go down themain road from Little Falls, about 4 m. along the W. side of the Miss. r.,crossing Pike cr. and next Swan r.; a few rods beyond the latter, turn to the leftinto Simon Kurtzman’s cornfield, through bars, and keep on due E. to theriver. You will see the cairn we have made in the following position: Sect.7, T. 128, R. 29, 5th M., in S. E. corner of Lot No. 1, 80 rods E. of SimonKurtzman’s house, about 80 rods S. S. E. of the mouth of Swan r., near the E.border of the cornfield, 30 paces back from the brink of the Mississippi, 50yards S. by E. of a lone pine tree 50 feet high, on a flat piece of high groundin a copse of scattered scrub oaks, overgrown with brush and weeds. Letteron the subject over my signature in Little Falls Daily Transcript, Sept. 10,1894, urging the erection of a monument.

[II-22] Or windshake — not that the canoe foundered in the wind, but that there was a flaw in the wood of which it was built, such unsoundness of timber being called a wind shock or windshake.

[II-23] For Dickson’s trading-house of 1805-6 see note beyond, date of Apr. 7th.Dickson’s name frequently recurs in Pike, but I think never once in full.Robert Dickson was an Englishman who began to trade with the Sioux asearly as 1790, and acquired great renown in the early history of the country.The following occurs in Minn. Hist. Coll., I. 2d ed. 1872, p. 390: "Five yearsafter Pike’s visit he espoused the British cause, and took a prominent part inencouraging the western tribes in hostility against the Americans. Yet he issaid to have been very humane to American prisoners, rescuing many from theIndians, and restraining the latter from barbarities and cold-blooded massacres.After the war Dickson, some accounts say, did not resume trade with the Sioux;but he did at least live at Lake Travers as late as 1817, and was charged withalienating the Sioux from the United States, in complicity with Lord Selkirk,who was there establishing his colony on Red river. He was soon after arrestednear what is now St. Paul, and taken to St. Louis. He was probably soon released,however, and found his way back to Queenstown in Canada, where hedied. Dickson had a Sioux wife and four half-breed children. One of hisgrandchildren was wife of Joseph Laframboise, a well-known trader at Lac QuiParle." To this may be added that one of Col. Robert Dickson’s half-breedsons was William Dickson, whose name appears here and there in Minnesotaannals.

[II-24] There is no such French word as "killeur," which Pike elsewhere renders"killieu," and which appears in the text of 1807 as "killien" and "killein."On consulting the F. text, I. p. 95, I find that the editor says, "Plutôt tueurrouge, car le mot killeur n’est pas françois; c’est sans doute un barbarisme échappéà M. Pike." The son of this chief Pike calls "Fils de Killeur Rouge": seeMar. 5th and 8th, 1806, beyond. There is a Canadian French word pilleur,pillager, and the Leech Lake Chippewas were known as Pilleurs or Pillagers;but this Killeur was a Sioux chief of the Gens des Feuilles or Leaf Indians, nowcalled Wahpetonwans: see L. and C., ed. 1893, p. 100. Pike translates Killeurby "Eagle"; and this clew to the meaning of the word is carried on by Beltrami,II. p. 207, who has a chief called "Ki-han or Red Quilliou"; ibid.,p. 224, he speaks of "a bird which the Canadians call killiou, and the IndiansWamendi-hi"; ibid., p. 307, he says "a plume of killow," making an Englishword of it. Forsyth has "the killiew (thus named from a species of eagle)," inMinn. Hist. Col., III. 1874, p. 154. So killeur, etc., is simply a French wayof spelling a certain Indian name of the eagle, whose feathers are used forornament. I once noted this word in the form khoya. Riggs’ Dak. Dict.,1852, has " — u-yá, n., the common eagle" (the dotted h a deep surd guttural).

[II-25] Yanktons and Sissetons: see L. and C., ed. 1893, pp. 94, 100.

[II-26] More probably Chien Blanc, or White Dog — unless we could go so far as tosuppose he was called by the less polite and less appropriate name of ChienneBlanche.

[II-27] About opp. the mouth of Pine cr. or Swan r., ½ m. above head of Roberts’isl., and on or near the present site of Gregory, Morrison Co. This place is marked as Aitkin’s ferry, trading-post, and hotel, on a Minnesota map, pub.Phila., Cowperthwait, 1850; it is about the middle of the southwesternmostsection of Little Falls township (Township 40, Range 32, 4th mer.), say 3 m.below the middle of the city of Little Falls. The head of Pike rapids is 1,071or 1,072 feet above sea-level. Swan r. bends up a little to fall into the Miss.r., so that its mouth is slightly over the S. border of Sect. 6, Township 128,Range 29, 5th mer. There is a flour mill on its S. side, at the bend, half amile or less from its mouth. Ledoux P. O. is on this stream, a few miles up,in Swan River township, which lies between North Prairie township andPike Creek township; Swan r. runs over the N. border of it a mile W. ofthe Mississippi. By whom Pike’s Pine cr. was first called Swan r. I do notknow, unless it was Nicollet; it is Wabizio-sibi of Beltrami, Wabezi or Swanr. of Nicollet, 1836, Swan r. of Owen and later writers; but Lieut. Allenhas it Elk r. on his map, by error.

[II-28] Less than this, to camp on left or E. bank of the Mississippi, in the presentcity of Little Falls, Morrison Co., probably about the place where is the lower bridge, a few blocks from the Buckman hotel. Painted Rock rapids isnow Little falls. A high, small island at the falls divides the river in twochannels; it is Rock isl. of Nicollet, now called Mill isl.; some mills are there,and there is the site of the present dam, immediately below the lower bridge.Little Falls is a flourishing place, as towns with a water-power of 35,000 horsesmay easily be; pop. now or lately 3,000; dam built 1887-8, said to have cost$250,000; two bridges span the river, the upper one for the N. P. R. R., nearthe large sawmill which stands on the W. bank; chief industry, milling flourand logs; city incorporated 1889; N. Richardson, mayor for five years: seeLittle Falls Daily Transcript, Industrial ed., Jan. 1st, 1894, large folio, pp. 28,maps and views, price 5c. The Little falls — cataract, not town — are so calledby Pike elsewhere in this work; he also says that "the place is called by theFrench Le Shute de la Roche Peinture," by which we may understand La Chutede la Roche Peinte; his map legends "Painted Rock or Little Falls." Beltraminames the falls Great Rock and Kekebicaugé. As to the "5 miles" ofto-day’s journey, we may note that the distance is less now than it used to beby the channel, because there was a bend of the river to the E. which is nowstraightened out. This bend appears on maps of 20 years ago; it is now cityground, and the march of improvement has effected various other changes in thecourse of the river. When about a mile from this morning’s camp, Pike passeda place where the river was fordable, and may be so still; here was the site ofSwan River P. O., on the E. bank, in Little Falls township. When a mile furtheron, he passed the mouth of a creek from the W. which he calls 2nd cr. (onthe map "2d Cr."), and which others have rendered Second cr., though Nicolletand Owen both have it Little Fall cr.; it is now known as Pike cr., andgives name to Pike Creek township. It falls into the Mississippi at the middleof the E. border of Sect. 25, Township 129, Range 30, 5th mer., throughthe 6th one of the 16 outlots of O. O. Searles, slightly beyond present citylimits.

[II-29] To a position at the head of Little Elk rapids, a short distance above the mouth of Little Elk r. This is a sizable stream which comes from the W.through Parker and Randall townships to the S. W. corner of Green Prairietownship, touches the N. E. corner of Pike creek township, and then curves acouple of miles to the Mississippi through Sects. 6 and 5, T. 129, R. 29,5th M. Pike elsewhere notes it with particularity by the name of Elk r. Beltramisays Moska or Mosko and Doe or Bitch r. This last name is a mistakenrendering of R. la Biche or Elk r. of the French — he makes the same singularblunder in the case of Lake Itasca, which he calls Doe or Bitch l., after theFrench Lac la Biche. The river is the Omoshkos or Elk r. of Nicolletand Owen. It is marked Little Fork cr. on the Minn. map of 1850; andAllen’s map makes it Swan r., by an erroneous transposition of names; seenote27 p. 122.

[II-30] From Little Falls to Crow Wing is only 26 m. by the river. Pike doesnot reach Crow Wing till the 21st, and his party does not get up till the 23dor 24th. Exactly what distance he makes it cannot be said, as mileage ismissing some days. He appears to have thought it some 50 or 60 m. Thusthe itinerary does not afford data for fixing camps with precision, and hence wecan only check him approximately from day to day. The sledge-party does notaverage 3 m. a day, but Pike himself seems to skirmish about for many moremiles — perhaps the excessive mileages represent his own activities, not the actualadvance of the Expedition. The average course is due N. On the 12th Conradishoal and Belle Prairie were passed, to camp in the vicinity of Fletcher cr.Belle Prairie is a comparatively old settlement on the E. bank, founded byFrederick Ayer, a missionary, in 1848; pop. 800. This is only 4½ m. by railfrom Little Falls. The town is directly opposite the shoals. These are theFifth rapid of Nicollet. A small creek comes in opposite them from the W.,in Green Prairie township. Fletcher cr. is mapped by Nicollet without name;it is McKinney’s r. on the 1850 map of Minn. It falls in from the E. throughSect. 1, T. 41, R. 32, 4th M.

[II-31] In the vicinity of Topeka, a town and station on the N. P. R. R., on the E. bank of the river.

[II-32] Camp of the 14th, 15th, and 16th seems to have been on the W. bank ofthe river, at the head of Olmsted’s bar, and was very likely opp. the point of land in Sect. 15, T. 42, R. 32, 4th M., where one Baker located histrading-house in 1831. It is formally named Pine camp when it is passed onthe way down, Mar. 4th, 1806: see that date. Olmsted’s bar is the Sixth rapidof Nicollet, at a place where the river expands and contains a cluster of smallislands, called The Sirens by Beltrami, II. p. 466.

[II-33] This cache was in the vicinity of present Fort Ripley. The town now socalled is on the E. side; railroad; pop. 500. Old Fort Ripley itself ison the W. side, a mile off; some of the buildings still stand. This post, oranother in the same place, was once called Fort Gaines; Prairie Percée of the F.intersected the river a little below. The fort is in the N. E. ¼ of Sect. 7, T.131, R. 29, 5th M., about a half mile below the mouth of Nokasippi r., whichfalls in from the E. through Sect. 27, T. 43, R. 32, 4th M. This is aconsiderable stream: Nokasippi and Noka Sipi of Schoolcraft; Nokay r. ofNicollet and of Owen; Nokasele on one of my maps, Nankesele and Nankeleon others; Woco-sibi of Beltrami’s text, II. p. 466, Wokeosiby and Prophet r.on his map. This hint that the name is a personal one is correct. Noka wasa Chippewa, the grandfather of White Fisher or Waubojeeg. "It is from thisold warrior and stalwart hunter, who fearlessly passed his summers on the stringof lakes which form the head of the No-ka river, which empties into the Mississippinearly opposite present site of Fort Ripley, that the name of this streamis derived," says W. W. Warren, Minn. Hist. Coll., V. 1885, p. 266. It ismapped by Pike and mentioned by him beyond at date of Mar. 3d, 1806; buthe has no name for it. Allen’s map gives it as Long r. But the earliest nameof the stream I can discover is on Lewis and Clark’s map, pub. 1814, where itis called Scrub Oak r., no doubt from the prairie above it, to which Pike gavethat name. On reaching ownline 42-3, Pike leaves Morrison for Crow WingCo., on the right, but still has the former on his left, up to Crow Wing r.

[II-34] To some point probably more than halfway between the Nokasippi andCrow Wing rivers, perhaps not far from the station or siding Albion (St. PaulDiv. of N. P. R. R.). It is beyond Lenox, and a little above that creek forwhich I find no name, but which falls in from the W. through Sect. 24, T. 132,R. 30, 5th M.

[II-35] To a position immediately below the mouth of the Crow Wing r.

[II-36] Rivière à l’Aile de Corbeau of the F., usually shortened into R. de Corbeau,though Eng. Crow Wing r. reflects the full name. The large island at its mouthwas called Isle or — — le de Corbeau, and I suspect that the similarity of aile andisle or île may be concerned in this nomenclature. The river sometimes appearsas Crow r., rendering the shorter F. form; in such instance it must not be confoundedwith Crow r. much lower down the Mississippi: see note11, p. 97.Crow Wing also appears as Crow-wing, and I have found both Cow-wing andCrowing r. in Schoolcraft. Raven r. is another name; Pike sometimes usesthis. Beltrami has Raven’s Plume r. and Crow Feather r. Nicollet calls itKagiwan r. This is the largest branch of the Mississippi above Little Falls.The unnumbered affluents which unite to compose the main stream head inlakes and marshes of Hubbard, Becker, Otter Tail, Wadena, and Todd cos.Having received most of its tributaries, and coursed through Wadena, the riverfor a short distance separates Todd from Cass Co., and then runs between Cassand Morrison to empty opp. the town of Crow Wing. Crow Wing r. was importantas a means of communication between the Mississippi and Red River ofthe North. It was navigated up to the mouth of R. des Feuilles, now Leaf r., inthe S. part of Wadena Co.; thence the route was up Leaf r., and by portageinto Otter Tail l., one of the principal sources of Red r. waters. Crow Wing r.was also a route to Leech l. Schoolcraft made the trip this way from Leech l.to the Miss. r. in July, 1832; his map, pub. 1834, letters some of the mainbranches Kioshk r., Longprairie or Warwater r., and Leaf r. The chain oflakes on this route are in his nomenclature as follows, from below upward:1. Kaichibo Sagitowa; 2. Johnston’s; 3. Allen’s; 4. Longrice (Long Rice);5. Summit; 6. Vieux Desert; 7. Ossowa; 8. Plé; 9. Birth; 10. Little Vermillion;11. Kaginogumag, source of the river. Four small ones thence toLeech l. are called Lake of the Island, Lake of the Mountain, Little Longl., and Warpool l. The branch which Schoolcraft calls Kíosh is Nicollet’sGayashk r., now called Gull r.; a lake on it has the same name, and one higherup is Lake Sibley of Nicollet. Nicollet says that he contracted Gayashk fromChip. Kagayashkensikang, "the place where there are little gulls [terns],"Rep. 1843, p. 54. Gull r. comes from the N., approx. parallel with the Mississippi,and falls into Crow Wing r. only some 3 or 4 m. above its mouth; aboutthe same distance up it is crossed by the N. P. R. R., at or near Gull Riverstation (between Baxter and Sylvan Lake stations).

[II-37] This seems to bring the whole party up to Crow Wing isl., opp. old town ofCrow Wing. Pike says himself that he could scarcely make his notes intelligible, but we certainly know where he is to-day, and have probably checked himfrom Little Falls with all the accuracy the case admits. The town was mainlyin Sect. 24, T. 44, R. 32, 4th M., but settlements in 1857 were in Sect. 23;pop. in 1866, 600; Brainerd killed the place about 1870: see Harper’s Mag.,XIX. 1859, p. 47. Thos. Cowperthwait’s map of Minn., Phila., 1850, letters"Morrison’s" on the town site.

[II-38] "Hard W." is a misprint for N., the general course of the river as youascend, for many miles, till the Crow Wing is reached; after this the Mississippi bears N. E.; and as the Crow Wing comes in from the W., and is verylarge, their confluence is, as it were, the forks of the Mississippi.

[II-39] The whole way by river from Crow Wing to Pine r. (the next place wherewe can certainly check Pike), is only 34 m. He makes it 10½ + 3 + 3 + 10 +12 + 21 + 12 = 71½ m., with something over for morning of Dec. 31st. Hencewe have to cut him down about half. His "10½" m. takes him about 6 m.toward Brainerd, with nothing to note on the way, excepting a small creekon the left hand, in Sect. 26, T. 133, R. 29, 5th M. From Crow Wing toBrainerd is 11¼ m. by the river; Crow Wing Co. continues on the right;on the left is Cass Co., according to such a presumably authoritative mapas that of the G. L. O., 1893; but in fact Crow Wing Co. also extends on theleft-hand side of the Mississippi from a point about 1½ m. above the mouth ofCrow Wing r. upward for many miles, its W. border being along the middleline of R. 29.

[II-40] To Brainerd, Crow Wing Co., called City of the Pines, now easily first in thispart of the State; pop. 10,000; junction of St. Paul div. with main N. P. R. R.,136 m. from St. Paul by rail, 114 from Duluth; recent utilization of the fallof the river furnishing perhaps 20,000 horse-power; water-works, electric lights,etc. It is a center of the lumber interests, and a focus of roads from everydirection; the river is bridged, and the surplus population forms West Brainerd.Brainerd was laid out by the railroad in 1870, and has no earlier history.

[II-41] Beyond Rice r. or cr., Nagajika cr. of Nicollet, which falls in on the right,in Sect. 18, T. 45, R. 30, 4th M., about 3 m. above Brainerd, and is to be distinguished from another of the same name higher up on the same side; also,past French rapids, the Seventh of Nicollet, which were Pike’s carrying-placesto-day. Above these he found the river frozen solid.

[II-42] Vicinity of Sand cr., from the right. This is mapped by Nicollet, but without name. It falls in through Sect. 27, T. 46, R. 30, 4th M.; directly opposite its mouth is a smaller creek, from the left.

[II-43] To a position at or near the stream called White Bear-skin r. by the geologist D. Norwood, 1847, being the discharge of Duck l. and Swamp l., two of thelargest of the numerous small lakes that lie close along this course of the river.They are close together; each is about 2 m. long and at one point only a mileor so to the left of the river. Lake Taliaferro of Nicollet is on this connection,but further off. Pike is fairly within the great lacustrine region of Minnesota,where there are more lakes than have ever been counted. Half Moon l.is a little one, about half a mile below the discharge of Duck and Swamp lakes.The most notable point Pike passes to-day is the mouth of Rabbit r., on theright. This is a considerable stream discharging from a set of lakes (one atleast of which has the same name), at the junction of Sects. 13 and 24, T.46, R. 30, 4th M., at or near the foot of Island rapids. A smaller creek, alsofrom the right, empties below, in Sect. 24. Higher up are some rapids calledBig Eddy.

[II-44] Nearly to the mouth of Pine r. (not to be confounded with Pike’s Pine cr.,now Swan r.): see next note. The new species of pine "called the French sappine," is the balsam-fir, Abies balsamea. Pike meant to say "called by theFrench sapin." The text of 1807, p. 31, has "Sappine."

[II-45] Present name of the largest stream in the northern portion of Crow WingCo., falling in from the N. in the S. W. ¼ of Sect. 25, T. 136, R. 27,5th M., at a sharp bend the Mississippi here makes. Pine r. has been socalled by pretty nearly all writers since Pike’s time; but Beltrami has it Singuoakoor Pines r. It is connected directly, or indirectly, with an immense numberof small lakes, not all of which have ever been counted, and still fewernamed. Two of the largest are called Whitefish and Pelican. This wholesystem of waters lies to the N. and W. of the Mississippi, S. of Leech lake,and on Pike’s left as he ascends. It offered a means of communication withLeech lake much more direct than the course of the Mississippi itself; this wastaken by Pike on his return journey, and the river is consequently to be particularlynoted in that connection: see under dates of Feb. 19th-24th, beyond.

[II-46] Curly Head does not appear in Pike’s tabular exhibit of Chippewa chiefs,and we are left without his native name, or any fair identification; but Hon.W. W. Warren supplies the requisite data, Minn. Hist. Coll., V. 1885, p. 47,p. 348 seq., p. 366; see also ibid. p. 469 seq. and p. 495. The name of theold civil and military chief Babesigaundibay is inseparably linked with thehistory of his tribe. He belonged to the Businause family, or Crane totem, andruled for many years over the Chippewas of the Mississippi r., in the vicinityof Gayashk or Gull l., eventually becoming the third man in importance inthe councils of his nation, sharing honors with Broken Tooth of Sandy l. andFlat Mouth of Leech l. His people increased in numbers, held the CrowWing region against all enemies, and in 1852 numbered about 600. Curly Headwas respected and beloved; "he was a father to his people; they looked onhim as children do to a parent; and his lightest wish was immediately performed.His lodge was ever full of meat, to which the hungry and destitutewere ever welcome. The traders vied with one another who should treat himbest, and the presents which he received at their hands he always distributed tohis people without reserve." This estimable man died on his way back fromthe grand conference held at Prairie du Chien by Governors William Clark andLewis Cass, Aug. 19th, 1825. His signature to this treaty, as printed in one ofthe copies before me, is "Babaseekeendase, Curling Hair." I elsewhere findBabikesundeba. Curly Head died childless; on his death-bed he called two ofhis pipe-bearers and formally constituted them his successors. These werebrothers; one was Songukumigor, Strong Ground, and the other Pugonakeshig,or Hole in the Day I. The latter exerted great influence for about a quarter ofa century, killed 36 people, and was killed by being bounced out of a cartwhile drunk, near Platte r., Benton Co., Minn., early in 1847.

[II-47] No mileage from Dec. 31st, 1805, to Jan. 3d, 1806: so we must check Pikeby other data. From Pine r. to town of Aitkin, Aitkin Co., is 32½ m. byriver; this is very tortuous; air-line distance between these points, 16¼ m., orjust one-half of the river-miles. At 12 of these direct miles’ distance abovePine r. and 4¼ below Aitkin is our most important datum-point, viz., mouthof Lower Red Cedar r. This is the discharge of Lower Red Cedar l., a comparativelylarge body of water 6 m. to the right (nearly S. from the mouth ofL. R. C. r.). On the shore of L. R. C. l., half a mile E. S. E. of the place wherethe river issues from it, was the post of the N. W. Co., whence the party thatmet Pike on the 2d came to see what was up, and to which Pike repairs as Mr.Grant’s guest on the 3d. While it is true that these facts do not fix the threecamps with all desirable precision, they enable us to carry Pike on by "rule ofthumb" in an intelligible manner. I propose, therefore, to set him one-thirdof the way from Pine r. to Lower Red Cedar r. on the 31st of Dec. — say opp.Rabbit l.; two-thirds of this way on the 1st of Jan. — some point between Dean cr. and Hay cr., both of which fall in on the left (probably a mile aboveDean cr. — see Feb. 24th, beyond); at mouth of Lower Red Cedar r., Jan. 2d;at Aitkin Jan. 3d — to reach which Little Willow r., flowing S. from Waukenaboand Esquagamau lakes, is passed. These stages cannot in any event be far outof the way; and to so make them brings up all the points worth noting betweenPine r. and Aitkin in orderly sequence. The principal ones are the lake andthe town. The lake has been well known since the days of the old Frenchrégime; its relations with Mille Lacs are intimate, and it was thus of consequencein connection with old canoe-routes; it was for many years also the situation ofimportant trading-posts. It was le Bas Lac aux Cèdres Rouges of the French,Lower Red Cedar l., in distinction from another one of similar name, nowCass l. The distinction is to be sedulously borne in mind, especially as Pikemost often ignores it formally, and repeatedly speaks of "Red Cedar" or"Cedar" l. indifferently, meaning the present one when he is hereabouts,and meaning Cass l. when he is thereabouts; the name is also now commonlyclipped down to Cedar l. and Cedar r. or cr., meaning this one, in moderngeographies and guide-books. Lower Red Cedar l. is large, with perhaps 50 m.of shore-line altogether; it bears from Aitkin in the direction of Brainerd;some of its relations are with smaller bodies of water known as Crystal l., Mudl., Spirit l., Hanging Kettle l., Pine l., Farm Island l., and Sesabagomag l.Cedar Lake station is about 5 m. W. of Aitkin, N. P. R. R. Aitkin is perschedule by rail 27 m. from Brainerd, 87 m. from Duluth; population 1,000;for persons named Aitkin (not Aiken or Aitken), see that word in the Index.The present town is on the right hand going up, left or S. side of the Mississippi,at the mouth of Mud or Muddy r. (Ripple cr.), a considerable stream,connected with a system of small lakes. It falls into the Mississippi in Sect.1, T. 47, R. 27, 4th M.; and in this same section is the mouth of a streamwhich Owen called Sesabagomag r., but which I find given as Missagony r. onlate maps. Nicollet charted it, with no name. Below the mouth of LowerRed Cedar r. Pike goes from Crow Wing into Aitkin Co. He had passed thecounty line Jan. 3d.

[II-48] "Point" as a measure of distance is not a well-known term, and I am not sure of what it means. There is some internal evidence in Pike that one of his"points" was from — to ¼ to ½ m., according to the nature of the groundand the degree of "that tired feeling" which is liable to overcome the mostpushing wayfarer. I imagine "point" to correspond to the pause or pose of thevoyageurs. In their language a piece was a package of any goods, made up toweigh from 50 to 100 lbs., supposed to weigh about 90 on an average, for convenienceof transportation over portages. Such a pack would be slung on theshoulders by the fillet or forehead strap; and the voyageur would start offat a dog-trot and drop it when he got tired. This stop or rest was the pose;the Chip. name was opuggiddiwanan, lit. the place of putting down the pack.Pike had to the last degree the first qualification of a traveler — "go"; peoplewho lack plenty of that should stay at home. That he was a prudent orjudicious traveler can hardly be said; he must have been a terrible fellow topush, merciless on his men, and especially on himself. He took all thechances per aspera, when some of the roughest things might have beensmoothed or avoided had his foresight been as good as his hindsight. He blewup things with gunpowder once, and it is a wonder he was not blown up on the4th, instead of being only burnt out. He missed very few of the accidents thatthe spirits of fire, air, earth, and water could conspire to throw in his way; andhis faithless sergeant made away with all the spirits he had in the keg atSwan r. However, he got through all right, and got his men all through too — siciter ad astra.

[II-49] The direct distance from Aitkin to the site of the N. W. Co. house, at least1 m. S. of the outlet of Sandy l., is about 24 m.; the river is also pretty directas a whole, between these two places; but it is extremely tortuous in its manyminor bends of a mile or two apiece, so that the distance the sledges traveledon the ice may have been twice as far as that by the way Pike and Bradleyforged ahead. These two reached Mr. Grant’s house on the night of the 8th;the men with the sledges, not till evening of the 13th. The two sets of campsmight be arbitrarily set along this lap, by ignoring such wild figures as "27miles" for the 5th, and assuming other data. But this would probably not helpus to a better understanding of this section of the route than the followingnotes: 1. Less than a mile above the mouth of Mud r. (Aitkin) a stream fallsin on the right; this is Missagony r., marked Sesabagomag r. on Owen’s map.2. Rice r. (Manomin r. of Nicollet’s map) falls in on the right, 4½ m. inan air-line above the mouth of Mud r., in Sect. 4, T. 47, R. 26, 4th M.3. Willow r. falls in on the left, 6 m. in an air-line above the mouth ofRice r., in Sect. 2, T. 48, R. 26, 4th M. This is to be particularly noted inconnection with Pike’s journey, as he proceeds approximately by way of thisriver from Sandy l. to Grand Rapids in the vicinity of Pokegama falls. It isthe largest tributary of the Mississippi on that side between Pine r. and theLeech Lake branch of the Mississippi. Pike charts it by the name of Pike r. — nothis own name, as Beltrami implies, II. p. 446, but that of the pike, a fish,translating F. Rivière du Brochet; it is also Pike r. of Long’s map; it wascalled Alder r. by Cass and Meaogeo r. by Beltrami; but it is now alwaysknown as Willow r. Its system of lakes is also in close relation with those E.and S. E. of Leech l., and the river was thus one of the recognized routes betweenthis lake and the Mississippi. Its mouth is about one-third of the directdistance between Aitkin and Sandy lake. 4. There are some rapids aboveWillow r., two of them called Moose and Sandy Lake rapids; the latter areonly about 2½ m. direct W. from the lake, but fully 6 m. by the bendsof the river; the town of Portage is near them. Pike and Bradley left the riverat some point below these rapids, to make straight for the lake. 5. Sandy l.,Lac au Sable or de Sable of the French, is close to the river, on the righthand going up, and discharges into the Mississippi by a short crooked streamcalled Sandy Lake r., 2 m. or less in length. Its greatest diameter in anydirection is probably under 5 m., but the figure is so irregular, with suchextensive projections into the main body of waters, that the actual shore-lineis more than 30 m. It receives the discharges of a number of smaller lakesin the vicinity, among them one called Aitkin by Nicollet. Its principalfeeders are two in number. One of these comes in at the southernmost end ofthe lake, and takes the name of Sandy, Sandy Lake, or Rice Lake r. TheN. P. R. R. crosses this stream near McGregor, which is 12 m. by thewagon-road southward from the discharge of the lake. This river has a mainbranch from Manomin or Rice l.; and either this branch or the whole river isthe Menomeny-sibi or Wild Oats r. of Beltrami. The other main affluent ofSandy l. comes in from the E., at a point on the E. shore in the N. E. ¼ ofSect. 9, T. 49, R. 23, 4th M., and is generally known as Prairie r. Nicolletcalled it Little Prairie r.; Long, Savanna r. Its main branch from the N. E. isnow known as Savanna r.; Nicollet called this West Savannah r. to distinguish itfrom that branch of the St. Louis r. which he designated East Savannah r., andaccentuate the relations of the two. For it must be known that these rivers ofthe Mississippian basin connect so closely with certain branches of the St.Louis, in the Lake Superior basin, that they were formerly of the utmost importanceas waterways between the two great systems, and as such were greatlyused by the early voyageurs. The N. W. Co. house where Pike was entertainedstood on the W. shore of Sandy l., next to the Mississippi. Pike marksthe site on his map, and gives it as 1¼ m. S. of the discharge of the lake intothe short thoroughfare by which this reaches the Mississippi. There are existingremains of old settlements in various positions further south. A trail fromthe Indian village struck the Mississippi r. in the S. E. ¼ of Sect. 4, T. 49,R. 24. When David Thompson was here in 1798, he made the fort to be lat.46° 46´ 39´´ N., long. 93° 20´ W. It was a point of commercial and even politicalimportance long before Pike’s day — it was such at the pivotal date, 1763, in thehistory of French-English occupancy of the Upper Mississippi. At the dischargeof the lake into the Mississippi on the N. side, in the center of Sect. 25, T. 50,R. 24, is a small sharp point; this was the site of a post of the Amer. Fur Co.of which Schoolcraft speaks in 1832; Palmburg was and Libby is there now.It would be a pity if the government dam now constructing on the outlet shouldconvert this beautiful sheet of water into such a dismal cesspool as Lake Winnibigoshishhas become since that was dammed; but lumberjacks prevail innorthern Minnesota by a large majority, and logging-booms have nothing incommon with scenic effects.

[II-50] In the summer of 1802, the Morrison party, consisting of William Morrison, the brothers Michael and Antoine Cheniers, John McBean, one Bouvin,and one Grignon, came into the country in the service of the X. Y. Co. (Richardson& Co.), in opposition to the N. W. Co. The genuine Morrison letterelsewhere cited, in connection with the discovery of the Mississippian source,says: "I found ... Sayers at Leech Lake, Cotton at Fond du Lac, andBousquai at Sandy Lake." The latter is no doubt Pike’s "Charles Brusky."The name stands Bousky in Pike’s text of 1807, p. 34. The Rev. Mr. Neill,Minn. Hist. Coll., V. 1885, p. 451, speaks of the visit of David Thompson, May6th, 1798, to Sandy Lake, adding, "where the post was in charge of Mr. Bruské"(Bruske in the index).

[II-51] See note49, p. 137, for Willow r. Pike calls it "Leech Lake river" in this place, not because that was then or ever has been its name, but because it wason the route he was going to take from Sandy l. to Leech l. He flatters ourintelligence further by giving us a perfectly blind snow-shoe trail, for the mostpart ’cross lots, without a single compass-point, with wild mileage or none,and not even a geographical hint, from the 20th to the 26th. He takes it forgranted that we know all about the swamps of N. Minnesota in midwinter.Luckily, we are not without the means of bringing him to book. He continueson the Willow River route toward Leech l. with his whole party till the morningof the 26th, when he leaves the party to follow up that route, and goes himselfwith Boley and the Indian to Mr. Grant’s house "on the Mississippi." TheMississippi is a pretty long river, but it happens that we can discover where Mr.Grant’s was in 1805: see Pike’s map, place marked "N. W. Co.", on theright bank (W. side) of the river, a little below the place marked "Ripple."This was directly opposite the present town of Grand Rapids, Itasca Co., 3 m.below Pokegama Falls. The air-line distance from the outlet of Sandy l.to Grand Rapids is supposed to be 32 — m.; by the way Pike went perhaps40-45 m. The course is about N. N. W. This cuts off a considerable segmentfrom the winding course of the Mississippi, which makes a large elbow eastward.Pike subtends this bend; having crossed the Mississippi near Sandy l.,and thus continued across what he calls the "portage" to Willow r., hegoes up this, not far from parallel with the Mississippi, till Willow r. bearsmore to the left; when he leaves it to continue his course to Mr. Grant’s house,having the Mississippi on his right, but at several (say 5 to 10) miles’ distance,representing the amount of cut-off he makes. On the 26th, with Boley and anIndian, he forges ahead of his party, who do not get up to Grant’s house tillthe evening of the 28th, though he is there on the night of the 26th with theIndian, and Boley comes up on the morning of the 27th. That section of theMississippi which Pike thus avoids may be passed over briefly, as it offers littleof interest. There are some rapids above Sandy l. Three of these are dulycharted by Nicollet, being his lower, middle, and upper "Small" rapids,respectively now known as Ox-portage, Crooked, and Pine rapids. The first ofthese are in Sect. 2, T. 50, R. 24, 4th M.: the others in the next townshipabove, of the same range. By far the most important tributary of the Mississippiin this portion of its course is Swan r., which falls in from the E. in Sect.9, T. 52, R. 24, 4th M., 1¼ m. (direct) south of the boundary line betweenAitkin and Itasca cos., which here runs on the line between T. 52 and T.53. The Duluth and Winnipeg R. R. from Duluth meanders the St. Louis r.as far as Floodwood, continues N. W. to Wawana, along some tributaries ofFloodwood r., to the divide between Laurentian and Mississippian waters in thevicinity of Swan r. The latter is marked "Wild Swan R." on the U. S. Engineers’chart — which is well enough, as all the swans in that country are wild,though this name apparently arose from misunderstanding the legend "W. SwanR." on Nicollet’s map. This stands for West — not Wild — Swan r., and Nicolletmeant by it to contrast this stream with that tributary of the St. Louis whichhe called East Swan r. At a distance of 6½ air-line miles, but fully 14 m.by the meanders of the Mississippi, above the mouth of Swan r., a small streamcomes in from the W., nearly if not exactly on the common corner of Sects. 21,22, 27 and 28 of T. 53, R. 24, 4th M. This is Split Hand r. — the Cut Handcr. of Nicollet and of Owen, draining from a lake of the same incisive name,from Willibob l., and some others, all of which lie southeastward of thelarge Lake Pokegama. This is the stream called by Beltrami Singonki-sibi orMarten r. Above Split Hand r. are several streams on either hand. The onewhich I take to be Nicollet’s Blueberry cr. falls in from the E. in the S. W. ¼of Sect. 21, T. 54, R. 24, 4th M., ¾ of a mile due S. of a considerable hill inthe next section above, and 3 m. due E. of Hale l. — that little lake which is atthe tip of the longest eastward finger of Lake Pokegama. Ascending the Mississippistill, we next come to Trout r. or cr., from the E., whose mouth falls inthe S. W. ¼ of Sect. 5 of the township just said. This has held its presentname since the days of Schoolcraft and Allen, though Beltrami called itNamago-sibi. Here we are already approaching Grand Rapids, where we shallfind Pike: for the many important features of that vicinity see next note.

[II-52] I do not know that the exact site of Grant’s N. W. Co. House has been recovered of late years; but there is no question of its location nearly or directly opposite the town of Grand Rapids, somewhere in the S. ½ of Sect. 21, T. 55,R. 25, 4th M. It doubtless stood on the first rising ground from the river — mostprobably, as I think, on the knoll that overlooks that curious expansion ofthe Mississippi into a pair of ponds or one small lake of hour-glass shape, acrossthe constricted part of which the river flows. Grand Rapids is the seat ofItasca Co., and has become quite a town of late years, at least in comparisonwith any others for many miles thereabouts. It stands across the mouth of asmall creek, whose name, if it have one, I could not learn, even when I was onthe spot. It discharges from several small lakes. The rapids from which thetown takes its name are not particularly "grand." Pike calls them a "ripple.""Kakabikons (or simply Kabikons) rapids, as I have laid them down on the map,have a fall of 9 feet in a distance of 80 yards," Nicollet, Rep. 1843, p. 63. The volatile Beltrami calls them "Sassicy-Woenne, or Thundering Rapids," II. p. 455.The Engineer chart marks the rapids 1247 below and 1252 above — a differenceof only 5 feet. At the direct distance of 2½ m. below (E. S. E. of) the town is avillage called La Prairie, of no consequence in itself, but occupying a notable place.This is the mouth of a comparatively large river, charted by Pike as "MeadowR. navigable for Bark Canoes 100 M." Long also maps it as Meadow r.; byBeltrami it is called Mushkotensoi-sibi or Prairie r., and this last is its presentdesignation (duplicating the name of one of the tributaries of Sandy l.: seenote49, p. 138). It is the translation of the Indian word which Nicollet in thisconnection renders Mashkudens, and which occurs in many forms, as Mascouten,Muscatine, etc. About 2 m. S. W. of Grand Rapids is Horseshoe l., one ofthe many small bodies of water which hover like satellites about Lake Pokegama:see next note. The D. and W. R. R. keeps on the N. side of theMississippi, from La Prairie through Grand Rapids to Cohasset and Deer River,its present terminus.

[II-53] Jan. 29th and 30th are not entered in the diary, and there is intrinsic evidence of confusion in Pike’s notes. Observe the statement made under "Feb.1st" that Pike reached Leech l. at 2.30 p. m., crossed it to the house andarrived there about 3 p. m. — 12 m. in about half an hour, an obvious impossibility.Observe also that Boley was his only soldier according to Jan. 26th and27th; but that Miller was the man with him on the 28th and later days. Whatbecame of Boley and where did Miller come from — We have not a word aboutthe main party; in fact we are never told by what route they reached Leech l. — simplythat they got there five days after Pike, at 4 p. m., Feb. 6th: see thatdate. Fortunately the early text of 1807, pp. 37-40, clears the whole matterup, as follows: "After the whole party had arrived at this lodge [Grant’s house,evening of Jan. 28th], Mr. Pike determined to proceed on to the head of theriver [Leech l.], accompanied by one of his young men, named Miller. Heleft the camp on the morning of the 29th, when it was snowing very fast," etc.,reached Pokegama falls at 1 p. m.; soon after found three deserted Chippewalodges, and "a fine parcel of split wood"; cut down three balsam-firs to makea shelter, and camped. Jan. 30th, passed through the "dismal cypressswamp," found Mr. Grant’s cut-off and reached the inhospitable Chippewas,who were living at or near White Oak pt. (All this is given on the 28th inthe above text; this is where the break was made, though there is no break inthe week-days, for the entry "Tuesday, Jan. 28th," covers that day, Wednesday29th, and Thursday 30th, as shown by what I have bracketed in the text.) Jan.31st, Pike and Miller continued on from White Oak pt. and went past themouth of the Leech Lake fork to some point on that fork, described above as"one mile below [i. e. beyond] the traverse of the meadow," in the 1807 textas "a mile above the meadow"; camped there. Feb. 1st, reached Leech l."a little after midday," p. 39 of the 1807 text, agreeing with 2.30 p. m. of abovetext well enough; across the lake it was "12 miles" to the establishment of theNorth West Company, at which they arrived about ten o’clock in the evening."The gates were locked," etc., p. 40.

[II-54] Pike has now (Jan. 29th and 30th) gone up the Mississippi from Grand Rapids to White Oak pt. — not following the river exactly, but taking thecut-off Mr. Grant marked for him. The air-line distance is about 13 m. Supposinghim to have taken something like the usual trail, he went as follows:At 3 m. direct above Grand Rapids, 4 m. by the river, he passed Pokegamafalls at 1 p. m., Jan. 29th. This is a place where the Mississippi drops about15 feet over a granular quartz ridge: Pike maps it "Falls of Pakagama 20 Ft.Portage 200 yards." It is naturally one of the best known points on the river inthis vicinity. It is visible in part from the car window as you go by on the railroad,but the dam which has been built just above is a more conspicuous objectfrom that point of view. Nicollet calls the cataract Kabikons or Little falls,and more fully Kakabikons or Little-severed Rock falls. At 3¼ m. by theriver, above these falls, is the discharge of Lake Pokegama itself. This isby far the largest body of water in the vicinity, having an extreme length of13 m.; but its form is so irregular, something like a hand with spread-out fingers,that its actual shore-line is very much greater; and a number of smaller sheets of water are dotted about it on all sides. Two of the largest of these are Sisibakwetand Rice lakes. Nicollet renders Pakegomag, "a name applied by theChippeways to all sheets of water in the vicinity of a river," Rep. 1843, p. 63.Schoolcraft says Peckagama, Allen Pecagama, Owen Pokegoma; Packegamau,and I suppose a dozen more forms of the word, are found; Beltrami has Pakegamanaguenor Hook l.; the form I use seems to be most frequent now. Theaccent is on the antepenult — Pokeg´-ama. A mile or so below the mouth ofthis lake Bass brook falls in from the north, discharging from Bass and otherlakes; the town of Cohasset is at its mouth. The trail now crosses, or latelydid cross, the Mississippi from S. E. to N. W. in this vicinity. It continueswestward, past two overflows of the river known as Backwater and Cut-off lakes,respectively, on one side and the other of the Mississippi, continues to a smalllake which I suppose to be one of those so said by Pike above, and then strikesfor the larger lake he speaks of. This traverse leaves the Mississippi severalmiles to the left as you go west; for the river makes an extensive sharp bend S.,and there receives Vermilion r. (Wanomon r. on Nicollet’s map) from the S., atthe bight of this bend. Exactly 2¼ m. below the mouth of Vermilion r. is thedischarge of Lake Kabukasagetewa (as the name is rendered on the Warner andFoote map). The "large lake" of the above text is evidently that known to thevoyageurs as Lac aux Chênes, whence our Oak l., also White Oak l.; from thehead of which to Pointe aux Chênes, now Oak pt. or White Oak pt. (Red-oakPoint, Nic., p. 63), is exactly 2½ m. This is clearly the place where the goodSamaritan Chippewa and his amiable family resided, close by the mouth ofDeer r., which Pike charts by this name, and which is still so called. This fallsin from the N. through another White Oak l., also called Deer, also Stephen’s.Notice that this last (Deer r.) is the stream Beltrami erroneously calls Onomonikana-sibior Vermilion r., as he fetches it in on the N., both in text and on hismap.

Addendum to the above. I found when at Deer River that the nomenclature ofthe natives does not agree with that on our best maps regarding the lake to be called"White Oak." The first White Oak l. of the above note, and of all our modernmaps — the one which Pike comes to before he reaches White Oak pt. — is asmall one 1½ — — ¾ m., lying chiefly in Sects. 3 and 10 of T. 55, R. 27, 4th M.,and through it goes one but not the other of the two courses into which the Mississippiis here widely divided. The people never call this White Oak l., butapply that name to the much larger one through which Deer r. discharges aboveWhite Oak pt. — the Deer l. of Nicollet, Stephen’s lake of our maps. This is apear-shaped body of water 2¾ m. in extreme length, with a greatest breadth ofover a mile at its lower end. It lies mainly in Sects. 1, 2, and 12 of T. 144,R. 25, 5th M., but with the butt end overrunning into T. 56, R. 27, 4th M.,and both the inlet and the outlet of Deer r. being in the latter township. It isthus entirely off Pike’s trail, N. and W. of White Oak pt. This lake dischargesinto a loop of the Mississippi by a short thoroughfare of ½ a mile, ending closeabove White Oak pt., in the N. E. ¼ of Sect. 13, T. 144, R. 25, 5th M. Themiserable hamlet of Deer River — as vile a place as it was ever my bad luck todiscover — lies W. of Deer r., and a mile or more N. of White Oak l. Hereis the terminus of the D. and W. R. R., a siding of which runs down to the lakeat a point ½ a mile W. of the inlet of Deer r., where a pier is built. On crossingthe lake to get into and go up the Mississippi the usual route is through theoutlet and thence down the Mississippi for nearly a mile, to get into a long,straight cut-off which avoids some great bends. But there is a shorter way still,if one can find it, as I did on coming down — an obscure point directly oppositethe pier, in the reeds, where a canoe can be pushed through into the nearestbend, and so save more than a mile. A fact which may have originated or perpetuatedthe above noted confusion of names is that, above this large White Oakor Stephen’s l. there is a point of hard-wood called Little White Oak pt., occupyinga position with reference to the larger lake like that which the originalPointe aux Chênes or Oak pt. bears to the lesser lake. A glance at the Engineerchart, or at such a good map as Jewett’s, on the scale of 2 m. to theinch, will give a clearer idea of these points than the most elaborate descriptionis likely to convey.

[II-55] "Chewockomen," as well as the "Chewockmen" of the 1807 ed., is farfrom any recognized or acceptable spelling of the Chippewa word, one fairly good form of which is Kitchimokomen. Schoolcraft has Chimoquemon. Itmeans Big Knives or Long Knives, and is commonly so translated, the referencebeing either to the swords of the officers or the bayonets of the soldiers, whichhave often struck Indians forcibly, both in a literal and in a figurative sense.Kitchimokomen corresponds to the Sioux name Isantanka, of the same meaningand application.

[II-56] On leaving White Oak pt. on the morning of Jan. 31st, Pike andMiller proceeded approximately up the course of the Mississippi to the "fork"above said, i. e., the confluence of Leech Lake fork with the main stream.This stretch, which Pike calls "nearly 15 miles long," is just 6 m. in an air-line,and not much more by the trail. The Mississippi here flows through"meadows," as Pike correctly says; these meadows are in part what Nicolletnamed Eagle Nest savannah. It is absolutely flat and low marshy ground,alternating with haying fields, extending widely on both sides of the river, S.and W. of White Oak l. Little White Oak pt. reaches the river in a narrowtongue of higher ground, from the N., while higher up several bends of theriver abut against woodland on the S. Throughout this reach the river is exceedingtortuous; its bends are, moreover, so connected with collateral channels, inpart natural and in part artificial, that the stream is virtually double and inclosesa series of large islands in its sinuous folds. Some of these thoroughfares floatthe steamboats that ply on the river to transport the hay; others are mere ditches, through which only canoes can be shoved. Two m. below (N. N.E. of) the Leech Lake fork, the Mississippi receives an important affluent,namely, the discharge of Ball Club l., which enters at about the middle of theS. border of Sect. 31, T. 145, R. 25, 5th M., and thus only about 4 m. due W.of Deer River (town). The difference in level between this lake and the riveris so slight that sometimes, when the latter is full, it backs up into the former.Ball Club is a pretty large lake — 6 m. long, usually called 7, and 1 to 2 m. broadin different places, with its long axis about N. W. and S. E.; its shape is notvery well delineated on the Engineer chart, being not elbowed enough. Theoutlet is from the lower broad end, in the same Sect. in which it joins theMississippi, and is thus less than 1 m. long (little over ½ m.). This lake isnotable because it is the usual and direct route up to Little Lake Winnibigoshishand so on, to avoid the more circuitous course of the Mississippi itself. Youtraverse the main axis of the lake from its outlet N. W. to its head, and theremake a portage of a mile or so over into Little Lake Winnibigoshish. "BallClub," the now universal name of this body of water, is a term which translatesthe F. La Crosse; Schoolcraft renders once Lac a la Crose; Pike has Lac LeCrosse and Le Cross. Schoolcraft has in another place Bogottowa l., whichaboriginal name is rendered Bagatwa by Beltrami, Pagadowan by Nicollet, byothers Pagadawin, etc. All these names refer to the celebrated game of ball,which the learned Anglojibway Warren calls baugahudoway. Several streamsfeed this lake; one of them comes in at the head, from a small lake whichSchoolcraft named Helix l., from the abundance of its snails of that genus.To return from this excursus to Pike at the mouth of the Leech Lake fork, upwhich he goes: This is of course a definite and well-known point, exactly onthe dividing line between the S. W. ¼ of Sect. 7, T. 144, R. 25, and the S. E.¼ of Sect. 12, T. 144, R. 26, 5th M. I had a good view of the confluencefrom a bit of high bank on the left or N. side of the Mississippi, lookingacross the mazes of marsh and meadow land through which both streams meanderto their junction. Leech Lake r. is a very large branch of the Mississippi,deserving the name of "fork" which Pike applies; he also calls it theSouth, and the Sang Sue branch or fork. Beltrami essays the Chippewa name,as Cazaguaguagine-sibi. Inasmuch as Pike considered this river to be themain stream, I propose to designate Leech Lake and its feeders and dischargeas the Pikean Source, in distinction from the Julian, Plantagenian, andItascan sources we shall discuss beyond. Passing the Forks, Pike and Millergo up Leech Lake r., Jan. 31st, to some undetermined point in the vicinity ofthe largest lake into which this stream expands, and which Pike calls Muddy l.This is of an oval figure, about 4 m. long by half as broad; its outlet is 3¼ m.up Leech Lake r. from the forks. Nicollet named it Lake Bessel, after thefamous scientist — his map fairly glitters with the galaxy of illustrious names hereflects from the bosoms of lakes in Northern Minnesota, though I cannotrecall an instance in which such academic nomenclature has been "understandedof the people" and retained in their speech. The lake in presentmention is always called Mud or Muddy, and is much frequented by theIndians for the eminently utilitarian purpose of gathering wild rice. I saw astring of their canoes heading that way Aug. 15th, 1894.

[III-1] It is simple justice to Pike to state here that, in making this widely erroneous statement, he reflected common report of his day, and that he elsewhere himself qualifies the assertion. Thus, in his general review of the Mississippi(which in the orig. ed. formed Doc. No. 18, p. 41 seq. of the App. to Part 1),he says of the Leech Lake branch: "This is rather considered as the mainsource, although the Winipeque [read Winnibigoshish] branch is navigable thegreatest distance." If the volume of waters collected by Leech l. and then contributedto the Mississippi were made the criterion, the true Itascan source mighthave to look to its laurels. Deferring other considerations to a more convenientconnection, we may here confine attention to the Leech Lake system. Thelake itself is much the largest body of water in the Mississippi basin above MilleLacs, much exceeding in size Lake Winnibigoshish, which itself much exceedsLake Cass. These three are the largest reservoirs of the whole drainage areawhose waters unite at the junction of the Leech Lake branch with the mainstream. This area, taken down to Pokegama falls, is about 80 m. from E.to W. and 50 from N. to S.; its content is more than a thousand lakes and rivers, few of which have been named. These are quite clearly divided intotwo main sets, namely, those of the Leech Lake system on the one hand, andall the rest on the other. Leech l. is not much smaller than Red l. (of a differentsystem); its greatest diameter in one direction is over 20 m.; its figure isextremely irregular, giving a shore-line said to be of about 160 m. length, with9 principal salient re-entrances and 6 large bays; the feeders, large and small,are 25-30 in number. The "fond du lac" is at that S. W. place where thewaters of Kabekona and other lakes discharge by the Kabekona r., in Sect. 9,T. 142, R. 31, 5th M. This series affords, with several portages, a tolerablydirect approach to Lake Itasca, which lies at an air-line distance of about 25 m.nearly due W. North of the mouth of the Kabekona, in Sect. 9, T. 143, ofthe same R. and M., the Kapukasagitowa, Pikesagidowag, or Bukesagidowag r.falls in from the N. W. This point is only 7 m. directly S. of the southernmostpart of Cass l., and a chain of 10 small lakes here lies between Cass andLeech, offering a waterway with some portages. Two of these small lakes areMoss and Shiba of Schoolcraft; two others of them are his Kapuka Sagitowalakes. Further E. on the N. shore of Leech l. a river falls in from the N.in Sect. 14, T. 144, R. 30. This is Carp r. of Schoolcraft, draining from achain of small lakes which approach the Mississippi itself in that portion of itscourse which runs from Cass to Winnibigoshish l. The N. E. extremity ofLeech l., called Rush l. by Schoolcraft and Pickering bay by Nicollet, reacheswithin 4 m. (air-line) of Lake Winnibigoshish; there is a small lake between,named Lake Duponceau by Nicollet, but now known as Portage l., from thefunction indicated by this name. In fact it is easier to go from Winnibigoshishover into Leech than from Cass over into the same. Along the S. W., S., S. E.,and E. shores of Leech l. is a succession of affluents, some of the larger ofwhich respectively establish waterways of communication with Crow Wing r.,with Pine r., and with Willow r. The largest of these Leech l. tributaries isKwiwisens or Boy r., which offers by its system of lakes and portages the mostdirect route by way of Willow r. to Sandy l. Some of the lakes along this lineare by Nicollet named Hassler, Gauss, Deluot, Eccleston, Brûlé, and Rosati.One of the communications with Pine r. is made by Sandy r., which falls intoLeech l. from the S. (The Crow Wing connections are noticed elsewhere indetail.) Leech l. discharges by Leech Lake r. near its N. E. extremity, theoutlet being in Sect. 29, T. 144, R. 28, 5th M. The discharge is now controlledby a dam which, like the similar structures at the outlet of Lake Winnibigoshishand elsewhere, is designed to utilize the lakes as artificial reservoirsto regulate the flow of the Mississippi according to the requirements for navigation.Leech Lake r. is bowed into an arc whose chord is 16 m. long; Mud l.lies in its course, as already said. The principal projection of land into Leechl. from the N. is the well-known Otter-tail pt.; opposite this, from the south,is Big pt.; continuous with which, by a narrow isthmus, is a very extensivepeninsula of remarkable form, something like a badly shaped anchor or a distortedletter T. This Tau-formed peninsula is the best known and most historicplace about the lake, as the site of a Chippewa village and various other establishments,of which more anon. There are several islands in Leech l.; thelargest is Bear or Mukwa isl. (Macuwa of Beltrami); two others are Pelican andGoose. Leech l. derives its English name from the F. Lac Sang Sue, or L. auxSangsues, originally bestowed in compliment to the sanguisugent annelids withwhich it was supposed to be peculiarly favored, by the Chippewas, who conveyedtheir meaning in the voluble vocable Kasagaskwadjimekang.

[III-2] Voy. en — ‰gypte et en Syrie, etc., 2 vols., 8vo, Paris, 1787; tr. Eng., London,1787, etc. Constantin François Chasseb — uf, Comte de Volney, b. Craon,Anjou, Feb. 3d, 1757, d. Paris, Apr. 25th, 1820, is best known in letters by hiscelebrated work, commonly called "Volney’s Ruins," i. e., Les Ruines ouMéditations sur les Révolutions des Empires, etc., orig. ed. 1791, numberlesstrans. and eds. down to the present time. The illustrious author was the peerof Voltaire or Paine in philosophy and religion, and underwent the usual vicissitudesof free-thinkers of his time, from the prison to the peerage. His intellectwas clear and profound, his erudition vast and varied; so they called himan "infidel" — whatever they may have meant by that — and having given himthe name would have hanged him had he been hangable. His researches werechiefly in the fields of history, geography, archæology, linguistics, statecraft,and priestcraft, all of which he illuminated to the great inconvenience of politicaland ecclesiastical demagogues. Nullum tetigit quod non ornavit; the clergy,however, he adorned with a touch that Voltaire himself might have envied. Count Volney was in the U. S. in 1795-6-7; his controversy with the meritoriousbut somewhat obtuse Priestley, on the unquestionable unorthodoxy ofhis Ruins, brought his more formal scientific works into prominence, andaccentuated the fame of his most imperishable treatise. Cheap editions ofthe Ruins abound, usually including the tract originally entitled La LoiNaturelle; this is a little catechism designed by a great philosopher to kindlyhelp little fools out of some of their folly; it is quite worthy to rank withPaine’s Age of Reason. Volney’s complete works were edited by A. Bossange,8 vols., Paris, 1820-26. Pike was in good company on the 3d, while he nursedhis sore feet.

[III-3] This clerk is named Roussand beyond, Feb. 9th. He is "a Monsr. Boussant"in the early text, 1807, p. 40.

[III-4] We have no hint of the route by which the main party reached Leech l.after Pike first left them on the 26th of Jan., unless one is conveyed in the statement that Miller returned with a supply of provisions for them. That wouldseem to imply that they followed Pike’s trail, and came to Leech l. by a routethe same as his, or one not materially different. This is in fact what they did:see note51, p. 142. The shorter way would have been that Willow Rivertraverse indicated in note1, p. 153. What seems to have been a usualroute in former days is clearly indicated on Nicollet’s map. Starting fromSandy l. it struck W. to Willow r. and went up this to Rosati and Brulé lakes,whence by portage over to Eccleston or Deluot l., and so to the Boy’s Riverconnection, continued through Gauss and Hassler lakes. All these have differentnames now, and I cannot speak with confidence in the new nomenclature.Among the lakes of Nicollet’s series appear to be those now called Big Rice,Thunder, and Boy.

[III-5] This letter formed Doc. No. 5, on p. 14 of the App. to Pt. 1 of the orig.ed. It is given beyond, together with Mr. M’Gillis’ reply; which latter wasDoc. No. 6, p. 17 of the same App. in the orig. ed.

[III-6] This is the first intimation we have that Pike is not already at the west end,or at any rate on the west side of Leech l. He certainly has told us that he"crossed the lake 12 miles" to reach Mr. M’Gillis’ house, where he is nowquartered. The only place marked on Pike’s map is on the W. side, with thelegend "N. W. Co. Ho. Lat. 47° 16´ 18´´ N." The position of this seems tohave been near Sugar pt., and to be the same as that marked "Old N. W.House" on Lt. James Allen’s map facing p. 76 of Schoolcraft’s Rep. pub. 1834.There have been various trading-houses at the same and different points aboutLeech l., simultaneously and successively. In 1832, according to Schoolcraft’slarge map in the work just said, there was a "Tr. Post" on the E. side of thelake, between the outlet and Boy’s r., but the principal one was on the Tau-formedpeninsula, and was a post of the Am. Fur Co. Schoolcraft was campedthere July 16th, 1832. This place was then also the site of the Chippewa villageof Gueule Platte or Flat Mouth, a chieftain of whom Pike has something to say soon, and of whom Nicollet, who met him there in 1836, has told us somewhat, Rep. 1843, p. 61 seq.

[III-7] The Sweet of the above paragraph is elsewhere named by Pike as Wiscoupand Le Sucre, first chief of a Red Lake band of Chippewas; The Burnt,as Oole and La Brule, for which latter phrase I suppose Le Brûlé might be preferredby some fastidious persons. The Buck is Iaba Waddik of Schoolcraft,Summary, etc., 1855, p. 144. The Sweet was probably not so named from anysuch personal peculiarity as would have singled him out among all Indians of whatevertribe, but with reference in some way to the concrete juice of the sugar-maple,Acer saccharinum, upon which he fed: cf. Sugar pt., a place-name in this vicinity.This is evidently the poetical case of "sweets to The Sweet" — not of saccharumper se. The scholarly Anglojibway, Hon. W. W. Warren, who should knowbest how to spell Chippewa words of any author I have read, gives the name asWeeshcoob. This chief had great character, and a long career. For some ofhis exploits which became historical, see Minn. Hist. Coll., V. 1885, pp. 231,376, 452, 454, 458 — latter with esp. ref. to Pike.

[III-8] Haut Lac aux Cèdres Rouges of the French, Upper Red Cedar l. of theEnglish, in distinction from the one of like name much further down the Mississippi, near Aitkin: see note47, p. 135. Pike is careless about the names, andcalls both lakes Red Cedar, or Cedar without further qualification. The valuablespecies of Juniperus, commonly known as "cedar" or "red cedar," is nota very abundant tree in N. Minnesota, and its prevalence about each of theselakes duplicated their designation. They are too far apart, luckily, for anyconfusion to have ever arisen. Pike’s description of Up. R. C. l. is not good,and his map is so far out as to omit entirely the entrance of the Mississippi intothis lake; for what he delineates as and mistook for the entrance of the mainriver is merely the discharge of the Turtle River chain of lakes from the Beltramianor so-called Julian source of the Mississippi, which falls in at the extremeN. border of the lake. Thus, what the text means by saying "from the entranceof the Mississippi to the streight is called six miles," is the distance from the mouth of Turtle r. to the strait which divides off Pike’s bay from the rest ofCass l.; "thence to the south end," etc., is the length of Pike’s bay; the"bay at the entrance" of the supposed Mississippi, i. e., of Turtle r., meansthe general recess of Cass l. on the N.; and finally, the "large point," given as2½ m. "from the north side," is the point of Colcaspi or Grand isl., which isalmost a peninsula, and which marks off Allen’s bay from the rest of Cass l.With this much by way of comment on Pike, we will look further at this interestingbody of water, which I have lately crossed twice. Its first Englishname, after the ones above given, was Lake Cassina, bestowed by Schoolcraftin 1820, in honor of Governor and General Lewis Cass (b. Exeter, N. H.,Oct. 9th, 1782, d. Detroit, Mich., June 17th, 1866), leader of the expeditionwhich made its nearest approach to the true source of the Miss. r., in July ofthat year. Their camp was on the N. shore, close by the mouth of Turtle r.,on the W. side of that mouth, directly opposite the site of the N. W. Co. Ho.where Pike now is. The name "Cassina Lake" stands on the Schlcr. map ofthe 1820 Cass exped.; item, "Cassina L." is on Long’s map, 1823; the adj.Cassinian also occurs in Schlcr. and elsewhere; but the latter afterward clippedthe name to Cass, and it has become fixed in this form — the same as that of thecounty later dedicated appropriately to this eminent statesman and soldier. TheSchlcr. map of 1820 also lays down the Turtle River system with approximateaccuracy, and on this map was first traced the course of the Mississippi to LakeItasca. This had not then received its present name, but stands there as"L. Labeish," i. e., Lac La Biche, or Lac à la Biche, translating the ChippewaOmoshkos Sogiagon, and translated Elk l. in English. The main defectof the 1820 map was in laying down the Itascan source to the N. W. insteadof to the S. W. of Cass l. — thus really on the line of the Turtle River source.This mistake was corrected in 1832, the year that Schoolcraft’s party wereguided to Lake Itasca itself by the Chippewa chief, Ozawindib or Yellow Head.Schoolcraft’s nomenclature, as far as possible, was accepted by the greatestgeographer who ever saw the source of the Mississippi, and Nicollet’s examplein this respect has been generally followed. Cass is a beautiful lake, the thirdlargest in the drainage-area of the uppermost Mississippi, being exceeded insize only by Winnibigoshish and Leech. The greatest length is nearly meridional;including Pike’s bay it is 9¾ m.; the greatest breadth is almost due E.and W.; including Allen’s bay it is 7½ m. In position with reference to the5th meridian (the only one with which we have to do in this note), the Range lineof townships 30-31, and the Township line of 145-146, decussate at right anglesin the center of the lake, just off the E. shore of Colcaspi isl. The body of waterthus occupies portions of four townships. In figure Cass l. is more irregularthan Lake Winnibigoshish, less so than Leech l. Pike’s bay, on the S., isalmost shut off from the rest of the lake by a long, narrow peninsula whichstretches nearly across from E. to W., leaving but a very narrow thoroughfare.Pike’s bay is of rounded form, about 3 m. in any diameter. Allen’s bay, onthe W., is almost equally well marked off by Colcaspi isl.; it is 2 — m. long,with an average width of over a mile, and includes two small islands, named Elmand Garden. Red Cedar isl. lies in the S. E. part of the main body of water;but the most conspicuous feature of the lake is the island best known as Grandor Colcaspi. The latter curious name is one of those verbal wind-eggs whichSchoolcraft was fond of hatching; he tells us it is compounded of fragments ofthe names of "the three prior explorers," meaning Cass and himself, 1820, andPike, 1806. This Island of Ozawindib, as named by Brower, 1894, is shapedlike a blacksmith’s anvil or molar tooth; its greatest diameters, along conjugatediagonal axes, are 2¾ and 2½ m.; aside from its horns, the island would yielda square of about 1¼ m. The Chippewa village of Ozawindib, where Schoolcraftwas camped July 10th and again July 15th — between which dates he went toItasca and back — was on the N. E. point of the anvil. I should advise canoeiststo give this point a wide berth; for a shoal runs far out northward, and thebirch-bark may thump on a stony bottom if there is any sea. This shoalreaches out directly across the straightest traverse from the inlet to the outlet ofthe Mississippi. Ozawindib isl. is almost a peninsula in relation to the northshore of the lake, but a canoe can generally be floated across the isthmus. I wadedand dragged my boat on going up, but on returning was obliged to make aportage of a few paces, as the water had lowered. But even if it be founda carrying-place, it is the shortest and best way across the lake from the inletof the Mississippi, either to its outlet or to the inlet of Turtle r. The latterfalls in at the extreme N. of the lake, 2½ m. W. N. W. from the outlet of theMississippi, in the N. E. ¼ of Sect. 18, T. 146, R. 30. Here came DavidThompson in 1798, along the usual traders’ route from the Red River country,in part the then supposed course of the Mississippi itself above Red Cedar l.Here, in Roy’s N. W. Co. House, on the E. or left bank, is Pike this 12th ofFebruary, 1806. Here were Cass and Schoolcraft in 1820; here came Beltramiin 1823, down this same Turtle r. from his Lake Julia, and so from the Juliansource of the Mississippi. A mission once stood here; there is now an Indianvillage at a little distance westward. The place may be recognized at a distanceby a high ridge on the right or W. bank; and on nearer approach by a stoutpost with historical inscriptions, erected by Brower in August, 1894. Abouta mile up Turtle r. expands into a lake, called Kichi by Nicollet in 1836,and by error Kitihi, as on Brower’s map of 1892. No other considerablestream enters Cass l., excepting the Mississippi itself. The Mississippileaves the lake in a recess on the N. E. shore, easy to find by good land-marks — noticea clump of trees on the right of the outlet as you approach it, anda house on the first rising ground to the left. The position is in the N. E. ¼of Sect. 21, T. 146, R. 30. From this point the river flows nearly E. S. E. intoLake Winnibigoshish (makes 2 — m. of southing in 8¼ m. of easting — air-lineabout 9 m.). The general course is about straight, but the reciprocal bends arenumerous, giving an actual course, as I should judge, of 16¾ m., though theycall it 18. This is Cass r. or Red Cedar r. — the most beautiful part of theMississippi — good flat water and plenty of it at the lowest stages of canoeing,with a moderate current and no rapids, shoals, or snags to speak of; also, goodcamping places all along on the wooded points or knolls. The only tributary ofthis "interlaken" course of the Mississippi is from the S., about halfway betweenCass and Winnibigoshish; being the discharge from Horn l. (Eshkabwaka l.of Owen), ¾ of a mile (direct) E. of the boundary between Itasca and Beltramicos., in the S. E. ¼ of Sect. 30, T. 146, R. 29.

Pike at Leech l. was the nearest he ever went to the true source of the Mississippi — about25 m. in an air-line E. of Lake Itasca. Pike at Cass l. is further away from this goal, but he is on the course of the great river. Having alreadynoted the Leech Lake sub-basin, or what I call the Pikean source, I will withthe reader’s indulgence indicate the main features of the true Itascan or Nicolletiansub-basin. To this end we will start together from Cass l. and paddleour own canoe to Lake Itasca. The following observations are from my canoevoyage from Deer River to Lake Itasca and return, Aug. 15th-Sept. 3d, 1894:

The Mississippi enters Cass l. at the W. end of Allen’s bay, by a crooked s-shapedthoroughfare about a mile long, from the next lake above. The inlet into Cass opens in the center of Sect. 29, T. 146, R. 31; the outlet from theother lake is in the N. W. ¼ of the same section. So close, in fact, are thetwo lakes, that at two places they are only separated by 100 yards or less. Atthe northern one of these short portages stands a dilapidated old chapel, once amission-house, and other buildings are scattered about, chiefly Chippewa cabins.I could learn no name for this next lake, though it appears to be the one Schoolcraftcalled Andrusia in 1855; but if so, the name has lapsed. A letter beforeme from Hon. J. V. Brower, Itasca State Park Commissioner, dated St. Paul,Sept. 15th, 1894, says: "The beautiful body of water situated upon Sects. 7, 8,17, 18, 19, 20, 29, and 30, T. 146, R. 31, 5th M., above Cass lake, and throughwhich the Mississippi takes its course, has this day been named by me LakeElliott Coues, as a slight recognition of your services to the public, and for thepurposes of a more accurate and correct geographical description." This lakeis 3½ m. long by 1¼ m. in greatest breadth, with its long axis meridional. The Mississippi runs across its S. end about ¾ of a mile from W. to E., the inlet being in the N. W. ¼ of Sect. 30 of the same T. and R. as the outlet.A trader’s house is on the N. side, in a Chippewa village. A winding course ofthe Mississippi of 2 m. brings us to another lake, Pamitascodiac or Tascodiac ofSchoolcraft, and Vandermaelen of Nicollet. This is hourglass-shaped, 2¼ m.long by about a mile across either bulb. The Mississippi enters it at the N.and leaves it at the E., the inlet and outlet being within half a mile of eachother, in Sect. 25, T. 146, R. 32. For 2 or 3 m. above Lake Tascodiac canoeingis easy, through the flat water of marsh and meadow land; but then beginsthe trouble which hardly intermits thence to Lake Bemidji. The canoeist mayas well put on his rubber boots at the start and keep them on, for he will haveto wade most of the way and drag or shove his boat through almost incessantrocky rapids, shoals, and snags. My canoe drew only about 3 inches of water whenmy man and myself were overboard, yet we had great difficulty in getting alongat all without portaging. Where the water is flat, it is shoal and snaggy; otherwiseit is all "Metoswa" rapids. The distance from Lake Tascodiac to LakeBemidji is only 8 m. in an air line, but this is the chord of a considerable arcthe river describes northward, which, with the minor bends around the woodedpoints, makes, as I judge, about 13½ m. of water-course. The people call it20 m., but that is because it is such a hard road to travel. It took me a dayand a quarter to make Bemidji from Elliott Coues; but I did the same distancein less than one day coming down. Beltrami calls this course "Demizimagua-maguen-sibi,or River of Lake Traverse," II. p. 434 — which reminds me to saythat among the Indians each section of the river between lakes takes the name ofthe lake whence it flows. The Bemidji section of the Mississippi issues from thelake of that name in the N. W. ¼ of Sect. 2, T. 146, R. 33, near the middleof the E. shore. This outlet is hidden in a maze of bulrushes, and as there is noconspicuous landmark on shore it is not easy to find. Lake Bemidji is a largebody of water 5½ m. long N. and S., by 1¾ to 2½ m. broad, of somewhatpyriform figure, lying athwart the course of the Mississippi: whence the F. nameLac Traverse, which we render Traverse, Travers, and Cross lake; Schl.named it Queen Anne’s l. in 1855. Among the Indian forms are Pamitchi,as Schoolcraft; Pemidji, as Nicollet; also Bermiji, Permidji, etc., and withan additional element Bemejigemug, Pamajiggermug, etc. The N. endof Bemidji is only 2½ m. from the S. end of Turtle l., so that the Juliansources may be here easily reached by portage. From the outlet as abovedescribed to the inlet is 2¾ m. on a S. W. course; for the Mississippi enters atthe extreme S. W. angle, in the N. W. ¼ of Sect. 16, T. 146, R. 33. Here aresome Chippewa cabins, and here is also the lair of one of the ferocious blood-suckingparasites of the tribe of Indian traders. The system only differs fromrobbery in name. For instance, the squaw-man will sell you a whitefish for 10cents a pound. He bought that fish for two cents a pound from the Indian whocaught it, and he also paid for it in goods at his own price, probably about fivetimes their cost to him. Those old traders who were satisfied to make 250 percent. on prime cost were meek and lowly philanthropists in comparison withsome of their successors. A short wide thoroughfare of about 40 rods leadsdirectly from Bemidji into Lake Irving, so named by Schoolcraft in 1832 afterthe facile writer, and still so called. This is only 1½ m. broad by ¾ long,lying chiefly in Sects. 16 and 17; the Mississippi comes directly across its shortaxis from S. to N. The inlet is at the S. E. corner of Sect. 17. On Nicollet’spublished map "L. Irving" appears out of place altogether, on another stream.But that is a mere accident of cartography, for which the admirable geographeris not responsible; he knew where Lake Irving is as well as I do. Three shortbends and then a straight course of a mile bring us up the Mississippi to themouth of a river from the S., to be particularly noted for several reasons. It isthe largest remaining tributary of the Mississippi, and one of its sources is a lakeno more than 5 m. from Itasca itself. This river joins the Mississippi in theS. E. of Sect. 20, T. 146, R. 33. Going up it we at once fall upon the verysmall Lake Marquette; next, Lake La Salle (Lasale on Nicollet’s map), largerand hourglass-shaped; next, Lake Plantagenet, a two-legged body of water,2¾ m. long by 1¾ broad. The first two were named in 1832 by Schoolcraft,who also said the largest one was called Kubba Kunna, or Rest in the Path l. — theseterms becoming Rahbahkanna and Resting l. in Allen. Continuing throughLake Plantagenet and up this "Plantagenian source" of the Mississippi, as ithas come to be known, we find that it forks in Sect. 21, T. 144, R. 34, at adirect distance of 7 or 8 m. from Lake Plantagenet. The fork on our left as wego up takes us 5 or 6 m. further to Lake Naiwa, called Neway l. by Nicollet,and recently renamed Lake George. Alongside and emptying into this isNicollet’s L. Bowditch, lately renamed L. Paine. These two are in Sects. 15, 19,22, and 21, T. 143, R. 34. Going up the other fork, we find in about 3 m.that it forks. The fork on our left as we go up comes N. from a number ofsmall lakes, one of them lately become known as Lake Chenowagesic; and thisis probably to be considered the main course of the river we are now on. Theother fork comes from the west; if we follow it up we proceed directly towardLake Itasca, and find our stream heading in a lake which occupies portions ofSects. 2 and 11, T. 143, R. 35. This is Lake Assawa — Ossowa and Usawa ofSchoolcraft, Usaw-way or Perch of Allen, Assawe of Nicollet; also, Lake Aliceof the Rand-McNally map (Chicago, 1894), whose compilers adopted thenames bestowed by a certain unfortunate excursionist. Another name thisunhappy person gave this same lake is Elvira. It is historically of the greatestpossible interest, for from Lake Assawa did Schoolcraft’s party proceed by portageto discover Lake Itasca in 1832, and from it also did Nicollet proceed byportage to Lake Itasca in 1836, and so on to discover the actual source of theMississippi, which Schoolcraft missed in his hurry on that happy-go-lucky 13thof July. As to the name which the whole stream thus sketched should bear,there may be two opinions. Schoolcraft maps it with the legend "Plantagenianor South Fork of the Mississippi," and makes the Assawa Lake fork the mainsource, calling the Naiwa Lake fork by the name of this lake. Nicollet namesthe main stream R. Laplace, after the celebrated astronomer, as he did L.Bowditch after the translator of that author’s Mécanique Céleste; and he considersthe main stream to be that middle one which comes from the Chenowagesicl., furthest from the S. (over the border of Hubbard Co., in fact). Thisview is undoubtedly correct, and I, for one, should like to see Nicollet’s designationof Laplace r. stand. But the river is in fact called the Naiwa, and thiscurrent designation will probably prevail. I observe that our best maps in thepresent uncertainty omit any name, though the Rand-McNally map legends"Schoolcraft R." (after Eastman’s, 1855). Should the main stream come to beknown to geographers as the Naiwa, I would suggest that its E. fork be calledthe East Naiwa, agreeably with Schoolcraft’s, 1832; and the other the West Naiwa.

We return from this excursion up the Naiwa or Laplace r. — the Plantageniansource of the Mississippi — and proceed up the latter from the mouth of the former. We hold a due W. course on the whole for 5½ m. in an air-line, buton a zigzag with multitudinous minor tortuosities, making the distance morethan twice as far; part of the way winding among wooded points, working ourway over shoals and among snags, to a point in the N. W. ¼ of Sect. 28, T. 146,R. 34. Here the small Allenoga r., on our right from the north, discharges froma small, crooked lake which lies mainly in Sects. 16 and 21. Knowing no namefor this, I call it Cowhorn l., from its shape and from the trivial circumstance offinding a horn stuck on a stake in the river. We go on through a monotonous,swampy tract of reeds, rushes, wild rice, and lily-pads, alternately approachingand receding from tamarac clumps as the river winds about, for 2½ m. furtherW. in an air-line, and more than three times that distance in actual paddling, tillwe reach some haying-meadows, and soon find the entrance of a notable streamon our right, in the N. E. ¼ of Sect. 25, T. 146, R. 35; this is Pinidiwin r.(Pinnidiwin, Carnage, and De Soto r. of Schoolcraft, Piniddiwin of Brower),through a lake about a mile wide, filled with a fine crop of wild rice.Hence it is one of many lakes which are called La Folle, Rice, or Manomin(Monomina on the Rand-McNally map); but it had better keep the distinctivename of the river which flows through it. I paddled up into Pinidiwin l., andwas surprised at the volume of water it discharged, as well as at the strengthof its current. But the river is a large, forked stream which drains a very extensivearea N. of the Mississippi. The volume of the Mississippi seemed diminishednearly one-half above the mouth of this "Little Mississippi." The courseup the Mississippi is now S. W. to a point in the S. E. ¼ of Sect. 35, T. 146, R.35; where, at a bend, it receives a sizable tributary from the S. Nicollet chartsthis stream, but has no name for it, and I know of none, excepting that suspicious"Hennepin R." which appears on the same Rand-McNally map, so thoroughlyvitiated by countenancing the names given by a dishonest person. Hennepin r.rises as far south as about the middle of T. 144, R. 35, and flows nearly duenorthward; one of its tributaries comes from a certain Lake Joliet, the name ofwhich arose with the same trickster. Rounding the bend here we go up N. W.into the middle of Sect. 28, T. 146, R. 35, and turn S. W. to the corner of thissection, on the property of Mr. A. J. Jones, a bona fide settler and cultivator of thesoil. The situation is also marked by a small creek (say Jones’) which falls inhard by from the W.; but it is more notable as a sort of "Great Bend" of theMississippi; for here is the place where, our course thus far having been on thewhole westward, we turn quite abruptly southward to make for Lake Itasca,distant about 14 m. as the crow flies, but at least twice as far as that by the waywe paddle. It has been good flat water, with no obstructions to speak of, formany miles back; but a little distance above Jones’ place we come to rockyrapids for half a mile, reminding us of our experiences below Lake Bemidji. Ido not think that these, but that some of those higher up, are the rapids whereAllen’s boat was wrecked on the 15th of July, 1832, though Schoolcrafttalks of having come "32" m. from Itasca on the 14th, before the accident.As we proceed, other obstacles offer; snags abound, the Mississippi becomes inplaces too shallow to float a canoe, and in others bushes begin to meet acrossthe channel, or fallen logs require to be chopped out of the way. We pass aninsignificant creek on the right, and then soon sight quite an imposing pine-cladridge on the left. Here, in the S. W. ¼ of Sect. 19, T. 145, R. 35, is themouth of a creek on the left. This is marked on Schoolcraft’s map "Cano R.",i. e., Canot or Canoe r., also Ocano (Au Canot), and Chemaun r. It is chartedby Nicollet, without any name. It has been described by Brower as Andrus cr.,is on Eastman’s map (1855) as De Witt Clinton’s r., and was once named LaSalle r. by an unscrupulous person. Above Andrus cr., in the S. E. ¼ of Sect.26 of the tp. last said, a small creek comes in on the right, at "Dutch Fred’s"place. I heard a man call it Bear cr. Here the Mississippi enters (or ratherleaves) a haying-meadow, and within a mile receives a small creek on our left,from the S., locally known as Killpecker or Chillpecker cr. It is less than amile hence to the house of one Searles, in the S. W. ¼ of Sect. 35, T. 145, R.35. There is still visible evidence that this was the site of an old trading-post;and on discussing the case with my friend Brower, I agreed with his conclusionthat it was most probably the very spot we hear of from William Morrison, whowas the first known of white men at Lake Itasca, in 1804. From this place upwardto Lake Itasca the Mississippi is practically unnavigable, at least in such alow stage of water as that I found — not so much on account of the extensiverapids as from snags and brush. The distance is called 20 m. — even 25 m., ifone wants you to hire his wagon — but it is nothing of the sort; 12 m. wouldcover it. The air-line from Searles’ house to Itasca is just 6 m., and thoughthe river is tortuous, besides having a general westward curve, it can hardlybe more than twice as much. One creek on this course, called Division cr.by Brower, falls in from the W. in the S. W. ¼ of Sect. 27, T. 144, R. 36.A wagon-road leads from Searles’ due S. to the lower end of the N. arm ofLake Itasca. The distance is about 7 m. by this road, which keeps on the ridgeE. of the Mississippi till it ends at the lake, close by the outlet, in the S. W. ¼of Sect. 35, T. 144, R. 36, thus almost on the line between T. 144 and T.143, which cuts the end of the N. arm, and forms the N. boundary of ItascaState Park. Here Brower discovered the site of a prehistoric village inOct., 1894.

This park, created by Act of the Minnesota Legislature, approved Apr.20th, 1891, is 7 m. N. and S. by 5 m. E. and W., thus being 35 square miles,19,701 — acres, consisting of Sects. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36, of T. 143, R. 36, inBeltrami Co., with Sects. 1, 2, 3, 4, of T. 142, R. 36, in Becker Co.,Sects. 6, 7, 18, 19, 30, 31, of T. 143, R. 35, and Sect. 6, of T. 142, R. 35 — thesein Hubbard Co. The rectangle thus delimited includes nearly all thenatural features about to be noted, in the area designated as the ultimate reservoirbowl of the Mississippi by Brower, to whose admirable official report I amindebted for some particulars which did not come under my personal observationon the spot, Aug. 24th and 25th, 1894. The brim of the bowl is the Height ofLand, Nicollet’s Hauteurs des Terres, sc. between Hudsonian and Mexicanwaters; for all the water in the bowl runs into the Mississippi. The politicalboundary of the park is less than conterminous with the area of this bowl. Thelatter is conveniently divided into the greater and lesser segments, accordingto whether the waters drain into the W. or the E. arm of Lake Itasca; the greater segment contains the primal sources of the Mississippi. The brim ofthe bowl has a maximum elevation of 1,750 feet above sea-level. The southernmostlake in the bowl is Brower’s Hernando de Soto, supposed to be 2,555¼ m.from the Gulf of Mexico, at an altitude of 1,558 feet. Another is Morrison l.There are too many other small lakes to mention, mostly beyond or besideany actual permanent surface connection with the Mississippian stream; twolittle ones which come very near to such connection are Whipple and FloatingMoss. The Mississippi springs from the ground under a hill which I call theVerumontanum; the first collection of living waters, or what may be termedFons et Origo Springs, occurs about the contiguous corners of Sects. 28/33|27/34, T. 143,R. 36. The rill which issues thence runs northward in Sects. 27 and 28, collectingthere in a pool worthily named by Brower the Upper Nicollet l., after the keen-eyedgeographer who first spied and mapped it in connection with his immortaldiscovery of the Mississippian Verum Caput. But this Lacus Superior Nicolletiis not now connected by surface flowage with the continuation of the Mississippi;Brower is correct in designating its feeder as the "detached upper fork" of theMississippi; for the Upper Nicollet l. is separated by a dry ridge a few yardswide, forming a sort of "natural bridge," under or through which water seeps,but over which it certainly never flows. Stepping a few paces over this PonsNaturalis, we descend into a boggy place where the several Nicollet Springsissue from the ground and form a rill whose waters are continuous to the Gulf ofMexico. If one wishes to "cover" the Mississippi in any sense, one may doso literally here, where the river is a few inches wide and fewer deep, by lyingat full length on both sides of the stream and drinking out of the channel. Thisrivulet is the principal feeder of the Middle Nicollet l., which is of oval figure,less than — of a mile long, lying chiefly in the S. E. ¼ of Sect. 21. The outletof this lake is close to the inlet, by a well-defined stream say — of a mile long,which starts W., receives a small tributary called Howard cr. from the S., andthen curves N. into the Lower Nicollet l., — m. E. of the Middle l. This isin size between the Upper and Middle lakes; it receives two rills, one of themcalled Spring Ridge cr.; the Mississippi issues from the N. end of this lake, andthence pursues a general N. E. course for about ¾ of a mile in an air-line,though crookedly and with several small bends, to fall into the head of the W.arm of Lake Itasca, in the S. W. ¼ of Sect. 15. On its way it receivesDemaray cr. from the W. Thus is constituted, entirely above or S. of LakeItasca, the Infant Mississippi, discovered by Nicollet in 1836, and by him poeticallystyled the Cradled Hercules. The cradle is now known as Nicollet valley;it is bounded on the W. by the Hauteurs des Terres, now Nicollet Heights, andon the E. by a long, curved, and somewhat broken ridge, which I propose tocall Brower Ridge, after the accomplished gentleman whose name will always beassociated with the history and geography of the Itasca basin. This ridge is thebest walking from Itasca toward the Fons et Origo Springs — though in the presentstate of the ground this is not saying much in its favor, yet this way is lesslaborious than following up the Infant Mississippi. The N. end of the ridgerises on Morrison hill, which overlooks Itasca on the one hand and on the othergives a fine view of Elk l.; it is only a few steps down to either lake from thesummit, where stands the Brower post of 1887 with its historical inscription, asign-board commemorating Nicollet, and a granite bowlder more durably gravenwith a less enduring name (not Glazier). Elk l. is the largest body of water in thebowl after Itasca, being of irregular oval figure, about 1 m. long by two-thirds asbroad. It lies almost entirely in Sect. 22, immediately S. of the head of the W.arm of Itasca, and thus alongside the Herculean Incunabula, from which it isseparated by Brower Ridge. Elk l. has the bad luck of a bad name, with themore serious misfortune of a vainglorious record of "exploitation." In thefirst place the name — with due deference to Gen. J. H. Baker, who in 1876caused "Elk" to become official on the plot of T. 143, R. 36 — seems to mebadly chosen. For "Elk" was originally the English name of Lake Itasca,translating F. Lac la Biche, and Chippewa Omoshkos Sogiagon; so its transferto the smaller lake is liable to create confusion. Better Gilfillan’s LakeBreck, 1881, or Chippewa Gagiwitadinag (embosomed in hills). In the secondplace a certain unworthy person magnified the size of this lake, stretched out itsprincipal feeder southward, lengthened, widened, and deepened its dischargeinto Itasca, labeled it Lake Glazier, and trumpeted his false claim of discoveringthe one and only true source of the Mississippi, to the scandal of geographicalsocieties and other learned bodies. The best mot I ever heard on this subjectwas given me by a native of Deer River, whose remark, however, is withheld, onthe well-known principle that "the greater the truth the greater the libel." Elk l.was well described in 1872 by Julius Chambers, who called it Lake Dolly Varden;its discharge into Itasca is now known as Chambers’ cr. This is a smallside-stream about 333 yards long, in the bed of which I walked dry-shod, yetwhich has been exploited as the course of the Mississippi. Elk l. has severalfeeders, among them three creeks called Elk, Siegfried, and Gaygwedosay — thelatter for Nicollet’s guide of 1836, whom Nicollet calls Kegwedzissag. All thefeatures thus far noted are in the greater ultimate reservoir bowl, in relationwith the W. arm of Lake Itasca. Turning to the lesser part of the bowl,whose waters drain into the E. arm, we find a chain of small lakes, whosenames from S. to N. are Josephine, Ako, Danger, Twin, and Mary — the lasthaving continuous surface flow by Mary cr. into the head of the E. arm. Such,in brief, are the main features of the Mississippian waters which drain from the S.into Lake Itasca; but I suppose there are a hundred little lakes or pools in thebowl, which seep through the bibulous soil — in fact, this flowing bowl is full oflees. The largest lake, which forms its strongest feature, is of a three-pronged ortriradiate figure — mostly arms, with little body, like a star-fish. It is said thatthe early name refers to the head and antlers of the elk, respectively representedby the three projections. There is not very much difference in size and shapebetween them, though each has its particular form. Where the three prongscome together as the main body of this lake is the small but picturesque Schoolcraftisl., where the party of 1832 camped July 13th, as Nicollet did in Aug., 1836;it is decidedly the most eligible spot for the purpose, before making one’s periplusof the lake. The island is in Sect. 11, T. 143, R. 36; its absolute position hasbeen dead-reckoned by Mr. A. J. Hill to be lat. 47° 13´ 10´´ N., long. 95° 12´W. Mr. Brower has this summer (1894) set up a very stanch oaken commemorationpost, which bears a suitable legend and looks as if it might stand for acentury. The island was named by Allen (Rep., p. 332). Near it is a shallowplace called Rocky Shoal. The lake is 3 — m. in greatest length from the endof the N. to that of the E. arm; the ends of the E. and W. arms are 2 — m.apart. The W. arm is marked off by Ozawindib pt., the E. arm by Bear pt.,and Turnbull pt. projects into the latter arm about opposite the place whereNicollet struck the lake in portaging over from Lake Assawa. The best viewof the lake is to be had from Rhodes’ Hill, near the base of the E. arm. Itascahas several feeders besides Mary cr., Chambers’ cr., and the Infant Mississippi;four of these are Island cr., from the W., opposite Schoolcraft isl.; FloatingBog cr., falling in by Bear pt.; Boutwell cr., on the W. side of the W. arm;and Shawinukumag cr., a little rill close by the mouth of the Infant. There isone point about the lake I wish to signalize by the name of Point Hill, aftermy esteemed friend, Mr. Alfred J. Hill of St. Paul. When you come to the N.end of the N. arm, at the usual landing or embarking place, where McMullen’shouse stands, your view of Schoolcraft isl., as you look southward up the N. arm,is intercepted by a promontory from the W. side, near the center of Sect. 2,T. 143, R. 36; this is Point Hill. The altitude of Lake Itasca is given byBrower as 1,457 feet; its distance from the Gulf of Mexico, by the channel ofthe Mississippi, is probably about 2,550 m. — by no means those "3,184" m.which the Rand-McNally map exploits. The general situation is: 150 m. W.of Lake Superior; 125 m. S. from the N. border of Minnesota; 75 m. E. fromthe W. and 252 m. N. from the S. border of the same. The lake is reachedfrom St. Paul by 240 m. overland; take the G. N. R. R. to Park Rapids, and gothence in one day by wagon. The distance from St. Paul by the Mississippi issaid to be 560 m.; it is practically out of the question as a route, because ofobstructions to navigation, especially by logging-booms. A much easier waythan I selected for my own excursion is, as just said, to the lake by rail and wagon,thence down the Mississippi by canoe or skiff to Deer River or Grand Rapids,where you strike the D. and W. R. R., or even down to Brainerd, where theN. P. R. R. crosses. The names most prominently associated with discoveryand exploration in the Itasca basin are: William Morrison, 1804; Henry R.Schoolcraft and James Allen, 1832; Jean N. Nicollet, 1836; Julius Chambers,1872; James H. Baker and Edwin S. Hall, 1875; Hopewell Clarke, 1886;J. V. Brower, 1889-94. A more extended historical note will be found beyond;meanwhile let us return to Pike, at the mouth of Turtle r., on Cass l.

[III-9] David Thompson, the great explorer and surveyor, b. St. John’s parish, Westminster, Eng., Apr. 30th, 1770, d. Longueuil, opposite Montreal, Canada,Feb. 16th, 1857, and now with his wife in Mt. Royal cemetery. His activitiescompassed half a century, say 1790-1840, during some of which years he seemsto have been almost ubiquitous — so extensive were his travels, in the service ofthe H. B. Co., N. W. Co., and on professional duties in connection with thesurvey of the boundary between the British possessions and the United States.Mr. Thompson was a good practical astronomer and an admirable geographer.Some of his determinations would not easily be surpassed in accuracy by thebest modern methods. He was also an assiduous journalist, and a gooddraughtsman; but most of his work has never seen the light. The manuscriptswhich he left are believed to cover the long period of years during which hetraveled and observed; and to include not only his personal narrative, butalso the mathematical tables by which his astronomical observations wereworked out for the determination of latitude and longitude. They have morethan once been drawn upon for historical and geographical data; but no publication of such a thorough digest of Thompson’s life and work as couldhave been prepared from these materials under competent and critical editorshiphas ever been made. A brief recital of his journeys was read by J. B.Tyrrell, B. A., etc., before the Canadian Institute, Mar. 3d, 1888, and publishedthat year, Toronto, 8vo., pp. 28. The official records I have mentionedmust not be confounded with certain fragments of Thompson’s MSS., nowthe property of a Mr. Charles Lindsey of Toronto, and recently offered for sale.These are about 600 foolscap pp. in Thompson’s handwriting, drawn up verylate in life — being thus by no means his original journals and field note-books.Thompson was on the Missouri at the Mandan villages Dec. 29th, 1797-Jan.10th, 1798 — thus before Lewis and Clark, Oct. 27th, 1804-Apr. 7th, 1805, andthe younger Alexander Henry, July and Aug., 1806. While here he undertookto determine from Indian information the source of the Yellowstone r., andmade one of the most extraordinary computations on record; for his figuresagree within 20 m. or less with the true latitude and longitude. Thompson wasthe first white man who ever descended the Columbia r. from its head-waters tothe point where Lewis and Clark struck it, Oct. 16th, 1806; this voyage wasmade in the summer of 1811, and protracted to the Pacific at Astoria. Thatjourney to which Pike refers was made in 1798. Thompson came down theTurtle River route to Cass l., late in April, and stopped at John Sayers’ house,located by him in lat. 47° 27´ 56´´ N. and long. 95° W. If we marvel why sucha man as Thompson missed the honor of discovering the source of the Mississippi,when that prize was so near at hand, we may remember that the TurtleRiver head-waters were already the accepted source, as being the furthest N. LeavingCass l. May 3d, Thompson descended the Mississippi through Lake Winnibigoshish,and so on to the N. W. Co. house at Sandy l.; thence he went upPrairie or Savanna r., the usual traders’ route, portaged over to waters of theSt. Louis, and descended this river to the Fond du Lac house, which stood 2½m. from Lake Superior. This journey was from the post on the Assiniboine r.,at the mouth of Souris or Mouse r., which he left Feb. 25th; he reached Fonddu Lac May 10th, or in 2 months and 18 days.

[III-10] This most celebrated chief of the Leech Lake Chippewas, or Pillagers, had three names, whose several variants number probably three dozen. One of themmay be written Ask a Buggy Cuss — for if that is not right, it is as near right assome others, and easier to say than any of the rest. It is the rule that the nameis different with everyone who uses it, and it often varies with the same authorwhose "takes" fall into the hands of different compositors. Some of theforms I have noted are: Aishkibugikozsh; Aishkabugakosh; Eshkibogikoj;Esquibusicoge; Aishkebugekoshe and Eschkebugecoshe (in Minn. Hist. Coll.,V. passim); Eski Bugeckoge (in the French Pike, I. p. 220). The French formof the name was Gueule Platte; and the English of it was Flat Mouth. Pikespells the French in half a dozen different ways, the question of gender includedin the variation; while Schoolcraft, who was something of a linguist, is equallyvagarious in this case, giving us Geulle Platte, Gouelle Platte, Guelle Plat,Gueulle Plat, Guella Plat — anything you please, except Gruel Plate or GhoulPlot! Our Gallic friends themselves tried a variety of combinations, as gole,goule, gule, before they suited themselves with gueule as a satisfactory substitute for the Latin gula — just as we did before we made gulley and gullet out ofthe same old Roman stock. On Pike’s folding Abstract, the individual whosemouth, jaws, and throat are so much in literary doubt figures as "Eskibugeckoge,Geuelle Platte, Flat Mouth, first chief of his band." This was a largeone, best known as the Pillagers, also as Muckundwas, who had long maintaineda separate tribal organization. The medal which Flat Mouth had received fromthe British at Fort William on Lake Superior, and which Pike took from him tosubstitute an American one, was replaced by a large solid silver one given himby Schoolcraft July 19th, 1828. The latter author has a long and good accountof this remarkably brave and sensible Indian, who in 1832 seemed to be turnedof 60 years, about 5 feet 9 or 10 inches high, erect, but inclined to corpulency.He had been on the war-path 25 times, and had killed a good many Sioux withoutever receiving a wound. He was a man of great discernment and soundjudgment, extensively and accurately informed upon all affairs which concernedhis people or himself. There is much said of him in the Minnesota HistoricalCollections from first to last, especially in the Hon. W. W. Warren’s Historyof the Ojibwas, and Rev. E. D. Neill’s continuation of the same subject:see for example pp. 17, 19, 45, 50, 138, 178, 223, 269, 275, 324, 342, 349, 352,359, 360, 362, 369, and 459, 463, 465, 475, 478, in Vol. V. of those Collections.He figured prominently in Anglojibwa affairs for more than half a century, andwas living in 1852, at a supposed age of about 78 years, having been born about1774. The circumstances under which the Leech Lake Indians received thenames of Makandwyinniniwag, Mukundwais, or Muckundwas, F. Pilleurs, E.Pillagers, Plunderers, and Robbers, are said in substance by Schoolcraft to bethese: During the period of great irregularities in the fur-trade consequentupon the transfer of the balance of power from French to English hands, whenthe latter were still dependent in part or entirely upon the former for theirclerks and boatmen, and these were in great favor with the Indians, one Berticame on with goods and took his station at the mouth of Crow-wing r. totrade with the Chips. But he had more to sell than they could buy, includingguns and ammunition which he knew the Sioux would be glad to get. TheChips., however, forbade his thus arming their foes; and when he started forthe Sioux country, in spite of their warnings and threats, they arrested him byforce of arms, and robbed him of all he possessed, though they spared hislife. Berti returned to Sandy l., soon died of a broken heart, or of the exertionshe had made to defend his property, and was buried thereabouts. Dr.Douglass Houghton relates a curious story of this trader’s indirect causation of aterrible smallpox epidemic that ravaged the Chips. The above occurrenceswere in 1767-68. When the facts became known to the company at Mackinac,the Indians were directed to make requital, with threats of punishmentfor non-compliance. A deputation went to Mackinac in the spring of 1770,with furs which were taken as an equivalent for those which had been stolen,and the Indians were dismissed with a cask of liquor and a closely rolled flag asa token of friendship. They were enjoined not to broach the one or unroll theother till they got home. But on the way they did both, and had a drunkenspree with some of their friends at Fond du Lac. Several were taken sick,some died, and it was soon discovered that the disease had broken out amongthem. It was spread broadcast, and is said to have cost many hundred Chippewalives before its ravages ceased. Whether rightly or wrongly, the Indianswere always firmly persuaded that a dastardly outrage had been perpetratedupon them by the intentional communication to them of the disease through themedium of the presents they had received from officers of the fur company. Ihave thus cited Schoolcraft for the popular or traditional as distinguished fromthe proper or historical presentation of this case. The facts are set forth atlength in Warren’s History of the Ojibways, chap. xxi., forming pp. 256-262 ofMinn. Hist. Coll., V. 1885. The nom de guerre which the Pillagers acceptedfor themselves is there rendered Mukimduawininewug (men who take by force).There appears to be no truth whatever in laying upon the British the infamouscharge of intentional introduction of smallpox. Warren had the facts directfrom an intelligent old chief of the Pillagers, from which it appears that theterrible epidemic, costing several thousand lives, was introduced on the return ofa war-party of Kenistenos, Assineboines, and Ojibways, who had gone for scalpsto the Kechepegano (Missouri) r., and caught the infection from a village ofGiaucthinnewug (Grosventres).

[III-11] Which formed Doc. No. 6, p. 17 of the App. to Pt. 1 of the orig. ed., andwill be found beyond. This letter answered Pike’s of Feb. 7th.

[III-12] The speech made at this conference by Pike, and the replies of three chiefs,formed Docs. Nos. 7 and 8, p. 19 and p. 22 of the App. to Pt. 1 of the orig.ed. Both are found beyond.

[III-13] Though the phrase is not capitalized, this is the personal name of a LeechLake chief, whom Pike elsewhere calls Chef de la Terre and Obigouitte.

[III-14] That is, the main party, whom Pike starts off to-day with their guide, inadvance of himself, Corporal Bradley, Mr. "L’Rone," and the two youngChips. named Buck and Beau. This would be inferred from the above text,and is confirmed by that of 1807, p. 43, which says that "the men weremarched" Feb. 18th, and Pike with others was "to follow afterwards." Ihave no clew as yet to the identity of this "L’Rone." He seems to have beenthe guide whom Mr. M’Gillis provided, as Pike says on the 21st, when thisman was bundled back again, that he had then no guide. But in that case,who or what was the Reale named on the 21st — (See this name in Index.)

[III-15] Pike is on a Pine River route from Leech l. to Lower Red Cedar l., andgoes across country on a general course about S. S. E., in Cass Co. This muchis clear; but this region is none too well known, and my own information doesnot suffice me to attempt identification of the many small lakes he crosses tillhe comes to the large Whitefish l. in the course of Pine r. I doubt that wehave data which enable anyone to trail him with confidence. The multiplicityof lakes and streams of the Pine River connections affords in fact severalways when the water is open, and when everything was frozen over Pike did notnecessarily take any one of the usual routes. The air-line distance is some55 m.; but he traveled much further, as he blundered on the way and struckthe Mississippi too low down — at the mouth of present Dean cr. See note47,p. 135, and forward, where Pike describes his Pine River journey.

[III-16] Not identified; but not to be confounded with the great Sandy l. or Lacdu Sable on the other side of the Mississippi, which Pike reached Jan. 8th andleft Jan. 20th: see note49, p. 138.

[III-17] Whitefish or Fish l., as it is still called, is the largest body of water into which Pine r. expands, but by no means to be considered as its source. Severallarge streams fall into it, and the largest one of these is properly regarded asthe continuation of Pine r. This lake begins only about 10 m. (air-line) fromthe Mississippi. Nicollet names it Kadikomeg l.; two smaller ones, lowerdown on Pine r., he names Plympton and Davenport. Three of this sameconnection are now Cross, Pine, and Gear. We know exactly where Pike isto-day; though his account of what appear to be two — or three — N. W. Co.houses on this lake is not as clear as we could wish.

[III-18] On the up-voyage we figured out camp of Jan. 1st, 1806, to have been betweenDean and Hay crs.; the present pat coincidence confirms the former independent determination: see note47, p. 134. From Whitefish l. Pike forged aheadof his party, accompanied by Boley, Buck, and Beau, and bore away from Piner. direct for Lower Red Cedar l. He struck one of the little lakes connectedwith Dean cr., followed this creek down to its mouth, and recognized this pointon the Mississippi as being a mile below where he had seen the Chippewa canoesturned up Jan. 1st. Dean cr. empties 3½ m. direct, exactly 5 m. by the river,below Hay cr., about up to the mouth of which he goes to camp to-night, andeasily makes the N. W. Co. house to-morrow. Some points I did not presentin my former note on this locality are these: Between Dean and Hay crs., andjust W. of the "guide meridian" which, N. of the Mississippi, marks the separationof the 4th and 5th meridian systems of survey, is a very nearly straightstretch of the river for 2 m., nearly E. and W. This was known to the old voyageurs as the Grande Avenue. Its W. end is 1¾ m. above Dean cr.; its E.beginning is at a sharp turn of the river ½ m. below (N. N. E. of) the mouth of Hay cr., 2¾ m. scarcely E. of N. of the mouth of Cedar r.; Pine Knoll ison this turn. At the end of the first ½ m. ascending the Avenue, the rangeline between Ranges 27 and 28 (of the 4th M.) strikes the Mississippi fromthe S., and ends there; this range line is also the inter-county line between CrowWing and Aitkin cos. Rounding the bend at Pine Knoll and going less than½ m., one comes to the section line of Sects. 1 and 13, T. 136, R. 25, 5th M.;this is — m. from the mouth of Hay cr., and from this point upward AitkinCo. is on both sides of the river. Pike’s camp of the 24th was within a smallfraction of a mile from the point thus indicated.

[III-19] The first chief of the Sandy Lake Chippewas of Pike’s time is called on histable Catawabata, De Breche, and Broken Teeth. The French form is intendedfor Dent Breche, and I suppose the more usual term for a person with brokenteeth would be Brèche-dent. I have seen the word printed as "Brusha." Thenative name is rendered Cadiwabida by Schoolcraft, who speaks of him in1832 as among the dead patriarchs of his tribe. W. W. Warren renders thismore correctly Kadowaubeda; while Neill, with unusual inaccuracy on his part,speaks of Catawatabeta the Breche, in one place, and Kadewabedas, Breche,Breché-dent, or Brechedent, in others. This man was living in July, 1828,when he visited Sandy l.; he was then the oldest Chippewa chief, having been asmall boy at the time of the capture of Fort Mackinac in 1763.

[III-20] Doc. No. 9, p. 23 of App. to Pt. I of the orig. ed; to be found beyond inthe present ed.

[III-21] See note43, p. 131, Dec. 29th. It will not often be necessary to recheck mileages on the down-voyage, now fairly under way. "Pine Ridge" is hardly anamed locality, though capitalized as such. It is close to White Bear Skin r., thedischarge of Duck and Swamp lakes, near which we set camp of Dec. 29th, 1805.For a still closer indication of the present camp, take the diminutive Half Moonl., near the W. bank of the river. The point of the pine ridge is opposite that.

[III-22] There is difficulty in adjusting the discrepant records of Mar. 3d and 4th with those of Christmas week, 1805: see back, Dec. 17th-25th, and notesthere. The party were then toiling by Crow Wing r., between Ripley andBrainerd; Pike did not keep with his men, and some of the discrepancies maybe due to actual difference between his movements and theirs. Pike also says,Dec. 23d, that he was scarcely able to make his notes intelligible. The tworecords contradict instead of corroborating each other. Thus, Dec. 17th has itthat the two-barrel cache (pork and flour) was made that day, not the 19th, asabove said; and it was at or near Ripley. Dec. 20th one barrel of flour wasburied; the party were then so close on to Crow Wing r. that Pike got thereearly next morning. He did not leave Crow Wing r. till after he had taken thelatitude there, on the 24th. Meanwhile, his men were struggling up to this river.It is really a small matter, of no more than some 16 m. direct, or 20 m. by theMississippi, and thus hardly worth dwelling on; but I like to be accurate whenI can. Pike was camped at Brainerd Dec. 26th and Mar. 2d; he raised hisone-barrel cache of Dec. 20th, near Crow Wing r., on Mar. 3d, and continued ondown to the Nokasippi, which had been passed on or about Dec. 18th, not 21st,as above; on Mar. 4th he came to the two-barrel cache which he had made onDec. 17th, not 19th, as above said, when he was in the vicinity of Ripley; hecontinues to-day past Ripley, past his three days’ camp of Dec. 14th, 15th, and16th, above Olmsted’s bar, and fetches up to-night opposite his camp ofDec. 13th, in the vicinity of Topeka. Mar. 5th finds him at his stockade onSwan r. The camp of Mar. 3d, at the Nokasippi r., is an absolutely fixedpoint, as this is the only river that falls in from the E. hereabouts. "PineCamp" of the above paragraph is the place where he was camped for threedays, Dec. 14th, 15th, 16th, in the vicinity of Olmsted’s bar.

[III-23] "Between Pine creek and the post" is a slip for "between Pine camp andthe post"; for the post was on Pine creek (Swan r.). The December campspassed Mar. 5th were four: Dec. 12th, at or near Fletcher cr.; Dec. 11th, nearLittle Elk r.; Dec. 10th, at Little Falls (city); Dec. 9th, just above Swan r.,on the other side of the Mississippi. The salute had been ordered by letterfrom Grant’s house on Lower Red Cedar l.: see back, Feb. 26th. For "KilleurRouge" see note24, p. 118.

[III-24] Full name of this Menomonee chief, as listed by Pike on his tabular exhibit,where his native name is rendered Tomaw, and where the other Folle Avoinechief also appears by the above name, Shawanoe, not translated in F. or E.

[III-25] Possibly a clew here to the unidentified person whose name occurs as Greinyeaor Grienway in Lewis and Clark, ed. of 1893, p. 1188, q. v. The personhere meant is Louis Grignon: see Wis. Hist. Coll., VII. p. 247. A Mr. Grignonis mentioned in Wm. Morrison’s letter (elsewhere cited) as one of the five personsbesides himself who formed the party that came into the country fromFond du Lac in July, 1802. The name stands Greignon, text of 1807, p. 46.

[III-26] Pike’s observation strikes me as much more "singular" than the FoxIndian’s opinion. Many of us have been taught that the whole world wasonce drowned, excepting one favored family, and we have also been told howit was repeopled. That is one advantage which an enlightened Christian hasover Lo, the poor benighted Indian. The savage simply accepts that one ofthe deluge-myths which his own ancestors elaborated to suit themselves. Butthe Christian has the Word of God himself, bound up in many different editionsof various dates, for the truth of that particular deluge-myth which the Jewsappropriated, with variations to suit their own tribal vanity, from the Chaldeans.They invented very little except their precious Jehovah, who was lesspolished and less agreeable a god than most of those who were elaborated bythe more civilized tribes who surrounded and generally whipped the Jews.The Noachian narration, like the Genesis relation of both the Elohistic andthe Jehovistic scribes, was borrowed from one of the myths that clustered aboutthe legendary character known as Gisdhubar, Izdubar, etc., alleged descendantof the last antediluvian monarch Hasisadra, who became known to theGreeks through Berosus as Xisuthros. The original of this deluge-myth was recovered from the cuneiform characters by Geo. Smith of the British Museumin 1872, and may be read in English and various other modern languages, tothe great edification of the faithful, no doubt: see it, e. g., in the charmingand readily accessible book, The Story of Chaldea, by Zénaïde A. Ragozin, 2ded., 8vo, N. Y., G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1888, p. 301 and p. 314. After the aqueousallegations had been reduced to writing in Hebrew characters, and generationsof Jewish rabbis had tinkered the text to suit themselves with Masoreticpoints, and various anonymous scribes had turned it into Septuagint Greek andVulgate Latin, some people in England who had never heard of the original,could not have read a word of it if they had handled the very bricks on which itwas first stamped, and do not appear to have been informed on the subject bythe Holy Ghost, gave us their English version of the words of God duly"authorized" by "the wisest fool in Europe," as the Duc de Sully calledJames I. The most credible items in this account are that the elephant took histrunk with him and stood behind it in the ark, but that the cock and the foxwere worse off for baggage, having only a comb and a brush between them;yet I also believe just as firmly that the raven which Noah let fly was theoriginal progenitor of the Petit Corbeau who lived in the village of Kapoja,near St. Paul, Minn.

[III-27] The phrase which Pike’s interpreter applied to the woman was no doubt"La Bastonnaise." For a long period before and after the end of the last century,"Bostonian" in some form was the nickname of English-speaking whites,especially New Englanders — just as we now say "Yankee." The Indianspicked up the word from the Canadian French, and it passed from mouth tomouth across the continent; e. g., it entered the vocabulary of the Chinookjargon spoken on the N. W. Coast. To cite a case: "On my remarking to Mr.Frobisher that I suspected the Bastonnais (Bostonians, or English colonists)had been doing some mischief in Canada, the Indians directly exclaimed, ’Yes;that is the name! Bastonnais.’ They were lately from the Grand Portage,"etc., Alex. Henry, Trav. of 1761-76, 8vo, N. Y., 1809, p. 329.

[III-28] See back, note14, p. 99, Oct. 8th, 1805. Pike’s getting down to Mr. Dickson’swintering-ground in one day from the stockade on Swan r. confirms theopinion expressed in that note that this place is marked too low on his map (belowClear Water r.). It also relieves us of the difficulty that seemed to arisewhen we were told that Pike did not pass Dickson’s place till Oct. 10th, whenwe brought him up to St. Cloud. Evidently, then, our adjustment of mileagesand camps of Oct. 8th-10th is right, and Dickson’s place was at the foot of theThousand Island cluster (Pike’s Beaver isls.). The text of 1807, p. 21, speaksof "the place where Mr. Rienville and Monsr. Perlier wintered in 1797.Above it is a cluster of more than 20 islands in the course of four miles, whichthey named the Beaver islands." As to the name of the person who was with Mr.Dickson, we have choice of four: Paulier, as above; Perlier, text of Oct. 10th,of both 1807 and 1810 eds., but Paulire on p. 56 of the 1807 text; and Potier,on the map. One Antoine Pothier, a trader, is named among Laclede’s "thirtyassociates" by Billon, Ann. St. Louis, 1764-1804, pub. 1886, p. 18; and it appearsin St. Louis archives that one Isidor Peltier sold a slave to Louis Blouin,Oct. 7th, 1767. For one Pothier, 1812, see also Wis. His. Soc. Coll., XI. p. 272.But Pike’s man is Jacques Porlier, b. 1765, Milwaukee in 1783, Green Bay in1791, d. 1839: see Wis. His. Soc. Coll., III. p. 244, VII. p. 247, and Tassé,Les Canadiens de l’Ouest, 8vo, Montreal, 1878, I. pp. 137-141.

[III-29] This letter formed Doc. No. 10, p. 24, of App. to Pt. 1 of the orig. ed.; itis given beyond. It is dated Grand Isle (i. e., Grande — — le), Apr. 9th; by whichwe may infer this to have been then the name of the place where Mr. Dicksonwintered, and that this place was on a large island. All indications now arethat the wintering-place in question was on the foot of the large island at whosehead are Mosquito rapids, and only a mile or so above St. Augusta, as alreadysurmised in note16, p. 100. For "a Mr. Greignor," see note25, p. 181. "AMr. Veau" is Jacques Vieau or De Veau, b. 1757, d. 1852: see W. H. S. C.,XI. p. 218. The October date above is provokingly blank for the day ofthe month. But I construe the passage to mean that the place where Pikenow is, Apr. 9th, is also the place where Mr. Porlier’s brother and Mr.Veau had wintered 1805-6. If so, we may query Oct. 4th as the missing date;for though Pike does not say that his camp that day was on an island, theposition of Dimick’s isl., to which we then brought him, is such that he can easilymake Rum r. by 7 a. m. to-morrow, if he keeps on "some time" after leavingthe island in question, as he says he does.

[III-30] Pike twice passed directly by Dayton bluff, in which this cave was situated — onceSept. 21st, 1805, and again to-day: see back, note72, p. 75, for the locality,and add: The cave which Carver discovered in 1766 is thus described by him, pp.39, 40, ed. of 1796: "About 30 [say 15] miles below the Falls of St. Anthony,at which I arrived the 10th day after I left Lake Pepin, is a remarkable cave ofan amazing depth. The Indians term it Wakon-teebe, that is, the Dwelling ofthe Great Spirit. The entrance into it is about 10 feet wide, the height of it 5feet. The arch within is near 15 feet high, and about 30 feet broad. Thebottom of it consists of clear sand. About 20 feet from the entrance begins alake, the water of which is transparent, and extends to an unsearchable distance;for the darkness of the cave prevents all attempts to acquire a knowledge of it.I threw a small pebble towards the interior parts of is [it], with my utmoststrength: I could hear that it fell into the water, and notwithstanding it was ofso small a size, it caused an astonishing and horrible noise, that reverberated through all those gloomy regions. I found in this cave many Indian hieroglyphics, which appeared very ancient, for time had nearly covered them with moss, sothat it was with difficulty I could trace them. They were cut in a rude mannerupon the inside of the walls, which were composed of a stone so extremely softthat it might easily be penetrated with a knife; a stone everywhere to be foundnear the Mississippi. The cave is only accessible by ascending a narrow, steeppassage, that lies near the brink of the river." Now it is easy to criticise suchan account, and those who wish to discredit this honest gentleman seize upon"amazing depth," "unsearchable distance," "horrible noise," etc. But that isunfair. These phrases are only Carver’s façon de parler of his subjective sensations;the objective reality is truthfully and recognizably described. Besides,one should be sure he is in Carver’s cave before he criticises the description — notget into another cave and then find fault with Carver because the wrongcave does not fit the right description, as our friend Schoolcraft did. The cavewhich Carver does not describe was not discovered till 1811. Long visited twoin 1817; in 1823 Long’s second party visited the New or Fountain cave, andKeating has left the matter in such clear light that the passage may be transcribed,I. p. 289, ed. of 1824: "Above this village [of Kapoja], there is acave which is much visited by the voyagers; we stopped to examine it, althoughit presents, in fact, but little to admire; it is formed in the sandstone, and is ofcourse destitute of those beautiful appearances, which characterize the cavernsin calcareous rock. It is the same which is described by Mr. Schoolcraft, whosename, as well as those of several of Governor Cass’ party we found carved inthe rock. In his account of it, Mr. Schoolcraft states it to be the cavern thatwas visited by Carver, but adds that ’it appears to have undergone a considerablealteration since that period.’ It appears from Major Long’s MSS. of 1817,that there are two caves, both of which he visited; the lower one was Carver’s;it was in 1817 very much reduced in size from the dimensions given by Carver;the opening into it was then so low, that the only way of entering it was bycreeping in a prostrate position. Our interpreter, who had accompanied MajorLong, told us that it was now closed up; it was probably near the cemeterywhich we have mentioned. The cavern which we visited, and which Mr. Schoolcraftdescribes, is situated five miles above; it was discovered in 1811, and iscalled the Fountain cave; there is a beautiful stream running through it," etc.I think very likely the cave Long visited in 1817, and thought to be Carver’s,was really the smaller one alongside Carver’s in Dayton bluff, of which I aminformed by my friend Mr. A. J. Hill, seeing how "much reduced in size fromthe dimensions given by Carver" he found it. Beltrami, II. pp. 191-193, goeson about Carver’s cave in a way which makes one think he entered no one ofthe three caves in this vicinity, but drew on his imagination for his descriptionafter reading up on the subject. He uses the phrase "cave of Trophonius,"and says that "the Sioux call this cave Whakoon-Thiiby" — a decidedly originalway of spelling it. Featherstonhaugh describes his visit of Sept. 12th, 1835, towhat he calls Carver’s cave, p. 257 of his Canoe Voyage, etc., pub. 1847. Nicollet,who is always to the point, speaks of two caves, one 4 and the other 8 m.below St. Peters, Rep. 1843, p. 72: "Both are in the sandstone, but at differentelevations. The former is on a level with the river, and is reached througha short ravine along the limpid streamlet that issues from it. Many authorshave thought this to be the cave described by Carver, but erroneously. Itwould, in fact, be only necessary to compare the locality with Carver’s description,to be at once convinced. The cave now referred to is of recent formation.The aged Sioux say that it did not exist formerly. It has to them no ceremonialassociation. They scarcely ever visit it, and there are none of their hieroglyphicsupon its sides or floor. It owes its formation to the dislocation anddecomposition of the upland limestone, which have left sloughy places; thewaters of which have penetrated into the sandstone, wearing it away, and givingorigin to the streamlet which issues from it. The location of this cave is on mymap designated as the new cave [New Cave]. The second, four miles belowthe former, is that described by Carver. Its entrance has been, for more than30 years, closed by the disintegrated débris of the limestone capping the sandstonein which it is located. On the 3d day of July, 1837, with the assistanceof Messrs. Campbell and Quinn — the former an interpreter for the Sioux, thelatter for the Chippeways — I set about clearing this entrance; which, by-the-bye,was no easy work; for, on the 5th we were about abandoning the job, when,unexpectedly, we found that we had made an opening into it; and although wehad not entirely disincumbered it of its rubbish, I saw enough to satisfy me ofthe accuracy of Carver’s description. The lake mentioned by him is there; butI could only see a segment of the cave, a portion of its roof being too near thesurface of the water to enable me to proceed any further. A Chippeway warriormade a long harangue on the occasion; throwing his knife into the lake asan offering to Wakan-tibi, the spirit of the grottoes. The ascent to the cave isby a rapid slope; and on the rocks that form a wall to the left, there are a numberof ancient Sioux hieroglyphics, that mean nothing more than to indicate thenames of Indians that have at various times visited this natural curiosity. Onleaving the cave and reaching the river, a stroll of a few yards to the left, by keeping close to the rocks, brought us upon a sweet, limpid and copious springwhich had remained for a long time unknown in consequence of the shingle andbrush that conceal its outlet. This is evidently the issue of the waters of Grottolake; and their abundance indicates that the lake is well fed, and doubtlessoccupies a considerable space within the mountain. On the high grounds abovethe cave there are some Indian mounds, to which the Indians belonging to thetribe of Mdewakantonwans formerly transported the bones of the deceasedmembers of their families," as is stated by Carver, Pike, Long, and many others.I am led into this long note partly for the purpose of setting history straight,and partly from the intrinsic interest of these Stygian caverns, which Pike passesto-day without notice, as hundreds now do every day and will do until theplaces are improved off the earth. The cave that Nicollet opened is the veritableone that Carver discovered; it is right on the railroad that skirts Dayton bluff,about a mile in an air-line from Union depot. The New or Fountain cave ismiles away, in Upper St. Paul, near the railroad bridge there, unless it has latelyyielded to the triumph of art over nature and been effaced. Mr. Hill writes fromSt. Paul, Mar. 18th, 1894: "Before the shaving off of Carver’s cave — or ratherbefore our civil war — the serpent on the roof on the right hand as you stood onthe brink of the waters was very plainly visible, and might have been traced byrubbing or otherwise; but this would have required scaffolding. It has beenremarked that the serpent was the totem of Ottahtongoomlishcah, one of theSioux chiefs of the ’Cave Treaty.’ I found by actual measurement that theextreme length of the lake was 110 feet, before any alteration of the surface hadoccurred." See also the article by Mr. Hill on Mounds, Minn. Hist. Soc. Coll.,VI. Pt. 2, 1891. J. Fletcher Williams, in Minn. Hist. Soc. Coll., I. 2d ed. 1872,p. 355, notes that there was little change in Carver’s cave in the course of a century,for it was much the same May 1st, 1867, when the Historical Society celebratedthe centennial of Carver’s purported treaty with the Sioux. "Withinthe past two years, however, sad changes have taken place. The St. Paul &Chicago Railroad, having condemned for their use the strip of land along theriver bank, including the bluff or cliff in which is the cave, have dug it downand nearly destroyed it. But a narrow cavity now remains to mark its site.The pool or lake is gone, and the limpid stream that flows through it now suppliesa railroad tank." But now, says Mr. Hill, "sand heaped from railroadcutting has again backed up the water into a pool, the receptacle of all filth."Mr. T. H. Lewis’ article, Cave-Drawings, Appleton’s Annual Cyclop., 1889, p.117 (reprint, p. 3), gives the exact position of both the Dayton bluff caves; thesmall one, 400 feet above Carver’s, is 50 feet N. E. of Commercial St., midwaybetween Plum and Cherry Sts., at the foot of the bluff; 35 feet long on the floor,as measured in 1889 to the edge of the water in the rear, 24 feet wide, 10 feethigh — thus about one-third as large as Carver’s. It had pictographs like thoseof Carver’s cave. None of those Carver mentions were ever copied; his cavewas in part demolished by grading when the railroad first came by, and in thecourse of time the walls were scribbled over by the ubiquitous army of idlersand tramps from whose vandalism no natural formation or artificial monumentin the world is secure.

[III-31] Literally Raven’s Nose. He is tabulated by Pike as Tatamane, Nez Corbeau,Raven Nose, and Wind that Walks (latter name a euphemism).

[III-32] "Dispunishable" is a good old word, though rare and now obsolete; but Pike uses it in the opposite of its meaning, which was simply "punishable" — forthe prefix dis- is here intensive, not reversive or nugatory. C. D. marksit obs., and cites in support of def. a passage from the last will of Dean Swift,in a clause of which "dispunishable of waste" occurs.

[III-33] Joseph Rolette, Sr. There were various persons of this surname, whose spelling varies as usual. Billon gives one Michel Rolette as a French soldierwho came from Fort Chartres to Laclede’s village (St. Louis) in 1764. Pike’s"Mr. Rollett" is the same man as Beltrami’s "Mr. Roulet," said in Beltrami’sbook, II. p. 174, to have been at Prairie du Chien in 1823, in the S. W. Co.The Minn. Hist. Coll., II. Part 2, 1864, 2d ed. 1881, p. 107, mentions "thenotorious Joseph Rolette, sen.," as at Prairie du Chien, in or about Feb.,1822. The memoir of Hercules M. Dousman, by General H. H. Sibley,Minn. Hist. Coll., III. 1870-80, p. 193, speaks of "the late Joseph Rolette,senior," as a partner of the American Fur Company, in 1826; again we readthere, p. 194: "In 1834 ... I formed with him [Dousman] and the lateJoseph Rolette, senior, a co-partnership with the American Fur Company ofNew York, which passed in that year under the direction of Ramsay Crooks asPresident"; and once more, ibid., p. 199: "In 1844, Col. Dousman wasunited in marriage to the widow of his former partner in business, Joseph Rolette, senior, who died some years previously."

[III-34] This letter was Doc. No. 11, p. 25 of the App. to Pt. 1 of the orig. ed. Itis given beyond.

[III-35] That is to say, certain ones of their nation who were murderers of somewhite men: see Apr. 17th. The minutes of this Winnebago conference formedDoc. No. 12, p. 26 of the App. to Pt. 1 of the orig. ed.; given beyond.

[III-36] Doc. No. 13, p. 29 of the App. to Pt. 1 of the orig. ed.; given beyond.

[III-37] On Pike’s Tabular Abstract, one Red Thunder, Tonnerre Rouge, orWuckiew Nutch, appears as a Sisseton and "first chief of all the Sioux"; whileRed Cloud, Nuage Rouge, or Muckpeanutah, is exhibited as first chief of theYanktons.

[III-38] James B. Many of Delaware, whose name occurs in Pike and elsewhere as Many, Maney, Manny, and Mary, also as Mancy in the text of 1807, was appointed first lieutenant of the 2d reg’t of Artillerists and Engineers June4th, 1798, and hence of Artillerists Apr. 1st, 1802; promoted to be captainOct. 1st, 1804, and major, May 5th, 1813; he was transferred to the corps ofArtillery May 12th, 1814, to the 4th Infantry June 1st, 1821, to the 5thInfantry Oct. 24th, 1821; on the 1st of Jan., 1822, he was made lieutenant-colonelof the 7th Infantry, to rank from June 1st, 1821; became colonel ofthe 2d Infantry July 21st, 1834, and died Feb. 23d, 1852.

[III-39] Pigeons are among the least fecund of birds, as they lay only two eggs ata clutch, and that not oftener than most other birds. But Pike’s account of theirvast numbers is not in the least exaggerated. The aggregate of individuals inexistence in the United States during those and for many later years defies allattempt at calculation. Some single flights have been estimated to includemillions. The settlement of the country, and consequent wanton destructionduring our generation, have exterminated the wild pigeon in some regions, andreduced to comparatively few its numbers in others.

[III-40] Daniel Hughes of Maryland originally entered the army as an ensign of the 9th Infantry, Jan. 8th, 1799; became a lieutenant that year, and was honorablydischarged June 15th, 1800. He was reappointed second lieutenant of the2d Infantry Feb. 16th, 1801, and transferred to the 1st Infantry Apr. 1st, 1802;promoted to be first lieutenant Mar. 23d, 1805, and captain Dec. 15th, 1808;became major of the 2d Infantry Feb. 21st, 1814, and was honorably dischargedJune 15th, 1815. His subsequent career is not known to me.

[III-41] A sketch of the early history of St. Louis forms pp. 75-92 of Nicollet’s Reportof 1843, so often cited in the foregoing notes. It will be well to abstracthere the main historical points of this article, which is not so well known aseverything that Nicollet wrote should be. Some of the following items are adducedfrom other sources, as Billon’s Annals. Louisiana was ceded by Franceto Spain, Treaty of Fontainebleau, Nov. 3d, 1762, ratified Nov. 13th; and byTreaty of Paris, Feb. 10th, 1763, France and Spain jointly made the cession toGreat Britain. In 1762 or 1763 D’Abadie was director-general of Louisianaad interim, vice Governor Kerlerec, relieved. He licensed Laclede, Maxent(or Maxam) and Co., merchants of New Orleans, to trade up the river. PierreLigueste Laclede, in charge of the party, left New Orleans Aug. 3d, 1763; proceededto St. Genevieve and Fort Chartres, Nov. 3d; to the mouth of the Missouriin Dec.; blazed a site for his trading-post, now St. Louis; and returnedto winter at Fort Chartres, 1763-64. He soon sent to the spot he had marked aboat with 30 persons, in charge of Auguste Chouteau; they arrived Feb. 15th,1764 (so Nicollet), or Mar. 14th (Chouteau himself says). The list of the"Thirty Associates" of Laclede given by Billon, p. 17, is 31, with AntoineRiviere, who, however, did not go in this boat, but drove the cart which containedMrs. Chouteau and four children, and which was escorted by Laclede inperson. Chouteau says that Laclede came there early in April, selected a sitefor his own house, and returned to Fort Chartres. He brought his familyin September, and established himself in his new house. The settlement wasmade, and at least eight persons were added to the original number by thefall of 1764. The original name was Laclede’s Village. In Oct., 1764, theinfant colony was annoyed by begging and pilfering Missouri Indians. D’Abadiedied Feb. 4th, 1765. Neyon de Villiers had turned over the command ofFort Chartres, June 15th, 1764, to Louis St. Ange de Bellerive, by whom itwas given over to the British Captain Stirling, Oct. 10th (not July 17th), 1765;Stirling died in three months, and St. Ange resumed temporary charge of thefort, pending arrival of Stirling’s English successor. British dominion E. of theMississippi, already established, was odious; it drove many persons acrossthe river, and naturally they gathered about the nucleus Laclede had provided.By the end of 1765 several hundred were there; law was needed, anda provisional government was set up by general consent in the election or recognitionof St. Ange as governor; this was in effect in April, 1766, with thefirst recorded document of a public character; first on record being one filed byJoseph Labusciere, notary, Jan. 21st, 1766. Laclede, St. Ange, Labusciere,and Judge Joseph Le Febvre d’Inglebert d’Brouisseau were the four personsmost prominent in moving the wheels of government for four or five years.The settlement had already outgrown all the earlier ones in the vicinity andbecome the actual "metropolis" or capital place in the country. In 1767the village had perhaps 80 houses, and several hundred people. Late that yearCapt. Francisco Rios or Rivers arrived with some 25 men, sent by DonAntonio d’ Ulloa to take Spanish possession; he could not be convenientlyaccommodated, so selected a camp on the Missouri, 14 miles away, where hebuilt in 1768 Fort Charles the Prince (site of subsequent Belle Fontaine), namedfor the one who became in 1788 Charles IV. of Spain. Definitive possession ofUpper Louisiana was taken May 20th, 1770, by Capt. Piedro Piernas, sent fromNew Orleans by Gen. Alex. O’Reilly (Oreiley of Nicollet), who had landedthere at 5 p. m., Aug. 18th, 1769. At the close of the French régime, 1770,the village had 100 wooden and 15 stone houses; pop. 500. Before or about1770, some other settlements were made in the region roundabout; Blanchettethe hunter built his shack on les Petites Côtes, and this place became St.Charles in 1784; the place to be called both Florissant and St. Ferdinandwas started by François Borosier Dunegan (so Nicollet — but query this name — )François Saucier settled at Portage des Sioux. The origin of the name PainCourt is said to be: In 1767, one Delor Détergette settled on the W. bankof the Miss. r., 6 m. S. of St. Louis, and was followed by others, all sopoor that when they visited St. Louis, the people there would exclaim, "voilà lespoches vides qui viennent!" "Here come the Empty Pockets!" "But," saysNicollet, "on one occasion a wag remarked, ’You had better call them emptiers of pockets’ — les Vide-poches; a compliment which was retaliated by themupon the place of St. Louis, which was subject to frequent seasons of want, bystyling it Pain-CourtShort of Bread." The Vide-poche place became Carondeletin 1776. Laclede died at the Poste aux Arkansas, June 20th, 1778.On May 6th, 1780, St. Louis was attacked by Indians and British, and manypersons (accounts differ as to numbers) were killed or captured; it becameknown as l’Année du Grand Coup — year of the great blow. Similarly 1785was called l’Année des Grandes Eaux, because of the flood in April when theMississippi rose to an unprecedented height and inundated the lowlands; itis traditional that Auguste Chouteau moored his boat and breakfasted on topof the highest roof in St. Genevieve. The year 1788 was called L’Année desDix Batteaux, from circumstances of piracy on the river. The winter of1789-90 was notable for its intensity. There was no interruption of Spanishdominion until the cession of Louisiana to the United States: see Lewis andClark, ed. 1893, p. xxxiii. and p. 2.

[IV-1] In the orig. ed. these Tables made five unpaged leaves, bound to followblank p. 106, and thus were appended to the main text of Pike’s itinerary, notput in the Appendix to Part I. It really makes little difference where theseTables go, as nobody ever reads such matter. I leave them where I find them,on the general principle of interfering as little as possible with the original compositionof the book, simply introducing a chapter-head for their accommodation;and shall pass this thrilling chapter without further remark.

[V-1] Under this head I bring all the matter which formed in the orig. ed. the first16 pieces, Nos. 1-16, pp. 1-34 of the Appendix to Pt. 1. These fall easily together, as they consist entirely of letters Pike wrote or received during hisMississippi Expedition — even the reports of his Indian councils being actually apart of his correspondence with General Wilkinson. I am also able to followthe original sequence of the pieces, with the single exception of orig. No. 16(instructions to Kennerman), which Pike put last and I bring into chronologicalorder of dates. The difference of my Arts. 1-18 from Pike’s Nos. 1-16 resultsfrom my Art. 3, which had no number in the orig. ed. (it being merely an inclosurein Pike’s No. 2), and my Art. 5, the Sioux treaty, which Pike did notseparate by any sort of mark from his No. 3, though it is by far the most importantpiece of this whole lot. The changes I make affect the numerationafter No. 2, but not the sequence in any case except that of my Art. 7 (Pike’sNo. 16). I indicate the original numeration and pagination.

[V-2] There were three persons of this name down to 1805. Louis TessonHonoré 1st, tailor, b. Canada, 1734, d. St. Louis, 1807, aged 73; married Magdalena Peterson, b. 1739, d. St. Louis, 1812. The family came to St.Louis from Kaskaskia. Among 8 children was — Louis Tesson Honoré 2d,eldest son; he married (1) Marie Duchouquette, (2) Theresa Creely, in 1788;by the latter he had Louis Tesson Honoré 3d, b. St. Louis about 1790; marriedAmaranthe Dumoulin; d. there Aug. 20th, 1827. The one Pike nameswas no doubt No. 2.

[V-3] This piece is the inclosure mentioned in Art. 2. In the orig. ed. it had nonumber, and occupied p. 5.

[V-4] Doc. No. 3, p. 6-9, of the orig. ed. was printed in a peculiarly misleadingmanner. In the first place it was headed in capitals, "Conferences held withdifferent bands of Indians, on a voyage up the Mississippi, in the years 1805and 1806," though it was entirely occupied with a single such conference, namely,that with the Sioux, of Sept. 23d, 1805. In the second place, this major headwas followed by an italicised minor head which properly covered only Pike’sspeech on the occasion, yet included the important terms of the treaty effected,as the latter was tacked on to Pike’s speech without any separate heading,and even without any break in the text. We must therefore break orig. Doc.No. 3 into two pieces, to be enumerated as Art. 4 and Art. 5. For theformer of these, which is Pike’s speech, the orig. minor head of Doc. No.3 may be retained. For the latter of these, which is the Sioux treaty, a newhead must be supplied; especially as this is by far the most important resultof Pike’s Mississippi voyage — perhaps more important than all the rest collectively — concerningwhich there is a great deal to be said.

[V-5] Who the "father" may be whom Pike imposes upon the Indians in his variouspowwows is not always clear. Sometimes President Jefferson appears to beindicated; sometimes General Wilkinson; sometimes Pike himself. In thepresent instance it is General Wilkinson, and the Osage mission in mention isthat upon which Lieutenant George Peter had been detailed by the general.This appears in a letter from General Wilkinson to the Secretary of War, datedSt. Louis, Aug. 25th, 1805, now on file in the War Department, and in the followingextract: "I find our parties under Lieuts. Pike and Peter are makingrapid progress on their routes. Pike had ascended the Mississippi 150 miles onthe fifth day after he left this place, and I have just received a letter from Peters[sic] dated the 19th inst., 150 miles up the Osage River, altho’ he left St.Charles, 25 miles from the mouth of the Missouri, on the 10th inst. and hadbeen obstructed by almost incessant rains and consequent high waters. He ischarmed with the river and its banks, which He reports to be far superiorto those of the Ohio in beauty and fertility — Independent of the immediateobjects of these parties, they serve to instruct our young officers and also oursoldiery, on subjects which may hereafter become interesting to the UnitedStates." George Peter of Maryland was appointed from the District ofColumbia to be a second lieutenant of the 9th Infantry, July 12th, 1799,and honorably discharged June 15th, 1800; he was appointed lieutenant ofArtillerists and Engineers, Feb. 16th, 1801; of Artillerists, Apr. 1st, 1802;became captain, Nov. 3d, 1807; was transferred to the Light Artillery inMay, 1808; resigned, June 11th, 1809; and died June 22d, 1861.

[V-6]As explained in note1, p. 221, this article requires separation from Art. 4,from which it is totally distinct, though the two form undistinguished parts ofone Doc. No. 3, of the orig. ed. I accordingly set them apart, and supply anew heading for Art. 5; but I reprint the latter precisely as it stands in theorig. ed., for reasons which will presently appear. As originally drafted byPike, and by him communicated to General Wilkinson under cover of a letterof equal date, it appears to have been "scarcely legible," as the general informsthe Secretary of War in a letter before me (see Art. 6). I doubt that this extraordinarydocument ever existed in a form which might not be set aside as fatallydefective; and I do not doubt that we acquired legal title to the lands by somemeans subsequent to this invalid instrument. The probability is that upon dueand sufficient investigation of points of law involved it would appear that thesupposed cession of lands was not a legally accomplished fact until made suchby later negotiation or legislation, with which we have here nothing to do. Thefollowing argument concerning Pike’s treaty, as simply a starting-point for furthersteps in the transaction, was submitted in the press-proofs to my relativeJames M. Flower, Esq., of Chicago, who had no material modification tosuggest.

Let us first examine that version of the document which Pike presents uponhis own page, and which is therefore presumably authentic.

1. The preamble recites that a conference was held "between the UnitedStates of America and the Sioux nation of Indians." But it does not appearthat either of the alleged parties to the transaction was officially and legally represented. The Sioux nation consisted in 1805 of at least seven tribes, onlyone of which was concerned in the affair; and if only the consent of this onetribe was required to effect the cession the conference is erroneously described.Furthermore, it does not appear by what authority Pike assumed to representthe United States. He signs himself "agent" at the conference. Agent ofwhom or of what — He was certainly not an Indian agent, empowered by theUnited States to effect treaties with aliens; and though it is true that he wasinstructed by his military superior to obtain if possible certain cessions, amongwhich was the cession of land at and near the mouth of St. Peter’s r., thequestion recurs whether General Wilkinson was competent to issue militaryorders to that effect without the authority of the government; and no suchauthority is expressed or necessarily implied in the terms of the alleged treaty.

2. Art. 1, which ostensibly declares what lands were supposed to be ceded,does in fact declare or describe no such lands sufficiently or recognizably, andis furthermore vitiated by a blunder which would constitute a fatal flaw in thetitle, if contested. (a) "Nine miles square at the mouth of the St. Croix," isin the first place an impossibility, because the mouth of the St. Croix has nosuch dimensions; and in the second place may mean either a tract of 81 squaremiles, whose center is at the mouth of the said river, or any one of four ormore square tracts of the said extent, any one of whose angles, or any indeterminedpoint of one of whose sides, is at the mouth of the said river; and in no one ofthese contingencies is the direction in which the remaining bounds are to belaid off described either by points of the compass or by natural landmarks. (b)The asterisk set at the words "St. Croix" refers to a memorandum whichPike causes to appear as a clause of the treaty itself, interpolated of his ownmotion, without the knowledge or consent of the other party to the transaction;it is also unintelligible on its face. "My demand was one league below." Belowwhat — Below the mouth of the St. Croix — That would be the obvious inference;but it would be erroneous to so infer. "Their reply was ’from below.’"This is absolutely unintelligible as it stands; it has no meaning whatever. "Iimagine (without iniquity) they may be made to agree." Is it Pike’s imaginationthat is without iniquity — Or is it some agreement that may be broughtabout without iniquity between his demands and the terms of the cession — Oris it the Indians who can without iniquity be made to agree with a demandthat conflicts with the terms of the cession as understood by them — In point offact, however, this interpolated clause of the treaty, or interpolated memorandumrelating to the terms of the cession, has nothing whatever to do with thelands at or near the St. Croix r., because the asterisk which points out the placeof the interpolation is misplaced by error of the types. The words which stand"St. Croix,* also from," etc., should stand "St. Croix. *Also from," etc.The printer foiled Pike’s intention of placing the asterisk at the beginning ofthe clause to which it pertains, by setting it at the end of the preceding clause,to which it does not pertain.

3. Now making the actually required transference of the asterisk to its properand intended position (where it stands correctly on a manuscript copy of theorig. doc. now before me), the whole difficulty which this obnoxious interpolation occasions is shifted to a much more important clause of the treaty, uponwhich it remains in full force. Accordingly we find that this most importantclause beginning "*Also from below," etc., includes an irreconcilable discrepancybetween Pike’s demand and the Indians’ concession. He appears to havedemanded that the tract of land ceded should begin "one league" below theconfluence of St. Peter’s with the Mississippi r.; and the Indians appear tohave agreed, not to this demand, but to a cession of a tract of land which shouldbegin "from below" the said confluence; though how far "from below" is notsaid, and there is nothing to show whether the distance should be more or lessthan the "one league" which Pike demanded and to which the Indians did notagree. But it is impossible, either with or without "iniquity," to come toany incontestable conclusion concerning a boundary so unintelligibly indicated.The most we can do is to "imagine," as Pike did, that what the Indians werewilling to cede and did in fact cede by the terms of the treaty, was a tract whichbegan on one side at no appreciable or no considerable distance below the saidconfluence, i. e., exactly or immediately at the mouth of St. Peter’s r. This is areasonable and natural, if not the only, inference to be drawn from the obscureand scarcely intelligible terms of the article in question; and I believe that suchhas always been the assumption of its true purport. The initial point assumed,then, is the mouth of St. Peter’s r.; but the article does not show in what, ifany, direction a line is to be drawn through this point for the purpose of establishinga practicable boundary. No line can be determined by fewer than twopoints; yet the article specifies no second point to or from which a line may bedrawn from or to the mouth of St. Peter’s r. to represent one side of the tractsupposed to have been ceded. The further terms of the article throw no lighton the case. These terms are only "to include the falls of St. Anthony,extending nine miles on each side of the river." This clause of the cession doesnot specify which one of the two said rivers the Falls of St. Anthony extendnine miles on each side of, and it is also a natural impossibility for the said fallsto extend any miles on either side of any river. Seeking some other constructionto be put upon terms which are obviously absurd if taken literally, we dragfrom obscurity a semblance of meaning they may be assumed to have. Thismeaning is, that the tract of land ceded does to all intent and purpose extendfrom a point at the mouth of St. Peter’s r. to some point in or on the Mississippir., at or beyond the Falls of St. Anthony; but to what point is not specified.However, we may assume that the phrase "to include the falls of St.Anthony" is to be construed to include no more than these falls. This assumptiongives us a second datum-point of the required boundary, but does not inany way assist us to an intelligible connection between the first point and thesecond one, along which any line can be drawn as a boundary. This deficiencyof any line whatever may be assumed to be supplied by the only remainingclause of the article, namely, "extending nine miles on each side of the river."But in what direction are nine miles on each side of the river to be taken — Foranything that appears to the contrary, the distance between the mouth of St.Peter’s r. and the Falls of St. Anthony may be nine miles, and there is nothingin the terms of the article which forbids the measurement of nine miles to bemade up each side of the Mississippi from the mouth of St. Peter’s r. to theFalls of St. Anthony, and as much further as nine miles may be found to reach.On such assumption, the cession included only a section of the Mississippi r.,and not any land on either side of this river beyond its immediate banks; allthat was ceded by the Sioux being in such event a waterway and a waterpower.To claim as ours by the terms of the treaty any land on either side of the river,we have to proceed upon yet another assumption, namely, that the nine miles inquestion were to be measured in a direction away from the river "on each side."But even assuming such to have been the intent and purport of the article, severalfurther questions arise. The first of these concerns the meaning of the word"each" in its present connection. This word means either one of two or morethings in their reciprocal relation, and thus implies both; in the present instance,as a river has only two sides, "each side" means both sides. It is clear that adistance of nine miles is to be measured away from each side of the river, i. e.,is to include some distance on both sides of the river; but the terms of thearticle do not state whether the whole of nine miles’ distance from one side ofthe river, and the whole of nine miles’ distance from the other side of the river,was ceded, or whether a part of these nine miles on one side and the rest ofthese nine miles on the other was ceded; or, in the latter case, what part ofthese nine miles on one side and what part of these nine miles on the other sidewere ceded. In other words, is the tract of land ceded eighteen miles wide, oronly nine miles wide — In the former case it would of course lie in two equaltracts, one on each side of the river; in the latter case, its location would bewholly indeterminate (within certain obvious limitations); for it might be fourand a half miles on each side, or four miles on one side and five on the other,and so on. Even were all the foregoing questions settled — arbitrarily, conventionally,or otherwise — yet others would arise. Among these would bethe shape of the two lateral boundaries of the tract of land. This tract isdescribed as "extending nine miles on each side of the river." That is, eachboundary furthest from the river is to be at the same distance from its own sideof the river at every point of its own extent. This requires that these boundsshould be parallel with each other, and such parallelism involves the meanderingof two lines parallel at every point with the meanders of the river. Assumingthat this were satisfactorily done, it would still be impossible to determine theconnection of these two sides of a theoretical tract of land with the other two sidesrequired for actual boundary. For there is nothing in the article to show thedirection in which either the line which crosses the mouth of St. Peter’s r.,or the line which crosses the Falls of St. Anthony, is to be extended to intersectany lines, however the latter may have been projected. We are forced to yetfurther assumptions, for which the terms of the cession give no warrant whatever. No determinable shape is given to the tract of land by the terms of thecession. If we assume that a square was intended — as was expressly the intentionin the case of the land about the mouth of the St. Croix — we are confrontedwith some terms of the article which put a square out of the question. By theseterms the land can only be a square in case the mouth of the St. Peter’s r. benine miles below the Falls of St. Anthony, and in the further case that wemeasure four and a half miles from one and four and a half miles from theother side of the Mississippi, and make all connections at right angles by meansof right lines. It is needless to push the difficulty further. Nothing of this sort,we may be sure, was in the minds of the Sioux at the time, and it may bedoubted that anything of the sort occurred to Pike. The patent fact remainsthat even if both parties to the transaction were competent to execute the instrumentby which certain lands were ceded, neither the situation, nor the shape,nor the size of the tract ceded can be determined from the article of the treatyrelating thereto. How the cession thus left in the air may have been subsequentlydetermined, it is not to my present purpose to inquire. My contentionis simply that we acquired by Article 1 of this famous treaty no tract or tracts ofland which can be located according to the terms of the article; and that ifthere be not a cloud upon the title to every foot of land between and includingFort Snelling and Minneapolis, and for some distance on each side of thoseplaces, then such cloud has been removed by legislative or other action subsequentto the supposed cession. It will also be remembered by those interested in such things that the question has been raised whether the Sioux who seem to have ceded this land to us had at the time a clear title to it; for Carver claimed,and some of his heirs have since sought to establish his claim, that the Siouxhad at one time made over to him, for a valuable consideration, certain lands supposed to be the same, wholly or in part, as those which they made over to Pike. This case I understand was tried, and decided adversely in law; whether it be not a good case in equity is another question.

4. With the competency of both parties to the transaction brought into question,and with the size, shape, and situation of the land-grant shown to be indeterminable,we have next to consider whether Article 2 does not invalidate, vitiate, or void the whole instrument. In the version which Pike’s printer offers us, itreads: "Art. 2. That in consideration of the above grants, the United Statesshall pay (filled up by the senate with 2000 dollars)." This is simply ridiculous.By the terms of Article 2, the valuable consideration which the Sioux receivedis an imaginary nonentity described as "(filled up by the senate with 2000dollars)." However, this absurdity in the wording of an international documentis so clearly due to the heedlessness of an inexperienced young officer, andwhat Pike meant by such phraseology is so obvious, that we can let it go withonly the further remark that the purport of Article 2, as it stands on his page,is clearer than anything in Article 1. For it is an obvious editorial interpolationof his own, forming no part of the original document, but simply intendedto inform the reader that at some time subsequent to the execution of the instrumentby the contracting parties, the Senate of the United States voted to fill upa place which had been left blank in the original document with a clause whichprovided that the United States should pay $2,000 to the Indians in considerationof the grant which the latter had made. But this very fact goes far toshow that the instrument was in the first place fatally defective, no valuable orany consideration whatever having been originally expressed or implied in theterms of Article 2. On this point I have carefully examined two manuscriptcopies of the "treaty," both made soon after the transaction in question, andboth now on file in the War Department. One of the manuscripts reads:"Article 2nd. — That in consideration of the above Grants, the United States"The other manuscript reads: "Art. 2d That in consideration of the abovegrants the U. S." A third version of Article 2, in an official imprint of thetreaty, published by the Indian Bureau, is: "Article 2. That in considerationof the above grants the United States ******" Whence itappears that the words "shall pay," which occur in the version our youngfriend offers in his book, were also an editorial invention of his own; there isno hint in the original instrument that the United States was to pay anything.For anything that appears to the contrary, the United States might havedeclared war with England, or amended the Constitution, or done nothing, inconsideration of the above grant. Pike could give the Indians no assurancethat the United States would do anything whatever — that they would evenaccept the lands as a gift, because he had no knowledge of future Acts ofCongress, and no authority to make any stipulations which should be bindingon the government. What is perhaps the most extraordinary thing about thisextraordinary transaction is that Pike informs Wilkinson by letter of equal datethat lands to the extent of about 100,000 acres had been obtained "for asong"; calls the general’s attention pointedly to the fact "that the 2d article,relative to consideration, is blank;" that the "song" in mention was worthabout $250, being the value of certain presents with which he had personallyand privately feed the two chiefs who signed the treaty, these presents beingpartly from articles of his personal property; and suggests to the general"to insert the amount of those articles as the considerations to bespecified in article 2d." General Wilkinson expresses unfeigned surprise atthis, in a letter before me addressed to the Secretary of War, dated St. Louis,Nov. 26th, 1805, in which he says: "You have a copy of the agreement undercover, in which, for what reason I cannot divine, he [Pike] omits the stipulationon the part of the United States;" and again, after quoting some clausesof Pike’s letter to himself, he remarks: "I do not fairly comprehend thisreasoning, but I dare say Mr. Pike will be able to explain it satisfactorily, tho’it is unquestionable he is a much abler soldier than negotiator." We neednot take the view that this was a shady transaction; yet if Wilkinson hadinserted $250 as the consideration to be paid for the land, no more than thiscould have been claimed by the Sioux, and as this was in part Pike’s personalproperty, some land would have been his own unless he had chosen to make itover to the United States on being reimbursed in a like amount — that is, ifsuch a treaty was worth any more than the paper on which it was written.The facts appear to be that Pike hobnobbed with two chiefs till he got them tomake him a present of the land he wanted, in consideration of some presentswhich he had already made to these two Indians privately.

5. The third article of the treaty is intelligible, though it is not clear what"exceptions" were "specified" in Article 1, as recited in Article 3. The purport seems to be that the Sioux should retain right of way in the land, and such other use of it as should not be abridged or nullified by our occupation.At the same time it is not clear that, since the United States were to have "fullsovereignty and power," by the terms of Article 1, they were not authorized towithdraw all the privileges of Article 3 if they saw fit to do so.

6. The question of the validity of many legal documents is affected by thepresence or absence of witnesses to the same. In the present case no signatures of witnesses appear on the face of the instrument, and there is nothing whatever to show that it is anything more than a part of a speech which Pike made to certainIndians, and which two of them subscribed besides himself. None of thepublished versions of the "treaty" which I have seen includes this importantfeature. But one of the manuscript copies before me has the names of fourpersons as witnesses, all whites. Reference to the second paragraph of Pike’sspeech will show him to have spoken of "a form of agreement which we willboth sign in the presence of the traders now present." Four names which appearon the face of the manuscript copy just mentioned, in the usual place ofwitnesses’ signatures, and under a word which I make out to be "Tests," (i. e.,teste or testibus, in the ablative sing. or pl.) are: Wm. Meyer, M[urdoch]Cameron, James Frazer, Duncan Graham. It is remarkable that, if these namesappear on the original document, they were not transcribed on all the copies, andalso printed with the published versions, as an integral part of the same.

7. The names of the two chiefs who are supposed to have "touched thequill" to this transaction, i. e., signed with their respective marks, occur invariant forms in the several copies; but this is the rule in such cases, and has no significance except of clerical incompetency. In the officially publishedversion above mentioned the two names stand "Le Petit Carbeau" and "WayAga Enagee," each of which only differs by one letter from the correct form(in the case of the French) or from a usual form (in the case of the Sioux).Each of these chiefs has been already identified: see note2, p. 85 and p. 86.

The subsequent history of this mock instrument or valid document is notless singular than the conditions and circumstances under which it originated. Diligent search for it among the treaties duly published in the U. S. Statutesat Large fails to show that it was ever included in that collection of officialpapers. But certain facts were furnished, with the text of the treaty itself,to the Indian Bureau by Mr. C. C. Royce of the Bureau of Ethnologyat Washington, and printed by the former Bureau in an editorial noteexplanatory of that text, on p. 316 of its official publication entitled "Lawsof the United States relating to Indian Affairs," etc., Washington, GovernmentPrinting Office, 1884. It appears in this place that the treaty (insome form) was submitted by the President to the Senate, March 29th,1808, thus more than two years after the execution of the instrument in writing;that the Senate reported favorably upon it April 13th, 1808, with thefollowing amendment to fill the blank in Article 2: "After the word ’States’in the second article insert the following words: ’shall, prior to taking possessionthereof, pay to the Sioux two thousand dollars, or deliver the value thereofin such goods and merchandise as they shall choose.’" With this amendmentthe Senate unanimously advised and consented to its ratification, April 16th,1808. Examination of the records of the State Department fails to disclose thatany subsequent action was taken by the President; and the ratification of thetreaty does not appear to have ever been proclaimed. This is a very unusualcircumstance; for such treaties ordinarily have three official dates of as manystages in their progress from inception to full effect, viz.: date of agreementbetween the contracting parties; date of ratification by the proper authority;and date of proclamation by the President. In the present case the principalevidence that the alleged cession of lands was ever a legally accomplished factis said by Mr. Royce to consist in certain correspondence of the War Departmentmore than twenty-five years after the date of ratification of the amendedtreaty by the Senate. But that the cession was effected, legally or otherwise, iscertain. In 1819 Major Thomas Forsyth, Indian Agent at St. Louis, hadreceived instructions from the War Department to deliver "a certain quantity ofgoods, say $2,000 worth," "in payment of lands ceded by the Sioux Indians tothe late Gen. Pike for the United States": see Forsyth’s Narrative, as orig.pub. in Wis. Hist. Coll., 1872, with notes by Lyman C. Draper, and repub. inMinn. Hist. Coll., III. 1874, pp. 139-67. Yet we find General H. H. Sibleysaying, ibid., p. 174: "In the year 1821, Col. Leavenworth called together thechiefs and head men of the Sioux bands, and procured from them a grant ofland nine miles square at the junction of the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers."What can one make of such conflicting statements — Here it is said thatColonel Leavenworth procured in 1821 a grant of land which Major Forsyth issaid to have paid for in 1819, and which Pike is said to have secured in 1805.In the same place General Sibley says that there was an article in the Leavenworth-Siouxtreaty of 1821 by which the Indians "donated" Pike’s isl. to Mr.J. B. Faribault.

[V-7] "The within articles" are those of the Sioux Treaty of same date, inclosedin this letter to General Wilkinson, which reached St. Louis on or about Nov.26th, 1805, and was immediately communicated in full to the Secretary of War.A manuscript copy of the original is on file in the Record Division of the WarDepartment, together with two copies of General Wilkinson’s own letter toGeneral Dearborn on the same subject and other topics. I might reproduce themanuscript of Pike’s letter textually, but as the copy before me is in a clerk’shand, its peculiarities being thus not Pike’s own, it is not worth while to replacethe above fair imprint of the original with another version which would show nodifference except in its clerical errors. See preceding article for a criticism ofthe treaty itself which formed the inclosure of the present letter. One passagefrom General Wilkinson’s unpublished letter to the Secretary of War may behere cited: "He [Pike] tells me he has no doubt of being able to make LakeSable in pretty good Season, but observes that the source of the River is in’Lake Sang Sue,’ about sixty Leagues further North & that He must ’see thatalso’ — in which case he will have stretched his orders & we shall not hear ofHim before the Spring — He reports that our flag is every where received withpleasure, & that he had patched up a Peace between the Scioux & Chepaways,who are generally at War — — "

[V-8] This is the "Original Leve" of p. 85 — the chief whose name would be in English Standing Elk or Standing Moose: see note2, p. 87. — ‰lan is Frenchfor such an animal; it is the same word as the Dutch eland, which we have borrowedfor a South African species.

[V-9] "Mareir" and "Tremer" are both wrong, no doubt, but I do not know whatthe right names are. A clerk’s copy of the original letter before me has "Mercier"and "Fener" — latter perhaps François Fennai: cf. W. H. S. C., XII. p. 160.

[V-10] Article 7 was misplaced in the orig. ed. as No. 16, being brought in at theend of all the rest of the correspondence. I transfer it to its present proper place in chronological sequence of these documents. It requires no comment,being simply the written orders which the commanding officer gave his sergeantfor the guidance of the latter during the former’s absence, and which Kennermanproceeded to disobey in general and in particular.

[V-11] The first visit of white men to the Mandans was made in 1738, under theleadership of Pierre Gaultier de Varennes, otherwise Le Sieur Verendrye. Arelation of this journey, by Rev. Dr. Edward D. Neill, occupies pp. 113-119 ofthe Macalester College Contributions, Department of History, Literature, andPolitical Science, Second Series, No. 5, which I extract in substance, as follows:

On Sept. 24th, 1738, Verendrye was at the confluence of the Red River ofthe North with the Assiniboine r. Two days afterward he began his journeyup the latter, and on the 30th, having found a suitable place, he establishedFort La Reine. Within a week, Mgr. de La Marque (otherwise CharlesNolan, Noland, or Nolant, son of J. B. Nolan and Marie Anne La Marque,b. 1694), and his brother, Sieur Nolan, with eight men, arrived in two canoesfrom Mackinac. On Oct. 16th Verendrye selected 10 of his own men and 10 ofLa Marque’s party for the Mandan expedition, and their march began on the18th. The party consisted of Verendrye, with two of his sons; La Marqueand his brother Nolan; together with some voyageurs and Indians — in all 52persons. On the 21st, at the distance of 26 leagues from Fort La Reine, theyreached the first (no doubt Turtle) mountain. After slow marches southwestwardly,the first Mandans were met on the morning of the 28th. A chief cameand stood near Verendrye, and one of his band presented corn on the cob andsome tobacco. These Indians were only covered with a buffalo-robe, wearingno breech-clout. The Mandan chief requested the French to visit his village,and left on the 30th, accompanied by about 600 Indians. On the evening of thethird day’s march an Assiniboine, one of a number of this tribe who had alreadyjoined the expedition, stole a bag containing Verendrye’s papers and othervaluables; two men were hired to pursue the thief, and they captured him. Onthe morning of the fourth day’s march camp was broken early in order to reachthe Mandan settlement. A short distance from the village they were met on anelevation by a delegation of Mandans, who presented the calumet. Verendryedirected his son, the chevalier, to draw up the French in line, place the flag ofFrance four paces before them, and fire three volleys. At 4 p. m., Dec. 3d,Verendrye and his associates entered the village and were conducted to the lodgeof the principal chief, where a bag containing presents, and also 300 livres, wasstolen. The Assiniboines were much afraid of the Sioux, from whom they hadseparated years before, and the Mandans, not wishing to entertain Verendrye’sescort, purposely raised a rumor that the Sioux were coming, whereupon theAssiniboines decamped. Verendrye was embarrassed for want of a good interpreter,but learned that on the banks of the Missouri, lower down, were thePananas, and then the Pananis, at war with each other. Six days after theAssiniboines decamped, Chevalier Verendrye, Sieur Nolan, six Frenchmen,and several Mandans visited a settlement on the bank of the river, and thenSieur Verendrye and Mgr. de La Marque inspected the village. There were 130cabins. A fort was built on an elevation in the open prairie, surrounded by aditch about 15 feet deep and from 15 to 18 feet wide. (Compare A. J. Hill’splot of Mandan fortification, in T. H. Lewis’ Minor Antiq. Art. No. iv, p. 5,1884.) The cabins were spacious, separated into several apartments by thickplanks, and goods were hung on posts in large bags. The men were naked,covered only with a buffalo robe; the women also, excepting a loose apron abouta foot long. On the evening of Dec. 4th Verendrye’s son and Nolan came backand reported that the village they had visited was twice as large as that wherethey were. On Dec. 8th the latitude was taken and found to be 48° 12´ N. Itwas now decided to leave two men to winter with the Mandans to acquire theirlanguage, and return with the rest to Fort La Reine. Before they departed thehead chief was presented with a flag, and a leaden plate upon which the arms ofFrance were cut. When ready to leave, Verendrye fell sick and could not travelfor two or three days. On Dec. 24th, still weak, he reached the Assiniboine village,and was agreeably surprised when the box of papers which had been stolenwas returned in good order. On Jan. 9th, 1739, the first height of land betweenthe Missouri and Assiniboine rivers was reached; here Verendrye remained, whileLa Marque hurried on to Fort La Reine. There he arrived Feb. 1st, and sentback assistance to Verendrye, who reached the post, greatly fatigued, on the 10thof this month. The two voyageurs who had been left with the Mandans returnedto the fort Sept. 27th, 1739, with reports representing more fiction than fact.

In 1740 Verendrye visited Canada, and on Oct. 13th, 1741, he returned toFort La Reine. He afterward established a fifth post called Fort Dauphin atLac des Prairies, and a sixth, Fort Bourbon, at the mouth of the Poskoyac r.(i. e., the Saskatchewan). In April, 1742, the Chevalier Verendrye and hisbrother left Fort La Reine, and by way of the Mandan village, on a southwestwardcourse, are supposed to have reached the Rocky Mountains in January,1743. The Sieur Verendrye died Dec. 6th, 1749.

[V-12] "As they were wont to be" is a particularly fine rhetorical climax to what our young friend so innocently prides himself on having accomplished. It must have made the most stolid savage of them all smile in his sleeve, — or whateverarticle of nether apparel he wore, — as there never had been a time in hismemory, or in the memories of any of his ancestors as far back as his tribaltraditions went in the dim past, when the Sioux and Chippewas were not hereditaryfoes, who killed and scalped each other with alacrious and comprehensivereciprocity. It is true that in rare sporadic cases, when both sets of red brethrenwere exhausted in war, or when each found it necessary to let up a little on theother for a chance to hunt in peace for the necessaries of life, temporary truceshad been agreed upon. But such spasms were supposed by neither party to lastlonger than suited the convenience of either; nay, the very councils in whichsuch a peace was patched up sometimes ended in fresh bloodshed on the sacredspot; and the annals of all the Indians of North America might be siftedthrough and through to discover a more notable case of inveterate, perpetual,and ferocious warfare than is afforded by the hereditary hostility of these twopowerful nations. Pike was no doubt sincere and veracious in his representationsof the happy results of his peace-making; but his ignorance of the factsin the case must have been complete, or he would have known that such a truceas he effected was sure to be broken as soon as his back was turned — if notsooner. Furthermore, the expediency of interfering with such affairs mayreasonably be doubted; for, paradoxical as it may appear, a patched-up peacebetween tribes whose hostilities are hereditary costs more lives than it saves, andmakes more trouble than it prevents. The vigilance of both parties is relaxed,private enterprise replaces public policy, and individual murders multiply rapidlytill the normal equilibrium of forces is readjusted by open declaration ofthe always existent intertribal hostility. War is the necessary and natural stateof affairs among savages; it is the main business of their lives, and the principalif not the only means of attaining all that is dearest to their hearts; and itis better for all parties to proceed on that understanding in a straightforward,businesslike way than to bushwhack for surreptitious scalps. Such trophiesof prowess must be had in any event and at all hazards; and secret assassinationsto secure them represent in the aggregate a higher death-rate thanthat resulting from pitched battles. Meddling with unmanageable things isnever good policy, and interference with intertribal relations of savages isgenerally inhumane as well as impolitic.

[V-13] The three whose answers to Pike’s address are given in this article have already been sufficiently identified: see back, note7, p. 156, note10, p. 169,note13, p. 172. It is amusing to observe the unanimity with which theydeclined the polite invitation to visit General Wilkinson at St. Louis. OldSweet’s regrets strike me as the most ingenuous. What was the use of hisgoing in person if he sent his pipe — If we send our card to a functionary inacknowledgment of an invitation, is not the etiquette of the occasion accomplishedby that civil ceremony — Sucre’s suggestion regarding the Sioux of theupper Minnesota r., whose intentions were doubtful, was eminently practical — ifthey wanted peace, let them so signify in the usual manner. Chef de la Terreseems to have been less resourceful in polite excuses than the other two. Hecould not go unless Sucre did; but some other day, perhaps, etc. Flat Mouth’sremarks were the most astute. His excuse, whether feigned or not, was good;but as to his intention of burying the hatchet so far out of sight that he would letthe Sioux strike him even once without digging it up, we may indulge a doubt.

[V-14] This is true in a certain sense. When Pike was on Cass l., at the mouth of Turtle r., Feb. 12th-14th., 1806, he was on a Mississippian water-way of communication with Red r. and so with Hudsonian waters. But this must not betaken to indicate that he ever reached the divide between these waters, still lessthat he passed to Red r. or Red l. The fact that it has been so taken givesoccasion for this note. For the situation at the dates said, see note8, p. 157.

[V-15] Orig. No. 12, though only entitled, "A speech delivered to the Puants, atthe Prairie des Cheins the 20th day of April, 1806," included, besides the speech covered by this heading, various other matters which came up April 21st,in another council with the same Winnebagoes, and furthermore gave a reportof a conference with the Sioux, etc. Accordingly, I separate Orig. No. 12 intotwo articles, making Pike’s speech Art. 15, and supplying a new head for Art.16, to cover the rest of the proceedings at Prairie du Chien.

[V-16] The above paragraph formed no part of the letter to which it is appended, being an explanatory note which Pike added when he was about to print the letter in his book. One reason why the Indians did not get the medals they hadbeen led to expect is evident in the following extract of a letter before me fromGeneral Wilkinson to the Secretary of War, dated St. Louis, Dec. 3d, 1805:"The Indians in all directions Clamour for Medals, & it is found policy to presentthem, but we have not one in the Country, or among the factory Goods — Ifyou send any out let them be addressed to the Superintendant & not the Agent,for many & obvious reasons — the last aims at too much importance & the formermay need some."

[V-17] This is the last letter we have from Pike on the subject of the Mississippi voyage. It is, in fact, a letter of transmittal of his official report to the commanding general, and thus a sort of preface or introduction to the whole subject.In two weeks from the date of this communication Pike had started up theMissouri on his second expedition, and of course did nothing further with hisMississippi matters until he had returned from Mexico, the following year.Article 19 therefore completes the batch of miscellaneous documents, chieflyletters, which I have grouped in this chapter of "Correspondence and Conferences."But we have still to deal with four formal articles relating to theMississippian voyage; these I make the subjects of the following chapters.

[V-18] The reference is here to Captain Meriwether Lewis’ Statistical View of the Indian Nations, etc., which formed the second one of five papers accompanying President Jefferson’s message to Congress, Feb. 16th, 1806: see L. and C., ed.1893, p. cviii.

[V-19] Mr. George Anderson, the same who furnished Pike with most of the datahe obtained concerning the fur-trade. See next chapter, on the commerce ofthe Mississippi.

[VI-1] This article, for which I introduce a new chapter, with a new major head,formed Doc. No. 17 of the orig. ed., pp. 35-40 and a folder, of the Appendixto Pt. 1. The original title of the piece is preserved as a minor head of thechapter, and this will also serve to effect some sort of typographical uniformitywith the following five pieces, A, B, C, D, E, which are integral parts of thearticle, yet were in the orig. ed. separated from the rest of the article undera different heading, in larger type than the main heading itself; moreover, thepiece marked C, whose proper position was of course between B and D, wasa separate folding blanket-sheet bound to face p. 40, thus coming after E. Theconstruction of this table is such that it can be printed on two pages of thepresent edition, and be put between D and E.

Pike’s remarks on the fur-trade are sound and very much to the point;together with his descriptions of the trading-houses, etc., they represent probablythe best account extant of things as they were in 1805. His present Observations,etc., as well as his correspondence with Hugh M’Gillis (Arts. 8 and 9of the foregoing chapter, pp. 247-254), were extracted for use in the Statutes,Documents, and Papers bearing on the Discussion respecting the Northern andWestern Boundaries of the Province of Ontario, pub. Toronto, Hunter, Roseand Co., 1877, 8vo, pp. 318-323.

[VI-2] The Indian trade is not among the least of the vexed questions which theUnited States has sought to answer in the natural and necessary process ofcausing the Indians to make their exeunt from the world’s stage. The pricesat which goods were sold by private individuals, whether French, English, orAmerican, seem exorbitant, extortionate — in a word, monstrous! But trade isa thing that seems to regulate itself, without regard to theory or sentiment; theIndian trade certainly did. I once asked the lion-tamer of a popular circuswhat was the secret of his profession, expecting some discerning remarks fromhim on the power of the human eye over wild beasts, and so forth; but all hetold me was, "You just have to know your lion." In war, trade, or religion,you just have to know your Indian, as our soldiers, traders, and priests foundout for their respective selves. General Whiting has some extremely moderateand judicious words on the subject, in his Life of Pike, p. 231 seq., which Iwill reproduce in substance, as it was a part of Pike’s business on this voyageto keep an eye on the Indian traders and trade. The various expenses attendingthe transport of goods swelled the original value to such an extraordinarydegree that a knife cost an Indian the ordinary price of a handsome sword,when he stuck it in his belt; and by the time his squaw had put a yard anda half of blue strouds around her waist, her lord was in debt for an amount thatwould have bought a city belle a ball dress. Such high prices would have beenruinous to the Indian had not their trade customs furnished a corrective. FewIndians ever hunted beforehand; they seldom got their stock of skins to offerfor sale at a fair or any price, else the traffic would have been on more nearlyequal terms. They must have their outfit for the chase first, and then theymust feel the pangs of hunger before they would start on a hunt. The traderwas obliged to overcome their indolence by offering certain inducements, besidesfurnishing the necessary means. This was an invention of necessity on whichthe whole system of credits was based, and on which such a structure ofextortion and other evils was reared. The trader had to let his goods go oncredit into lazy, improvident, always uncertain and often dishonest or criminalhands, with no security for any adequate return for his outlay except in a scaleof ordinary prices that would cover him in case of extraordinary losses. Hetook great risks and put up his premium accordingly. He expected to realize200 to 250 per cent. on the price of goods for which he got anything, to coverthe loss on what he got nothing for. Thus the Indians were a prey to cupidityand extortion; they were swindled, as it seems to us. Yet they had a way ofgetting even with the most unprincipled trader, sometimes of beating him at hisown game. At the end of the hunt the Indian brought in his peltries. "Ifthese paid his debt," says Whiting, "which was not often the case, the accountwas squared; if an arrearage remained, as was generally the case, no reasoningnor threats could convince the red man that the responsibility held over toanother season, and that his obligations survived the hunt. When that huntterminated, and the furs obtained by it had been fairly rendered, he consideredthe account as canceled. Whether it was balanced or not was a question hedid not undertake to answer.

"One of the objects Lieutenant Pike appears to have been instructed tokeep in view while on his trip, was the investigation of these evils of the Indian trade, and to ascertain where proper trading establishments could befixed, which were intended to correct them. These establishments were ofcourse to be made under the patronage of the Government. They were afterwardactually made under the ’factor’ system. In a benevolent spirit, theUnited States enacted that certain stores should be conveniently placed withinthe Indian territory, where factors, having a salary and no interest in the trade,were to keep on hand a constant supply of articles suitable for the Indians,which were to be exchanged with them for peltries, the articles bearing onlya fair cost, all expenses included, and the peltries being received at a fair rate.Government thus, out of kindness to the Indians, became a trader, and a competitorwith individual traders.

"The theory was as promising as it was benevolent; but, like many theories,it did not fulfill expectation when put into practice. It is true that the Indianunder it was sure of a just equivalent for such furs and peltries as he broughtin. This assurance was spread abroad by agents, and was generally known andunderstood. But an important consideration had been omitted in the calculationsthat suggested the arrangement. Most of the Indians are improvident,and leave the morrow to take care of itself. The future causes them noanxiety. It is the present moment, with its gratifications, or its wants, thatoccupies, almost exclusively, their minds — the former exhausted with blindavidity, the latter borne with passive endurance. They seldom lay up themeans of providing themselves with the small equipments of a hunting expedition.While they used the bow and arrow, it was different. Then a few hours’exertion of their own hands provided all that was necessary. But the momenta gun was put into their hands, their dependence upon the trader was secured.They must have ammunition, or their guns were more useless than the bow andarrow; and they could obtain this only on credit.

"Hence the United States factor, who had a knife at a few shillings, anda stroud at not many more, and powder and ball at a fair rate, but who couldsell for cash only, or its equivalent, would find his shelves nearly as full at theend of the season as at the beginning; while the individual trader, who sold oncredit, though he might sell at an enormous profit, at a thousand per cent. abovehis government competitor, would empty his shelves in a few weeks. Besides,no system can work well unless it is managed well. The factor was expected,by the law, to be honest and disinterested; and he was often so. Still, he wasin a remote part of the country, and beset by temptations, and dealt witha people that were supposed to be unable to tell tales that could be understood.The system was abandoned after a vain experiment of a few years."

About the time that Pike was on this expedition, Lewis and Clark also hadtheir attention turned to the same business. One of the results of their observations was Lewis’ Essay on an Indian Policy, which had special regard to the commercial aspects of the case, and will never go entirely out of date till thelast Indian has bought his last bullet, or had it fired into him. The reader isreferred to this article, occupying pp. 1215-43 of the 1893 ed. of L. and C.

Trade is one of those things which, like a hen hunting for a nest, does bestwhen let alone. Any hen will lay more eggs and hatch more chicks in a nestof her own selection than in the most artful contrivances of the coop to providefor her comfort and convenience. All interference with a man’s tendencyto take advantage of his neighbor is unwise, and injurious to both parties. Ittends to sharpen the wits of the one and make him more of a knave than hewas before; while it blunts the wits of the other with a specious sense of beingprotected, and thus makes him a bigger fool than ever. Trade being what it is,in consequence of the great quantity of human nature there is in mankind, cannever be legislated into anything else than an attempt to enrich one’s self at another’sexpense by buying cheap and selling dear. Free trade in all the marketsof the world is the only natural postulate; all tariff regulations and restrictionsare simply necessary concessions to the inherent weakness of artificial systemsof trade. The evils of damming individual channels of trade — or rather, ofattempting to dam them with desultory yet reiterated interference — reacha climax of absurdity and injury in what is known as tariff-tinkering. Verylikely they ought to be dammed — all avenues of selfishness ought to be; butthey never will be in this world. As to the practical worldly wisdom displayedin specific measures to promote commercial activity by legislative interference,it is probable that any jockey in the land, with a hidebound horse for sale andsome arsenic in his pocket, could give our legislators pointers on those trickswhich are said to be in all trades but ours.

[VI-3] "A Mr. M’Coy" is not easily identified. I am inclined to think that thename is McKay or Mackay, and that the person meant is Alexander Mackay, whohad been with Sir A. Mackenzie, left the N. W. Co. in 1810, for Astor’s AmericanFur Co., and was blown up with the ship Tonquin in 1811; but I am farfrom feeling sure of this.

[VI-4] David Thompson was among the Mandans from Dec. 29th, 1797, to Jan.10th, 1798. He left McDonald’s house, which was near the mouth ofMouse r., on Nov. 28th, en route to the Missouri. On Dec. 7th he reached theold Ash house on Mouse r., "settled two years ago and abandoned the followingspring." Being unable to procure a guide here, he took the lead himselfand struck for Turtle mountain, west of which he again crossed Mouse r., andfollowed this stream up to the bight of the great loop it makes in NorthDakota, at a point 37 m. from the Missouri. Here leaving the river and comingsouth over the plains, he struck the Missouri Dec. 29th, at a point 6 m.above the uppermost Mandan village. These villages are said to have been fivein number, and to have contained in all 318 houses and seven tents, inhabited byMandan and Willow Indians in about equal numbers. (The census of theWillow Indians is given as from 2,200 to 2,500, in another place in Thompson’sMS., where he calls them Fall Indians.) While among the Mandans Thompsonprepared a vocabulary of about 375 words of their language. He left thevillages Jan. 10th, 1798; but being delayed by storms, it was Jan. 24th beforehe reached Mouse r., and Feb. 3d when he regained McDonald’s house.I take these items from J. B. Tyrrell’s paper on the journeys of DavidThompson, read before the Canadian Institute Mar. 3d, 1888, and pub. inadvance of the Proceedings, Toronto, 1888, 8vo, pp. 7, 8: see also note9, 167.Another account of Thompson’s travels occupies pp. 94-103 of Statutes, etc.,N. and W. Bound. Ontario, pub. Toronto, 8vo, 1877.

[VI-5] The plus in the fur-trade was the standard of value, viz.: one prime beaver(abiminikwa). In the above scale of prices the plus was reckoned as $2. Thescale was a multiple or fraction of this, which answered the purpose of an Englishshilling, French franc, Indian rupee, or our dollar. Thus Perrault tells usthat in 1784 a bear, an otter, or a lynx was worth a plus; three martens or 15muskrats were also a plus; a buffalo was two plus, etc. A keg of "made"liquor, i. e., three-fourths water, one-fourth alcohol, with a little strychnine,Cocculus indicus, or tobacco-juice to flavor and color it, has been sold to manyan Indian for 20 to 40 plus. During my recent canoe voyage to the source ofthe Mississippi, I believe that I could have been provisioned, lodged, and transportedby the Chippewas for a month at the cost of a gallon or two of "made"whisky, had I been provided with that article and disposed to put it to anunlawful purpose.

[VII-1] This article, for which I make a new chapter with a major head, was in theorig. ed. a part of Doc. No. 18 of the Appendix to Pt. 1, running from p. 41 top. 56; the remainder of the document — continuing without break to p. 66, andincluding also a folding table — being an account of the Indians. I make aseparate chapter for this ethnographic matter, beyond. I retain as a minorheading of the present chapter Pike’s original title of No. 18, nearly in his words;but must cut it down to exclude "the savages," and in so doing I also reduce itsverbiage a little. As thus restricted, this article is a rapid review or cursory descriptionof the Mississippi, in so far as Pike ascended and descended this river.Having already given a copious commentary in my notes on his itinerary, Imust refer the reader back to these for most details; here I simply bracket afew names in the text for the purpose of ready recognition, and restrict my notesto new matters which come up.

[VII-2] The form of the word Mississippi was not fixed with eleven letters till after1800. President Jefferson, a scholar of his times and especially interested inlinguistics, used nine or ten letters. Our fashion of doubling all the consonantsexcept the first is distinctly an innovation which has no advantage over Misisipi,but on the contrary the undesirable effect of obscuring the pronunciation of theAlgonquian elements by neutralizing the vowels. Analysis of the eleven lettersshows three consonantal sounds, one of them repeated, and each of these fourfollowed by a short if not neutral vowel: Mi-si-si-pi. The initial m is a nasolabial,not likely to vary, and in fact constant. This is followed by a sibilantsurd, repeated, with probable and actual variation to s of c or ch in one or bothplaces. The final consonant p is a labial surd, easily and actually variant to itssonant b. The name is really a term of two words: Misi Sipi=Misi River — whateverMisi may mean. Waiving this, and taking the name as one word, theactual variations which I have noted from time to time may be thus displayed asregards the eleven letters: (1) m, constant; (2) i, variant to a and e; (3) firsts, var. to c, or missing; (4) second s, var. to c and ch, or missing; (5) second i,nearly constant, when present; (6) third s, var. to c, not to ch, when present;(7) fourth s, same as third s; (8) third i, var. to e and y; (9) first p, var. to b;(10) second p, constant, if not dropped after the third p, never present if thethird p becomes b; (11) final i, var. to e and y. The permutations possibleunder the several variants indicated may be ciphered out by those who haveleisure for amusement; probably not one-tenth of the possibilities are actualitiesin print; and of those actually existent probably no complete list has ever beenmade. We might expect to find 30 forms without much trouble. Some of theexamples I have noted are: Mischipi, Freytas, from Spanish Relations of 1661,pub. 1663, perhaps the first appearance of the word in print; Messipi, Allouez,in French Relations of 1667, said to be the original form in that language;Mississipy, 1671; Messisipi, Joliet, after 1673; Micissypy, Perrot; Masciccipi,La Salle, qu. misprint in first syllable — Meschasipi and other forms in Hennepin,1683, and his editors; Messchsipi on an old map, about 1688; Michi Sepe,Labal, as cited by Brower; Mechesebe, etc. The general evolution of the presentword has been: early elimination of c or ch; tendency of all the vowels to i,with e in the first place and y in the last place longest persistent; and thenthe doubling of the s’s and the p, all the possible cases of this process beingnot only extant, but neither very old nor very rare. The unconscious motifhere seems to have been to give the longest river the longest name. There aremany other names of the "Mycycypy" river, aboriginal, Spanish, and French,for the whole or certain parts of its course. Spanish relations from De Sotoyield for lower parts of the river Chucagua in variant forms; Tamalisieu;Tapatui; and Mico. Also, for about the mouth, we have Malabanchia or Malabouchia,from French narration, D’Iberville, Mar. 2d, 1699. An Iroquois name,Gastacha, is cited. Spanish relations yield several of the earliest names, all ofwhich have been translated; e. g., El Rio, The River, Knight of Elvas, pub.1557; Rio Grande, Grand r., Great r., ref. to Hernando de Soto, near Quizquiz,Sunday, May 8th, 1541, and at Guachoya, Apr. 17th, 1542; Rio del EspirituSanto, as De Biedma, River of the Holy Ghost, with variant spellings of thephrase, cf. Chavez map, in Ortelius, Antwerp, 1580, and Cortés map forSpanish Charles V., 1520; Rio de las Palmas, River of Palms, Admiral map, 1507,pub. in ed. Ptolemy, 1513 (I cite these two without prejudice to the questionwhether they did actually apply or were only supposed to apply to the Mississippi);Rio de los Palisados (as I find it cited, though it seems to me R. de lasPalizadas would be better Spanish for Palisade r., the connotation of this termbeing what a steamboat man would mean if he said Snag or Sawyer r.); andRio Escondido, Hidden r., because it was hard to find the right channel throughthe delta. Certain genuflexions of French knees to powers that were andhappily be no longer, are reflected in the names Rivière de la Conception, sc.of the B. V. M., which Marquette conceived in one of the unisexual transportsof his morbid imagination, June 15th or 17th, 1673, trans. Immaculate Conceptionr.; R. de Buade, sc. Frontenac r., as Joliet, who had an eye to a visiblepatron; R. de Colbert, as Hennepin, who kept one eye on St. Anthony and theother on King Louis; R. de Louis, R. de St. Louis, R. de Louisiane of variousF. relations (St. Louis occurring in letters patent of Louis XIV. to Crozat,Sept. 14th, 1712); from descriptive phrases which are found in Radisson’s relations,Forked r. and River That Divides Itself in Two have been evolved asnames with the aid of capitals; the upper section of the stream, flowing fromLake Itasca, has been called R. à la Biche, Elk r., from the former F. nameLac à la Biche, translating Ojibwa Omoshkos Sogiagon; the next section,Bemidji-sibi, with many variants of this, in Ojibwa, French, Italian, and English;the next section, R. aux Cèdres Rouges, Red Cedar r., Cassina r., Cassr.; next section, Winnibigoshish r., in many variants; and below the confluenceof the Leech Lake fork, Kitchi-sibi, Great r. There are also several forms ofthe Sioux name, to the same effect as Kitchi-sibi. I am ignorant of any Englishname originally given as a genuine appellation, and not a translation ormere epithet, like "Father of Waters," and the like. It is text-book traditionthat this phrase translates the Algonquian term; which tradition is too untrueand too popular to ever die — let it rest in peace, along with Washington’shatchet and Tell’s apple. It is Featherstonhaugh, I think (I have mislaid themem. I once made), who remarks with great gravity and great truth, that"Father of Waters" is a misnomer, because the river resulting from the confluenceof other rivers is the Son of Waters and not the father of them at all.This is a sober sort of statement, for a witticism; it is not a figurative locutionor a flight of fancy; it is a solemn fact. It only stops short of the mostcomprehensive statement that can be made regarding the origin of rivers,which is, that all rivers arise in cloud land.

[VII-3] See note12, p. 7, and add: I suspect that Noir is not the F. adj. whichmeans "black," but a perversion of the noun Noix, Noyau, or Noyer, meaning"nut" or "walnut." Beck’s Gazetteer, 1823, gives the name as Noyer cr.

[VII-4] An opinion of Mr. Ewing occupies note18, p. 15. A hitherto unpublished letter of General William Clark, Indian Agent for Louisiana, to the Secretaryat War, is in part as follows:

"Saint Louis 22nd. June 1807.

"Sir

"... William Ewing’s Account for provisions, hired men and Squars [squaws]appears to be unatherized by any person in this Country. Mr. G. Chouteauinforms me that he never empowered him under any authority which he possessedto incur such expences to the U : States as [are] charged in his account. — Andfurther says that he has always given such provisions and other articles toMr. Ewing as he thought the Public Service required, for which he either paidhimself or included in the account of Rations settled with the Contractor. — Thepublic clammer [clamor] at this place is very much against Mr. Ewing; manyunfavourable relation has been made of his conduct, such as purchaseing theIndians Guns for whisky and selling them again to the Indians for a highprice. — Selling his corn to the Traders for trinkets for his Squar, hireing menon the behalf of the United States and sending them to work for his privatebenefit, makeing an incorrect report to me, &c. &c. I am induced to believefrom the report of Mr. Bolvar [Nicholas Boilvin] and others who are willing tosweare that Mr. Wm. Ewing has behaved incorrectly and his example is degradingto the institution, and calculate to give the Indians an unfavourable impressionof the public Agents in this Country. The Conduct of public Agentsin this distant quarter, I fear will never be under sufficent check until there is aperson to whome all are obliged to account resideing in this Country, with fullpower and descretion to inspect their actions &c. &c.

"A copy of Mr. Ewings report is inclosed in which he states the situation ofhis establishment and his prospects &c....

"Your most Obedent"Humble Servent,
[Signed] "Wm. Clark. I. A. L."

[VII-5] Being letter to General Wilkinson, from that place at that date, whichformed Doc. No. 2, p. 2, of the App. to Pt. 1 of the orig. ed. See Art. 2,p. 223. The lead mines are of course identifiable with the location of Dubuque;but the precise situation of Julien Dubuque’s house, where Pike stopped bothways, was Catfish cr., about 2 m. below. Mr. Dubuque died Mar. 24th, 1810,aged 45½ years, and was buried on the eminence close by, which became knownas Dubuque’s bluff, and still bears this name. The peculiar character of hisclaim to the property occasioned much litigation, which was carried up to theSupreme Court of the U. S., and there decided in favor of the settlers, in orabout 1853.

[VII-6] This description makes in the orig. ed. a 3-page footnote, which I reset in the main text, as no confusion will come from this obvious digression, the reader returning to Prairie du Chien in due course. It was furnished to Pike by (Robert)Dickson, whose name appears at the end. In spite of the mangling of the geographicalnames, and one or two sentences that seem to have got awry, it is avery telling piece of work — perhaps the most concise and correct statementextant in 1810 of what is one of the most memorable routes in the annals ofAmerican exploration. It was by this famous Fox-Wisconsin traverse from theGreat Lakes to the Miss. r. that the latter was itself discovered to Europeans.For it is practically if not identically the route of Joliet and Marquette, 1673.Under the Canadian governorship of Comte Louis de Buade de Frontenac, whosucceeded De Courcelle Apr. 9th, 1672, the Quebec trader Joliet, the priest Marquette,and five other Frenchmen, who were at Michilimackinac in Dec., 1672,passed thence by Green bay of Lake Michigan, Fox r., Lake Winnebago and Wis.r., to Miss. r. at Prairie du Chien, reached June 15th or 17th, 1673, and namedRivière Colbert after the French king’s minister. Our esteemed antetemporaryJonathan Carver paddled that way too, and so did others too numerousto mention, among them the macronymous G. W. Featherstonhaugh, F. R.S., etc., whose canoe voyage up the Minnay Sotor, etc., made in 1835, furnisheddata for very readable and realistic gossip, 2 vols. 8vo, Lond. 1847, I. p.151 seq. The clearest view of the Fox-Wisconsin traverse I have seen is on themap accompanying Bvt. Maj. C. R. Suter’s Rep., being Doc. E of Bvt. Maj.-Gen.G. K. Warren’s Prelim. Rep. Surv. Miss. River above Rock Island rapids,this being Ex. Doc. No. 58, Ho. Reps., 39th Congress, 2d Sess., 8vo, Washington, Government Printing Office, 1867, pp. 1-116. Accurate engineering operations always reduce the mileages guessed at by tired travelers or idle tourists,but Dickson’s estimates come remarkably near Suter’s measurements, someof which are: Lower Fox r., 37½ m.; traverse on Lake Winnebago, 15½ m.;Upper Fox r., 104 m.; canal at portage, 2 — m.; Wisconsin r., 112 m.; total,Green Bay to Prairie du Chien, 271 — m.

I may here summarize as curtly as I can the main points of the probable factthat the Upper Mississippi was reached by practically this route, by Menardand Guerin, before its long-alleged and generally accepted discovery by Jolietand Marquette, as above noted. In 1659 Fond du Lac was approached by two traders, Groseilliers and Radisson; the former was Medard Chouart, the latterPierre d’Esprit. Groseilliers, Grozayyay, Desgrozeliers, etc., was b. nearMeaux in France; traded on Lake Huron in 1646; in 1647, married Veuve — ‰tienne of Quebec, daughter of Abraham Martin; in Aug., 1653, married MargueriteHayet Radisson, sister of Radisson. Radisson was b. St. Malo, France;came to Canada 1651, married Elizabeth Herault 1656; was at Three Rivers inCanada in 1658, and arranged to go with Groseilliers to Lake Superior. Thetwo built the first trading-post on Lake Superior, at Chaquamegon bay (oldChagouamikon, etc.). Groseilliers was back at Montreal Aug. 21st, 1660; hereturned to Lake Superior and was at Keweenaw bay Oct. 15th, 1660. Some ofthe traders of his party wintered here 1660-61; with them was the JesuitMenard, the first missionary on the lake. Menard and one Jean Guerin left thelake June 13th, 1661, for the region of the Ottawa lakes in Wisconsin. Perrotsays that Menard and Guerin followed the Outaouas to the Lake of the Illinoets(Lake Michigan), and to the River Louisiane (i. e., the Mississippi), to a pointabove the River Noire (Black r.), where they were deserted by their HuronIndians. One day in August, 1661, they were ascending a rapid in theircanoe, which Menard left to lighten it; he lost his way, and perished; Guerinsurvived. Menard’s breviary and cassock, it is said, were later foundamong the Sioux. Justin Winsor’s Narr. and Crit. Hist. Amer. IV. p. 206,gives a sketch map on which a place is marked as that where Menard was lost. This seems to be toward the sources of Chippewa r. If Perrot’s relation betrue, and not misunderstood, Menard and Guerin reached the Mississippi via theWisconsin from Green bay, ascended it to the Black or the Chippewa, and leftit that way in the summer of 1661, 12 years before Joliet and Marquette cameto the Mississippi.

[VII-7] Dickson’s use of the term "La Baye" requires qualification to prevent misreading him. 1. The old Baye des Puans or Puants, Stinkers’ bay, so called from the malodorous fish-eating Winnebagos who lived thereabouts, becamefrom its verdure la Baie Verte, our Green bay, i. e., the whole water of thatgreat N. W. arm of Lake Michigan, into the head of which Lower Fox r. empties.The last 7 m. of this river makes a sort of estuary from the foot of thelast rapids, or head of natural river navigation, to the waters of Green bay;and this whole estuarian course was La Baye or La Baie of various early writers.2. The earliest French footing on the estuary was the Jesuit mission at the footof the rapids called Rapides des Pères (Priests’ rapids), whence the modern nameDe Pere or Depere for the town now at or near the spot, on the E. bank of theriver. The earliest French fort there was called Fort La Baye or La Baie; andthis is the implication of the term as the name of a spot or place on the estuaryalso called "La Baye" or "La Baie." 3. When settlement was made underEnglish occupation it crept down the estuary on the E. side to near the bay,and "La Baye," i. e., La Baie Verte, furnished the local habitation as well asthe name of our Green Bay (town), a mile or two above the mouth of the estuary.4. Under our régime, La Baie of the American Fur Company period wasat a place called Shantytown, say halfway between the old French La Baye(present town of Depere) and the less old English La Baie (present county townof Green Bay, Brown Co., Wis.). 5. There were other settlements along theestuary, on the same side too. Thus, writing of 1835, Featherstonhaugh speaksof the new American settlement of Navarino, "a short distance" from Shantytown;he describes the latter as "a small bourgade," and locates Navarino opp.Fort Howard, i. e., where Green Bay now is. 6. On the left bank, nearly opp.present Green Bay, but rather nearer Green bay, was the site of our Fort Howard,which flourished say 60 years ago, and bequeathed the name to the town ofHoward or Fort Howard, now opposite Green Bay. On the left bank higher up, opp. Depere, is a town called Nicollet, no doubt a belated bud of promise,as no such place appears on maps of 25 years ago. 7. None of the foregoing localities or establishments on Fox r. must be confounded with the recent outgrowth called Bay Settlement, which is out on the S. E. shore of Green bay, toward Point Sable.

[VII-8] Kakalin and Konimee of the above text, also Cockien of p. 295, are three forms of one word which has other curious shapes. Featherstonhaugh I.p. 162, speaks of rapids "called in the Menominie tongue Kawkawnin, literally’can’t get up,’" and says that the voyageurs make it Cocolo. Suter’s text hasKankarma; his map, Kankana. Present usage favors Kaukauna; so G. L. O.maps, railroad folders, etc. With the qualifying terms Petit and Grand, or Littleand Great, etc., the word denotes different places and things on the river;i. e., certain lower and upper rapids themselves, together with certain settlementsat or near each of these obstructions to navigation. Petit Kakalin,Petite chute, Little Konimee, Little shoot, Little rapids, designated the lowerrapids; and the town 6 m. above Depere received the name of Little Rapidsor Little Kaukauna. Some miles above this place is now Wrightstown, on theright or E. bank of Fox r. Between Little Kaukauna and Wrightstown areobstructions in the river which are or were called Rapides Croches, from theircrookedness. All the foregoing are in present Brown Co. Passing to OutagamieCo., we find what Dickson called the fall of Grand Konimee, and othersknew as Grand Kakalin, Grand chute, etc. This is now simply styled Kaukaunafalls, without any qualifying term; and the town there is KaukaunaFalls. Above Kaukauna falls and town, say 2 or 3 m., are rapids called Littlechute (duplicating a different application of the name), and within a mile of them are others known as Cedar rapids. In this vicinity is also the town of Little Chute, 7 or 7½ m. below Appleton, seat of Outagamie Co. From Appletonwe pass into Winnebago Co., and it is only 6 or 8 m. to where Dickson says"the river opens into a small lake," i. e., Lake Winnebago discharges into LowerFox r. This outlet is by two channels, N. and S., separated by Doty or Doty’sisl.; here are the Puant, or, as now known, Winnebago rapids; here was thefirst Puant or Winnebago village; here are now the cities of Menasha on the N.channel, and Neenah on the S. channel. The rapids are strongest in the latter.

[VII-9] Formerly Lac des Puans or des Puants, Stinkers’ l., etc. This is the largebody of water in Winnebago, Calumet, and Fond Du Lac cos., 35 m. long, 9 to14 m. wide, and 12 to 25 feet deep, thus being an extensive overflow of Fox r.,which enters at Oshkosh, Winnebago Co., about the middle of the W. side ofthe lake, and leaves by Neenah and Menasha, at the N. W. corner. The distancebetween these points, which was the usual canoe traverse, is 15½ m.There is a small island in this distance, known by the name of Garlic, whichFeatherstonhaugh calls Hotwater, from a droll incident he describes, I. p. 174.The Puant village which Dickson mentions as being at the upper end of thelake was at or near present Fond Du Lac, the county seat, and one of wellknown places in Wisconsin. Dickson’s midway "Fols Avoine" village was theMenomonee settlement on the E. side of the lake, in Calumet Co. (Stockbridgeand Brotherton Res.). Lake Winnebago conveniently divides Fox r. into theUpper Fox, which runs into it, and the Lower Fox, which runs out of it intoGreen bay; it also acts as a sort of reservoir or regulator to prevent freshets inthe Lower Fox. The western shore is now skirted with railroads all the wayfrom Menasha to Fond du Lac, and various towns are strung along this distance.Just before Fox r. falls in, it suffers dilatation into what was and is still calledLac Butte des Morts, the head of which is about 7 m. from Oshkosh; town ofthe same cheerful name there now. In this vicinity Loup or Wolf r. falls intothe Upper Fox, after passing through an expansion known by some such perversions of the Chippewa name as Pawmaygun, Pauwaicun, Poygan, etc.

[VII-10] This is easier to locate than to tell the name of. It is that dilatation ofUpper Fox r. which lies mainly in Green Lake Co., and for some little distance separates this from Marquette Co. The lake is 14½ m. long, but very narrow.Rush l. would be the English translation of the Indian name, a few of thevariants of which are Apachquay, Apuckaway, Apukwa, Puckaway, Packaway,Pokeway, Puckway, Pacaua, etc. Before this notable lake was reached, thecanoes passed the mouth of Wolf r., as above said; of Waukan r., dischargingfrom a certain Rush l. in Winnebago Co., in the vicinity of places called Omri,Delhi, and Eureka; a couple of small streams at and near Berlin, Green LakeCo.; Puckegan cr., the discharge of Green l., which falls in at Fiddler’s(qu. Fidler’s — ) Bend, on the S.; near this White r., on the N.; present site ofPrinceton, Green Lake Co., 12¼ m. above Fiddler’s Bend; and lastly Mechanor Mecan r., whence it is only 6 m. to Lake Puckaway. The town of Marquette,Green Lake Co., is on the lake near its foot; and 7 m. above its head isMontello, seat of Marquette Co. A stream absurdly called Grand r. falls in onthe S. between Lake Puckaway and Montello. From Montello to Packwaukeeis 8 m.; this is on B — uf, Beef, or Buffalo l., a dilatation of the river like LakePuckaway, but not so wide. There was an old French fort or factory here,whose name is given as Ganville (qu. Bienville — ). The "forks" of Fox r. of which Dickson speaks is the confluence of Necha r.; but there seems to besome copyist’s mistake about the situation of his Lac Vaseux "ten leagues above the forks"; for there is no 28½ m. of the river left. Lac Vaseux of the text, otherwise known as Muddy, Rice, and Manomin, immediately succeeds Buffalo l., being below (north of) Moundville and Roslin or Port Hope. Itseems to be reckoned a part of Lake Buffalo, for the distance hence to the Wisconsinr. is given as only about 14 m. The canal which Dickson recommendswas long since cut, with a length of 2 — m. to Portage, seat of Columbia Co.From this place along the Wisconsin r. to the Mississippi, given by Dicksonand repeated by Long as 60 leagues = 165 m., is 112 m. I have not the clue to the exact location of Dickson’s Détour du Pin or Pine Bend; but I imagineit was about the situation of Lone Rock, Richland Co., above the mouth of Pine r., and below the place that Mr. Whitney named Helena, when he had hiscurious shot-tower there some 60 years ago.

[VII-11] The Montreal or Kawasidjiwong r. is a small stream which separates Wisconsinfrom Michigan for some little distance, and falls into Lake Superior at Oronto bay, E. of Point Clinton. The connection with Sauteur or Chippewa r.,of which Pike speaks, was made by portages from the main E. fork of the Chippewa — thatis, from Manidowish, Flambeau, or Torch r. But we should notehere that there was more than one recognized route by way of the Chippewafrom the Mississippi to Lake Superior, and in Carver’s case, for example, confusionhas arisen in consequence. Thus, some say that Carver left the Mississippiby way of Chippewa r. This is true; but he did not reach Lake Superiorby way of Flambeau r. and Montreal r. Observing this, some say he reachedLake Superior by way of the St. Croix and the river he calls Goddard’s. This istrue; but he did not leave the Mississippi by St. Croix r. In June, 1767, Carvercame from Prairie du Chien up the Miss. r. to the Chippewa; he went up this forthe Ottawaw lakes, as he calls the present Lac Court Oreilles and some lesserones close by; visited the Chippewa town whence the river took its name, hesays, "near the heads of this river;... In July I left this town, and havingcrossed a number of small lakes and carrying places that intervened, came to ahead branch of the river St. Croix. This branch I descended to a fork, andthen ascended another to its source. On both these rivers I discovered severalmines of virgin copper, which was as pure as that found in any other country.Here I came to a small brook," which by confluence of others soon "increasedto a most rapid river, which we descended till it entered into Lake Superior....This river I named ... Goddard’s River," Trav., ed. 1796, pp. 66, 67. Asmall river west of Goddard’s Carver named Strawberry r., "from the great number of strawberries of a good size and flavor that grew on its banks."

[VII-12] Pike was sadly misinformed on this point. No place on the river is better known than St. Croix falls, above Osceola Mills, Polk Co., Wis., and Franconia, Chisago Co., Minn., where the descent is quoted at 5 feet in 300 yards.Higher up, the river has many rapids — toward its head so many that Nicollet’smap legends "Succession of Rapids"; Schoolcraft’s marks about a dozen; Lieut.Allen, when abandoned by Mr. Schoolcraft, encountered "almost interminable rapids"; La Salle cited Du Luth for "forty leagues of rapids," in his letterfrom Fort Frontenac, Aug. 22d, 1682; and Hennepin called the St. Croix "ariver full of rapids." They are most numerous and most nearly continuous above Yellow and Namakagon rivers, two of the principal branches of the Upper St.Croix, both of which drain from the region about the Ottawa lakes and othersin Sawyer and Washburn cos., Wis. Pike’s Burnt r. is supposed to be thesame as Carver’s Goddard r.; it is also called Burnt Wood r., from the F. BoisBrûlé, and the latter name is still in use. Burnt r. is called by Nicollet Wissakudeand by others Misacoda — a name no doubt the same as Nimissakouat,Nemitsakouat, Nissipikouet, etc., de l’ancien régime; on Franquelin’s map,1688, it stands Neouoasicoton. This last is a specially notable case, as Franquelinmarks "Fort St. Croix" and "Portage" near the head of his river at a certain"Lac de la Providence" in which he heads his "R. de la Magdelaine";for these are the Upper St. Croix l. and the St. Croix r. (This post wasprobably established by Du Luth before 1684 or 1685; he had been in Paris in1683; at Montreal, Quebec, etc., 1682 and 1681; and in June, 1680, made theBois Brûlé-St. Croix trip from Lake Superior to the Mississippi.) Franquelin’searly map, 1683-84, is said to be the first to delineate the Bois Brûlé-St. Croixroute: this shows R. de la Magdelaine connecting by Lac de la Providencewith R. Neouaisicoton, but no Fort St. Croix is there marked. This river issaid well enough to head in this lake; but more precisely, its sources are in the feeders of this lake. One of these, which is situated on a pine ridgea couple of miles off, offers the always interesting, though not very rare case of a sheet of water running two ways; for this small Source l., as it iscalled, discharges one way into the St. Croix stream, hence into the Gulf of Mexico, and the other way into Burnt r., which takes water to Lake Superior and finally to the Gulf of St. Lawrence. The Burnt is navigable, though much obstructed with shoals, rapids, and falls; it runs in the main northward, nearthe E. border of Douglas Co. (named for Stephen A. Douglas), and falls intothe Kichi Gummi, Sea of the North, West Sea, Grand Lac (Champlain’s Voy.,1632, map), Lac de Condé, Lac de Tracy, Lac Supérieur, Lacus Superior (DeCreux, 1664, map), Lake Algona, etc. There were Chippewa villages along nearly the whole line of both the rivers at various points, including one on anisland in the Upper St. Croix l. Islands and peninsulas in lakes were always favorite sites, for in such cases these Indians enjoyed some additional immunityfrom the Sioux in what we may style their "moated granges." On the St.Croix r., low down, was the Chippewa-Sioux boundary line, marked for someyears by cedar trees which stood there a few miles below St. Croix falls: seenote17, p. 101.

[VII-13] Keating, I. 1824, p. 287, cites Long’s MS. 1817, fol. 12, that MajorLong’s "boat crossed it, from a dead start, in 16 strokes." Referring to note69,p. 70, for some historical remarks on St. Pierre’s r., I wish to add here thatthis remarkable stream was at one period the main course of the Mississippi.The evidence of the rocks supports the opinion that the Falls of St. Anthonywere once opposite the position of Fort Snelling. The Mississippi above themouth of St. Pierre’s differs in various particulars from the character it acquiresbelow that point, and was once tributary to a then greater stream. This casedoes not seem to have attracted the attention to which it became entitled afterits forcible presentation by General Warren. It is not so well marked as theobvious case of the Missouri vs. the Mississippi, in which there is no questionwhich is the main and which the subsidiary stream; but it is similar. In otherwords, what the Mississippi is to the Missouri above St. Louis, that the Mississippihas been to the Minnesota above Fort Snelling.

[VII-14] The "rough draft" here in mentioned was published in the orig. ed. as aplate of page size, and is reproduced in facsimile for the present ed.

[VII-15] Pike’s phrase "Le Mille Lac" brings up an orthographic case unique insome respects. No Minnesota lake is better known than this one; but what shall we call it — Shall we say Mille Lac, and then call the county in which itis partly situated Mille Lacs, as the G. L. O. map of 1887 does — Is the singlebody of water Le Mille Lac, as Pike says, or Les Mille Lacs — Is this one lakeof a thousand, or a thousand lakes in one — Nobody seems to know; hence acrop of phrases, e. g., Mille Lac, Mille Lacs, Milles Lac, Milles Lacs; also,Mille Lac Lake, Lake Mille Lac, Lake Mille Lacs, Mille Lacs Lake; item, MilLac, Mill Lake, and other vagaries too many and too trivial to cite, all of whichthe student of Minnesota geography will discover sooner or later. The phrasebeing French, we naturally turn to see what a pure French scholar who wasalso a great geographer has to say on the subject. Speaking of the Sioux havingtheir principal hunting-camps on Leech l. and on "Minsi-sagaigon-ing, or MilleLacs," Nicollet explains in a note, Rep. 1843, p. 66: "This name is derivedfrom minsi, all sorts, or everywhere, etc.; sagaigon, lake; and ing, which is atermination used to indicate a place; so the meaning of the word is ’placewhere there are all sorts of lakes,’ which the French have rendered into MilleLacs." Whence it appears that Mille Lacs is short for some such phrase asle pays aux mille lacs, l’entourage des mille lacs, the country full of lakes, the environment of a thousand lakes, etc. Now it so happens geographically that this one lake among the thousand is vastly larger than any of the rest, perhapsthan all the rest put together; it is par excellence le lac des mille lacs, the oneamong a thousand; furthermore, that it was a Sioux rendezvous, which becameknown as Mille Lacs by a sort of unconscious figure of speech on the part ofthose who very likely never heard of the rhetorical trope synecdoche, but calleda part by the name of the whole, to suit themselves. I imagine, therefore, thatthe seeming solecism of a plural phrase for a singular thing is logically correct; that Nicollet was right in writing Mille Lacs; that Lac Mille Lacs would begrammatically defensible, though inelegant; and that we could say in English Lake Mille Lacs, or Lake Thousand-lakes, with equal propriety, though we should avoid such forms as Lake Mille Lac, or Mille Lac lake. In fine, the phrase Mille Lacs has ceased to concern any question of grammatical number,and become a mere name of two words. As for the pleonasm or tautology of such phrases as Lac Mille Lacs, or Lake Mille Lacs, etc., this need not disturbus as long as we continue to talk of "Mississippi river," for example, as thatmeans "Misi River river." There are several earlier names of this remarkable body of water. The memoir of Le Sieur Daniel Greysolon Du Luth on the discovery of the country of the Nadouecioux, addressed in 1685 to Monseigneur Le Marquis de Seignelay, as translated from the original in the archives of the Ministry of the Marine, has this passage, as given, e. g., in Shea’s Hennep., 1880,p. 375: "On the 2nd of July, 1679, I had the honor to plant his Majesty’s arms in the great village of the Nadouecioux, called Izatys, where never had a Frenchman been, no more than at the Songaskitons and Huetbatons," etc. De or DuLuth, Lhut, Lhu, Lut, Lud, whatever the trader’s name was, had come from Montreal (Sept. 1st, 1678) with six or eight men to this part of Canada and was inthe vicinity of Sault Ste. Marie on Apr. 5th, 1679, under the patronage of ComteLouis de Buade de Frontenac, who had succeeded De Courcelle as governor of Canada Apr. 9th, 1672; consequently he named the lake Lac de Buade or Lac Buade; this was its original denomination in French, and such name appears on many old maps, e. g., Hennepin’s, 1683, Franquelin’s, 1688, DeL’Isle’s, 1703, etc., some of which also mark a place by the name of Kathio, supposed to be the site of a large Sioux village, on the W. side of L. de Buade, near the base of the peninsula later known as Cormorant Point. Du Luth’sIzatys were Gens des Mille Lacs, i. e., Sioux who lived about Lake Mille Lacs inthe country of that "number of small lakes called the Thousand Lakes," asCarver phrases it; they were the Issati or Islati, Issaqui, Issanti, Issanati, Issanoti, Issayati, etc., meaning those who lived in lodges on sharp stones, i. e.,Knife Indians, at one of the Mille Lacs called Lake Isan or Knife l.However loosely Du Luth’s term Izatys may have come to be used, it designated and most properly designates the genuine original Gens du Lac, or People of Lake Thousand-lakes, our modern Mdewakontonwans. Du Luth’s Houetbatonsare supposed to be our Wakpatons, Warpetonwans, or Waqpatonwans;his Songaskitons, our Sisitonwans, Seseetwawns or Sissetons, i. e., lake-dwellers(sisi, marsh or lake, tonwan, people); these two tribes are located on old maps eastward of Lake Mille Lacs. In 1689, date of Pierre Lesueur’s and NicholasPerrot’s visit to Sioux dominions, we hear that N. E. of the Mississippi lived the Menchokatonx or Mendesuacantons, i. e., the same Sioux as Du Luth’sIzatys of Lac Buade. According to E. D. Neill, Macalester Coll. Cont. No. 10,in 1697 Aubert de la Chesnaye said that "at the lake of the Issaqui, also called Lake Buade, are villages of the Sioux called Issaqui; and beyond this lake are the Oetbatons; further off are the Anitons who are also Cioux." Neill alsocites a certain doc., dated Quebec, 1710, which states that "the three bandswith which we are acquainted are the Tintons, the Songasquitons, and the Ouadebaetons."Two of these are obviously the same as two of Du Luth’s; thethird (Tintons) are the same as the Izatys, or rather a band of Indians whocame under this more general denomination. This connection is established in Hennepin, whose Tintonbas, Tintonhas, or Thinthonhas were Sioux who livedon the St. Francis (or Rum r., the main discharge of Lake Buade) near theIssantis, and were the Indians who captured his companions and himself. This dig at the roots of primitive Sioux ethnology is merely to bring up the next name of Lac Buade; for, from such intimate connection as this body of water had with certain Sioux, it immediately became known as Lac des Issatis, and soon as Lac des Sioux, or Sioux l.; moreover, St. Francis or Rum r., which runs out of the lake, became Sioux r.; e. g., Franquelin’s map, 1688,marks "R. des François ou des Sioux." De L’Isle’s map, 1703, letters the lake "Mississacaigan ou L. Buade," and the issuant river "R. de Mendeouacanion."The first of these two Indian names is the one which Nicollet adopts for the lake in the form Minsi Sagaigoning; the other is the same word as Mdewakantonwan. Nicollet’s remark on this subject, like all his pregnant writing, requires attention here, especially as it raises a geographical besides anomenclatural point, Rep. 1843, p. 67: "We still find some confusion on the maps as regards the name of Minsi-sagaigon-ing. Some have laid it down asMille Lacs; others as Spirit lake; and on others, again, it appears as two lakes,with (separately) both names. The ambiguity arises from the fact that the same lake has been named by two nations. The one which I have adopted is fromthe Chippeways; that by which it is known to the Sioux is Mini-wakan — meaning literally, water spirit; but, in this case, intended to signify ardent spirits.The river that issues from this lake has been named Rum river by the traders; which appellation the Chippeways have translated into Ishkode-wabo, or ardent spirits; and the Sioux into Mdote-mini-wakan, or outlet of the ardent spirits."That is a dismal aboriginal pun which mixes up nature-spirits with the artificial product, turns the lake into a bottle, and the river into its neck; it is bad enough to have been perpetrated "next morning," and it is too bad that the debauches to which the traders allured the Indians should have been perpetuatedin geographical nomenclature. Spirit l. is the name under which Long, forexample, maps Lake Mille Lacs, and the Gens du Lac he calls People of Spirit Lake; and Schoolcraft, Narr. Journ. of 1820, pub. 1821, p. 214, has Great Spirit lake and Missisawgaiegon — the latter name also applied to its discharge(Rum r.). Spirit is not now a name of Lake Mille Lacs; the one for which Nicollet conserved the name Mini-wakan, and which hence became known as Spirit l.and Devil’s l., is the large body of water in N. Dakota, tributary to the RedRiver of the North; Spirit l. of modern Minnesota geography is a little one ofthe collection in Aitkin Co., between Lower Red Cedar l. and Mille Lacs l.The latter is the second largest lacustrine body of water in the State. It issituated across the intercounty line between Aitkin and Mille Lacs, about half in one and half in the other of these two counties. Its figure is more regular than usual, being squarish, with three corners rounded off and the S. E. one drawn out a little; there is also some constriction about the middle, where points facing each other run out from the E. and W. shore respectively; the shore line is said to be about 100 miles in all. The lake is readily accessible, being only some 12 m. S. of Aitkin, and is a favorite resort for outings. One of the 14 present Ojibwa reservations is on its S. shore.

[VII-16] There is an error here, as what Hennepin called the St. François in 1680is Rum r. of Carver, 1766, and authors generally; while St. Francis r. of Carver,which he thought was Hennepin’s St. François, is Pike’s Leaf r., nowknown as Elk r. See note7, p. 95, where this case is fully discussed.

[VII-17] Pike maps four on the W., above his Clear = Platte r., and below his Pinecr. = Swan r.: see note19, p. 103.

[VII-18] The name of this branch of St. Pierre’s r. in Minnesota duplicates that of a large branch of the Mississippi in Wisconsin. The Minnesota tributary is Miawakong r. of Long’s map, 1823, and Manya Wakan r. of Nicollet’s, 1843.

[VII-19] Lac à la Queue de Loutre of the F., whence the E. name. This is the largest body of water into which the Red River of the North expands in Minnesota, and may be called a principal source of that river, as Pike says, thoughit compares with the true source very much as Leech l. or Winnibigoshish l.does with that of the Mississippi. It is situated about the center of Otter TailCo., some 60-70 m. S. W. of Leech l.; Pike’s map tucks it up snug underLeech l. The Leech-Otter Tail traverse, or route by which one passed from Mississippian waters to those of Red r., as beyond indicated by Pike, is given in detail by Schoolcraft upon information of traders who were familiar with this chainof lakes. Using the nomenclature of his Narrative, etc., 1834, p. 105, it maybe stated as follows: From Leech l. through lakes called Warpool, LittleLong, of the Mountain and of the Island, to the Crow Wing series, or Longwater,Little Vermillion, Birch, and Plé. Lake Plé was the one where the routeforked — one way leading on down the Crow Wing series, the other turning off tothe Otter Tail series. The latter consisted in, first, a portage of four pauses toIsland l.; portage of one pause into a small lake which led into another, andthis into Lagard l.; half a pause to a small lake; pause and a half to another;four pauses into Migiskun Aiaub or Fishline l.; a pause into Pine l.; five pausesinto a small river which runs into Scalp l. The latter has an outlet which expandsinto three successive and about equidistant lakes, and is then received into Lac Terrehaute, or Height of Land l. The outlet of this last expands intoa lake, and again into water called Two Lakes from its form; whence the dischargeis into Otter Tail l. It is not easy to pick this exact route up from a modern map; but I may add that it runs in Hubbard, Becker, and Otter Tailcos.; that some of the lakes on or near this series are known as Height of Land,Little Pine, Pine, and Rush (these being on the course of Otter Tail r., and thereforeon the Red River water-shed); and that some places on or near the route arecalled Park Rapids, Osage, Linnell, Shell Lake, Jarvis, Erie, McHugh, FrazerCity, Lace, Perham, and St. Lawrence. The N. P. R. R. from Moorhead to Brainerd crosses the route in two or three places, one of these being between Pine and Rush lakes.

[VII-20] Pinenet or pinenett is Pike’s version of épinette of the French voyageurs, name of the tree we commonly call tamarac or hackmetack, and which the botanists know as black larch, Larix americana. It is so abundant and characteristicin some places that the wet grounds in which it grows are usually calledtamarac swamps. The sap pine of the same sentence has been already notedas the balsam-fir, Abies balsamea: see note44, p. 132. There is a Lac Sapin,called in English Balsam-fir lake. The supposed occurrence of hemlock, Tsugacanadensis, in this locality is open to question.

[VII-21] "R. le Crosse" of Pike’s map, the discharge of the lake now universally known as Ball Club: see the account of it in note56, p. 150.

[VII-22] The lake which Pike calls Winipie is the large body of water in British America, through which the combined streams of the Assiniboine and Red River of the North find their way into Hudson’s bay, and which we know as LakeWinnipeg; but this does not further concern us now. Pike’s Lake Winipeque iswhat we now call Lake Winnibigoshish, on the course of the Mississippi. TheFrench forms of the latter name, such as Ouinipique, etc., whence our Winipeque,Winipec, Winipeck, etc., are diminutizing terms, as if to say LittleLake Winipeg. There can be no occasion for confounding the two lakes, notwithstandingthe similarity and sometimes the identity of their names.

Lake Winnibigoshish is that very large dilatation of the Mississippi which liesnext below Cass l.: see note8, p. 159, for the distance between the two, and details of that section of the river which connects them. The variants of its name are moderately numerous: Winipeque, as above, but Winipec on Pike’smap; Wenepec, Lewis and Clark’s map, 1814; Little Winnepeck, Long;Winnipec, Beltrami, Schoolcraft; Winnepeg and Big Winnipeg, Allen; Winibigoshish,Nicollet, Owen — this last the only name now used, generally with doubled n, and with some variants, like Winnepegoosis, etc. This is the secondlargest body of water in the whole Itascan basin, exceeded only by Leech l., andmuch exceeding Cass l.; its area is probably not far from that of Lake Pepin,but the shape is very different. The figure is squarish, with the N. W. and S.W. corners rounded off, and the N. E. corner extended into a well-marked bay;the main diameters are about 11 m. from N. to S., and 7½ from E. to W.;the area thus indicated is little encroached upon by projecting points, so thatthe shore line is shorter than usual in proportion to the extent of waters; thecollateral feeders of the lake are comparatively few and unimportant. Thelake lies partly in no fewer than eight townships (each 6 — — 6 m. sq.); but it onlyslightly encroaches on five of these, occupying nearly all of T. 146, R. 28, 5thM., the greater part of T. 145, R. 28, and about half of T. 146, R. 27: actualarea thus equivalent to rather more than two townships, or over 72 sq. m.The construction of the government dam at the outlet has decidedly alteredthe shore line, and modified other natural features; the overflow due to thisobstruction has inundated the original shore contour in the low places, formedsome backwater expansions, and drowned countless trees. Many of these standstark and black where they grew, far out from the present shore line, whichitself is piled with drift-wood in most places. Snags also abound all alongthe wooded shores, and the water is so shallow that some beds of bulrushes riseabove the surface a mile or more from land. The scene is desolate and forbidding.Add to this a danger of navigation to an unusual degree for the frailbirch-bark canoes which alone are used on Winnibigoshish. The lake is toolarge to be safely crossed in such boats at any time. Even the Indians habituallysneak to the shore through the snags and rushes; for the water is very shallow,easily churned up to quite a sea. Sudden squalls and shifting currents arealways to be expected, and one runs considerable risk in venturing where land cannot be made in a few minutes, if necessary. It would be nothing, of course,to a well-built keel-boat with sail and oars; but a birch-bark is quite anothercraft. I have seen Winnibigoshish as smooth as glass, and then in a few minutesbeen glad to put ashore, to escape a choice between swamping or capsizing, amid whitecaps and combers at least four feet from crest to hollow, breakingon a lee shore full of snags and piled with driftwood. Good landing places arenot to be found all along; most of the shore is low, and much of it consists offloating-bog, in which a man may sink as easily, and less cleanly, than in quicksand,if he sets an incautious foot. The water is so impure as to be scarcelyfit for drinking; the lake is a sort of cesspool for all the sewerage of the basinwhose waters pass through it. Winnibigoshish, in short, is dreary, dirty, deceitful, and dangerous.

The Mississippi enters this reservoir in the S. W. part, at a point in the S. W.¼ of Sect. 36, T. 146, R. 29, 5th M., where it sweeps around a firm bank,steep enough to be cut in some places, and on which some Indians live; quite a little delta extends far out into the lake, overgrown with bulrushes to suchan extent as to hide the opening. But it is not difficult to thread any one ofseveral ways through these to the high bank just said, which is the land-mark;a more conspicuous one, from a distance, is a piece of high woodland whosepoint is due S. ½ m. from the inlet. Hence southward is the nearest approach of Leech l.; a traverse offers by means of Portage l. (Nicollet’s Lake Duponceau),though the carrying-place is somewhat over 2 m. long.

Passing northward, to our left as we start from the Mississippian inlet to go around the shore, the first prominent feature is Raven’s point, distant from the inlet 4 m. The maps all represent this as much longer and sharper than itlooked to my eye; probably much of the point that was once land is now underwater, owing to the dam. It is the site of a squalid village of Chippewas,who have been civilized into the whole assortment of our own vices. A considerablestream falls in here, which I suppose is Kaminaigokag r. of Nicollet andOwen, though it is nameless on more modern maps. Its mouth is in Sect. 18,T. 146, R. 29, close to the N. border of Sect. 19; near by is a lake about a milein diameter, probably due to overflowage. Rounding Raven’s point and proceedingN. 4 m. further, we come to a little bay into which flows a considerablestream from the W. This is Third r., often marked "III. R." The reason forthis name will presently appear. Schoolcraft in Narr. Journey of 1820, pub.1821, p. 246, calls it "Thornberry river, or La rivière des Epinettes," but F.épinette does not mean "thornberry": see note20, p. 319. The mouth of Thirdr. falls in the N. W. ¼ of Sect. 33, T. 147, R. 28. Coasting now E. along the N.shore, we round the prominence which defines Third River bay, and which I callWindy pt. from my experience there — it had no name that I could discover. Itconsists of a floating-bog for some distance back, and in this morass, further eastward,a small creek empties in Sect. 35 of the T. and R. last said; this may becalled Bog cr., if no earlier name can be found; it is not one of the regularlyenumerated streams. A mile and a half eastward of Bog cr., nearly or exactlyon the line between Sect. 36 of the same township and Sect. 31 of T. 147, R.27, is the mouth of Pigeon r. No other name is heard on the spot; but thisis Second r. or "II. R." of the geographers. Schoolcraft, l. c., called it RoundLake r., and Round l. is present name of its principal source. There is a goodlanding here on a bit of beach under a firm, bluffy bank, the site of the most decentand well-to-do Chippewa village about the lake. Three and a half miles E.S. E. of Pigeon r. is the wide, irregular opening of Cut Foot Sioux r., otherwiseFirst r., or "I. R.," which discharges from a system of lakes, the nearest one ofwhich is marked Cut Toe l. by Owen, and Keeskeesedatpun l. on the Jewettmap of 1890. This is the river called Turtle Portage r. by Schoolcraft, l. c.Several houses stand on and under the high land on the E. or left bank, a fractionof a mile back of the opening, among them the trading-house of one Fairbanks, where the usual robberies are perpetrated under another name,but without further pretense of any sort. Four miles from the mouth of theCut Foot Sioux, in a direction about S. S. E., is the outlet of the Mississippi, atthe bottom of a large bay, offset from the rest of the lake by prominent pointsof land. The separation of this bay from the main body of waters is scarcelyless well-marked than that of Pike bay from the rest of Cass l. I propose tocall it Dam bay. The points of land which delimit its opening into Lake Winnibigoshishare: A long linguiform extension from the S., occupying all the groundnot overflowed of Sects. 15 and 16, T. 146, R. 27, which may be designatedTongue pt.; and opposite this, on the N., a much less extensive prominence,which may become known as Rush pt., in Sect. 10 of the T. and R. lastsaid. Paddling 1½ m. from Cut Foot Sioux r., we go through the strait between Tongue and Rush pts., and are then in Dam bay, a roundish body ofwater about 2½ m. in diameter. At the S. end of this is the short thoroughfare(outlet of the Mississippi), less than a mile long, which leads into Little LakeWinnibigoshish, and has been dammed at its lower end, in the S. W. ¼ of Sect.25, necessitating, of course, a portage of a few yards in canoeing. The dam inpart consists of a solid embankment, stretching from the S.; the rest is thewooden construction for raising and lowering a series of gates by which the flowof water can be regulated. This work looks sadly in need of repair, and is saidto be none too secure. At the N. end of the dam is a high wooded hill, afine spring of water, and some vacant buildings; on the other side is a narrowpond over a mile long, called Rice l.

Immediately below the dam, the Mississippi dilates into Little Lake Winnibigoshish(once Rush l.), of irregularly oval figure, 2¾ m. long by scarcely over 1 m. in greatest breadth, its longest diameter about N. W. to S. E. At a pointnear the S. E. is the portage, or carrying place, over to Ball Club l., whosehead is there distant about a mile: see note56, p. 150. The outlet of the Mississippiis on the S., in the N. W. ¼ Sect. 6, T. 145, R. 26. Thence theriver flows scarcely W. of S. for 3 m. direct, but I judge fully 6½ by its extremelytortuous channel, to a place in Sect. 24, T. 145, R. 27, where somerapids occur; these, however, are easily shot. The further course of the riveris S. E., 8 m. direct, but more than twice as far by the bends, to the confluenceof Leech Lake r., or Pike’s "Forks of the Mississippi": see back, notelast cited, p. 151. This whole section of the Mississippi, from Little LakeWinnibigoshish to the mouth of Leech Lake r., is easy canoeing down, withplenty of smooth, swift water, even at low stages, and good places to camp allalong on the wooded points against which the channel continually abuts as itbends from side to side of the low bottom-land, mostly overgrown with reeds(Phragmites communis) and bulrushes (Scirpus lacustris), but toward LeechLake r. becoming meadowy and thus fit for haying. Besides the main bends,or regular channel, there are a great many minor sluices or cut-offs, practicablefor canoeists; and one is borne quickly along by the current, without mindingmuch whether one is in the channel or not. This way down, though circuitousand several times as far as the route by Ball Club l., which lies off to the left asyou descend, is decidedly preferable; but going up river I should advise oneto take the route through Ball Club, and portage over to Little Lake Winnibigoshish.

[VII-23] William Morrison is the first of white men known to have been at Lake Itasca. He wintered at Lac la Folle, 1803-4, visited Lake Itasca in 1804, andagain in 1811 or 1812. Mr. Morrison was b. Canada, 1783, d. there Aug. 9th,1866. He kept a journal, which was lost, of his movements before 1824. Hedescribed "Elk" l. to his daughter, Mrs. Georgiana Demaray, and variousother persons; he considered and declared himself the first of white men at thesource, though his claim does not appear to have become a matter of authentic, citable publication till 1856: see Final Rep. Minn. Geol. Surv., I. p. 26. Thedocument on which his claim mainly rests is the extant original of a letter addressedby William to his brother Allan, dated Berthier, Jan. 16th, 1856. Thisis published verbatim in Brower’s Report, Minn. Hist. Soc. Coll., VII. 1893,pp. 122-124. Brower says (l. c. p. 120) that the "Morrison letter," as originallypublished in Minn. Hist. Soc. Coll., I. 1856, pp. 103, 104, or 2d ed., 1872,pp. 417-419, is "a composite production." The article there covering the WilliamMorrison letter is entitled "Who Discovered Itasca Lake — " and includes a letterfrom Allan Morrison to General Alexander Ramsay (now ex-Secretary of War andPresident of the Society), dated Crow Wing, Benton County, M. T., Feb. 17th,1856. Charles Hallock, Esq., formerly of New York, the well-known authorof the Sportsman’s Gazetteer and many other works, founder of the Forest andStream weekly in New York, and of the town of Hallock, now the seat ofKittson Co., Minn., published a version of the "Morrison letter," said to be a"correct copy," in his article The Red River Trail, Harper’s Mag. XIX. No.cix, June, 1859, p. 37, which aroused the jealous recalcitration of Mr. Schoolcraft,whose reclamation was made in a letter to George H. Moore, Esq., Librarianof the New York Historical Society, dated Washington, Aug. 12th, 1859,and published in the N. Y. Evening Post, Aug. 23d, 1859, p. 1, column 4. Ihave not inspected Morrison’s autograph letter; but I have compared the threeprinted versions here in mention — the one of 1856 or 1872, Hallock’s of 1859,and Brower’s of 1893. They are all to the same effect, and evidently from onesource; but the textual discrepancies of all three are so great that they canscarcely be called "copies." Brower speaks of "several letters written by Mr.Morrison on this subject," and states that the one he prints, of Jan. 16th, 1856,"is given in full, and just as written and signed." From this imprint I extract the following clauses: "I left the old Grand Portage, July, 1802, ...in 1803-4, I went and wintered at Lac La Folle.... Lac La Biche is nearto Lac La Folle. Lac La Biche is the source of the Great River Mississippi,which I visited in 1804, and if the late Gen. Pike did not lay it down as suchwhen he came to Leech lake it is because he did not happen to meet me....I visited in 1804, Elk lake, and again in 1811-12," etc. Nothing appears to invalidate this letter; for Mr. Schoolcraft’s contemptuous contention of 1859 belittledMr. Morrison and Mr. Hallock without disproving or even disputing Mr.Morrison’s claim. The gravamen of Mr. Schoolcraft’s charge is contained inthe statement "that he [Morrison], or his friends in Minnesota, should have deferredforty-seven years to make this important announcement, is remarkable."It may have been "remarkable"; but it is not inexplicable. Mr. Henry D.Harrower, in the Educational Reporter Extra, Ivison, Blakeman, Taylor andCo., New York and Chicago, pub. Oct., 1886, 8vo, p. 17, has some discerningand judicious remarks on this score: "The statements of the brothers Morrisonhave generally been received without question by scientists and geographersin Minnesota; and in his letter Allan Morrison expresses surprise thatanyone should be ignorant of the title of his brother to the discovery of Itascaprior to Schoolcraft. It is a curious fact, however, that Allan Morrison actedas guide for Charles Lanman for a number of weeks in 1846, during whichtime they visited Itasca Lake; and that Lanman, in his published account ofthe trip, nowhere mentions Wm. Morrison, or intimates that he was ever at thesource of the Mississippi, but definitely ascribes the discovery to Schoolcraft in1832. See Lanman’s ’Adventures in the Wilderness,’ vol. i, pages 48, 75, etc.I venture the opinion that Morrison first identified his Elk Lake of 1804 withSchoolcraft’s Itasca when he read Schoolcraft’s ’Summary Narrative’ (1855);and that it is safe to say that if Morrison discovered Lake Itasca, Schoolcraftdiscovered Morrison." This may be considered to raise the question, What constitutes discovery — But that does not affect the main issue. Mr. Morrison’sdeclaration that he visited Lake Itasca in 1804 and again in 1811-12 thusfar rests uncontested. If the case is ever re-opened, it will probably be upon newly discovered documentary evidence of priority of discovery by some Frenchman. When Pike was at Leech l. he just missed, by some months and scarcely more miles, the glory of the most important discovery he could possibly have made in the course of this or his other expedition.

In May, 1820, Lewis Cass, then governor of Michigan, left Detroit with 38 men, among whom was Henry Rowe Schoolcraft. Proceeding by Michilimackinache struck the Miss. r. at Sandy l., and entered it July 17th. The narrativerecites that he went to Peckagama falls, thence 55 m. to the Forks, 45 to Lake Winnipec, and about 50 m. more to the large lake then first called Cassina andafterward Cass l. by Schoolcraft. This was entered July 21st; but the partywent no further. It was then represented to them that the source of the riverwas in a lake called La Beesh, i. e., La Biche, erroneously supposed to be 60miles N. W.; upon which the river was computed to be 3,038 m. long, at an altitude of 1,330 feet: for the particulars of this voyage, see Schoolcraft’s NarrativeJournal, etc., pub. E. and E. Hosford, Albany, N. Y., 1821, 1 vol. 8vo,pp. i-xvi, 17-419, 4 unpaged pages of index, map, plates; it is full of errors.The Cradled Hercules, as Nicollet later called it, slept on this till Schoolcraftreturned in 1832 to awaken the infant, with Lieut. Allen, Rev. Mr. Boutwell,Dr. Houghton, and Mr. Johnston, under the leadership of Chief Ozawindib.

Giacomo Constantino Beltrami was b. Bergamo, Italy, 1779; au mieux,Mme. La Comtesse de Campagnoni née Passeri, at Florence, 1812; exiled, 1821;Fort St. Anthony (Snelling), May 10th, 1823; and when Long’s expedition camein July of that year, he accompanied it up the Minn. r. and down the RedRiver of the North to Pembina, where he took offense and his congé simultaneously,between Aug. 5th-9th. The differences between the American soldierand the expatriated Italian were great and various. Major Long ejectedSignor Beltrami on the spot, and on paper dismissed him not less curtly and contemptuously, making this harsh judgment a personal matter over initials S.H. L. in Keating, I., p. 314: "An Italian whom we met at Fort St. Anthonyattached himself to the expedition and accompanied us to Pembina. He hasrecently published a book entitled, ’La Découverte des Sources du Mississippi,’&c., which we notice merely on account of the fictions and misrepresentationsit contains." Mr. Schoolcraft makes a point of snubbing Sig. Beltrami:see posteà. The amiable M. le Professeur Nicollet alone has a kindly word for hisco-laborer in Mississippian exploration: "He descended Turtle river, which emptiesinto Lake Cass; — that had been the terminus of the expedition of 1820, underthe command of General Cass, and in honor of whom it is so named. Now, as thesources of Turtle river are more distant from the mouth of the Mississippi thanthis [Itasca] lake, Mr. Beltrami thought himself authorized to publish that hehad discovered the sources of the Mississippi. Hence, perhaps, may be explainedwhy, as late as Mr. Schoolcraft’s expedition of 1832, the sources of theriver were laid down as N. W. of Lake Cass. I may be mistaken, but it strikesme that American critics have been too disdainful of Mr. Beltrami’s book,which found many readers on both continents, whilst it propagated some painfulerrors," Rep. 1843, p. 59. Hon. J. V. Brower, the latest and altogether thebest monographer, stigmatizes Sig. Beltrami as "a hero-worshipper with but onehero, and that himself," Miss. R., etc., 1893, p. 136. With me the questionis not one of Beltrami’s character, temperament, imagination, sex-relations, etc.,but simply, What did he do about the Mississippian origines — Brower gives aclear, connected, and fair answer, ibid., pp. 137-141, in part from an article byMr. A. J. Hill of St. Paul. Beltrami bravely made his way alone to Red l.,which he left Aug. 26th, 1823; was guided Aug. 28th to the vicinity of Turtlel.; found a spot whence he thought water flowed four ways, N., S., E., W., tothree oceans, and which was a part of the divide between Mississippian andHudsonian waters; named Lake Julia, tributary to Turtle l., as a "Juliansource" of the Mississippi, which it was; declared it to be the true source, ashe defined the "source" of a river, by position relative to position of the mouth;declared and certainly believed he had discovered this source, in which he wasmistaken, as it was already known; named other lakes for other friends; and was informed by his guide of Lake Itasca, which he located on his map with approx.accuracy by the name of Doe l., translating Lac La Biche of the F., thoughit appears in his text as Bitch l. by mistake. For Beltrami distinctly speaks, II.p. 434, of Lake Itasca: "which the Indians call Moscosaguaiguen, or Bitch lake, which receives no tributary stream, and seems to draw its waters from thebosom of the earth. It is here in my opinion that we shall fix the westernsources of the Mississippi," as Schoolcraft and Allen did, nine years afterward.Beltrami proceeded to Cass l., and thence to Fort St. Anthony, where he arrived after great hardships in a state of extreme destitution; went to New Orleans,and there published his first book, 1824. In all this I see no necessary occasionfor disdain or derision; the man did the best he could — "angels coulddo no more." He showed courage, fortitude, endurance, perseverance, ambition,and enthusiasm — all admirable qualities. He wrote an extravagant book,to be sure; but it displays less egotism and more fidelity to the facts, as he understoodthem, than Hennepin’s, for example, and has a higher moral quality thanthe average Jesuit Relation. He shot high, but not with a longer bow thanmany a traveler before and since himself. One test of his good faith is the perfectease with which we can find the facts in his book and separate them fromthe figments of his overwrought imagination. Heredity and environment conspired to lead him into grave errors of judgment and some misstatements of fact;but which one of us who write books can stone his glass house with impunity — Beltrami’s Julian source will run in the books as long as the water runs from that source, alongside the Plantagenian and Itascan sources. Beltrami’s maplocates Doe=Itasca l. with greater accuracy than any earlier map does. The"pointed similarity" it has been said to bear to Pike’s — and I fear as a suggestion of plagiarism — does not extend to the Itascan source, for there is not a trace of this on Pike’s published map. Beltrami went from New Orleans to Mexico,traversed that country, reached London about 1827, published his Pilgrimage,etc., 2 vols., and d. at Filotrano, Feb., 1855, in his 76th year. He fills the nichein Mississippian geographical history between Cass, 1820, and Schoolcraft and Allen, 1832; meanwhile, Itasca State Park lies mainly in Beltrami Co., Minn., which includes both the Julian and Itascan sources. There was nothing thematter with Beltrami but woman on the brain; he had a queen bee in hisbonnet — that is all. Much that has been taken for puerile conceit is the virilebadinage of a man of the world, of wit, and of penetration. I have read his Pilgrimage with interested attention; it is clear to me that Beltrami was no mere flâneur — by no means such a trifler as some of his passages might excuse one for supposing him to be. He was a well-read and well-traveled man; his obiter dicta on various things, as religion, politics, society, and other broadthemes, are generally acute. He was a brave man; I imagine Major Long hada time of it with Sioux, and Signor Beltrami too; it seems to have been a case ofscalping-knife and stiletto. As I have already cited the military mailed hand,let us see the fine Italian hand: "Major Long did not cut a very noble figure in the affair; I foresaw all the disgusts and vexations I should have to experience,"II. p. 303; "met a band of Sioux. The major thought he read hostile intentions in their faces; he even thought they had threatened him; — of course everybody else thought so too — like Casti’s courtiers; ... it was incumbenton me, therefore, to be very much alarmed, too; ... I rather think the fright they threw the major into was in revenge for his giving them nothing butboring speeches. If they meant it so they had every reason to be satisfied,"II. pp. 336-37; "Colonel Snelling’s son, who shewed the most friendly concernand apprehensions for me. He also left the major at the same time, not withoutviolent altercation, ... with considerable regret I parted from Dr. Say,one of the naturalists attached to the expedition, the only one who deserved thedesignation [this was a tickler for Prof. Keating’s fifth rib]," II. 370; "they[Colonel Snelling, Major Taliaferro, and others] were indignant against MajorLong for acting towards me in the miserable manner that he did. With respect to myself, I feel towards him a sort of gratitude for having by his disgusting manners only strengthened my determination to leave him," II. p. 483. Beltrami was evidently able to keep his own scalp, and his book is vastly diverting, except in the boggy places, where he mires us down with his gynæcosophy. It is entitled: A Pilgrimage in Europe and America, leading to the Discovery of the Sources of the Mississippi River, etc., 2 vols., 8vo, London, 1828, pp. i-lxxvi,1-472, and 1-545, map and plates. It is dedicated "To the Fair Sex. OhWoman!" The text is in epistolary form, ostensibly addressed to the countess,and consists of 22 letters, 1821-23; matter of Julian sources, II. p. 409 seq.,and map.

In 1830, Cass was directed by the War Department to request Schoolcraft, who was then an agent of the Office of Indian affairs of the W. D., to proceed into the Chippewa country to endeavor to put an end to the hostilities betweenthe Chippewas and the Sioux. The wars which neither Pike, nor Clark, nor anybodyelse had succeeded in stopping permanently in those quarters were thusindirectly the cause, and directly the occasion, of the rediscovery of the source ofthe Miss. r. Schoolcraft left St. Mary’s, at the foot of Lake Superior, late inJune, 1831, with 27 persons, exclusive of guides and Indian portagers. But theatrocious massacre of Menomonees by the Sacs and Foxes at Prairie du Chien,and other circumstances, diverted this expedition from the sources of the river,and Schoolcraft returned to the Sault Ste. Marie. The plan was resumed earlyin 1832, when another party was made up of some 30 persons, on the basis ofan attempt to effect permanent peace between the two principal tribes. Schoolcraftleft the Sault June 7th, 1832. This place was and is on a large lakewhich S. calls Igomi, Chigomi, and Gitchigomi, and others Kitchi Gummi — thoughwe prefer Lake Superior to the Chippewa vernacular. On July 3d, hereached Mr. Aitkin’s trading-house on the discharge of Sandy l., a distance ofabout 150 m. by the usual St. Louis and Savanna rivers route. Cass l. wasentered on the 10th; this was the point of departure for new exploration, as itwas that where the Cass expedition had ended July 21st, 1820. Cass l. was thendetermined to be 2,978 instead of 3,038 m. from the Gulf of Mexico by thecourse of the river. The Indian guide, Ozawindib, began to make history andimmortalize his name at this point. He took the party up the Miss. r. to LacTraverse or Pamitchi Gumaug, that is, to Lake Bemidji, and thence by the chainof lakes Schoolcraft called Irving, Marquette, La Salle, and Plantagenet, up thecourse of the "South" (better called East) fork of the Miss. r. to the Naiwa r.and Usawa l., thus discovering the linked chain which later became known asthe "Plantagenian source": see note8, p. 162. Ozawindib then portaged theparty over to the lake which Morrison had discovered in 1804. Camp waspitched on the island which by common consent bears Schoolcraft’s name, July13th, 1832. The party consisted of 16 persons, including Ozawindib, Mr.Schoolcraft, Lieut. James Allen, U. S. A., Dr. Douglass Houghton, Rev. Wm.T. Boutwell, and Mr. George Johnston. The name "Itasca" was a whim ofSchoolcraft’s, which would mislead anyone who should search Indian languagesfor its etymology, especially as Mr. S. himself affects obscurantism by saying:"Having previously got an inkling of some of their mythological and necromanticnotions of the origin and mutations of the country, which permitted the use of a female name for it, I denominated it Itasca." This is a dark hint of mystic and very likely phallic superstitions; but the facts in the case aregiven in Brower’s Report, p. 148, from personal interview with the Rev. Boutwellhimself, who said in substance that once when he and Mr. S. were in the samecanoe in 1832, the latter suddenly turned and asked him what was the Greekand Latin definition of the head waters or true source of a river. Mr. B. couldnot on the spur of the moment rally any Greek, but mustered Latin enough togive Mr. S. his choice of Verum Caput (true head) or Veritas, Caput (truth,head); by combining which latter two words, beheading one and bobtailing theother, Mr. S. made (Ver)ITASCA(put), and said, "Itasca shall be the name."He was quite equal to such juggling with words; e. g., his Lake Shiba is namedby a word which consists of the initial letters of schoolcraft, houghton, iohnston(for johnston), boutwell, and allen. It is lucky Mr. Boutwell did notthink of the Greek for "head waters," or Itasca might have been namedLake Hydrocephalus. Mr. Schoolcraft perpetuated the etymological mythby perpetrating some stanzas, two lines of which are: "As if in Indian mythsa truth there could be read, And these were tears indeed, by fair Itasca shed."None of the party appears to have noticed the smaller lake south of Itasca,though it was only 333 yards from the head of the W. arm, which was not explored;and in fact the visit of so much historical moment was in itself butmomentary. The main point ascertained was the location of Itasca to the S. W.of Cass l., where Beltrami had already represented it to be, instead of the N. W.where Schoolcraft had supposed it was. The many little lakes and streams inthe Itasca basin, and all nice topographic features, were left to be discovered by Nicollet and his successors. Their Chippewa guide took them back by wayof the main, west, or Itascan course of the river to Cass l., whence they went to Leech l., thence by the chain of lakes to Crow Wing r., and so on to the Mississippi again. It is certainly not my desire to disparage Mr. Schoolcraft; but one who could be taken to the source of the Mississippi and leave it the same day, seeing nothing but what was shown him, and giving only a glance at that, was not the person who should have snubbed Beltrami as he did when hewrote that "a Mr. Beltrami, returning from the settlement of Pembina by the usual route of the traders from Red Lake to Turtle Lake, published at New Orleans, a small 12mo volume under the title of ’La découverte des sources duMississippi, et de la Riviere [sic] Sanglante,’ a work which has since been expanded into two heavy 8vo volumes by the London press" (Narrative, etc.,heavy 8vo, New York, 1834, p. 73). That sort of a sneer at a prior explorerin the same region comes with particularly bad grace from a gentleman whowas expert in expanding his own stock of information to the most voluminous proportions, and whose cacoëthes scribendi, by dint of incessant scratching, finally developed a case of pruritus senilis, marked by an acute mania for renaming things he had named years before: see his Summary Narrative, etc., Philada.,Lippincott, Grambo and Co., 1855. Mr. Schoolcraft never forgave Sig.Beltrami for telling where Lake Itasca would be found; had he done so, hewould have been untrue to the supreme selfishness, inordinate vanity, vehement prejudices, and conscientious narrow-mindedness with which his all-wise and all-powerful Calvinistic Creator had been graciously pleased to endow him. Another account of Schoolcraft’s expedition of 1832 occupies pp. 125-132 ofMinn. Hist. Soc. Coll., I. 2d ed. 1872; Mr. Boutwell’s narrative of the same is found ibid., pp. 153-176.

James Allen’s name is not so well known in this connection as it should be.That is to say, the public seldom connects his name with the discovery of Lake Itasca. But if Mr. Schoolcraft was the actual head of the expedition of 1832,and became its best known historian, Lieutenant Allen was a large and shapelyportion of the body of that enterprise, decidedly the better observer, geographer,and cartographer; item, the commander of the military escort, which mighthave been necessary for safety and success; item, the author of an able,interesting, and important report upon the subject, which he made to themilitary authorities. He was detailed for this duty by order of A. Macomb,Major-General, commanding the army, dated Hdqrs. of the Army, Washn., May9th, 1832, and proceeded to Fort Brady, Mich., with a detachment consistingof Corporal Wibru, and Privates Briscoe, Beemis, Burke, Copp, Dutton, Ingram,Lentz, Riley, and Wade, of the 5th Infantry. He was gone June 6th-Aug.26th, 1832. His movements were the same as Mr. Schoolcraft’s, except wherethe latter left him in the lurch on the St. Croix; his operations more extensiveand more intelligently directed to explore and report upon the country. Henamed Schoolcraft isl. and various other things; Allen’s bay was named for himby Mr. Schoolcraft, and Allen’s l. by Mr. Brower. Allen was an Ohio man,appointed from Madison, Jefferson Co., Ind., cadet at West Point, July 1st,1825; 2d lieut. 5th Infantry, July 1st, 1829; 2d lieut. 1st Dragoons, Mar. 4th,1833; 1st lieut. May 31st, 1835; capt., June 30th, 1837; on detached service,engineering duty, Chicago, 1837-38; d. suddenly at Fort Leavenworth, Kas.,Aug. 22d or 23d, 1846, as lieutenant-colonel of a Mormon battalion of volunteerinfantry he had raised to re-enforce our Army of the West, "beloved whileliving, and regretted after death, by all who knew him," Hughes, Doniphan’sExped., 1847, p. 53. His valuable Mississippi report, completed at Fort Dearborn(Chicago), Nov. 25th, 1833, was transmitted to Congr. by Hon. LewisCass, Sec. of War, Apr. 11th, 1834, and published in Amer. State Papers,Class V. Milit. Affairs, V. Ex. Doc. No. 579, 1st Session, 23d Congr., folio,pp. 312-344, and map.

The illustrious name of Jean Nicolas Nicollet is first in time on the roll of those who have applied modern methods of exact and exacting science to the geography of the West. Nicollet is most highly appreciated by those who arethemselves most worthy of appreciation and most competent critics. Thus,Gen. G. K. Warren pronounces Nicollet’s map "one of the greatest contributionsever made to American geography." It will stand forever as the sound basisof knowledge on the subject. Notices of Nicollet’s life and work are found in:Trans. Assoc. Amer. Geol. and Nat., 1840-42, Boston, 1843, pp. 32-34; Amer.Journ. Sci., 1st ser., XLVII. p. 139, sketch by Prof. H. D. Rogers; Minn.Hist. Coll., I. (of 1850-56), 2d ed. 1872, pp. 183-195, memoir by Gen. H. H.Sibley; VI. 1891, pp. 242-245, being reminiscences in the autobiography ofMaj. Lawrence Taliaferro; and VII. 1893, pp. 155-165, notice by J. V. Browerwith portrait; Ann. Rep. Smiths. Inst., 1870, p. 194; Frémont’s Memoirs, I.pp. 30-72, passim; notice in Educational Reporter Extra, Oct., 1886, by H. D.Harrower; and especially N. H. Winchell, Amer. Geol., VIII. Dec., 1891, pp.343-352, with portrait and best biography. N. was b. at Cluses in Savoy, 1790;d. Baltimore, Md., Sept. 11th, 1843. He was a watchmaker’s apprenticetill æt. 18; was a natural musician; studied languages and mathematics, and in1818 published an article which became noted in the annals of insurance for itscalculations on probable duration of human life; he wrote others of similarcharacter; 1819 to 1828, he published various mathematical and astronomicaltreatises; was decorated in 1825 with the Cross of the Legion of Honor; at onetime held a professorship in the Royal College of Louis Le Grand; was also aninspector of naval schools; he was in high esteem, and made money. But thefickle goddess of fortune ceased to smile; he made business ventures whichfailed, and cost him all his worldly goods and all his fair-weather friends; in1832 he was a poor refugee in the United States. But his amiable character,his accomplishments, his great talents, and greater genius were more conspicuousin adversity than they had been in prosperity. He made friends everywhere,among them some in high stations, able to estimate his abilities andglad to use his services. Under the auspices of the War Department, andwith the personal attentions of such men as Pierre Chouteau, Jr., Gen. Sibley,and Maj. Taliaferro, he was enabled to make, 1833-39, those several explorationsand surveys which resulted in his Map and Report — a work which wouldhave done credit to anyone under any circumstances, but one which only aNicollet could have accomplished under the actual conditions. In 1840 and1841 he was on office duty in Washington, reducing his field-work and preparing his map, which latter was drawn under his direction by Lieuts. J. C.Frémont and E. P. Scammon. This was completed probably in 1840, as it had been submitted to Congress and ordered to be printed, Feb. 16th, 1841.But the hardships he had endured in the field had undermined his frail physique;the further drafts upon his balance of vitality were overdrawn; and thefatal blow was given by Arago, who defeated his election to the FrenchAcademy. "Pas même un Academicien," this great soul never wore the crown of his life. His work was published under the editorship of Gen. J. J.Abert, to whom science is indebted in many ways — perhaps in no one of thesemore than in the recognition of the merits of the gentle Savoyard, and consequentlythe steps he took to facilitate and complete Nicollet’s labors. Thepublication forms Doc. No. 237, 26th Congr., 2d Session, entitled: Reportintended to illustrate a Map of the Hydrographical Basin of the Upper Mississippi River, made by I. [sic] N. Nicollet, etc., 1 vol, 8vo, Washington, Blairand Rives, 1843, pp. 1-170, map, 30¾ — — 37 inches; also pub. as Ex. Doc. No.52, Ho. Reps., 2d Sess., 28th Congr. The report is officially addressed toColonel Abert; the original journals and other MSS. were to be deposited inthe Bureau of the Corps of Topographical Engineers, Sept. 13th, 1843. I haveexamined the original map, from which the published one was engraved, notwithout some variant lettering here and there; it is now in bad condition, verybrittle, and would soon go to pieces if often unrolled without great care inhandling it. I think it should be renovated, without delay, and put in thebest possible condition for permanent preservation.

July 26th, 1836, Nicollet went from Fort Snelling to the Falls of St. Anthony, with Lieutenants S. N. Plummer, G. W. Shaw, and James McClure, to see him off; 29th, he was ascending the river; at the mouth of the Crow Wing he left the Mississippi, ascended the former to Gayashk or Gull r., went from this toPine r., visited Kadikomeg or Whitefish l. thence up E. fork of Pine r. to Kwiwisensor Boy r., and down this into Leech l., where he spent a week, mostlycamped on Otter Tail pt., where resided his principal guide, Francis Brunet — "aman six feet three inches high — a giant of great strength, but at the sametime full of the milk of human kindness and, withal, an excellent naturalgeographer." He found here Mr. Boutwell, who was good enough to help himout of some sort of a scrape the Chippewas got him into. He left Leech l. ina bark canoe with Brunet, another man named Desiré, and a Chippewa whosename he renders Kegwedzissag, since spelled Gaygwedosay and applied to acreek which runs into present Elk l. He crossed several small lakes and cameto one he calls Kabe-Konang — not the same as Schoolcraft’s Kubba Kunna,which latter is the one S. called Lake Plantagenet, and is on Nicollet’s Laplace r.He continued up Kabekonang r., made a 5-m. portage to Laplace r. (whichis also called Naiwa, Yellow Head, and Schoolcraft’s r., being the Plantagenetfork of the Miss. r.), and ascended it to a position 1 m. south of Assawa l.,where he found the traces of a camp used four years before by the Schoolcraftparty. Next morning he was up at 4.30, preparing for the 6-m. portage toLake Itasca across the Big Burning — by no means an easy thing; the groundwas very bad, and the mosquitoes as bad as they knew how to be. Brunet carriedthe canoe, weighing 110-115 lbs.; Desiré and Kegwedzissag had each a load of85-90 lbs.; while poor Nicollet had a full burden in proportion to the powersof the slight and frail body that was so soon, alas! to fail him altogether. "Ihad about 35 pounds’ weight unequally distributed upon my body.... I carriedmy sextant on my back in a leather case thrown over me as a knapsack; thenmy barometer slung over my left shoulder; my cloak thrown over the sameshoulder confined the barometer closely against the sextant; a portfolio underthe arm; a basket in hand which contained my thermometer, chronometer,pocket compass, artificial horizon, tape-line, &c. On the right side, a spy-glass,powder-flask, and shot-bag; and in my hand a gun or an umbrella accordingto circumstances. Such was my accoutrement." Though Nicollet estimatedhis load at only 35 pounds, it was an awkward one to manage, and morethan he should have undertaken to carry through such a place; his head swammore than once, he lost his way, got bogged several times, and only extricated himself by scrambling along slippery and decayed tree-trunks. However, he reached Itasca safely, two hours after the rest, pitched his tent on the island,and proceeded to adjust his artificial horizon. During the three days spent inexploring the basin he made those minute and precise observations which willforever associate his honored name with Mississippian discovery. His approach to the spot duplicated Mr. Schoolcraft’s; but the comparison need not be pushed further — it cannot be. Nicollet’s return was by way of the main streamto Lake Cass and thence to Leech l. — where, by the way, he had a conferencewith that sagacious savage Eshkibogikoj, otherwise Gueule Platte or Flat Mouth,with whom he took tea "out of fine china-ware" and spent evenings "full ofinstruction." Of the fine work he did at Lake Itasca, I must quote his ownmodest words: "The honor of having first explored the sources of the Mississippi and introduced a knowledge of them in physical geography, belongs to Mr.Schoolcraft and Lieutenant Allen. I come only after these gentleman; but Imay be permitted to claim some merit for having completed what was wantingfor a full geographical account of these sources. Moreover, I am, I believe, thefirst traveler who has carried with him astronomical instruments, and put themto profitable account along the whole course of the Mississippi, from its mouthto its sources." He might well have claimed more than this; for, aside from alltopographic and hydrographic details, what he discovered, determined, anddescribed was the Mississippi itself above Lake Itasca. His praise is greatestin the mouths of wisest censure, and for once in the history of discovery noone withholds from modest merit and signal achievement their just dues.

The length of this note warns me to resist the temptation to pursue post-Nicolletian exploration and touring — through the names of Charles Lanman, 1846; Rev. Frederick Ayer and son, 1849; Wm. Bungo, 1865; Julius Chambers,of the New York Herald’s "Dolly Varden" expedition, 1872; James H. Baker,in official capacities, 1875-79; Edwin S. Hall, U. S. surveyor, 1875; A. H. Siegfried,representing the Louisville Courier-Journal’s "Rob Roy" expedition,1879; O. E. Garrison, 1880; W. E. Neal, 1880 and 1881; Rev. J. A. Gilfillanand Prof. Cooke, in May, 1881, the same year that one X. Y. Z. exploited hisfraud — to that of J. V. Brower, 1888-94. The scandalous episode in a record otherwise honorable to all concerned may be read in all its unsavory particularsin the able exposés made by Mr. H. D. Harrower, entitled: Captain Glazierand his Lake, etc., pub. Ivison, Blakeman, Taylor and Co., N. Y., Oct., 1886,pp. 1-58, with 9 maps; by Mr. Hopewell Clarke, in Science and Education, I.No 2, Dec. 24th, 1886, pp. 45-57, with 5 maps; by Hon. James H. Baker, inthe report entitled: The Sources of the Mississippi. Their Discoveries, realand pretended, read before the Minn. His. Soc., Feb. 8th, 1887, and publishedas Vol. VI., Pt. I, of that society’s Collections, pp. 28; and by CommissionerBrower, pp. 191-209 of his elaborate and exhaustive monograph, pub.1893, to which I am greatly indebted, and to which reference should be madefor further details, whether in the history or the geography of the Mississippiansources. Nicollet is the pivotal point upon which the whole matter turns fromMorrison to Brower, 1804-1894.

Some Additional Facts about Nicollet, not given on my foregoing pages, may be found in Horace V. Winchell’s article, Amer. Geologist, Vol. XIII,pp. 126-128, Feb., 1894. The date of birth is there given as July 24th, 1786(not 1790); the name, as Joseph (not Jean) Nicolas Nicollet; and the place of death, as Washington, D. C. (not Baltimore, Md.); the date is the same — Sept.11th, 1843.

[VIII-1] As explained in note1, p. 287, this chapter is that part of Doc. No. 18which relates to the Indians, running pp. 56-66 and folder, without break in thetext of p. 56 from the geographical matter. But its separation seems desirable,and I accordingly make a chapter for its accommodation. There is nochange in the sequence of the matter.

[VIII-2] The Sacs and Foxes have a curious history, perhaps not exactly paralleled by that of any other tribes whatever. The names are linked inseparablyfrom the earliest times to the present day. Each has always been to theother what neither of them has ever been to any other Indians or to any whites — friend.The entire composure with which we have been able to speak of Sacsand Foxes in our day and generation is the reverse of the frame of mind whichmany persons now living can recall as having been once theirs, before the finalsubjugation of these capricious, turbulent, and enterprising tribes in trans-Mississippian territory. They are Algonquian Indians who can be traced in bloodfrom Lake Ontario westward, along the gauntlet they ran from Ontarian Canadato the final burying-grounds of their hatchets in Iowa, Kansas, and theIndian Territory. They fought everybody in their way — French, English, andAmerican in turn, as well as perhaps every Indian tribe they encountered. Theywere alternately friends and foes of each of the two principal nations whose landsthey overran — their Algonquian relations the Chippewas, and their natural enemiesthe Sioux, thus at times turning the balance of power between these twohereditary foes. They inhabited at times many places along the Great Lakesand westward, and the present names of not a few are directly traceable to suchoccupancy. They were specially identified with the histories of Wisconsin, Minnesota,and Illinois for more than a hundred years. Carver speaks of their villageson the Wisconsin r. in 1766, after they had been expelled from the GreenBay and Fox River region. They appear to have been driven from the St. Croixby the decisive battle at the Falls, in which they were defeated by the Chippewasunder Waboji (d. 1793). Writing of 1832, Schoolcraft speaks of theirrecent residences on Rock r., and their confinement west of the Mississippiby the then latest tragic act in their history. This was the decisive battle ofthe Bad Axe in 1832: see note51, p. 45. The Foxes are located on the oldmaps under some form of their Chippewan name Otagami; they were alsocalled Miskwakis or Red Earths; their F. name Reynard, which we translateFox, and sometimes Dog or Wolf, was an opprobrious nickname or nom deguerre. The Indian name Osagi, Osawki, Osaukee, Sauk, Sac, Sacque, etc., isby some said to signify the erratic propensities of the tribe which bears it, meaningmigrants, or those who went out of the land: for a probably better definition,see note16, p. 101. The survivors of both tribes scarcely number 1,000.

Le Bras Cassé, or Broken Arm, was a Sac chief whom Pike names Pockquinike in his folding Table of the Foxes and other Indians. He was a noted character, whose name turns up in various published accounts. He figures, forexample, in the Relation, etc., of Perreault, on the scene of the assassination ofMr. Kay at Sandy Lake, May 2d, 1785, by Le Cousin and his mother, both ofwhom knifed their victim. Le Cousin was promptly stabbed by Feebyain orLe Petit Mort, a friend of Kay’s, and Brasse Casse (as Mr. Schoolcraft spellshis name) took Kay in hand to cure him; but the wound proved fatal Aug.26th, 1785.

[VIII-3] Folding Table F of the orig. ed., facing p. 66 of the App. to Pt. 1, with apart of it, which the printer could not get on the sheet, overrun as p. 66 of the main text, headed "Recapitulation." In the present ed. this overrun piece isdrawn into the table, which, as now printed, can be set unbroken on two pagesfacing each other.

For the modern scientific classification of the Siouan linguistic family in general, and of the Dakotas or Sioux in particular, see my ed. of Lewis and Clark,1893, pp. 94-101, and pp. 128-130. As that work is or should be in the handsof all good Americans, the subject need not be traversed here. Taking thatarticle as a modern norm or standard of comparison, it may be useful to givehere the classification and nomenclature of the Sioux which was adopted byMajor Long, who was next in the field after Pike with an account of these Indians,Keating, I. 1824, chap. viii., p. 376 seq. The Dacota, he says, meansthe allied, who in their external relations style themselves Ochente Shakoan,which signifies the nation of seven (council-) fires, represented by the followingseptenary division which once prevailed: 1. Mende Wahkantoan, or People ofthe Spirit lake. 2. Wahkpatoan, or People of the Leaves. 3. Sisitoan, orMia Kechakesa. 4. Yanktoanan, or People of the Ferns. 5. Yanktoan, orPeople descended from Ferns. 6. Titoan , or Braggers. 7. Wahkpakotoan, orPeople that shoot at Leaves. Of these Long has it that No. 1 was the Gens duLac of the French, and Nos. 2-6 were all included in the Gens du Large of theF. traders, i. e., People "at large," roving bands of prairie Sioux. But theFrench had other terms, especially Gens des Feuilles for No. 2, and Gens desFeuilles Tirées for No. 7. Comparing Long with Pike, we find: Long’s No.1=Pike’s No. 1. Long’s No. 2=Pike’s No. 2. Long’s No. 3=Pike’s No. 3.Long’s Nos. 4 and 5=Pike’s No. 4, with his two divisions. Long’s No. 6=Pike’sNo. 5. Long’s No. 7=Pike’s No. 6. Such a concordance as this deservesa red-letter mark, considering how seldom authors have agreed uponSioux; and Pike is entitled to the credit of establishing the seven main tribes.In his census, to be compared with Pike’s, Long gives total lodges, 2,330; warriors,7,055; souls, 28,100: see Pike’s Abstract, on pp. 346, 347. These aredistributed by Long as follows: No. 1, 160 — 305 — 1,500. No. 2, 120 — 240 — 900.No. 3, 130 — 260 — 1,000; to which add for the Kahra (Pike’s Cawree)band of Sissetons, 160 — 450 — 1,500. No. 4, 460 — 1,300 — 5,200. No. 5, 200 — 500 — 2,000.No. 6, 900 — 3,600 — 14,440. No. 7, 100 — 200 — 800. To whichadd for various stragglers 100 — 200 — 800, making total of lodges, warriors, andsouls, as above. Long estimated the revolted Stone Sioux, Haha, or Assiniboinesat 3,000 — 7,000 — 28,100, or almost precisely the same as all the other Sioux together. Long’s interesting particulars of the 14 bands which he recognizes, by dividing his No. 1 into seven and separating the Kahras from the other Sissetons, may be thus summarized: No. 1. Mende-Wahkantoan: (1) Keoxa;pop. 40 — 70 — 400; chief Wapasha, Wabasha, La Feuille or Leaf; two villages,one on Iowa r., other near Lake Pepin; hunt both sides of the Miss. r. nearthe Chippewa r. and its tributaries. Keoxa means "relationship overlooked";i. e., they inbreed closer than other Sioux. (2) Eanbosandata, so called fromthe vertical rock on Cannon r.; pop. 10 — 25 — 100; chief Shakea; two smallvillages, one on the Miss. r., other on Cannon r.; hunt on the headwaters ofthe latter. (3) Kapoja, signifying light or active; one village (at the GrandMarais or Pig’s Eye marsh near St. Paul); pop. 30 — 70 — 300; chief, the celebratedChetanwakoamene, Petit Corbeau, or little Raven, who visited Washingtonin July, 1824; hunt on St. Croix r. (4) Oanoska, meaning great avenue; chief Wamendetanka or War Eagle, formerly dependent on Petit Corbeau; onevillage (Black Dog’s) on the St. Peter, S. side, near the mouth; pop. 30 — 40 — 200;hunt on the Miss. r. above Falls of St. Anthony. (5) Tetankatane,meaning Old Village; the oldest one among the Dakotas; 400 lodges therewhen Wapasha’s father ruled the nation; Wapasha formerly lived there, butmoved away with most of his warriors; those that stayed chose a new leaderfrom amongst themselves, whose son Takopepeshene, the Dauntless, now rules;pop. 10 — 30 — 150; village on the St. Peter, 3 m. above its mouth; hunt onthis and Miss. r. (6) Taoapa; one village on the St. Peter; pop. 30 — 60 — 300;chief Shakpa, whose name means Six, is third in the nation, ranking next after La Feuille and Petit Corbeau; hunt between the Miss. and St. Peter. (7)Weakaote, a small band dependent on (6); pop. 10 — 10 — 50. No. 2. Wahkpatoan,or Gens des Feuilles; name said to mean "people that live beyond those that shoot at leaves," i. e., higher up the river than the Wahkpakatoan;hunt near Otter Tail Lake; chief Nunpakea, meaning "twice flying." No. 3.Miakechesa or Sisitoan: (a) Sissetons proper; no fixed abode; chief rendezvous,Blue Earth r.; hunt buffalo over to the Missouri; live in skin tepees;their chief Wahkanto, or Blue Spirit, by hereditary right. (b) Kahra or WildRice Sissetons; no fixed abode; Lake Traverse and Red r.; skin lodges; followchief Tantankanaje, Standing Buffalo, hereditary, but also a warrior. No.4. Yanktoanan, the Fern Leaves, an important tribe, pop. one-fifth of thewhole nation; no fixed residence; skin lodges; hunt from Red r. to the Missouri; trade at Lake Travers, Big Stone l., and the Shienne r.; principal chief,Wanotan, the Charger. No. 5. Yanktoan, descended from the Fern Leaves;live and trade on the Missouri; hunt on E. side of that river; chief Tatanka Yuteshane, meaning one who eats no buffalo. No. 6. Tetoans, Braggers; byfar the most numerous tribe of the Sioux, by some said to compose one-half of the nation; rove between St. Peters and the Missouri; trade on both rivers;live in skin lodges; hostile, great boasters; their chief Chantapeta, or Heart ofFire, a powerful warrior. No. 7. Wahkpakotoan, a name rendered by Long"’Shooters at Leaves,’ which they mistake for deer." No fixed abode; rovenear head of the Cannon and Blue Earth rivers; skin lodges; their last leaderShakeska, White Nails, who died in 1822; he rose to his station by his militaryability. They have a regular hereditary chief Wiahuga, the Raven,acknowledged as such by the Indian Agent; but he became disgusted with thebehavior of his tribe, and withdrew to Wapasha’s. Long agrees with Pike ingiving this band a bad name as a lawless set. Pike says they were mere vagabonds,and refugees from other tribes on account of misdeeds. These Siouxwere also called Gens des Feuilles Tirées and Leaf Shooters. In the Lewis andClark schedule they formed the Ninth tribe of Sioux, named Wahpatoota, orLeaf Beds. A queer form of the name is 8apik8ti=Ouapikouti, on one ofJoliet’s maps.

The earliest form of the word Sioux is believed to be Naduesiu, derived from Jean Nicolet’s journey of 1634-35, as written about five years later in the Jesuit Relations, by Father Le Jeune. The form Nadouessis, pl., is used byRaymbault and Jogues, who were at the Sault Ste. Marie in 1641 (Jes. Rel. of1642). Nadouesiouek is given in a Relation of 1656, Nadouechiouec, 1660;and soon also Nadouesseronons, Nadouesserons, etc.

An excellent article on the Sioux, entitled Dakota Land and Dakota Life, byRev. E. D. Neill, occupies pp. 254-294 of the 2d ed. 1872, of Minn. Hist. Soc.Coll., originally published in 1853.

[VIII-4] The punctuation of the last two sentences in the original left Pike’s meaning obscure. It was by no means evident whether the language which he had usedto the Indians held up to their minds a happy coincidence of circumstanceswhich the traders helped to bring about before the Almighty interfered at all, orwhether the happy coincidence of circumstances consisted in the endorsement ofhis language both by the traders and the Almighty. On the whole, I am inclinedto think he meant that the speeches he made to the Indians whom he addressed directly were repeated and backed up by the traders among those Indians towhom he had no access; and that this was the happy coincidence of circumstanceswhich enabled the Almighty to finish the business. But after all I amnot quite confident that I catch his meaning. If I do, I must say that he is notvery complimentary to the Deity, whose assistance he suspects may have beennecessary to effect that which the traders and himself jointly attempted. For it seems from his further reflections on the subject that he thought God possibly equal to burying the hatchet between the Sioux and Chippewas, but hardly able to keep the peace without the assistance of the military and of a special agent.However, Pike was nothing if not a good soldier, and he had Napoleonicauthority for supposing that God would always be found on the side of theheaviest artillery.

Stopped Here - Smith

[IX-1] This article formed Doc. No. 2, pp. 52, 53 of the App. to Part III. of the orig.ed., entitled "Explanatory Table of Names of Places, Persons, and Things,made use of in this Volume." But there is not a name of any person in it, andnot a name of anything in it that does not belong to Part I., i. e., to the Mississippivoyage alone. Having thus been obviously out of place in Part III., itis now brought where it belongs, and a new chapter made for it, with a newhead, which more accurately indicates what it is. But even as a vocabulary of Mississippian place-names, it is a mere fragment, neither the plan nor scope ofwhich is evident, as the names occur neither in alphabetical nor any otherrecognizable order, and include only a very small fraction of those which Pikeuses in Part I. of his book. He may have intended to make something of itwhich should justify the title he gave it, and left it out of Part I. for thatreason; but nothing more came of it, and it was finally bundled into Part III. The lists include a few terms which do not occur elsewhere in the work, as forexample, "River of Means"; but are chiefly curious as an evidence of thedifficulty our author found in spelling proper names twice alike.

Notes

  1. Capuchin A Catholic friar.


Text prepared by:


Spring Quarter 2015:


Spring Quarter 2015:


Winter Quarter 2015-2016:


Spring Quarter 2016:



Spring Quarter 2017:

Summer Quarter 2019: